Tetherin-Driven Adaptation of Vpu and Nef Function and the Evolution of Pandemic and Nonpandemic HIV-1 Strains
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Nef-Infectivity Enigma: Mechanisms of Enhanced Lentiviral Infection Jolien Vermeire§, Griet Vanbillemont§, Wojciech Witkowski and Bruno Verhasselt*
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by PubMed Central 474 Current HIV Research, 2011, 9, 474-489 The Nef-Infectivity Enigma: Mechanisms of Enhanced Lentiviral Infection Jolien Vermeire§, Griet Vanbillemont§, Wojciech Witkowski and Bruno Verhasselt* Department of Clinical Chemistry, Microbiology, and Immunology, Ghent University, Belgium Abstract: The Nef protein is an essential factor for lentiviral pathogenesis in humans and other simians. Despite a multitude of functions attributed to this protein, the exact role of Nef in disease progression remains unclear. One of its most intriguing functions is the ability of Nef to enhance the infectivity of viral particles. In this review we will discuss current insights in the mechanism of this well-known, yet poorly understood Nef effect. We will elaborate on effects of Nef, on both virion biogenesis and the early stage of the cellular infection, that might be involved in infectivity enhancement. In addition, we provide an overview of different HIV-1 Nef domains important for optimal infectivity and briefly discuss some possible sources of the frequent discrepancies in the field. Hereby we aim to contribute to a better understanding of this highly conserved and therapeutically attractive Nef function. Keywords: Nef, HIV, infectivity, viral replication, mutation analysis, envelope protein, cholesterol, proteasome. 1. INTRODUCTION 2. THE MULTIFACETED NEF PROTEIN Despite the globally declining number of new human As early as 1991, infections of rhesus monkeys with nef- immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections [1] and the hopeful deleted simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) revealed a observation that cure from HIV infection does not seem dramatic reduction of viral loads and disease progression in impossible [2], the HIV pandemic still remains a very absence of nef [6]. -
HIV-1 Rev Downregulates Tat Expression and Viral Replication Via Modulation of NAD(P)H:Quinine Oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1)
ARTICLE Received 25 Jul 2014 | Accepted 22 Apr 2015 | Published 10 Jun 2015 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms8244 HIV-1 Rev downregulates Tat expression and viral replication via modulation of NAD(P)H:quinine oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1) Sneh Lata1,*, Amjad Ali2,*, Vikas Sood1,2,w, Rameez Raja2 & Akhil C. Banerjea2 HIV-1 gene expression and replication largely depend on the regulatory proteins Tat and Rev, but it is unclear how the intracellular levels of these viral proteins are regulated after infection. Here we report that HIV-1 Rev causes specific degradation of cytoplasmic Tat, which results in inhibition of HIV-1 replication. The nuclear export signal (NES) region of Rev is crucial for this activity but is not involved in direct interactions with Tat. Rev reduces the levels of ubiquitinated forms of Tat, which have previously been reported to be important for its transcriptional properties. Tat is stabilized in the presence of NAD(P)H:quinine oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1), and potent degradation of Tat is induced by dicoumarol, an NQO1 inhibitor. Furthermore, Rev causes specific reduction in the levels of endogenous NQO1. Thus, we propose that Rev is able to induce degradation of Tat indirectly by downregulating NQO1 levels. Our findings have implications in HIV-1 gene expression and latency. 1 Department of Microbiology, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Delhi 110095, India. 2 Laboratory of Virology, National Institute of Immunology, New Delhi 110067, India. * These authors contributed equally to this work. w Present address: Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, Haryana 121004, India. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to A.C.B. -
Opportunistic Intruders: How Viruses Orchestrate ER Functions to Infect Cells
REVIEWS Opportunistic intruders: how viruses orchestrate ER functions to infect cells Madhu Sudhan Ravindran*, Parikshit Bagchi*, Corey Nathaniel Cunningham and Billy Tsai Abstract | Viruses subvert the functions of their host cells to replicate and form new viral progeny. The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) has been identified as a central organelle that governs the intracellular interplay between viruses and hosts. In this Review, we analyse how viruses from vastly different families converge on this unique intracellular organelle during infection, co‑opting some of the endogenous functions of the ER to promote distinct steps of the viral life cycle from entry and replication to assembly and egress. The ER can act as the common denominator during infection for diverse virus families, thereby providing a shared principle that underlies the apparent complexity of relationships between viruses and host cells. As a plethora of information illuminating the molecular and cellular basis of virus–ER interactions has become available, these insights may lead to the development of crucial therapeutic agents. Morphogenesis Viruses have evolved sophisticated strategies to establish The ER is a membranous system consisting of the The process by which a virus infection. Some viruses bind to cellular receptors and outer nuclear envelope that is contiguous with an intri‑ particle changes its shape and initiate entry, whereas others hijack cellular factors that cate network of tubules and sheets1, which are shaped by structure. disassemble the virus particle to facilitate entry. After resident factors in the ER2–4. The morphology of the ER SEC61 translocation delivering the viral genetic material into the host cell and is highly dynamic and experiences constant structural channel the translation of the viral genes, the resulting proteins rearrangements, enabling the ER to carry out a myriad An endoplasmic reticulum either become part of a new virus particle (or particles) of functions5. -
