DOCSLIB.ORG

Securities and Exchange Commission § 240.17Ad–11

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Securities and Exchange Commission § 240.17Ad–11 Securities and Exchange Commission § 240.17Ad–11 the preceding month pursuant to para- are not returned to the transfer agent graph (g) of this section; and within the additional thirty-day pe- (ii) The reason for the buy-in. riod, the transfer agent immediately (d) Every co-transfer agent shall re- must execute the buy-in in accordance spond promptly to all inquiries from with paragraph (g)(1) of this section. the recordkeeping transfer agent re- (3) If the certificates involved are garding records required to be dis- covered by a surety bond indemnifying patched or mailed by the co-transfer the transfer agent for all expenses in- agent pursuant to § 240.17Ad–10(c). For curred as a result of actual the purposes of this paragraph, overissuance, the transfer agent need ‘‘promptly’’ means within five business not buy in the securities. The transfer days of receipt of an inquiry from a agent, however, shall devote diligent recordkeeping transfer agent. attention to resolving the overissuance (e) Every recordkeeping transfer and recovering the certificates. agent shall maintain and keep current (4) For purposes of this paragraph, an accurate control book for each issue discovery of the overissuance occurs of securities. A change in the control when the transfer agent identifies the book shall not be made except upon erroneously issued certificate(s) and written authorization from a duly au- the registered securityholder(s). thorized agent of the issuer. (h) Subsequent to the effective date (f) Every recordkeeping transfer of this section, registered transfer agent shall retain a record of all cer- agents that: tificate detail deleted from the master (1) Assume the maintenance and up- securityholder file for a period of six dating of master securityholder files years from the date of deletion. In lieu from predecessor transfer agents, of maintaining a hard copy, a record- (2) Establish a new master keeping transfer agent may comply securityholder file for a particular with this paragraph by complying with issue, or § 240.17Ad–7(f) or § 240.17Ad–7(g). (3) Convert from manual to auto- (g)(1) A registered transfer agent, in mated systems, the event of any actual physical must carry over any existing certifi- overissuance that such transfer agent cate detail required by this section on caused and of which it has knowledge, the master securityholder file. shall, within 60 days of the discovery of such overissuance, buy in securities A recordkeeping transfer agent shall equal to the number of shares in the not be required to add certificate detail case of equity securities or the prin- to the master securityholder file re- cipal dollar amount in the case of debt specting certificates issued prior to the securities. During the sixty-day period, effective date of this section. the registered transfer agent shall de- (Secs. 2, 17(a), 17A(d) and 23(a) thereof, 15 vote diligent attention to resolving the U.S.C. 78b, 78q(a), 78q–1(d) and 78w(a)) overissuance and recovering the cer- [48 FR 28246, June 21, 1983, as amended at 51 tificates. This paragraph requires a FR 5708, Feb. 18, 1986] buy-in only by the transfer agent that erroneously issued the certificate(s) § 240.17Ad–11 Reports regarding aged giving rise to the physical record differences, buy-ins and fail- overissuance, and applies only to those ure to post certificate detail to mas- physical overissuances created by ter securityholder and subsidiary transfers or issuances subsequent to files. September 30, 1983. (a) Definitions. (1) Issuer capitalization (2) If a transfer agent obtains a letter means the market value of the issuer’s from the party holding the overissued authorized and outstanding equity se- certificates that confirms that the curities or, with respect to a municipal overissued certificate(s) will be re- securities issuer, the market value of turned to the transfer agent not later all debt issues for which the transfer than thirty days after the expiration of agent performs recordkeeping func- the sixty-day period, the transfer agent tions on behalf of that issuer, deter- need not buy in securities by the six- mined by reference to the control book tieth day. If, however, the certificate(s) and current market prices. 