Neuroptera: Coniopterygidae): the First Neuropteran Fossil in Rovno Amber (Ukraine)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Neuroptera: Coniopterygidae): the First Neuropteran Fossil in Rovno Amber (Ukraine) © Entomologica Fennica. 7 March 2008 Archiconiocompsa prisca Enderlein (Neuroptera: Coniopterygidae): The first neuropteran fossil in Rovno amber (Ukraine) Janusz Kupryj anowicz & Vladimir N. Makarkin Kupryjanowicz, J. & Makarkin, V. N. 2008: Archiconiocompsaprisca Enderlein (Neuroptera: Coniopterygidae): The first neuropteran fossil in Rovno amber (Ukraine). — Entomol. Fennica 19: 25—3 1. Archiconiocompsaprisca Enderlein, previously known from Baltic amber, is re- corded in Rovno amber. A discussion of the systematic position of this mono- typic genus is provided; it is tentatively assigned to Coniocompsini (Aleuro- pteryginae). J. Kupryjanowicz, Institute ofBiology, University ofBialystok, Swierkowa 20 B, 15—950 Bialystok, and Museum ofthe Earth Polish Academy ofSciences, Al. Na Sharpie 26/2 7, 00—488 Warszawa, Poland; E—mail.‘ [email protected] V. N. Makarkin (corresponding author), Institute ofBiology and Soil Sciences, Far Eastern Branch ofthe Russian Academy ofSciences, Vladivostok, 690022, Russia; E—mail.‘ [email protected] Received 22 March 2007, accepted 19 May 2007 1. Introduction Eocene in the age (Engel & Perkovsky 2006a, Perkovsky et al. 2007). Amber and its insect inclusions from the Rovno In this paper, we report the first neuropteran Region ofUkraine is currently attracting much at- from Rovno amber, the coniopterygid species tention, and it has recently been intensively stud- Archiconiocompsa prisca Enderlein, previously ied (e.g., Dlussky 2002, Dlussky & Perkovsky known from Baltic amber, and discuss the sys- 2002, Simutnik 2002, Kononova 2003, Perkov- tematic position of the genus. sky et al. 2003a,b, 2007, Putshkov & Popov The family Coniopterygidae today is com- 2003, Fedotova & Perkovsky 2004, 2005, Per- prised ofminute insects with reduced wing vena— kovsky & Fedotova 2004, Polilov & Perkovsky tion; it has relatively few species, distributed 2004, Gumovsky & Perkovsky 2005, Tolkanitz world wide. Despite this, they are comparatively et al. 2005a,b, Engel & Perkovsky 2006a—c, Per- well studied, largely stimulated by the authorita- kovsky 2006a,b, Simutnik & Perkovsky 2006, tive monograph ofMeinander (1972). Six species Zhantiev 2006). Sixteen insect orders and about a ofthe family have been described from Baltic am- hundred families have now been reported from ber (see list in Engel 2004), belonging to five gen- Rovno amber (Perkovsky et al. 2003b, Engel & era, three of which are extinct: Archiconio— Perkovsky 2006a, Perkovsky 2006a). This in- compsa Enderlein, 1910, Archiconis Enderlein, cludes, however, no species of Neuroptera. The 1930, Heminiphetia Enderlein, 1930, all three are amber is chemically identical with Baltic amber monotypic. (Kosmowska-Ceranowicz 1999), and both are The presence of the Baltic amber Archi— considered to be roughly contemporaneous, Late coniocompsa prisca in Rovno amber is not sur- 26 Kupryjanowicz & Makarkin ° ENTOMOL. FENNICA Vol. 19 prising. Species ofDolichopodidae (Diptera) and senschaftliches Zentrum der Universitat Got- Rhinoterrnitidae (Isoptera) have been identified tingen [=Geoscience Centre of the University of in common between Rovno and Baltic ambers Gottingen], Germamy; MZ, Muzeum Ziemi (Grichanov 2000, Perkovsky et al. 2007). Fur- Polskiej Akademii Nauk [=Museum of the Earth ther, 74% of ant species and all 6 species of ofthe Polish Academy ofSciences], Warsaw, Po- Psocoptera recorded from Rovno amber were land. previously described from Baltic amber (Dlussky & Perkovsky 2002, Engel & Perkovsky 2006b,c). Such shared species in other insect 3. Systematic paleontology families are not yet known, but most of these are represented in