DOCSLIB.ORG

Cyber Bullying and Victimization: Psychosocial Characteristics of Bullies, Victims, and Bully/Victims

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cyber Bullying and Victimization: Psychosocial Characteristics of Bullies, Victims, and Bully/Victims University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2008 Cyber Bullying and Victimization: Psychosocial Characteristics of Bullies, Victims, and Bully/Victims Delia Carroll Campfield The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Campfield, Delia Carroll, "Cyber Bullying and Victimization: Psychosocial Characteristics of Bullies, Victims, and Bully/Victims" (2008). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 288. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/288 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CYBER BULLYING AND VICTIMIZATION: PSYCHOSOCIAL CHARACTERISTICS OF BULLIES, VICTIMS, AND BULLY/VICTIMS By Delia Carroll Campfield Master of Arts, The University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, 2006 Dissertation presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Psychology, Clinical The University of Montana Missoula, MT Official Graduation: Summer, 2008 Approved by: Dr. David A. Strobel, Dean Graduate School Dr. Christine Fiore, Chair Department of Psychology Dr. Greg Machek Department of Psychology Dr. Margaret Beebe-Frakenberger Department of Psychology Dr. Darrell Stolle Department of Curriculum and Instruction Dr. Danette Wollersheim Licensed Clinical Psychologist Campfield, Delia, Ph.D. Summer 2008 Clinical Psychology Cyber Bullying and Victimization: Psychosocial Characteristics of Bullies, Victims, and Bully/Victims Chairperson: Dr. Christine Fiore This study explored cyber bullying and victimization. The use of technology as a vehicle for peer victimization is increasing and is associated with a risk of psychosocial maladjustment (Finkelhor, et al., 2000; Wolak, et al., 2006; Ybarra & Mitchell, 2004a, 2004b). It is thought to peak during middle school (Harris & Petrie, 2002); thus, the sample included 6 th , 7 th , and 8 th graders who identified themselves as cyber bullies, victims, or bully/victims. Hypotheses were as follows: face-to-face bullies and victims would also be involved in cyber bullying and victimization, with females being more involved than males; cyber bullying and victimization would be associated with psychosocial maladjustment; externalizing behaviors would be more common among cyber bullies while internalizing symptoms, loneliness and low self-esteem would be more common among cyber victims; cyber bully/victims and individuals who were victims of both face-to-face bullying and cyber bullying would exhibit the poorest overall psychosocial adjustment. The study also sought to identify predictor variables related to cyber victimization, with loneliness and low self-esteem hypothesized as the most predictive. Analyses included chi-square tests of independence, a series of one-way ANOVAS and discriminant function analysis. Assessments included the Youth Self (Achenbach, 1991) (for internalizing, externalizing and total problems), the Children’s Loneliness Scale (Asher & Wheeler, 1985) for loneliness, and the Self-Esteem Questionnaire-Short Form (DuBois, et al., 1996) for peer and global self-esteem. Results indicated that 69% of participants were involved in cyber bullying and/or victimization. A significant overlap was found among face-to-face bullies and victims and cyber bullies and victims. Females were over-represented among cyber bullies, victims, and bully/victims. The psychosocial characteristics of cyber victims, and bully/victims included externalizing behaviors, total problems, and low peer self-esteem. Cyber bullies did not endorse any psychosocial symptoms of maladjustment. Cyber bully/victims and victims of both face-to-face and cyber bullying exhibited the poorest psychosocial adjustment. Externalizing behaviors and total problems were most predictive of cyber victim status. Increased awareness about the use of technology as a vehicle for bullying and identification of potential problems associated with cyber bullying and victimization will aid parents, educators, and psychologists in developing intervention and prevention strategies. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The completion of this dissertation was made possible by many individuals. I would like to extend my thanks to my dissertation committee members, Christine Fiore, Ph.D., Greg Machek, Ph.D., Margaret Beebe-Frankenberger, Ph.D., Darrell Stolle, Ph.D., and Danette Wollersheim, Ph.D. These remarkable people have provided me with their time, guidance, and constructive criticism. I would especially like to thank my committee chair person, Dr. Christine Fiore, for her unrelenting assistance with my dissertation as well as with numerous aspects of my professional training. Dr. Fiore has played an instrumental role in my professional and personal growth and I appreciate her contributions to my doctoral training. Finally, I would like to thank my family and friends for their unyielding support, friendship, and encouragement. I am especially grateful to my husband for his relentless patience, his constant faith in me, and his eternal emotional support throughout my education. iii Table of Contents Introduction ……………………………………………………………………………….1 Types of Bullying/Victimization……….………………………………………………....2 Face-to-face bullying/victimization……………………………………………….2 Relational bullying/victimization………………………………………………….3 Cyber bullying/victimization...................................................................................4 Prevalence/Incidence Rates of Bullying/Victimization.......................................................5 Face-to-face aggression……………...