509 VerDate Mar<15>2010 11:11 May 17, 2010 Jkt 220056 PO 00000 Frm 00519 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\220056.XXX 220056 wwoods2 on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with CFR § 240.17Ad–11 17 CFR Ch. II (4–1–10 Edition) (2) An aged record difference is a which the aged record difference exists record difference that has existed for or for which the buy-in occurred; or more than thirty calendar days. (C) If it acts as a service company, to (b) Reports to Issuers. (1) Within ten the named transfer agent; and business days following the end of each (ii) By every named transfer agent month, every recordkeeping transfer that is engaged by an issuer to main- agent shall report the information tain and update the master specified in paragraph (d)(1) of this sec- securityholder file: tion to the persons specified in para- (A) To the official performing cor- graph (b)(3) of this section, when the porate secretary functions for the aggregate market value of aged record issuer of the securities for which the differences in all equity securities aged record difference exists or for issues or debt securities issues main- tained on behalf of a particular issuer which the buy-in occurred; or exceeds the thresholds set forth in the (B) With respect to an issue of munic- table below. ipal securities, to the chief financial officer of the issuer of the securities for Aggregate market value which the aged record difference exists of aged record differences or for which the buy-in occurred. Issuer capitalization exceeds (c) Reports to appropriate regulatory For equity For debt se- securities curities agencies (1) Within ten business days following the end of each calendar (1) $5 million or less .................. $50,000 $100,000 (2) Greater than $5 million but quarter, every recordkeeping transfer less than $50 million .............. 250,000 500,000 agent shall report the information (3) Greater than $50 million but specified in paragraph (d)(1) of this sec- less than $150 million ............ 500,000 1,000,000 tion to its appropriate regulatory agen- (4) Greater than $150 million .... 1,000,000 2,000,000 cy in accordance with § 240.17Ad–2(h), (2) Within ten business days fol- when the aggregate market value of lowing the end of each month (or with- aged record differences for all issues in ten days thereafter in the case of a for which it performs recordkeeping named transfer agent that receives a functions exceeds the thresholds speci- report from a service company pursu- fied below: ant to paragraph (b)(3)(i)(C)), every rec- (i) $300,000 if it is a recordkeeping ordkeeping transfer agent shall report transfer agent for 5 or fewer issues; the information specified in paragraph (ii) $500,000 for 6–24 issues; (d)(2) of this section to the persons (iii) $800,000 for 25–49 issues; specified in paragraph (b)(3) of this sec- (iv) $1 million for 50–74 issues; tion, with respect to each issue of secu- (v) $1.2 million for 75–99 issues; rities for which it acts as record- (vi) $1.4 million for 100–499 issues; keeping transfer agent, concerning any (vii) $1.6 million for 500–999 issues; securities bought-in pursuant to § 240.17Ad–10(g) or reported as bought-in (viii) $2.6 million for 1,000–1,999 pursuant to § 240.17Ad–10(c) during the issues; and preceding month. (ix) An additional $1 million for each (3) The report shall be sent: additional 1,000 issues. (i) By every recordkeeping transfer (2) Within ten business days fol- agent (other than a recordkeeping lowing the end of each calendar quar- transfer agent that performs transfer ter, every recordkeeping transfer agent agent functions solely for its own secu- shall report the information specified rities): in paragraph (d)(2) of this section to its (A) To the official performing cor- appropriate regulatory agency in ac- porate secretary functions for the cordance with § 240.17Ad–2(h), con- issuer of the securities for which the cerning buy-ins of all issues for which aged record difference exists or for it acts as recordkeeping transfer agent, which the buy-in occurred; when the aggregate market value of all (B) With respect to an issue of munic- buy-ins executed pursuant to ipal securities, to the chief financial § 240.17Ad–10(g) during that calendar officer of the issuer of the securities for quarter exceeds $100,000. 