Rovno amber by few species or 3.1. Archiconiocompsa prisca Enderlein, 1910 have not yet been closely examined. The relation- (Figs 1—4) ship between the Baltic and Rovno amber insect faunas is therefore only beginning to be evident Archiconiocompsa prisca Enderlein, 1910: 676, as the Rovno assemblage becomes better known. figs 1—4 (original description); Enderlein 1930: Nevertheless, it is currently apparent that the 101 (keyed); Meinander 1972: 34 (systematic po- Rovno amber insect assemblage is distinct from sition); Meinander 1975: 53 (taxonomic re- that of Baltic amber by differing relative abun- marks); Meinander 1979: 20, 23 (systematic po- dances oforders, families and groups within fam- sition, biogeography); Keilbach 1982: 284 ilies (Perkovsky et al. 2003a,b, Engel & Perkov- (listed); Nel 1990: 343 (listed); Spahr 1992: 71 sky 2006a, Perkovsky et al. 2007). (listed); Weitschat & Wichard 1998: 146, pl. 53, figs c, e (photographs of two additional speci- mens); Dobosz & Krzeminski 2000: 220 (listed); 2. Material and methods Engel 2004: 134 (listed, systematic position). Hololype (female): Number unknown, earlier The material examined comes from the Klesov deposited “in the collection of Professor Dr. R. locality, about 90 km NNE of Rovno in the Klebs” in Konigsberg [=Kaliningrad], now lost Rovno Region, Ukraine. The specimen was do- or possibly destroyed, not found in the part ofhis nated to the Museum of the Earth by Andrzej collection preserved in the GZG (Ch. Neumann, Wiszniewski (A.Wiszniewski collection), and M. Reich, pers. comm.). Baltic amber (precise lo- prepared for this study by Janusz Kupryjanowicz. cality collected unknown). Late Eocene. It is embedded in a translucent lump of amber Additional material (apparently females): (1) with measurements 14 x 12 x 5 mm. There are no No. 5907, deposited in the SZG, labelled “Phys. syninclusions. Photographs and measurements Oek. Ges. [=Physikalisch—Okonomischen Ge- were done using a Zeiss SV 11 microscope. sellschaft, Konigsberg]/ Nr. 9267./ 11.1. Nr. 4.”; Terminology mainly follows Meinander “5907/ Coniopterix [sic]/ 5277-8”. Baltic amber (1972). Abbreviations used in the text and figures (precise locality collected unknown); (2) No. MZ are: A1, A2, 1st and 2nd anal veins (A); Cul, 24667, deposited in the MZ. Ukraine: Rovno Cu2, anterior and posterior branches of the [=Rivne] Region: Klesov [=Klesiv] locality cubital vein (Cu); M1+2, M3+4, branches of the [51.315N 26.907E] (Rovno amber). Late Eo- medial vein (M); R1, anterior branch ofthe radial cene. vein (R); R2+3, R3+4, branches ofthe radial sec- Description. (Rovno specimen): Body, ap- tor (Rs); Sc1, Sc2, anterior and posterior branches pendages fuscous. Head with very large eyes of the subcostal vein (Sc). Crossveins are desig- (Fig. 2a); vertex not especially prominent, cove- nated after the longitudinal veins which they con- red with rather scarce, fine hairs. Antennae short, nect, and numbered in sequence from the wing 16-segmented; scape, pedicel size similar, length base (if more than one crossvein between a vein ca. 1.5 times width, stouter than other segments; pair is present), e.g., 2m—cu1, distal crossvein 1st segment of flagellum (3rd antennal segment) connecting M and Cu1. longer than other flagellar segments, length ca. Institutional abbreviations: GZG, Geowis- 2.2 times width; flagellar segments increasingly ENTOMOL. FENNICA Vol. 19 - Archiconiocompsaprisca in Rovno amber 27 . i . I ; , vm 0.3 mm pllcv% Fig. 2. Archiconiocompsa pn'sca, Rovno amber speci- men MZ 24667. — a., Head. — b. Abdomen (lateral Fig. 1 . Archiconiocompsa pn'sca, Rovno amber speci- v to ix, — — view). mxpl, maxillary palpus; plic, plicaturae; men MZ 24667. a. Left lateral view. b. Right lateral 5th to 9th sternites. view. shorter, wider toward apex; terminal flagellomere site basal sc-r. Crossvein-like part of Sc2 meeting tapering. Antennae covered with moderately R1 distadrl-rs. Basal sc-r very short. Sc2 slightly long, dense hairs. Terminal segment ofmaxillary curved toward Scl, but apically separate. Origin palps much longer, broader than others. Structu- ofRs at proximal 1/3th ofwing length. Rs basally res of thorax poorly visible by preservation, but sinuous with distinct knee (bend, as in Meinander as evident appear normal for family (Fig. 3b). 