……………………………………………5 Relational aggression.……………………………………………………………..6 Cyber bullying/victimization.……………………………………………………..8 Psychosocial Characteristics/Adjustment.……………………………………………….16 Face-to-face bullying/victimization.……………………………………………..17 Perpetrators of face-to-face and relational aggression.…………………………. 18 Victims of face-to-face bullying.……………………………………………….. 20 Depression.………………………………………………………………………21 Anxiety.…………………………………………………………………………. 22 Loneliness………………………………………………………………………..23 Self-Esteem………………………………………………………………………24 Bully/Victims.……………………………………………………………………25 Cyber bullying/victimization.……………………………………………………26 Victims of cyber bullying.……………………………………………………… 26 Cyber bullies………………….…………………………………………………29 Cyber bully/victims……………………………………………………………...33 iv Hypotheses.………………………………………………………………………………38 Method…………………………………………………………………………………...39 Participants………………………………………………………………………………39 Setting……………………………………………………………………………………40 Measures…………………………………………………………………………………40 Demographic Questionnaire.………….................................................................40 Bullying/victimization Questionnaire.…………………………………………...41 Psychosocial adjustment variables.………………………………………………42 Procedure.………………………………………………………………………………..45 Data Analyses……………………………………………………………………………50 Results.………………………………………………………………………………….. 53 Participant demographics………………………………………………………...53 Internet use.………………………………………………………………………53 Bullying/victimization group status.……………………………………………..58 Group relationships…………………....................................................................65 Gender differences……………….………………………………………………69 Psychosocial characteristics…………………..…………………………………72 Comparison of cyber control to cyber bullies, victims, bully/victims……….…. 74 Comparison of cyber bully/victims to cyber bullies and victims………………..77 Comparison of face-to-face/cyber victims to face-to-face or cyber victims.........79 Predictors of cyber victim status..………………………………………………. 83 Discussion……..…………………………………………………………………………87 Frequency/types of cyber use………………….…………………………………87 v Parental awareness of use…….………………………………………………… 89 Risks of involvement……………………………………………….……………90 Frequency of cyber bullying/victimization………………………………………90 Frequency of face-to-face involvement………………………………………….94 Relationship between face-to-face and cyber bullying…...……………………...95 Relationship between face-to-face victims and cyber bullying…….……………95 Relationship between face-to-face bullies and cyber victims……………………96 Relationship between face-to-face and cyber victims..….………………………97 Gender differences in cyber bullying and victimization…….…………………..98 Psychosocial adjustment of cyber bullies and victims…….…………………...100 Psychosocial adjustment of cyber bully/victims……………………………….105 Clinical description of cyber bullies, victims, and bully/victims………………107 Psychosocial adjustment of face-to-face and cyber victims…….……………...109 Clinical description of face-to-face and cyber victims…….…………………...110 Psychosocial adjustment of cyber involvement once a week or more…………112 Clinical description of cyber bullies, victims, bully/victims once a week or more…………………………………………………………………………….113 Predictors of cyber victim status………………………………………………..119 Unique aspects of cyber bullying and victimization……………..….………….120 Unique characteristics of cyber bullies, victims, and bully/victims……………122 Implications…….………………………………………………………………………128 Limitations……………………………………………………………………………...133 References…….………………………………………………………………………...138 Appendix A: Internet Information Form………………………………………………..148 vi Appendix
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cyber Bullying and Victimization: Psychosocial Characteristics of Bullies, Victims, and Bully/ Victims Delia Carroll Campfield the University of Montana
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers Graduate School 2008 Cyber Bullying and Victimization: Psychosocial Characteristics of Bullies, Victims, and Bully/ Victims Delia Carroll Campfield The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Recommended Citation Campfield, Delia Carroll, "Cyber Bullying and Victimization: Psychosocial Characteristics of Bullies, Victims, and Bully/Victims" (2008). Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers. Paper 288. This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CYBER BULLYING AND VICTIMIZATION: PSYCHOSOCIAL CHARACTERISTICS OF BULLIES, VICTIMS, AND BULLY/VICTIMS By Delia Carroll Campfield Master of Arts, The University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, 2006 Dissertation presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Psychology, Clinical The University of Montana Missoula, MT Official Graduation: Summer, 2008 Approved by: Dr. David A. Strobel, Dean Graduate School Dr. Christine Fiore, Chair Department of Psychology Dr. Greg Machek Department of Psychology Dr. Margaret Beebe-Frakenberger Department of Psychology Dr. Darrell Stolle Department of Curriculum and Instruction Dr. Danette Wollersheim Licensed Clinical Psychologist Campfield, Delia, Ph.D. Summer 2008 Clinical Psychology Cyber Bullying and Victimization: Psychosocial Characteristics of Bullies, Victims, and Bully/Victims Chairperson: Dr. Christine Fiore This study explored cyber bullying and victimization. The use of technology as a vehicle for peer victimization is increasing and is associated with a risk of psychosocial maladjustment (Finkelhor, et al., 2000; Wolak, et al., 2006; Ybarra & Mitchell, 2004a, 2004b).
