DOCSLIB.ORG

Technology Readiness Levels for the New Millennium Program

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Technology Readiness Levels for the New Millennium Program Technology Readiness Levels for the New Millennium Program Charles P. Minning, Philip I. Moynihan, and John F. Stocky Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology 4800 Oak Grove Drive Pasadena, CA 9 1 109 818-354-4321 [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract- National Aeronautic and Space Administration’s A corollary to what qualifies as a specific technology (NASA) New Millennium Program (NMP) seeks to advance readiness is the pervasive confusion that exists between what space exploration by providing an in-space validating is actually new technology and what is development, which mechanism to verify the maturity of promising advanced this paper hopes to clarify. An assigned TRL pertains to the technologies that cannot be adequately validated with Earth- status of the technology itself, not to a particular stage in the based testing alone. In meeting this objective, NMP uses design and fabrication of a specific item. If new physics NASA Technology Readiness Levels (TRL) as key indica- elements are being applied or if combined effects from con- tors of technology advancement and assesses development ventional elements create a new function never before progress against this generalized metric. By providing an experienced, then an item is new technology and the TRL opportunity for in-space validation, NMP can mature a may be very low. However, if the components and subsys- tems being designed are based on known quantities, and the suitable advanced technology from TRL 4 (component end product will function within experienced operating and/or breadboard validation in laboratory environment) to a ranges that demonstrate effects similar to those of compo- TRL 7 (system prototype demonstrated in an Earth-based nents already flown, then this process is development and space environment). Spaceflight technology comprises a the TRL would be fairly high-regardless of the difficulty of myriad of categories, types, and functions, and as each producing the product. This is the interpretation gf the TRLs individual technology emerges, a consistent interpretation of that the present NMP flight-validation selections are its specific state of technological advancement relative to following. other technologies is problematic. The resulting ambiguity forms an inconsistent basis on which to judge a new technol- TABLEOF CONTENTS ogy’s TRL. To qualify for consideration by NMP, the technology must have at least achieved TRL 3 (analytical 1. INTRODUCTION........................................................ 1 2. FIRSTGENERATION VALIDATION FLIGHTS 2 and experimental critical function and/or characteristic ........... 3. SECONDGENERATION VALIDATION FLIGHTS 4 proof-of-concept achieved in a laboratory environment). The ....... 4. FUTURENMP FLIGHT OPPORTUNITIES 4 TRLs used by NMP are the same as those in general use at ................ 5. TECHNOLOGYREADINESS LEVELS NASA. The criteria used by NMP to determine when a FOR NMP VALIDATIONFLIGHTS 6 given TRL is reached are added to their description and are ......................... 6. SUMMARY ................................................................ 9 described here. The specific criteria for exit gates have ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................... 10 become better defined as NMP itself has evolved. A brief REFERENCES ............................................................. 10 summary of the NMP history shows how Nh4P missions BIOGRAPHIES............................................................ 10 have evolved, thus making the consistent interpretation of TRLs increasingly important. The notion of the “relevant 1. INTRODUCTION environment” is specifically emphasized, wherein relevant environment refers to the environment that adequately In 1995, the National Aeronautics and Space Administra- stresses the technology in order to provide sufficient confi- tion (NASA) created the New Millennium Program (NMP), dence in its testing. The TRL of a given technology is based and the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) was assigned to on the environment in which the technology has been tested manage the program for NASA. NMP’s objective is to and validated-beginning in the laboratory, advancing conduct space flight validation of breakthrough technologies through ever-improving simulation and testing, until finally for future space- and Earth-science missions. The achieving actual in-space validation. breakthrough technologies selected for validation must (1) 0-7803-7651-X/03/$17.00 0 2003 EEE 1 enable new science capabilities to fulfill NASA’s Space- and perspective of how the interpretation of the TRLs has Earth-Science Enterprise objectives and/or (2) reduce the evolved with the maturation of NMP itself. The first costs of future space- and Earth-science missions. The generation NMP missions included Deep Space 1 (DSl), space-flight validation objective of these technologies is to Deep Space 2 (DS2), and Earth Observing 1 (E01). These mitigate the risks to the first users and to promote the rapid missions were designed to provide a comprehensive, system- infusion of these technologies into future science. missions. level validation of suites of interacting, high-priority The goal of NMP is to mature a technology requiring flight spacecraft and measurement technologies. The second- validation from a Technology Readiness Level (TRL) 4 generation NMP missions began with Space Technology 5 (component and/or breadboard validation in laboratory (ST5) and Earth Observing 3 (E03). These missions also environment) to a TRL 7 (system prototype demonstrated in focused on system-level validations, but the elected suites of a space environment). Spaceflight technology comprises a technologies were selected through a revised process. While myriad of