Animal Models for HIV/AIDS Research
REVIEWS Animal models for HIV/AIDS research Theodora Hatziioannou1 and David T. Evans2 Abstract | The AIDS pandemic continues to present us with unique scientific and public health challenges. Although the development of effective antiretroviral therapy has been a major triumph, the emergence of drug resistance requires active management of treatment regimens and the continued development of new antiretroviral drugs. Moreover, despite nearly 30 years of intensive investigation, we still lack the basic scientific knowledge necessary to produce a safe and effective vaccine against HIV-1. Animal models offer obvious advantages in the study of HIV/AIDS, allowing for a more invasive investigation of the disease and for preclinical testing of drugs and vaccines. Advances in humanized mouse models, non-human primate immunogenetics and recombinant challenge viruses have greatly increased the number and sophistication of available mouse and simian models. Understanding the advantages and limitations of each of these models is essential for the design of animal studies to guide the development of vaccines and antiretroviral therapies for the prevention and treatment of HIV-1 infection. 4,5 ESCRT The viruses that cause AIDS — HIV‑1 and HIV‑2 — captivity rarely results in the development of disease . (Endosomal sorting complex belong to a group of retroviruses that are endemic to Furthermore, owing to their endangered status and required for transport). A African apes and Old World monkeys and are known high maintenance costs, chimpanzees are not a practical conserved cellular machinery collectively as the primate lentiviruses. HIV‑1, which is model for AIDS. for the sorting of ubiquitylated cargo proteins into vesicles responsible for the global AIDS pandemic, and HIV‑2, When considering species other than humans as and the subsequent scission which causes AIDS in regions of West Africa, are prin‑ models for HIV‑1 infection, it is evident that the cellular of the membrane neck. -
A Novel Ebola Virus VP40 Matrix Protein-Based Screening for Identification of Novel Candidate Medical Countermeasures
viruses Communication A Novel Ebola Virus VP40 Matrix Protein-Based Screening for Identification of Novel Candidate Medical Countermeasures Ryan P. Bennett 1,† , Courtney L. Finch 2,† , Elena N. Postnikova 2 , Ryan A. Stewart 1, Yingyun Cai 2 , Shuiqing Yu 2 , Janie Liang 2, Julie Dyall 2 , Jason D. Salter 1 , Harold C. Smith 1,* and Jens H. Kuhn 2,* 1 OyaGen, Inc., 77 Ridgeland Road, Rochester, NY 14623, USA; [email protected] (R.P.B.); [email protected] (R.A.S.); [email protected] (J.D.S.) 2 NIH/NIAID/DCR/Integrated Research Facility at Fort Detrick (IRF-Frederick), Frederick, MD 21702, USA; courtney.fi[email protected] (C.L.F.); [email protected] (E.N.P.); [email protected] (Y.C.); [email protected] (S.Y.); [email protected] (J.L.); [email protected] (J.D.) * Correspondence: [email protected] (H.C.S.); [email protected] (J.H.K.); Tel.: +1-585-697-4351 (H.C.S.); +1-301-631-7245 (J.H.K.) † These authors contributed equally to this work. Abstract: Filoviruses, such as Ebola virus and Marburg virus, are of significant human health concern. From 2013 to 2016, Ebola virus caused 11,323 fatalities in Western Africa. Since 2018, two Ebola virus disease outbreaks in the Democratic Republic of the Congo resulted in 2354 fatalities. Although there is progress in medical countermeasure (MCM) development (in particular, vaccines and antibody- based therapeutics), the need for efficacious small-molecule therapeutics remains unmet. Here we describe a novel high-throughput screening assay to identify inhibitors of Ebola virus VP40 matrix protein association with viral particle assembly sites on the interior of the host cell plasma membrane. -
IAS 2009: Conference Report
July-August 2009 WWW.IAVIREPORT.ORG | VOLUME 13, NUMBER 4 IAS 2009: Conference Report Challenge Models Characterizing and optimizing viral challenge models for vaccine research EDITOR’S LETTER What if there were magic pills that could effectively treat HIV infection, prevent HIV-infected indi- viduals from transmitting the virus to others, reduce prevalence of tuberculosis, and perhaps even protect uninfected individuals from acquiring HIV? Oh wait, maybe there are. They’re called antiretrovirals (ARVs), and they have revolutionized the treatment of HIV infection. So far, the road to developing biomedical interventions to prevent HIV infection has been a bit rockier. In his talk at the 5th International AIDS Society Conference on HIV Pathogenesis, Treatment and Pre- vention, held recently in Cape Town, South Africa (see Everything from Cause to Cure for our report on the conference), Ronald Gray of Johns Hopkins University noted that of 29 trials evaluating the efficacy of different biomedical HIV prevention strategies, only four have shown significant success, and five have wshown possible harm. Until an effective vaccine or other HIV prevention strategy is developed, ARVs are being billed as one of the greatest hopes for controlling the global spread of HIV. One ARV-based approach to prevention is getting more HIV infected individuals on therapy. Evidence is accumulating that starting ARV treatment earlier in the course of HIV infection is beneficial. For prevention, the idea is that therapy, which efficiently and rapidly reduces viral load, could prevent those people already infected from transmitting HIV to others. This serves as the basis for the so-called test and treat strategy, which is explored in this issue (see Test and Treat on Trial) . -
