Hormonal Therapy
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Prospective Study on Gynaecological Effects of Two Antioestrogens Tamoxifen and Toremifene in Postmenopausal Women
British Journal of Cancer (2001) 84(7), 897–902 © 2001 Cancer Research Campaign doi: 10.1054/ bjoc.2001.1703, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on http://www.bjcancer.com Prospective study on gynaecological effects of two antioestrogens tamoxifen and toremifene in postmenopausal women MB Marttunen1, B Cacciatore1, P Hietanen2, S Pyrhönen2, A Tiitinen1, T Wahlström3 and O Ylikorkala1 1Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, P.O. Box 140, FIN-00029 HYKS, Finland; 2Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, P.O. Box 180, FIN-00029 HYKS, Finland; 3Department of Pathology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, P.O. Box 140, FIN-00029 HYKS, Finland Summary To assess and compare the gynaecological consequences of the use of 2 antioestrogens we examined 167 postmenopausal breast cancer patients before and during the use of either tamoxifen (20 mg/day, n = 84) or toremifene (40 mg/day, n = 83) as an adjuvant treatment of stage II–III breast cancer. Detailed interview concerning menopausal symptoms, pelvic examination including transvaginal sonography (TVS) and collection of endometrial sample were performed at baseline and at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months of treatment. In a subgroup of 30 women (15 using tamoxifen and 15 toremifene) pulsatility index (PI) in an uterine artery was measured before and at 6 and 12 months of treatment. The mean (±SD) follow-up time was 2.3 ± 0.8 years. 35% of the patients complained of vasomotor symptoms before the start of the trial. This rate increased to 60.0% during the first year of the trial, being similar among patients using tamoxifen (57.1%) and toremifene (62.7%). -
Phthalates: Toxicology and Food Safety – a Review
Czech J. Food Sci. Vol. 23, No. 6: 217–223 Phthalates: Toxicology and Food Safety – a Review PŘEMYSL MIKULA1, ZDEŇKA SVOBODOVÁ1 and MIRIAM SMUTNÁ2 1Department of Veterinary Public Health and Toxicology and 2Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic Abstract MIKULA P., SVOBODOVÁ Z., SMUTNÁ M. (2005): Phthalates: toxicology and food safety – a review. Czech J. Food Sci., 23: 217–223. Phthalates are organic substances used mainly as plasticisers in the manufacture of plastics. They are ubiquitous in the environment. Although tests in rodents have demonstrated numerous negative effects of phthalates, it is still unclear whether the exposure to phthalates may also damage human health. This paper describes phthalate toxicity and toxicokinetics, explains the mechanisms of phthalate action, and outlines the issues relating to the presence of phthalates in foods. Keywords: di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate; dibutyl phthalate; peroxisome proliferators; reproductive toxicity Phthalic acid esters, often also called phtha- air, soil, food, etc.). People as well as animals lates, are organic substances frequently used can be exposed to these compounds through in many industries. They are usually colourless ingestion, inhalation or dermal exposure, and or slightly yellowish oily and odourless liquids iatrogenic exposure to phthalates from blood only very slightly soluble in water. Phthalates are bags, injection syringes, intravenous canyllas much more readily soluble in organic solvents, and catheters, and from plastic parts of dialysers and the longer their side chain, the higher their is also a possibility (VELÍŠEK 1999; ČERNÁ 2000; liposolubility and the boiling point. Phthalates LOVEKAMP-SWAN & DAVIS 2003). -
Aromasin (Exemestane)
HIGHLIGHTS OF PRESCRIBING INFORMATION ------------------------------ADVERSE REACTIONS------------------------------ These highlights do not include all the information needed to use • Early breast cancer: Adverse reactions occurring in ≥10% of patients in AROMASIN safely and effectively. See full prescribing information for any treatment group (AROMASIN vs. tamoxifen) were hot flushes AROMASIN. (21.2% vs. 19.9%), fatigue (16.1% vs. 14.7%), arthralgia (14.6% vs. 8.6%), headache (13.1% vs. 10.8%), insomnia (12.4% vs. 8.9%), and AROMASIN® (exemestane) tablets, for oral use increased sweating (11.8% vs. 10.4%). Discontinuation rates due to AEs Initial U.S. Approval: 1999 were