DOCSLIB.ORG

From Watershed To

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

EBMUD Ranger Virginia Northrop (left) and volunteers with Friends of Pinole Creek Watershed work to keep Pinole Creek free of trash. From Watershed to Bay As Creek to Bay Day and Coastal Cleanup Day approach on September 16, the East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD) and partners along our watersheds, waterways and San Francisco Bay invite you to join us in taking action. Environmental protection starts right here at home in our beautiful East Bay! WWW.EBMUD.COM/CLEANBAY A SPECIAL MARKETING PUBLICATION You. In a Watershed. Volunteers with the Skyline Gardens Project work to restore the Skyline Trail area of the Oakland-Berkeley hills. VISIT EBMUD’S OPEN SPACE TRAILS AND ACCESS AND WATERSHEDS Enjoy expansive open space, wildlife-viewing opportunities, About 28,000 acres of watershed lands in the East Bay hiking and equestrian trails, and volunteer opportunities provide needed protection for high quality drinking along 80 miles of East Bay trails on our lands. Shimmering water, while offering habitat for plants and animals – lake views and streams, stately redwoods, colorful as well as a natural haven for the public to enjoy. wildflowers, wooded glens and open grasslands beckon. herever your feet land in the Utility District are stewards of the watersheds nature is right here in our backyards, and needs East Bay, you’re in a watershed that surround Briones, San Pablo, Upper San our help. Join a creek organization in your EBMUD’s watershed lands — largely protected from EXPLORE! Purchase a trail permit online at W — from the ridgelines and open Leandro, Chabot and Lafayette reservoirs, community and be a weekend environmental development and human disturbance — offer important EBMUD.com. $3.00/day or $10.00/1 year. space of the Oakland-Berkeley-San Leandro as well as the land of the Pinole Valley. warrior in the East Bay’s backyard. high quality habitat for a wide variety of plant and hills, to the creeks that meander through our animal species. These reservoirs also store high quality urban neighborhoods, to the waters of the San We’ve spent almost 100 years protecting Near every creek lies an urban watershed drinking water for 1.4 million East Bay residents. OUTDOOR CLASSROOMS Francisco Bay. These are the unique lands and these lands as a critical piece of our we call home. Whether off streets, or waterways that make the East Bay home. mission to deliver high quality drinking from sinks to sewers, every drop of East EBMUD biologists monitor fish, wildlife and plant Hands-on learning provides children experiences that water to you, and we welcome you to visit, Bay water flows to the Bay. Take action species on East Bay watershed lands, conducting habitat help them to better understand what it takes to protect The beauty around us deserves protection, explore, wander, learn and volunteer. at home to protect our precious Bay. assessments, population studies and other research to inform the environment, how natural systems function and and even in this urban metropolis you can management of sensitive species on the watershed. how our drinking-water supply relates to those systems. take part in keeping our watersheds and Bay From these lands flow creeks that drain to the Read on, and learn how you can protect the EBMUD rangers work with school-age children to enhance free from harm. We at the East Bay Municipal Bay. These natural pathways remind us that environment right here in the East Bay. habitats, stabilize soils, and restore natural conditions for creeks and disturbed areas in the East Bay. Contact EBMUD at [email protected] to find out more! OPEN SPACE RESERVOIRS CREEKS HOMES STREETS SEWERS STORMDRAINS BUSINESSES WASTEWATER TREATMENT SAN FRANCISCO BAY 2 FROM WATERSHED TO BAY EBMUD.COM EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT EBMUD.COM FROM WATERSHED TO BAY 3 n the hills of the East Bay, Briones, San Pablo, Upper San Leandro, Comprised of local government agencies, the Alameda Countywide and Chabot reservoirs hold drinking water for East Bay residents. Clean Water Program works to prevent pollution to waterways ILocal runoff from precipitation, along with supplies from the throughout Alameda County. Since its inception in 1991, the Mokelumne River, is stored in East Bay reservoirs before treatment program has been monitoring the health and water quality of the and delivery to customers, and to ensure local water supplies are county’s creeks, and has worked with the community to keep available in an emergency. In a year of normal precipitation, the East the water entering the storm drains as clean as possible. Bay gets 10 percent of our water supply from local watersheds. Litter is only one among many pollutants. Cars leak fl uids on Though managed for water supply, these reservoirs each provide the road, soapy water is dumped into the gutter, and rain washes