The Newsletter for the Society for Medicines Research

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Newsletter for the Society for Medicines Research The Newsletter for the Society for Medicines Research Volume 8 Issue 1 January 2002 The Role of Sodium Channels in Disease Case Histories Meeting by Alan M. Palmer and Nick Carter by the SMR Committee The September 2001 symposium convulsant that is now used widely The Society for Medicines Research focused on the role of sodium channels (lamotrigine) and an impressive neuro- (SMR) held a one-day meeting on in disease. Native sodium channels protective agent that is in clinical trials Case Histories in Drug Discovery on 6 exist as polypeptide multimers of an for stroke (sipatrigine). The December 2001 at the National Heart α-subunit (260kD) and subsidiary and development of the next generation of and Lung Institute in London. These smaller β-subunits (generally three sodium channel blockers will be meetings have been organised by the β β β greatly facilitated by an elaboration of SMR biannually for many years and different subunits: 1, 2 and 3). The α-subunits are structurally diverse, the pharmacology of the various this latest meeting of the series arising from multiple sodium channel isoforms, which itself is dependent attracted over 100 registrants. The genes and alternative splicing events. upon the existence of reliable, rapid and purpose of these meetings is Recent progress has led to a good high-throughput assays for sodium educational: it allows those interested understanding of the molecular channel activity. in drug discovery to hear succinct structure of sodium channels, how they accounts of recent successes. There work and the significance of their Introduction was no overall linking theme between expression in particular cell types. Sodium channel activity is intrinsic to the talks other than that each success neurotransmission and therefore has a This, coupled with experimental studies story has led to the introduction of a linking particular isoforms with central role in normal neuronal new and improved product for particular disease states and the function. Sodium channels are highly therapeutic use. The drug discovery selective molecular pores, the opening discovery of distinct human sodium stories covered in the meeting were channelopathies (specific mutations in and closing of which shape membrane extremely varied and, put together, specific isoforms that cause a variety of potential changes and give rise to emphasised that each successful story characteristic action potentials. Over- diseases, including paralysis, long QT is individual and special. This activation of sodium channels can lead syndrome and epilepsy), is beginning to meeting is also special for the SMR in reveal how particular sodium channel to neuronal dysfunction. Thus, the that it presents its ‘SMR Award for subtypes underlie specific pathologies. depolarisation of plasma membranes Drug Discovery’ in recognition of that occurs in acute brain injury (such as All this provides great potential for the outstanding achievement and development of new therapies. The first stroke and traumatic brain injury) or contribution in the area. These generation of sodium channel blockers over-stimulation of certain neurones successes were considered in the (such as that occurring in chronic pain has led to a broad-spectrum anti- context of the high risk of failure in (continued on page 4) drug discovery and the rarity of successful new product introduction. Malcolm Duckworth: The programme included two New SMR Chairman unrelated talks on chiral drugs both of Dr Malcolm Duckworth has taken over as the which have a currently marketed Chairman of the Society for Medicines racemate — single isomer switches. Research. All his industrial life has been Dr Sverker von Unge (AstraZeneca, spent in research in the pharmaceutical Sweden) related the account of the industry. He started as a medicinal chemist development of nexium with Beecham Pharmaceuticals in the late (esomeprazole) (2), the S-enantiomer 1970s at the Walton Oaks Research Site in of the proton pump inhibitor, Losec Surrey and continued in that discipline with SmithKline Beecham where he gained (omeprazole) (1), the top-selling anti- experience in metabolic, anti-infective and ulcer drug. To understand why CNS disease areas. His emerging interest in esomeprazole was developed, it was genomics led to him to move into important to know the origin and Bioinformatics in 1997. He is currently head mechanism of action of the racemate. of a bioinformatics group in Glaxo- Omeprazole was discovered in the late SmithKline with responsibility for 1970s as a blocker of gastric-acid supporting the European Centres of strong supporter of the SMR. He joined the secretion and came from a medicinal Excellence for Drug Discovery, and is based Committee in 1995 and became the Honorary at Harlow in Essex. Secretary in 1998.