similar between AROMASIN and tamoxifen (6.3% vs. 5.1%). Incidences of cardiac ischemic events (myocardial infarction, angina, ----------------------------INDICATIONS AND USAGE--------------------------- and myocardial ischemia) were AROMASIN 1.6%, tamoxifen 0.6%. AROMASIN is an aromatase inhibitor indicated for: Incidence of cardiac failure: AROMASIN 0.4%, tamoxifen 0.3% (6, • adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal women with estrogen-receptor 6.1). positive early breast cancer who have received two to three years of • Advanced breast cancer: Most common adverse reactions were mild to tamoxifen and are switched to AROMASIN for completion of a total of moderate and included hot flushes (13% vs. 5%), nausea (9% vs. 5%), five consecutive years of adjuvant hormonal therapy (14.1). fatigue (8% vs. 10%), increased sweating (4% vs. 8%), and increased • treatment of advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women whose appetite (3% vs. 6%) for AROMASIN and megestrol acetate, disease has progressed following tamoxifen therapy (14.2). respectively (6, 6.1). ----------------------DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION----------------------- To report SUSPECTED ADVERSE REACTIONS, contact Pfizer Inc at Recommended Dose: One 25 mg tablet once daily after a meal (2.1). -
The Disposition of Morphine and Its 3- and 6-Glucuronide Metabolites in Humans
>+'è ,'i5 1. The Disposition of Morphine and its 3- and 6- Glucuronide Metabolites in Humans and Sheep A Thesis submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Science at the University of Adelaide Robert W. Milne B.Pharm.(Hons), M.Sc. Department of Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology University of Adelaide August 1994 Ar,-,..u i.'..t itttlí I Corrigenda Page 4 The paragraph at the top of the page should be relocated to inimediatèly follow the section heading "1.2 Chemistry" on page 3" Page 42 (lines 2,5 and/) "a1-acid glycoProtein" should read "cr1-acid glycoprotein". Page 90 In the footnote "Amoxicillin" and "Haemacell" should read "Amoxycillin" and "Haemaccel", respectively. Page I 13 (tine -l l) "supernate!' should read "supernatant". ' '(j- Page I 15 (line -9) "supernate" should read "supernatalït1-. Page 135 To the unfinished sentence at the bottom of the page should be added "appears to be responsible for the formation of M3G, but its relative importance remains unknown. It was also proposed that morphine is involved in an enterohepatic cycle." Page 144 Add "Both infusions ceased at 6 hr" to the legend to Figure 6.3. Page 195 (line 2) "was" should fead "were". Page 198 (line l3) "ro re-€xamine" should read "to te-examine". Pages 245 to29l Bibliosraohv: "8r.." should read "Br.". For the reference by Bhargava et aI. (1991), "J. Pharmacol.Exp.Ther." should read "J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther." For the reference by Chapman et aI. (1984), a full-stop should appear after"Biomed" . For the reference by Murphey et aI. -
CASODEX (Bicalutamide)
HIGHLIGHTS OF PRESCRIBING INFORMATION • Gynecomastia and breast pain have been reported during treatment with These highlights do not include all the information needed to use CASODEX 150 mg when used as a single agent. (5.3) CASODEX® safely and effectively. See full prescribing information for • CASODEX is used in combination with an LHRH agonist. LHRH CASODEX. agonists have been shown to cause a reduction in glucose tolerance in CASODEX® (bicalutamide) tablet, for oral use males. Consideration should be given to monitoring blood glucose in Initial U.S. Approval: 1995 patients receiving CASODEX in combination with LHRH agonists. (5.4) -------------------------- RECENT MAJOR CHANGES -------------------------- • Monitoring Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) is recommended. Evaluate Warnings and Precautions (5.2) 10/2017 for clinical progression if PSA increases. (5.5) --------------------------- INDICATIONS AND USAGE -------------------------- ------------------------------ ADVERSE REACTIONS ----------------------------- • CASODEX 50 mg is an androgen receptor inhibitor indicated for use in Adverse reactions that occurred in more than 10% of patients receiving combination therapy with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone CASODEX plus an LHRH-A were: hot flashes, pain (including general, back, (LHRH) analog for the