1972) at lrs-m; division into R2+3, R4+5 shifted Legs ofusual morphology for family, slender; fe- distally, rl-rs joining Rs strongly proximad this mur of fore leg stouter than other leg segments. fork. R2+3, R4+5 rather short, broadly spaced, Femur, tibia offore leg much shorter than those of angle between them almost 90 degrees. lrs-m at mid, hind legs. All femora covered with short, knee of Rs not detected, but crossvein-like weak sparse setae; tibiae with longer, denser setae. Tar- structure visible slightly distad fork of M; 2rs-m si five-segmented, all basitarsi longest of tarso- long, nearly opposite rl-rs. M coalescent with R meres, as long as, or slightly longer than four for short distance or connecting with it by very other tarsomeres together. Abdomen covered (at short crossvein proximally (this portion not most) with microtrichia. Abdominal plicaturae clearly visible; possibly former variant in left on third to sixth sternites, most prominent on fifth wing, latter in right), deeply bifurcate distally, sternite (Fig. 2b). Seventh segment relatively with branches very long, relatively closely long, eighth segment appearing very short (indis- spaced; long setae on two large thickenings ofM. tinct preservation). Genital structures suggests lm-cul very short, connecting M, Cul slightly specimen female, but not clearly visible by clou- distal to fork of Cu; 2m—cu1 very strong, short, dy amber. slightly proximad fork of M. Cu dividing into Forewing (Fig. 3). Length 3.3 mm, maximum Cul, Cu2 close to wing base; cul-cu2 short, width 1.2 mm. Sc parallel to costal margin. Two
Recommended publications
  • Ants and the Fossil Record
    EN58CH30-LaPolla ARI 28 November 2012 16:49 Ants and the Fossil Record John S. LaPolla,1,∗ Gennady M. Dlussky,2 and Vincent Perrichot3 1Department of Biological Sciences, Towson University, Towson, Maryland 21252; email: [email protected] 2Department of Evolution, Biological Faculty, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Vorobjovy gory, 119992, Moscow, Russia; email: [email protected] 3Laboratoire Geosciences´ & Observatoire des Sciences de l’Univers de Rennes, Universite´ Rennes 1, 35042 Rennes, France; email: [email protected] Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2013. 58:609–30 Keywords by University of Barcelona on 09/10/13. For personal use only. The Annual Review of Entomology is online at Armaniidae, Cretaceous, Eusocial, Formicidae, Insect, Sphecomyrminae ento.annualreviews.org This article’s doi: Abstract Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2013.58:609-630. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org 10.1146/annurev-ento-120710-100600 The dominance of ants in the terrestrial biosphere has few equals among Copyright c 2013 by Annual Reviews. animals today, but this was not always the case. The oldest ants appear in the All rights reserved fossil record 100 million years ago, but given the scarcity of their fossils, it ∗ Corresponding author is presumed they were relatively minor components of Mesozoic insect life. The ant fossil record consists of two primary types of fossils, each with inher- ent biases: as imprints in rock and as inclusions in fossilized resins (amber). New imaging technology allows ancient ant fossils to be examined in ways never before possible. This is particularly helpful because it can be difficult to distinguish true ants from non-ants in Mesozoic fossils.
