DOCSLIB.ORG

BEC Dark Matter Can Explain Collisions of Galaxy Clusters

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
BEC Dark Matter Can Explain Collisions of Galaxy Clusters BEC dark matter can explain collisions of galaxy clusters Jae-Weon Lee∗ School of Computational Sciences, Korea Institute for Advanced Study, 207-43 Cheongnyangni 2-dong, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 130-012, Korea Sooil Lim Department of Physics and Astronomy, Seoul National University, Seoul, 151-747, Korea Dale Choi∗ Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information, Kwahanro 335, Yuseong-Gu, Daejeon, 305-806, South Korea (Dated: October 31, 2018) We suggest that the dark matter model based on Bose Einstein condensate or scalar field can resolve the apparently contradictory behaviors of dark matter in the Abell 520 and the Bullet cluster. During a collision of two galaxies in the cluster, if initial kinetic energy of the galaxies is large enough, two dark matter halos pass each other in a soliton-like way as observed in the Bullet cluster. If not, the halos merge due to the tiny repulsive interaction among dark matter particles as observed in the Abell 520. This idea can also explain the origin of the dark galaxy and the galaxy without dark matter. PACS numbers: 98.62.Gq, 95.35.+d, 98.8O.Cq Dark matter (DM) constituting about 24 percent of and lag behind the other matters at the collision center. the mass of the universe is one of the big puzzles in mod- The distribution of DM can be inferred by optical tele- ern physics and cosmology [1, 2] . According to numeri- scopes using the gravitational lensing effect, while that of cal simulations, while the cold dark matter (CDM) with the hot gases by X-ray telescopes like Chandra. The ob- the cosmological constant model (i.e., ΛCDM) is remark- servation of the Bullet cluster [13] using these telescopes ably successful in explaining the formation of the struc- seems to be consistent with this expectation, and to sup- ture larger than galaxies, it seems to encounter prob- port the collisionless CDM theory. On the contrary, in lems on the scale of galaxy or sub-galactic structure. the Abell 520, galaxies (stars) were stripped away from ΛCDM model usually predict the cusped central density the central dense core of the cluster, where gases and and too many sub-halos, and too small angular momen- DM are left. This indicates DM as well as gases is col- tum of the galaxies, which are, arguably, in contradic- lisional, which is puzzling. The collision separating DM tion with observations [3, 4, 5]. On the other hand the from visible matter is also recently observed [16] in the models based on Bose Einstein condensate (BEC) DM or ring-like structure in the galaxy cluster Cl 0024+17 [17]. scalar field dark matter (SFDM) of ultra-light scalar par- It is very hard to explain the contradictive behaviors of ticles well explain the observed rotation curves of galax- DM in these clusters in the context of the standard CDM ies [6, 7] and solve the above problems of CDM models model or even with the modified gravity theories. [8, 9, 10, 11, 12]. In this paper, we suggest that this contradiction can arXiv:0805.3827v1 [hep-ph] 25 May 2008 be also readily resolved in BEC/SFDM model. Further- The mystery deepened further after recent observa- more, our theory can explain the origin of the dark galaxy tions of massive intergalactic collisions in two clusters and the galaxy without dark matter. of galaxy; the bullet cluster (1E0657-56) [13] and the Abell 520 [14]. Galaxy clusters are composed of three First, let us briefly review BEC/SFDM model. In main components behaving differently during collision; 1992, to explain the observed galactic rotation curves, galaxies composed of stars, hot gas between the galax- Sin [18, 19] suggested that galactic halos are astronomical ies, and DM [15]. According to the prevailing theories, objects in BEC of ultra light DM particles such as pseudo DM composed of very weakly interacting particles moves Nambu-Goldstone boson (PNGB) which have Compton −24 only under the influence of gravity and is presumed to be wavelength λcomp = h/mc 10 pc, i.e. m 10 eV . ∼ ≃ collisionless. Since the stars are sparse, they can be also In this model the