DOCSLIB.ORG

B-25 a Preliminary Report on the Drainage Reclamation in Georgia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

/·' l?OSTI ' I' I Ef'I-J PL.l'l'b' I GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF GEORGIA S. W. McCALLIE, State Geologist DRAINAGE INVESTIGATIONS OFFICE OF EXPERIMENT STATIONS, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE C. G. ELLIOTT, Chief of Drainage Investigations BULLETIN NO. 25 A PRELIMINARY REPORT ON DRAINAGE RECLAMATION IN GEORGIA The Drainage Situation in Georgia BY S. W. McCallie. State Geologist AND Drainage Examinations and Surveys in Georgia By U. S. Department of Agriculture THE ADVISORY BOARD OF THE Geological Survey of Georgia in the Year 1911 (Ex-Officio) His ExcELLENCY, JOSEPH M. BROWN, Governor of Georgia PRESIDENT oF THE BoARD HoN. PHILJP COOK ....................... Secretary of State RoN. J. P. BROWN .......................... State Treasurer RoN. W. A. WRIGHT ..................... Comptroller-General RoN. H. A. HALL .......................... Attorney-General RoN. T. G. HUDSON .............. Commissioner of Agriculture RoN. M. L. BRITTAIN .......... Commissioner of Public Schools LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL GEoLOGICAL SuRVEY oF GEORGIA, ATLANTA, June 15, 1911. To His Excellency, JosEPH M. BRowN, Governor, and President of the Advisory Board of the Geological Survey of Georgia. SIR: I have the honor to submit herewith a preliminary report on Drainage Reclamation in Georgia by this department and Drainage Examinations and Surveys in Georgia by the U. S. Department o£ Ag­ Ticulture, to be published as Bulletin No. 25 o£ this Survey. Very respectfully yours, S. W. McCALLIE, State Geologist. 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Advisory Board .........................................•....... 3 Letter of Transmittal ......................................... 5 List of Illustrations ........................................... 10 Drainage Conditions in Georgia . ....... 11-26 Swamp ·and overflow lands ................................... 11-26 Introductory ............................................... 11 Swamp lands ............................................. 11·12 Overflow lands ............................................ 12-13 Wet lands ................................................ 13 Salt marsh lands .......................................... 13-14 Investigation of drainage conditions by the State . ....... 14-24 Introductory ......................................... : . .... 14 Okefinokee Swamp survey .. : . ............................. 14-19 Survey of the Chickasawhatchee Creek swamp ............. 19-24 Federal Government ...................................•....... 24 How the State would be benefitted by the drainage of swamp and overflow lands .............................. 25-26 Drai:aage Examinations and Surveys in Georgia ................. 27-98 Foreword .................................................... 28·39 Bryan County, by J. V. Phillips ............................... 31-34 Location and description .................................... 30 Natural drainage channels and outlets ....................... 31 Typical area needing drainage .............................. 31-32 Drainage of the past ....................................... 32 Present farming conditions ................................. 32-33 Conclusion ................................................. 33 Chatham County, by J. V. Phillips ..................... · · · · · · · · 35-37 Location and description ............................ · · · · · .. 35 Present drainage conditions .......................... ·.······ 35-36 Opportunities ....................................... · · · · · · .. 36-37 Clinch and Echols Counties, drainage conditions of the Suwanoochee Creek Valley, by J. v. Phillips ............... 39-41 Location and description ................................... 39 Farming, crops and soils ........................ _. .......... 40 Transportation and roads ................................... 40 Need of drainage ........................................... 40-41 Glynn County, by F. G. Eason .......................... · . · · .. · . 43-47 Location and description ................................... 43 Natural drainage channels .................................. 43-44 Soil .... ········· .......................................... 44 7 Page Natural drainage conditions ................................ 44-45 Farming conditions and crops ............................. 45-46 Transportation facilities ..................................... 46 Drainage plan proposed .•................................... 46-47 Liberty County, by F. G. Eason ............................... 49-52 Location and description ................................... 49 Natural drainage channels .................................. 49-50 The drainage situation ..................................... 50-51 Transportation ............................................. 