Replication-Competent Non-Human Viruses for Use in Clinical Gene Therapy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Replication-Competent Non-Human Viruses for Use in Clinical Gene Therapy REPLICATION‐COMPETENT NON‐HUMAN VIRUSES FOR USE IN CLINICAL GENE THERAPY: AN INVENTORY STUDY December 21, 2010 Danijela Koppers‐Lalic, PhD Rob C. Hoeben, PhD Department of Molecular Cell Biology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden, the Netherlands Page 2 of 155 CONTENTS: SAMENVATTING ........................................................................................................................................................................ 5 SUMMARY.................................................................................................................................................................................. 7 INTRODUCTION AND OUTLINE OF THIS STUDY ........................................................................................................................ 9 METHODS ................................................................................................................................................................................ 12 RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................................................................. 13 Table 1: Non‐human DNA viruses .................................................................................................................... 14 Table 2: Non‐human RNA viruses..................................................................................................................... 15 Figure 1. Outline of ERA elements for non‐GMO viruses ........................................................................... 17 Box 1: Issues to be covered in the ERA ............................................................................................................. 18 Table 3: Viruses for which veterinarian vaccines are available ................................................................... 20 Viruses placed in the ‘High’ relative environmental risk category................................................. 20 Viruses placed in the ‘Negligible’ relative environmental risk category....................................... 21 RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................................................................................................................................. 23 DESCRIPTION OF THERAPEUTIC VIRUSES................................................................................................................................24 Family Poxviridae ................................................................................................................................................. 24 Genus Orthopoxvirus .............................................................................................................................. 25 Genus Leporipoxvirus............................................................................................................................. 28 Genus Yatapoxvirus................................................................................................................................. 32 Genus Avipoxvirus .................................................................................................................................. 34 Family Herpesviridae............................................................................................................................................ 38 Genus Varicellovirus............................................................................................................................... 39 Bovine herpesvirus 1............................................................................................................. 39 Suid herpesvirus 1................................................................................................................. 42 Genus Rhadinovirus................................................................................................................................45 Herpesvirus saimiri............................................................................................................... 45 Bovine herpesvirus 4............................................................................................................. 48 Family Baculoviridae............................................................................................................................................ 56 Family Parvoviridae ............................................................................................................................................. 58 Genus Parvovirus ..................................................................................................................................... 58 Rodent parvovirus H‐1 & Minute virus of mice .............................................................. 58 Feline panleukopenia virus ................................................................................................. 63 Family Birnaviridae .............................................................................................................................................. 67 Family Reoviridae ................................................................................................................................................. 72 Family Paramyxoviridae...................................................................................................................................... 75 Genus Avulavirus .................................................................................................................................... 76 Genus Respirovirus ................................................................................................................................. 88 Family Rhabdoviridae .......................................................................................................................................... 98 Genus Vesiculovirus................................................................................................................................98 Vesicular stomatitis virus..................................................................................................... 98 Maraba virus......................................................................................................................... 