halos are like gigantic atoms where cold treated as effectively collisionless particles. Thus, when boson DM particles are condensated in a single macro- two clusters of galaxy collide, we expect stars and dark scopic wave function and the quantum mechanical uncer- matter to move together even during a violent collision, tainty principle provides a force against self-gravitational while intergalactic gases self-interact electromagnetically collapse. In the same year one of the author (Lee) and Koh [20, 21] generalized Sin’s BEC model by consid- ering a repulsive self-interaction among DM particles, in the context of field theory and the general relativity. (See ∗Electronic address: [email protected] [22] for a review.) In this model a BEC DM halo is a gi- 2 ant boson star (boson halo [23, 24]) surrounding a visible matter of galaxy and is described by a coherent complex scalar field φ having a typical action µν 4 R g ∗ S = √ gd x[ − φ φ;ν U(φ)] (1) Z − 16πG − 2 ;µ − 2 m 2 λ 4 with a repulsive potential U(φ)= 2 φ + 4 φ . It was | | 1 | | > 2 MP 2 50 found that [21] there are constraints λ ( m ) 10 , −24 < < 3 ∼ and 10 eV m 10 eV , where MP is the Planck mass. We will∼ call∼ two models as BEC/SFDM model [25]. In this model, for λ = 0, the formation of DM struc- tures smaller than the Compton wavelength is suppressed by the uncertainty principle and this property could alle- viate the aforementioned problems of the ΛCDM model. For λ = 0 the minimum scale becomes Λ1/2/m, where 6 2 2 a dimensionless coupling term Λ = λMP /4πm is very large even for very small λ due to the smallness of m relative to MP . Thus, the self-interaction effect is non- negligible, if λ = 0. Despite of their tiny mass, BEC DM particles act as6 CDM particles [26] for the cosmological structure formation, because their velocity dispersion is very small. Thus, BEC/SFDM is an ideal alternative to the standard CDM playing a role of CDM at the scale FIG. 1: (Color online) Schematic diagram representing ax- larger than a galaxy, and at the same time suppressing isymmetric collision of two galaxies. The black curves repre- sub-galactic structures. Later similar ideas were redis- sent the distribution of BEC DM in galactic halos and the red covered by many authors [8, 10, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, dotted lines that of stars of the galaxies. If the initial kinetic 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40]. (See [41] for a review.) energy is high enough, DM and the stars in each galaxy move Now, we investigate in detail the idea that the repulsive together after the collision like solitons. This could be what self-interaction between BEC DM particles separate stars happened to galaxies in the Bullet cluster. from DM during the collision between galaxies or cluster of galaxies. To do this we need equations describing the motion of DM halos. For Λ = 0 these equations are equivalent to the non-linear With a spherical symmetric metric ds2 = B(r)dt2 + Schr¨oedinger equation of Sin’s model [43]. 2 2 − A(r)dr + r dΩ3 the equation of motion for the scalar Since galaxy clusters are composed of about 50 1000 field becomes [42] individual galaxies each surrounded by galactic DM∼ ha- los, we can treat the collision of galaxy clusters as massive ′ ′ 2 ′′ 2 B A ′ Ω σ + [ + ]σ + A[( 1)σ Λσ3]=0, (2) collisions of individual galaxies and expect our analysis x 2B − 2A B − − below on the collision of two galaxies can be applied to 1 the collision of clusters too. Since DM is the major com- ω − 2 −iωt where x = mr, Ω = m and φ(x, t) =(4πG) σ(r)e . ponent of a galaxy, one can assume that the collision Since the collision velocity is non-relativistic (v 10−3c) ∼ dynamics of two galaxies is mainly governed by that of we can use a Newtonian approximation, in which Einstein DM, and baryonic matter (stars and gases) plays a pas- equation for this system reduces to sive role during the collision. 