DOCSLIB.ORG

Level 1 Flora and Vegetation Survey – Collie-Lake King Road Between SLK 64.5 – 71, Bowelling Curves

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Level 1 Flora and Vegetation Survey – Collie-Lake King Road Between SLK 64.5 – 71, Bowelling Curves Level 1 Flora and Vegetation Survey – Collie-Lake King Road between SLK 64.5 – 71, Bowelling Curves Prepared for Main Roads WA Revised 13 November 2014 Ecoedge Environmental Pty Ltd t: 08 97211377 PO Box 1180 Bunbury, 6231 Western Australia [email protected] ABN: 89 136 929 989 Ecoedge Review Version Origin Review release Issue date date approval v6 TB MS, RS 11/11/2014 v7 RS MS 12/11/2014 V8 RS MS 13/11/2014 Final draft RS, MS 13/11/2014 MS (released 13/11/2014 MS to MRWA) Final 2 | P a g e Executive Summary Ecoedge was engaged by Main Roads in August 2014 to undertake a Level 1 Flora and Vegetation Survey of remnant vegetation along the Collie-Lake King Road (Coalfields Road) - Bowelling curves SLK 64.5-71.0, in the Shire of West Arthur. Main Roads WA is conducting investigations for the future widening and re-alignment of Collie-Lake King Road. The initial survey of northern and southern alignment options was undertaken in September, 2014. A revised and expanded survey area of the southern alignment option was assessed in late October 2014 for two reasons. Firstly, a population of Leucopogon subsejunctus (Priority 2) had been found within the initial survey area and it was hoped to identify the extent of the species so as to assess and minimise the impact if removal of some specimens could not be avoided. In the interests of clarity, the initial survey area (37.3 ha) will be referred to as Area “A” and the expanded survey area (58.4 ha), which encompassed the southern alignment of the initial survey area, will be referred to as Area “B”. Area A, which totals 37.3 ha (of which about 20 ha is remnant native vegetation), is separated over much of its length into alternative northern and southern alignments. Area B, totalling 58.4 ha, includes about 46 ha of remnant vegetation. The flora and vegetation assessment of Areas A and B resulted in the identification of 220 vascular plant taxa, including 20 exotic species. One of the exotic species, Moraea flaccida (One-leaf Cape Tulip) is listed as a C3 pest plant for the Shire of West Arthur. No Declared Rare Flora under the WC Act, or plants listed as threatened under the Commonwealth EPBC Act were found within the survey areas. However, two Priority Flora species, Leucopogon subsejunctus (P2) and Synaphea hians (P3) were found; both of them are presumed to be newly-discovered occurrences. The populations were marked in the field using metal stakes and Day-Glo tape. The population of S. hians lies wholly within Area A and comprises approximately 20 plants. Synaphea hians has a relatively widespread distribution in the south-west of Western Australia ranging about 150 km east-west and 75 km north south. The initial survey (Area A), identified a population of Leucopogon subsejunctus (P2) over an area of about 0.5 ha with 27% (40-60 plants) within the survey area. The second survey (Area B) identified three sub-populations (including the population found during the first survey), totalling 5.5 ha and consisting of 2,500 to 3,000 individual plants. Approximately 4.1 ha occur within survey Area B. L. subsejunctus, which is a newly described taxon, has a relatively restricted distribution to the east and south east of Bowelling of about 25 km north-south and 15 km east-west. 3 | P a g e Six vegetation units were recognised and mapped for the two survey areas, including a unit represented mainly by areas of pasture. Most of the vegetation complexes in which these vegetation units occur are deemed to be well represented in conservation reserves and State forest. However, the herb-rich Melaleuca viminea shrubland unit, which is found on the flats of the Collie River East, much of which has been cleared for agriculture, may be a restricted floristic community type. This vegetation unit is contained within the ‘Swamp’ vegetation complex of Mattiske and Havel (1998), which is a very broad mapping unit of woodlands, shrublands or heaths, and sedgelands associated with valley floors throughout the eastern part of the Northern Jarrah Forest. The extent remaining of the ‘Swamp’ vegetation complex meets EPA and Commonwealth retention targets, however of the many vegetation units at the ‘floristic community type’ level contained within the ‘Swamp’ complex, some are likely to be restricted and poorly conserved (mainly as a result of past clearing for agriculture) – the Melaleuca viminea shrubland vegetation unit within the survey areas is likely to be one of these. With regard to floristic conservation factors, the southern proposed alignment of Area A and Area B is the more sensitive because it contains both the potentially restricted Melaleuca viminea shrubland on the flats of the Collie River East, and also the three sub- populations of the Priority 2 species Leucopogon subsejunctus. The Priority 3 species Synaphea hians occurs within the easternmost section of Area A, which is shared between both the northern and southern alignment options. 4 | P a g e Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 3 Statement of limitations ......................................................................................................................... 8 Reliance on Data ................................................................................................................................. 8 Report for Benefit of Client ................................................................................................................. 