101 Family Coronaviridae......................................................................................................................................... 105 Genus Coronavirus ................................................................................................................................ 106 Mouse Hepatitis virus......................................................................................................... 106 Feline Coronavirus .............................................................................................................. 109 Family Picornaviridae ........................................................................................................................................ 114 Genus Enterovirus.................................................................................................................................. 115 Genus Senecavirus................................................................................................................................. 118 Genus Cardiovirus ................................................................................................................................. 124 Family Togaviridae ............................................................................................................................................. 129 Genus Alphavirus .................................................................................................................................. 130 Sindbis virus......................................................................................................................... 130 Semliki Forest virus ............................................................................................................ 133 Family Retroviridae ............................................................................................................................................ 139 Genus Gammaretrovirus....................................................................................................................... 141 Genus Spumavirus................................................................................................................................. 147 APPENDIX 1............................................................................................................................................................................ 151 Page 3 of 155 The reliability of the information compiled for this study and its conclusions are the sole responsibility of the authors. The information contained in this report does not necessarily represent the views of the COGEM or the Leiden University Medical Center. Page 4 of 155 SAMENVATTING Alle levende organismen worden blootgesteld aan een verscheidenheid van virussen. Virussen infecteren gewoonlijk één of een beperkt aantal gastheersoorten. In zeldzame gevallen vinden infecties buiten de natuurlijke gastheersoorten plaats. Dit kan zich in deze nieuwe gastheer manifesteren als een nieuwe ziekte. In zeer zeldzame gevallen kan het virus zich blijvende vestigen in de nieuwe gastheersoort. In dit licht is voorzichtigheid geboden wanneer niet‐humane virussen, of hiervan afgeleide genetisch‐gemodificeerde virussen,
Recommended publications
  • First Detection of an Enterovirus C99 in a Captive Chimpanzee With
    First Detection of an Enterovirus C99 in a Captive Chimpanzee with Acute Flaccid Paralysis, from the Tchimpounga Chimpanzee Rehabilitation Center, Republic of Congo Illich Manfred Mombo, Nicolas Berthet, Alexander Lukashev, Tobias Bleicker, Sebastian Brünink, Lucas Léger, Rebeca Atencia, Debby Cox, Christiane Bouchier, Durand Patrick, et al. To cite this version: Illich Manfred Mombo, Nicolas Berthet, Alexander Lukashev, Tobias Bleicker, Sebastian Brünink, et al.. First Detection of an Enterovirus C99 in a Captive Chimpanzee with Acute Flaccid Paralysis, from the Tchimpounga Chimpanzee Rehabilitation Center, Republic of Congo. PLoS ONE, Public Library of Science, 2015, 10 (8), pp.e0136700. 10.1371/journal.pone.0136700. hal-02074621 HAL Id: hal-02074621 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02074621 Submitted on 8 Mar 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. RESEARCH ARTICLE First Detection of an Enterovirus C99 in a Captive Chimpanzee with Acute Flaccid Paralysis, from the Tchimpounga Chimpanzee Rehabilitation Center, Republic of Congo Illich Manfred Mombo1,2*, Nicolas Berthet1,3, Alexander N. Lukashev4, Tobias Bleicker5, Sebastian Brünink5, Lucas Léger2, Rebeca Atencia6, Debby Cox6, Christiane Bouchier7, Patrick Durand2, Céline Arnathau2, Lionel Brazier2, Joseph N. Fair8, Bradley S.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Distribution of Novel Rhinovirus Genotype
    DISPATCHES in resource-poor regions (1). Streptococcus pneumoniae Global Distribution and Haemophilus infl uenzae are important bacterial causes of ARI, although their impact is expected to decline with of Novel Rhinovirus increasing vaccine coverage. Collectively, however, virus- es dominate as causative agents in ARI. Viruses frequently Genotype implicated in ARI include infl uenza virus, respiratory syn- Thomas Briese,* Neil Renwick,* Marietjie Venter,† cytial virus, metapneumovirus, parainfl uenza virus, human Richard G. Jarman,‡ Dhrubaa Ghosh,§ enterovirus (HEV), and human rhinovirus (HRV). Sophie Köndgen,¶ Sanjaya K. Shrestha,# HRVs are grouped taxonomically into Human rhinovi- A. Mette Hoegh,** Inmaculada Casas,†† Edgard rus A (HRV-A) and Human rhinovirus B (HRV-B), 2 spe- Valerie Adjogoua,‡‡ cies within the family Picornaviridae (International Com- Chantal Akoua-Koffi ,‡‡ Khin Saw Myint,‡ David T. mittee on Taxonomy of Viruses database [ICTVdb]; http:// Williams,§§ Glenys Chidlow,¶¶ phene.cpmc.columbia.edu). These nonenveloped, positive- Ria van den Berg,† Cristina Calvo,## sense, single-stranded RNA viruses have been classifi ed se- Orienka Koch,† Gustavo Palacios,* rologically and on the basis of antiviral susceptibility pro- Vishal Kapoor,* Joseph Villari,* fi le, nucleotide sequence relatedness, and receptor usage (2). Samuel R. Dominguez,*** Kathryn V. Holmes,*** Phylogenetic analyses of viral protein VP4/VP2 and VP1 Gerry Harnett,¶¶ David Smith,¶¶ coding regions indicate the presence of 74 serotypes in ge- John S. Mackenzie,§§ Heinz Ellerbrok,¶ netic group A and 25 serotypes in genetic group B (2). Brunhilde Schweiger,¶ Kristian Schønning,** Isolated in the 1950s from persons with upper respi- Mandeep S. Chadha,§ Fabian H. Leendertz,¶ A.C. ratory tract symptoms (2,3), HRVs have become known Mishra,§ Robert V.