2 Choi and others [44, 45, 46, 47] numerically stud- V =4πGT00, (3) ∇ ied the head-on collision of the boson stars described by where the energy momentum tensor is Eq. (5). It was shown that there are two regimes with very different dynamical properties: solitonic and merg- 1 ∗ ∗ 1 ∗ ing regimes. If two colliding boson stars (galactic DM ha- T = (∂ φ ∂ φ + ∂ φ∂ φ ) g ∂µφ ∂ φ + U(φ) µν 2 µ ν µ ν − µν 2 µ los in our theory) have large enough kinetic energy, then (4) the halos pass each other like solitons during the collision. and V is the Newtonian gravitational potential. The We argue that this is just what happened to galactic DM Newtonian limit of Eq. (2) and the dimensionless form halos in the Bullet cluster. In this case the total energy E of Eq. (3) can be simply written as which is composed of kinetic energy K, the gravitational potential energy W and the repulsion energy I between 4 2V = σ2 + Λσ DM particles (determined by the term λ φ 4) should be 4 . (5) | | ∇2σ =2V σ positive, i.e., E = K + W + I > 0 [45, 46, 47]. In other ∇ 3 of the boson star collision explain the observed contra- dictive behaviors of DM in two clusters.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Arxiv:1903.02002V1 [Astro-Ph.GA] 5 Mar 2019
    Draft version March 7, 2019 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX62 RELICS: Reionization Lensing Cluster Survey Dan Coe,1 Brett Salmon,1 Maruˇsa Bradacˇ,2 Larry D. Bradley,1 Keren Sharon,3 Adi Zitrin,4 Ana Acebron,4 Catherine Cerny,5 Nathalia´ Cibirka,4 Victoria Strait,2 Rachel Paterno-Mahler,3 Guillaume Mahler,3 Roberto J. Avila,1 Sara Ogaz,1 Kuang-Han Huang,2 Debora Pelliccia,2, 6 Daniel P. Stark,7 Ramesh Mainali,7 Pascal A. Oesch,8 Michele Trenti,9, 10 Daniela Carrasco,9 William A. Dawson,11 Steven A. Rodney,12 Louis-Gregory Strolger,1 Adam G. Riess,1 Christine Jones,13 Brenda L. Frye,7 Nicole G. Czakon,14 Keiichi Umetsu,14 Benedetta Vulcani,15 Or Graur,13, 16, 17 Saurabh W. Jha,18 Melissa L. Graham,19 Alberto Molino,20, 21 Mario Nonino,22 Jens Hjorth,23 Jonatan Selsing,24, 25 Lise Christensen,23 Shotaro Kikuchihara,26, 27 Masami Ouchi,26, 28 Masamune Oguri,29, 30, 28 Brian Welch,31 Brian C. Lemaux,2 Felipe Andrade-Santos,13 Austin T. Hoag,2 Traci L. Johnson,32 Avery Peterson,32 Matthew Past,32 Carter Fox,3 Irene Agulli,4 Rachael Livermore,9, 10 Russell E. Ryan,1 Daniel Lam,33 Irene Sendra-Server,34 Sune Toft,24, 25 Lorenzo Lovisari,13 and Yuanyuan Su13 1Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA 2Department of Physics, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA 3Department of Astronomy, University of Michigan, 1085 South University Ave, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA 4Physics Department, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Radio Observations of the Merging Galaxy Cluster Abell 520 D
    A&A 622, A20 (2019) Astronomy https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833900 & c ESO 2019 Astrophysics LOFAR Surveys: a new window on the Universe Special issue Radio observations of the merging galaxy cluster Abell 520 D. N. Hoang1, T. W. Shimwell2,1, R. J. van Weeren1, G. Brunetti3, H. J. A. Röttgering1, F. Andrade-Santos4, A. Botteon3,5, M. Brüggen6, R. Cassano3, A. Drabent7, F. de Gasperin6, M. Hoeft7, H. T. Intema1, D. A. Rafferty6, A. Shweta8, and A. Stroe9 1 Leiden Observatory, Leiden University, PO Box 9513, NL-2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands e-mail: [email protected] 2 Netherlands Institute for Radio Astronomy (ASTRON), PO Box 2, 7990 AA Dwingeloo, The Netherlands 3 INAF-Istituto di Radioastronomia, via P. Gobetti 101, 40129 Bologna, Italy 4 Harvard-Smithsonian for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA 5 Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Università di Bologna, via P. Gobetti 93/2, 40129 Bologna, Italy 6 Hamburger Sternwarte, University of Hamburg, Gojenbergsweg 112, 21029 Hamburg, Germany 7 Thüringer Landessternwarte, Sternwarte 5, 07778 Tautenburg, Germany 8 Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER), Pune, India 9 European Southern Observatory, Karl-Schwarzschild-Str. 2, 85748 Garching, Germany Received 18 July 2018 / Accepted 10 September 2018 ABSTRACT Context. Extended synchrotron radio sources are often observed in merging galaxy clusters. Studies of the extended emission help us to understand the mechanisms in which the radio emitting particles gain their relativistic energies. Aims. We examine the possible acceleration mechanisms of the relativistic particles that are responsible for the extended radio emis- sion in the merging galaxy cluster Abell 520.