8 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 9 1.1 Scope and objectives .............................................................................................................. 9 1.2 Biogeographic region ............................................................................................................ 10 1.3 Site location and features ..................................................................................................... 10 1.4 Geology ................................................................................................................................. 10 1.5 Vegetation ............................................................................................................................. 14 1.6 Threatened and Priority Ecological Communities................................................................. 18 1.7 Threatened and Priority Flora ............................................................................................... 19 2 Methods ........................................................................................................................................ 25 2.1 Survey Area A ........................................................................................................................ 25 2.2 Survey Area B ........................................................................................................................ 25 2.3 Survey limitations ................................................................................................................. 27 3 Results ........................................................................................................................................... 27 3.1 Declared Plants ..................................................................................................................... 27 3.2 Rare Flora .............................................................................................................................. 30 3.2.1 Area A ............................................................................................................................ 30 3.2.2 Area B ............................................................................................................................ 30 3.2.3 Conservation Status of the Priority Flora ...................................................................... 31 3.3 Vegetation Units ................................................................................................................... 36 3.3.1 Area A ............................................................................................................................ 36 3.3.2 Area B ............................................................................................................................ 36 3.3.3 Conservation Status of the Vegetation Units in Area A and Area B ............................. 37 3.4 Vegetation Condition ............................................................................................................ 46 3.4.1 Area A ............................................................................................................................ 46 3.4.2 Area B ............................................................................................................................ 46 4 Discussion ...................................................................................................................................... 54 4.1 Weeds, including declared pest plants ................................................................................. 54 4.2 Declared and Priority Flora ................................................................................................... 54 4.2.1 Area A ...........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • BORR IPT 2019A - Part 1 of 12)
    APPENDIX C ATTACHMENTS LIST (BORR IPT 2019a - Part 1 of 12) Biota. (2019b). Bunbury Outer Ring Road Southern Section Targeted Fauna Assessment. Unpublished report prepared for Main Roads Western Australia. BORR IPT. (2019a). Bunbury Outer Ring Road Southern Section Vegetation and Flora Study. Unpublished report prepared for Main Roads Western Australia. Brad Goode & Associates. (2012). Aboriginal Heritage Survey Report of the Proposed Bunbury Outer Ring Road Stage 2, Western Australia. Unpublished report prepared for GHD Pty Ltd on behalf of Main Roads Western Australia. Main Roads WA. (2018). Environmental Policy. WRM. (2019). Bunbury Outer Ring Road Southern Investigation Area: Targeted Conservation Significant Aquatic Fauna Survey. Unpublished report prepared for BORR IPT on behalf of Main Roads Western Australia. Bunbury Outer Ring Road Southern Section Vegetation and Flora Study September 2019 Executive Summary The Commissioner of Main Roads Western Australia (Main Roads) is planning for the construction of the Bunbury Outer Ring Road (BORR) Project. BORR is a planned Controlled Access Highway linking the Forrest Highway and Bussell Highway. The completed BORR will provide a high standard route for access to the Bunbury Port and facilitate proposed development to the east of the City of Bunbury. BORR will also provide an effective bypass of Bunbury for inter-regional traffic. BORR forms a major component of the planned regional road network for the Greater Bunbury area. The land requirement for BORR is identified in the Greater Bunbury Region Scheme (GBRS). The proposed BORR comprises three sections: ‘BORR Northern Section’ – Forrest Highway to Boyanup-Picton Road ‘BORR Central Section’ – The Central Section has been previously constructed however further improvements are proposed for this section, including the extension of Willinge Drive southwards to South Western Highway ‘BORR Southern Section’ – South Western Highway (near Bunbury Airport) to Bussell Highway.
