Hydrodynamic and Phylogenetic Aspects of the Adipose Fin in Fishes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hydrodynamic and Phylogenetic Aspects of the Adipose Fin in Fishes 910 Hydrodynamic and phylogenetic aspects of the adipose fin in fishes T.E. Reimchen and N.F. Temple Abstract: The adipose fin on fishes is a highly conserved and enigmatic, small, non-rayed fin that has persisted from the Mesozoic on some basal teleosts such as salmonids. Using juvenile steelhead, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum, 1792), ranging from 5 to 18 cm standard length, we experimentally test the effects of adipose fin removal on swim- ming performance in a variable velocity flow chamber and quantify, with seven independent trials, amplitude and fre- quency of caudal fin movement at multiple flow velocities (range 10–39 cm·s–1). Results demonstrate that adipose fin removal on smolts produces an average 8% (range –3% to 23%) increase in caudal fin amplitude relative to unclipped fish across all velocities. However, we observed no effects in trials with smaller fish (<7 cm) or larger fish (>12 cm). Consistent with speculations in the literature, our results show that the adipose fin may function to control vortices en- veloping the caudal fin during swimming or, alternatively, function as a passive precaudal sensor of turbulent flow. Phylogenetic persistence of this trait among multiple groups of early bony fishes is probably due to its hydrodynamic attributes rather than developmental constraints, and the current widespread practice in fisheries of removing the adi- pose fin as a marking technique may have significant biological costs. Résumé : La nageoire adipeuse chez les poissons est une petite nageoire sans rayons qui est énigmatique, mais forte- ment conservée au cours de l’évolution, car elle persiste depuis le mésozoïque chez quelques téléostéens primitifs, tels que les salmonidés. Nous avons vérifié expérimentalement les effets de l’ablation de la nageoire adipeuse sur la perfor- mance de la nage chez de jeunes truites arc-en-ciel anadromes, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum, 1792), de longueur standard de5à18cmdans une enceinte à débit variable; nous avons quantifié, dans sept essais indépendants, l’amplitude et la fréquence des mouvements de la nageoire caudale dans une gamme de plusieurs vitesses de courant (étendue 10–39 cm·s–1). Les résultats indiquent que l’ablation de la nageoire adipeuse chez les saumoneaux cause un accroissement moyen de 8 % (étendue de –3%à23%)del’amplitudedumouvementdelanageoire caudale, par comparaison à des poissons ayant conservé leur nageoire adipeuse, et ce à toutes les vitesses de courant. Cependant, il n’y a aucun effet discernable chez les poissons plus petits (<7 cm) ou plus grands (>12 cm). En accord avec les spécu- lations trouvées dans la littérature, nos résultats montrent que la nageoire adipeuse peut servir à contrôler les tourbil- lons qui entourent la nageoire caudale durant la nage; elle peut aussi servir de senseur passif du débit turbulent en position pré-caudale. La persistance au cours de l’évolution de ce caractère chez de nombreux groupes de poissons os- seux primitifs s’explique probablement par ses qualités hydrodynamiques, plutôt que par des contraintes de développe- ment. La pratique courante et répandue d’enlever la nageoire adipeuse comme technique de marquage peut probablement entraîner des coûts biologiques significatifs. [Traduit par la Rédaction] Reimchen and Temple 916 Introduction non-rayed fin usually located medially between the dorsal and caudal fins and has a very restricted taxonomic occur- Small plesiomorphic and seemingly trivial structures orig- rence (Nelson 1994). It occurs among eight extant groups inating in ancestral forms and persisting through extended of basal euteleosts (Fig. 1), including the Characiformes geological periods provide a continued focus for discussion (characins), the Siluriformes (catfish), the Salmoniformes on the role of conserved characters in evolution. Persistence (salmonids), and the Myctophiformes (lanternfish); and within can result from developmental constraints (Schlichting and some of these groups, the adipose fin is variable in expres- Pigliucci 1998) or comprise an evolutionary trade-off be- sion among closely related taxa. It is uniformly absent in all tween constraints and functionality (Futuyma 1998; Galis et modern teleosts. No function has yet been identified for this al. 2001). The adipose fin of fishes is an enigmatic, small, small fin and it represents an important trait for distinguish- ing major taxonomic groups and affinities (Helfman et al. 1997). Received 15 November 2003. Accepted 21 May 2004. Published on the NRC Research Press Web site at The small size of the adipose fin and its passive motion http://cjz.nrc.ca on 12 August 2004. during swimming appear to limit its role in stability, drag, or 1 thrust, which are the major functions of medial fins in fishes T.E. Reimchen and N.F. Temple. Department of (Webb 1975; Aleyev 1977). It may simply be a phylogenetic Biology, University of Victoria, PO Box 3020, Victoria, vestige of a formerly larger posterior dorsal fin (Sandon BC V8W 3N5, Canada. 