Building Climate Resilience of Limpopo Basin in Mozambique

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Building Climate Resilience of Limpopo Basin in Mozambique Building Climate Resilience of Limpopo Basin in Mozambique RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN (RAP) PHASE 1: Draft Physical and Socio-Economic Survey Report NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY To: Administração Regional de Águas do Sul (ARA-Sul), Mozambique August 2018 www.smec.com Contents GLOSSARY, ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS............................................................................... V NON TECHNICAL SUMMARY ......................................................................................................... 9 S.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................9 S.1.1 Background and Justification of the Project .......................................................9 S.1.2 Project Proponent ...................................................................................................9 S.1.3 Purpose of a Resettlement Action Plan ............................................................... 10 S.1.4 Stages for Preparation of a Resettlement Action Plan and Purpose of the Report................................................................................................................ 10 S.1.5 Project Description ............................................................................................... 11 S.2 Approach and Methodology ........................................................................................... 13 S.3 Legal and Policy Framework ........................................................................................... 13 S.3.1 National Policy and Legal Framework .............................................................. 13 S.3.2 International Policies ........................................................................................ 14 S.4 Institutional Framework ................................................................................................. 15 S.5 Public Participation and Consultation ............................................................................ 20 S.6 Socio Economic environment ......................................................................................... 21 S.6.1 Affected communities ...................................................................................... 21 S.6.2 Demographic profile ......................................................................................... 22 S.6.3 Land tenure ....................................................................................................... 24 S.6.4 Land Use Patterns ............................................................................................. 24 S.6.5 Livelihood and income sources ........................................................................ 26 S.6.6 Production and marketing ................................................................................ 27 S.6.7 Ownership of Assets ......................................................................................... 29 S.6.8 Social Services ................................................................................................... 29 S.6.9 Gender relations ............................................................................................... 33 S.6.10 Non-Governmental Organizations / Community Based Organisation ........... 33 S.6.11 Historical, Cultural Heritage and Communal Property .................................... 33 S.6.12 Tourism ............................................................................................................. 34 S.7 Project Impacts ............................................................................................................... 34 S.7.1 Physical Impact of the Project .............................................................................. 34 S.7.2 Affected Population .......................................................................................... 35 S.7.3 Potential Impact on Buildings .............................................................................. 36 S.7.4 Potential Impact on Crops, Trees and Gardens ................................................... 38 S.7.5 Potential Impact on Pasture Areas ...................................................................... 38 S.7.6 Impact on Public Infrastructure and Utilities ...................................................... 38 S.7.7 Impact on Cultural Sites and Assets ..................................................................... 38 S.7.8 Households above 170masl .................................................................................. 39 S.7.9 Potential Impacts from Alternative Transport Quarry Routes to Boane, Moamba and Mabalane Quarry Sites .............................................................................. 39 S.7.10 Positive Impacts from the Project ...................................................................... 40 S.8 Eligibility Framework ...................................................................................................... 41 S.9 Analysis of Potential Alternative Resettlement Areas .................................................... 42 S.10 Grievance Resolution Mechanism .................................................................................. 44 S.12 Next Steps for the Phase 2 and Phase 3 of the RAP ....................................................... 45 S.12.1 Background ......................................................................................................... 45 ESIA for Building Climate Resilience of Limpopo Basin in Mozambique: NTS; RAP; October 2018 i S.12.2 Scope of Works for Phase 2 and Phase 3 ........................................................... 