510 VerDate Mar<15>2010 11:11 May 17, 2010 Jkt 220056 PO 00000 Frm 00520 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\220056.XXX 220056 wwoods2 on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with CFR Securities and Exchange Commission § 240.17Ad–13 (3) When the recordkeeping transfer § 240.17Ad–12 Safeguarding of funds agent has any debits or credits for se- and securities. curities transferred, purchased, re- (a) Any registered transfer agent deemed or issued that are unposted to that has custody or possession of any the master securityholder and/or sub- funds or securities related to its trans- sidiary files for more than five business fer agent activities shall assure that: days after debits and credits are re- (1) All such securities are held in quired to be posted to the master safekeeping and are handled, in light of securityholder file or subsidiary files all facts and circumstances, in a man- pursuant to § 240.17Ad–10, it shall im- ner reasonably free from risk of theft, mediately report such fact to its appro- loss or destruction (other than by a priate regulatory agency in accordance transfer agent’s certificate destruction with § 240.17Ad–2(h) and shall state in procedures pursuant to § 240.17Ad-19); that report what steps have been, and and are being, taken to correct the situa- tion.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Supreme Court of Texas
    ■■IT Misc. Docket No. AND*-':. ■rx In The Supreme Court of Texas IN RE MOTION TO TRANSFER AND CONSOLIDATE APPEALS OF RELA TED AD VALOREM TAX SUITS MOTION TO TRANSFER APPEALS PENDING BEFORE THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS AND THE THDXTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS P. Jefferson Ballew Shannon H. Ratliff State Bar No. 16573000 State Bar No. 01654980 Adrienne E. Dominguez Lisa A. Paulson State Bar No.00784732 State Bar No. 00793630 Thompson & Knight LLP Ratliff Law Firm, PLLC 600 Congress Avenue, Suite 3100 1700 Pacific Avenue, Suite 3300 Austin, Texas 78701 Dallas, Texas 75201 (512)493-9600 (214) 969-1700 FAX: (512) 493-9625 FAX: (214) 969-1751 ATTORNEYS FOR CHEVRON U.S.A., ATTORNEYS FOR MOBIL INC. a/k/a CHEVRON PRODUCTS PRODUCING TEXAS & NEW COMPANY, TEXACO INC., TEXACO MEXICO, INC. and SOCONY MOBIL EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION COMPANY, INC. INC. and FOUR STAR OIL & GAS COMPANY Misc. Docket No. In The Supreme Court of Texas IN RE MOTION TO TRANSFER AND CONSOLIDA TE APPEALS OF RELA TED AD VALOREM TAX SUITS MOTION TO TRANSFER APPEALS PENDING BEFORE THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS AND THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS P. Jefferson Ballew Shannon H. Ratliff State Bar No. 01654980 State Bar No. 16573000 Adrienne E. Dominguez Lisa A. Paulson State Bar No. 00793630 State Bar No.00784732 Thompson & Knight LLP Ratliff Law Firm, PLLC 1700 Pacific Avenue, Suite 3300 600 Congress Avenue, Suite 3100 Dallas, Texas 75201 Austin, Texas 78701 (214) 969-1700 (512)493-9600 FAX: (214) 969-1751 FAX: (512) 493-9625 ATTORNEYS FOR CHEVRON U.S.A., ATTORNEYS FOR MOBIL INC.
    [Show full text]
  • 1985 Chapter 4
    23 85-86 Wis.. Stats ., LEGISLATIVE DISTRICTS 4.001 CHAPTER 4 SENATE AND ASSEMBLY DISTRICTS SUBCHAPTERI 4 .45 Forty-fifth assembly district, GENERAL PROVISIONS 446 Forty-sixth assembly district 4 Legislative redistricting ; equal population . 447 Forty-seventh assembly district . 4 .002 Municipal wards . 4.48. Forty-eighth assembly district . 4 .003 Description of boundaries. 4 .49 Forty-ninth assembly district . 4004 Elections to the legislature. 4 .50 Fiftieth assembly district. 4005 Territory omitted from legislative redistricting, 4, 51 Fifty-first assembly district SUBCHAPTER 11 452 Fifty-second assembly district SENATE DISTRICTS 453 Fifty-third assembly district.. 4 .009 Senate districts, 4 . 54 Fifty-foureh assembly district.. SUBCHAPTER III 4 .55 Fifty-fifth assembly district, ASSEMBLY DISTRICTS 4 .56 Fifty-sixth assembly district . 401 First assembly district . 4.57 Fifty-seventh assembly district . 402 Second assembly district. 4,58 Fifty-eighth assembly district . 403 Third assembly district. 4 .59 Fifty-ninth assembly district. 404 Fourth assembly district . 4 .60 Sixtieth assembly district . 405 Fifth assembly district.. 4 ,61 Sixty-first assembly district . 406 Sixth assembly district . 4 .62 Sixty-second assembly district . 407 Seventh assembly district . Eighth assembly district . 4,63 Sixty-third assembly district . 408 4 .64 Sixty-fourth assembly district 409 Ninth assembly district . 465 Sixty-fifth assembly district. 4.100 Tenth assembly district 4 . 66 . Sixty-sixth assembly district 4.11 Eleventh assembly district . Twelfth assembly distr ict. 467 Sixty-seventh assembly district . 412 4 . 413 'Thirteenth assembly district. 68 Sixty-eighth assembly district . 4 .14 Fourteenth assembly district. 469 Sixty-ninth assembly district . 4 . 15.- Fifteenth assembly district .