    [Show full text]
  • Stimulation of Tumor Necrosis Factor Release from Monocytic Cells by the A375 Human Melanoma Via Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor1
    [CANCER RESEARCH 50, 2673-2678. May 1, 1990] Stimulation of Tumor Necrosis Factor Release from Monocytic Cells by the A375 Human Melanoma via Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-stimulating Factor1 Massimo Sabatini,2 Jeffery Chavez, Gregory R. Mundy, and Lynda F. Bonewald Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas 78284- 7877 ABSTRACT cell line A375, the target cell line used to show that GM-CSF induced monocyte-mediated cytoxicity (3), we noted that con It has long been known that complex interactions occur between tumors ditioned medium harvested from A375 tumor cell cultures and normal host immune cells. The human melanoma cell line A375 has been used previously as an indicator cell for tumor cell cytotoxicity induced TNF production in human blood monocytes and the mediated by monocytes. During other studies on this tumor cell line, we human monocytoid cell line U937 by the secretion of a soluble noted that the conditioned media harvested from A375 cultures induced factor. By multiple criteria, we have identified this soluble factor both the human monocytoid cell line U937 and human blood monocytes which causes TNF production as GM-CSF. These results sug to release the cytokine tumor necrosis factor (TNF). We characterized gest that in this human tumor, production of GM-CSF by the this tumor factor which induced TNF release by monocytic cells. Purifi tumor may retard tumor growth by causing release of cytotoxic cation was performed using ammonium sulfate precipitation, ion exchange cytokines of host cell origin. (DEAE) chromaiography, gel filtration, and reversed-phase high per formance liquid chromatography.
    [Show full text]
  • Nongenetic Reactivation and Is Caused by the Action of the Uncoating Protein
    Poxviruses Dr. Ali Hashemi Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran Introduction Structure and Composition Poxviruses are the largest and most complex of viruses infecting humans. Poxviruses are large enough to be seen as featureless particles by light microscopy. By electron microscopy, they appear to be brick-shaped or ellipsoid particles. An outer lipoprotein membrane,or envelope, encloses a core and two structures of unknown function called lateral bodies Cont…. The core contains the large viral genome of linear double- stranded DNA. The DNA contains inverted terminal repeats of variable length, and the strands are connected at the ends by terminal hairpin loops. The chemical composition of a poxvirus resembles that of a bacterium. Vaccinia virus is composed predominantly of protein (90%), lipid (5%), and DNA (3%). Classification Poxviruses are divided into two subfamilies based on whether they infect vertebrate or insect hosts. Most of the poxviruses that can cause disease in humans are contained in the genera Orthopoxvirus and Parapoxvirus; there are also several that are classified in the genera Yatapoxvirus and Molluscipoxvirus. Cont… Cont… The orthopoxviruses have a broad host range affecting several vertebrates. They include ectromelia (mousepox), camelpox, cowpox, monkeypox, vaccinia, and variola (smallpox) viruses. Some poxviruses have a restricted host range and infect only rabbits (fibroma and myxoma) or only birds. Others infect mainly sheep and goats (sheeppox, goatpox) or cattle (pseudocowpox, or milker’s nodule). Poxvirus replication Poxviruses are unique among DNA viruses in that the entire multiplication cycle takes place in the cytoplasm of infected cells. Poxviruses are further distinguished from all other animal viruses by the fact that the uncoating step requires a newly synthesized, virus-encoded protein.