treatment of Stage D2 metastatic carcinoma of pelvic and abdominal), asthenia, constipation, infection, nausea, peripheral the prostate. (1) edema, dyspnea, diarrhea, hematuria, nocturia, and anemia. (6.1) • CASODEX 150 mg daily is not approved for use alone or with other treatments. (1) To report SUSPECTED ADVERSE REACTIONS, contact AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP at 1-800-236-9933 or FDA at 1-800-FDA-1088 or ---------------------- DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION ---------------------- www.fda.gov/medwatch The recommended dose for CASODEX therapy in combination with an LHRH analog is one 50 mg tablet once daily (morning or evening). -
X FACT SHEET
Letrozole For the Patient: Letrozole Other names: FEMARA • Letrozole (LET-roe-zole) is a drug that is used to treat breast cancer. It only works in women who are post-menopausal and producing estrogen outside the ovaries. Many cancers are hormone sensitive (estrogen or progesterone receptor positive) and their growth can be affected by lowering estrogen levels in the body. Letrozole is used to help reduce the amount of estrogen produced by your body and decrease the growth of hormone sensitive tumors. Letrozole is a tablet that you take by mouth. The tablet may contain lactose. • It is important to take letrozole exactly as directed by your doctor. Make sure you understand the directions. • Letrozole may be taken with food or on an empty stomach. • If you miss a dose of letrozole, take it as soon as you can if it is within 12 hours of the missed dose. If it is over 12 hours since your missed dose, skip the missed dose and go back to your usual dosing times. • Other drugs such as tamoxifen (NOLVADEX) and raloxifen (EVISTA) may interact with letrozole. Because letrozole works by reducing the amount of estrogen produced by your body, it is recommended that you avoid taking estrogen replacement therapy such as conjugated estrogens (PREMARIN, C.E.S., ESTRACE, ESTRACOMB, ESTRADERM, ESTRING). Tell your doctor if you are taking this or any other drugs as you may need extra blood tests or your dose may need to be changed. Check with your doctor or pharmacist before you start taking any new drugs. • The drinking of alcohol (in small amounts) does not appear to affect the safety or usefulness of letrozole. -
Tamoxifen, Raloxifene Upheld for Prevention
38 WOMEN’S HEALTH MAY 1, 2010 • FAMILY PRACTICE NEWS Tamoxifen, Raloxifene Upheld for Prevention BY KERRI WACHTER 9,736 on tamoxifen and 9,754 on ralox- 1.24, which was significant (P = .01). Both events) did not appear to be as effective ifene. The differences in numbers are due drugs reduced the risk of invasive breast as tamoxifen (57 events) in preventing WASHINGTON — Tamoxifen and to a combination of loss during follow- cancer by roughly 50% in the original re- noninvasive breast cancer (P = .052). raloxifene offer women at high risk of up or follow-up data becoming available port (median follow-up 47 months). “Now with additional follow-up, those developing breast cancer two effective for women who were lost to follow-up “We have estimated, however, that differences have narrowed,” he said. At options to prevent the disease, based on in the original report. Women on ta- this difference in the raloxifene-treated 8 years, there was no statistical signifi- 8 years of follow-up data for more than moxifen received 20 mg/day and those group represents 76% of tamoxifen’s cance between the two groups with a 19,000 women in the STAR trial. on raloxifene received 60 mg/day. chemopreventative benefit, which trans- risk ratio of 1.22 (P = .12). The relative While tamoxifen proved significantly At an average follow-up of 8 years, the lates into at 38% reduction in invasive risk of 1.22 favors tamoxifen, but ralox- more effective in preventing invasive breast relative risk of invasive breast cancer on breast cancers,” Dr. -
Hormonal Treatment Strategies Tailored to Non-Binary Transgender Individuals