    [Show full text]
  • Fossil Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): Ancient Diversity and the Rise of Modern Lineages
    Myrmecological News 24 1-30 Vienna, March 2017 Fossil ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): ancient diversity and the rise of modern lineages Phillip BARDEN Abstract The ant fossil record is summarized with special reference to the earliest ants, first occurrences of modern lineages, and the utility of paleontological data in reconstructing evolutionary history. During the Cretaceous, from approximately 100 to 78 million years ago, only two species are definitively assignable to extant subfamilies – all putative crown group ants from this period are discussed. Among the earliest ants known are unexpectedly diverse and highly social stem- group lineages, however these stem ants do not persist into the Cenozoic. Following the Cretaceous-Paleogene boun- dary, all well preserved ants are assignable to crown Formicidae; the appearance of crown ants in the fossil record is summarized at the subfamilial and generic level. Generally, the taxonomic composition of Cenozoic ant fossil communi- ties mirrors Recent ecosystems with the "big four" subfamilies Dolichoderinae, Formicinae, Myrmicinae, and Ponerinae comprising most faunal abundance. As reviewed by other authors, ants increase in abundance dramatically from the Eocene through the Miocene. Proximate drivers relating to the "rise of the ants" are discussed, as the majority of this increase is due to a handful of highly dominant species. In addition, instances of congruence and conflict with molecular- based divergence estimates are noted, and distinct "ghost" lineages are interpreted. The ant fossil record is a valuable resource comparable to other groups with extensive fossil species: There are approximately as many described fossil ant species as there are fossil dinosaurs. The incorporation of paleontological data into neontological inquiries can only seek to improve the accuracy and scale of generated hypotheses.
    [Show full text]
  • Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and Matsucoccids (Homoptera: Matsucoccidae) in Rovno Amber
    Russian Entomol. J. 15(4):419–420 © RUSSIAN ENTOMOLOGICAL JOURNAL, 2006 First occurrence of syninclusion of ants Ctenobethylus goepperti (Mayr) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and matsucoccids (Homoptera: Matsucoccidae) in Rovno amber Ïåðâàÿ íàõîäêà ñèíèíêëþçà ìóðàâüåâ Ctenobethylus goepperti (Mayr) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) è ìàòöóêîêöèä (Homoptera: Matsucoccidae) â ðîâåíñêîì ÿíòàðå E. E. Perkovsky Å.Å. Ïåðêîâñêèé Shmalhausen Institute of Zoology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Bogdan Khmelnitsky Str., 15 Kiev 01601, Ukraine. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Институт зоологии им. И.И. Шмальгаузена НАН Украины, ул. БогданаХмельницкого 15, Киев 01601, Украина. KEYWORDS: Homoptera, Coccoidea, Matsucoccidae, Hymenoptera, Formicidae, amber, palaentology КЛЮЧЕВЫЕ СЛОВА: Homoptera, Coccoidea, Matsucoccidae, Hymenoptera, Formicidae, янтарь, палеонтология ABSTRACT. Described is the first syninclusion of the Schmalhausen Institute of Zoology in 2001–2002 at dolichoderine ant Ctenobethylus goepperti (Mayr) (two the factory “Ukramber” (Rovno). The Baltic representa- workers) and scale insect Matsucoccus (male and fe- tive collection has been selected directly at the factory male) in Rovno amber. in Yantarny in June 1993 by the team of the Arthropoda Laboratory, Paleontological Institute, Moscow. It is РЕЗЮМЕ. Описан первый сининклюз долиходе- currently kept at the Booth Museum of Natural History рины Ctenobethylus goepperti (Mayr) (двое рабочих) (Brighton, England) and is further referred to as Bright- и кокциды Matsucoccus (самец и самка) в ровенс- on coll. Totally, the Rovno coll. comprises 1256 remains ком янтаре. of Arthropoda (907 insects), and the Brighton coll. 757 inclusions (487 insects). Syninclusions (joint fossilisation of different organ- The first Rovno amber syninclusion that presents isms in a piece of amber) is known as the important two worker ants C.