51 Conclusion ................................................. 51-52 Mcintosh County, by F. G. Eason ............................. 53-58 Location and drainage conditions ........................... 53-54 Natural drainage channels ........................... · ...... 54-55 Soil and farming conditions ................................. 55-56 Transportation ............................................. 56 Outlook for drainage ........................................ 57 Coast section of the county ................................. 57-58 Telfair County, by J. R. Haswell ..... ~ .................... · · · .. 59-69 Description ................................................ 59 Farming conditions ......................................... 60 Soil ................................................ · ...... 60-61 Watersheds ................................................ 62-63 Rainfall and run-off ........................................ 63-66 Proposed Improvements .............................. · ...... 66-68 Appendix-Bench marks .••••••.•.••••••••••••••..... · ...... 68-69 The proposed drainage improvement of McRae Branch, Telfair County, by J. R. Haswell ...................•....... 71-81 Introduction ............................................... 71 Geographical location and area ............................. 72 Natural drainage channels .................................. 72·73 Natural surface conditions .................................. 73 Crops and land values ...................................... 73-74 Soil ....................................................... 74 Description of survey ....................................... 74-75 Plan proposed for drainage Improvement ..................... 75-79 Beneficial results ........................................... 79-80 Estimate of cost ............................................ 80 Data for main ditch ........................................ 80 List of bench marks ••.••................................... 81 Drainage plan for the Berry School Farm, by L. L. Ridinger ........................................ The Berry School Farm .................................... 83-90 Introduction ............................................... 83 Drainage .................................................. 84 Surveys ................................................... 84-85 Plans for improvement ..................................... 85-86 8 ... Page Cost of the improvement ..........................•....... 86-87 General specifie~itions for constructing tile drains ...•...... 87-89 Digging the trenches ..................................... 87 Grading the bottom ..............................•....... 87 Laying the tile ........................................... 87-88 Blinding the tile ......................................... 88 The line method .......................................... 88-89 Catch basins or inlets ...................................... 89 Protection of outlets ........................................ 89 Estimate of cost. ........................................... 89-90 Bench marks ............................................... 90 1\he improvement of the Mulberry River, Jackson County, by L. L. Hidinger ........................................ 91-98 Location and description ................................... 91-92 The survey ................................................ 92-93 Results of the survey ...................................... 93-94 Plans and estimates ........................................ 94-97 Estimate of cost ............................................ 97 Recommendations .......................................... 97-98 Bench marks ............................................... 98 Proposed drainage law ....................................... 99-188 9 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS PLATES I. Cypress for~t in the Okefinokee Swamp. Frontispiece II. Fig. 1.-Cultivated "Second Bottoms," west side of Opp. Page Flint River, near Montezuma, Macon County. 24 Fig. 2.-Pyles Marsh, at low tide, eleven miles north- west of Brunswick, Glynn County . 24 III. Fig. 1.-Maudin Swamp, Bryan County. 32 Fig. 2.-Canoochee River, Bryan County. 32 IV. Fig. 1.-Cross Swamp, near Clyde, Bryan County. Typical of the gum swamps of this section as to size of trees ..................................... : . 36 Fig. 2.-Typical low-lying flat woods, near Clyde, Bryan 'County, s.howing the eft:ects of the forest fires which often follow in the wake of the timber and turpentine operations . 36 Fig. 1.-:Sridge over Gum · Swamp Creek, Telfair County, one mile northeast of McRae-Old bridge at right . 48 Fig. 2.-Gum Swamp Creek, near McRae, Telfair County, looking up stream from bridge on one of the four channels . 48 VI. Fig. 1.-Cultivated lands at edge of flat woods, McRae Branch, Telfair County-Branch at extreme right, Ocmulgee Valley in
Recommended publications
  • Stream-Temperature Characteristics in Georgia