• chemistry programme based on a Dr Duckworth has always been a (continued on page 2) page 2 (continued from page 1) 2000. Committee pyridine-based thioamide. Elucidation The second isomer talk was of the mechanism of action of given by Dr Robert Gristwood Secretariat omeprazole showed that it was a (Arachnova Ltd) who described the Lilian Attar, Triangle House, prodrug which relies on a protonated story behind ChirocaineTM Broomhill Road, London SW18 4HX, form of the compound reacting with the (levobupivacaine) (3), the single-levo Tel: 020 8875 2431; e-mail: enzyme H+/K+ ATPase. The basicity of enantiomer of the racemic drug secretariat@ socmr.org. the pyridine is important. While the bupivacaine (4), currently the leading free base is acid labile, if present in long-acting local anaesthetic. Chairman sufficient quantity, it can penetrate the Chirocaine was developed through to Dr D. Malcolm Duckworth, Glaxo- parietal cells of the gastric mucosa registration by Chiroscience Ltd (now SmithKline, New Frontiers Science wherein the protonated form made part of Celltech Group) and is currently Park, Third Avenue, Harlow, Essex inside the cells accumulates, because of marketed in 11 countries (the first in CM19 5AW; fax: 01279 622929. much-reduced permeability. In a 2000), including the US. It represented reversible process, a reactive the first new chemical entity from a Vice-chairman intermediate is formed from the ‘UK biotech company’ to be approved Dr David Cavalla, Arachnova Ltd, St protonated omeprazole, which reacts in the US by the FDA in 1999. Dr John’s Innovation Centre, Cambridge with a mercapto group of the enzyme. Gristwood gave some background to CB4 0WS; fax: 01223 722 577. Omeprazole, therefore, has a fast mode single-isomer switches and reasons why of action at the target, which leads to they should be considered. Some Honorary Secretary high selectivity and a long duration of advantages may be to give drugs that Dr Alan M Palmer, Vernalis, action. However, improvements were are less toxic, or more potent, or that Oakdene Court, 613 Reading Road, sought in pharmacokinetic profile, in have cleaner pharmacokinetic profiles. Winnersh, Wokingham RG41 5UA; terms of less inter-individual variability Over 500 drugs currently exist as fax : 0118 989 9300. and greater resistance to gastric juice. racemates but possibly only 5% are Several hundred compounds suitable. Unfortunately, the properties Honorary Treasurer were synthesised in the search but none of the enantiomers are not predictable Dr Mark A Giembycz, Department of could surpass omeprazole. An ongoing from the racemates, for example, liver Thoracic Medicine, National Heart and project was to test fully both toxicity is seen with an enantiomer of Lung Institute, Dovehouse Street, Lon- enantiomers since either might meet the labetalol and QT prolongation is don SW3 6LY; fax: 020 7351 5675. requirements for a backup compound. observed for R-fluoxetine. With improved methods for The story behind Chirocaine Committee synthesising large quantities of each provided an interesting strategic Dr Richard Armer, Organon isomer, it was shown that both isomers contrast to the nexium story. Adopting Laboratories Ltd; fax: 01638 736187. have identical enzyme inhibitor potency a systematic evaluation of racemic drug in vitro, but in vivo, in rats, the R- opportunities, bupivacaine was Dr Kate Brown, Imperial College of isomer was more potent and had higher identified as a candidate for a single Science and Technology; fax: 020 7594 bioavailability compared with the S- isomer switch. The decision to proceed 5207. isomer. Alkaline salts of the isomers with development in 1993 was based on Prof Nick Carter, St George’s were found to be crystalline which was Chiroscience’s expertise in single- Hospital Medical School; fax: 020 also advantageous for future clinical isomer synthesis and development, the 8725 5967. studies. Surprisingly, in man, there was hypothesis that levobupivacaine had a reversal of isomer superiority with the similar local anaesthetic activity to the Dr Simon Hodgson, GlaxoWellcome; S-isomer showing 90% inhibition of racemate but lower cardiotoxicity in fax: 01438 763615. stimulated acid secretion compared with man, and the ability to protect the 25% for the R-isomer after 15mg p.o., product commercially through use-and- Dr Ian Morris, University of Man- day 7. In addition, the clearance of the process patents despite the absence of a chester; fax: 0161 275 5600. S-isomer was slower by approximately substance-of-matter patent. In order to Prof Clive Page, King’s College one-third of the R-isomer. Individual evaluate data clearly the metabolism of London; fax: 020 7848 6097. differences were explained by chiral drugs has to be considered as it variations in the metabolic enzyme can often lead to racemisation or chiral Prof Barry Potter, Dept of Pharmacy CYP2C19. This form of the enzyme inversion, which would negate the and Pharmacology, University of Bath; does not exist in the rat. In summary, advantages. In the case of fax: 01225 826114. nexium is superior to omeprazole levobupivacaine, the compound is because of advantageous metabolism, metabolised to inactive species rather Dr Sandy Pullar, Lilly Research acid control is greater, faster, more than to the dextro isomer. Evidence Centre; fax 01276 853 525.