Journal of Clinical Medicine Review Hormonal Treatment Strategies Tailored to Non-Binary Transgender Individuals Carlotta Cocchetti 1, Jiska Ristori 1, Alessia Romani 1, Mario Maggi 2 and Alessandra Daphne Fisher 1,* 1 Andrology, Women’s Endocrinology and Gender Incongruence Unit, Florence University Hospital, 50139 Florence, Italy; [email protected] (C.C); jiska.ristori@unifi.it (J.R.); [email protected] (A.R.) 2 Department of Experimental, Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, Careggi University Hospital, 50139 Florence, Italy; [email protected]fi.it * Correspondence: fi[email protected] Received: 16 April 2020; Accepted: 18 May 2020; Published: 26 May 2020 Abstract: Introduction: To date no standardized hormonal treatment protocols for non-binary transgender individuals have been described in the literature and there is a lack of data regarding their efficacy and safety. Objectives: To suggest possible treatment strategies for non-binary transgender individuals with non-standardized requests and to emphasize the importance of a personalized clinical approach. Methods: A narrative review of pertinent literature on gender-affirming hormonal treatment in transgender persons was performed using PubMed. Results: New hormonal treatment regimens outside those reported in current guidelines should be considered for non-binary transgender individuals, in order to improve psychological well-being and quality of life. In the present review we suggested the use of hormonal and non-hormonal compounds, which—based on their mechanism of action—could be used in these cases depending on clients’ requests. Conclusion: Requests for an individualized hormonal treatment in non-binary transgender individuals represent a future challenge for professionals managing transgender health care. For each case, clinicians should balance the benefits and risks of a personalized non-standardized treatment, actively involving the person in decisions regarding hormonal treatment. -
Hertfordshire Medicines Management Committee (Hmmc) Nafarelin for Endometriosis Amber Initiation – Recommended for Restricted Use
HERTFORDSHIRE MEDICINES MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE (HMMC) NAFARELIN FOR ENDOMETRIOSIS AMBER INITIATION – RECOMMENDED FOR RESTRICTED USE Name: What it is Indication Date Decision NICE / SMC generic decision status Guidance (trade) last revised Nafarelin A potent agonistic The hormonal December Final NICE NG73 2mg/ml analogue of management of 2020 Nasal Spray gonadotrophin endometriosis, (Synarel®) releasing hormone including pain relief and (GnRH) reduction of endometriotic lesions HMMC recommendation: Amber initiation across Hertfordshire (i.e. suitable for primary care prescribing after specialist initiation) as an option in endometriosis Background Information: Gonadorelin analogues (or gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonists [GnRHas]) include buserelin, goserelin, leuprorelin, nafarelin and triptorelin. The current HMMC decision recommends triptorelin as Decapeptyl SR® injection as the gonadorelin analogue of choice within licensed indications (which include endometriosis) link to decision. A request was made by ENHT to use nafarelin nasal spray as an alternative to triptorelin intramuscular injection during the COVID-19 pandemic. The hospital would provide initial 1 month supply, then GPs would continue for further 5 months as an alternative to the patient attending for further clinic appointments for administration of triptorelin. Previously at ENHT, triptorelin was the only gonadorelin analogue on formulary for gynaecological indications. At WHHT buserelin nasal spray 150mcg/dose is RED (hospital only) for infertility & endometriosis indications. Nafarelin nasal spray 2mg/ml is licensed for: . The hormonal management of endometriosis, including pain relief and reduction of endometriotic lesions. Use in controlled ovarian stimulation programmes prior to in-vitro fertilisation, under the supervision of an infertility specialist. Use of nafarelin in endometriosis aims to induce chronic pituitary desensitisation, which gives a menopause-like state maintained over many months. -
Us Anti-Doping Agency
