DOCSLIB.ORG

2016 Offshore Wind Technologies Market Report This Report Is Being Disseminated by the U.S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2016 Offshore Wind Technologies Market Report This Report Is Being Disseminated by the U.S 2016 Offshore Wind Technologies Market Report This report is being disseminated by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). As such, this document was prepared in compliance with Section 515 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act for fiscal year 2001 (public law 106-554) and information quality guidelines issued by DOE. Though this report does not constitute “influential” information, as that term is defined in DOE’s information quality guidelines or the Office of Management and Budget’s Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review, the study was reviewed both internally and externally prior to publication. For purposes of external review, the study benefited from the advice and comments of nine energy industry stakeholders, U.S. Government employees, and national laboratory staff. NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or any agency thereof. Available electronically at SciTech Connect http:/www.osti.gov/scitech Available for a processing fee to U.S. Department of Energy and its contractors, in paper, from: U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information P.O. Box 62 Oak Ridge, TN 37831-0062 OSTI http://www.osti.gov Phone: 865.576.8401 Fax: 865.576.5728 Email: [email protected] Available for sale to the public, in paper, from: U.S. Department of Commerce National Technical Information Service 5301 Shawnee Road Alexandria, VA 22312 NTIS http://www.ntis.gov Phone: 800.553.6847 or 703.605.6000 Fax: 703.605.6900 Email: [email protected] i | 2016 Offshore Wind Technologies Market Report 2016 Offshore Wind Technologies Market Report Primary Authors Walter Musial, National Renewable Energy Laboratory Philipp Beiter, National Renewable Energy Laboratory Paul Schwabe, National Renewable Energy Laboratory Tian Tian, National Renewable Energy Laboratory Tyler Stehly, National Renewable Energy Laboratory Paul Spitsen, U.S. Department of Energy With Contributions From Amy Robertson, National Renewable Energy Laboratory Vahan Gevorgian, National Renewable Energy Laboratory Acknowledgments ..................................................................................................................................... iii Acronyms and Abbreviations ................................................................................................................... iv Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................... v 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Approach and Method ................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Report Structure ............................................................................................................................ 5 2 Overview of Global Offshore Wind Development ............................................................................. 6 2.1 Global Offshore Market ................................................................................................................ 6 2.2 Offshore Wind Market Projections ............................................................................................. 11 3 U.S. Offshore Wind Market Assessment .......................................................................................... 15 3.1 U.S. Offshore Wind Industry Overview ...................................................................................... 15 3.2 U.S. Offshore Wind Project Development Pipeline Assessment ................................................ 18 3.3 U.S. Offshore Wind Lease Area Assessment .............................................................................. 24 3.4 U.S. Offshore Wind Procurement and Offtake Policy Assessment ............................................ 29 3.5 DOE’s Advanced Technology Demonstration Projects Program ............................................... 32 3.6 Regional Analysis of U.S. Wind Developments ......................................................................... 33 4 Cost and Pricing Trends .................................................................................................................... 53 4.1 Pricing Trends ............................................................................................................................. 54 4.2 Capital Expenditures ................................................................................................................... 63 4.3 Operational Expenditures ............................................................................................................ 66 4.4 Performance ................................................................................................................................ 66 4.5 Financing Trends ......................................................................................................................... 68 5 Offshore Wind Technology Trends ................................................................................................... 