    [Show full text]
  • CBME TIME TABLE – II MBBS BLOCK 1: March to June-2021
    SRI ADICHUNCHANAGIRI SHIKSHANA TRUST (R.) BGS GLOBAL INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES (Affiliated to Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Bangalore) No. 67, BGS Health & Education City, Uttarahalli Road, Kengeri, Bangalore- 560060, Karnataka CBME TIME TABLE – II MBBS BLOCK 1: March TO June-2021 WEEK 1 DAY 8-11 11.30-12.30 12.30-1.30 2.00-4.00 4.00-5.00 Monday Postings L1 –PH: 1.1 OBG-LL1: OG 1.1: Integration: PH-A: PH: 1.1 MIC SDL 1 PSM: Birth rate, maternal 08/03/21 Batch A - Principles of mortality rate and morbidity Source of drug , drug information , Integration with Physiology and Gen Med pharmacology & drug compendia ,essential medicine, Pathology pharmacotherapeutics Formative Assessment: counterfeit drug , orphan drug. Batch B - Written/ Viva Assessment: Written/ viva Gen Sur Formative Assessment: MI 1.7.2 immune system Written/ Viva Batch C - Assessment: Written/ OBG Pharmacology –PH: 1.2: Therapeutic drug Monitoring & Clinical Trials Viva/MCQs Assessment: Short Notes Error! Not a valid embedded object. CM - B CM 7.2 - SGD-1: Cold chain system and its uses Assessment: Skill demo CM 7.3 - SGD-2: Integration Biochemistry Immunizing agents, national immunization schedule and vaccination strategies including vaccine development and implementation Assessment: MCQ/Viva Tuesday Postings L2 –PH: 1.3 & 1.11 FM: L1: SGD -1: FM- A: SGD-1 09/03/21 Batch A - Routes of Drug FM 1.1: Basics of Forensic PA 1.1 - Describe the role of a Gen Med administration medicine, Definition of FMT, pathologist in diagnosis and and its Sub Specialities management of disease Batch B - Formative Assessment: FM 2.8: Post Mortem Changes - ASSESSMENT: (written,viva-voce) Gen Sur Written/ Viva FM 1.2: History and Immediate & Early changes.
    [Show full text]
  • Epidemic Dynamics, Interactions and Predictability of Enteroviruses
    Epidemic dynamics, interactions and predictability of enteroviruses associated rsif.royalsocietypublishing.org with hand, foot and mouth disease in Japan Research Saki Takahashi1, C. Jessica E. Metcalf1,2, Yuzo Arima3, Tsuguto Fujimoto3, Hiroyuki Shimizu4, H. Rogier van Doorn5,6, Tan Le Van5, Yoke-Fun Chan7, Cite this article: Takahashi S et al. 2018 5,6 3 1,8 Epidemic dynamics, interactions and Jeremy J. Farrar , Kazunori Oishi and Bryan T. Grenfell predictability of enteroviruses associated with 1Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, and 2Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International hand, foot and mouth disease in Japan. Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA 3 4 J. R. Soc. Interface 15: 20180507. Infectious Disease Surveillance Center, and Department of Virology II, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2018.0507 5Oxford University Clinical Research Unit—Wellcome Trust Major Overseas Programme, National Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Ha Noi, Viet Nam 6Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK Received: 5 July 2018 7Department of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 8 Accepted: 20 August 2018 Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA ST, 0000-0001-5413-5507; CJEM, 0000-0003-3166-7521; YA, 0000-0002-8711-7636; TF, 0000-0002-4861-4349; HS, 0000-0002-2987-2377; HRvD, 0000-0002-9807-1821; TLV, 0000-0002-1791-3901; Y-FC, 0000-0001-7089-0510; JJF, 0000-0002-2700-623X; KO, 0000-0002-8637-0509 Subject Category: Life Sciences–Mathematics interface Outbreaks of hand, foot and mouth disease have been documented in Japan since 1963.