46 S.12.3 Deliverables ........................................................................................................ 47 ESIA for Building Climate Resilience of Limpopo Basin in Mozambique: NTS; RAP; October 2018 ii TABLE OF FIGURES FIGURE 1: GENERAL PROJECT LOCATION ...................................................................................... 11 FIGURE 2: AFFECTED COMMUNITIES ............................................................................................ 22 FIGURE 3: LAND USE PATTERNS ................................................................................................... 25 FIGURE 4: TRANSPORT NETWORK IN THE PROJECT AREA .............................................................. 32 ESIA for Building Climate Resilience of Limpopo Basin in Mozambique: NTS; RAP; October 2018 iii LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1: PROJECT PROPONENT DETAILS ...................................................................................... 10 TABLE 2: MAPAI DAM KEY COMPONENTS. ................................................................................... 11 TABLE 3: ADMINISTRATIVE UNITS OF THE DIRECTLY AFFECTED COMMUNITIES ............................. 21 TABLE 4: ESTIMATED NUMBER OF AFFECTED FAMILIES BY THE DIFFERENT WATER LEVEL SCENARIOS.................................................................................................................................. 35 TABLE 5: AFFECTED FAMILIES BY DISTRICT, VILLAGE AND LEVEL .................................................... 35 TABLE 6: SUMMARY OF MAIN BUILDINGS BY DISTRICT AND VILLAGE WITHIN 156/169 WATER LEVEL .......................................................................................................................................... 36 TABLE 7: TOTAL NUMBER OF AUXILIARY BUILDINGS PER DISTRICT, COMMUNITY AND WATER LEVEL 156/169 ............................................................................................................................ 37 TABLE 8: ESTIMATED NUMBER OF INFRASTRUCTURE THAT WILL BE AFFECTED BY THE SELECTED ROUTES (ALTERNATIVE 1) FOR STONE TRANSPORTATION IN BOANE AND MOAMBA DISTRICTS .... 39 TABLE 9: ENTITLEMENT MATRIX .................................................................................................. 41 ESIA for Building Climate Resilience of Limpopo Basin in Mozambique: NTS; RAP; October 2018 iv GLOSSARY, ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS A. GLOSSARY Concept Description Area of Direct Area that the activity directly affects based on physical, biotic and socioeconomic Influence characteristics. Area of Indirect Area affected by activities or influences not directly linked to the Project Influence but which are triggered by the physical presence of the Project or associated activities Area of Influence Area of Influence refers to the spatial or physical scale at which the impact may occur – it does not relate to the potential consequence of the impact Baseline A set of measurements, statistics, or conditions used as a basis for later comparison. The baseline refers to the pre- project conditions, prior to the initiation of the project, against which -project changes can be compared. Biodiversity The variability among living organisms – animals, plants, their habitats – from all sources including terrestrial, marine and other aquatic ecosystems, and the ecological complexes of which they are part. This includes diversity within species, between species, and of ecosystems. Refers to payment in cash or in kind for an asset to be acquired or affected by an infrastructure project at replacement cost. Compensation also involves more than a Compensation one-time payment process. It involves improvement or restoration of incomes and livelihoods. Cultural heritage The legacy of physical artefacts and intangible attributes of a group or society that are inherited from past generations,
Recommended publications
  • Joint Programme on Environment Mainstreaming and Adaptation to Climate Change Directly Contributes To
    Joint ProgrammeJoint onProgramme Environmental Mainstreaming on Environment and Adaptation Mainstreaming to Climate Change in Mozambique and Adaptation to Climate Change MOZAMBIQUE Prog/project Title: Joint Programme on Total estimated prog/project budget: Environment Mainstreaming and Adaptation USD 7,000,000 to Climate Change Out of which: 1. Planned resources: Programme/project Duration • Government (Start/end dates): Three years • Regular/Other Resources Jan 2008 – Dec 2010 • NGO or private • UN Org…. Fund Management: Pass Through • UN Org… • Donor … Managing or Administrative Agent: UNDP • Donor … The Joint Programme on Environment Mainstreaming and Adaptation to Climate Change directly contributes to: United Nations Development Assistance Framework (UNDAF) outcomes: 1. By 2009, Government and Civil Society Organizations capacity at national, provincial and local level, strengthened to plan, implement and monitor socio-economic development in a transparent, accountable, equitable and participatory way in order to achieve the MDGs; 4. Increased and more equitable economic opportunities to ensure sustainable livelihoods for women and men UNDAF outputs: 1.7 – Institutions responsible for the promotion of pro-poor and sustainable economic development strengthened; 4.1 – Efficient policies, plans, and strategies are ensured to promote equitable and sustainable economic development; 4.2 – Sustainable local economic development (rural and urban) enhanced. Joint Programme Outcomes: 1. Government, civil society, communities and other stakeholders informed, sensitized and empowered on environment and climate change issues; 2. Government capacity at central and decentralized levels to implement existing environment policies strengthened; 3. Climate proofing methodology mainstreamed into government development plans, UN / Donors’ programming and local stakeholders’ activities and investments; 4. Community coping mechanisms to climate change enhanced; 5.
