Washington County, Kentucky
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Report on the Condition of the Salt River Watershed, Kentucky, Floyds Fork and the Minor Ohio River Tributaries in the Area November 1998 Upper Salt River
State of the River A report on the condition of the Salt River watershed, Kentucky, Floyds Fork and the minor Ohio River tributaries in the area November 1998 Upper Salt River Lower Salt River INSIDE wThe Salt River Watershed and minor Ohio River tributaries wWhat is the water quality? wWhat are the Rolling Fork primary concerns? wWhat can be done? What is a watershed? Streams No matter where you live, work, or play, you are in a Streams relatively little impact on the waters within the watershed. watershed. A watershed is a geographic area where all water However, a poorly managed forest that is harvested for lumber running off the land drains to a specific location. This location may impact the watershed through soil erosion from logging Divide Minor Drainage divide may be a stream, river, lake, wetland, or ocean; or the water Watershed for larger roads. may drain underground into the groundwater. You may live on Watershed a creek, which is considered a small watershed. Your creek may Residential land includes small communities and suburban areas join a river, which is a larger watershed. The river may have many of homes. Land disturbance during construction as well as land smaller creeks, known as tributaries, that drain into it and each of changes affect the hydrology of streams. Many homes depend these tributaries has a small watershed associated with it, and each on septic tanks which are sources of bacteria, pathogens, and is part of the larger watershed of the river. nutrients. Chemicals applied to lawns, trees and shrubs by homeowners, such as fertilizers, insecticides, and herbicides, are Groundwater carried off by stormwater and may harm the quality of the water in How does land use affect the watershed? (Aquifer) the creeks or harm the animals and plants in the creek. -
Nelson County's Third Post Office to Be Established Still Serves the Sixth Class City of Fairfield, on Ky 48, Half a Mile Fran The
I / / : :, THE POST OFFICES OF NELSON O'.XJNTY I \, Nelson, Kentucky ' s fourth county in order of fonnation, was organized by the Virginia legislature on November 29, 1784 and named for Thanas Nelson (1738-1789) , an ex-Virginia governor and signer of the Declaration of Independence. At the outset, the county canprised all of the original Jefferson County between the Salt, Green, and Ohio Rivers west of the eastern boundary of what became Washinton County. From Nelson' s original territory part or all of nineteen other counties were taken. Its present bol.Il'ldaries were assumed on January 15, 1824 with the establishment of Spencer County. 'Ihe act creating the county also designated its seat, Bardstown (then also spelled, variously, Bairdstown and Beardstown) , thirty two air miles sse of downtown Louisville. The county' s 424 square mil es are drained by the main stream and branches of the Roll ing Fork of Salt River which fonr15 its western border with Hardin and LaRue Counties. The Beech Fork River, with its principal tributary, Chaplin River, fonr15 Nelson' s northeast and eastern boundary with Washington County. Beech Fork then extends west through the central part of the county to join the Rolling Fork just southwest of Boston. Nelsonstopography varies fran the fairly level terrain around the centrally located Bardstown to the rolling hills of the east and the knobs in the west and south. -.:2.- The county's first pennanent settlements were made in 1780 by parties led by Col. Isaac Cox and James Rogers which were joined the following year by a group of Pennsylvanians under Samuel Pottinger. -
Camp Ground Lake, Salt River Basin, Kentucky
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT CAMP GROUND LAKE SALT RIVER BASIN, KENTUCKY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY WASHINGTON, D. C. 20314 SEPTEMBER 1972 SUMMARY CAMP GROUND LAKE SALT RIVER BASIN, KENTUCKY ( ) Draft (X) Final Environmental Statement Responsible Office: U. S. Army Engineer District, Louisville, Kentucky Name of Action: ( ) Administrative (X) Legislative 2* Description of Action: The reconmended plan of Improvement consists of construction of a multipurpose reservoir project consisting of a dam and appurtenances 49.1 miles upstream from the mouth of Beech Fork with resulting impoundment, lands and facilities located in Washington, Nelson, and Anderson Counties, Kentucky; project purposes include flood control, water supply, water quality control, general and fish and wildlife recreation, and redevelop ment. 3* a * Environmental Impacts: Provide flood damage reduction to downstream lands and improvements; provide water quality control, provide water supply; provide recreation area; accelerate downstream development; and Improve fishery. b. Adverse Environmental Impacts: Remove approximately 18,550 acres from private ownership; at seasonal pool elevation, approximately 5,070 acres of land and 50 miles of free-flowing stream will be inundated, with associated loss of natural terrestrial and stream habitat; two covered bridges will require removal. 