70 5.1 Site Characteristics for Global Offshore Wind Projects .............................................................. 70 5.2 Offshore Wind Turbine Trends ................................................................................................... 71 5.3 Substructure Technology and Market Trends ............................................................................. 74 5.4 Electrical Infrastructure Technology and Market Trends ........................................................... 77 5.5 Vessel and Logistical Trends ...................................................................................................... 80 6 Floating Offshore Wind Trends ......................................................................................................... 82 6.1 Global Market Assessment .......................................................................................................... 82 6.2 Floating Offshore Wind Trends .................................................................................................. 83 References ................................................................................................................................................. 90 Appendix A. U.S. Offshore Wind Policy Types .................................................................................... 105 Appendix B. Floating Projects ............................................................................................................... 107 Existing Floating Offshore Wind Projects ......................................................................................... 107 Floating Wind Projects Under Development ..................................................................................... 111 Appendix C. Cape Wind Overview ........................................................................................................ 120 ii | 2016 Offshore Wind Technologies Market Report Acknowledgments This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under Contract No. DE-AC36- 08GO28308 with the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). Funding for the work was provided by the DOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Wind Energy Technologies Office. The authors would like to extend thanks to Patrick Gilman and Alana Duerr from the DOE Wind Energy Technologies Office for supporting this research. Thanks also to Jose Zayas, Dan Beals, Rich Tusing, Gary Norton, Liz Hartman, and Brian Pitts of the DOE Wind Energy Technologies Office for their support and strategic guidance. The authors would also like to thank the following NREL reviewers and contributors: Suzanne Tegen, Brian Smith, Paul Veers, Garrett Barter, and Eric Lantz. This report covers a wide range of industry projects, policies, and past reports that the authors have documented with extensive support from a diverse group of peer reviewers. These experts and stakeholders include Ryan Wiser (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory), Fara Courtney (Massachusetts Research Partnership), Elizabeth Treseder (DONG Energy), Knut Aanstad (Statoil), Jeff Kehne (Magellan Wind), Gilles Duchesne (SBM Offshore), Aaron Smith (Principle Power), Katherine Kollins (SE Wind Coalition), Tom Harries (Bloomberg New Energy Finance London), Doug Boren (Bureau of Ocean Energy Management [BOEM] Pacific), Necitas Sumait (BOEM Pacific), Cheri Hunter (Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement), Angel McCoy (BOEM), Troels Stybe Sorenson (DONG Energy), Val Stori (Clean Energy States Alliance), Gavin Smart (ORE Catapult-UK),
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Annual Disclosure Report
    ANNUAL DISCLOSURE REPORT of the LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY (FISCAL YEAR 2020) This Annual Disclosure Report does not constitute an offer to sell or solicitation of an offer to buy any securities. The information set forth herein has been furnished by the Authority and LIPA and includes information obtained from other sources, all of which are believed to be reliable. The information and expressions of opinion contained herein are subject to change without notice and nothing herein shall, under any circumstances, create any implication that there has been no change in the affairs of the Authority, LIPA, PSEG, PSEG Long Island, National Grid or Exelon since the date hereof. Such information and expressions of opinion are made for the purpose of providing information to prospective investors and are not to be used for any other purpose or relied on by any other party. This Annual Disclosure Report contains statements which, to the extent they are not recitations of historical fact, constitute “forward-looking statements.” In this respect, the words “estimate,” “project,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “intend,” “believe” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. A number of important factors affecting the Authority’s and LIPA’s business and financial results could cause actual results to differ materially from those stated in the forward-looking statements. References to website addresses presented herein are for informational purposes only and may be in the form of a hyperlink solely for the reader’s convenience. Unless specified otherwise, such websites and the information or links contained therein are not incorporated into, and are not part of, this Annual Disclosure Report.