    [Show full text]
  • In Mozambique Melq Gomes
    January 2014 Tracking Adaptation and Measuring Development (TAMD) in Mozambique Melq Gomes Q3 Report - Feasibility Testing Phase MOZAMBIQUE TAMD FEASIBILITY STUDY QUARTER THREE REPORT, 10/01/2014 Contents INTRODUCTION 2 STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS/KEY ENTRY POINTS 8 THEORY OF CHANGE ESTABLISHED 9 INDICATORS (TRACK 1 AND TRACK 2) AND METHODOLOGY 14 National level indicators 14 District level indicators 15 METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH 16 EMPIRICAL DATA COLLECTION (a) TRACK 1 (b) TRACK 2 16 CHALLENGES 17 CONCLUSIONS AND EMERGING LESSONS 17 ANNEXES 18 Annex 1: National level indicators 18 Annex 2: Guijá Field Work Report – Developing the ToC. 18 Annex 3: Draft of the workplan for Mozambique. 18 www.iied.org 1 MOZAMBIQUE TAMD FEASIBILITY STUDY QUARTER THREE REPORT, 10/01/2014 INTRODUCTION 1.1 - Mozambique Context Summary: Mozambique is the 8th most vulnerable country to climate change and is one of the poorest countries in the world with a high dependency on foreign aid. The population is primarily rural and dependent on agriculture, with 60% living on the coastline. Droughts, flooding and cyclones affect particular regions of the country and these are projected to increase in frequency and severity. The main institution for managing and coordinating climate change responses is the Ministry for Coordination of Environment Affairs (MICOA), the Ministry for Planning and Development also has a key role. New institutions have been proposed under the National Strategy on Climate Change but are not yet operational, it was approved in 2012. (Artur, Tellam 2012:8) Mozambique Climate Vulnerability and future project effects (Artur, Tellam 2012:9) Summary: The main risk/hazards in Mozambique are floods, droughts and cyclones with a very high level of current and future vulnerability in terms of exposure to floods and cyclones as more than 60% of the population lives along the coastline below 100 meters of altitude.
    [Show full text]
  • Download/Uj:40477/SOURCE1 (Accessed on 3 February 2021)
    sustainability Article Successes and Challenges in Sustainable Development Goals Localisation for Host Communities around Kruger National Park Mashudu Andra Mabibibi, Kaitano Dube * and Konanani Thwala Department of Tourism and Integrated Communication, Vaal University of Technology, Vanderbijlpark 1900, South Africa; [email protected] (M.A.M.); [email protected] (K.T.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +27-7-1009-6290 Abstract: Tourism has often been blamed for its unsustainable ways for a number of years now. Consequently, there have been efforts to ensure that tourism contributes to the host communities to address some of the sustainability challenges through responsible and sustainable tourism initiatives in the recent past. With less than nine years to go before the lapse of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), there is a need to take stock of how tourism enterprises such as national parks are contributing to the SDGs. This study examines how Kruger National Parks (KNP) is assisting the host communities in meeting the SDG goals and targets. The study made use of 30 in-depth key informant interviews, field observations and critical document analysis. The study found that regardless of the challenges it faces as an organization in partnering with host communities for developmental purposes, Kruger National Park has assisted communities to meet at least 15 out of the 17 SDGs. These span from social to economic, environmental and cultural SDGs. Since KNP’s projects address host community needs, several challenges need to be dealt with to ensure the sustainability of these projects post COVID-19 pandemic, which has undermined many nature tourism establishments Citation: Mabibibi, M.A.; Dube, K.; Thwala, K.
    [Show full text]
  • Charcoal Supply Chains from Mabalane to Maputo: Who Benefits?