    [Show full text]
  • Crime Prevention Guide
    CRIME PREVENTION GUIDE MURDER & ASSAULT Most murder and assault victims know their attackers. Many times, the people involved in the incident are drunk or on drugs. Murder or assault can also be the result of another crime such as burglary or robbery. The victim is killed when he or she resists. Other murders or assaults happen because of some seemingly trivial confrontation that turns violent because of anger, irrational thinking, alcohol or drugs. • If you think you are in danger, go to a safe place, then call police. • Do not touch anything. • While waiting for police, you should write down the license plate numbers of any vehicles leaving the crime scene. • Make a note of any suspicious people you see in the area. • When police arrive, they will search for evidence and ask you to provide any information you may have. • If you have additional information after the officers leave, call the Criminal Investigation Division at (972) 625-1887. Investigating officers will ask victims and witnesses for details of the incident. Correct information is extremely important because it can help in making a speedy arrest and determine what charges should be filed. When the initial investigation is completed, the officer will write a report and send it to the Criminal Investigation Division. The Division will review the case, contact the victim and witnesses, file charges if possible and do everything within reason to arrest the suspect. PREVENTION • Avoid high-crime areas when possible. • If you have to travel in dangerous areas, remain alert to your surroundings. Watch for strangers who may approach you without apparent reason.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyber Violence Against Women and Girls
    CYBER VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN AND GIRLS A WORLD-WIDE WAKE-UP CALL 2015 Photo credits:Shutterstock A REPORT BY THE UN BROADBAND COMMISSION FOR DIGITAL DEVELOPMENT WORKING GROUP ON BROADBAND AND GENDER CYBER VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN AND GIRLS: A WORLD-WIDE WAKE-UP CALL Acknowledgements This Report has been written collaboratively, drawing on insights and rich contributions from a range of Commissioners and Expert Members of the Working Group on Broadband and Gender. It has been researched and compiled by lead author Nidhi Tandon, assisted by Shannon Pritchard, with editorial inputs by teams from UN Women, UNDP and ITU. Design concepts were developed by Céline Desthomas of ITU. We wish to thank the following people for their contributions and kind review and comments (listed in alphabetical order of institution, followed by alphabetical order of surname): Dafne Sabanes Plou, Jac sm Kee and Chat Garcia Ramilo (APC); Dr Nancy Hafkin; Minerva Novero- Belec (UNDP); Corat Suniye Gulser (UNESCO); Jennifer Breslin and team (UN Women); Samia Melhem and team (World Bank). About the Commission The Broadband Commission for Digital Development was launched by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) and the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) in response to UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon’s call to step up efforts to meet the Millennium Development Goals. Established in May 2010, the Commission unites top industry executives with government leaders, thought leaders and policy pioneers and international agencies and organizations concerned with development. The Broadband Commission embraces a range of different perspectives in a multi-stakeholder approach to promoting the roll-out of broadband, as well as providing a fresh approach to UN and business engagement.