    Stream-Temperature Characteristics in Georgia

    STREAM-TEMPERATURE CHARACTERISTICS IN GEORGIA By T.R. Dyar and S.J. Alhadeff ______________________________________________________________________________ U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 96-4203 Prepared in cooperation with GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION Atlanta, Georgia 1997 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services 3039 Amwiler Road, Suite 130 Denver Federal Center Peachtree Business Center Box 25286 Atlanta, GA 30360-2824 Denver, CO 80225-0286 CONTENTS Page Abstract . 1 Introduction . 1 Purpose and scope . 2 Previous investigations. 2 Station-identification system . 3 Stream-temperature data . 3 Long-term stream-temperature characteristics. 6 Natural stream-temperature characteristics . 7 Regression analysis . 7 Harmonic mean coefficient . 7 Amplitude coefficient. 10 Phase coefficient . 13 Statewide harmonic equation . 13 Examples of estimating natural stream-temperature characteristics . 15 Panther Creek . 15 West Armuchee Creek . 15 Alcovy River . 18 Altamaha River . 18 Summary of stream-temperature characteristics by river basin . 19 Savannah River basin . 19 Ogeechee River basin. 25 Altamaha River basin. 25 Satilla-St Marys River basins. 26 Suwannee-Ochlockonee River basins . 27 Chattahoochee River basin. 27 Flint River basin. 28 Coosa River basin. 29 Tennessee River basin . 31 Selected references. 31 Tabular data . 33 Graphs showing harmonic stream-temperature curves of observed data and statewide harmonic equation for selected stations, figures 14-211 . 51 iii ILLUSTRATIONS Page Figure 1. Map showing locations of 198 periodic and 22 daily stream-temperature stations, major river basins, and physiographic provinces in Georgia.
  • List of TMDL Implementation Plans with Tmdls Organized by Basin

    List of TMDL Implementation Plans with Tmdls Organized by Basin

    Latest 305(b)/303(d) List of Streams List of Stream Reaches With TMDLs and TMDL Implementation Plans - Updated June 2011 Total Maximum Daily Loadings TMDL TMDL PLAN DELIST BASIN NAME HUC10 REACH NAME LOCATION VIOLATIONS TMDL YEAR TMDL PLAN YEAR YEAR Altamaha 0307010601 Bullard Creek ~0.25 mi u/s Altamaha Road to Altamaha River Bio(sediment) TMDL 2007 09/30/2009 Altamaha 0307010601 Cobb Creek Oconee Creek to Altamaha River DO TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010601 Cobb Creek Oconee Creek to Altamaha River FC 2012 Altamaha 0307010601 Milligan Creek Uvalda to Altamaha River DO TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 2006 Altamaha 0307010601 Milligan Creek Uvalda to Altamaha River FC TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010601 Oconee Creek Headwaters to Cobb Creek DO TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010601 Oconee Creek Headwaters to Cobb Creek FC TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010602 Ten Mile Creek Little Ten Mile Creek to Altamaha River Bio F 2012 Altamaha 0307010602 Ten Mile Creek Little Ten Mile Creek to Altamaha River DO TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010603 Beards Creek Spring Branch to Altamaha River Bio F 2012 Altamaha 0307010603 Five Mile Creek Headwaters to Altamaha River Bio(sediment) TMDL 2007 09/30/2009 Altamaha 0307010603 Goose Creek U/S Rd. S1922(Walton Griffis Rd.) to Little Goose Creek FC TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010603 Mushmelon Creek Headwaters to Delbos Bay Bio F 2012 Altamaha 0307010604 Altamaha River Confluence of Oconee and Ocmulgee Rivers to ITT Rayonier
  • Rule 391-3-6-.03. Water Use Classifications and Water Quality Standards

    Rule 391-3-6-.03. Water Use Classifications and Water Quality Standards

    Presented below are water quality standards that are in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. EPA is posting these standards as a convenience to users and has made a reasonable effort to assure their accuracy. Additionally, EPA has made a reasonable effort to identify parts of the standards that are not approved, disapproved, or are otherwise not in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. Rule 391-3-6-.03. Water Use Classifications and Water Quality Standards ( 1) Purpose. The establishment of water quality standards. (2) W ate r Quality Enhancement: (a) The purposes and intent of the State in establishing Water Quality Standards are to provide enhancement of water quality and prevention of pollution; to protect the public health or welfare in accordance with the public interest for drinking water supplies, conservation of fish, wildlife and other beneficial aquatic life, and agricultural, industrial, recreational, and other reasonable and necessary uses and to maintain and improve the biological integrity of the waters of the State. ( b) The following paragraphs describe the three tiers of the State's waters. (i) Tier 1 - Existing instream water uses and the level of water quality necessary to protect the existing uses shall be maintained and protected. (ii) Tier 2 - Where the quality of the waters exceed levels necessary to support propagation of fish, shellfish, and wildlife and recreation in and on the water, that quality shall be maintained and protected unless the division finds, after full satisfaction of the intergovernmental coordination and public participation provisions of the division's continuing planning process, that allowing lower water quality is necessary to accommodate important economic or social development in the area in which the waters are located.
  • The Georgia Coast Saltwater Paddle Trail

