DOCSLIB.ORG

Bennett Valley Viticultural Area OHA Will Summarily Dismiss an (2002R–009T) Untimely NAICS Code Appeal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bennett Valley Viticultural Area OHA Will Summarily Dismiss an (2002R–009T) Untimely NAICS Code Appeal 70352 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 226 / Friday, November 22, 2002 / Proposed Rules a petition for review are contract send to OHA a copy of the solicitation 34. Amend § 134.316(a) by adding the specific, such as compliance with the relating to the NAICS code appeal. following sentence at the end to read as nonmanufacturer rule (see § 121.406(b)), (5) After close of the record, OHA will follows: or joint venture or ostensible issue a decision and inform all subcontractor rule (see § 121.103(h)). interested parties, including the § 134.316 The decision. 29. Revise § 121.1103 to read as appellant and contracting officer. If (a) * * * The Judge will not decide follows: OHA’s decision is received by the substantive issues raised for the first contracting officer before the date offers time on appeal, or which have been § 121.1103 What are the procedures for are due, the solicitation must be abandoned or become moot. appealing a NAICS code designation? amended if the contracting officer’s * * * * * (a) Any interested party adversely designation of the NAICS code is Dated: November 8, 2002. affected by a NAICS code designation reversed. If OHA’s decision is received Hector V. Barreto, may appeal the designation to OHA. by the contracting officer after the due The only exception is that, for a sole date of initial offers, the decision will Administrator. source contract reserved under SBA’s not apply to the pending procurement, [FR Doc. 02–29272 Filed 11–21–02; 8:45 am] 8(a) Business Development program (see but will apply to future solicitations for BILLING CODE 8025–01–P part 124 of this chapter), only SBA’s the same products or services. Associate Administrator for 8(a) 30. Revise § 121.1205 to read as Business Development may appeal the follows: DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY NAICS code designation. (b) The contracting officer’s § 121.1205 How is a list of previously Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and granted class waivers obtained? determination of the applicable NAICS Firearms code is final unless appealed as follows: A list of classes of products for which (1) An appeal from a contracting waivers of the Nonmanufacturer Rule 27 CFR Part 9 officer’s NAICS code designation and have been granted is maintained in [Notice No. 963] applicable size standard must be served SBA’s website at www.sba.gov/GC/ RIN 1512–AC72 and filed within 10 calendar days after approved.html. A list of such waivers the issuance of the initial solicitation. may also be obtained by contacting the Office of Government Contracting, U.S. Bennett Valley Viticultural Area OHA will summarily dismiss an (2002R–009T) untimely NAICS code appeal. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd (2)(i) The appeal petition must be in Street, SW., Washington, DC 20416, or AGENCY: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco writing and must be sent to the Office the nearest SBA Government and Firearms (ATF), Treasury. Contracting Area Office. of Hearings & Appeals, U.S. Small ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, PART 134—RULES OF PROCEDURE SW., Suite 5900, Washington, DC 20416. SUMMARY: The Bureau of Alcohol, GOVERNING CASES BEFORE THE Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) has (ii) There is no required format for a OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS NAICS code appeal, but an appeal must received a petition proposing the include the following information: the 31. The authority citation for 13 CFR establishment of the Bennett Valley solicitation or contract number; the part 134 continues to read as follows: viticultural area in Sonoma County, California. The petitioned area consists name, address, and telephone number of Authority: 5 U.S.C. 504; 15 U.S.C. 632, the contracting officer; a full and 634(b)(6), and 637(a). of approximately 8,140 acres of valley specific statement as to why the NAICS and upland terrain, with 650 acres 32. Revise § 134.102(k) to read as code designation is erroneous, and currently planted to grapes. The follows: argument in support thereof; and the proposed area is within the established name, address and telephone number of § 134.102 Jurisdiction of OHA. Sonoma Valley viticultural area, except the appellant