    [Show full text]
  • Session 4 Personal Safety: Handling Taunting
    Session 4 Personal Safety: Handling taunting/ bullying Rationale Children are often taunted and bullied by their peers, older children and at times by adults. They have a few ways of handling such incidents, ranging from retaliation, complaining to someone in authority, ignoring the taunts and at times, internalizing the damaging message. This can reduce a child’s self- esteem. We need to help children understand that words, like the deeds of a person, describe and tell others about the character and personality of the person doing the taunting. Materials required - Marker pen - Any sticking substance (Blu Tac / double sided sticking tape / cello tape / board pins) - Session 4- worksheets Objectives of session 4 To impart and help children internalize the following messages: Core message 1: The way a person talks and acts tells us about the character of that person. Core Message 2: My qualities and abilities are more important what people say about my looks. Core Message 3: We can help each other be safe Core message 4: It is okay to discuss embarrassing feelings with people who care for me. Core message 1: The way person talks and acts tells us about Material Required the character of that person. Marker pen, Blu Tac / Board pins / Double sided sticking tape / Cello tape Tell a story: Marker pen, Chalk, Duster, Blackboard Ashtavakra’s body was bent in eight places and hence he came to be known as ‘Ashtavakra’. His grandfather Uddalaka took up Tips for Trainers the responsibility of his education. Ashtavakra was brilliant and by the time he was 11 years old, he was a complete scholar.
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 Hate Crime Survey
    2008 Hate Crime Survey About Human Rights First HRF’s Fighting Discrimination Program Human Rights First believes that building respect for human The Fighting Discrimination Program has been working since rights and the rule of law will help ensure the dignity to which 2002 to reverse the rising tide of antisemitic, racist, anti- every individual is entitled and will stem tyranny, extremism, Muslim, anti-immigrant, and homophobic violence and other intolerance, and violence. bias crime in Europe, the Russian Federation, and North America. We report on the reality of violence driven by Human Rights First protects people at risk: refugees who flee discrimination, and work to strengthen the response of persecution, victims of crimes against humanity or other mass governments to combat this violence. We advance concrete, human rights violations, victims of discrimination, those whose practical recommendations to improve hate crimes legislation rights are eroded in the name of national security, and human and its implementation, monitoring and public reporting, the rights advocates who are targeted for defending the rights of training of police and prosecutors, the work of official anti- others. These groups are often the first victims of societal discrimination bodies, and the capacity of civil society instability and breakdown; their treatment is a harbinger of organizations and international institutions to combat violent wider-scale repression. Human Rights First works to prevent hate crimes. For more information on the program, visit violations against these groups and to seek justice and www.humanrightsfirst.org/discrimination or email accountability for violations against them. [email protected]. Human Rights First is practical and effective.
    [Show full text]
  • Masculinity of Men Communicating Abuse Victimization
    Male Victimization 1 Running Head: MALE VICTIMIZATION Masculinity of Men Communicating Abuse Victimization Jessica J. Eckstein1, Ph.D. May 5th, 2010 Assistant Professor, Communication Department Western Connecticut State University 1 This paper is “in press” in the journal of Culture, Society, and Masculinities. The manuscript is based on an earlier version of the paper, “Constructing Gendered Victimization: Examining the Narratives of Men Experiencing Violence from Female Partners,” presented at the 2007 annual conference of National Communication Association, Chicago, IL. Male Victimization 2 Abstract This study explored, through in-depth interviews, the experiences of men sexually, psychologically, and/or physically victimized by female romantic partners. Men‟s narratives were analyzed to determine how masculinity and construction of victim-identities were related. Results show that abused men construed victimization as precipitated internally through self- blame and externally via societal-blame. Gendered masculinity was demonstrated for most men in the form of hegemonic-striving via complicit rationalizations; however, a minority of men constructed victimization in terms of protest masculinity. KEY WORDS: Masculinity, Hegemony, Intimate partner violence, Men, Victimization Male Victimization 3 Masculinity of Men Communicating Abuse Victimization Each year, 3.2 million men in the United States are victims of intimate partner violence (IPV) (Tjaden & Thoennes, 2000). Male IPV victimization, while not as common as female victimization, is a serious problem with its own set of identity issues for male victims. Unfortunately, men‟s victimization from female partners receives comparatively limited scholarly attention (George, 2003). The goal of this study was to explore, through in-depth interviews, male IPV victims‟ communication of gender identities.