Recommended publications
  • Biotechnology and the Economics of Discovery in the Pharmaceutical Industry
    BIOTECHNOLOGY AND THE ECONOMICS OF DISCOVERY IN THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY HELEN SIMPSON Office of Health Economics 12 Whitehall London SWlA 2DY ©October 1998. Office of Health Economics. Price £7.50 ISBN 1 899040 60 9 Printed by BSC Print Ltd, London. About the Author Helen Simpson is currently a researc~ economist at the Institute for Fiscal Studies and was formerly an economist at the Department of Trade and Industry. However, the opinions expressed here are her own and do not necessarily reflect the views of the IFS or of DTI officials or ministers. Acknowledgements This paper has been developed from my MPhil Economics thesis Scientist Entrepreneurs and the Finance of Biotech Companies. I would like to thank Margaret Meyer, Paul David and Gervas Huxley for their valuable suggestions. I am particularly grateful to Hannah Kettler and Jon Sussex for their advice and editorial inputs to the paper. My thanks also go to Adrian Towse and members of the OHE Editorial Board for their comments, and to the following individuals who gave me their insights into the pharmaceutical industry: Dr Trevor Jones, Director General, ABPI; Dr Janet Dewdney, Chairman, Adprotech; Dr Clive Halliday, Head of Global External Scientific Affairs, Glaxo Wellcome; Mr Alan Galloway, Head of Research Administration, Dr Nick Scott-Ram, Director of Corporate Affairs, and Dr Philip Huxley, all of British Biotech; Christine Soden, Finance Director, Chiroscience; Ian Smith, Lehman Brothers Pharmaceutical Research; and Paul Murray, 31. The Office of Health Economics Terms of Reference The Office of Health Economics (OHE) was founded in 1962. Its terms of reference are to: • commission and undertake research on the economics of health and health care; • collect and analyse health and health care data from the UK and other countries; • disseminate the results of this work and stimulate discussion of them and their policy implications.
    [Show full text]
  • Specialists in Small Molecule Drug Development
    Specialists in Small Molecule Drug Development Dr Stephen Parker, Chairman Dr Tim Mitchell, CEO & Co-Founder Dr John Reader, CSO & Co-Founder Final Results for the Year Ending 30 June 2019 October 2019 www.sareum.co.uk Disclaimer The information contained in this document (“Presentation”) is directed at (i) members or creditors of a corporate body within the meaning of Article 43 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotions) Order 2005, as amended ("Order"), (ii) persons who have professional experience in matters relating to investments falling within Article 19(5) of the Order, or (iii) those persons to whom it can otherwise be distributed without contravention of article 21 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (“FISMA”) or to whom it can lawfully be distributed. This Presentation has been prepared by Sareum Holdings PLC (“Company”) and provided to you for information purposes only. This Presentation is not an invitation or inducement to engage in an investment activity for the purposes of FISMA. This Presentation has not been approved by an Authorised Person (as defined in s31 FISMA), as would be required for financial promotions under s21 FISMA and, for the avoidance of doubt, is not a financial promotion for the purposes of FISMA. If, contrary to the above, this Presentation is deemed to be a financial promotion for the purposes of FISMA, the Company relies on the exemptions set out in Articles 19, 43, 59 and 69 of the Order, which exempts companies admitted to trading on relevant markets making certain communications. Please note that any indication of past performance should not be relied upon as a guide to future performance.