categories, types, and functions, and as each the NMP will continue in-space, system-level technology individual technology emerges, a consistent interpretation of validation missions, such missions are augmented with more its specific state of technological maturity relative to other highly focused, subsystem-level validation flights of technologies is problematic. This often results in an breakthrough technology subsystems. Brief descriptions of inconsistent basis on which to judge a new technology’s the first and second-generation NMP flights and a summary TRL. The purpose of this paper is to communicate the NMP of hture flight opportunities are given below. We then criteria for judging TRLs so that participants can develop describe the NMP interpretation of the TRLs, keeping in accurate and consistent plans and estimates. To qualify for mind the distinction between development maturity and consideration by NMP, the technology must have at least technological maturity. achieved TRL 3 (analytical and experimental critical function and/or characteristic proof-of-concept achieved in a laboratory environment). While the TRLs used by NMP are 2. FIRSTGENERATION VALIDATION FLIGHTS the same as those in general use at NASA, NMP has developedbcriteria used by the program to judge when each Deep Space I TRL has been reached. These supplemental criteria are described here. The specific criteria for exit gates have DSl, the first of the New Millennium missions, was become better defined as NMP itself has evolved. launched fiom the Kennedy Space Center on October 24, Additional information on the New Millennium Program is 1998. This spacecraft, depicted in Figure 1, carried a available via the Internet [ 11. complement of technologies that were validated during the 10 months following launch (see Table 1). This paper presents a brief historical overview of NMP’s technology validation missions to provide a clearer Table 1. Technologies Validated by DS 1 Technology Validated Key Technology Advance Autonomous Optical Validated autonomous command and control of spacecraft thrusting and attitude control Navigation system to demonstrate capability of maintaining desired course heading without human intervention. Low-Power Electronics Validated mission-life performance of fully depleted silicon-on-insulator (SOI) electronics. Ion Propulsion Subsystem Validated that ion-thruster ground testing provided a conservative testing environment as (including diagnostic sensor compared with space. suite) Solar Concentrator Arrays Proved that concentrator solar array technologies embodying substantial mass and cost with Reflective Line Element reductions could be deployed and operated in space while achieving performance levels that Technology (SCARLET) closely agree with model-based predictions. Beacon Monitor Operations Generated tones depicting spacecraft health to indicate urgency of need for DSN coverage. Experiment Remote Agent Experiment On-board artificial intelligence system for planning and executing spacecraft activities based on high-level goals. Multifunctional Structure Validated new paradigm for integrating electronics within structural panel, easing temperature control, and promising simplified future spacecraft. Small Deep Space Validated single-package combination of receiver, command detector, telemetry modulator, Transponder exciter, and beacon-tone generator allowing X-band uplink, and X-band and Ka-band downlink for factor of two mass savings. Ka-Band Solid-state Validated capability and established feasibility for very small, lightweight amplifier to Amdifier communicate in Ka band. ~ Miniature Camera and Compact science instrument with four imaging instruments sharing a common
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Deep Space Craft an Overview of Interplanetary Flight Dave Doody Deep Space Craft an Overview of Interplanetary Flight
    Deep Space Craft An Overview of Interplanetary Flight Dave Doody Deep Space Craft An Overview of Interplanetary Flight Published in association with PPraxisraxis PPublishiublishingng Chichester, UK Dave Doody NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory (Caltech) Pasadena California USA Front cover illustrations: (Upper) Artist's rendition of the Dawn spacecraft operating its ion propulsion system upon arrival at the main-belt asteroid Vesta in 2011. Image courtesy McRel, Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning. (Next lower) Artist's concept of the Phoenix lander operating in the Martian Arctic, as it did from May to November 2008. Image courtesy University of Arizona. (Lower left) Artist's concept of the Cassini spacecraft as it operates in Saturn orbit July 2004 through the present day. Back cover illustrations: (Left) A near-duplicate of the Mars Phoenix lander used in developing command sequences before being sent to the spacecraft. Here, members of the Robotic Arm Engineering Team test the arm's motorized raft in the Payload Interoperability Testbed at the University of Arizona, Tucson in July 2008. Image courtesy University of Arizona. (Right) Rob Manning, Chief Engineer of NASA's Mars Exploration Program, cheers along with other team members as the ®rst images from rover Spirit come back from Mars. Courtesy NASA/Bill Ingalls. SPRINGER±PRAXIS BOOKS IN ASTRONAUTICAL ENGINEERING SUBJECT ADVISORY EDITOR: John Mason M.B.E., B.Sc., M.Sc., Ph.D. ISBN 978-3-540-89509-1 Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York Springer is part of Springer-Science + Business Media (springer.com) Library of Congress Control Number: 2008943657 Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of research or private study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, this publication may only be reproduced, stored or transmitted, in any form or by any means, with the prior permission in writing of the publishers, or in the case of reprographic reproduction in accordance with the terms of licences issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency.