    [Show full text]
  • Kansas Wind Energy Update House Energy & Utilities Committee Kimberly Svaty on Behalf of the Wind Coalition 23 January 2012
    KANSAS WIND ENERGY UPDATE HOUSE ENERGY & UTILITIES COMMITTEE KIMBERLY SVATY ON BEHALF OF THE WIND COALITION 23 JANUARY 2012 Operating Kansas Wind Projects •1272.4 MW total installed wind generation •10 operating wind projects •Equates to billions in capital investment and thousands of construction jobs and more than 100 permanent jobs •Kansas has the second best wind resource in the nation th •Ranked 14 in the nation in overall wind power production • Percent of Kansas Power by wind in 2010 – 7.1% th •Kansas ranked 5 in the US in 2010 for percentage of electricity delivered from wind • Operating Kansas Wind Projects Project County Developer Size Power Turbine Installed In-Service Name (MW) Offtaker Type Turbines Year (MW) Gray County Gray NextEra 112 MKEC Vestas 170 2001 KCP&L 660kW Elk River Butler Iberdola 150 Empire GE 1.5 100 2005 Spearville Ford enXco 100.4 KCP&L GE 1.5 67 2006 Spearville II 48 48 2010 Smoky Hills Lincoln/ TradeWind 100.8 Sunflower – 50 Vestas 56 2008 Phase I Ellsworth Energy KCBPU- 25 1.8 Midwest Energy – 24 Smoky Hills Lincoln/ TradeWind 150 Sunflower – 24 GE 99 2008 Phase II Ellsworth Energy Midwest – 24 1.5 IP&L – 15 Springfield -50 Meridian Cloud Horizon 204 Empire – 105 Vestas 67 2008 Way EDP Westar - 96 3.0 Flat Ridge Barber BP Wind 100 Westar Clipper 40 2009 Energy 2.5 Central Wichita RES 99 Westar Vestas 33 2009 Plains Americas 3.0 Greensburg Kiowa John Deere/ 12.5 Kansas Power Pool Suzlon 10 2010 Exelon 1.2 Caney River Elk TradeWind 200 Tennessee Valley Vestas 111 2011 Energy Authority (TVA) 1.8 Operating Kansas Wind Projects Gray County Wind Farm- Gray County, Kansas - Kansas' first commercial wind farm was erected near the town of Montezuma by FPL Energy (now NextEra Energy Resources) in 2001.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Offshore Wind Power Economic Impact Assessment
    U.S. Offshore Wind Power Economic Impact Assessment Issue Date | March 2020 Prepared By American Wind Energy Association Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Current Status of U.S. Offshore Wind .......................................................................................................................................................... 2 Lessons from Land-based Wind ...................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Announced Investments in Domestic Infrastructure ............................................................................................................................ 5 Methodology ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Input Assumptions ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Modeling Tool ........................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Empire Offshore Wind LLC Empire Wind 1 Project Article VII
    Empire Offshore Wind LLC Empire Wind 1 Project Article VII Application Pre-Filed Direct Testimony June 2021 PRE-FILED DIRECT TESTIMONY Pre-filed direct testimony in support of the Article VII Application for the Empire Wind 1 Project is presented by witnesses by subject area, as follows: Witness Exhibit(s) Sponsored Laura Morales Exhibit 1: General Information Regarding Application Laura Morales, Nathalie Schils Exhibit 2: Location of Facilities Laura Morales, Joel Stadell, Exhibit 3: Alternatives Sabrina Hepburn Laura Morales, Joel Stadell, Exhibit 4: Environmental Impact Sabrina Hepburn, Robert Jacoby, Katherine Miller, June Mire, Ryan Earley Joel Stadell Exhibit 5: Design Drawings Julia Bovey, Geir Miskov, Joel Exhibit 6: Economic Effects of Proposed Facility Stadell Laura Morales, Joel Stadell, Exhibit 7: Local Ordinances Sabrina Hepburn Laura Morales, Nathalie Schils Exhibit 8: Other Pending Filings Geir Miskov, Joel Stadell Exhibit 9: Cost of Proposed Facility Joel Stadell Exhibit E-1: Description of Proposed Transmission Facility Joel Stadell Exhibit E-2: Other Facilities Joel Stadell Exhibit E-3: Underground Construction Georges Charles, Joel Stadell Exhibit E-4: Engineering Justification Laura Morales, Sabrina Hepburn Exhibit E-5: Effect on Communications Laura Morales, Sabrina Hepburn, Exhibit E-6: Effect on Transportation Joel Stadell, Ryan Earley Laura Morales, Erin Lincoln Appendix B: Sediment Transport Analysis Empire Wind 1 Project Pre-Filed Direct Testimony Article VII Application Witness Exhibit(s) Sponsored Laura Morales, Katherine Miller Appendix C: Coastal Zone Management Consistency Statement Julia Bovey Appendix D: Public Involvement Plan Laura Morales, June Mire Appendix E: Benthic Resource Characterization Reports Benjamin R.T. Cotts and William Appendix F: Electric- and Magnetic-Field Assessment H.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Market Report