1956; Kosswig 1965) that has persisted among extant groups 1Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]). owing to epistatic effects and constraints (for review see Can. J. Zool. 82: 910–916 (2004) doi: 10.1139/Z04-069 © 2004 NRC Canada Reimchen and Temple 911 Fig. 1. Abbreviated phylogeny of Teleostei (modified from Nelson 1994). Taxa with an adipose fin shown with bold lines. Representa- tive adipose fin shown on salmon illustration (reproduced with permission from S.D. Douglas). Schlichting and Pigliucci 1998). Gosline (1971) suggests 1999), and it seems probable that over the 70+ million years that the adipose fin may be important in juvenile age classes of history of the groups there would be sufficient variability for generating a dorsal thrust vector symmetrical to that of to favor further reduction in size or elimination of the adi- the ventral anal fin during swimming. Webb (1975), Aleyev pose fin if it was metabolically costly to produce. Secondly, (1977), and Blake (1983) speculate that the adipose fin may any medial appendage would not persist from the Mesozoic influence vortices and flow regime to the caudal fin and po- to the present in multiple taxonomic groups unless it pro- tentially reduce cross-flow and boundary layer separation vided a benefit that offset the presumed drag-related costs. around the caudal peduncle just like the dorsal and ventral Thirdly, in salmon and trout, there is sexual dimorphism in finlets of tuna-like fishes. The position and passive nature of the size of the adipose fin (Beacham and Murray 1983) that the adipose fin could be equivalent to the 5th finlet of scom- is accentuated prior to migration up the spawning rivers brids, which redirects cross-peduncular flow during steady (Beacham and Murray 1986). In this paper, we present new swimming (Nauen and Lauder 2001). Whatever the function experimental evidence that adipose fin removal on juvenile of the adipose fin might be, the benefits are thought to be salmonid results in reduced swimming efficiency relative to small and, as in juvenile salmonids in Europe and North control fish in flow chambers across multiple flow veloci- America, the routine clipping of the adipose fin is the domi- ties. nant marking technique in fisheries science (Hammer and Blankenship 2001). Materials and methods Several lines of evidence encouraged us to further develop some of the speculations regarding the functionality of the To evaluate swimming behaviour, we videotaped using a adipose fin. Firstly, there is size variation in the adipose fin Sony Handycam at 30 frames/s swimming juvenile steel- within species (Martinez 1984; Nelson 1994; Petersson et al. head, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum, 1792), in a rectangu- © 2004 NRC Canada 912 Can. J. Zool. Vol. 82, 2004 Table 1. Trial characteristics of protocol and results. Trial Protocol A B C D E F G Number of fish 9 21 11 10 16 8 37 Mean standard length 11.8 (10.3–13.3) 8.5 (7.3–9.6) 11.0 (8.1–12.8) 10.7 (8.0–12.9) 16.4 (13.9–17.9) 6.7 (6.0–7.6) 5.4 (4.5–6.2) (cm) (range) Flow velocity 9.7, 11.3, 15.6, 9.7, 11.3, 15.8 and 27.1 17.4 and 27.6 21.8, 31.7, 13.1, 14.8, 15.8, 10.4 and 14.7 categories (cm·s–1) 20.3, and 15.6, 20.3, 36.7, and 18.7, 21.8, 25.3 and 25.3 39.2 and 27.1 Protocol differences MS222 MS222 Temperature Temperature Temperature Temperature Temperature controlled;* controlled;* controlled;* controlled;* controlled;* MS222; fish eugenol; eugenol eugenol; MS222; restricted to turbulent small fish includes injury the front of flow regime treatment group the chamber introduced Average percent change 17 (13–23) 17 (16–18) –1 (–3 to 1) 10 (9–12) 3 (–3 to 6) 1 (0–5) 0 (–1 to 0) in amplitude† (range) Significance P < 0.001 P < 0.001 P = 0.77 P = 0.002 P = 0.02 P = 0.25 P = 0.81 Note: MS-222 and eugenol were the anaesthetics used in the trials. *Temperature was controlled using a cooling unit (Universal Marine Industry Inc., San Leandro, California) and a pump to maintain water temperature at 12 ± 1 °C. †Relative increase in amplitude among clipped fish relative to the fishes in the control group after treatment. lar plexiglass flow chamber (96 cm long × 10 cm wide × for recovery (range 48–56 h). After this duration, arbitrarily 15 cm high) over seven trials. Water turbulence from the chosen fishes were individually placed in the flow chamber, pump was greatly reduced by forcing water through two se- identified from pigmentation, and videotaped at each of the quential plates of thin tubes (20 mm long, 2 mm diameter) at velocity categories. Experiments were replicated after 24 h. the entrance of the flow chamber. A 2.5-mm grid was placed We analyzed swimming behaviour on video-playback on a on the underside of the flow chamber against which each high-resolution monitor (73.7-cm RCA Colortrak).