    Energy for Sustainable Development 33 (2016) 129–138 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Energy for Sustainable Development Charcoal supply chains from Mabalane to Maputo: Who benefits? Sophia Baumert a,⁎, Ana Catarina Luz b,JanetFisherc, Frank Vollmer c, Casey M. Ryan c, Genevieve Patenaude c, Pedro Zorrilla-Miras c,LuisArtura, Isilda Nhantumbo d, Duncan Macqueen d a Universidade Eduardo Mondlane, Mozambique b cE3c – Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal c The University of Edinburgh, UK d International Institute for Environment and Development, UK article info abstract Article history: In urban centres of Mozambique, charcoal is the major energy source for cooking. Growing demand drives high Received 14 November 2015 wood extraction rates over increasing areas of miombo and mopane woodlands. Charcoal production can lead to Revised 13 May 2016 changes in ecosystem service provision and woodland degradation while also significantly contributing to rural Accepted 8 June 2016 income and, possibly, poverty alleviation. As such, understanding charcoal production and trade has important Available online xxxx implications for rural areas and for the sustainable development of woodland resources. Here, we investigate charcoal production and trade through empirical research conducted in Gaza Province, the main charcoal supply Keywords: Value chain analysis area for Maputo, Mozambique. Mopane woodland We analyse the present structure of the main charcoal supply chains from Gaza province to Maputo and the profit Licencing system distribution along them. Seven villages in the Mabalane district, Gaza, at different stages of engagement with the Mozambique charcoal industry, were selected for investigation. We conducted household surveys and semi-structured inter- Forest law views with key informants (village leaders, charcoal producers, licence holders, wholesalers, transporters and Community-based natural resource forest technicians), from May to October 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Projectos De Energias Renováveis Recursos Hídrico E Solar
    FUNDO DE ENERGIA Energia para todos para Energia CARTEIRA DE PROJECTOS DE ENERGIAS RENOVÁVEIS RECURSOS HÍDRICO E SOLAR RENEWABLE ENERGY PROJECTS PORTFÓLIO HYDRO AND SOLAR RESOURCES Edition nd 2 2ª Edição July 2019 Julho de 2019 DO POVO DOS ESTADOS UNIDOS NM ISO 9001:2008 FUNDO DE ENERGIA CARTEIRA DE PROJECTOS DE ENERGIAS RENOVÁVEIS RECURSOS HÍDRICO E SOLAR RENEWABLE ENERGY PROJECTS PORTFOLIO HYDRO AND SOLAR RESOURCES FICHA TÉCNICA COLOPHON Título Title Carteira de Projectos de Energias Renováveis - Recurso Renewable Energy Projects Portfolio - Hydro and Solar Hídrico e Solar Resources Redação Drafting Divisão de Estudos e Planificação Studies and Planning Division Coordenação Coordination Edson Uamusse Edson Uamusse Revisão Revision Filipe Mondlane Filipe Mondlane Impressão Printing Leima Impressões Originais, Lda Leima Impressões Originais, Lda Tiragem Print run 300 Exemplares 300 Copies Propriedade Property FUNAE – Fundo de Energia FUNAE – Energy Fund Publicação Publication 2ª Edição 2nd Edition Julho de 2019 July 2019 CARTEIRA DE PROJECTOS DE RENEWABLE ENERGY ENERGIAS RENOVÁVEIS PROJECTS PORTFOLIO RECURSOS HÍDRICO E SOLAR HYDRO AND SOLAR RESOURCES PREFÁCIO PREFACE O acesso universal a energia em 2030 será uma realidade no País, Universal access to energy by 2030 will be reality in this country, mercê do “Programa Nacional de Energia para Todos” lançado por thanks to the “National Energy for All Program” launched by Sua Excia Filipe Jacinto Nyusi, Presidente da República de Moçam- His Excellency Filipe Jacinto Nyusi, President of the
    [Show full text]
  • Proquest Dissertations
    ARE PEACE PARKS EFFECTIVE PEACEBUILDING TOOLS? EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF GREAT LIMPOPO TRANSFRONTIER PARK AS A REGIONAL STABILIZING AGENT By Julie E. Darnell Submitted to the Faculty of the School oflntemational Service of American University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts m Ethics, Peace, and Global Affuirs Chair: ~~~Christos K yrou 1 lw') w Louis Goodman, Dean I tacfi~ \ Date 2008 American University Washington, D.C. 20016 AMERICAN UNIVERSITY LIBRARY UMI Number: 1458244 Copyright 2008 by Darnell, Julie E. All rights reserved. INFORMATION TO USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. ® UMI UM I M icroform 1458244 Copyright 2008 by ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 E. Eisenhower Parkway PO Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 ©COPYRIGHT by Julie E. Darnell 2008 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ARE PEACE PARKS EFFECTIVE PEACEBUILDING TOOLS? EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF THE GREAT LIMPOPO TRANSFRONTIER PARK AS A REGIONAL STABILIZING AGENT BY Julie E. Darnell ABSTRACT In recent decades peace parks and transboundary parks in historically unstable regions have become popular solutions to addressing development, conservation and security goals.