    [Show full text]
  • New Millennium Program
    NASA Facts National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA 91109 New Millennium Program NASA's New Millennium program, a series of discerning trends, examining planetary climates and missions to test cutting-edge technologies never atmospheres, or landing to study such surface phe- before flown, will pave the way for a 21st century nomena as seismic and meteorological activity. Other fleet of affordable, frequently launched spacecraft sets of spacecraft could form a constellation uniquely perhaps 10 to suited to study 15 per year solar systems with highly beyond our own. focused sci- These goals ence objec- require significant tives. changes in almost New all aspects of Millennium spacecraft design will develop and deployment. and validate New Millennium the essential experimental tech- technologies nology flights will and capabilities validate key tech- required for nologies required these new to move toward. types of mis- Testing these sions. The pro- technologies in gram is flight will speed designed to ini- up their infusion tiate a revolu- New Millenniums Deep Space 1 will test ion propulsion and other technologies into the market- tionary new when the spacecraft flies by an asteroid and later possibly a comet (above). place. Some of way of explor- the space instru- ing Earth, the solar system and astrophysical events in ments of tomorrow may become as small and light- and far beyond the Milky Way galaxy. These new weight as a pocket wallet. missions will ensure NASA's technological readiness Drawing on diverse sectors of the country's sci- for post-2000 space and Earth science missions.
    [Show full text]
  • Mp-Avt-171-09
    UNCLASSIFIED/UNLIMITED Attitude Determination and Control of Future Small Satellites H. Ersin Soken, A. Rustem Aslan and Chingiz Hajiyev Aeronautics and Astronautics Faculty Istanbul Technical University Istanbul, TURKEY [email protected]/[email protected]/[email protected] ABSTRACT As well as other subsystems, Attitude Determination and Control System (ADCS) development is a challenging process for small satellites because of design limitations, such as size, weight and the power consumption. Besides, if they are thought in a concept with military missions, then the requirement for a high attitude pointing accuracy is something certain. Works on the effective attitude determination and control methods for small satellites can be accepted as a part of this struggle. In this paper, problems that are met during ADCS development phase for future small satellites are stated and possible solutions are suggested. 1.0 INTRODUCTION Since their first appearance, small satellites have begun to play a more and more important role in space researches and today, they have a certain share in astronautic applications, especially about new technology demonstration. Because of many advantages such as low investment and operational costs, enabling COTS (commercial of the shell) technology in space, short system development periods etc. they have been highly preferred to their larger competitors. More than 400 micro satellites launched in the last 20 years is a good proof for that [1]. Mini Satellite 100-500 kg Micro Satellite 10-100 kg Nano Satellite 1-10 kg Pico Satellite 0.1-1 kg Table 1: Small satellite classification. Although they have been investigated in depth, there are still many steps to be taken in the development phase of these types of satellites and an important field to be examined is their attitude determination and control systems (ADCS).
    [Show full text]
  • GST Responses to “Questions to Inform Development of the National Plan”
    GST Responses to “Questions to Inform Development of the National Plan” Name (optional): Dr. Darrel Williams Position (optional): Chief Scientist, (240) 542-1106; [email protected] Institution (optional): Global Science & Technology, Inc. Greenbelt, Maryland 20770 Global Science & Technology, Inc. (GST) is pleased to provide the following answers as a contribution towards OSTP’s effort to develop a national plan for civil Earth observations. In our response we provide information to support three main themes: 1. There is strong science need for high temporal resolution of moderate spatial resolution satellite earth observation that can be achieved with cost effective, innovative new approaches. 2. Operational programs need to be designed to obtain sustained climate data records. Continuity of Earth observations can be achieved through more efficient and economical means. 3. We need programs to address the integration of remotely sensed data with in situ data. GST has carefully considered these important national Earth observation issues over the past few years and has submitted the following RFI responses: The USGS RFI on Landsat Data Continuity Concepts (April 2012), NASA’s Sustainable Land Imaging Architecture RFI (September 2013), and This USGEO RFI (November 2013) relative to OSTP’s efforts to develop a national plan for civil Earth observations. In addition to the above RFI responses, GST led the development of a mature, fully compliant flight mission concept in response to NASA’s Earth Venture-2 RFP in September 2011. Our capacity to address these critical national issues resides in GST’s considerable bench strength in Earth science understanding (Drs. Darrel Williams, DeWayne Cecil, Samuel Goward, and Dixon Butler) and in NASA systems engineering and senior management oversight (Drs.