    [Show full text]
  • Workplace Bullying Made Simple Employee Quiz
    Workplace Bullying Prevention Made Simple Facilitator’s Guide © TrainingABC 2011 Getting Started: Workplace bullying has been around for generations, however only just recently has the cost of this unfortunate tradition been quantified. Some experts estimate the cost of downtime and employee turnover as a result of bullying to run into the billions. In fact, most studies show that 50% of employees have either witnessed or been a victim of bullying at work. Workplace bullying of any type is truly unacceptable. Psychologists have compared the effects of bullying on victims as similar to post-traumatic stress disorder. The stress of bullying manifests into real physical and mental health issues. It destroys creativity by robbing some of the brightest employees of a voice in the organization. It increases employee turnover - bullied employees are three times more likely to leave a job than non-bullied employees. Lastly, it spreads like wildfire through organizations - destroying them from within. Bullying is like a virus – it spreads exponentially when it’s allowed to flourish. Stress the seriousness! The participants will key off you and decide if the organization is serious about stopping bullying. Put the participants at ease. Stress the seriousness of the topic. Be firm and don’t laugh or smile at jokes. Participants will key off of you! The Effects of Workplace Bullying Employee turnover Lost productivity Low company-wide morale Destroys creativity Cost to employee health Destroys organizational reputation Question: Ask the participant’s to list some of the effects of workplace bullying. What is Workplace Bullying? Bullying is hostile, aggressive or unreasonable behavior perpetrated against a co-worker.
    [Show full text]
  • OCSA Bullying/Cyberbullying/Hate Violence Policy
    OCSA BULLYING/CYBER BULLYING/HATE VIOLENCE POLICY All students and employees of the Orange County School of the Arts have the right to work, to attend school, and to participate in the educational process in a safe environment that is free from bullying and hate-motivated behavior. Every effort shall be made to promote mutual respect among students and staff and between and among students to encourage safe and harmonious relations that support human dignity and equality. The OCSA Board of Trustees recognizes the harmful effects of bullying on student learning and school attendance and desires to provide safe school environments that protect students from physical and emotional harm. School employees shall establish student safety as a high priority and shall not tolerate bullying of any student. No student or group of students shall, through physical, written, verbal, or other means, harass, sexually harass, threaten, intimidate, cyberbully, cause bodily injury to, or commit hate violence against any other student or school personnel. Students who have been bullied or cyberbullied shall promptly report such incidents to any staff member. Behavior or statements that degrade, intimidate, and/or harm an individual on the basis of his/her race, ethnicity, culture, heritage, immigration status, gender, sexual orientation, physical/mental attributes, religious beliefs or practices shall not be tolerated. Bullying in any form or platform, repeatedly picking fights with, or repeatedly taunting another person shall not be tolerated. This policy applies to all OCSA students and employees. This policy applies to all acts related to school activity or school attendance occurring within a school under the jurisdiction of the Executive Director of the Orange County School of the Arts.
    [Show full text]
  • The Challenges of Cyberbullying
    NEW ENCOUNTERS? THE CHALLENGES OF CYBERBULLYING Professor Shauna Van Praagh & Alyssa Wiseman November 17, 2015 What is Cyberbullying? "A person is bullied when he or she is exposed, repeatedly and over time, to negative actions on the part of one or more other persons, and he or she has difficulty defending himself or herself." - Dan Olweus (1993 and before) -An Act to prevent and stop bullying and violence in schools, 2012 Definition is fairly consistent worldwide—entails three criteria: (1) Verbal or physical aggression; (2) That is repeated over time; and (3) That involves a power differential. “Sticks and Stones” “I couldn’t write about online bullying without writing about face-to-face bullying too because Facebook and other social networking sites aren’t a discrete, walled off universe.” (39) - Emily Bazelon, “Sticks and Stones: Defeating the Culture of Bullying and Rediscovering the Power of Character and Empathy Despite wide media attention, cyberbullying is not necessarily more widespread than face-to-face bullying. Still, cyberbullying presents new concerns... “Sticks and Stones” New concerns include: (1) The Internet makes bullying harder to escape; (2) The Internet allows the perpetrator to bully without having to confront his or her victim; (3) The number of potential witnesses can be exponentially higher; and (4) There is the possibility that comments and images/ videos can go viral. Also, with undefined boundaries, whose responsibility is it to prevent or “deal” with cyberbullying? “It’s Complicated” danah boyd brings to light problematic tendencies and reactions: (1) Scapegoating technology: easier to focus on what is tangible rather than broader systemic issues at play; (2) Parental nostalgia: we idealize our childhoods and forget the problem we faced when we were young; (3) “Digital natives”: draws away attention from the problems children face in the digital era In creating these divides, different stakeholders may absolve themselves of responsibility.