    [Show full text]
  • Programme 10.00 Registration 10.20 Welcome from the Host
    Leadership Seminar: Respiratory and Inflammatory Diseases 22 September 2016 Penningtons Manches, 125 Wood Street, London EC2V 7AW Sponsored by Hosted by Programme 10.00 Registration 10.20 Welcome from the Host 10.30 Introduction Adrian Dawkes, PharmaVentures 10.45 Keynote presentations and discussion on unmet clinical needs including: 10.45 Symptoms vs Disease Modification Approach Lars Larson, TranScrip 11.05 Prospects for the prevention and treatment of respiratory virus-induced exacerbations in asthma and COPD Garth Rapeport, Pulmocide 11.25 Eosinophil depletion with benralizumab (anti-IL-5R) for the management of Severe Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Suzanne Cohen, MedImmune 11.45 Breath Biopsy - Breath Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) as Markers for Respiratory Disease Billy Boyle, Owlstone Medical 12.05 Panel discussion and Q&A 12.30 Lunch and networking 14.00 Data Protection and Liability in Respiratory Connected Devices Oliver Bett, Penningtons Manches 14.20 Adaptive Design in Respiratory Clinical Trials – A Sponsor’s Business Case Alethea Wieland, Scope International 14.40 Development of Immunoassays and Point-of-Care Tests for the Measurement of Active Protease Biomarkers of Chronic Respiratory Disease David Ribeiro, ProAxsis 15.00 Aiming for the Lungs - Formulation Strategies for Delivery of Inhaled Biologics Charlotte Yates, Vectura 15.30 Tea, coffee and networking 16.00 Innovative therapeutic options 16.00 The Development of an IL-17BR therapeutic antibody for the treatment of Asthma and IPF David Matthews, MRC Technology 16.20 Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Derived Peptide as a Disease Modifying Therapy for Asthma Nicky Cooper, Peptinnovate 16.40 Closing Remarks and Drinks Reception 18.00 Event closes Speaker Profiles Oliver Bett Associate, Penningtons Manches Oliver is an associate in our IP, IT and commercial team of Penningtons Manches, based in the London office.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Securities and Exchange Commission Form 10-K Shire Pharmaceuticals Group
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K (Mark One) ፤ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999 អ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Commission file number 0-29630 SHIRE PHARMACEUTICALS GROUP PLC (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) England and Wales (State or other jurisdiction (I.R.S. Employer of incorporation or organization) Identification No.) N.A. East Anton, Andover, Hampshire SP10 5RG England (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) 44 1264 333455 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Name of exchange on which registered American Depository Shares, each representing Nasdaq National Market 3 Ordinary Shares, 5 pence nominal value per share Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None (Title of class) Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ፤ No អ Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference to Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
    [Show full text]
  • Drug Discovery Chemistry
    Save up to $200! Final Agenda Register by February 23 COVER CHI’s 13th Annual CONFERENCE AT-A-GLANCE PLENARY KEYNOTES SHORT COURSES Drug Discovery AGENDA Plenary April 3-4 Conferences »» Protein-Protein Interactions Keynotes »» Inflammation»&»Autoimmune» Inhibitors Chemistry »» Kinase»Inhibitor»Chemistry Optimizing Small Molecules for Tomorrow's Therapeutics »» GPCR-Targeted Drug Design »» Fragment-Based»Drug» Activity-Based April 2-6, 2018 | San Diego, CA | Hilton San Diego Bayfront Discovery Proteomics: April 4-5 Conferences Protein and »» Ubiquitin»Proteasome»System» Ligand Discovery Inhibitors on a Global Scale CONFERENCE PROGRAMS »» Small»Molecules»for»Cancer» Benjamin F. Cravatt, Immunotherapy PhD, Professor and APRIL 3-4 APRIL 4-5 APRIL 6 Co-Chair, Department »» Macrocyclics»&»Constrained» of Molecular Peptides Medicine, The Protein-Protein Ubiquitin Proteasome Biophysical Approaches »» Targeting»Complex» Scripps Research Membrane»Proteins Institute Interactions System Inhibitors for Drug Discovery April 6 Symposia »» Biophysical»Approaches»for» Lead Optimization Inflammation & Small Molecules for Drug»Discovery for Drug Metabolism Autoimmune Inhibitors Cancer Immunotherapy »» Lead»Optimization»for»Drug» & Safety Metabolism»&»Safety » Targeting Ras » Blood-Brain»Penetrant» Kinase Inhibitor Macrocyclics & Blood-Brain Inhibitors and MYC for the Treatment of Chemistry Constrained Peptides Penetrant Inhibitors HOTEL & TRAVEL Cancer Stephen Fesik, SPONSORSHIP PhD, Professor GCPR-Targeted Targeting Complex Plus Short Courses & EXHIBIT
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Analyst Day