    [Show full text]
  • Detailed Flora and Vegetation Assessment Carrabungup Road, Nirimba Project No: EP20-102(01)
    Detailed Flora and Vegetation Assessment Carrabungup Road, Nirimba Project No: EP20-102(01) Prepared for Shire of Murray February 2021 Prepared for Shire of Murray Doc No.: EP20-102(05)--006 RAW| Version: 001 Detailed Flora and Vegetation Assessment Carrabungup Road, Nirimba Document Control Doc name: Detailed Flora and Vegetation Assessment Carrabungup Road, Nirimba Doc no.: EP20-102(05)--006 RAW Version Date Author Reviewer February 2021 Tom Atkinson TAA Rachel Weber RAW 1 Report prepared for client review © 2021 Emerge Associates All Rights Reserved. Copyright in the whole and every part of this document belongs to Emerge Associates and may not be used, sold, transferred, copied or reproduced in whole or in part in any manner or form or in or on any media to any person without the prior written consent of Emerge Associates. Project number: EP20-102(01)|February 2021 Page i Prepared for Shire of Murray Doc No.: EP20-102(05)--006 RAW| Version: 001 Detailed Flora and Vegetation Assessment Carrabungup Road, Nirimba Executive Summary The Shire of Murray engaged Emerge Associates (Emerge) to undertake a detailed flora and vegetation survey along section of Carrabungup Road in Nirimba (referred to herein as the ‘site’). Emerge were engaged to conduct a detailed assessment to provide information on the flora and vegetation values to inform a clearing permit application. As part of the assessment a desktop review of relevant background information was completed and a field survey was undertaken in September and December 2020. During the field survey an assessment was made on the type, condition and values of vegetation across the site.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora and Vegetation Survey of the Proposed Kwinana to Australind Gas
    __________________________________________________________________________________ FLORA AND VEGETATION SURVEY OF THE PROPOSED KWINANA TO AUSTRALIND GAS PIPELINE INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR Prepared for: Bowman Bishaw Gorham and Department of Mineral and Petroleum Resources Prepared by: Mattiske Consulting Pty Ltd November 2003 MATTISKE CONSULTING PTY LTD DRD0301/039/03 __________________________________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. SUMMARY............................................................................................................................................... 1 2. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Location................................................................................................................................................. 2 2.2 Climate .................................................................................................................................................. 2 2.3 Vegetation.............................................................................................................................................. 3 2.4 Declared Rare and Priority Flora......................................................................................................... 3 2.5 Local and Regional Significance........................................................................................................... 5 2.6 Threatened
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Plants of Bendigo
    Produced by Indigenous Plants of Bendigo Indigenous Plants of Bendigo PMS 1807 RED PMS 432 GREY PMS 142 GOLD A Gardener’s Guide to Growing and Protecting Local Plants 3rd Edition 9 © Copyright City of Greater Bendigo and Bendigo Native Plant Group Inc. This work is Copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the City of Greater Bendigo. First Published 2004 Second Edition 2007 Third Edition 2013 Printed by Bendigo Modern Press: www.bmp.com.au This book is also available on the City of Greater Bendigo website: www.bendigo.vic.gov.au Printed on 100% recycled paper. Disclaimer “The information contained in this publication is of a general nature only. This publication is not intended to provide a definitive analysis, or discussion, on each issue canvassed. While the Committee/Council believes the information contained herein is correct, it does not accept any liability whatsoever/howsoever arising from reliance on this publication. Therefore, readers should make their own enquiries, and conduct their own investigations, concerning every issue canvassed herein.” Front cover - Clockwise from centre top: Bendigo Wax-flower (Pam Sheean), Hoary Sunray (Marilyn Sprague), Red Ironbark (Pam Sheean), Green Mallee (Anthony Sheean), Whirrakee Wattle (Anthony Sheean). Table of contents Acknowledgements ...............................................2 Foreword..........................................................3 Introduction.......................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • South West Region