    [Show full text]
  • Adaptation to Climate Change in Semi-Arid Environments of Mozambique
    ENVIRONMENTENVIRONMENT [CLIMATE AND NATURAL CHANGE] RESOURCESBIOENERGY MANAGEMENTMONITORING AND ASSESSMENT SERIES(1) Front cover photosLeft: FAO Mozambique Middle: FAO Mozambique J.7 Right: FAO Mozambique Back cover photosLeft: FAO Mozambique /diddle: FAO Mozambique Right FAO Mozambique Background image in this pageIllustration elaborated from "L'Encyclopedie Diderot et D'Alembert" Copies of FA0 publications can be requested fromSales and Marketing Group - Communication Division Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Viale delle Terme di Caracalla -00153 Rome, Italy E-mail:[email protected] Fax:(+39) 06 57053360 Web slte:http://www.fao.org Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Mozambique Experience and Lessons from Environments Change in Semi-Arid Adaptation to Climate Mozambique Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Maputo, Andrew Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome, Italy Alemneh OneWorld Sustainable Investments, Cape Town, South Africa Stephanie M D attick M ejene idgley G M overnment of ozambique Rome, 2012 19 ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT SERIES ENVIRONME NT [ CLIMATE CHANGE ] BIOENERGY MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidance Notes for Preparing Livelihood Zone Profiles
    LIVELIHOODS BASELINE PROFILES Limpopo Basin, Mozambique A SPECIAL REPORT BY THE FAMINE EARLY WARNING SYSTEMS NETWORK (FEWS NET) May 2011 1 LIVELIHOODS BASELINE PROFILES Limpopo Basin, Mozambique A SPECIAL REPORT BY THE FAMINE EARLY WARNING SYSTEMS NETWORK (FEWS NET) May 2011 The authors’ views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. 2 Contents Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Sorghum Dominant Semi Arid Interior Livelihood Zone................................................................................ 5 Maize Dominant Semi-Arid Interior Livelihood Zone .................................................................................. 11 Upper Limpopo Riverine Chicualacuala/Mabalane Livelihood Zone .......................................................... 19 Upper Limpopo Massingir Riverine Livelihood Zone ................................................................................... 25 Lower Limpopo Baixa Non Irrigation Scheme Livelihood Zone ................................................................... 32 Lower Limpopo Baixa Irrigation Livelihood Zone ........................................................................................ 39 Lower Limpopo Alta Cassava Livelihood Zone ............................................................................................ 46 Lower
    [Show full text]
  • Parque Nacionale Do Limpopo AERIAL WILDLIFE CENSUS 1
    2010 Parque Nacionale do Limpopo AERIAL WILDLIFE CENSUS Alan Stephenson Wildlife Management Services 0 Index Introduction……………………………………………………………………………… 1 Methodology……………………………………………………………………………… 2 Results ……………………………………………………………………………………. 5 Statistical Analysis ………………………………………………………………………. 6 Maps ……………………………………………………………………………………… 7 Discussion ………………………………………………………………………………. 37 Acknowledgements …………………………………………………………………….. 38 References ……………………………………………………………………………… 39 Wildlife Management Services | Parque Nacionale do Limpopo AERIAL WILDLIFE CENSUS 1 Introduction Boma Helicopters of Grahamstown were contacted by staff of the Parque Nacionale do Limpopo to do a helicopter and/or a fixed wing aircraft wildlife survey of the Park. Previously there has been no complete aerial census of Parque Nacionale do Limpopo (Limpopo National Park or PNL) in Mozambique. Three partial surveys were conducted prior to this survey, two in the south western region (Whyte 2004, Hofmeyr 2005) and a fixed wing survey of the Shingwedzi Basin using the Kruger National Park Cessna 206 (Whyte & Swanepoel 2006). Due to the high costs of using a helicopter and the large size of the Park (1.1 million ha) it was decided to use a fixed wing aircraft and only survey 30% of the park to contain costs. All large mammal species were recorded as well as burnt areas, domestic stock, villages and any other information that could be of value. Large raptor nests, Crested Guinea Fowl and Ground Hornbill were also included in the survey. Baboons were recorded as single troops. Methodology A six seat Cessna 210 Centurion RG was used due to its ability to operate off relatively short unpaved runways. The seating included the pilot in the front left seat, data capture and controller in the front right seat and four observers in the rear seats.