water to creeks; some year-round and some only following prolonged garden chemicals off the lawn and into storm drains; it all adds heavy rainfall. And during rain events, each reservoir helps up to a signifi cant toxic injection into our local waterways. minimize high creek fl ows by collecting local watershed rainfall, and when needed, releasing that water downstream between Some simple practices are all that are needed to keep the East storms when local creeks have capacity to transport extra fl ow. Bay’s waterscapes beautiful and healthy, and to protect plants, birds, fi sh, insects and other wildlife that live there. Picking up after your dog, controlling pests with non-toxic alternatives HOW TRASH AND POLLUTANTS END and sweeping instead of hosing down your driveway are just UP IN OUR CREEKS AND BAY a few of the actions the Clean Water Program promotes. Living in an urban environment, it’s easy to forget how closely During this year’s Coastal Cleanup Day, the Clean Water Program’s connected we are to our local creeks and the Bay. That is until focus is on litter, by encouraging residents to participate in large amounts of litter end up on our shorelines after a storm. cleanup events, raising awareness about the harm litter does Surprisingly, most of this debris originates inland on our streets. and how to prevent it. For more information and tips to keep our waterways clean visit www.CleanWaterProgram.org. Rains can wash plastic bags and cups, cigarette butts and other trash Reservoirs to Creeks off the streets and into storm drains. From there, the litter is carried directly into our creeks, wetlands and the Bay, without any treatment. LOCAL PINOLE EL SOBRANTE RICHMOND BERKELEY - OAKLAND SAN LEANDRO CREEK & Friends of Pinole Creek SPAWNERS — San Pablo The Watershed Project Friends of Five Creeks The Skyline Gardens Project Friends of Sausal Creek Friends of San Watershed (FOPCW) Neighbors Education and The mission of the Watershed Project All-volunteer Friends of Five Creeks Skyline Gardens is a combination botanical For more than 20 years, the Friends of Leandro Creek WATERSHED Pinole Creek has a watershed of Restoration Society is to inspire Bay Area communities to has worked for the health of urban survey and restoration project in the Skyline Sausal Creek has worked to restore and The Friends of San Leandro Creek is a approximately 15 square miles and is some The mission of SPAWNERS is to protect understand, appreciate and protect our environments since 1996, supporting Trail area of the Oakland–Berkeley Hills. maintain the ecology and natural beauty community group made up of dedicated GROUPS of the best steelhead habitat in the Bay the San Pablo Creek Watershed and inspire local watersheds. Volunteer workdays healthy creeks, watersheds, and nature It’s the most botanically diverse area of of the Sausal Creek Watershed in central citizens, students, and businesses interested are every 2nd Saturday on the Richmond from Berkeley to Richmond. In year-round its size (about 250 acres) in the entire Oakland. A community-based volunteer Get connected! Many volunteer- Area. Stretching from the San Pablo Bay up community appreciation and stewardship in the protection and enhancement of into the Briones hills, it includes the City of Greenway, 10 am-1 pm. Please join us in work parties, we plant, weed, and remove East Bay. Nearly 250 native species have organization, we protect sensitive habitats, San Leandro Creek, and in learning more led groups work year-round to through advocacy, education, and habitat Pinole as well a large unincorporated area restoration. Volunteer work parties are our garden and enjoy being out in nature on trash, lead walks and fun citizen-science been identifi ed so far, with ten newly monitor water quality and wildlife, restore about the creek’s ecology. Meetings are protect local creeks and watershed upstream where predominant land uses held every 3rd Saturday in El Sobrante, the Richmond Greenway for our monthly events including mapping and monitoring. discovered this year. Sponsored by the creek banks and canyons, grow and plant the second Tuesday of every other month lands. They depend on dedicated are agriculture and open space. FOPCW 9:30 am-noon. Join us at one of our riparian Second Saturday event. We plant and tend We post our lively e-news, host speakers East Bay Chapter of the California Native native plants, educate our neighbors in and are held from 7-8 p.m. Guest speakers East Bay residents like you. For works to keep that watershed healthy and habitat restoration sites to learn about to unique low impact design projects that at our fall-spring Bay Currents talk series, Plant Society in collaboration with EBMUD, environmental stewardship, and work with are often invited to our meetings. Join the opportunities and events, contact accessible.
Recommended publications
  • San Francisco Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan

