Arxiv:2105.00360V2 [Gr-Qc] 5 Aug 2021
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Semiclassical and quantum features of the Bianchi I cosmology in the polymer representation Eleonora Giovannetti,1, ∗ Giovanni Montani,1, 2, y and Silvia Schiattarella1, z 1Physics Department, \Sapienza" University of Rome, P.le Aldo Moro 5, 00185 (Roma), Italy 2ENEA, FSN-FUSPHY-TSM, R.C. Frascati, Via E. Fermi 45, 00044 Frascati, Italy (Dated: August 9, 2021) We analyze the Bianchi I cosmology in the presence of a massless scalar field and describe its dynamics via a semiclassical and quantum polymer approach. We investigate the morphology of the emerging Big Bounce by adopting three different sets of configurational variables: the natural Ashtekar connections, a set of anisotropic volume-like coordinates and the Universe volume plus two anisotropy coordinates (the latter two sets of variables would coincide in the case of an isotropic Universe). In the semiclassical analysis we demonstrate that the value of the critical matter energy density depends on the Cauchy problem for the dynamics when adopting the Ashtekar connections or the anisotropic volume-like coordinates. On the contrary, when the Universe volume itself is considered as a configurational coordinate, we are able to derive a polymer-modified Friedmann equation for the Bianchi I model, from which the proper expression of the critical energy density can be derived. In particular, this analysis shows that the Big Bounce has a universal nature (i.e. its critical energy density has a maximum value fixed by fundamental constants and the Immirzi parameter only) when defining the Universe volume on the polymer lattice. Then, a cosmological constant is included in the Ashtekar connections' formulation and some interesting results are men- tioned making a comparison between the synchronous dynamics and that one when the scalar field is taken as a relational time. From a pure quantum point of view, we investigate the Bianchi I dynam- ics only in terms of the Ashtekar connections, the privileged variables as dictated by Loop Quantum Gravity. We apply the Arnowitt-Deser-Misner reduction of the variational principle and then we quantize the system. We study the resulting Schr¨odingerdynamics, stressing that the behavior of the wave packet peak over time singles out common features with the semiclassical trajectories, confirming the non-universal character of the emerging Big Bounce also on a quantum level. I. INTRODUCTION discrete spectrum [6, 7]. In the first approach, the turn- ing point in the past depends on the wave packet profile One of the most relevant phenomenological implica- as fixed at a given instant of time and also the critical tions of Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG) [1, 2] is certainly energy density can approach very large values [2, 17]. In the emergence of a Big Bounce in the quantum dynam- the dynamical reformulation, both the Big Bounce and ics of the isotropic Universe [3{13]. Despite the cosmo- the critical energy density become intrinsic features of logical implementation of the formalism of the full the- the Universe, namely fixed by the fundamental constants ory present some limitations, especially concerning the and parameters only [6]. From the point of view of the proper assessment of the SU(2) symmetry (see [14{16]), adopted configurational variables, the difference can be the discreteness of the geometrical operator (area and summarized in the use of the pure Ashtekar connection volume) spectra is at the ground of a deep revision in in the kinematical spectrum case or the Universe vol- the concept of the early Universe. ume when an intrinsic cut-off comes out. With respect Actually, the emergence of a Big Bounce and the cor- to this dualism of possible representations, see the dis- responding existence of a cut-off for the matter energy cussion in [13] where the same question is addressed in Polymer Quantum Mechanics (PQM) by tracing a close arXiv:2105.00360v2 [gr-qc] 5 Aug 2021 density take place in their own evidence essentially on a semiclassical level: the mean value of localized wave parallelism with Loop Quantum Cosmology (LQC). In- packets follows a revised dynamics in which the singular- deed, the polymer approach [18, 19] is the most simple ity is removed. On this level, the most intriguing open treatment able to provide insights on the emergence of question concerns the specific morphology of this semi- a bouncing cosmology without entering the subtleties of classical turning point in the past of the present Universe. LQG and LQC, but reliably retaining the same informa- In fact, two possible representations are possible: one im- tion of the latter. posing a kinematical cut-off on the minimal area element [5] and the other one assigning the same cut-off on a dy- Here, we apply PQM to the Bianchi I model in the namical level, i.e. involving the cosmic scale factor in the presence of a massless scalar field