    US OFFSHORE WIND MARKET UPDATE & INSIGHTS US OFFSHORE WIND CAPACITY GENERATION The US Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Ocean and Energy Management (BOEM), has auctioned 16 US offshore wind energy areas (WEAs) designated in federal waters for offshore wind development. Each area has been leased to a qualified offshore wind developer. The ar- eas are located along the East Coast from North Carolina to Massachusetts and represent a total potential capacity of 21,000 Megawatts (MWs) of offshore wind power generation. HISTORY OF BOEM AUCTIONS AND LEASES YEAR LEASE # LESSEE STATE ACREAGE BID MW* NEXT 2012 0482 GSOE I DE 70,098 NA NA SAP *Reading volumes, some earlier estimates 2013 0486 Deepwater Wind NE RI/MA 97,498 $3,838,288 3400 TTL COP of capacity likely used 2013 0487 Deepwater Wind NE RI/MA 67,252 $3,838,288 3400 TTL FDR different calculations. 2013 0483 VA Electric & Power Co. VA 112,799 $1,600,000 2000 COP In all cases, capacity 2014 0490 US Wind MD 79,707 $8,701,098 1450 COP calculations should be considered estimates. 2015 0501 Vineyard Wind MA 166,886 $166,886 See Below FDR 2015 0500 Bay State Wind MA 187,523 $281,285 2000 TTL COP 2016 0498 Ocean Wind NJ 160,480 $880,715 See Below COP 2016 0499 EDFR Development NJ 183,353 $1,006,240 3400 TTL SAP 2017 0512 Equinor Wind US NY 79,350 $42,469,725 1000 COP 2017 0508 Avangrid Renewables NC 122,405 $9,066,650 1486 SAP 2018 0519 Skipjack Offshore Energy DE 26,332 Assigned NA SAP 2018 0520 Equinor Wind US MA 128,811 $135,000,000 1300 EXEC 2018 0521 Mayflower Wind Energy MA 127,388 $135,000,000 1300 EXEC 2018 0522 Vineyard Wind MA 132,370 $135,000,000 1500 EXEC EXEC—Lease Execution SAP—Site Assessment Plan COP—Construction & Operations Plan FDR—Facility Design Report @offshorewindus / BUSINESS NETWORK FOR OFFSHORE WIND / offshorewindus.org 1 STATE 2018 2019 MARKET GROWTH The US Offshore Wind market currently stands VIRGINIA 12 12 at 16,970 MWs and is a subset of the total US MARYLAND 366 366 potential generation capacity.
    [Show full text]
  • South Fork Wind Farm and South Fork Export Cable Project Biological Assessment for the National Marine Fisheries Service
    South Fork Wind Farm and South Fork Export Cable Project Biological Assessment January 2021 For the National Marine Fisheries Service U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Office of Renewable Energy Programs This page left blank intentionally. South Fork Wind Farm and South Fork Export Cable Project Biological Assessment for the National Marine Fisheries Service CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 1 Action Area ............................................................................................................................................ 2 Renewable Energy Process ..................................................................................................................... 4 Design Envelope ..................................................................................................................................... 7 Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultation History ....................................................................... 7 Proposed Action .......................................................................................................................................... 7 Construction ........................................................................................................................................... 8 South Fork Wind Farm ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Generation Forecasting Methods and Proliferation of Artificial Neural
    sustainability Review Wind Generation Forecasting Methods and Proliferation of Artificial Neural Network: A Review of Five Years Research Trend Muhammad Shahzad Nazir 1,* , Fahad Alturise 2 , Sami Alshmrany 3, Hafiz. M. J Nazir 4, Muhammad Bilal 5 , Ahmad N. Abdalla 6, P. Sanjeevikumar 7 and Ziad M. Ali 8,9 1 Faculty of Automation, Huaiyin Institute of Technology, Huai’an 223003, China 2 Computer Department, College of Science and Arts in Ar Rass, Qassim University, Ar Rass 51921, Saudi Arabia; [email protected] 3 Faculty of Computer and Information Systems, Islamic University of Madinah, Madinah 42351, Saudi Arabia; [email protected] 4 Institute of Advance Space Research Technology, School of Networking, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China; [email protected] 5 School of Life Science and Food Engineering, Huaiyin Institute of Technology, Huai’an 223003, China; [email protected] 6 Faculty of Information and Communication Engineering, Huaiyin Institute of Technology, Huai’an 223003, China; [email protected] 7 Department of Energy Technology, Aalborg University, 6700 Esbjerg, Denmark; [email protected] 8 College of Engineering at Wadi Addawaser, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Wadi Addawaser 11991, Saudi Arabia; [email protected] 9 Electrical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Aswan University, Aswan 81542, Egypt * Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected]; Tel.: +86-1322-271-7968 Received: 8 April 2020; Accepted: 23 April 2020; Published: 6 May 2020 Abstract: To sustain a clean environment by reducing fossil fuels-based energies and increasing the integration of renewable-based energy sources, i.e., wind and solar power, have become the national policy for many countries.