    [Show full text]
  • Joking, Teasing Or Bullying? • a Kid Who Isn’T Very Nice to You Trips You in the Hall for the Third Time This Week
    LESSON 2 It Takes One Unit Joking, Teasing Grade 2 • Ages 7-8 TIME FRAME or Bullying? Preparation: 15 minutes Instruction: 30-60 minutes Students will distinguish the difference MATERIALS between joking, teasing and bullying and Large white poster sheet divided understand how joking, teasing and bullying into three columns with the following headings: Joking, Teasing, Bullying can strengthen or weaken relationships. Create three signs, one that says “JOKING”, another that Lesson Background for Teachers says, “TEASING”, third that says “BULLYING”; post on different walls This lesson builds on previous lessons in this unit. before class For more information on bullying visit PrevNet, an anti-bullying organization that RAK journals provides research, information and resources. www.prevnet.ca Kindness Concept Posters for Assertiveness, Respect Key Terms for Students LEARNING STANDARDS Consider writing key terms on the board before class to introduce vocabulary and increase understanding. Common Core: CCSS.ELA-Literacy. SL.2.1, 1a-c, 2, 3 Colorado: Compre- JOKING To say funny things or play tricks on people to make them hensive Health S.4, GLE.3, EO.a-c; laugh. Joking is between friends, makes all people laugh, Reading, Writing and Communicating isn’t meant to be mean, cruel or unkind, doesn’t make S.1, GLE.1, EO.b-f; S.1, GLE.2, EO.a-c people feel bad and stops before someone gets upset. Learning standards key TEASING Teasing doesn’t happen often. It means to make fun of someone by playfully saying unkind and hurtful things to the person; it can be friendly, but can turn unkind quickly.
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Abuse, Violence and Harassment Policy
    Policy No: HR-023 Group: HR Approved By: Board Executive Date: Oct. 13, 2015 OUR LADY SEAT OF WISDOM Ratified By: Board of Directors Date: Nov. 6, 2015 Amended By: Board of Directors Date: Feb. 6, 2016 Policy Title: Anti-Abuse, Violence and Harassment Policy Intent Our Lady Seat of Wisdom (OLSW) is committed to building and preserving a safe, productive and healthy environment for its students, employees, volunteers, visitors and contractors, based on mutual respect. In pursuit of this goal OLSW does not condone and will not tolerate any form of physical, sexual, emotional, verbal, or psychological abuse, neglect, violence or harassment/bullying against or by any OLSW employee, student, volunteer, visitor or contractor. Our Anti-Abuse, Violence and Harassment Policy is not intended to stop free speech or to interfere with everyday interactions. However, what one person finds offensive, others may not. Usually, abuse and harassment can be distinguished from normal, mutually acceptable socializing. It is important to remember that the perception of the receiver of the potentially offensive message be it spoken, a gesture, a picture or some other form of communication which may be deemed objectionable or unwelcome is of crucial importance. Nonetheless OLSW acknowledges that situations arise in which there is a perceived conflict between academic freedom and human rights. A violation of either freedom is of grave concern to the institution. With respect to the interplay of human rights protection and the practice of academic freedom, it is the position of OLSW that the responsible discussion of controversial issues in or out of the classroom is not a violation of this Policy.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is a Hate Incident? a Hate Incident Is Any Incident (Which May
    What is a Hate Incident? A Hate incident is any incident (which may or may not be a crime) that the victim or any other person perceives to be motivated by hostility or prejudice based on one of the following things: disability race religion transgender identity sexual orientation. All police forces record hate incidents based on these five personal characteristics. What type of incidents can be a hate incident? Hate incidents can take many forms. Here are some examples of hate incidents: verbal abuse like name-calling and offensive jokes harassment bullying or intimidation by children, adults, neighbours or strangers physical attacks such as hitting, punching, pushing, spitting threats of violence hoax calls, abusive phone or text messages, hate mail online abuse for example on Facebook or Twitter displaying or circulating discriminatory literature or posters harm or damage to things such as your home, pet, vehicle graffiti arson throwing rubbish into a garden malicious complaints for example over parking, smells or noise. When is a hate incident also a hate crime? When hate incidents become criminal offences they are known as hate crimes. A criminal offence is something which breaks the law of the land. Any criminal offence can be a hate crime if it was carried out because of hostility or prejudice based on disability, race, religion, transgender identity or sexual orientation. What can you do about a hate incident or crime? If you’ve experienced or witnessed a hate incident or crime you can report it to the police. When reporting the incident or crime you should say whether you think it was because of disability, race, religion, transgender identity, sexual orientation or a combination of these things.
    [Show full text]