    [Show full text]
  • Axion-Higgs 3-Dimensional Rigid Transformable Strings and the Compound 650 Gev Z-Z Decay Into Quarks/Leptoquarks
    The Magic of Life- and Matter Creating Self Propelled Electric Dark Matter Black Holes Guided by a Holographic Entangled Symmetric Multiverse System. Leo Vuyk, Architect, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Abstract, In Quantum Function Follows Form Theory, ( Q-FFF Theory) the Big Bang was the evaporation and splitting of a former Big Crunch black hole nucleus of compressed massless Axion Higgs particles. The Big Bang Nucleus of compressed massless Axion /Higgs particles is assumed to be split into respectively chunky nuclei of dark matter black holes called plasma /matter creating Quasars, or evaporated as singular massless Axion Higgs vacuum particles oscillating along a tetrahedral shaped chiral vacuum lattice. The vacuum Lattice is supposed to represent a dynamic reference frame with variable local length and so called Dark Energy or Zero Point Energy acting as the motor for all Fermion spin and eigen energy and as the transfer medium for all photon information, leading to local lightspeed and local time. The energetic oscillating vacuum lattice is assumed to act as a Gravity Quantum Dipole Repeller (or large scale Casimir effect) Gravitons are not supposed to attract- but repel Fermions with less impulse than vacuum particle pressure does. So, gravity is assumed to be a dual pressure process on fermions. As a consequence, Feynman diagrams become more complex than before.. Recent measurements by Yehuda Hoffman et al. did show the repelling effect of “empty space” in opposition of the “attracting gravity effect” of super clusters which he called “Dipole Repeller” effect. The universe is supposed to be Holographic by the instant long distance entanglement particle guidance between Charge Parity Symmetric Universes; the Multiverse.
    [Show full text]
  • Cycle 16 Approved Programs
    Cycle 16 Approved Programs First Name Last Name Type Phase II ID Institution Country Science Category Title Brigham Young Searching For Unresolved Binary Brown Jacob Albretsen AR 11238 USA Cool Stars University Dwarfs Using Point Spread Functions Fermi National A Unique High Resolution Window to Two Sahar Allam GO 11167 Accelerator USA Cosmology Strongly Lensed Lyman Break Galaxies Laboratory (FNAL) New Sightlines for the Study of Intergalactic University of Quasar Absorption Scott Anderson GO 11215 USA Helium: Dozens of High-Confidence, UV- Washington Lines and IGM Bright Quasars from SDSS/GALEX Rutgers the State Unresolved Stellar NICMOS imaging of submillimeter galaxies Andrew Baker GO 11143 University of New USA Populations with CO and PAH redshifts Jersey University of ISM and Bruce Balick GO 11122 USA Expanding PNe: Distances and Hydro Models Washington Circumstellar Matter Identifying Atomic and Molecular Absorption Travis Barman AR 11239 Lowell Observatory USA Cool Stars in an Extrasolar Planet Atmosphere University of Texas at George Benedict GO 11210 USA Cool Stars The Architecture of Exoplanetary Systems Austin University of Texas at Resolved Stellar An Astrometric Calibration of Population II George Benedict GO 11211 USA Austin Populations Distance Indicators Space Telescope Monitoring the Giant Flare of HST-1 in the John Biretta GO 11216 USA AGN/Quasars Science Institute M87 Jet Roger Blandford AR 11288 Stanford University USA Cosmology PASS: Paying Attention to the Small Structure Space Telescope ISM and Howard Bond GO 11217
    [Show full text]
  • University of Virginia Department of Astronomy Leander Mccormick Observatory Charlottesville, Virginia, 22903-0818 ͓S0002-7537͑95͒02201-3͔
    1 University of Virginia Department of Astronomy Leander McCormick Observatory Charlottesville, Virginia, 22903-0818 ͓S0002-7537͑95͒02201-3͔ This report covers the period 1 September 2003 to 31 Theory, Long Term Space Astrophysics, Origins of Solar August 2004. Systems, and XMM programs, JPL, Chandra, Space Tele- scope Science Institute, and the NSF Stars/Stellar Systems 1. PERSONNEL and Gravitational Physics Programs. During this time the departmental teaching faculty con- sisted of Steven A. Balbus, Roger A. Chevalier, John F. 2. FACILITIES Hawley, Zhi-Yun Li, Steven R. Majewski, Edward M. The Leander McCormick Observatory with its 26-in