    [Show full text]
  • DOE/EA-1521; Environmental Assessment for Spring Canyon
    EA, Spring Canyon Wind Project ix TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 PURPOSE AND NEED......................................................................................................... 1 1.1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 1 1.2 PURPOSE AND NEED............................................................................................. 3 1.2.1 Federal Agency Action ............................................................................... 3 1.2.2 Applicant's Purpose and Need .................................................................... 3 1.3 SCOPING .................................................................................................................. 3 2.0 ALTERNATIVES INCLUDING THE PROPOSED ACTION ............................................ 5 2.1 WESTERN'S PROPOSED ACTION ........................................................................ 5 2.2 DESCRIPTION OF INVENERGY'S PROPOSED PROJECT................................. 5 2.2.1 Overview..................................................................................................... 5 2.2.2 Construction................................................................................................ 9 2.2.2.1 Road and Pad Construction.......................................................... 10 2.2.2.2 Foundations and Tower Erection................................................. 12 2.2.2.3 Trenching and Placement of Underground Electrical and Communications Cables ..............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Statement 2012 of Enel Green Power S.P.A
    Annual Report 2012 Annual Report 2012 Contents Report on operations Consolidated financial statements The Enel Green Power structure | 7 Consolidated Income Statement | 90 Corporate boards | 8 Statement of Consolidated Comprehensive Income | 91 Letter to the shareholders and other stakeholders | 10 Consolidated Balance Sheet | 92 Summary of results | 12 Statement of Changes in Consolidated Shareholders’ Equity | 93 Significant events in 2012 | 17 Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows | 94 The contribution of renewable energy to sustainability | 24 Notes to the financial statements | 95 Reference scenario | 28 > Enel Green Power and the financial markets | 28 Economic and energy conditions in 2012 | 30 Corporate governance > Economic developments | 30 > Developments in the main market indicators | 31 Corporate governance and ownership > International commodity prices | 32 structures report | 162 Electricity markets | 33 Overview of the Group’s performance and financial position | 52 Declaration of the Chief Executive Officer Performance and financial position by segment | 62 and the officer responsible for the preparation > Italy and Europe | 64 of corporate financial reports > Iberia and Latin America | 66 > North America | 68 Declaration of the Chief Executive Officer > Retail | 69 and the officer responsible for the preparation Main risks and uncertainties | 71 of corporate financial reports | 202 Outlook | 73 Innovation | 74 Human resources and organization | 77 Annexes Regulations governing non-EU subsidiaries | 83 Regulations governing
    [Show full text]
  • Enel Green Power: Is China an Attractive Market for Entry?