    The Georgia Coast Saltwater Paddle Trail

    2010 The Georgia Coast Saltwater Paddle Trail This project was funded in part by the Coastal Management Program of the Georgia Department of Natural Resources, and the U.S. Department of Commerce, Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management (OCRM), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) grant award #NA09NOS4190171, as well as the National Park Service Rivers, Trails & Conservation Assistance Program. The statements, findings, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of OCRM or NOAA. September 30, 2010 0 CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ......................................................................................................................................... 2 Coastal Georgia Regional Development Center Project Team .......................................................... 3 Planning and Government Services Staff ................................................................................................... 3 Geographic Information Systems Staff ....................................................................................................... 3 Economic Development Staff .......................................................................................................................... 3 Administrative Services Staff .......................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction ...............................................................................................................................................................
  • Total Maximum Daily Load Evaluation for Seventy-Two Stream Segments

    Total Maximum Daily Load Evaluation for Seventy-Two Stream Segments

    Total Maximum Daily Load Evaluation for Seventy-Two Stream Segments in the Oconee River Basin for Fecal Coliform Submitted to: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 4 Atlanta, Georgia Submitted by: The Georgia Department of Natural Resources Environmental Protection Division Atlanta, Georgia January 2007 Total Maximum Daily Load Evaluation January 2007 Oconee River Basin (Fecal Coliform) Table of Contents Section Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................. iv 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Watershed Description......................................................................................................1 1.3 Water Quality Standard.....................................................................................................5 2.0 WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT ...................................................................................... 15 3.0 SOURCE ASSESSMENT .................................................................................................... 16 3.1 Point Source Assessment ............................................................................................... 16 3.2 Nonpoint Source Assessment........................................................................................
  • View/Download PDF File

    View/Download PDF File

    Corrected : 02/10/2006 COVER SHEET FOR PROPOSAL TO THE NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION PROGRAM ANNOUNCEMENT/SOLICITATION NO./CLOSING DATE/if not in response to a program announcement/solicitation enter NSF 04-23 FOR NSF USE ONLY PD 05-7381 NSF PROPOSAL NUMBER FOR CONSIDERATION BY NSF ORGANIZATION UNIT(S) (Indicate the most specific unit known, i.e. program, division, etc.) DEB - ECOSYSTEM SCIENCE CLUSTER 0620959 DATE RECEIVED NUMBER OF COPIES DIVISION ASSIGNED FUND CODE DUNS# (Data Universal Numbering System) FILE LOCATION 02/01/2006 12 08010209 DEB 7381 004315578 02/10/2006 4:25pm EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (EIN) OR SHOW PREVIOUS AWARD NO. IF THIS IS IS THIS PROPOSAL BEING SUBMITTED TO ANOTHER FEDERAL TAXPAYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (TIN) A RENEWAL AGENCY? YES NO IF YES, LIST ACRONYM(S) AN ACCOMPLISHMENT-BASED RENEWAL 581353149 9217198 NAME OF ORGANIZATION TO WHICH AWARD SHOULD BE MADE ADDRESS OF AWARDEE ORGANIZATION, INCLUDING 9 DIGIT ZIP CODE University of Georgia Research Foundation Inc University of Georgia Research Foundation Inc 616 Boyd GSRC AWARDEE ORGANIZATION CODE (IF KNOWN) Athens, GA. 306027411 0015982001 NAME OF PERFORMING ORGANIZATION, IF DIFFERENT FROM ABOVE ADDRESS OF PERFORMING ORGANIZATION, IF DIFFERENT, INCLUDING 9 DIGIT ZIP CODE U of Georgia University of Georgia 617 Boyd Graduate Studies Bldg PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE (IF KNOWN) ATHENS, GA 30602-7411 0015982000 IS AWARDEE ORGANIZATION (Check All That Apply) SMALL BUSINESS MINORITY BUSINESS IF THIS IS A PRELIMINARY PROPOSAL (See GPG II.C For Definitions) FOR-PROFIT ORGANIZATION WOMAN-OWNED BUSINESS THEN CHECK HERE TITLE OF PROPOSED PROJECT LTER: Georgia Coastal Ecosystems-II REQUESTED AMOUNT PROPOSED DURATION (1-60 MONTHS) REQUESTED STARTING DATE SHOW RELATED PRELIMINARY PROPOSAL NO.
  • Stream-Temperature Charcteristics in Georgia