Murphy, Robert W. O’Connell, Robert T. Rood, Craig L. Clark refractor on Mount Jefferson is now used exclusively Sarazin, William C. Saslaw, Michael F. Skrutskie, Trinh X. for education and public outreach. It is heavily used for both Thuan, Charles R. Tolbert, and D. Mark Whittle. our graduate and undergraduate courses. The Public Night Research scientists associated with the department were program has been expanded. During the year a plan to Gregory J. Black, Richard J. Patterson, P. Kenneth Seidel- greatly expand the education and public outreach program mann, Anne J. Verbiscer, John C. Wilson, and Kiriaki M. was initiated. This is described in § 4. Xilouris. The 0.7-m and the 1-m reflectors on Fan Mountain were Robert E. Johnson from Materials Science has his re- used during the year for our undergraduate majors and search group in planetary astronomy located within the de- graduate observational astronomy courses. A major upgrade partment. In retirement both Laurence W. Fredrick and of instrumentation is underway and is described in § 3.7.
    [Show full text]
  • Probing Quantum Gravity Through Strong Gravitational Lensing
    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 14 February 2018 doi:10.20944/preprints201712.0093.v2 Probing Quantum Gravity through Strong Gravitational Lensing S Marongwe1, Department of Physics and Astronomy Botswana International University of Science and Technology, P. Bag 16, Palapye, Botswana E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. We report the use of Einstein rings to reveal the quantized and dynamical states of space-time in a region of impressed gravitational field as predicted by the Nexus Paradigm of quantum gravity. This in turn reveals the orbital speeds of objects found therein and the radius of curvature of the quantized space-time. Similarities between the Nexus graviton and the singular isothermal sphere (SIS) in the Cold Dark Matter (CDM) paradigm are highlighted. However unlike the singular isothermal sphere, the Nexus graviton does not contain singularities or divergent integrals. This solves the core cusp problem. In this work, data from a sample of fifteen Einstein rings published on the Cfa-Arizona Space Telescope Lens Survey (CASTLES) website is used to probe the quantized properties of space-time. Keywords: (Quantum Gravity; Gravitational Lensing; Dark Matter; Quantum Vacuum; Graviton) Introduction In 1937, Zwicky (Zwicky 1937 ) provided the first reproducible evidence of the presence of unseen matter in the Coma Cluster group of galaxies by applying the classic virial theorem where he also suggested that the gravitational field of galaxy clusters is expected to deflect the light observed from background galaxies. Today, numerous observations (Boller 1989, 1 To whom any correspondence should be addressed. 1 © 2018 by the author(s). Distributed under a Creative Commons CC BY license.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1405.0222V2 [Astro-Ph.CO] 22 Oct 2014
    Accepted to ApJ: draft date October 23, 2014 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 5/2/11 LENS MODELS AND MAGNIFICATION MAPS OF THE SIX HUBBLE FRONTIER FIELDS CLUSTERS∗ Traci L. Johnson1, Keren Sharon1, Matthew B. Bayliss2,3, Michael D. Gladders4,5, Dan Coe6, Harald Ebeling7 Accepted to ApJ: draft date October 23, 2014 ABSTRACT We present strong-lensing models, as well as mass and magnification maps, for the cores of the six HST Frontier Fields galaxy clusters. Our parametric lens models are constrained by the locations and redshifts of multiple image systems of lensed background galaxies. We use a combination of photometric redshifts and spectroscopic redshifts of the lensed background sources obtained by us (for Abell 2744 and Abell S1063), collected from the literature, or kindly provided by the lensing community. Using our results, we (1) compare the derived mass distribution of each cluster to its light distribution, (2) quantify the cumulative magnification power of the HFF clusters, (3) describe how our models can be used to estimate the magnification and image multiplicity of lensed background sources at all redshifts and at any position within the cluster cores, and (4) discuss systematic effects and caveats resulting from our modeling methods. We specifically investigate the effect of the use of spectroscopic and photometric redshift constraints on the uncertainties of the resulting models. We find that the photometric redshift estimates of lensed galaxies are generally in excellent agreement with spectroscopic redshifts, where available. However, the flexibility associated with relaxed redshift priors may cause the complexity of large-scale structure that is needed to account for the lensing signal to be underestimated.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dynamics of Merging Clusters: a Monte Carlo Solution Applied to the Bullet and Musket Ball Clusters