    [Show full text]
  • Parque Nacional De Banhine, Mocambique
    Parque Nacional de Banhine, Moçambique Wildlife survey December 2007 Technical report commissioned by ACTF - MITUR Projecto Áreas de Conservação Transfronteira e Desenvolvimento do Turismo (ACTFDT) Ministério do Turismo REPÚBLICA DE MOÇAMBIQUE Enquiries: Dr Bartolomeu Soto Service provider International Conservation Services Agricultural Research Council - Range & Forage Unit Sunrise Aviation Dr M Stalmans PO Box 19139 NELSPRUIT 1200 South Africa [email protected] Contract number: UC-ACTF/029/07 - Grant number: TF 056038MOZ Contents Page Executive summary 3 1. Background 5 2. Methodology 5 2.1. General approach 5 2.2. Survey technique 7 2.3. Data analysis 9 3. Results 11 3.1. Area covered 11 3.2. Species observed 13 3.3. Numbers observed 15 3.4. Population structure 16 3.5. Replicate observations 16 4. Discussion of numbers and distribution 18 4.4. Landscape and area preferences 18 4.2. Comparison between 2004 and 2007 25 4.3. Current densities in the context of carrying capacity 27 5. Illegal hunting and wood cutting 27 6. Park rehabilitation 29 7. Conclusion 29 8. References 30 Appendix A: Technical specifications for the study (as defined by MITUR). 31 Appendix B: Scientific, English and Portugese names of wildlife observed 32 during the game survey of Parque Nacional de Banhine during October- November 2007. Parque Nacional de Banhine - Wildlife survey 2007 2 Executive summary A wildlife survey was undertaken during October-November 2007 of the Parque Nacional de Banhine as a follow-up from the survey undertaken during 2004. Balancing the requirements for objectivity, repeatability and affordability, a partial survey (sample count) was applied with a helicopter using the same survey blocks used in 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • Appraisal of the Potential for Rhino Conservation in Mozambique
    APPRAISAL OF THE POTENTIAL FOR RHINO CONSERVATION IN MOZAMBIQUE Kevin M. Dunham Detailed Evaluation of Feasibility and Reintroduction Options for Rhinos in Limpopo National Park Scoping Evaluation of Feasibility and Reintroduction Options for Rhinos in Zinave National Park and Gile Game Reserve Preliminary Guidelines for the Development of a Rhino Conservation Policy for Mozambique Semester 9 Task 1.2-8.1 April 2004 SADC Regional Programme for Rhino Conservation Harare Appraisal of the Potential for Rhino Conservation in Mozambique Summary • Prior to the European exploration of Africa, the white rhino was found in Mozambique south of the Zambezi River and the black rhino was found throughout the country. • During 1870, both the white rhino and the black rhino were reported west of the Limpopo River, between its confluences with the Elefantes and Nuanetsi Rivers. But by the late 1950s, excessive hunting had caused the extinction of the white rhino in Mozambique and the black rhino was extinct south of the Save River. During the 1960s and 1970s, a few rhinos entered Coutada 16 from South Africa and Zimbabwe. • Coutada 16 was proclaimed Limpopo National Park (NP) during November 2001. It is part of the Great Limpopo Transfrontier Park, which includes Kruger NP in South Africa and Gonarezhou NP in Zimbabwe. The development of Limpopo NP is being funded by an initial grant of 6 million euros secured by the Peace Parks Foundation (PPF) from the German Development Bank. • During 2002 and 2003, approximately 2000 animals of a variety of species, including two white rhinos, were released into a fenced, 350 km2 sanctuary in the south-west of Limpopo NP.
    [Show full text]
  • Adaptive Governance for a Changing Climate: Government, Communities
    ACCRA CASE STUDY JUNE 2017 ADAPTIVE GOVERNANCE FOR A CHANGING CLIMATE Government, communities and others working collaboratively in Mozambique to transform climate adaptation planning systems Community members validating their local adaptation plan with district government officials and ACCRA team in Guija district, Mozambique. Photo: Thomas White In Mozambique, climate change has been increasing the vulnerability of rural and urban communities. Droughts, floods and cyclones are more frequent and severe, and sea- levels continue to rise – and the situation is likely to worsen. This has undermined the government’s efforts to achieve its goal of reducing extreme poverty. The approval of the new National Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation Strategy (ENAMMC) in 2012 presented an important opportunity for ACCRA to advise the Government of Mozambique and ultimately to effect systemic and institutional change in planning for climate change adaptation. ACCRA also supported MITADER, which is responsible for operationalizing the strategy, with tools, resources and advice on processes. This story of change was developed following an external evaluation of ACCRA’s work in Mozambique, through a series of interviews and a learning history workshop held in October 2016 in Maputo. CONTENTS About ACCRA ............................................................................................................ 3 About this story of change ........................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 1 The context and key actors: mozambique
    [Show full text]