    Stream-Temperature Charcteristics in Georgia

    STREAM-TEMPERATURE CHARACTERISTICS IN GEORGIA U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Prepared in cooperation with the GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION Water-Resources Investigations Report 96-4203 STREAM-TEMPERATURE CHARACTERISTICS IN GEORGIA By T.R. Dyar and S.J. Alhadeff ______________________________________________________________________________ U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 96-4203 Prepared in cooperation with GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION Atlanta, Georgia 1997 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services 3039 Amwiler Road, Suite 130 Denver Federal Center Peachtree Business Center Box 25286 Atlanta, GA 30360-2824 Denver, CO 80225-0286 CONTENTS Page Abstract . 1 Introduction . 1 Purpose and scope . 2 Previous investigations. 2 Station-identification system . 3 Stream-temperature data . 3 Long-term stream-temperature characteristics. 6 Natural stream-temperature characteristics . 7 Regression analysis . 7 Harmonic mean coefficient . 7 Amplitude coefficient. 10 Phase coefficient . 13 Statewide harmonic equation . 13 Examples of estimating natural stream-temperature characteristics . 15 Panther Creek . 15 West Armuchee Creek . 15 Alcovy River . 18 Altamaha River . 18 Summary of stream-temperature characteristics by river basin . 19 Savannah River basin . 19 Ogeechee River basin. 25 Altamaha River basin. 25 Satilla-St Marys River basins. 26 Suwannee-Ochlockonee River basins . 27 Chattahoochee River basin. 27 Flint River basin. 28 Coosa River basin. 29 Tennessee River basin . 31 Selected references. 31 Tabular data . 33 Graphs showing harmonic stream-temperature curves of observed data and statewide harmonic equation for selected stations, figures 14-211 .
  • A Visitor's Guide to Accessing Georgia's Coastal Resources

    A Visitor's Guide to Accessing Georgia's Coastal Resources

    A Visitor’s Guide to Accessing Georgia’s Coastal Resources Beaches & Barrier Islands Cultural & Historic Sites Rivers & Waterways Wildlife Viewing & Walking Trails FREE COPY - NOT FOR SALE A Visitor’s Guide to Accessing Georgia’s Coastal Resources acknowledgements This Guide was prepared by The University of Georgia Marine Extension Service under grant award # NA06NOS4190253 from the Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. The statements, findings, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of OCRM or NOAA. The authors gratefully acknowledge the Georgia Department of Natural Resources’ Wildlife Resources Division and Parks and Historic Sites Division for their assistance and for permission to use certain descriptions, maps, and photographs in the drafting of this Guide. The authors also acknowledge the Coastal Resources Division and particularly Beach Water Quality Manager Elizabeth Cheney for providing GIS maps and other helpful assistance related to accessing Georgia beaches. This Access Guide was compiled and written by Phillip Flournoy and Casey Sanders. University of Georgia Marine Extension Service 715 Bay Street Brunswick, GA 31520 April 2008 Photo Credits: ~ Beak to Beak Egret Chicks by James Holland, Altamaha Riverkeeper ~ Sapelo Island Beach by Suzanne Van Parreren, Sapelo Island National Estuarine Research Reserve ~ Main House, Hofwyl Plantation by Robert Overman, University of Georgia Marine Extension Service ~ J. T. Good, A Chip Off the Block by Captain Brooks Good table of contents Acknowledgements. 2 Map of Georgia Coastal Counties and the Barrier Islands. 5 Foreword. 6 1. Beaches and Barrier Islands . 7 a. Chatham County.
  • 2020 Integrated 305(B)/303(D) List