    San Francisco Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan

    San Francisco Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan October 2019 Table of Contents List of Tables ............................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures.............................................................................................................................. ii Chapter 1: Governance ............................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Background ....................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Governance Team and Structure ...................................................... 1-1 1.2.1 Coordinating Committee ......................................................... 1-2 1.2.2 Stakeholders .......................................................................... 1-3 1.2.2.1 Identification of Stakeholder Types ....................... 1-4 1.2.3 Letter of Mutual Understandings Signatories .......................... 1-6 1.2.3.1 Alameda County Water District ............................. 1-6 1.2.3.2 Association of Bay Area Governments ................. 1-6 1.2.3.3 Bay Area Clean Water Agencies .......................... 1-6 1.2.3.4 Bay Area Water Supply and Conservation Agency ................................................................. 1-8 1.2.3.5 Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District .................................. 1-8 1.2.3.6 Contra Costa Water District .................................. 1-9 1.2.3.7
  • Codornices Creek Watershed Restoration Action Plan

    Codornices Creek Watershed Restoration Action Plan

    Codornices Creek Watershed Restoration Action Plan Prepared for the Urban Creeks Council By Kier Associates Fisheries and Watershed Professionals 207 Second Street, Ste. B Sausalito, CA 94965 November, 2003 The Codornices Creek watershed assessment and salmonid restoration planning project, the results of which are reported here, was funded by the Watershed Program of the California Bay-Delta Authority, through Contract No. 4600001722 between the California Department of Water Resources and the Urban Creeks Council. The Urban Creeks Council is a non-profit organization working to preserve, protect, and restore urban streams and their riparian habitat. The Urban Creeks Council may be reached at 1250 Addison Street, Ste. 107, Berkeley, CA 94702 (510- 540-6669). Table of Contents Executive Summary..................................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgements...................................................................................................................... ii Introduction Fish and stream habitat records................................................................................................. 1 Other Codornices Creek studies................................................................................................ 1 Methods: How Each Element of the Project Was Undertaken Fish population assessment methods ........................................................................................ 2 Salmonid habitat assessment methods.....................................................................................
  • Goga Wrfr.Pdf

    Goga Wrfr.Pdf

    The National Park Service Water Resources Division is responsible for providing water resources management policy and guidelines, planning, technical assistance, training, and operational support to units of the National Park System. Program areas include water rights, water resources planning, regulatory guidance and review, hydrology, water quality, watershed management, watershed studies, and aquatic ecology. Technical Reports The National Park Service disseminates the results of biological, physical, and social research through the Natural Resources Technical Report Series. Natural resources inventories and monitoring activities, scientific literature reviews, bibliographies, and proceedings of technical workshops and conferences are also disseminated through this series. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the National Park Service. Copies of this report are available from the following: National Park Service (970) 225-3500 Water Resources Division 1201 Oak Ridge Drive, Suite 250 Fort Collins, CO 80525 National Park Service (303) 969-2130 Technical Information Center Denver Service Center P.O. Box 25287 Denver, CO 80225-0287 Cover photos: Top: Golden Gate Bridge, Don Weeks Middle: Rodeo Lagoon, Joel Wagner Bottom: Crissy Field, Joel Wagner ii CONTENTS Contents, iii List of Figures, iv Executive Summary, 1 Introduction, 7 Water Resources Planning, 9 Location and Demography, 11 Description of Natural Resources, 12 Climate, 12 Physiography, 12 Geology, 13 Soils, 13
  • Friends of Five Creeks Letters Re Restoration of Codornices Creek

    Friends of Five Creeks Letters Re Restoration of Codornices Creek

    The letters below deal with F5C’s early involvement in Codornices Creek. They shed some light on challenges that faced efforts to restore our area’s only trout stream, and the role citizens played. These are by no means the whole story. Most credit for the big projects on Codornices west of San Pablo goes to the partnership of creek-restoration pioneers Carole Schemmerling, who headed the now defunct Urban Creeks Council, and consulting hydrologist Dr. Ann Riley, whose now defunct private consulting firm Watershed Restoration Institute. The two shared offices; UCC was effectively the nonprofit arm of WRI, able to receive grants and similar government support. Credit also goes to longtime environmental visionary Richard Register, who with UCC played a large role in bringing Codornices out of its pipe between 8th and 9th Streets in 1994-5. This was one of Berkeley’s pioneer “daylighting” projects. Friends of Five Creeks 1000 San Pablo Ave. Albany, CA 94706 412 7257 October 4, 1998 Mr. Ron Gervason San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board 1515 Clay St., 14th Floor Oakland, CA 94612 [email protected] Re: Triannual Review of Water Quality Control Plan of San Francisco Bay Basin Friends of Five Creeks is a grassroots organization that seeks to protect and restore creeks in Albany, California. While Albany’s natural creeks are mostly in culverts, one, Codornices, is substantially free flowing and has a small trout population. Efforts are ongoing to restore another, Cerrito Creek. We believe that the few creeks in our urbanized area that can or do support relatively natural aquatic life, especially cold-water or anadromous fish, should receive the highest possible degree of protection, including that of the Regional Water Quality Control Board.
  • Contra Costa County