    Regional Services Division – South West Region South West Region ‐ Parks & Wildlife and FPC Disturbance Operations Flora and Vegetation Survey Assessment Form 1. Proposed Operations: (to be completed by proponent) NBX0217 Summary of Proposed Operation: Road Construction and Timber Harvesting New road construction – 3.75km Existing road upgrade – 14.9km New gravel pit construction – 2ha (exploration area) Contact Person and Contact Details: Adam Powell [email protected] 0427 191 332 Area of impact; District/Region, State Forest Block, Coupe/Compartment (shapefile to be provided): Blackwood District South West Region Barrabup 0317 Period of proposed disturbance: November 2016 to December 2017 1 2.Desktop Assessment: (to be completed by the Region) ‐ Check Forest Ecosystem reservation. Forest Ecosystems proposed for impact: Jarrah Forest‐Blackwood Plateau, Shrub, herb and sedgelands, Darling Scarp Y Are activities in a Forest Ecosystem that triggers informal reservation under the FMP? The Darling Scarp Forest Ecosystem is a Poorly Reserved Forest Ecosystem and needs to be protected as an Informal Reserve under the Forest Management Plan (Appendix 11) ‐ Check Vegetation Complexes, extents remaining uncleared and in reservation (DEC 2007/EPA 2006). Vegetation Complex Pre‐European extent (%) Pre‐European extent (Ha) Extent in formal/informal reservation (%) Bidella (BD) 94% 44,898 47% Darling Scarp (DS) Figures not available Corresponds to Darling Scarp Forest Ecosystem extent Gale (GA) 80% 899 17% Jalbarragup (JL) 91% 14,786 32% Kingia (KI) 96% 97,735 34% Telerah (TL) 92% 25,548 33% Wishart (WS2) 84% 2,796 35% Y Do any complexes trigger informal reservation under the FMP? Darling Scarp complex as discussed above Y Are any complexes significant as per EPA regionally significant vegetation? Gale (GA) complex is cleared below the recommended retention of 1,500ha (Molloy et.al 2007) ‐ Check Threatened flora and TEC/PEC databases over an appropriate radius of the disturbance boundary.
    [Show full text]
  • Scott River Ironstone Association (Update)
    Interim Recovery Plan No. 339 Scott River Ironstone Association (update) Interim Recovery Plan 2015-2020 Department of Parks and Wildlife, Kensington April 2015 Foreword Interim Recovery Plans (IRPs) are developed within the framework laid down in Department of Parks and Wildlife Policy Statements Nos. 44 and 50 (CALM 1992; CALM 1994). The Department of Conservation and Land Management (CALM) formally became the Department of Environment and Conservation (DEC) in July 2006 and the Department of Parks and Wildlife in July 2013 (the Department). Recovery plans outline the recovery actions that are required to urgently address those threatening processes most affecting the ongoing survival of threatened taxa or ecological communities, and begin the recovery process. The Department is committed to ensuring that threatened ecological communities are conserved through the preparation and implementation of recovery plans or interim recovery plans and by ensuring that conservation action commences as soon as possible after listing. This plan will operate from April 2015 but will remain in force until withdrawn or replaced. It is intended that, if the community is still listed after five years, the need for an updated plan will be evaluated. This plan was approved by the Director of Science and Conservation on 7 April 2015. The provision of funds identified in this plan is dependent on budgetary and other constraints affecting the Department, as well as the need to address other priorities. This plan replaces IRP no. 217 Scott River Ironstone Association 2004-2009 by R. Luu and V. English. Information in this plan was accurate at December 2014. Plan preparation: This reviewed and updated plan was prepared by Jill Pryde (Department of Parks and Wildlife).