    [Show full text]
  • JPL Has Once Again Closed out the Year in Style. Less Than a Month
    Jet DECEMBER Propulsion 2006 Laboratory VOLUME 36 NUMBER 17 2006 INREVIEW By Mark Whalen JPL has once again closed out the year in style. Less than a month after the announcement that Mars Global Surveyor has likely finished its operat- ing career, the most productive Mars mission in history came through with the explosive news in December that its photographs have revealed bright new deposits in two gullies on Mars that suggest water carried sediment A gully as imaged by Mars Global Surveyor liquid water was involved in its genesis. through them sometime during the is shown at left in August 1999 and at right However, this observation and a similar in September 2005. The images show the light-toned flow in Terra Sirenum to- past seven years. southeast wall of an unnamed crater in the gether show that some gully sites are Centauri Montes region. No light-toned indeed changing today, providing tanta- In the meantime, the Laboratory con- deposit was present in August 1999, but lizing evidence there might be sources of appeared by February 2004. The new light- liquid water beneath the surface of Mars tinues its studies of the solar system toned flow, by itself, does not prove that right now. and beyond, with 15 spacecraft, two rovers, seven science instruments and three Earth observatories all meeting or exceeding their require- ments. Following are some highlights, chronologically, from 2006. Continued on page 2 2 niverse CONT'D U 2006INREVIEW A new image from the Galaxy Evolution Explorer completed MARCH a multi-wavelength, neon-col- Cassini found what may be evidence ored portrait of the enormous of liquid water reservoirs that erupt in Cartwheel galaxy after a smaller Yellowstone-like geysers on Saturn’s galaxy plunged through it, trigger- moon Enceladus.
    [Show full text]
  • CONSTELLATION an Official Publication of the Bucks-Mont Astronomical Association, Inc
    CONSTELLATION An Official Publication of the Bucks-Mont Astronomical Association, Inc. April/May/June Chris Sommers and VOLUME 23, Issue No. 2 2008 Scott Petersen, Editors © BMAA, Inc. 2008 BMAA News BMAA has had a busy spring, despite almost all of our StarWatches being clouded out. In April we attended an open house at Montgomery County Community College’s Observatory, and Dwight Dulsky and Lou Vittorio made presentations at Upper Moreland Middle School. In May we had our Astronomy Day exhibit set up in Peddler’s Village in New Hope and Dwight Dulsky led the effort at the Bucks County Science Teachers Association’s semi- annual meeting in Doylestown. We have a lot to look forward to this summer, including the summer triangle, summer globular clusters (see Orum Stringer’s List in this Issue) including M56 as described by Alan Pasicznyk, jovial Jupiter and its parade of double shadow transits, and multiple occultations of Antares by the Moon. Happy observing BMAAers!!! Summer Planetary Jewel: Jovial Jupiter Courtesy of Steve Olson BMAA Gophers Position Name President Dwight Dulsky Vice President Bernie Kosher Treasurer Ed Radomski Secretary Herb Borteck Star Watch Coordinator George Reagan Constellation Editors Chris Sommers and Scott Petersen Webmaster Jim Moyer For More Information About BMAA Go to www.bma2.org. 1 ****** Alan's Collection of Excellent Deep Sky Objects Through a 4.5 Inch Newtonian. Raisins in a Pie", M56 ¾ Alan Pasicznyk When I finally located the dim glow of M56 for the first time on July 15, 1991, I was expecting to find nothing more than "just another globular cluster" to log into my list of Messier objects.