    Contra Costa County

    Historical Distribution and Current Status of Steelhead/Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in Streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California Robert A. Leidy, Environmental Protection Agency, San Francisco, CA Gordon S. Becker, Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration, Oakland, CA Brett N. Harvey, John Muir Institute of the Environment, University of California, Davis, CA This report should be cited as: Leidy, R.A., G.S. Becker, B.N. Harvey. 2005. Historical distribution and current status of steelhead/rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration, Oakland, CA. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Marsh Creek Watershed Marsh Creek flows approximately 30 miles from the eastern slopes of Mt. Diablo to Suisun Bay in the northern San Francisco Estuary. Its watershed consists of about 100 square miles. The headwaters of Marsh Creek consist of numerous small, intermittent and perennial tributaries within the Black Hills. The creek drains to the northwest before abruptly turning east near Marsh Creek Springs. From Marsh Creek Springs, Marsh Creek flows in an easterly direction entering Marsh Creek Reservoir, constructed in the 1960s. The creek is largely channelized in the lower watershed, and includes a drop structure near the city of Brentwood that appears to be a complete passage barrier. Marsh Creek enters the Big Break area of the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta northeast of the city of Oakley. Marsh Creek No salmonids were observed by DFG during an April 1942 visual survey of Marsh Creek at two locations: 0.25 miles upstream from the mouth in a tidal reach, and in close proximity to a bridge four miles east of Byron (Curtis 1942).
  • Historical Status of Coho Salmon in Streams of the Urbanized San Francisco Estuary, California

    Historical Status of Coho Salmon in Streams of the Urbanized San Francisco Estuary, California

    CALIFORNIA FISH AND GAME California Fish and Game 91(4):219-254 2005 HISTORICAL STATUS OF COHO SALMON IN STREAMS OF THE URBANIZED SAN FRANCISCO ESTUARY, CALIFORNIA ROBERT A. LEIDY1 U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105 [email protected] and GORDON BECKER Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration 4179 Piedmont Avenue, Suite 325 Oakland, CA 94611 [email protected] and BRETT N. HARVEY Graduate Group in Ecology University of California Davis, CA 95616 1Corresponding author ABSTRACT The historical status of coho salmon, Oncorhynchus kisutch, was assessed in 65 watersheds surrounding the San Francisco Estuary, California. We reviewed published literature, unpublished reports, field notes, and specimens housed at museum and university collections and public agency files. In watersheds for which we found historical information for the occurrence of coho salmon, we developed a matrix of five environmental indicators to assess the probability that a stream supported habitat suitable for coho salmon. We found evidence that at least 4 of 65 Estuary watersheds (6%) historically supported coho salmon. A minimum of an additional 11 watersheds (17%) may also have supported coho salmon, but evidence is inconclusive. Coho salmon were last documented from an Estuary stream in the early-to-mid 1980s. Although broadly distributed, the environmental characteristics of streams known historically to contain coho salmon shared several characteristics. In the Estuary, coho salmon typically were members of three-to-six species assemblages of native fishes, including Pacific lamprey, Lampetra tridentata, steelhead, Oncorhynchus mykiss, California roach, Lavinia symmetricus, juvenile Sacramento sucker, Catostomus occidentalis, threespine stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus, riffle sculpin, Cottus gulosus, prickly sculpin, Cottus asper, and/or tidewater goby, Eucyclogobius newberryi.
  • Navarro Watershed Restoration Plan

    Navarro Watershed Restoration Plan

    NAVARRO WATERSHED RESTORATION PLAN A JOINT PROJECT OF THE MENDOCINO COUNTY WATER AGENCY THE COASTAL CONSERVANCY THE ANDERSON VALLEY LAND TRUST Prepared by: Entrix, Inc. Pacific Watershed Associates Circuit Rider Productions, Inc. The Navarro Watershed Community Advisory Group Daniel T. Sicular, Ph.D. JUNE, 1998 NAVARRO WATERSHED RESTORATION PLAN Published Jointly by: ANDERSON VALLEY LAND TRUST, INCORPORATED P.O. Box 1000 Boonville, CA 95415 (707) 895-2090 CALIFORNIA STATE COASTAL CONSERVANCY 1330 Broadway Oakland, CA 94612-2530 (510) 286-1015 MENDOCINO COUNTY WATER AGENCY Courthouse Ukiah, CA 95482 (707) 463-4589 This Document is Printed on Recycled Paper TABLE OF CONTENTS Page List of Tables ......................................................................................................................... List of Figures........................................................................................................................ Glossary ................................................................................................................................. Acknowledgments.................................................................................................................. Executive Summary............................................................................................................... 1.0 Introduction................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Basis of Need for Restoration Plan...............................................................
  • (Oncorhynchus Mykiss) in Streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California