or its attorney. for a 281-acre overlap into the Sonoma * * * * * Coast viticultural area. A portion of the (3) The appellant must serve the (k) Appeals from size determinations proposed area also overlaps the Sonoma appeal petition upon the contracting and NAICS code designations under Mountain viticultural area, which is officer who assigned the NAICS code to part 121 of this chapter. ‘‘Size itself totally within the larger Sonoma the acquisition and SBA’s Office of determinations’’ include decisions by Valley viticultural area. General Counsel, Associate General Government Contracting Area Directors Counsel for Procurement Law, 409 3rd that determine whether two or more DATES: Written comments must be Street, SW., Washington, DC 20416. concerns are affiliated for purposes of received by January 21, 2003. (4) Upon receipt of a NAICS code SBA’s financial assistance programs, or ADDRESSES: Send written comments to: appeal, OHA will notify the contracting other programs for which an appropriate Chief, Regulations Division, Bureau of officer by notice and order of the date SBA official requested an affiliation Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, P.O. OHA received the appeal, the docket determination; Box 50221, Washington, DC 20091–0221 number, and the Judge assigned to the * * * * * (Attn: Notice No. 963). Copies of the case. The contracting officer’s response 33. In § 134.314, revise the heading petition, the proposed regulations, the to the appeal must include argument and add the following sentence at the appropriate maps, and any written and supporting evidence (see part 134, end to read as follows: comments received will be available for subpart C, of this chapter) and must be public inspection by appointment at the received by OHA within 10 calendar § 134.314 Standard of review and burden ATF Reference Library, Room 6480, 650 days from the date of the docketing of proof. Massachusetts Avenue, NW., notice and order, unless otherwise * * * The appellant has the burden Washington, DC 20226; telephone 202– specified by the Judge. Upon receipt of of proof, by a preponderance of the 927–7890. See the ‘‘Public OHA’s docketing notice and order, the evidence, in both size and NAICS code Participation’’ section of this notice for contracting officer must immediately appeals. alternative means of commenting. VerDate 0ct<31>2002 15:14 Nov 21, 2002 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\22NOP1.SGM 22NOP1 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 226 / Friday, November 22, 2002 / Proposed Rules 70353 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: N. similar to the name of the viticultural map. The petition also includes an A. Sutton, Specialist, Regulations area must review their existing products excerpt from the 1877 ‘‘Historical Atlas Division (San Francisco, CA), Bureau of to insure that they are eligible to use the Map of Sonoma County,’’ which states Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, 221 viticultural area’s name as the that if Bennett Valley ‘‘has any Main Street, 11th Floor, San Francisco, appellation of origin. To be eligible, specialty, it is for fruit and grape CA 94105–1906; telephone 415–271– 85% of the grapes in the wine must be culture.’’ 1254. grown within the viticultural area. If a The petition also offers SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: product is not eligible to use the documentation for the current usage of viticultural area name as an appellation, the proposed area’s name. This includes Background the bottler must obtain approval of a references from a book by Don Edwards, The Federal Alcohol Administration label with a different brand name for ‘‘Making the Most of Sonoma County, A Act (FAA Act) at 27 U.S.C. 205(e) that wine. (See 27 CFR 4.39(i).) California Guide,’’ which states, requires that alcohol beverage labels Bennett Valley Petition ‘‘Bennett Valley—squeezed between provide the consumer with adequate Taylor Mountain and the Sonoma information regarding a product’s ATF has received a petition proposing Mountains on the west, Bennett Peak identity while prohibiting the use of a new viticultural area to be called (Yulupa to the Indians) and Bennett deceptive information on such labels. ‘‘Bennett Valley.’’ The proposed 8,140- Ridge to the east—has been ranching The FAA Act also authorizes the Bureau acre viticultural area is located in and farming country since the days of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) Sonoma County, California, just when Missourian William Bennett southeast of the city of Santa Rosa and to issue regulations to carry out the settled here.’’ The Bennett Valley approximately 45 miles northeast of San Act’s provisions. Homeowner’s Association’s web site Francisco. Sonoma County is entirely Regulations in 27 CFR part 4, Labeling includes a boundary description similar within the North Coast viticultural area. and Advertising of Wine, allow the to that of the proposed viticultural area. The petitioned area is almost entirely establishment of definitive viticultural The Sonoma County telephone book has within the Sonoma Valley viticultural areas. The regulations allow the name of 24 business listings using the Bennett area, with a small 281-acre overlap into an approved viticultural area to be used Valley name, including the Bennett the Sonoma Coast viticultural area. It as an appellation of origin on wine Valley Union School District. The also partially overlaps the Sonoma labels and in wine advertisements. A Bennett Valley School is identified on list of approved viticultural areas is Mountain viticultural area, which is entirely within the Sonoma Valley area. the USGS Santa Rosa, CA, quadrangle contained in 27 CFR Part 9, American map just inside the proposed area’s Viticultural Areas.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • In 2003, When I Returned from the Northern Rhône to Sonoma County
    crafted in sebastopol,ca shane wine cellars p.o. box 533 novato, ca 94948 t 415.342.7926 f 415.883.9411 issue four, august 9, 2010 Sonoma County is renowned for its diverse The Judge and Jemrose vineyards present micro-climates and Bennett Valley has emerged bountiful opportunities. I am grateful to work In 2003, when I returned as a new frontier in Sonoma County’s landscape. with these fantastic sites run by two impressive from the Northern Rhône Its cool winds, dense fog, and varied expositions families. Joe and Gail Judge and Gloria and make Bennett Valley ideal for advocates of cool- Jim Mack are among the vanguard of Bennett to Sonoma County, I climate syrah. Essentially, Bennett Valley is a Valley growers, and both families are artfully tunnel for wind and fog; the surrounding peaks guided by cutting-edge vineyard manager Chris was determined to find of Taylor Mountain, Sonoma Mountain, and Bowland. Wines from their vineyards exhibit Bennett Mountain create Bennett Valley’s cool- all that California syrah can achieve. Syrahs vineyards that would climate vortex. This geographic composition, from Bennett Valley blend fruit and spice allow me to express the and its placement at the head of the Petaluma together like no other appellation in the state. Wind Gap, meld together to create Bennett nuance and beauty of the Valley’s enviable balance of sun drenched days and cool evenings. Northern Rhône syrah I However, a great site alone does not create had become accustomed great wine. Farming is the key to harnessing to drinking.
    [Show full text]
  • Sonoma Mountain Journal 2017
    Volume 17, no. 1 December, 2017 This year’s Journal highlights the DEVASTATION, REFUGE & HEALING ON THE MOUNTAIN stories and effects of the 2017 Arthur Dawson wildfires on Sonoma Mountain On the night of October 8th, a fire started residents who checked the fire’s advance Inside in the Mayacamas, just three miles (see Steve Lee’s account on page 5). northeast of downtown Glen Ellen and Letter from the Chair Like those firefighters, the mountain the base of Sonoma Mountain. Pushed itself played a protective role. It shielded Lafferty Ranch Update by ferocious winds, the blaze swept Petaluma from blunt force of the winds southwest, consuming homes on Nuns Tributes: Pat Eliot & John Barinaga which drove the fire in its early days. It also Canyon, Dunbar, Henno and Warm Springs served as a refuge for animals escaping A First-Hand Account Roads. My own home was among those the conflagration. Nancy Kirwan, who lost. When the firestorm reached O’Donnell lives near Carriger Creek, reports that The Evils in the Hills Lane, next to Sonoma Creek, the winds the coyote population has gone up in her Crane Creek Regional Park were strong enough to move several cars. neighborhood—their howling serenades, No one witnessed it, but such a feat would which used to happen occasionally, are have required tornado-force winds. now a nightly occurrence. The first peoples of southern After crossing the creek, the fire raced up Likewise, another resident noticed a Sonoma county, the Coast the lower slopes of the mountain, igniting marked increase in owl calls in her area.