    [Show full text]
  • Zootaxa, Fossil Ants of the Genus Gesomyrmex Mayr
    Zootaxa 2031: 1–20 (2009) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2009 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Fossil ants of the genus Gesomyrmex Mayr (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) from the Eocene of Europe and remarks on the evolution of arboreal ant communities GENNADY M. DLUSSKY1, TORSTEN WAPPLER2 & SONJA WEDMANN3 1Department of Evolution, Biological Faculty, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University. Vorobjovy gory, 119992, Moscow, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] 2Steinmann Institut für Geologie, Mineralogie, Paläontologie, Universität Bonn, Nussallee 8, D-53115 Bonn, Germany. E-mail: [email protected] 3Forschungsstation Grube Messel, Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, Markstraße 35, D-64409 Messel, Germany. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The formicid genus Gesomyrmex is reviewed and several new species are described from the middle Eocene (about 47 Ma) of Grube Messel, Germany, and from the middle Eocene (about 43 Ma) of Eckfeld maar, Germany. The new taxa are Gesomyrmex curiosus n. sp., Gesomyrmex breviceps n. sp., and Gesomyrmex pulcher n. sp. from Messel, and Gesomyrmex flavescens n. sp., and Gesomyrmex germanicus n. sp. from Eckfeld maar. Two previosly described Oligocene species must be excluded from Gesomyrmex. Former G. expectans Théobald, 1937 is transferred to Eoformica expectans (Théobald, 1937) (comb. nov.), and former G. mi egi Théobald, 1937 has to be considered as Formicidae incertae sedis (comb. nov.). A key to the living and fossil reproductive female caste (gyne) of the genus Gesomyrmex is provided. Given the fossil records of Gesomyrmex hoernesi Mayr, 1868 from different European amber deposits the presence of this genus in Europe during the Eocene is well established.
    [Show full text]
  • Cauc Ent Bull 1(1).Indd
    Кавказский энтомол. бюллетень 1(1): 89−94 © CAUCASIAN ENTOMOLOGICAL BULL. 2005 Система таксона Bothriomyrmex Emery, 1869 sensu lato (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) и близких родов The system of taxon Bothriomyrmex Emery, 1869 sensu lato (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and relatives genera Д.А. Дубовиков D.A. Dubovikoff Биолого-почвенный факультет, Санкт-Петербургский университет, 7/9 Университетская наб., г. С.-Петербург 199034 Россия. E- mail: [email protected]. Department of Entomology, Faculty of Biology and Soil Sciences, Saint Petersburg State University, 7/9 Universiteskaya Nab., St. Petersburg 199034 Russia. Ключевые слова: Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Iridomyrmecini trib. n., Iridomyrmecina subtrib. n., Bothriomyrmecina subtrib. n., Bothriomyrmex, Chronoxenus, Arnoldius gen. n., система. Key words: Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Iridomyrmecini trib. n., Iridomyrmecina subtrib. n., Bothriomyrmecina subtr. n., Bothriomyrmex, Chronoxenus, Arnoldius gen. n., system. Резюме. Система Bothriomyrmex, sensu lato дол- Abstract. The system ofBothriomyrmex sensu lato was гое время оставалась неясной. В предлагаемой статье uncertain for a long time. In this article all Palearctic species все палеарктические виды, а также известный толь- with known only from Costa Rica B. paradoxus Dubovikov ко из Коста-Рики B. paradoxus Dubovikov et Longino et Longino [Dubovikov, Longino, 2004], are considered to [Dubovikoff, Longino, 2004], рассматриваются в преде- be among species of genus Bothriomyrmex Emery, 1869 лах рода Bothriomyrmex Emery, 1869, s. str. (формула s.str. (palp formula - 4:3 - 4 maxillary segments, 3 - labial, щупиков 4:3 - 4 максилярных и 3 лабиальных члени- the forewing of female with closed discoidal cell); Oriental ка, переднее крыло самок с замкнутой дискоидальной species - belong to genus Chronoxenus Santschi, 1919 stat. ячейкой); индо-малайские виды - в пределах рода n.