    2019 Analyst Day March 12, 2019 NASDAQ: LGND 2 Safe Harbor Statement The following presentation contains forward-looking statements by Ligand and its partners that involve risks and uncertainties and reflect Ligand's and it’s partners’ judgment as of the date of this presentation. Words such as “plans,” “believes,” “expects,” “projects,” “could,” “anticipates,” and “will,” and similar expressions, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include, without limitation, financial projections, expectations regarding research and development programs, potential uses of capital, including any potential dividend or share repurchase program, and the timing of the initiation or compilation of preclinical studies and clinical trials by Ligand and its partners. Actual events or results may differ from Ligand’s expectations due to risks and uncertainties inherit in Ligand’s business, including: Ligand has wide discretion on its use of capital and may choose not to engage in any share repurchases, declare any dividends or pursue acquisitions or internal develop programs; Ligand and its partners may not be able to timely or successfully advance any product(s) in its internal or partnered pipeline;, drug development program benefits may not be realized; Ligand will achieve its guidance in 2019 or thereafter; third party research summarized herein may not be correct or complete; Kyprolis®, EVOMELA® and Zulresso™ may not perform as expected, Ligand relies on collaborative partners for milestone and royalty payments,
    [Show full text]
  • Form 8-K Ligand Pharmaceuticals
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 ______________ FORM 8-K ______________ CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): October 11, 2020 LIGAND PHARMACEUTICALS INCORPORATED (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter) Delaware 001-33093 77-0160744 (State or other jurisdiction of (Commission File Number) (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 3911 Sorrento Valley Boulevard, Suite 110 San Diego CA 92121 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) (858) 550-7500 (Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code) N/A (Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report) Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions: ☐ Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) ☐ Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) ☐ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) ☐ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Trading Symbol(s) Name of each exchange on which registered Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share LGND The Nasdaq Global Market Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933(§230.405 of this chapter) or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (§240.12b-2 of this chapter).
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix One the CELLTECH CASE STUDY
    City Research Online City, University of London Institutional Repository Citation: Mc Namara, P. (2000). Managing the tension between knowledge exploration and exploitation: the case of UK biotechnology. (Unpublished Doctoral thesis, City University London) This is the accepted version of the paper. This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent repository link: https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/7870/ Link to published version: Copyright: City Research Online aims to make research outputs of City, University of London available to a wider audience. Copyright and Moral Rights remain with the author(s) and/or copyright holders. URLs from City Research Online may be freely distributed and linked to. Reuse: Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge. Provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. City Research Online: http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/ [email protected] Managing the Tension Between Knowledge Exploration and Exploitation: The Case of UK Biotechnology By Peter Mc Namara Presented in fulfilment of the requirements of the: Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Strategy and International Business City University Business School Department of Strategy and Marketing March 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SHIRE PLC (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K [X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Commission file number 0-29630 SHIRE PLC (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Jersey (Channel Islands) 98-0601486 (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) organization) 5 Riverwalk, Citywest Business Campus, Dublin +353 1 429 7700 24, Republic of Ireland (Address of principal executive offices and zip code) (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Name of exchange on which registered American Depositary Shares, each representing three NASDAQ Global Select Market Ordinary Shares 5 pence par value per share Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None (Title of class) 1 Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act Yes [X] No [ ] Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act Yes [ ] No [X] Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
    [Show full text]
  • Milner Symposium 2020