    [Show full text]
  • FY 2002 Performance and Accountability Report FY 2002 Was the Second Year of Continuous, Permanent Human Habitation of the International Space Station
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Fiscal Year 2002 Performance and Accountability Report Contents NASAVision and Mission Part I: Management’s Discussion and Analysis Transmittal Letter 6Message From the Administrator 8Reliability and Completeness of Financial and Performance Data 9Federal Managers’ Financial Integrity Act Statement of Assurance Overview 13Mission 13Organizational Structure 15Highlights of Performance Goals and Results 53Actions Planned to Achieve Key Unmet Goals 53Looking Forward 55Analysis of Financial Statements 55Systems, Controls, and Legal Compliance 56Integrity Act Material Weaknesses and Non-Conformances 58Additional Key Management Information 58The President’s Management Agenda 71Management Challenges and High-Risk Areas Part II: Performance 84Summary of Annual Performance by Strategic Goals Performance Discussion 87Space Science 99Earth Science 109Biological and Physical Research 117Human Exploration and Development of Space 123Aerospace Technology Supporting Data 133Space Science 145Earth Science 173Biological and Physical Research 185Human Exploration and Development of Space 193Aerospace Technology 209Manage Strategically Crosscutting Process 219Provide Aerospace Products and Capabilities Crosscutting Process 223Generate Knowledge Crosscutting Process 225Communicate Knowledge Crosscutting Process Part III: Financial 233Letter From the Chief Financial Officer Financial Statements and Related Auditor’s Reports 236Financial Overview 238Financial Statements 267Auditor’s Reports NASA Office of Inspector
    [Show full text]
  • Mars Earth Return Vehicle (MERV) Propulsion Options
    Mars Earth Return Vehicle (MERV) Propulsion Options Steven R. Oleson,1 Melissa L. McGuire,2 Laura Burke,3 James Fincannon,4 Joe Warner,5 Glenn Williams,6 and Thomas Parkey7 NASA Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio 44135 Tony Colozza,8 Jim Fittje,9 Mike Martini,10 and Tom Packard11 Analex Corporation, Cleveland, Ohio 44135 Joseph Hemminger12 N&R Engineering, Cleveland, Ohio 44135 John Gyekenyesi13 ASRC Engineering, Cleveland, Ohio 44135 The COMPASS Team was tasked with the design of a Mars Sample Return Vehicle. The current Mars sample return mission is a joint National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and European Space Agency (ESA) mission, with ESA contributing the launch vehicle for the Mars Sample Return Vehicle. The COMPASS Team ran a series of design trades for this Mars sample return vehicle. Four design options were investigated: Chemical Return /solar electric propulsion (SEP) stage outbound, all-SEP, all chemical and chemical with aerobraking. The all-SEP and Chemical with aerobraking were deemed the best choices for comparison. SEP can eliminate both the Earth flyby and the aerobraking maneuver (both considered high risk by the Mars Sample Return Project) required by the chemical propulsion option but also require long low thrust spiral times. However this is offset somewhat by the chemical/aerobrake missions use of an Earth flyby and aerobraking which also take many months. Cost and risk analyses are used to further differentiate the all-SEP and Chemical/Aerobrake options. 1COMPASS Lead, DSB0, 21000 Brookpark Road, and AIAA Senior Member. 2COMPASS Integration Lead, DSB0, 21000 Brookpark Road, non-member. 3Mission Designer, DSB0, 21000 Brookpark Road, and Non-Member.
    [Show full text]
  • Artificial Intelligence at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory
    AI Magazine Volume 18 Number 1 (1997) (© AAAI) Articles Making an Impact Artificial Intelligence at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory Steve Chien, Dennis DeCoste, Richard Doyle, and Paul Stolorz ■ The National Aeronautics and Space Administra- described here is in the context of the remote- tion (NASA) is being challenged to perform more agent autonomy technology experiment that frequent and intensive space-exploration mis- will fly on the New Millennium Deep Space sions at greatly reduced cost. Nowhere is this One Mission in 1998 (a collaborative effort challenge more acute than among robotic plane- involving JPL and NASA Ames). Many of the tary exploration missions that the Jet Propulsion AI technologists who work at NASA expected Laboratory (JPL) conducts for NASA. This article describes recent and ongoing work on spacecraft to have the opportunity to build an intelli- autonomy and ground systems that builds on a gent spacecraft at some point in their careers; legacy of existing success at JPL applying AI tech- we are surprised and delighted that it has niques to challenging computational problems in come this early. planning and scheduling, real-time monitoring By the year 2000, we expect to demonstrate and control, scientific data analysis, and design NASA spacecraft possessing on-board automat- automation. ed goal-level closed-loop control in the plan- ning and scheduling of activities to achieve mission goals, maneuvering and pointing to execute these activities, and detecting and I research and technology development resolving of faults to continue the mission reached critical mass at the Jet Propul- without requiring ground support. At this Asion Laboratory (JPL) about five years point, mission accomplishment can begin to ago.