Lentivirus and Lentiviral Vectors Fact Sheet
Lentivirus and Lentiviral Vectors Family: Retroviridae Genus: Lentivirus Enveloped Size: ~ 80 - 120 nm in diameter Genome: Two copies of positive-sense ssRNA inside a conical capsid Risk Group: 2 Lentivirus Characteristics Lentivirus (lente-, latin for “slow”) is a group of retroviruses characterized for a long incubation period. They are classified into five serogroups according to the vertebrate hosts they infect: bovine, equine, feline, ovine/caprine and primate. Some examples of lentiviruses are Human (HIV), Simian (SIV) and Feline (FIV) Immunodeficiency Viruses. Lentiviruses can deliver large amounts of genetic information into the DNA of host cells and can integrate in both dividing and non- dividing cells. The viral genome is passed onto daughter cells during division, making it one of the most efficient gene delivery vectors. Most lentiviral vectors are based on the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), which will be used as a model of lentiviral vector in this fact sheet. Structure of the HIV Virus The structure of HIV is different from that of other retroviruses. HIV is roughly spherical with a diameter of ~120 nm. HIV is composed of two copies of positive ssRNA that code for nine genes enclosed by a conical capsid containing 2,000 copies of the p24 protein. The ssRNA is tightly bound to nucleocapsid proteins, p7, and enzymes needed for the development of the virion: reverse transcriptase (RT), proteases (PR), ribonuclease and integrase (IN). A matrix composed of p17 surrounds the capsid ensuring the integrity of the virion. This, in turn, is surrounded by an envelope composed of two layers of phospholipids taken from the membrane of a human cell when a newly formed virus particle buds from the cell. -
HIV-1) CD4 Receptor and Its Central Role in Promotion of HIV-1 Infection
MICROBIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, Mar. 1995, p. 63–93 Vol. 59, No. 1 0146-0749/95/$04.0010 Copyright q 1995, American Society for Microbiology The Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) CD4 Receptor and Its Central Role in Promotion of HIV-1 Infection STEPHANE BOUR,* ROMAS GELEZIUNAS,† AND MARK A. WAINBERG* McGill AIDS Centre, Lady Davis Institute-Jewish General Hospital, and Departments of Microbiology and Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3T 1E2 INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................................................63 RETROVIRAL RECEPTORS .....................................................................................................................................64 Receptors for Animal Retroviruses ........................................................................................................................64 CD4 Is the Major Receptor for HIV-1 Infection..................................................................................................65 ROLE OF THE CD4 CORECEPTOR IN T-CELL ACTIVATION........................................................................65 Structural Features of the CD4 Coreceptor..........................................................................................................65 Interactions of CD4 with Class II MHC Determinants ......................................................................................66 CD4–T-Cell Receptor Interactions during T-Cell Activation -
Boston March 4-7, 2018 Program and Conference Information
Program and Conference Information Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections Boston March 4-7, 2018 General Information CONTENTS Information General CROI FOUNDATION ...........................................................2 IAS–USA.......................................................................2 CROI 2018 PROGRAM COMMITTEE.........................................3 Scientific Program Committee .........................................3 Community Liaison Subcommittee .....................................5 EXTERNAL REVIEWERS . 6 SCHOLARSHIP AWARDEES ..................................................8 New Investigator Awardees.................................................8 International Investigator Awardees .......................................12 Community Educator Awardees............................................12 CONTINUING MEDICAL EDUCATION ......................................13 GENERAL INFORMATION . .15 Overview .................................................................15 Conference Support .......................................................15 Americans With Disabilities Act ............................................15 Emergency Services . .15 Embargo Policies and Social Media ....................................16 Welcome Reception .......................................................16 Meals.....................................................................16 Overflow Accommodations for Oral Sessions................................17 Mobile App ...............................................................17 -