Recommended publications
  • Edna Assay Development
    Environmental DNA assays available for species detection via qPCR analysis at the U.S.D.A Forest Service National Genomics Center for Wildlife and Fish Conservation (NGC). Asterisks indicate the assay was designed at the NGC. This list was last updated in June 2021 and is subject to change. Please contact [email protected] with questions. Family Species Common name Ready for use? Mustelidae Martes americana, Martes caurina American and Pacific marten* Y Castoridae Castor canadensis American beaver Y Ranidae Lithobates catesbeianus American bullfrog Y Cinclidae Cinclus mexicanus American dipper* N Anguillidae Anguilla rostrata American eel Y Soricidae Sorex palustris American water shrew* N Salmonidae Oncorhynchus clarkii ssp Any cutthroat trout* N Petromyzontidae Lampetra spp. Any Lampetra* Y Salmonidae Salmonidae Any salmonid* Y Cottidae Cottidae Any sculpin* Y Salmonidae Thymallus arcticus Arctic grayling* Y Cyrenidae Corbicula fluminea Asian clam* N Salmonidae Salmo salar Atlantic Salmon Y Lymnaeidae Radix auricularia Big-eared radix* N Cyprinidae Mylopharyngodon piceus Black carp N Ictaluridae Ameiurus melas Black Bullhead* N Catostomidae Cycleptus elongatus Blue Sucker* N Cichlidae Oreochromis aureus Blue tilapia* N Catostomidae Catostomus discobolus Bluehead sucker* N Catostomidae Catostomus virescens Bluehead sucker* Y Felidae Lynx rufus Bobcat* Y Hylidae Pseudocris maculata Boreal chorus frog N Hydrocharitaceae Egeria densa Brazilian elodea N Salmonidae Salvelinus fontinalis Brook trout* Y Colubridae Boiga irregularis Brown tree snake*
    [Show full text]
  • (Siluriformes: Diplomystidae) in Coastal River Basins of Chile and Its Implications for Conservation
    Neotropical Ichthyology Original article https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0224-2019-0073 A Century after! Rediscovery of the ancient catfish Diplomystes Bleeker 1858 (Siluriformes: Diplomystidae) in coastal river basins of Chile and its implications for conservation Carlos P. Muñoz-Ramírez1,2, Raul Briones3, Nicole Colin4, Correspondence: Pablo Fierro5, Konrad Górski2,5, Alfonso Jara6 and Carlos P. Muñoz-Ramírez 6 [email protected] Aliro Manosalva The ancient catfish family Diplomystidae, with seven species endemic to rivers of southern South America, represents one of the oldest branches of the diverse order Siluriformes. With most species endangered, new reports of these species become extremely valuable for conservation. Currently, it is assumed that Diplomystes species inhabit only Andean (large) basins, and that they are extinct from coastal (small) basins from which their presence have not been recorded since 1919. Here, we document new records of the family Diplomystidae in the Laraquete and Carampangue basins, two coastal basins from the Nahuelbuta Coast Range, Chile, with no previous reports. This finding represents the rediscovery of the genus in coastal basins in more than a Century. Based on analysis of mitochondrial DNA sequences, the collected specimens were found to be closely related to Diplomystes nahuelbutaensis from the Andean Biobío Basin, but sufficiently differentiated to suggest that coastal basin populations are a different management unit. These populations are important because, contrary to previous thoughts, they prove these catfish can survive in small river networks, providing unique opportunities for research and conservation. The conservation category of Critically Endangered (CE) is recommended for the Submitted July 26, 2019 populations from the Laraquete and Carampangue basins.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology and Conservation of Mudminnow Species Worldwide