    [Show full text]
  • Hymenoptera, Formicidae: Amblyoponinae, Ectatomminae, Ponerinae) of Grube Messel, Germany: High Biodiversity in the Eocene G
    Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, Vol. 10, Issue 4, December 2012, 725–753 The poneromorph ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae: Amblyoponinae, Ectatomminae, Ponerinae) of Grube Messel, Germany: high biodiversity in the Eocene G. M. Dlusskya∗ and S. Wedmannb aDepartment of Evolution, Biological Faculty, M.V.Lomonosov Moscow State University, Vorobjovy gory, 119992, Moscow, Russia; bForschungsstation Grube Messel, Senckenberg Forschungsinstitut und Naturmuseum, Markstraße 35, D-64409, Messel, Germany (Received 17 September 2010; accepted 27 March 2011; printed 5 December 2012) Ants are a very successful group among insects, but the course of evolution of their biodiversity is still unclear. This study sheds light on ant diversification during the Eocene. Analysis of the ant taphocoenosis of the fossil site Grube Messel, Germany (47 Ma) yielded three poneromorph subfamilies and 22 new species in six genera, four of which are new: Pseudectatomma gen. nov., Cephalopone gen. nov., Cyrtopone gen. nov. and Messelepone gen. nov. Only one extant genus, Pachycondyla, is present in the taphocoenosis from Messel. The high diversity of poneromorph ants from Messel is very striking in comparison with middle to late Eocene European ambers. A significantly lower proportion of species in ambers can be assigned to poneromorph ants, and fewer poneromorph species are known from European ambers than from Messel. A possible gradual decline of the diversity of poneromorphs from the Eocene to the Miocene seems to be detectable worldwide. These insights are discussed in the context of the morphology and ecology of Poneromorpha and Formicomorpha. The proportion of ant castes in amber seems to indicate that already during the Eocene poneromorphs inhabited preferably litter and soil, whereas formicomorphs preferred the arboreal realm.
    [Show full text]
  • Rovno Amber Fauna: a Preliminary Report
    Acta zoologica cracoviensia, 46(suppl.– Fossil Insects): 423-430, Kraków, 15 Oct., 2003 Rovno amber fauna: a preliminary report Evgeny E. PERKOVSKY, Vladimir Yu. ZOSIMOVICH and Anatolij Yu. VLASKIN Received: Feb. 25, 2002 Accepted for publication: Jan. 10, 2003 PERKOVSKY E. E., ZOSIMOVICH V. Yu., VLASKIN A. Yu. 2003. Rovno amber fauna: a preliminary report. Acta zoologica cracoviensia, 46(suppl.– Fossil Insects): 423-430. Abstract. The conflicting views of Rovno amber being allochthonous, having been trans- ported to the Pripyat area during the Eocene from the north across the sea and thus deriv- ing from the same region as Baltic amber versus suggested local origins within the Ukrainian Crystalline Shield must have been tested by a comparison of inclusions of the Rovno and other ambers. The study of Rovno ants confirms Rovno amber being auto- chthonous. Key words. Rovno amber, new amber fauna, Eocene. Evgeny E. PERKOVSKY, Institute of Zoology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine in Kiev, 15 B. Khmelnitsky Street, Kiev 01-601 Ukraine. E-mail: [email protected] Vladimir Yu. ZOSIMOVICH, Institute of Geological Sciences of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine in Kiev, 55b O. Gonchar Street, Kiev 01-054 Ukraine. Anatolij Yu. VLASKIN, Institute of Zoology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine in Kiev, 15 B. Khmelnitsky Street, Kiev 01-601 Ukraine. I. INTRODUCTION An amber chemically identical to the dominating Baltic variety, succinite, is widespread in the Pripyat River basin in Byelorussia and the Ukraine, as pointed out by KATINAS (1987) and KOS- MOWSKA-CERANOWICZ (1999). The amber area also covers southeast Poland (KOSMOWSKA-CERA- NOWICZ et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Species (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Formicinae) in Late Eocene Rovno Amber
    JHR 82: 237–251 (2021) doi: 10.3897/jhr.82.64599 RESEARCH ARTICLE https://jhr.pensoft.net Formica species (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Formicinae) in late Eocene Rovno amber Alexander G. Radchenko1, Evgeny E. Perkovsky1, Dmitry V. Vasilenko2,3 1 Schmalhausen Institute of zoology of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kiev, 01030, Ukraine 2 Bo- rissiak Paleontological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 117647, Russia 3 Cherepovets State University, Cherepovets, 162600, Russia Corresponding author: Alexander G. Radchenko ([email protected]) Academic editor: F.H. Garcia | Received 18 February 2021 | Accepted 7 April 2021 | Published 29 April 2021 http://zoobank.org/D68193F7-DFC4-489E-BE9F-4E3DD3E14C36 Citation: Radchenko AG, Perkovsky EE, Vasilenko DV (2021) Formica species (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Formicinae) in late Eocene Rovno amber. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 82: 237–251. https://doi.org/10.3897/ jhr.82.64599 Abstract A new species, Formica ribbeckei Radchenko & Perkovsky, sp. nov., is described based on four workers from late Eocene Rovno amber (Ukraine). It most resembles F. flori Mayr, 1868 but differs from the latter mainly by the 5-segmented maxillary palps with the preapical segment subequal in length to the apical one, and by the shorter first funicular segment. Fossil F. luteola Presl, 1822, F. trigona Presl, 1822, F. mac- rognatha Presl, 1822 and F. quadrata Holl, 1829 are considered incertae sedis in Formicidae. Thus, ten valid Formica Linnaeus, 1758 species (including F. ribbeckei) are known now from late Eocene European ambers. The diversity of Formica in the early and middle Eocene deposits of Eurasia and North America is considered. It is assumed that the genus Formica most likely arose in the early Eocene.
    [Show full text]
  • Ants (Insecta: Vespida: Formicidae) in the Upper Eocene Amber of Central and Eastern Europe G
    ISSN 0031-0301, Paleontological Journal, 2009, Vol. 43, No. 9, pp. 1024–1042. © Pleiades Publishing, Ltd., 2009. Ants (Insecta: Vespida: Formicidae) in the Upper Eocene Amber of Central and Eastern Europe G. M. Dlusskya and A. P. Rasnitsynb, c aMoscow State University, Biological Faculty, Moscow, 119899 Russia e-mail: [email protected] bBorissiak Paleontological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, ul. Profsoyuznaya 123, 117868 Moscow, Russia cNatural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK e-mail: [email protected] Received August 5, 2008 Abstract—A total of 5754 ant inclusions from 13 European collections of Baltic, Bitterfeld, Rovno, and Scan- dinavian ambers are studied and identified as belonging to 147 species, 57 genera, and 9 subfamilies. The tax- onomic composition and relative species abundances of species in representative collections are analyzed and considerable differences between the above four types of amber are shown. These differences appear to reflect differences in ecological conditions rather than in age. The Baltic and Bitterfeld ant assemblages are shown to be most similar, the Scandinavian assemblage turns out to be most dissimilar to these, and the Rovno assem- blage is shown to be intermediate. DOI: 10.1134/S0031030109090056 Key words: Baltic amber, Bitterfeld amber, Rovno amber, Scandinavian amber, Formicidae, Eocene, Europe. INTRODUCTION became the Bitterfeld amber, discovered in the Miocene deposits near the town of Bitterfeld (Saxony- The Baltic and similar ambers are widespread on the Anhalt, Germany) and originally dated as Miocene territories of the Central and Eastern Europe and for a (Barthel and Hetzer, 1982). Later it was identified as long time attracted attention of geologists, entomolo- redeposited.
    [Show full text]
  • "An Overview of the Species and Ecological Diversity of Ants"
    An Overview of the Advanced article Species and Ecological Article Contents . Introduction Diversity of Ants . Origin and Diversification of Ants Through Time . Taxonomic Diversity . Biogeography and Diversity Patterns of Ants Benoit Gue´nard, Biodiversity and biocomplexity Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and . Ecological Diversity of Ants Technology, Onna-son, Okinawa, Japan . Conclusion Online posting date: 15th May 2013 Since their appearance during the Cretaceous, ants have approximately 12 500 species of ants, all eusocial, have diversified to become today the most diverse group of been described and hundreds of new species are described social insects and one of the most influential groups of each year. Ant biologists estimate that the Formicidae organisms on the planet. More than 12 500 species of ants family could include no less than 20 000 species (Ho¨lldobler and Wilson, 1990). In comparison, there are ‘only’ are presently described, distributed within 21 sub- approximately 3000 termite species (Engel et al., 2009), families, with a large majority of the species belonging to 2000 species of social bees (8% of the total bees) and 1100 only four subfamilies. Ants are present in almost all ter- social wasp species (James Carpenter, personal communi- restrial ecosystems, their peak of diversity is found within cation) known. See also: Ecology and Social Organisation the tropical regions, and ant richness tends to decline of Bees both with increasing latitude and altitude. In most eco- In the first part of this article the diversity of ants from systems the ecological importance of ants, involved in geologic times to the present is reviewed, focusing on four numerous interactions with organisms ranging from taxonomically dominant groups and their spatial distri- bacteria, plants, fungi, arthropods to vertebrates, plays a bution.