2019U.S. ANTI-DOPING AGENCY WALLET CARDEXAMPLES OF PROHIBITED AND PERMITTED SUBSTANCES AND METHODS Effective Jan. 1 – Dec. 31, 2019 CATEGORIES OF SUBSTANCES PROHIBITED AT ALL TIMES (IN AND OUT-OF-COMPETITION) • Non-Approved Substances: investigational drugs and pharmaceuticals with no approval by a governmental regulatory health authority for human therapeutic use. • Anabolic Agents: androstenediol, androstenedione, bolasterone, boldenone, clenbuterol, danazol, desoxymethyltestosterone (madol), dehydrochlormethyltestosterone (DHCMT), Prasterone (dehydroepiandrosterone, DHEA , Intrarosa) and its prohormones, drostanolone, epitestosterone, methasterone, methyl-1-testosterone, methyltestosterone (Covaryx, EEMT, Est Estrogens-methyltest DS, Methitest), nandrolone, oxandrolone, prostanozol, Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators (enobosarm, (ostarine, MK-2866), andarine, LGD-4033, RAD-140). stanozolol, testosterone and its metabolites or isomers (Androgel), THG, tibolone, trenbolone, zeranol, zilpaterol, and similar substances. • Beta-2 Agonists: All selective and non-selective beta-2 agonists, including all optical isomers, are prohibited. Most inhaled beta-2 agonists are prohibited, including arformoterol (Brovana), fenoterol, higenamine (norcoclaurine, Tinospora crispa), indacaterol (Arcapta), levalbuterol (Xopenex), metaproternol (Alupent), orciprenaline, olodaterol (Striverdi), pirbuterol (Maxair), terbutaline (Brethaire), vilanterol (Breo). The only exceptions are albuterol, formoterol, and salmeterol by a metered-dose inhaler when used -
Safety Evaluation of Certain Food Additives and Contaminants. WHO Food Additives Series, No
WHO FOOD Safety evaluation of ADDITIVES certain food additives SERIES: 64 and contaminants Prepared by the Seventy-third meeting of the Joint FAO/ WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) World Health Organization, Geneva, 2011 WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data Safety evaluation of certain food additives and contaminants / prepared by the seventy-third meeting of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA). (WHO food additives series ; 64) 1.Food additives - toxicity. 2.Food contamination. 3.Flavoring agents - analysis. 4.Flavoring agents - toxicity. 5.Risk assessment. I.Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. Meeting (73rd : 2010: Geneva, Switzerland). II.World Health Organization. III.Series. ISBN 978 924 166064 8 (NLM classification: WA 712) ISSN 0300-0923 © World Health Organization 2011 All rights reserved. Publications of the World Health Organization can be obtained from WHO Press, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland (tel.: +41 22 791 3264; fax: +41 22 791 4857; e-mail: [email protected]). Requests for permission to reproduce or translate WHO publications—whether for sale or for non- commercial distribution—should be addressed to WHO Press at the above address (fax: +41 22 791 4806; e-mail: [email protected]). The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. -
Pharmacogenomics of Endocrine Therapy in Breast Cancer
Journal of Human Genetics (2013) 58, 306–312 & 2013 The Japan Society of Human Genetics All rights reserved 1434-5161/13 OPEN www.nature.com/jhg REVIEW Pharmacogenomics of endocrine therapy in breast cancer James N Ingle The most important modality of treatment in the two-thirds of patients with an estrogen receptor (ER)-positive early breast cancer is endocrine therapy. In postmenopausal women, options include the selective ER modulators (SERMs), tamoxifen and raloxifene, and the ‘third-generation’ aromatase inhibitors (AIs), anastrozole, exemestane and letrozole. Under the auspices of the National Institutes of Health Global Alliance for Pharmacogenomics, Japan, the Mayo Clinic Pharmacogenomics Research Network Center and the RIKEN Center for Genomic Medicine have worked collaboratively to perform genome-wide association studies (GWAS) in women treated with both SERMs and AIs. On the basis of the results of the GWAS, scientists at the Mayo Clinic have proceeded with functional genomic laboratory studies. As will be seen in this review, this has led to new knowledge relating to endocrine biology that has provided a clear focus for further research to move toward truly personalized medicine for women with breast cancer. Journal of Human Genetics (2013) 58, 306–312; doi:10.1038/jhg.2013.35; published online 2 May 2013 Keywords: aromatase inhibitors; breast cancer; pharmacogenomics; tamoxifen INTRODUCTION trials were the double-blind, placebo-controlled NSABP P-1 trial of Breast cancer is the most common form of cancer in women both in tamoxifen8, and the double-blind NSABP P-2 trial that compared the United States1 and Japan.2 Endocrine therapy is the most raloxifene with tamoxifen.9,10 Combined, these two studies involved important modality in the two-thirds of patients with an estrogen over 33 000 women, which constituted about 59% of the world’s receptor (ER)-positive early breast cancer.