Structural Basis of CD4 Downregulation by HIV-1 Nef
ARTICLES https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-020-0463-z Structural basis of CD4 downregulation by HIV-1 Nef Yonghwa Kwon1, Robyn M. Kaake2,3, Ignacia Echeverria4, Marissa Suarez5, Mohammad Karimian Shamsabadi 1, Charlotte Stoneham5,6, Peter W. Ramirez6, Jacob Kress1, Rajendra Singh5,6, Andrej Sali4,7, Nevan Krogan 2,3, John Guatelli5,6 and Xiaofei Jia 1 ✉ The HIV-1 Nef protein suppresses multiple immune surveillance mechanisms to promote viral pathogenesis and is an attractive target for the development of novel therapeutics. A key function of Nef is to remove the CD4 receptor from the cell surface by hijacking clathrin- and adaptor protein complex 2 (AP2)-dependent endocytosis. However, exactly how Nef does this has been elusive. Here, we describe the underlying mechanism as revealed by a 3.0-Å crystal structure of a fusion protein comprising Nef and the cytoplasmic domain of CD4 bound to the tetrameric AP2 complex. An intricate combination of conformational changes occurs in both Nef and AP2 to enable CD4 binding and downregulation. A pocket on Nef previously identified as crucial for recruiting class I MHC is also responsible for recruiting CD4, revealing a potential approach to inhibit two of Nef’s activities and sensitize the virus to immune clearance. he HIV-1 protein Nef is a critical factor in viral pathogenesis1. domains of membrane cargos. Two sorting motifs are commonly Expression of Nef in vivo is required for high viral loads and recognized by APs. The tyrosine-based motifs (YxxΦ, where Φ is for progression to AIDS2. Individuals infected with HIV-1 a bulky hydrophobic residue) bind to the μ subunits of APs, while T 3,4 encoding defective nef genes do not develop AIDS for decades . -
It's Not (Just) What You're Thinking
ISSUE 07 SPRING 2021 It’s not (just) what you’re thinking ALSO How the brain’s internal states drive behavior Testing for COVID, the easy way Stalking the cells that spread cancer The debate over debate “We still don’t know how the brain really works. How does information from thousands of firing neurons get organized, and how does this organization fluctuate over time?” 20 It’s all about your frame of mind We think of brains as computers—stimulus in, action out. But they’re far more finicky than any iMac. Easily swayed by underlying internal states such as hunger, aggression, or arousal, our neurons are capable of incredible flexibility. For neuroscientists, it’s yet another wrinkle in understanding our wrinkliest organ. Illustration by Ellen Weinstein This magazine is now available as a newsletter. BECOME A SUBSCRIBER. The best of each issue, delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up at go.rockefeller.edu/get-seek ALEKSANDAR SAVIĆ CONTENTS ISSUE 07 SPRING 2021 42 The pandemic has changed us The vaccine works. Scientists did their part. But what happens next? Rockefeller researchers who spent the past year on the front lines discuss the challenges ahead—for society and for science. “Much of what we know comes from studies of HIV, but we now have the opportunity to go deeper, generating technologies to advance research on virtually any infectious disease.” 2 SPRING 2021 Seek Illustration by Daniel Lievano FEATURES FOREFRONT “The scientific 34 method is objective, 6 Testing, testing but the enterprise Scientists are learning more and more about this coronavirus. -
Genetic Variation and Function of the HIV-1 Tat Protein
Medical Microbiology and Immunology (2019) 208:131–169 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00430-019-00583-z REVIEW Genetic variation and function of the HIV-1 Tat protein Cassandra Spector1,2 · Anthony R. Mele1,2 · Brian Wigdahl1,2,3 · Michael R. Nonnemacher1,2,3 Received: 23 August 2018 / Accepted: 11 February 2019 / Published online: 5 March 2019 © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019 Abstract Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) encodes a transactivator of transcription (Tat) protein, which has several functions that promote viral replication, pathogenesis, and disease. Amino acid variation within Tat has been observed to alter the functional properties of Tat and, depending on the HIV-1 subtype, may produce Tat phenotypes differing from viruses’ representative of each subtype and commonly used in in vivo and in vitro experimentation. The molecular properties of Tat allow for distinctive functional activities to be determined such as the subcellular localization and other intracellular and extracellular functional aspects of this important viral protein influenced by variation within the Tat sequence. Once Tat has been transported into the nucleus and becomes engaged in transactivation of the long terminal repeat (LTR), vari- ous Tat variants may differ in their capacity to activate viral transcription. Post-translational modification patterns based on these amino acid variations may alter interactions between Tat and host factors, which may positively or negatively affect this process. In addition, the ability of HIV-1 to utilize or not utilize the transactivation response (TAR) element within the LTR, based on genetic variation and cellular phenotype, adds a layer of complexity to the processes that govern Tat-mediated proviral DNA-driven transcription and replication.