    (Oncorhynchus Mykiss) in Streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California

    Historical Distribution and Current Status of Steelhead/Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in Streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California Robert A. Leidy, Environmental Protection Agency, San Francisco, CA Gordon S. Becker, Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration, Oakland, CA Brett N. Harvey, John Muir Institute of the Environment, University of California, Davis, CA This report should be cited as: Leidy, R.A., G.S. Becker, B.N. Harvey. 2005. Historical distribution and current status of steelhead/rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration, Oakland, CA. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration TABLE OF CONTENTS Forward p. 3 Introduction p. 5 Methods p. 7 Determining Historical Distribution and Current Status; Information Presented in the Report; Table Headings and Terms Defined; Mapping Methods Contra Costa County p. 13 Marsh Creek Watershed; Mt. Diablo Creek Watershed; Walnut Creek Watershed; Rodeo Creek Watershed; Refugio Creek Watershed; Pinole Creek Watershed; Garrity Creek Watershed; San Pablo Creek Watershed; Wildcat Creek Watershed; Cerrito Creek Watershed Contra Costa County Maps: Historical Status, Current Status p. 39 Alameda County p. 45 Codornices Creek Watershed; Strawberry Creek Watershed; Temescal Creek Watershed; Glen Echo Creek Watershed; Sausal Creek Watershed; Peralta Creek Watershed; Lion Creek Watershed; Arroyo Viejo Watershed; San Leandro Creek Watershed; San Lorenzo Creek Watershed; Alameda Creek Watershed; Laguna Creek (Arroyo de la Laguna) Watershed Alameda County Maps: Historical Status, Current Status p. 91 Santa Clara County p. 97 Coyote Creek Watershed; Guadalupe River Watershed; San Tomas Aquino Creek/Saratoga Creek Watershed; Calabazas Creek Watershed; Stevens Creek Watershed; Permanente Creek Watershed; Adobe Creek Watershed; Matadero Creek/Barron Creek Watershed Santa Clara County Maps: Historical Status, Current Status p.
  • Pt. Isabel-Stege Area

    Pt. Isabel-Stege Area

    Tales of the Bay Shore -- Pt. Isabel-Stege area Geology: The “bones” of the shoreline from Albany to Richmond are a sliver of ancient, alien sea floor, caught on the edge of North America as it overrode the Pacific. Fleming Point (site of today’s racetrack), Albany Hill, Pt. Isabel, Brooks Island, scattered hillocks inland, the hills at Pt Richmond, and the hills across the San Pablo Strait (spanned by the Richmond Bridge) all are part of this Novato Terrane. Erosion and uplift eventually left their hard rock as hilltops in a valley. Still later – only about 5000 years ago -- rising seas from the melting glaciers of our last Ice Age flooded the valley, forming today’s San Francisco Bay. The “alien” hilltops became islands, peninsulas linked to shore by marsh, or isolated dome-like “turtlebacks.” Left: Portion of 1911 map of SF Bay showing many Native American sites near Pt. Isabel and Stege. Right: 1853 U.S. Coastal Survey map showing N. end of Albany Hill, Cerrito Creek, Pt. Isabel, and marshes/ to North. Native Americans: Native Americans would have watched the slow rise of today’s Bay. When Europeans reached North America, the East Bay was the home of Huchiun Ohlone peoples. Living in groups generally of fewer than 100 people, they moved seasonally amid rich and varied resources, gathering, hunting, fishing, and encouraging useful plants with pruning and burning. They made reed boats, baskets, nets, traps, mortars, and a wide variety of implements and decorations. Along the shellfish-rich shoreline they gradually built up substantial hills of debris – shell mounds -- that kept them above floods and served as multipurpose homesites, burial sites, refuse dumps, and more.
  • Community Participation and Creek Restoration in the East Bay of San Francisco