    FEATURE Ecology and Conservation of Mudminnow Species Worldwide Lauren M. Kuehne Ecología y conservación a nivel mundial School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 de los lucios RESUMEN: en este trabajo, se revisa y resume la ecología Julian D. Olden y estado de conservación del grupo de peces comúnmente School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Box conocido como “lucios” (anteriormente conocidos como 355020, Seattle, WA 98195, and Australian Rivers Institute, Griffith Uni- la familia Umbridae, pero recientemente reclasificados en versity, QLD, 4111, Australia. E-mail: [email protected] la Esocidae) los cuales se constituyen de sólo cinco espe- cies distribuidas en tres continentes. Estos peces de cuerpo ABSTRACT: We review and summarize the ecology and con- pequeño —que viven en hábitats de agua dulce y presentan servation status of the group of fishes commonly known as movilidad limitada— suelen presentar poblaciones aisla- “mudminnows” (formerly known as the family Umbridae but das a lo largo de distintos paisajes y son sujetos a las típi- recently reclassified as Esocidae), consisting of only five species cas amenazas que enfrentan las especies endémicas que distributed on three continents. These small-bodied fish—resid- se encuentran en contacto directo con los impactos antro- ing in freshwater habitats and exhibiting limited mobility—often pogénicos como la contaminación, alteración de hábitat occur in isolated populations across landscapes and are subject e introducción de especies no nativas. Aquí se resume el to conservation threats common to highly endemic species in conocimiento actual acerca de la distribución, relaciones close contact with anthropogenic impacts, such as pollution, filogenéticas, ecología y estado de conservación de cada habitat alteration, and nonnative species introductions.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Pike Esox Lucius ILLINOIS RANGE
    northern pike Esox lucius Kingdom: Animalia FEATURES Phylum: Chordata The northern pike's average life span is eight to 10 Class: Osteichthyes years. The average weight is two pounds. It may Order: Esociformes attain a maximum length of 53 inches. The fins are rounded, and all except the pectoral fins have dark Family: Esocidae spots. Scales are present on the cheek and half of ILLINOIS STATUS the gill cover. The eyes are yellow. The long, green body has yellow spots on the sides. The belly is common, native white to dark yellow. The duckbill-shaped snout is easily seen. BEHAVIORS The northern pike lives in lakes, rivers and marshes. It prefers water without strong currents and with many plants. This fish reaches maturity at age two to three years. Spawning occurs in March. The female deposits up to 150,000 eggs that are scattered in marshy areas or other shallow water areas. Eggs hatch in 12-14 days. This fish eats fishes, insects, crayfish, frogs and reptiles. ILLINOIS RANGE © Illinois Department of Natural Resources. 2020. Biodiversity of Illinois. Unless otherwise noted, photos and images © Illinois Department of Natural Resources. close up of head close up of side © Illinois Department of Natural Resources. 2020. Biodiversity of Illinois. Unless otherwise noted, photos and images © Illinois Department of Natural Resources. © Engbretson Underwater Photography adult Aquatic Habitats lakes, ponds and reservoirs; rivers and streams; marshes Woodland Habitats none Prairie and Edge Habitats none © Illinois Department of Natural Resources. 2020. Biodiversity of Illinois. Unless otherwise noted, photos and images © Illinois Department of Natural Resources..