    THERAPEUTICS SYMPOSIUM 2020 GLOBAL THERAPEUTIC ALLIANCE OVERVIEW A SERIES OF ONLINE EVENTS STARTING ON JUNE 12TH ALLIANCE GLOBAL THERAPEUTIC ALLIANCE The Milner Therapeutics Institute encompasses both a research institute and a global outreach programme for collaboration. GLOBAL THERAPEUTIC ALLIANCE Research in the Milner Therapeutics Institute is funded by: Our outreach programme is through the Global Therapeutic Alliance, which aims to build a global research community working together across academia and industry, with Cambridge providing a hub of expertise. The Milner Therapeutics Consortium is central to this aim (p4), and the Alliance has been expanded with the Affiliated Company p8( ) and Affiliated Institutions scheme p37( ) to bring complementary expertise and resources to the community, and provide opportunity to extend collaborative links within and beyond Cambridge. The Affiliated Venture Partnersprogramme, operational since October 2017, provides mentoring and potential funding opportunities for the Milner Therapeutics Institute and its Global Therapeutic Alliance, and especially for our in-house company accelerator Start Codon. 3 CONSORTIUM ASTEX PHARMACEUTICALS MILNER THERAPEUTICS CONSORTIUM The Milner Therapeutics Astex is a leader in innovative drug discovery and Consortium is an academic- development, committed to the fight against cancer and industry partnership, active since diseases of the central nervous system. Astex is developing June 2015. This is underpinned a proprietary pipeline of novel therapies and has multiple
    [Show full text]
  • 4586728.98 in 2005
    Detail Awards by Sponsor Dept Name FY05 Award Federal National Cancer Institute 47,048,096.55 National Institute of Heart, Lung, and Blood 38,794,591.33 National Institute of General Medicine Science 30,400,147.18 National Institute of Child Health & Human Development 29,863,697.92 National Institute of Allergy & Infectious Diseases 27,492,973.12 National Science Foundation - Research 20,659,748.00 National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive & Kidney Diseases 19,575,845.00 National Center for Research Resources 19,179,710.00 National Institute of Mental Health-NIH 16,727,938.80 US Department of Education 15,868,100.00 US Agency for International Development 12,743,904.00 National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 11,961,787.00 National Institute of Neurologic Disorders and Stroke 11,957,697.00 Centers for Disease Control 10,507,132.00 National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research 7,032,009.35 National Institute on Alcohol Abuse & Alcoholism 6,874,910.00 Bureau of Health Professions 5,797,479.00 National Institute of Arthritis Musculoskeletal Skin Disease 4,921,205.00 US Environmental Protection Agency - GRANTS 4,586,728.98 National Institute on Aging 4,159,889.94 National Institute on Drug Abuse 4,111,248.00 National Institute of Nursing Research 4,094,244.00 National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering 4,079,842.59 Maternal and Child Health Bureau 4,049,730.00 National Science Foundation - Training 3,877,378.00 National Center for Chronic Disease Prev & Health Promo(CDC) 3,384,180.00 US Department of Defense
    [Show full text]
  • An Insight Into Our Life Sciences and Healthcare Sector
    An insight into our Life Sciences and Healthcare Sector 2020 allenovery.com 2 An insight into our Life Sciences and Healthcare Sector | 2020 © Allen & Overy LLP 2020 3 Contents Introducing Allen & Overy 04 Full service, international support for the life sciences and healthcare sector 05 M&A/corporate finance 06 Licensing and collaborations 09 Patent litigation 11 Regulatory 13 Dispute resolution/arbitration 14 Equity and debt financing 15 Restructuring 16 Key contacts 17 allenovery.com 4 An insight into our Life Sciences and Healthcare Sector | 2020 Introducing Allen & Overy GEOGRAPHIC SPLIT BY TOTAL NUMBER OF LAWYERS† 141 Central & Eastern Europe 1,016 UK 929 Western Europe 440 129 Asia Pacific 185 Middle East North, Central & South America 77 Africa GLOBAL PRESENCE NORTH AMERICA EUROPE AFRICA ASIA PACIFIC New York Amsterdam Istanbul Casablanca Bangkok Seoul Washington, D.C. Antwerp London Johannesburg Beijing Shanghai Barcelona Luxembourg Hanoi Singapore CENTRAL & Belfast Madrid MIDDLE EAST Ho Chi Minh City Sydney SOUTH AMERICA Bratislava Milan Abu Dhabi Hong Kong Tokyo São Paulo Brussels Moscow Dubai Jakarta* Yangon Bucharest* Munich Perth * Associated office Budapest Paris ** Cooperation office Düsseldorf Prague † All figures represent the Frankfurt Rome financial year 2016/17 Hamburg Warsaw Source: Regional active headcount October 2018 KEY STATISTICS 5,400 2,300 550 40+ Number of staff Number of lawyers Number of partners Offices around the world © Allen & Overy LLP 2020 5 Full service, international support for the life sciences and healthcare sector Our global Life Sciences and Healthcare sector comprises a multi-disciplinary team. We act for companies and their investors across the industry, including in the pharmaceuticals, biotech, animal health, consumer health, med tech, and diagnostics sectors.
    [Show full text]