    [Show full text]
  • ISSUE 134, AUGUST 2013 2 Imperative: Venus Continued
    Imperative: Venus — Virgil L. Sharpton, Lunar and Planetary Institute Venus and Earth began as twins. Their sizes and densities are nearly identical and they stand out as being considerably more massive than other terrestrial planetary bodies. Formed so close to Earth in the solar nebula, Venus likely has Earth-like proportions of volatiles, refractory elements, and heat-generating radionuclides. Yet the Venus that has been revealed through exploration missions to date is hellishly hot, devoid of oceans, lacking plate tectonics, and bathed in a thick, reactive atmosphere. A less Earth-like environment is hard to imagine. Venus, Earth, and Mars to scale. Which L of our planetary neighbors is most similar to Earth? Hint: It isn’t Mars. PWhy and when did Earth’s and Venus’ evolutionary paths diverge? This fundamental and unresolved question drives the need for vigorous new exploration of Venus. The answer is central to understanding Venus in the context of terrestrial planets and their evolutionary processes. In addition, however, and unlike virtually any other planetary body, Venus could hold important clues to understanding our own planet — how it has maintained a habitable environment for so long and how long it can continue to do so. Precisely because it began so like Earth, yet evolved to be so different, Venus is the planet most likely to cast new light on the conditions that determine whether or not a planet evolves habitable environments. NASA’s Kepler mission and other concurrent efforts to explore beyond our star system are likely to find Earth-sized planets around Sun-sized stars within a few years.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Body Technology Roadmap
    DRAFT Small Body Technology Roadmap Executive Summary: The planetary science of small bodies includes ground observations and missions to fly-by, rendezvous, and return samples from a diverse set of targets. Small bodies include asteroids, comets, small satellites, dwarf planets, centaurs, trans-Neptunian objects, and interplanetary dust. These targets offer great diversity over a wide range of heliocentric locations, however; many have similar characteristics that allow for a practical assessment of near-term technology needs. The highest priority needs include a variable focus imager, a high resolution topography instrument, affordable electric propulsion, and a large number of sample return supporting technologies. An initial roadmap of development for small body missions in provided below. I. Introduction his document is to serve as the initial start of an evolving technology development roadmap for small body T mission instruments and systems to allow maximum science return. The missions of interest are for observations, fly-by, rendezvous, landing, and sample return from asteroids, comets, small satellites, dwarf planets, centaurs, and trans-Neptunian objects. Small body missions are diverse both in the type and class of viable missions, but also in the broad range of celestial location. Though the diversity is great, most small body mission instruments and system requirements are broadly applicable over the range of missions without overly cumbersome unique instrument requirements one would expect trying to encompass in-situ environments and science priorities at the larger bodies of planets and moons. The original approach for developing this technology roadmap for small body missions was to develop an all inclusive science traceability matrix for all classes of small body missions, specify the instrument/systems requirements to enable the science return, identify state-of-the-art (SOA) capabilities, and advocate technology development to fill the requirements gap.
    [Show full text]
  • Status of Solar Sail Propulsion: Moving Toward an Interstellar Probe
    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20070037462 2019-08-30T01:59:41+00:00Z Status of Solar Sail Propulsion: Moving Toward an Interstellar Probe Les Johnson, Roy M. Young, and Edward E. Montgomery IV NASA George C. Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville. AL 35812 Abstract. NASA's In-Space Propulsion Technology Program has developed the first- generation of solar sail propulsion systems sufficient to accomplish inner solar system science and exploration missions. These first-generation solar sails, when operational, will range in size from 40 meters to well over 100 meters in diameter and have an areal density of less than 13 grams-per-square meter. A rigorous, multiyear technology development effort culminated last year in the testing of two different 20-meter solar sail systems under thermal vacuum conditions. This effort provided a number of significant insights into the optimal design and expected performance of solar sails as well as an understanding of the methods and costs of building and using them. In a separate effort, solar sail orbital analysis tools for mission design were developed and tested. Laboratory simulations of the effects of long-term space radiation exposure were also conducted on two candidate solar sail materials. Detailed radia- tion and charging environments were defined for mission trajectories outside the protection of the earth's magnetosphere, in the solar wind environment. These were used in other analytical tools to prove the adequacy of sail design features for accommodating the harsh space environment. Preceding, and in conjunction with these technology efforts, NASA sponsored several mission application studies for solar sails, including one that would use an evolved sail capa- bility to support humanity's first mission into nearby interstellar space.
    [Show full text]