    [Show full text]
  • Esox Lucius) Ecological Risk Screening Summary
    Northern Pike (Esox lucius) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, February 2019 Web Version, 8/26/2019 Photo: Ryan Hagerty/USFWS. Public Domain – Government Work. Available: https://digitalmedia.fws.gov/digital/collection/natdiglib/id/26990/rec/22. (February 1, 2019). 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range From Froese and Pauly (2019a): “Circumpolar in fresh water. North America: Atlantic, Arctic, Pacific, Great Lakes, and Mississippi River basins from Labrador to Alaska and south to Pennsylvania and Nebraska, USA [Page and Burr 2011]. Eurasia: Caspian, Black, Baltic, White, Barents, Arctic, North and Aral Seas and Atlantic basins, southwest to Adour drainage; Mediterranean basin in Rhône drainage and northern Italy. Widely distributed in central Asia and Siberia easward [sic] to Anadyr drainage (Bering Sea basin). Historically absent from Iberian Peninsula, Mediterranean France, central Italy, southern and western Greece, eastern Adriatic basin, Iceland, western Norway and northern Scotland.” Froese and Pauly (2019a) list Esox lucius as native in Armenia, Azerbaijan, China, Georgia, Iran, Kazakhstan, Mongolia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Albania, Austria, Belgium, Bosnia Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Macedonia, Moldova, Monaco, 1 Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, Ukraine, Canada, and the United States (including Alaska). From Froese and Pauly (2019a): “Occurs in Erqishi river and Ulungur lake [in China].” “Known from the Selenge drainage [in Mongolia] [Kottelat 2006].” “[In Turkey:] Known from the European Black Sea watersheds, Anatolian Black Sea watersheds, Central and Western Anatolian lake watersheds, and Gulf watersheds (Firat Nehri, Dicle Nehri).
    [Show full text]
  • Redfin Pickerel
    Maine 2015 Wildlife Action Plan Revision Report Date: January 13, 2016 Esox americanus americanus (Redfin Pickerel) Priority 2 Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN) Class: Actinopterygii (Ray-finned Fishes) Order: Esociformes (Pikes And Mudminnows) Family: Esocidae (Pikes) General comments: none Species Conservation Range Maps for Redfin Pickerel: Town Map: Esox americanus americanus_Towns.pdf Subwatershed Map: Esox americanus americanus_HUC12.pdf SGCN Priority Ranking - Designation Criteria: Risk of Extirpation: Maine Status: Endangered State Special Concern or NMFS Species of Concern: NA Recent Significant Declines: NA Regional Endemic: NA High Regional Conservation Priority: NA High Climate Change Vulnerability: NA Understudied rare taxa: NA Historical: NA Culturally Significant: NA Habitats Assigned to Redfin Pickerel: Formation Name Freshwater Aquatic Macrogroup Name Lakes and Ponds Habitat System Name: Eutrophic **Primary Habitat** Macrogroup Name Rivers and Streams Habitat System Name: Headwaters and Creeks **Primary Habitat** Notes: Coastal Stream/River Habitat System Name: Small River **Primary Habitat** Notes: Coastal Stream/River Formation Name Intertidal Macrogroup Name Intertidal Water Column Habitat System Name: Confined Channel Notes: migration corridor Stressors Assigned to Redfin Pickerel: Moderate Severity High Severity Highly Actionable Medium-High High Stressor Priority Level based on Moderately Actionable Medium Medium-High Severity and Actionability Actionable with Difficulty Low Low IUCN Level 1 Threat Pollution
    [Show full text]
  • History of Fishes - Structural Patterns and Trends in Diversification
    History of fishes - Structural Patterns and Trends in Diversification AGNATHANS = Jawless • Class – Pteraspidomorphi • Class – Myxini?? (living) • Class – Cephalaspidomorphi – Osteostraci – Anaspidiformes – Petromyzontiformes (living) Major Groups of Agnathans • 1. Osteostracida 2. Anaspida 3. Pteraspidomorphida • Hagfish and Lamprey = traditionally together in cyclostomata Jaws = GNATHOSTOMES • Gnathostomes: the jawed fishes -good evidence for gnathostome monophyly. • 4 major groups of jawed vertebrates: Extinct Acanthodii and Placodermi (know) Living Chondrichthyes and Osteichthyes • Living Chondrichthyans - usually divided into Selachii or Elasmobranchi (sharks and rays) and Holocephali (chimeroids). • • Living Osteichthyans commonly regarded as forming two major groups ‑ – Actinopterygii – Ray finned fish – Sarcopterygii (coelacanths, lungfish, Tetrapods). • SARCOPTERYGII = Coelacanths + (Dipnoi = Lung-fish) + Rhipidistian (Osteolepimorphi) = Tetrapod Ancestors (Eusthenopteron) Close to tetrapods Lungfish - Dipnoi • Three genera, Africa+Australian+South American ACTINOPTERYGII Bichirs – Cladistia = POLYPTERIFORMES Notable exception = Cladistia – Polypterus (bichirs) - Represented by 10 FW species - tropical Africa and one species - Erpetoichthys calabaricus – reedfish. Highly aberrant Cladistia - numerous uniquely derived features – long, independent evolution: – Strange dorsal finlets, Series spiracular ossicles, Peculiar urohyal bone and parasphenoid • But retain # primitive Actinopterygian features = heavy ganoid scales (external