    Community Participation and Creek Restoration in the East Bay of San Francisco

    Louise A. Mozingo Community Participation and Creek Restoration and Recreation, had been inspired by an article of Bay Area Community Participation and historian Grey Brechin on the possibilities of daylighting creeks Creek Restoration in the East in Sonoma County north of San Francisco (Schemmerling, 2003). Doug Wolfe, a landscape architect for the City of Bay of San Francisco Berkeley, proposed that a short culverted stretch of Strawberry Creek crossing a new neighborhood park in Berkeley then culverted, be opened or “daylit.” As a first step in proposing Louise A. Mozingo the unprecedented idea, Wolfe named the new open space Strawberry Creek Park. As he later reported, this “lead to the ABSTRACT question ‘Where is this creek?’ My answer was that it was ‘Twenty feet down and waiting’” (Wolfe, 1994, 2). Controversial The creeks of the upper East Bay of San Francisco in the extreme, Wolfe found political support from Carol have been the location of two decades of precedent Schemmerling, and David Brower, founder of Friends of the setting creek restoration activities. This discussion will Earth, and a city council member. With vocal citizen support review the essential role of both citizen activism and at public meetings the radical concept prevailed. The notion NGOs in the advent of a restoration approach to creek that a reopened creek could be an asset rather than a hazard management. Beginning with small pilot projects to proved to be a lasting inspiration (Schemmerling; Wolfe, 2-3). “daylight” a culverted creek and spray paint signs on street drain inlets, participation in the restoration of the Also in Berkeley, a small but telling community education act East Bay creeks has evolved into a complex layering took place on city streets.
  • Point Isabel

    Point Isabel

    bulldozed as fl at as a pancake, which greatly El Cerrito Historical Society expanded the P O Box 304, El Cerrito, CA 94530 footprint of Pt. Isabel. (This and [email protected] several other projects around the Bay helped Vol. 24 create support for Summer 2008 Shooting trap (l) and an archery “Ham Shoot” (r) at the MacAteer-Pe- No. 3 The Forge the San Pablo Avenue Sportsman’s Club on Pt. Isabel tris Act of 1965, The Offi cial Publication of the El Cerrito Historical Society, Copyright © 2008 which established the BCDC, or Bay Conservation and Development Commission). Santa Fe, of course, built a rail spur to the development to provide a direct connection to their transcontinen- tal mainline. Once these preparations were complete, Santa Fe sat back and waited for the buyers OUR NEXT MEETING: 12 NOON SUNDAY, JULY 20TH to line up. However, the fi rst lot was not sold until 1963, when the old Co-op grocery store chain PICNIC AT HUBER PARK ON TERRACE DRIVE bought a lot for a large warehouse it needed. In the early 1970s the Postal Service chose the site for the huge bulk mail facility that still operates today. A condition of the building permit for the bulk mail facility was that the Federal Government President’s Message had to provide shoreline access for the public. Once the public saw the fantastic vistas available Our next meeting, at Noon on Sunday, July 20th in Huber Park, will be our annual pot- from the shoreline the popularity of the area grew rapidly.
  • Message from the Director

    Message from the Director

    • R EPORT• TO• THE• C OMMUNITY•••••F ISCAL• Y EARS• 2002• & • 2003• MESSAGE FROM THE DIRECTOR The Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District is proud to present this report detailing the District’s many activities for Fiscal Years 2002 and 2003. We want you, the community we serve, to know about all the work we do District to protect Alameda County from flooding and the efforts • taken to protect and enhance our natural resources. Preparing and distributing a report like this allows us to reach people in the most meaningful way—by sharing the stories and images of design, construction, and maintenance projects completed in each flood control zone. In addition, a summary of District responsibilities and finances is provided for public review. Conservation Donald J. LaBelle, Director • D ISTRICT GOALS ater When the Flood Control District was established in 1949, its first concern was to reduce regional W flooding. Early in the District’s history, engineers and planners realized that • flood control infrastructure could, in some instances, provide recreation opportunities. Today, Alameda Creek Trail, Lake Elizabeth, and other trails, and parks, and lakes are a testament to the District’s forethought. • The District has continued to maintain and repair infrastructure built as long as 50 years ago while responding to flood control needs created by new development throughout the area. Over the last 20 years, the District has turned even greater attention to environmental concerns. This includes repairing local creeks Control • damaged by stormwater flows, returning channelized waterways to more natural settings, adding parks and learning centers in watershed areas, working to prevent stormwater pollution, and educating the public about individual and collective roles we can all take to create a healthier environment.