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Motions California State Retirees (Csr) Board of Directors Meeting
    SUMMARY OF MOTIONS CALIFORNIA STATE RETIREES (CSR) BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING Holiday Inn, Sacramento February 22, 2018 7. Approval of October 26, 2017 Board Meeting Minutes CSR 1/18/1 MOTION: Oliveira, second by Hueg - that the CSR Board of Directors approve the minutes of the October 26, 2017 meeting as printed. CARRIED. 11. Program Reports - HQ CSR 2/18/1 MOTION: Fountain, second by Hueg – that the CSR Board of Directors buy the three promotion items, hats, totes and lapel pins, in bulk and send out numbers to chapters. CARRIED. 12. Political Action Committee CSR 3/18/1 MOTION: Oliveira, second by Fountain – that the CSR Board of Directors endorse incumbents Controller Betty Yee and Secretary of State Alex Padilla for reelection. CARRIED. CSR 4/18/1 MOTION: Umemoto, second by Jimenez – that the CSR Board of Directors endorse Treasurer Fiona Ma. CARRIED. CSR 5/18/1 MOTION: Jimenez, second by Oliveira – that the CSR Board of Directors endorse the following Assembly incumbents seeking reelection: AD 01 Brian Dahle (R-Bieber), AD 02 Jim Wood (D-Healdsburg), AD 03 James Gallagher (R-Nicolaus), AD 04 Cecilia Aguiar-Curry (D-Napa), AD 05 Frank Bigelow (R-O’Neals), AD 06 Kevin Kiley (R-El Dorado Hills), AD 07 Kevin McCarty (D-Sacramento), AD 08 Ken Cooley (D-Rancho Cordova), AD 09 Jim Cooper (D-Elk Grove), AD 10 Marc Levine (D-San Rafael), AD 11 Jim Frazier (D-Oakley), AD 12 Heath Flora (R-Modesto), AD 13 Susan Eggman (D-Stockton), AD 14 Tim Grayson (D-Concord), AD 16 Catharine Baker (D-Dublin), AD 17 David Chiu (D-San Francisco), AD 18 Rob Bonta (D-Alameda), AD 19 Phil Ting (D-San Francisco), AD 20 Bill Quirk (D- Hayward), AD 21 Adam Gray (D-Merced).
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 80, No. 202/Tuesday, October
    63600 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 202 / Tuesday, October 20, 2015 / Notices Comments may be submitted by any of SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE total of 12,000 external hours annually the following methods: COMMISSION (120 hours × 100 reports). The burden was estimated using Commission review Electronic Comments [SEC File No. 270–263; OMB Control No. 3235–0275] of filed Rule 17Ad–13 reports. The • Use the Commission’s Internet Commission estimates that, on average, comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ Submission for OMB Review; 120 hours are needed to perform the rules/sro.shtml); or Comment Request study, prepare the report, and retain the required records on an annual basis. • Send an email to rule-comments@ Upon Written Request, Copies Available Assuming an average hourly rate of an sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– From: Securities and Exchange independent accountant of $60, the CBOE–2015–085 on the subject line. Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC average total annual cost of the report is Paper Comments 20549–2736. $7,200. The total annual cost for the • approximate 100 respondents is Send paper comments in triplicate Extension: approximately $720,000. to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Rule 17Ad–13. The retention period for the Commission, 100 F Street NE., Notice is hereby given that pursuant Washington, DC 20549–1090. to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 recordkeeping requirement under Rule 17Ad–13 is three years following the All submissions should refer to File (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) (‘‘PRA’’), the Securities and Exchange Commission date of a report prepared pursuant to the Number SR–CBOE–2015–085.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 63, No. 133/Monday, July 13, 1998/Rules
    37688 Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 133 / Monday, July 13, 1998 / Rules and Regulations [FR Doc. 98±18292 Filed 7±10±98; 8:45 am] a transfer agent that may not be Year The Commission views the Year 2000 BILLING CODE 8010±01±E 2000 compliant. problem as an extremely serious issue. EFFECTIVE DATE: August 12, 1998. A failure to assess properly the extent of the problem, remediate systems that are SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jerry not Year 2000 compliant, and then test COMMISSION W. Carpenter, Assistant Director, 202/ those systems could endanger the 942±4187; Thomas C. Etter, Jr., Special nation's capital markets and place at 17 CFR Part 240 Counsel, 202/942±0178; or Jeffrey risk the assets of millions of investors. Mooney, Special Counsel, 202/942± In light of this, both transfer agents and [Release No. 34±40163; File No. S7±8±98] 4174, Division of Market Regulation, the Commission are working hard to Securities and Exchange Commission, address the industry's Year 2000 RIN 3235±AH42 450 Fifth Street, NW., Mail Stop 10±1, Problems. Washington, DC 20549. As part of its ongoing efforts relating Year 2000 Readiness Reports To Be SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: to the Year 2000 on March 5, 1998, the Made by Certain Transfer Agents Commission requested comment on I. Introduction proposed Rule 17Ad±18 that would AGENCY: Securities and Exchange At midnight on December 31, 1999, require transfer agents to file at least one Commission. unless the proper modifications have report with the Commission regarding ACTION: Final
    [Show full text]