    [Show full text]
  • Global Catfish Biodiversity 17
    American Fisheries Society Symposium 77:15–37, 2011 © 2011 by the American Fisheries Society Global Catfi sh Biodiversity JONATHAN W. ARMBRUSTER* Department of Biological Sciences, Auburn University 331 Funchess, Auburn University, Alabama 36849, USA Abstract.—Catfi shes are a broadly distributed order of freshwater fi shes with 3,407 cur- rently valid species. In this paper, I review the different clades of catfi shes, all catfi sh fami- lies, and provide information on some of the more interesting aspects of catfi sh biology that express the great diversity that is present in the order. I also discuss the results of the widely successful All Catfi sh Species Inventory Project. Introduction proximately 10.8% of all fi shes and 5.5% of all ver- tebrates are catfi shes. Renowned herpetologist and ecologist Archie Carr’s But would every one be able to identify the 1941 parody of dichotomous keys, A Subjective Key loricariid catfi sh Pseudancistrus pectegenitor as a to the Fishes of Alachua County, Florida, begins catfi sh (Figure 2A)? It does not have scales, but it with “Any damn fool knows a catfi sh.” Carr is right does have bony plates. It is very fl at, and its mouth but only in part. Catfi shes (the Siluriformes) occur has long jaws but could not be called large. There is on every continent (even fossils are known from a barbel, but you might not recognize it as one as it Antarctica; Figure 1); and the order is extremely is just a small extension of the lip. There are spines well supported by numerous complex synapomor- at the front of the dorsal and pectoral fi ns, but they phies (shared, derived characteristics; Fink and are not sharp like in the typical catfi sh.
    [Show full text]
  • Life History Patterns and Biogeography: An
    LIFE HISTORY PATTERNS AND Lynne R. Parenti2 BIOGEOGRAPHY: AN INTERPRETATION OF DIADROMY IN FISHES1 ABSTRACT Diadromy, broadly defined here as the regular movement between freshwater and marine habitats at some time during their lives, characterizes numerous fish and invertebrate taxa. Explanations for the evolution of diadromy have focused on ecological requirements of individual taxa, rarely reflecting a comparative, phylogenetic component. When incorporated into phylogenetic studies, center of origin hypotheses have been used to infer dispersal routes. The occurrence and distribution of diadromy throughout fish (aquatic non-tetrapod vertebrate) phylogeny are used here to interpret the evolution of this life history pattern and demonstrate the relationship between life history and ecology in cladistic biogeography. Cladistic biogeography has been mischaracterized as rejecting ecology. On the contrary, cladistic biogeography has been explicit in interpreting ecology or life history patterns within the broader framework of phylogenetic patterns. Today, in inferred ancient life history patterns, such as diadromy, we see remnants of previously broader distribution patterns, such as antitropicality or bipolarity, that spanned both marine and freshwater habitats. Biogeographic regions that span ocean basins and incorporate ocean margins better explain the relationship among diadromy, its evolution, and its distribution than do biogeographic regions centered on continents. Key words: Antitropical distributions, biogeography, diadromy, eels,
    [Show full text]
  • Cephalochordata, Chordata)
    © Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/; www.zoologicalbulletin.de; www.biologiezentrum.at ( MICROSCOPIC ANATOMY OF DEVELOPMENTAL STAGES OF BRANCHIOSTOMA LANCEOLATUM (CEPHALOCHORDATA, CHORDATA) by Thomas Stach ^ 8 20(J4 BONNER ZOOLOGISCHE MONOGRAPHIEN, Nr. 47 2000 Herausgeber: ZOOLOGISCHES FORSCHUNGSINSTITUT UND MUSEUM A. KOENIG BONN © Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/; www.zoologicalbulletin.de; www.biologiezentrum.at BONNER ZOOLOGISCHE MONOGRAPHIEN Die Serie wird vom Zoologischen Forschungsinstitut und Museum Alexander Koenig herausgegeben und bringt Originalarbeiten, die für eine Unterbringung in den „Bonner zoologischen Beiträgen" zu lang sind und eine Veröffentlichung als Monographie rechtfertigen. Anfragen bezüglich der Vorlage von Manuskripten sind an die Schriftleitung zu richten; Bestellungen und Tauschangebote bitte an die Bibliothek des Instituts. This series of monographs, published by the Alexander Koenig Research Institute and Museum of Zoology, has been established for original contributions too long for inclu- sion in „Bonner zoologische Beiträge". Correspondence concerning manuscripts for publication should be addressed to the editor. Purchase orders and requests for exchange please address to the library of the institute. LTnstitut de Recherches Zoologiques et Museum Alexander Koenig a etabli cette serie de monographies pour pouvoir publier des travaux zoologiques trop longs pour etre inclus dans les „Bonner zoologische Beiträge". Toute correspondance concemante
    [Show full text]
  • Bullockia Maldonadoi ERSS
    Bullockia maldonadoi (a catfish, no common name) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, April 2015 Revised, October 2017, November 2017 Web Version, 9/10/2018 Photo: Johannes Schoeffmann. Licensed under Creative Commons BY 3.0. Available: http://www.fishbase.se/photos/UploadedBy.php?autoctr=26304&win=uploaded. (October 16, 2017). 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range From Froese and Pauly (2017): “South America: Chile.” 1 From Dyer (2000): “Bullockia maldonadoi Is another endemic taxon to the Chilean Province (ARRATIA et al.1978) […]” Status in the United States No records of Bullockia maldonadoi in the wild or in trade in the United States were found. Means of Introductions in the United States No records of Bullockia maldonadoi in the United States were found. Remarks No additional remarks. 2 Biology and Ecology Taxonomic Hierarchy and Taxonomic Standing According to Eschmeyer et al. (2017), Bullockia maldonadoi (Eigenmann 1920) is the valid name for this species. It was originally described as Hatcheria maldonadoi. From ITIS (2015): “Kingdom Animalia Subkingdom Bilateria Infrakingdom Deuterostomia Phylum Chordata Subphylum Vertebrata Infraphylum Gnathostomata Superclass Osteichthyes Class Actinopterygii Subclass Neopterygii Infraclass Teleostei Superorder Ostariophysi Order Siluriformes Family Trichomycteridae Subfamily Trichomycterinae Genus Bullockia Species Bullockia maldonadoi (Eigenmann, 1928)” Size, Weight, and Age Range From Froese and Pauly (2017): “Max length : 5.7 cm SL male/unsexed;
    [Show full text]
  • Siluriformes, Loricariidae) from the Tocantins River Basin in Central Brazil, with Comments on the Historical Zoogeography of the New Taxon
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 598: 129–157 (2016) Description of a new catfish genus 129 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.598.7400 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Description of a new catfish genus (Siluriformes, Loricariidae) from the Tocantins River basin in central Brazil, with comments on the historical zoogeography of the new taxon Gabriel S. C. Silva1, Fábio F. Roxo1, Luz E. Ochoa1, Claudio Oliveira1 1 Laboratório de Biologia e Genética de Peixes, Departamento de Morfologia, IBB–UNESP, Campus de Botu- catu, 18618–970, Botucatu, São Paulo state, Brazil Corresponding author: Fábio F. Roxo ([email protected]) Academic editor: N. Bogutskaya | Received 5 December 2015 | Accepted 25 May 2016 | Published 14 June 2016 http://zoobank.org/5331A38A-1FE8-460C-B4C2-49E9D7ECC3FA Citation: Silva GSC, Roxo FF, Luz E. Ochoa LE, Oliveira C (2016) Description of a new catfish genus (Siluriformes, Loricariidae) from the Tocantins River basin in central Brazil, with comments on the historical zoogeography of the new taxon. ZooKeys 598: 129–157. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.598.7400 Abstract This study presents the description of a new genus of the catfish subfamily Neoplecostominae from the Tocantins River basin. It can be distinguished from other neoplecostomine genera by the presence of (1) three hypertrophied bicuspid odontodes on the lateral portion of the body (character apparently present in mature males); (2) a large area without odontodes around the snout; (3) a post-dorsal ridge on the cau- dal peduncle; (4) a straight tooth series in the dentary and premaxillary rows; (5) the absence of abdominal plates; (6) a conspicuous series of enlarged papillae just posterior to the dentary teeth; and (7) caudal pe- duncle ellipsoid in cross section.
    [Show full text]