    Introduction The method Applications Summary The Dynamics of Merging Clusters: A Monte Carlo Solution Applied to the Bullet and Musket Ball Clusters William A. Dawson University of California, Davis, Physics Department 5 de setembro de 2013 Seminário do grupo de Extragaláctica Departamento de Astronomia - IAG/USP William A. Dawson The Dynamics of Merging Clusters: A Monte Carlo Solution Applied to the Bullet Introduction The method Applications Summary Outline 1 Introduction Why the study of merging cluster are important? Dissociative mergers Merging configuration Problems Methods to study the merger dynamics A new method 2 The method Model Monte Carlo Analysis 3 Applications Bullet Cluster dynamics Musket Ball dynamics 4 Summary William A. Dawson The Dynamics of Merging Clusters: A Monte Carlo Solution Applied to the Bullet Why the study of merging cluster are important? Introduction Dissociative mergers The method Merging configuration Applications Problems Summary Methods to study the merger dynamics A new method Why the study of merging cluster are important? Merging clusters are important probes to σDM (e.g. Bullet Cluster) and the large-scale matter-antimatter ratio (e.g. Steigman 08); The best constraints come from M/L of the sub-clusters and the offset between the collisionless galaxies and DM; both depends on the merger dynamics (basically the velocity of collision (1) and the time since collision (2)); (1) will affect the the expected momentum transfer between each sub-clusterâs dark matter particles → affect the expected dark matter mass transfer from the smaller to the largest sub-cluster → affect the expected M/L; (2) the galaxy-DM offset depends on the time-since-collision (TSC); initially the offset will increase with TSC (for σDM > 0) as the galaxies outrun the DM → at later TSC the offset will decrease due to the gravitational attraction (galaxies + DM).
    [Show full text]
  • Mirror Dark Matter Discovered?
    Mirror dark matter discovered? Z.K. Silagadze Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics and Novosibirsk State University 630 090, Novosibirsk, Russia Recent astrophysical data indicates that dark matter shows a contro- versial behaviour in galaxy cluster collisions. In case of the notorious Bullet cluster, dark matter component of the cluster behaves like a collisionless system. However, its behaviour in the Abell 520 cluster indicates a sig- nificant self-interaction cross-section. It is hard for the WIMP based dark matter models to reconcile such a diverse behaviour. Mirror dark matter models, on the contrary, are more flexible and for them diverse behaviour of the dark matter is a natural expectation. PACS numbers: 95.30.-k, 95.35.+d, 11.30.Er 1. Introduction The evidence of dark matter is compelling at all observed astrophysical scales [1, 2]. At that the dark matter reveals itself only through its grav- arXiv:0808.2595v2 [astro-ph] 20 Aug 2008 itational interactions. There are no observational facts that indicate exis- tence of any significant interactions between the ordinary and dark matter particles. However, some recent astrophysical observations show that dark matter particles may have significant self-interactions. This is surprising be- cause other observations support the WIMP paradigm that the dark matter is essentially collisionless. The mirror dark matter [3, 4, 5], first introduced in [6], has a potential to reconcile these seemingly contradictory observa- tional facts. For other attempts to do this, on the base of BEC dark matter, see [7]. Below, after briefly commenting the mirror matter idea, we consider the above mentioned observational facts and argue why, in our opinion, they indicate the existence of the mirror matter as the main dark matter component.