    [Show full text]
  • Golf Update Oakmont Emergency Drill—March 14 Too Many Chips! Ova To
    Oakmont’s Semimonthly Newspaper www.oakmontvillage.com/news March 1, 2020 • Volume 59, Number 5 OVA To Seek Legal Advice on Future of Homeless Site T oo Many Chips! nAl Haggerty nStaff Report Reacting to skepticism regarding the future of the In remarks at the OVA Board meeting, Gorin noted Los Guilicos homeless site across Highway 12 from that the county is focusing on permanent supportive Oakmont, the OVA Board of Directors adopted an housing in buildings such as motels, adding that LG Oakmont task force report at its Feb. 18 meeting Village does not meet permanent supportive housing recommending that it hire an attorney with experience requirements. She said the cost of rehabilitating the in land use and the requirements of California law. older buildings near the village would be “enormous” The report said even if the site is shut down after and any suggestion along these lines is “long in the 90 or 180 days, “waiting to find out if that is true is future.” not recommended.” “While director Jack Tibbetts is Director Carolyn Bettencourt called the LG Village likely to continue doing a great job with security and “a prescription for disaster,” adding: “We need to transportation,” it continues, “Jack is not in control hold our elected officials accountable to their original of the ultimate decision as promise that the LG site is to whether the site is shut closed by April 30.” down or continues in some Director Jess Marzak said Piles of wood chips line the Community Garden fence on Feb. 17. (Photo by Marty Thompson) form.” Tibbetts is executive he is a real supporter of hiring director of St.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of Sonoma County Guidebook.Pdf
    I l ASSOCIATION OF ENGINEERING GEOLOGISTS \ San Francisco Section 1 I 1 AEG San Francisco Section Field Trip Geology and Tectonics of the San Francisco North Bay Area Saturday June 14, 2008 Leaders: James Allen, CSU East Bay, Earth and Environmental Sciences Peter Holland, Vector Engineering James Wilen Jr., BACE Geotechnical Guidebook by: James Allen Peter Holland James Wilen Jr. l l TABLE OF CONTENTS (Page numbers exclude figure pages) Directions & Road Log. .. I Overview of Stops... ........................ .. ........................... .......................................... I Introduction. .............................................. ................................................ ...... ..... 2 Regional Geology. 3 Franciscan Complex ................................................................................... 3 Great Valley Group.. ...................... .................... ........................................ 3 Salinian Block at Pt. Reyes ........................................................................... 4 Tertiary Rocks East of the San Andreas Fault. ..................................................... 4 Monterey Group ....................................................................................... 4 San Pablo Group ........ ........................................................ ........................ 4 Orinda Formation..................................................................................... 4 Moraga Formation ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix E: Regional Geophysical Data
    APPENDIX E: REGIONAL GEOPHYSICAL DATA GEOPHYSICAL REGIONS We used the USGS uaternary deposits data, together with current topo- graphic data from the National Elevation Dataset ⅓-arc second Digital Elevation Model, and rainfall isohyets from the Sonoma County Water Agency, to divide the Laguna into geophysical regions. A study of surficial geology, precipitation, and topography revealed eighteen distinct geophysical regions. Defining these has proven to be especially useful in explaining why we see patterns of vegetation and the consequent patterns of human development throughout the watershed. Plate shows the eighteen geophysical regions of the Laguna. Their boundaries are well defined through the natural expression of rainfall pat- terns, surficial geology, elevation, soil, and vegetation. The immediate imprint of the rainfall pattern on the land is to create a natural landscape of softwood and hardwood forests, grasslands and chap- arral. Together with other natural ingredients, such as geological deposits, topographical features and soil characteristics, distinct vegetation zones become recognizable. BENNETT VALLEY This region is situated in the eastern half of the watershed and is wholly encompassed by the Matanzas region. Matanzas Creek itself forms the region’s western backbone. The region is called out for its distinct topog- raphy, which is gently tipped towards the west. The region enveloping Bennett Valley from the south, east and west, is characterized by steeper hills with drainage towards this bowl-shaped valley. From southeast to northwest, the region’s major axis is about three miles long. The valley is 472 Enhancing and Caring for the Laguna almost one and a half miles wide at its southern end and tapers down to about three-fourths of a mile in width at its northern end.