and we explore the dynamics in different sets of configurational variables by applying both the so-called semiclassical approach and the purely quantum one [19]. We compare the use of the ∗ [email protected] natural Ashtekar connections to the implementation of y [email protected] two different sets of volume-like variables (the anisotropic z [email protected] volume-like coordinates as well as the Universe volume 2 plus two anisotropies), following the LQC formulation wave packets seems to be well-grounded on a quantum in [20, 21]. On a semiclassical level we show that, when level too. PQM is applied to the anisotropic Universe dynamics, the The paper is structured as follows. In Sec. II the Big Bounce as an intrinsic feature is reached only in the theory of PQM is introduced. In Sec. III the main pure volume formulation, while both in the anisotropic results obtained by describing the Friedmann-Lemaitre- volume-like coordinates and in the Ashtekar connections Robertson-Walker (FLRW) model in the polymer picture the resulting bouncing cosmology depends on the initial are presented, providing the analyses in the Ashtekar conditions on the system. This result suggests that it is variables and in the volume ones into two subsections. strictly the use of the Universe volume coordinate that In Sec. IV the Hamiltonian formulation of the Bianchi ensures an intrinsic cut-off, while the geometrical dimen- I model in the Ashtekar variables is described, in order sions of the variables described as discrete on the poly- to introduce the original part of the paper developed in mer lattice is only linked to the the determination of Secc. V-VIII. In particular, in Secc. V and VI it is whether or not the Big Bounce exists (see [22] where it solved the semiclassical polymer dynamics of the Bianchi is shown that the Bianchi I and IX models in the Misner I model in the Ashtekar variables and in the two sets variables are still singular in the polymer formulation). of volume-like variables respectively, then in Sec. VII Moreover, the analysis in the Universe volume formula- a inflation-like dynamics is analyzed thanks to the in- tion is strongly supported by the derivation of a polymer- troduction of a positive cosmological constant when the modified Friedmann equation in the anisotropic case, Ashtekar variables are taken into account. Furthermore, from which we can analyze the expression of the proper in the same set a full quantum treatment is introduced energy density at the Bounce, including the anisotropy in Sec. VIII using a Scr¨odinger-like formalism. Finally, contribution to the standard matter energy density term. in Sec. IX some concluding remarks are commented. Then, we provide a discussion of the semiclassical poly- mer dynamics also in the presence of a cosmological con- stant term, introduced to mimic an inflation-like evolu- II. POLYMER QUANTUM MECHANICS tion [23]). It is outlined a crucial difference in the dy- namical picture if we adopt the relational time variable As a first step, we introduce the polymer quantiza- associated to the scalar field or the synchronous one. Us- tion of a system, which is a non-equivalent representation ing the scalar field as a clock, we show the emergence of of the quantum mechanics with respect to the standard a peculiar divergence of the Universe volume at specific Schr¨odingerone (see [19]). This formulation is based instants, that is removed at all in the synchronous time on the assumption that one or more variables of the representation (for the discussion of a similar behavior phase space are discretized. Hence, in this approach it is see [12, 24]). Considering the semiclassical dynamics as not possible to defineq ^ andp ^ as operators at the same resembling the trajectory of the quantum mean values time. However, the power of this alternative quantum (in the spirit of the Ehrenfest theorem [25]), this feature approach is the possibility to describe cut-off physics ef- seems to be of interest. Indeed, once the scalar field has fects through a simple formalism and this is particularly been fixed as the relational time in the quantum theory, useful in the cosmological setting, where the generalized it is the only legitimated clock so the peculiarity of the coordinates are identified with the cosmic scale factors. Universe evolution would acquire a physical meaning. First of all, we introduce a set of abstract kets jµi with µ 2 IR and fix the inner product as Regarding the proper application of PQM, we analyze the evolution of the Bianchi I cosmology only limiting our hµj jνi = δµν ; (1) attention to the choice of the Ashtekar connections, the privileged set in LQG. We choose the matter scalar field being δµν a Kronecker delta. This procedure defines the as a clock before quantizing by means of an Arnowitt- non-separable Hilbert space Hpoly where we can define Deser-Misner (ADM) reduction of the variational prin- two fundamental operators: the label operator ^, whose ciple [26].