    [Show full text]
  • Feedback in Galaxy Clusters and Brightest Cluster Galaxy Star
    Feedback in Galaxy Clusters and Brightest Cluster Galaxy Star Formation by Kevin Fogarty A dissertation submitted to The Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Baltimore, Maryland August, 2017 c Kevin Fogarty 2017 All rights reserved Abstract My main thesis work is to understand the relationship between star forma- tion in the brightest cluster galaxy (BCG) and the thermodynamical state of the intracluster medium (ICM) of cool core galaxy clusters. Detailed photometry of BCGs in galaxy clusters observed in the Cluster Lensing and Supernova survey with Hubble (CLASH) reveal ultraviolet and Hα emitting knot and filamentary structures extending several tens of kpc. I initially focus on these structures, −1 which harbor starbursts forming stars at rates between < 1 M yr and ∼ −1 250 M yr . I perform ultraviolet through far-infrared Spectral Energy Dis- tribution (SED) fitting on combined Hubble, Spitzer, and Herschel photometry of CLASH BCGs, and measure star formation rates (SFRs), dust contents, and constrain the duration of starburst activity. Using X-ray data from Chandra, I find a tight relationship between CLASH BCG SFRs and the cooling-to-freefall time ratio in the ICM. I propose treating the cooling-to-freefall time ratio as a proxy for the mass condensation efficiency of the ICM in the core of cool-core clusters, an interpretation which is motivated by recent theoretical work de- ii ABSTRACT scribing feedback regulated condensation and precipitation of the ICM in cool core clusters. I follow up this work by performing similar SED fitting on a larger sample of clusters observed in the Cosmic Evolution Survey (COSMOS).
    [Show full text]
  • Colliding Clusters and Dark Matter Self-Interactions
    Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 000, 000{000 (0000) Printed 20 January 2014 (MN LATEX style file v2.2) Colliding clusters and dark matter self-interactions Felix Kahlhoefer,1? Kai Schmidt-Hoberg,2 Mads T. Frandsen3 and Subir Sarkar1;4 1 Rudolf Peierls Centre for Theoretical Physics, University of Oxford, 1 Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3NP, United Kingdom 2 Theory Division, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland 3 CP3-Origins and the Danish Institute for Advanced Study, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, Denmark 4 Niels Bohr Institute, Blegdamsvej 17, 2100 København Ø, Denmark 20 January 2014 ABSTRACT When a dark matter halo moves through a background of dark matter particles, self- interactions can lead to both deceleration and evaporation of the halo and thus shift its centroid relative to the collisionless stars and galaxies. We study the magnitude and time evolution of this shift for two classes of dark matter self-interactions, viz. frequent self-interactions with small momentum transfer (e.g. due to long-range interactions) and rare self-interactions with large momentum transfer (e.g. contact interactions), and find important differences between the two cases. We find that neither effect can be strong enough to completely separate the dark matter halo from the galaxies, if we impose conservative bounds on the self-interaction cross-section. The majority of both populations remain bound to the same gravitational potential and the peaks of their distributions are therefore always coincident. Consequently any apparent separation is mainly due to particles which are leaving the gravitational potential, so will be largest shortly after the collision but not observable in evolved systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Dark Matter Mystery Deepens in Cosmic 'Train Wreck' 16 August 2007
    Dark matter mystery deepens in cosmic 'train wreck' 16 August 2007 of galaxies, which may pose problems for current theories of dark matter behavior. "These results challenge our understanding of the way clusters merge," said Dr. Andisheh Mahdavi of the University of Victoria, British Columbia. "Or, they possibly make us even reexamine the nature of dark matter itself." There are three main components to galaxy clusters: individual galaxies composed of billions of stars, hot gas in between the galaxies, and dark matter, a mysterious substance that dominates the cluster mass and can be detected only through its gravitational effects. Optical telescopes can observe the starlight from the individual galaxies, and can infer the location of dark matter by its subtle light-bending effects on distant galaxies. X-ray telescopes like Chandra An artist's illustration of the Abell 520 system shows detect the multimillion-degree gas. where the bulk of the matter (blue) is found compared to the individual galaxies (yellow) and the hot gas (red) in the aftermath of a massive galaxy cluster collision. The A popular theory of dark matter predicts that dark material shown in blue is dominated by dark matter. As matter and galaxies should stay together, even with the Bullet Cluster there are large separation during a violent collision, as observed in the case of between the regions where the galaxies are most the so-called Bullet Cluster. However, when the common (peaks 2 and 4) and where most of the hot gas Chandra data of the galaxy cluster system known lies (peak 3). However, unlike the Bullet Cluster, a as Abell 520 was mapped along with the optical concentration of dark matter is found (peak 3) near the data from the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope bulk of the hot gas, where very few galaxies are located.
    [Show full text]