    [Show full text]
  • Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh
    Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh http://journals.cambridge.org/TRE Additional services for Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Email alerts: Click here Subscriptions: Click here Commercial reprints: Click here Terms of use : Click here The wasps, bees and ants (Insecta: Vespida=Hymenoptera) from the Insect Limestone (Late Eocene) of the Isle of Wight, UK Alexander V. Antropov, Sergey A. Belokobylskij, Stephen G. Compton, Gennady M. Dlussky, Andrey I. Khalaim, Victor A. Kolyada, Mikhail A. Kozlov, Ksenia S. Perlieva and Alexandr P. Rasnitsyn Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh / Volume 104 / Issue 3-4 / May 2014, pp 335 - 446 DOI: 10.1017/S1755691014000103, Published online: 30 May 2014 Link to this article: http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S1755691014000103 How to cite this article: Alexander V. Antropov, Sergey A. Belokobylskij, Stephen G. Compton, Gennady M. Dlussky, Andrey I. Khalaim, Victor A. Kolyada, Mikhail A. Kozlov, Ksenia S. Perlieva and Alexandr P. Rasnitsyn (2014). The wasps, bees and ants (Insecta: Vespida=Hymenoptera) from the Insect Limestone (Late Eocene) of the Isle of Wight, UK . Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 104, pp 335-446 doi:10.1017/S1755691014000103 Request Permissions : Click here Downloaded from http://journals.cambridge.org/TRE, IP address: 146.231.3.1 on 31 Jul 2014 Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 104, 335–446, 2014 (for 2013) The wasps, bees and ants (Insecta: Vespida ¼ Hymenoptera) from the Insect Limestone (Late Eocene) of the Isle of Wight, UK Alexander V.
    [Show full text]
  • Synonymic List of Neotropical Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)
    BIOTA COLOMBIANA Special Issue: List of Neotropical Ants Número monográfico: Lista de las hormigas neotropicales Fernando Fernández Sebastián Sendoya Volumen 5 - Número 1 (monográfico), Junio de 2004 Instituto de Ciencias Naturales Biota Colombiana 5 (1) 3 -105, 2004 Synonymic list of Neotropical ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Fernando Fernández1 and Sebastián Sendoya2 1Profesor Asociado, Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, AA 7495, Bogotá D.C, Colombia. [email protected] 2 Programa de Becas ABC, Sistema de Información en Biodiversidad y Proyecto Atlas de la Biodiversidad de Colombia, Instituto Alexander von Humboldt. [email protected] Key words: Formicidae, Ants, Taxa list, Neotropical Region, Synopsis Introduction Ant Phylogeny Ants are conspicuous and dominant all over the All ants belong to the family Formicidae, in the superfamily globe. Their diversity and abundance both peak in the tro- Vespoidea, within the order Hymenoptera. The most widely pical regions of the world and gradually decline towards accepted phylogentic schemes for the superfamily temperate latitudes. Nonetheless, certain species such as Vespoidea place the ants as a sister group to Vespidae + Formica can be locally abundant in some temperate Scoliidae (Brother & Carpenter 1993; Brothers 1999). countries. In the tropical and subtropical regions numerous Numerous studies have demonstrated the monophyletic species have been described, but many more remain to be nature of ants (Bolton 1994, 2003; Fernández 2003). Among discovered. Multiple studies have shown that ants represent the most widely accepted characters used to define ants as a high percentage of the biomass and individual count in a group are the presence of a metapleural gland in females canopy forests.
    [Show full text]