    [Show full text]
  • Vertebrate Fauna in the Southern Forests of Western Australia
    tssN 0085-8129 ODC151:146 VertebrateFauna in The SouthernForests of WesternAustralia A Survey P. CHRISTENSEN,A. ANNELS, G. LIDDELOW AND P. SKINNER FORESTS DEPARTMENT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA BULLETIN94, 1985 T:- VertebrateFauna in The SouthernForests of WesternAustralia A Survey By P. CHRISTENSEN, A. ANNELS, G. LIDDELOW AND P. SKINNER Edited by Liana ChristensenM.A. (w.A.I.T.) Preparedfor Publicationby Andrew C.A. Cribb B.A. (U.W.A.) P.J. McNamara Acting Conservator of Forcsts 1985 I I r FRONT COVER The Bush R.at (Rattus fuscipes): the most abundantof the native mammals recordedby the surueyteams in WesternAustralia's southernforests. Coverphotograph: B. A. & A. C. WELLS Printed in WesternAustralia Publishedby the ForestsDepartmeDt of WesternAustralia Editor MarianneR.L. Lewis AssistantEditor Andrew C.A. Cribb DesignTrish Ryder CPl9425/7/85- Bf Atthority WILLIAM BENBOW,Aciing Cov€mmenaPrinter, Wesrern Ausrralia + Contents Page SUMMARY SECTION I-INTRODUCTION HistoricalBackground. Recent Perspectives SECTION II-DESCRIPTION OF SURVEY AREA Boundariesand PhysicalFeatures 3 Geology 3 Soils 3 Climate 6 Vegetation 6 VegetationTypes. 8 SECTION III-SURVEY METHODS 13 SECTION IV-SURVEY RESULTSAND LIST OF SPECIES. l6 (A) MAMMALS Discussionof Findings. l6 List of Species (i) IndigenousSpecies .17 (ii) IntroducedSpecies .30 (B) BIRDS Discussionof Findings List of Species .34 (C) REPTILES Discussionof Findings. List of Species. .49 (D) AMPHIBIANS Discussionof Findings. 55 List of Species. 55 (E) FRESHWATER FISH Discussionof Findings. .59 List of Species (i) IndigenousSpecies 59 (ii) IntroducedSpecies 6l SECTION V-GENERALDISCUSSION 63 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 68 REFERENCES 69 APPENDICES I-Results from Fauna Surveys 1912-t982 72 II-Results from Other ResearchStudies '74 Within The SurveyArea 1970-1982.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetaton and Flora of Lot 9503 Wedgetail Circle Parkerville
    VEGETATON AND FLORA OF LOT 9503 WEDGETAIL CIRCLE PARKERVILLE Prepared for: COTERRA ENVIRONMENT 19/336 Churchill Avenue, SUBIACO WA 6008 Prepared by: Bennett Environmental Consulting Pty Ltd Sollya heterophylla PO Box 341 KALAMUNDA 6926 December 2012 STATEMENT OF LIMITATIONS Scope of Services This report (“the report”) has been prepared in accordance with the scope of services set out in the contract, or as otherwise agreed, between the Client and Eleanor Bennett (“the Author”). In some circumstances a range of factors such as time, budget, access and/or site disturbance constraints may have limited the scope of services. Reliance on Data In preparing the report, the Author has relied upon data, surveys, analyses, designs, plans and other information provided by the Client and other individuals and organisations, most of which are referred to in the report (“the data”). Except as otherwise stated in the report, the Author has not verified the accuracy or completeness of the data. To the extent that the statements, opinions, facts, information, conclusions and/or recommendations in the report (“conclusions”) are based in whole or part on the data, those conclusions are contingent upon the accuracy and completeness of the data. The Author will not be liable in relation to incorrect conclusions should any data, information or condition be incorrect or have been concealed, withheld, misrepresented or otherwise not fully disclosed to the Author. Environmental Conclusions In accordance with the scope of services, the Author has relied upon the data and has conducted environmental field monitoring and/or testing in the preparation of the report. The nature and extent of monitoring and/or testing conducted is described in the report.