    2020 Integrated 305(B)/303(D) List

    2020 Integrated 305(b)/303(d) List - Streams Reach Name/ID Reach Location/County River Basin/ Assessment/ Cause/ Size/Unit Category/ Notes Use Data Provider Source Priority Alex Creek Mason Cowpen Branch to Altamaha Not Supporting DO 3 4a TMDL completed DO 2002. Altamaha River GAR030701060503 Wayne Fishing 1,55,10 NP Miles Altamaha River Confluence of Oconee and Altamaha Supporting 72 1 TMDL completed Fish Tissue (Mercury) 2002. Ocmulgee Rivers to ITT Rayonier GAR030701060401 Appling, Wayne, Jeff Davis Fishing 1,55 Miles Altamaha River ITT Rayonier to Altamaha Assessment 20 3 TMDL completed Fish Tissue (Mercury) 2002. More Penholoway Creek Pending data need to be collected and evaluated before it GAR030701060402 Wayne Fishing 10,55 Miles can be determined whether the designated use of Fishing is being met. Altamaha River Penholoway Creek to Altamaha Supporting 27 1 Butler River GAR030701060501 Wayne, Glynn, McIntosh Fishing 1,55 Miles Beards Creek Chapel Creek to Spring Altamaha Not Supporting Bio F 7 4a TMDL completed Bio F 2017. Branch GAR030701060308 Tattnall, Long Fishing 4 NP Miles Beards Creek Spring Branch to Altamaha Not Supporting Bio F 11 4a TMDL completed Bio F in 2012. Altamaha River GAR030701060301 Tattnall Fishing 1,55,10,4 NP, UR Miles Big Cedar Creek Griffith Branch to Little Altamaha Assessment 5 3 This site has a narrative rank of fair for Cedar Creek Pending macroinvertebrates. Waters with a narrative rank GAR030701070108 Washington Fishing 59 Miles of fair will remain in Category 3 until EPD completes the reevaluation of the metrics used to assess macroinvertebrate data. Big Cedar Creek Little Cedar Creek (at Altamaha Not Supporting FC 6 5 EPD needs to determine the "natural DO" for the Donovan Hwy) to Little area before a use assessment is made.
  • False Dichotomy Between Growth and Clean Water? the Harpeth River Experience with Citizen Suits and Beyond

    False Dichotomy Between Growth and Clean Water? the Harpeth River Experience with Citizen Suits and Beyond

    River Management Society Supporting Professionals Who Study, Protect, and Manage RMS SPRING 2017 VOLUME 30, NO. 1 North America’s Rivers Southeast Focus RMS Pro-Purchase News..................... 4 Virginia’s Scenic Rivers ........................ 6 Restoring the Mulberry River ................ 8 Tennessee Wildlife Federation Gift ....... 9 The Obion Basin Fight ........................ 10 Family Fun on the Pascagoula ........... 13 Tennessee River Basin Network......... 14 Conservation Easements - A Tool ....... 15 Bama’s Bone Dry ................................ 16 Wonks, Water, Walls, and... .............. 18 Georgia Water Trails ........................... 21 San Antonio River Authority ................ 24 RMS Chapter Updates ....................... 27 Innovative Tennessee River Project ... 28 Google Earth aerial image of the Franklin sewer plant and Harpeth River. False Dichotomy Between Growth and Clean Water? The Harpeth River Experience with Citizen Suits and Beyond by James M. Redwine The State Scenic Harpeth River, Greater Founded in 1999, the Harpeth River So often, the choice is portrayed to be Nashville, and the Harpeth River Watershed Association is a 501(c)(3) between clean water and growth, with Watershed Association not-for-profit, science-based conservation clean water inevitably the loser. The organization dedicated to protecting the Harpeth River Watershed Association The Harpeth River is among the State Scenic Harpeth River and clean (HRWA) does not believe that this always unique freshwater river systems of the water in Tennessee. To protect the river has to be the case. Rather, HRWA’s recent Southeast. These systems contain some and effect change, HRWA collaborates experience with a citizen suit under the of the greatest variety of aquatic life with landowners, businesses, community, federal Clean Water Act (CWA) (and its in the world.
  • 2018 Integrated 305(B)/303(D) List