    [Show full text]
  • Theory, Practicals Block
    MVJ Medical College And Research Hospital Integrated and Aligned Time table Block -2 Teaching Program - Theory, Practicals Block - 2 01/07/2021 to 30/09/2021 8.30 - Time 11.30 - 12.30 12.30 - 1.30 1.30 - 2.00 2.00 - 4.00 2 TO 3 3 TO 4 4 TO 5 11.30 Lecture/ SGD Date Day clinicals Lecture/SGD class lunch Practicals /SGD/SDL OBG AETCOM SDL SPRTS /ECA class Microbiology Pathology Pharmacology Community Medicine SPORTS /ECA PA18.2 Acute PH 1.20 - Alcohol PH CM 1 PQLI, HDI calculation 1/7/21 THURS Leukemia (L) 1.23 - Drug Deaddiction (L) SGD Ph.1.24.1 physiology of Nephron MI3.1.1 (LECTURE ((SGD 1 )MI3.1.2 01) Introduction to Diarrheagenic E.coli PA 18.1 Non Leukemic 2/7/21 FRI gastrointestinal PA18.2 Chronic Leukemia (L) MI3.1.5 Viral Leucocyte disoreder Pandemic 2.4 infections diarhhea (SGD) IM22.1:- Enumerate the causes of hpercalcemia and distinguish the features of PTH us non PTH mediated hypercalcemia. IM22.2:- Describe the OG14.1 Maternal SU5.1 - Describe normal wound actiology, clinical pelvis: Diameters 3/7/21 SAT healing and factors affecting AETCOM2.4 manifestations, (Clinical pelvimetry healing diagnosis and clinical & Types of pelvis) approach to primary hyperthroidism. IM22.3:- Describe the approach to the management to ypercalcemia 4/7/21 SUN MI3.1.2 ,3,5 AE -3(BATCH A) Diarrheagenic E.coli, cholera,food PH 1.19.58 - 1.19.65 - PA 19.4 Hodgkins Lymphoma & poisoning Hanging drop preperation 5/7/21 MON NEURODEGENERATIVE PA 14 15 MHA & Dimorphic ( Pracs B) MICRO SDL Non Hodgkins Lymphoma (L) MI3.1.7 ,8,9 DOAP: Stool examination DISORDERS
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic and Phenotypic Characterization of a Rabies Virus Strain Isolated from a Dog in Tokyo, Japan in the 1940S
    viruses Article Genetic and Phenotypic Characterization of a Rabies Virus Strain Isolated from a Dog in Tokyo, Japan in the 1940s Tatsuki Takahashi 1, Maho Inukai 2, Michihito Sasaki 3 , Madlin Potratz 4, Supasiri Jarusombuti 5 , Yuji Fujii 6, Shoko Nishiyama 2, Stefan Finke 4 , Kentaro Yamada 7, Hiroki Sakai 1,6,8,9, Hirofumi Sawa 3, Akira Nishizono 7, Makoto Sugiyama 1,2,6 and Naoto Ito 1,2,6,9,* 1 The United Graduate School of Veterinary Sciences, Gifu University, Gifu 501-1193, Japan; [email protected] (T.T.); [email protected] (H.S.); [email protected] (M.S.) 2 Laboratory of Zoonotic Disease, Faculty of Applied Biological Sciences, Gifu University, Gifu 501-1193, Japan; [email protected] (M.I.); [email protected] (S.N.) 3 Division of Molecular Pathobiology, Research Center for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 001-0020, Japan; [email protected] (M.S.); [email protected] (H.S.) 4 Institute of Molecular Virology and Cell Biology, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, 17493 Greifswald, Germany; madlin.potratz@fli.de (M.P.); stefan.finke@fli.de (S.F.) 5 Graduate School of Bioagricultural Science, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan; [email protected] 6 Joint Graduate School of Veterinary Sciences, Gifu University, Gifu 501-1193, Japan; [email protected] 7 Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita 879-5593, Japan; [email protected] (K.Y.); [email protected] (A.N.) 8 Laboratory of Veterinary
    [Show full text]
  • 81943049.Pdf