  • January 13, 2021 Governor Gavin Newsom Office of the Governor State Capitol Sacramento, CA 95814
    January 13, 2021 Governor Gavin Newsom Office of the Governor State Capitol Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear Governor Newsom, Your recently-announced goal of distributing one million vaccines within 10 days is the most urgent priority facing the State. To ensure the efficient delivery of vaccines, we respectfully request your consideration of the following ideas and requests from our constituent communities: 1) The incoming Biden Administration announced last week its aim to release nearly all available vaccine to states. As counties continue to report uncertainty about the quantity of vaccines that they can expect over the next several weeks, and to better prepare for a larger roll out, including staffing and how to set up sites, please provide the following information to counties: a. A reliable forecast for expected vaccine quantity over the next four weeks; b. Updated forecasts at least weekly, if there are large variations; c. Supply updates on a 7-day rolling basis for future weeks, after the initial four week period is complete. 2) Please build on your recent efforts to expand authorization for who can administer the vaccines and how they can reach vaccine sites efficiently by taking the following actions: a. Complete the authorization of nursing students, retired medical professionals, and firefighters to administer vaccine shots; b. Expand the use of the National Guard in delivering vaccines across the state, and charge its members with medical training to administer vaccines. 3) While you have announced a plan for the necessary $300 million to distribute vaccines and there is pending guidance from the federal government about additional vaccine distribution funding, please reassure counties that reimbursements for their role in the vaccination process will be forthcoming.
    [Show full text]
  • A/T/N: an Unbiased Descriptive Classification Scheme for Alzheimer Disease Biomarkers
    VIEWS & REVIEWS A/T/N: An unbiased descriptive classification scheme for Alzheimer disease biomarkers Clifford R. Jack, Jr., MD ABSTRACT David A. Bennett, MD Biomarkers have become an essential component of Alzheimer disease (AD) research and Kaj Blennow, MD, PhD because of the pervasiveness of AD pathology in the elderly, the same biomarkers are used in Maria C. Carrillo, PhD cognitive aging research. A number of current issues suggest that an unbiased descriptive clas- Howard H. Feldman, sification scheme for these biomarkers would be useful. We propose the “A/T/N” system in which 7 MD major AD biomarkers are divided into 3 binary categories based on the nature of the pathophys- Giovanni B. Frisoni, MD iology that each measures. “A” refers to the value of a b-amyloid biomarker (amyloid PET or CSF Harald Hampel, MD, Ab42); “T,” the value of a tau biomarker (CSF phospho tau, or tau PET); and “N,” biomarkers of PhD neurodegeneration or neuronal injury ([18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose–PET, structural MRI, or CSF total William J. Jagust, MD tau). Each biomarker category is rated as positive or negative. An individual score might appear as Keith A. Johnson, MD A1/T1/N2,orA1/T2/N2, etc. The A/T/N system includes the new modality tau PET. It is agnos- David S. Knopman, MD tic to the temporal ordering of mechanisms underlying AD pathogenesis. It includes all individuals Ronald C. Petersen, MD, in any population regardless of the mix of biomarker findings and therefore is suited to population PhD studies of cognitive aging. It does not specify disease labels and thus is not a diagnostic classi- Philip Scheltens, MD, fication system.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CRISIS of the THIRD CENTURY AD. in the ROMAN EMPIRE: a MODERN MYTH? by LUKAS DE BLOIS
    THE CRISIS OF THE THIRD CENTURY AD. IN THE ROMAN EMPIRE: A MODERN MYTH? By LUKAS DE BLOIS Until weIl into the seventies of the last century the third century AD. was perceived as aperiod of crisis, a crisis which was already announced under the emperor Marcus Aurelius A.D. 161-180), whose reign was characterised by warfare and epidemics. Many observers saw the third century crisis as a decisive period of transition to Medieval History. In a highly rhetorical and suggestive passage in his Birth 0/ the Western Economy, Robert Latouche describes the second and third quarters of the third century AD. as " .. a sinister age, the least known of the whole history of Rome .. " and he teIls us: "After the reign of the Severi we seem to plunge into a long tunnel, to emerge only at the beginning of the Late Empire under Diocletian, and when we step out again into daylight unfamiliar country lies all about US".I In later decades the third century crisis was seen as a complex historical process, brought about by the interaction of many different factors. Geza Alföldy summarlses the various aspects of the crisis that dominated the history of the Roman empire from 249 to 284 in nine points: the switching from the rule of an emperor to that of a military despot, the general instability, the growing power of the armies, the increasing influence of the military provinces such as those along the Danube, social shifts, economic problems, the decrease in and unequal distribution of the population, a religious and moral crisis and invasions of foreign peoples in practically all border regions and even beyond, into the heartlands of the empire.