    2018 Integrated 305(B)/303(D) List

    2018 Integrated 305(b)/303(d) List - Coastal Streams Reach Name/ID Reach Location/County River Basin/ Assessment/ Cause/ Size/Unit Category/ Notes Use Data Provider Source Priority Altamaha River Butler River to Altamaha Altamaha Supporting 7 1 Sound GAR030701060509 Glynn, McIntosh Fishing 1,5,55 Miles Bungalow Creek Headwaters to Hampton River Altamaha Supporting 2 1 GAR030701060519 Glynn Fishing 5 Miles Butler River Altamaha River to Altamaha Altamaha Supporting 5 1 River (upstream and downstream of I-95) GAR030701060504 McIntosh Fishing 5 Miles Darien River Cathead Creek to May Hall Altamaha Supporting 5 1 Creek (formerly Cathead Creek to May Creek) GAR030701060511 McIntosh Fishing 1,5,55 Miles Hampton River Village Creek to Bungalow Altamaha Supporting 1 1 Creek GAR030701060521 Glynn Fishing 5 Miles Hampton River Jones Creek to Mosquito Creek Altamaha Assessment 3 3 EPD needs to determine the "natural DO" for the Pending area before a use assessment is made. GAR030701060520 Glynn Fishing 5 Miles Hampton River Mosquito Creek to Village Altamaha Supporting 3 1 Creek GAR030701060516 Glynn Fishing 5 Miles Pine Creek Hampton River to the Altamaha Supporting 2 1 Hampton River GAR030701060517 Glynn Fishing 5 Miles South Altamaha River Altamaha River to Buttermilk Altamaha Supporting 15 1 Sound GAR030701060505 McIntosh, Glynn Fishing 5 Miles A - 286 2018 Integrated 305(b)/303(d) List - Coastal Streams Reach Name/ID Reach Location/County River Basin/ Assessment/ Cause/ Size/Unit Category/ Notes Use Data Provider Source Priority South Branch (aka Altamaha River to Altamaha Altamaha Supporting 5 1 South Altamaha River) River near Cambers Island GAR030701060510 McIntosh, Glynn Fishing 5 Miles Tributary to Village Headwaters to Village Creek Altamaha Assessment 2 3 EPD needs to determine the "natural DO" for the Creek Pending area before a use assessment is made.
  • 2018 Integrated 305(B)

    2018 Integrated 305(B)

    2018 Integrated 305(b)/303(d) List - Streams Reach Name/ID Reach Location/County River Basin/ Assessment/ Cause/ Size/Unit Category/ Notes Use Data Provider Source Priority Alex Creek Mason Cowpen Branch to Altamaha Not Supporting DO 3 4a TMDL completed DO 2002. Altamaha River GAR030701060503 Wayne Fishing 1,55,10 NP Miles Altamaha River Confluence of Oconee and Altamaha Supporting 72 1 TMDL completed TWR 2002. Ocmulgee Rivers to ITT Rayonier GAR030701060401 Appling, Wayne, Jeff Davis Fishing 1,55 Miles Altamaha River ITT Rayonier to Penholoway Altamaha Assessment 20 3 TMDL completed TWR 2002. More data need to Creek Pending be collected and evaluated before it can be determined whether the designated use of Fishing is being met. GAR030701060402 Wayne Fishing 10,55 Miles Altamaha River Penholoway Creek to Butler Altamaha Supporting 27 1 River GAR030701060501 Wayne, Glynn, McIntosh Fishing 1,55 Miles Beards Creek Chapel Creek to Spring Branch Altamaha Not Supporting Bio F 7 4a TMDL completed Bio F 2017. GAR030701060308 Tattnall, Long Fishing 4 NP Miles Beards Creek Spring Branch to Altamaha Altamaha Not Supporting Bio F 11 4a TMDL completed Bio F in 2012. River GAR030701060301 Tattnall Fishing 1,55,10,4 NP, UR Miles Big Cedar Creek Griffith Branch to Little Cedar Altamaha Assessment 5 3 This site has a narrative rank of fair for Creek Pending macroinvertebrates. Waters with a narrative rank of fair will remain in Category 3 until EPD completes the reevaluation of the metrics used to assess macroinvertebrate data. GAR030701070108 Washington Fishing 59 Miles Big Cedar Creek Little Cedar Creek to Ohoopee Altamaha Not Supporting DO, FC 3 4a TMDLs completed DO 2002 & FC (2002 & 2007).