    [Show full text]
  • Trione-Annadel
    Our Mission The mission of California State Parks is tart in a cool, shaded to provide for the health, inspiration and S Trione-Annadel education of the people of California by helping to preserve the state’s extraordinary biological forest—move through State Park diversity, protecting its most valued natural and cultural resources, and creating opportunities mixed oak to expansive for high-quality outdoor recreation. open meadows and around a refreshing 26-acre lake through tangled chaparral— then return to the deep California State Parks supports equal access. Prior to arrival, visitors with disabilities who forest coolness. need assistance should contact the park at (707) 539-3911. If you need this publication in an alternate format, contact [email protected]. CALIFORNIA STATE PARKS P.O. Box 942896 Sacramento, CA 94296-0001 For information call: (800) 777-0369 (916) 653-6995, outside the U.S. 711, TTY relay service www.parks.ca.gov Trione-Annadel State Park 6201 Channel Drive Santa Rosa, CA 95409 (707) 539-3911 © 2003 California State Parks (Rev. 2018) T rione-Annadel State Park sits in Pomo went to nearby Mission San as well as in their reconstruction after the the historic Valley of the Moon, an area Francisco Solano, were forced into 1906 earthquake. However, cobblestone popularized by author Jack London. This involuntary servitude, or were moved roads were not suitable for motor peaceful, unspoiled park is 60 miles north of onto reservations. vehicles, and by the 1920s, demand for San Francisco on the eastern edge of Santa Although the Pomo resisted these them had significantly declined.
    [Show full text]
  • Trione-Annadel State Park 6201 Channel Drive Santa Rosa, CA 95409 (707) 539-3911
    Our Mission The mission of California State Parks is tart in a cool, shaded to provide for the health, inspiration and S Trione-Annadel education of the people of California by helping to preserve the state’s extraordinary biological forest—move through State Park diversity, protecting its most valued natural and cultural resources, and creating opportunities mixed oak to expansive for high-quality outdoor recreation. open meadows and around a refreshing 26-acre lake through tangled chaparral— then return to the deep California State Parks supports equal access. Prior to arrival, visitors with disabilities who forest coolness. need assistance should contact the park at (707) 539-3911. If you need this publication in an alternate format, contact [email protected]. CALIFORNIA STATE PARKS P.O. Box 942896 Sacramento, CA 94296-0001 For information call: (800) 777-0369 (916) 653-6995, outside the U.S. 711, TTY relay service www.parks.ca.gov Trione-Annadel State Park 6201 Channel Drive Santa Rosa, CA 95409 (707) 539-3911 © 2003 California State Parks (Rev. 2018) T rione-Annadel State Park sits in Pomo went to nearby Mission San as well as in their reconstruction after the the historic Valley of the Moon, an area Francisco Solano, were forced into 1906 earthquake. However, cobblestone popularized by author Jack London. This involuntary servitude, or were moved roads were not suitable for motor peaceful, unspoiled park is 60 miles north of onto reservations. vehicles, and by the 1920s, demand for San Francisco on the eastern edge of Santa Although the Pomo resisted these them had significantly declined.