    Cytokine 43 (2008) 181–186 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Cytokine journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/issn/10434666 The role of the chemokines MCP-1, GRO-a, IL-8 and their receptors in the adhesion of monocytic cells to human atherosclerotic plaques Charikleia Papadopoulou a, Valerie Corrigall b, Peter R. Taylor c, Robin N. Poston a,* a Centre for Cardiovascular Biology and Medicine, King’s College London, Guy’s Campus, London SE1 1UL, UK b Department of Rheumatology, King’s College London, London, UK c Academic Department of Surgery, King’s College London, London, UK article info abstract Article history: Monocyte adhesion to the arterial endothelium and subsequent migration into the intima are central Received 14 October 2007 events in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Previous experimental models have shown that chemo- Received in revised form 17 March 2008 kines can enhance monocyte–endothelial adhesion by activating monocyte integrins. Our study assesses Accepted 7 May 2008 the role of chemokines IL-8, MCP-1 and GRO-a, together with their monocyte receptors CCR2 and CXCR2 in monocyte adhesion to human atherosclerotic plaques. In an adhesion assay, a suspension of monocytic Keywords: U937 cells was incubated with human atherosclerotic artery sections and the levels of endothelial adhe- Atherosclerosis Chemokine sion were quantified. Adhesion performed in the presence of a monoclonal antibody to a chemokine, che- Monocyte mokine receptor or of an isotype matched control immunoglobulin, shows that antibodies to all Leukocyte–endothelial adhesion chemokines tested, as well as their receptors, inhibit adhesion compared to the control immunoglobulins. Cellular adhesion assay Immunohistochemistry demonstrated the expression of MCP-1, GRO-a and their receptors in the endo- thelial cells and intima of all atherosclerotic lesions.
    [Show full text]
  • Acute Flaccid Myelitis Associated with Enterovirus-D68 Infection in An
    Esposito et al. Virology Journal (2017) 14:4 DOI 10.1186/s12985-016-0678-0 CASEREPORT Open Access Acute flaccid myelitis associated with enterovirus-D68 infection in an otherwise healthy child Susanna Esposito1*, Giovanna Chidini2, Claudia Cinnante3, Luisa Napolitano2, Alberto Giannini2, Leonardo Terranova1, Hubert Niesters4, Nicola Principi1 and Edoardo Calderini2 Abstract Background: Reporting new cases of enterovirus (EV)-D68-associated acute flaccid myelitis (AFM) is essential to understand how the virus causes neurological damage and to characterize EV-D68 strains associated with AFM. Case presentation: A previously healthy 4-year-old boy presented with sudden weakness and limited mobility in his left arm. Two days earlier, he had an upper respiratory illness with mild fever. At admission, his physical examination showed that the child was febrile (38.5 °C) and alert but had a stiff neck and weakness in his left arm, which was hypotonic and areflexic. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) examination showed a mild increase in white blood cell count (80/mm3,41% neutrophils) and a slightly elevated protein concentration (76 gm/dL). Bacterial culture and molecular biology tests for detecting viral infection in CSF were negative. The patient was then treated with intravenous ceftriaxone and acyclovir. Despite therapy, within 24 h, the muscle weakness extended to all four limbs, which exhibited greatly reduced mobility. Due to his worsening clinical prognosis, the child was transferred to our Pediatric Intensive Care Unit; at admission he was diagnosed with acute flaccid paralysis of all four limbs. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was negative, except for a focal signal alteration in the dorsal portion of the medulla oblongata, also involving the pontine tegmentum, whereas spine MRI showed an extensive signal alteration of the cervical and dorsal spinal cord reported as myelitis.