    [Show full text]
  • Preview of November Legislative Races DISTRICT SEAT HOLDER
    Preview of November Legislative Races "TOP TWO" NOVEMBER CANDIDATES CURRENT CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE TOTAL % OF JUNE VOTE (RESULTS FROM JUNE 5 PRIMARY) DISTRICT SEAT HOLDER PROJECTION 1 2 DEM. REP. OTHER AD 01 Brian Dahle Safe Rep Brian Dahle 64% Caleen Sisk 24% 33% 64% 3% AD 02 Jim Wood Safe Dem Jim Wood 70% Matt Heath 30% 70% 30% - AD 03 James Gallagher Safe Rep James Gallagher 65% Sonia Aery 35% 35% 65% - AD 04 Cecilia Aguiar-Curry Safe Dem Cecilia Aguiar-Curry 100% - - 100% - - AD 05 Frank Bigelow Safe Rep Frank Bigelow 62% Carla Neal** 38% 38% 62% - AD 06 Kevin Kiley Safe Rep Kevin Kiley 61% Jackie Smith 39% 39% 61% - AD 07 Kevin McCarty Safe Dem Kevin McCarty 100% - - 100% - - AD 08 Ken Cooley Likely Dem Ken Cooley 54% Melinda Avery 41% 54% 41% 5% AD 09 Jim Cooper Safe Dem Jim Cooper 68% Harry He 16% 100% - - AD 10 Marc Levine Safe Dem Marc Levine 80% Dan Monte 20% 100% - - AD 11 Jim Frazier Safe Dem Jim Frazier 48% Lisa Romero 38% 62% 38% - AD 12 Heath Flora Safe Rep Heath Flora 64% Robert Chase 36% 36% 64% - AD 13 Susan Eggman Safe Dem Susan Eggman 53% Antonio Garcia 31% 69% 31% - AD 14 Tin Grayson Safe Dem Tim Grayson 84% Aasim Yahya 16% 100% - - AD 15 Tony Thurmond (NR) Safe Dem Buffy Wicks 31% Jovanka Beckles 16% 93% 7% - AD 16 Catharine Baker Likely Rep Catharine Baker 57% Rebecca Bauer-Kahan 43% 43% 57% - AD 17 David Chiu Safe Dem David Chiu 82% Alejandro Fernandez 18% 100% - - AD 18 Rob Bonta Safe Dem Rob Bonta 89% Stephen Slauson 11% 89% 11% - AD 19 Phil Ting Safe Dem Phil Ting 80% Keith Bogdon 16% 80% 16% 4% AD 20 Bill Quirk
    [Show full text]
  • Adams County
    State of Indiana Department of Natural Resources Division of Water Previously published by the INDIANA FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER RESOURCES COMMISSI0N Indianapolis, Indiana BENCHMARK AND REFERENCE MARK DESCRIPTIONS ADAMS COUNTY The fieldwork was done by the Indiana Flood Control and Water Resources Commission and the Indiana Department of Natural Resources. All levels lines were started from and closed on either First or Second Order benchmarks established by the U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey. DATUM: Elevations given in this list have been determined from standard elevations of U.S.C. & G.S. benchmarks, based on the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 Publication Revised June 1986 June 1999 1 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WATER Adams County The following elevations were determined in July 1952 by leveling from USC&GS BM K 225, standard elevation 832.574 feet. All level circuits closed within allowable limits for first order leveling. The standard elevation of BM K 225, as published on April 15, 1952 by the USC&GS, is based on NGVD 1929. IFC&WRC TBM WR 33, 1952 In Adams County, Linn Grove Quad., on the south line of the West ½ of Sec. 27, T. 26 N., R. 13 E., 2nd PM; 2 miles northwest of Linn Grove; set in the south side of a 20-inch Elm tree, 0.25 mile west along a fence line from an old school house at the intersection of 18 South Road and 38 ½ West Road, 150 feet northeast of the Wabash River, 25 feet east of a fence corner post, 1.5 feet above the ground; a railroad spike.