    [Show full text]
  • Bennett Valley Area Plan Rev 2011 (Open Space Map Correction 1-7-14)
    BENNETT VALLEY AREA PLAN Adopted by Resolution No. 63206A February 27, 1979 Modified by Resolution No. 93-0337 March 9, 1993 Modified by Resolution No. 08-0808 September 23, 2008 Modified by Resolution No. 11-0461 September 30, 2011 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS BENNETT VALLEY SPECIFIC PLAN DUANE BUTLER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING PRANAB CHAKRAWARTI, FORMER DIRECTOR OF PLANNING TOBY ROSS, Chief, Comprehensive Planning Section CAROL WHITMIRE, Project Planner RAY KRAUSS, Project Planner IRENE LESLIE & TERRIE CHRYSLER, Production GARY MANN, JORILYNN WALKER & NANCY STROVER, Graphics REVISED BENNETT VALLEY AREA PLAN KENNETH MILAM, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING GREG CARR, Chief, Comprehensive Planning Division RICHARD ROGERS, Planner MARIA CIPRIANI, Planner RICK ROY, Report Graphics ELIZABETH ROBERTS, Word Processor REVISED BENNETT VALLEY AREA PLAN 2008 PETE PARKINSON, PRMD DIRECTOR JENNIFER BARRETT, PRMD Deputy Director of Planning GREG CARR, Comprehensive Planning Manager LISA POSTERNAK, Staff Planner YOLANDA SOLANO, Staff Planner SUE WAXMAN, Production SUSAN DAHL, Production DARCY REINIER, Mapping Bennett Valley Area Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 3 SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................... 4 DESCRIPTION OF BENNETT VALLEY .................................................................................... 5 GOALS AND POLICIES .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • May 5-7, 2021 Sonoma County, CA
    online auction may 5-7, 2021 Sonoma County, CA PRESENTED BY: Thank you to our 2021 sponsors Presented by CONTACT: Clay Popko Regional Banking Executive, Northern California (707) 287-7380 [email protected] Major Sponsors barrel Label CONTACT: CONTACT: Ian Hartnett Mark Peters Business Development Manager Sr. Director of Operations (707) 812-8894 (209) 341-4958 [email protected] [email protected] Closure Wine Sample Program CONTACT: CONTACT: François Margot Andrew Bottene – SR. Vice President Sales Manager Diam Suzanne Gordon – Regional Sales Manager (707) 888-0804 1-800 DRINKWINE [email protected] [email protected] silver Sponsors CONTACT: CONTACT: CONTACT: Gordon Burns Greg Gregory Karen Prusinowski President & Co-Founder Managing Director & Brand Ambassador Account Manager (707) 963-4806 (707) 967-1398 (707) 225-4124 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Lot Overview 01 | ACORN WINERY/ALEGRÍA VINEYARDS | Magnumfy your Alegría I | Winery Only Lot 02 | ALDENALLI WINERY | Savory Succession | Library Wine Collection 03 | ALEXANDER VALLEY VINEYARDS | Royalty | Never Before, Never Again Lot 04 | BALLETTO VINEYARDS | The 10 Percent | Winery Only Lot 05 | BENOVIA WINERY | Cohn’s Clone | Never Before, Never Again Lot 06 | BOB CABRAL WINES | The Essence of a Cool Bloom | Winery Only Lot 07 | BRICOLEUR VINEYARDS | Kick Ranch Kudos | Winery Only Lot 08 | CHALK HILL ESTATE | Clara's Cuvée | Never Before, Never Again Lot 09 | CHATEAU ST. JEAN | Blended Art | Library Wine Collection
    [Show full text]
  • Sonoma County Supervisorial District- 2011
    ± Ash Creek Preston Lake Redwood Mountain Cascade CreekBoggs Creek Caldwell Ranch Hummingbird CreekWildhorse Creek Alderglen Springs Preston Alder Creek Morris Peak Black Oaks Oat Valley Frasier Creek Bear Canyon Anchor Creek Coldwater Canyon Squaw Creek Buckeye Mine Big Sulphur Creek Oat Valley Creek GEYSERS RD Cloverdale Mine Headquarters Sky High Truitt Creek Geyser Rock Burnt Ridge Creek Buck Mountain Little Sulphur Creek Snow Creek Cloverdale Adit Number One Roy Creek Adit Number One-One Hundred TwentyAdit Number Two Galloway Creek Red Mountain Geyser Canyon Black Mountain Harness Camp Geysers Resort Burned Mountain Buckeye Creek Rail Creek Skunk Creek Peavine Ridge Caslamayomi Burnt Ridge Red Mountain Cobb Creek White Creek Porterfield Creek North Branch Little Sulphur CreekDevils Den Canyon Boulder Creek White Mountain Osser Creek North Branch Portfield CreekCloverdale Rancheria Buckman Mines