4. Alternatives: Flood plain zoning, evacuation, improved flood forecasting, flood insurance, acquisition of flood prone lands, levees, channel improvement, other impoundments, and "no development." 5. Comments Received: Department of the Interior Department of Agriculture Department of Transportation Department of Health, Education and Welfare Environmental Protection Agency The Comnonwealth of Kentucky 6. Draft statement to CEQ 8 June 1972 Final statement to CEQ 6 UU1 ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT FOR CAMP GROUND LAKE SALT RIVER BASIN, KENTUCKY 1. -
401 KAR 10:026 Designation of Uses of Surface Waters (PDF)
Presented below are water quality standards that are in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. EPA is posting these standards as a convenience to users and has made a reasonable effort to assure their accuracy. Additionally, EPA has made a reasonable effort to identify parts of the standards that are not approved, disapproved, or are otherwise not in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. 401 KAR 10:026. Designation of uses of surface waters. RELATES TO: KRS 146.200-146.360, 146.410-146.535, 146.550-146.570, 146.600-146.619, 146.990, 224.01-010, 224.01- 400, 224.16-050, 224.16-070, 224.70-100-224.70-140, 224.71-100- 224.71-145, 224.73-100 -224.73-120 STATUTORY AUTHORITY: KRS 146.220, 146.241, 146.270, 146.410, 146.450, 146.460, 146.465, 224.10-100, 224.16-050, 224.16-060, 224.70-100, 224.70-110, 40 C.F.R. Part 131, 16 U.S.C. 1271-1287, 1531-1544, 33 U.S.C. 1311, 1313, 1314, 1316, 1341 NECESSITY, FUNCTION, AND CONFORMITY: KRS 224.10- 100 requires the cabinet to develop and conduct a comprehensive program for the management of water resources and to provide for the prevention, abatement, and control of pollution. This administra- tive regulation and 401 KAR 10:001, 10:029, 10:030, and 10:031 establish procedures to protect the surface waters of the Common- wealth, and thus protect water resources. This administrative regula- tion applies the designated uses described in 401 KAR 10:031 to the surface waters of the Commonwealth. -
Assessment of the Water Quality In
University of Kentucky UKnowledge KWRRI Research Reports Kentucky Water Resources Research Institute 10-1977 Assessment of the Water Quality in the Salt River Prior to Its Impoundment in Anderson and Spencer Counties, Kentucky Digital Object Identifier: https://doi.org/10.13023/kwrri.rr.106 Andrew C. Miller University of Kentucky Louis A. Krumholz University of Kentucky Stuart E. Neff University of Kentucky Darly E. Jennings University of Kentucky Patricia B. Olmes University of Kentucky See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/kwrri_reports Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits oy u. Part of the Water Resource Management Commons Repository Citation Miller, Andrew C.; Krumholz, Louis A.; Neff, Stuart E.; Jennings, Darly E.; Olmes, Patricia B.; and White, David S., "Assessment of the Water Quality in the Salt River Prior to Its Impoundment in Anderson and Spencer Counties, Kentucky" (1977). KWRRI Research Reports. 95. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/kwrri_reports/95 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Kentucky Water Resources Research Institute at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in KWRRI Research Reports by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors Andrew C. Miller, Louis A. Krumholz, Stuart E. Neff, Darly E. Jennings, Patricia B. Olmes, and David S. White This report is available at UKnowledge: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/kwrri_reports/95 Research Report No. 106 ASSESSMENT OF THE WATER QUALITY IN THE SALT RIVER PRIOR TO ITS IMPOUNDMENT IN ANDERSON AND SPENCER COUNTIES, KENTUCKY by Andrew C. -
The Filson Club History Quarterly