    Department of Business and Management Chair of M&A and Investment Banking ENEL GREEN POWER: IS CHINA AN ATTRACTIVE MARKET FOR ENTRY? SUPERVISOR Prof. Luigi De Vecchi CANDIDATE Mario D’Avino matr. 641711 CO – SUPERVISOR Prof. Simone Mori ACADEMIC YEAR 2012/13 “A chi mi ha trasmesso l’umiltà e la curiosità, sorgenti prime per la sete del sapere. A chi mi ha sempre smosso dagli allori, forgiandomi di una continua motivazione, perché il vincente è colui che non si ferma, ma imperterrito, già guarda oltre. A chi mi ha insegnato la costanza e la precisione, onniscienti linee guida nel raggiungimento di ogni traguardo. A chi mi ha mostrato la forza della tenacia, arma imprescindibile per lottare senza tregua e non mollare mai. Ed infine a colui che, onnipresente, accompagna ogni mio passo, senza far rumore.” 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………. 7 CHAPTER 1 - “AN OVERVIEW OF THE RENEWABLE SECTOR” 1.1. RENEWABLE ENERGY…………………………………………… 9 1.1.1. History……………………………………………………………….. 11 1.1.2. Wind Power………………………………………………………….. 12 1.1.3. Hydropower………………………………………………………….. 13 1.1.4. Solar Power…………………………………………………………... 14 1.1.5. Biomass Power………………………………………………………. 16 1.1.6. Geothermal Power…………………………………………………… 17 1.2. GLOBAL MARKET OVERVIEW………………………………….. 18 1.2.1. Power Sector…………………………………………………………. 20 CHAPTER 2 - “ANALYSIS OF THE HISTORICAL AND PLANNED INVESTMENTS IN THE RENEWABLE SECTOR” 2.1. HISTORICAL TREND……………………………………………… 26 2.1.1. Global Overview 2012……………………………………………….. 26 2.1.2. Investment Breakdown by Country………………………………….. 27 2.1.3. Investment Breakdown by Sector……………………………………. 30 2.1.4. Investment Breakdown by Type……………………………………... 32 2.1.5. Bank Finance………………………………………………………… 34 2.2. PLANNED INVESTMENT………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Statewide Air Emissions Calculations from Wind and Other Renewables
    ESL-TR-20-07-01 STATEWIDE AIR EMISSIONS CALCULATIONS FROM WIND AND OTHER RENEWABLES VOLUME I A Report to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality For the Period January 2019 – December 2019 Juan-Carlos Baltazar, Ph.D., P.E.; Jeff Haberl, Ph.D.; Bahman Yazdani, P.E.; David Claridge, Ph.D., P.E.; Sungkyun Jung; Farshad Kheiri; Chul Kim July 2020 Page 1 ENERGY SYSTEMS LABORATORY July 15, 2020 Mr. Robert Gifford Air Quality Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Austin, TX 78711-3087 Dear Mr. Gifford, The Energy Systems Laboratory (ESL) at the Texas Engineering Experiment Station of The Texas A&M University System is pleased to provide its annual report, “Statewide Emissions Calculations From Wind and Other Renewables,” as required by the 79th Legislature. This work has been performed through a contract with the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ). In this work, the ESL is required to obtain input from public/private stakeholders, and develop and use a methodology to annually report the energy savings from wind and other renewables. This report summarizes the work performed by the ESL on this project from January 2019 to December 2019. Please contact me at (979) 845-9213 should you have questions concerning this report or the work presently being done to quantify emissions reductions from renewable energy measures as a result of the TERP implementation. Sincerely, David E. Claridge, Ph.D., P.E. Director Enclosure . Page 2 Disclaimer This report is provided by the Texas Engineering Experiment Station (TEES) as required under Section 388.003 (e) of the Texas Health and Safety Code and is distributed for purposes of public information.
    [Show full text]
  • Deepwater Wind Plans Offshore Wind Farm to Serve Maryland
    Deepwater Wind Plans Offshore Wind Farm to Serve Maryland Skipjack Wind Farm Will Deliver Affordable Offshore Wind Energy Far Below State Estimates, Saving Ratepayers Millions of Dollars Ocean City, Md. – November 22, 2016 – America’s leading offshore wind company Deepwater Wind today announced plans for the Skipjack Wind Farm, a new offshore wind farm that will help Maryland meet its clean- energy goals at far lower prices than state law anticipates, saving Maryland ratepayers millions of dollars. The Skipjack Wind Farm will not only be the state’s largest renewable energy project, it would also be the right size for Maryland’s first offshore wind farm. At 120 megawatts, the Skipjack Wind Farm could be built in a single construction season, and developed more cost-effectively, and with considerably less risk, than a larger project. At more than 17 nautical miles northeast of Ocean City’s coastline, the project would be located so far away that it won’t impact views from Maryland’s shore. Deepwater Wind has secured the rights to acquire the site’s federal lease, subject to regulatory approval. “We’re bringing down the cost of American offshore wind energy in a big way,” said Deepwater Wind CEO Jeffrey Grybowski. “Ratepayers in Maryland will benefit from energy that is both clean and affordable. The Skipjack Wind Farm is the right clean energy solution for Maryland, and we’re ready to get to work.” The Skipjack Wind Farm is expected to generate well over $100 million dollars in economic benefits for Maryland. Deepwater Wind will make significant investments in the state of Maryland and employ hundreds of local workers during the project’s construction.
    [Show full text]