Housing Unit Number TwoHot Springs Creek North Fork Gualala River Howlett Ranch Groshong Gulch Pocket Peak Dianna Rock South Fork Gualala River Log Cabin Ranch Adit Number ThreeCulver-Bear Mine Icaria Creek Flat Ridge Mercuryville Robinson Ridge Thompson Ridge Cadd Fire Trail Big Pepperwood Creek Tom, Mount Barrelli CreekCrocker Creek Rattlesnake Fire Trail Cherry Creek Eureka Mine North Fork Buckeye Creek # North Farallon Asti Geyser Peak Brush Creek Socrates Mine Stanley Ridge Washington School Gualala Point Yorty Creek Rockpile Creek Flat Ridge Creek Rincon De Musalacon Crystal Mine Cold Springs School Ridge Smith Creek # Prichett Peaks
    [Show full text]
  • Lawton, R., R. Hunter, and J. Menze. 2002
    KRIS edition FINAL REPORT Volunteer Monitoring of Suspended Sediment Concentration and Turbidity and Watershed Monitoring of Road Remediation in Annadel State Park Sonoma Creek Watershed Sonoma County, California Prepared by Rebecca Lawton, Rich Hunter, and Jeanna Menze Sonoma Ecology Center 205 First Street West Sonoma, California 95476 707.996.0712 [email protected] Prepared for Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region 1515 Clay Street, Suite 1400 Oakland, CA 94612 September 2002 Final Report Sonoma Ecology Center SSC and Turbidity/Roads Sonoma Creek/Annadel CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction............................................................................................................. 5 1.1 Project Purpose and Scope.................................................................................. 5 1.2 Project Background............................................................................................. 6 2.0 Road Remediation................................................................................................... 9 2.1 Methods of Road Remediation........................................................................... 9 2.2 Results of Road Remediation............................................................................ 10 2.3 Discussion of Road Remediation...................................................................... 11 3.0 Project Monitoring................................................................................................ 11 3.1 Photopoint Analysis .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 67, No. 226/Friday, November 22, 2002/Proposed Rules a Petition for Review Are Contract Send to OHA a Copy of the Solicitation 34
    70352 Federal Register/Vol. 67, No. 226/Friday, November 22, 2002/Proposed Rules a petition for review are contract send to OHA a copy of the solicitation 34. Amend § 134.316(a) by adding the specific, such as compliance with the relating to the NAICS code appeal. following sentence at the end to read as nonmanufacturer rule (see § 121.406(b)), (5) After close of the record, OHA will follows: or joint venture or ostensible issue a decision and inform all subcontractor rule (see § 121.103(h)). interested parties, including the § 134.316 The decision. 29. Revise § 121.1103 to read as appellant and contracting officer. If (a) * * * The Judge will not decide follows: OHA's decision is received by the substantive issues raised for the first time on appeal, or which have been § 121.1103 What are the procedures for contracting officer before the date offers are due, the solicitation must be abandoned or become moot. appealing a NAICS code designation? amended if the contracting officer's (a) Any interested party adversely designation of the NAICS code is Dated: November 8, 2002. affected by a NAICS code designation reversed. If OHA's decision is received Hector V. Barreto, may appeal the designation to OHA. by the contracting officer after the due Administrator. The only exception is that, for a sole date of initial offers, the decision will source contract reserved under SBA's not apply to the pending procurement, [FR Doc. 02-29272 Filed 11-21-02; 8:45 am] 8(a) Business Development program (see but will apply to future solicitations for BILLING CODE 8025-01-P part 124 of this chapter), only SBA's the same products or services.
    [Show full text]