    [Show full text]
  • By: Evita Mayasari, Dr., Mkes. Microbiology Department Medical School University of Sumatera Utara
    PART 1 by: Evita Mayasari, dr., MKes. Microbiology Department Medical School University of Sumatera Utara 1 Zoonoses (“zoonosis” is singular) are diseases the agents of which are transmitted between vertebrate animals and people. animals play an essential role in maintaining the infection in nature, and man is only an accidental host. Reservoir (of zoonoses): vertebrate that provides a pathogen with adequate conditions for survival and multiplication and opportunity for transmission. 2 Argentine Hemorrhagic Fever Ebola Hemorrhagic Fever (EHF) (AHF) Encephalomyocarditis (EMC) Bolivian Hemorrhagic Fever Hantavirus Pulmonary (BHF) Syndrome (HPS) Bovine Papular Stomatitis (BPS) Hantavirus Renal Syndromes California (Lacrosse) Herpesvirus simiae (B) Infection Encephalitis Influenza Japanese (B) Encephalitis (JBE) Colorado Tick Fever (CTF) Kyasanur Forest Disease (KFD) Contagious Ecthyma Lassa Fever (LF) Cowpox Louping Ill Crimean-CongoHemorrhagic Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Fever (CCHF) (LCM) Eastern Equine Encephalitis Marburg Disease (EEE) Monkeypox 3 Murray Valley Encephalitis Sicilian Sandfly Fever (MVE) Tanapox Nairobi Sheep Disease Venezuelan Equine (NSD) Newcastle Disease Encephalitis (VEE) (ND) Vesicular Stomatitis (VS) Omsk Hemorrhagic Fever Viral Hepatitis Type A , B, C, (OHF) a D, E Pseudocowpox Wesselsbron Disease Rabies (WSL) Rift Valley Fever (RVF) Western Equine Russian Spring-Summer Encephalitis (WEE) Encephalitis (RSSE) West Nile Fever (WNF) St. Louis Encephalitis (SLE) Yabapox Yellow Fever (YF) Zoonoses: Recognition, Control, and Prevention. 1995, Iowa State University Press 4 >50,000 DEATHS PER YEAR WORLD WIDE Rabies virus particles 5 Family:Rhabdoviridae Genus: Lyssavirus Species :Rabies virus helical, enveloped Group V (( -)ssRNA) , Structure of rabies virus 11-12 kb 6 Serotype 1: The category that includes most of the viruses that cause rabies in man and animals, as well as laboratory fixed viruses.
    [Show full text]
  • Role of Catalase in Monocytic Differentiation of U937 Cells by TPA: Hydrogen Peroxide As a Second Messenger
    Leukemia (2009) 23, 761–769 & 2009 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 0887-6924/09 $32.00 www.nature.com/leu ORIGINAL ARTICLE Role of catalase in monocytic differentiation of U937 cells by TPA: hydrogen peroxide as a second messenger T Yamamoto1, N Sakaguchi1, M Hachiya1, F Nakayama1, M Yamakawa2 and M Akashi1 1Department of Radiation Emergency Medicine, The Research Center for Radiation Emergency Medicine, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba-city, Chiba, Japan and 2Department of Pathology, Yamagata University Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata-city, Yamagata, Japan Human promonocytic cell line U937 cells can be induced to atherosclerosis.4,5 Internalization of foreign substances by differentiate into macrophages by treatment with 12-O-tetra- macrophages is mediated through distinct surface receptors that decanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA). TPA treatment induced the expression of the monocytic differentiation markers CD11b and recognize their targets, such as microorganisms, tumor cells and CD36, with concomitant morphological changes. Moreover, cellular debris. Following phagocytosis, macrophages synthe- TPA enhanced reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation in size and release reactive oxygen species (ROS), a process called these cells, and phagocytic ability was also stimulated during ‘respiratory burst.’ Thus, the generation of ROS is important differentiation. The antioxidant agent N-acetyl-L-cysteine inhib- for much of the microbicidal and antitumor activity of ited the TPA-induced differentiation of U937 cells. TPA treat- macrophages. ment decreased the expression level of catalase, which catalyzes the decomposition of hydrogen peroxide (H O )to Since the discovery of ROS, primary focus has been directed 2 2 at the oxidative damage to biologic macromolecules including H2O and O2.
    [Show full text]