    [Show full text]
  • Doctorat De L'université De Toulouse
    En vue de l’obt ention du DOCTORAT DE L’UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE Délivré par : Université Toulouse 3 Paul Sabatier (UT3 Paul Sabatier) Discipline ou spécialité : Ecologie, Biodiversité et Evolution Présentée et soutenue par : Joeri STRIJK le : 12 / 02 / 2010 Titre : Species diversification and differentiation in the Madagascar and Indian Ocean Islands Biodiversity Hotspot JURY Jérôme CHAVE, Directeur de Recherches CNRS Toulouse Emmanuel DOUZERY, Professeur à l'Université de Montpellier II Porter LOWRY II, Curator Missouri Botanical Garden Frédéric MEDAIL, Professeur à l'Université Paul Cezanne Aix-Marseille Christophe THEBAUD, Professeur à l'Université Paul Sabatier Ecole doctorale : Sciences Ecologiques, Vétérinaires, Agronomiques et Bioingénieries (SEVAB) Unité de recherche : UMR 5174 CNRS-UPS Evolution & Diversité Biologique Directeur(s) de Thèse : Christophe THEBAUD Rapporteurs : Emmanuel DOUZERY, Professeur à l'Université de Montpellier II Porter LOWRY II, Curator Missouri Botanical Garden Contents. CONTENTS CHAPTER 1. General Introduction 2 PART I: ASTERACEAE CHAPTER 2. Multiple evolutionary radiations and phenotypic convergence in polyphyletic Indian Ocean Daisy Trees (Psiadia, Asteraceae) (in preparation for BMC Evolutionary Biology) 14 CHAPTER 3. Taxonomic rearrangements within Indian Ocean Daisy Trees (Psiadia, Asteraceae) and the resurrection of Frappieria (in preparation for Taxon) 34 PART II: MYRSINACEAE CHAPTER 4. Phylogenetics of the Mascarene endemic genus Badula relative to its Madagascan ally Oncostemum (Myrsinaceae) (accepted in Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society) 43 CHAPTER 5. Timing and tempo of evolutionary diversification in Myrsinaceae: Badula and Oncostemum in the Indian Ocean Island Biodiversity Hotspot (in preparation for BMC Evolutionary Biology) 54 PART III: MONIMIACEAE CHAPTER 6. Biogeography of the Monimiaceae (Laurales): a role for East Gondwana and long distance dispersal, but not West Gondwana (accepted in Journal of Biogeography) 72 CHAPTER 7 General Discussion 86 REFERENCES 91 i Contents.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER?