    [Show full text]
  • Dysregulated Gene-Associated Biomarkers for Alzheimer's Disease
    Translational Neuroscience 2021; 12: 83–95 Research Article Min Li, Rongxin Geng, Chen Li, Fantao Meng, Hongwei Zhao, Jing Liu, Juanjuan Dai, Xuezhen Wang* Dysregulated gene-associated biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease and aging https://doi.org/10.1515/tnsci-2021-0009 contribute to the early detection, differential diagnosis, received September 24, 2020; accepted January 18, 2021 treatment, and pathological analysis of AD. Abstract: Alzheimer’s disease (AD), the most common Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease, aging, differentially type of dementia, is a neurodegenerative disorder with expressed genes, blood, hippocampus a hidden onset, including difficult early detection and diagnosis. Nevertheless, the new crucial biomarkers for the diagnosis and pathogenesis of AD need to be explored further. Here, the common differentially expressed genes 1 Introduction (DEGs) were identified through a comprehensive analysis ’ ( ) of gene expression profiles from the Gene Expression Alzheimer s disease AD , the most common cause of Omnibus (GEO) database. Furthermore, Gene Ontology dementia, has become an increasingly severe global public and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway health concern, placing a colossal burden on both families [ ] - analyses revealed that these DEGs were mainly asso- and society 1 .ADisanagerelated disease characterized ffi ciated with biological processes, cellular components, by initial di culties with memory, progressive cognitive and molecular functions, which are involved in multiple impairment, dysfunctions in daily activities, and abnormal cellular functions. Next, we found that 9 of the 24 genes mental and behavioral changes. The cardinal pathological fi - showed the same regulatory changes in the blood of hallmarks of AD include intracellular neuro brillary tan -β - patients with AD compared to those in the GEO database, gles and accumulation of extracellular amyloid condu [ ] and 2 of the 24 genes showed a significant correlation cive to senile plaques 2 .
    [Show full text]
  • ASA Insurance Agency Corporation 14-12231
    STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT INSURANCE AND FINANCIAL SERVICES Before the Director of the Department of Insurance and Financial Services In the matter of: ALI ALI ENFORCEMENT CASE N0.14-12231 System ID No. 0593171 AAS INSURANCE AGENCY CORPORATION System ID No. 0097770 ASA INSURANCE AGENCY CORPORATION System ID No. 0025475 Respondents. ------------------------------~/ FINAL ORDER TO REVOKE INSURANCE PRODUCER LICENSE Issued and entered on 'YY}ah ad.. 13 , 2015, Teri L. Morante, Chief Deputy Director I. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. On January 7, 2015, pursuant to Section 1242 of the Insurance Code (Code), MCL 500. 1242, and Section 92 of the Michigan Admini::;tralivt: Procedure::; Act (APA), MCL 24.292, the Chief Deputy Director of the Department of Insurance and Financial Services (DIFS) issued to Respondents an Order of Summary Suspension (Order), Notice of Opportunity for Hearing and Notice oflntent to Revoke License (Notice). 2. The Order and Notice, served on Respondents via certified mail, was received by Respondent ASA Insurance Agency Corporation on January 14, 2015, and received by Respondent AAS Insurance Agency Corporation on January 16, 2015, as evidenced by the signed certified mail Domestic Return Receipts. 3. The order and Notice served on Ali Ali, by first class mail to his last known address, was not returned as undeliverable. Final Order to Revoke Insurance Producer License Enforcement Case No. 14-11983 Page 2 of3 4. The Order and Notice, incorporated herein, contained allegations that Respondents engaged in conduct providing justification for sanctions pursuant to Section 1239(1)(h) of the Code, MCL 500.1239(1)(h). Specifically, the Order and Notice alleged that Respondents were selling fraudulent insurance certificates.
    [Show full text]