THE FILSON CLUB HISTORY QUARTERLY Vol. 27 LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY, JANUARy, 1953 No. 1 GOODIN'S FORT •1780) IN NELSON COUNTY, KENTUCKY BY EVELYN CRADY ADAMS PART ONE: STORY OF THE FORT Verdant meadows, rippling streams, and forested hills in the far western reaches of the Colony of Virginia greeted Samuel Goodin and his family and warmed their hearts as they disembarked from • their flatboats at the Falls of the Ohio (Louisville, Kentucky) in April, 1779.1 The unpleasant memories of the severe winter just passed in Fayette County, Pennsylvania,2 grew dim in enchantment of the vernal scene and there was the comforting assurance that the long- sought goal of homesteads would soon be happily realized. Within a short time the family's land entries totaled nearly four thousand acres." On portions of these tracts and of others, homes were built and offspring nurtured. Over the years descendants have held immutable the pioneering spirit and perpetuated it with a new sense of responsibility in worth-while fields of human endeavor. After lingering briefly at the Falls, Samuel Goodin proceeded about fifty miles to the south to the section lying along Pottenger's Creek. When the good points of the vast wilderness bad been carefully weighed, he retraced his route some six miles and selected the site for his fort on the north bank of the Rolling Fork of Salt River, midway between the future towns of Nelsonville and New Haven in Nelson County, Kentucky.4 Prospects pleased. The advantages of the remote site were at once obvious to the woodsmen-settlers. -
Chapter 2: Base Study
Chapter 2 Base Study Chapter 2: Base Study Long-range planning must be based on accurate, comprehensive, and reliable data about the community and its residents. Analysis of long-term trends can be helpful in forecasting the community’s future needs and requirements. This Base Study provides an analysis of the community’s existing land uses, natural and environmental conditions, population and economy to anticipate future growth and development over the next 25 years. The results of these analyses is the determination of the amount of residential, commercial, and industrial land required to accommodate growth and the basis for future land use plans and policies. Existing Land Use Analysis An important element of land use planning is an analysis of a community’s existing land use. An existing land use analysis involves a detailed evaluation of the community’s character, specifically existing land uses, vacant and underdeveloped land, physical conditions and constraints, and availability of public infrastructure and services. This analysis results in the determination of the land capacity and services available and needed to meet the future growth and development. Nelson County has approximately 279,780 acres, or 437.2 square miles. Given this substantial land area, a property-by-property evaluation of existing land uses was not feasible during the existing land use analysis for the 1996 Comprehensive Plan. The existing land use analysis focused on identifying and evaluating Community Character Areas, or areas representing distinct geographic areas with similar characteristics, development issues, and planning concerns. The existing land use analysis of the 1996 plan identified 8 Community Character Areas based on field surveys of existing development, community input and experience, and analysis of natural features. -
401 KAR 10:026 Designation of Uses of Surface Waters
Presented below are water quality standards that are in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. EPA is posting these standards as a convenience to users and has made a reasonable effort to assure their accuracy. Additionally, EPA has made a reasonable effort to identify parts of the standards that are not approved, disapproved, or are otherwise not in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. 401 KAR 10:026. Designation of uses of surface waters. RELATES TO: KRS 146.200 through 146.360, 146.410 through 146.535, 146.550 through 146.570, 146.600 through 146.619, 146.990, 224.1-010, 224.1-400, 224.16-050, 224.16-070, 224.70-100 through 224.70-140, 224.71-100 through 224.71-145, 224.73-100 through 224.73- 120 STATUTORY AUTHORITY: KRS 146.220, 146.241, 146.270, 146.410, 146.450, 146.460, 146.465, 224.10-100, 224.16-050, 224.16-060, 224.70-100, 224.70-110, 40 C.F.R. Part 131, 16 U.S.C. 1271 through 1287, 1531 through 1544, 33 U.S.C. 1311, 1313, 1314, 1316, 1341 NECESSITY, FUNCTION, AND CONFORMITY: KRS 224.10-100 requires the cabinet to develop and conduct a comprehensive program for the management of water resources and to provide for the prevention, abatement, and control of pollution. This administrative regulation and 401 KAR 10:001, 10:029, 10:030, and 10:031 establish procedures to protect the surface waters of the Commonwealth, and thus protect water resources. This administrative regulation applies the designated uses described in 401 KAR 10:031 to the surface waters of the Com- monwealth.