    Lankesteriana International Journal on Orchidology ISSN: 1409-3871 [email protected] Universidad de Costa Rica Costa Rica BACKHOUSE, GARY N. ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER? A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF THREATENED ORCHIDS IN AUSTRALIA Lankesteriana International Journal on Orchidology, vol. 7, núm. 1-2, marzo, 2007, pp. 28- 43 Universidad de Costa Rica Cartago, Costa Rica Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=44339813005 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative LANKESTERIANA 7(1-2): 28-43. 2007. ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER? A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF THREATENED ORCHIDS IN AUSTRALIA GARY N. BACKHOUSE Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Division, Department of Sustainability and Environment 8 Nicholson Street, East Melbourne, Victoria 3002 Australia [email protected] KEY WORDS:threatened orchids Australia conservation status Introduction Many orchid species are included in this list. This paper examines the listing process for threatened Australia has about 1700 species of orchids, com- orchids in Australia, compares regional and national prising about 1300 named species in about 190 gen- lists of threatened orchids, and provides recommen- era, plus at least 400 undescribed species (Jones dations for improving the process of listing regionally 2006, pers. comm.). About 1400 species (82%) are and nationally threatened orchids. geophytes, almost all deciduous, seasonal species, while 300 species (18%) are evergreen epiphytes Methods and/or lithophytes. At least 95% of this orchid flora is endemic to Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Bauxite Mining Restoration with Natural Soils and Residue Sands: Comparison of the Recovery of Soil Ecosystem Function and Ground-Dwelling Invertebrate Diversity
    School of Molecular and Life Sciences Bauxite Mining Restoration with Natural Soils and Residue Sands: Comparison of the Recovery of Soil Ecosystem Function and Ground-dwelling Invertebrate Diversity Dilanka Madusani Mihindukulasooriya Weerasinghe This thesis is presented for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy of Curtin University May 2019 Author’s Declaration To the best of my knowledge and belief, this thesis contains no material previously published by any other person except where due acknowledgement has been made. This thesis contains no material that has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any university. Signature………………………………………………… Date………………………………………………………... iii Statement of authors’ contributions Experimental set up, data collection, data analysis and data interpretation for Chapter 2, 3,4 and 5 was done by D. Mihindukulasooriya. Experimental set up established by Lythe et al. (2017) used for experimental chapter 6. Data collection, data analysis and data interpretation for long term effect of woody debris addition was done by D. Mihindukulasooriya. iv Abstract Human destruction of the natural environment has been identified as a global problem that has triggered the loss of biodiversity. This degradation and loss has altered ecosystem processes and the resilience of ecosystems to environmental changes. Restoration of degraded habitats forms a significant component of conservation efforts. Open cut mining is one activity that can dramatically alter local communities, and successful vascular plant restoration does not necessarily result in restoration of other components of flora and fauna or result in a fully functioning ecosystem. Therefore, restoration studies should focus on improving ecological functions such as nutrient cycling and litter decomposition, seed dispersal and/ or pollination, and assess community composition beyond vegetation to attain fully functioning systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Baja California, Mexico, and a Vegetation Map of Colonet Mesa Alan B
    Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany Volume 29 | Issue 1 Article 4 2011 Plants of the Colonet Region, Baja California, Mexico, and a Vegetation Map of Colonet Mesa Alan B. Harper Terra Peninsular, Coronado, California Sula Vanderplank Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, Claremont, California Mark Dodero Recon Environmental Inc., San Diego, California Sergio Mata Terra Peninsular, Coronado, California Jorge Ochoa Long Beach City College, Long Beach, California Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Botany Commons, and the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Harper, Alan B.; Vanderplank, Sula; Dodero, Mark; Mata, Sergio; and Ochoa, Jorge (2011) "Plants of the Colonet Region, Baja California, Mexico, and a Vegetation Map of Colonet Mesa," Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: Vol. 29: Iss. 1, Article 4. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol29/iss1/4 Aliso, 29(1), pp. 25–42 ’ 2011, Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden PLANTS OF THE COLONET REGION, BAJA CALIFORNIA, MEXICO, AND A VEGETATION MAPOF COLONET MESA ALAN B. HARPER,1 SULA VANDERPLANK,2 MARK DODERO,3 SERGIO MATA,1 AND JORGE OCHOA4 1Terra Peninsular, A.C., PMB 189003, Suite 88, Coronado, California 92178, USA ([email protected]); 2Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, 1500 North College Avenue, Claremont, California 91711, USA; 3Recon Environmental Inc., 1927 Fifth Avenue, San Diego, California 92101, USA; 4Long Beach City College, 1305 East Pacific Coast Highway, Long Beach, California 90806, USA ABSTRACT The Colonet region is located at the southern end of the California Floristic Province, in an area known to have the highest plant diversity in Baja California.
    [Show full text]