DOCSLIB.ORG

Common Look & Feel

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Common Look & Feel Acknowledgement Many people deserve credit for creating this document. Special thanks to the Internet Common Look and Feel Working Group leaders for their considerable contribution. The Internet Common Look and Feel Working Group, an inter-institutional, multidisciplinary committee composed of approximately 75 members, provided support for this document. The Working Group is charged with providing a forum for consultation on government-wide issues associated with developing Internet standards that enhance information and service delivery, address universal accessibility issues, and strengthen federal presence and visibility. It does this by providing advice to the Treasury Board Secretariat for developing government-wide policy and procedures for use on Government of Canada (GoC) sites. The Common Look and Feel Working Group also acts as a government-wide forum for co-ordinating inter- institutional activities related to using common look and feel recommendations; sharing and exchanging best practices; maintaining awareness of developments related to service delivery, universal accessibility, federal identity issues; and, simplifying the process of adopting new recommendations in Web development and maintenance. CL&F Co-chairs: Alan Way, Chair Treasury Board Secretariat Donna Wood, Chair Public Works and Government Services Canada Common Look and Feel Report Prepared by: Alan Way Treasury Board Secretariat Grant Johnson Treasury Board Secretariat Marilyn Smith National Research Council Special Thanks: Cal Becker Industry Canada Guy Belanger Human Resources Development Canada Nancy Brodie National Library of Canada Karyn Curtis Transport Canada Barbara Dundas Transport Canada Chuck Letourneau Industry Canada Joe Ricciardi Treasury Board Secretariat Committee Members: Duncan Bailey Treasury Board Secretariat Pèter Balogh Public Works and Government Services Canada Eileen Bays-Coutts Finance Canada Suzanne Beaudoin Public Works and Government Services Canada Cal Becker Industry Canada Guy Belanger Human Resources Development Canada D.J. Blackwood Revenue Canada Sylvie Boileau Communication Research Centre Canada Nancy Brodie National Library of Canada Glen Brunton Industry Canada Richard Caron Canadian Heritage Alain Calvet Office of the Commissioner of Official Languages Edith Core Industry Canada Sharron Curley Public Works and Government Services Canada Karyn Curtis Transport Canada Ian Darragh Canadian International Development Agency Judy David Public Works and Government Services Canada Nancy Davy Treasury Board Secretariat Doug DeHart Department of National Defence Karen Donaldson Transport Canada Wayne Duford Canadian Heritage Barbara Dundas Transport Canada Pierre Gagnier Public Service Commission Chantal Gauthier National Library of Canada Annick Gauvin-Fleurant Canadian Space Agency Denis Gratton Privy Council Office Common Look and Feel for Internet: Report and Recommendations 2000 01 06 Terry Harding Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Pauline Hawkes Public Works and Government Services Canada Dave Huddlestone Canadian Heritage Grant Johnson Treasury Board Secretariat Mark Kennedy Natural Resources Canada Jane Kralik Industry Canada Carol Lemery Public Works and Government Services Canada John MacCraken Statistics Canada Peter Martin Industry Canada Scott McGregor Industry Canada Grace Moores Industry Canada Lynne Mulvihill Industry Canada Margo Nielson Citizenship and Immigration Canada Daniela Planka Status of Women Canada Judy Poirier Citizenship and Immigration Canada Scott Prieur Fisheries and Oceans Charles Reynolds Health Canada Daryl Rock Human Resources Development Canada Kate Seguin Revenue Canada Duncan Shaw Human Resources Development Canada Chis Stevenson Public Works and Government Services Canada Peter Smith Industry Canada Craig Taylor Canadian Heritage Paula Tozer Environment Canada Linda Wood Public Works and Government Services Canada Deane Zeeman Finance Canada Common Look and Feel for Internet: Report and Recommendations 2000 01 06 Update Common Look and Feel migrates to Government On-line In the fall of 1999, through the Speech from the Throne, the government set the ambitious goal of providing Canadians with access to all government information and services on-line, at the time and place of their choosing. Despite enormous diversities in geography, demography, and physical and technological abilities, all Canadians are united by a need to know about programs and services offered to them by their government that are relevant in their daily lives. The Government On-line (GOL) initiative seeks to address that need by increasing the amount of information available through Internet technologies and by improving overall access to the vast resources produced by government institutions. Under the direction of the Treasury Board Secretariat Advisory Committee, the Information Management Subcommittee (TIMS) has undertaken to champion GOL to ensure that policies and procedures for effective government-wide implementation are made available. Obviously, the scope of the GOL initiative is broad, and there are many issues to consider. With a long history in information management and information technology assessment and implementation, the Chief Information Officer Branch (CIOB) has the skills and expertise necessary to spearhead this multifaceted initiative on behalf of TIMS. As champion of GOL, CIOB will draw upon a wide range of specialists and stakeholders to ensure close alignment of business and technology requirements of both the electronic service delivery/GOL and the Strategic IM/IT Infrastructure initiatives. Making it easy to obtain GoC information via the Internet is one aspect of the larger electronic service delivery (ESD) model that will make up GOL. In recognition of the need to create a unified approach to the delivery of electronic on-line products and services for Canadians, TBS is transferring from the Service and Innovation sector (S&I) to the CIOB, the Common Look and Feel for Internet (CL&F) initiative. The CL&F initiative has gained tremendous support from both CL&F Working Group members and GoC institutions over the past 20 months. CIOB will continue to work with the (S&I) Federal Identity Program (FIP), which has established preliminary guidelines for CL&F implementation, to ensure issues associated with the FIP policies and programs are effectively addressed within both CL&F and GOL. In addition, S&I will continue to focus on complementary non-electronic channels and the Service Canada pilots. CIOB and S&I will collaborate on all areas to ensure consistency across all service channels. Many GoC institutions have begun to implement elements of CL&F during the course of regular Web maintenance and new site development. Already, the GoC is beginning to present a more unified visual design and navigational approach to Canadians. With this report and recommendations, an attempt has been made to address the issues and concerns raised by institutions following the release of Draft 1 in April 1999. The S&I Sector is confident institutions will have a clearer sense of how to begin CL&F implementation. Although some aspects of larger issues remain unresolved, these are clearly identified, along with an overview of the progress made to date in investigating options and reaching final conclusions. Common Look and Feel for Internet: Report and Recommendations 2000 01 06 Common Look and Feel for Internet: Report and Recommendations 2000 01 06 Table of Contents Index of Recommendations 1 Introduction 5 Background 7 Statement of Objectives 11 Section 1: Communication A Citizen-centred Approach 13 Section 2: Identification Visibility and Recognition 21 Section 3: Navigation Common Sense Connections 33 Section 4: Content Information Design 41 Section 5: Enabling and Emerging Technologies Reaching All Canadians 47 Glossary 55 Figures 1-20 63 Common Look and Feel for Internet: Report and Recommendations 2000 01 06 Common Look and Feel for Internet: Report and Recommendations 2000 01 06 1 Index of Recommendations 1 All Web pages on all GoC Web sites should incorporate navigational buttons that allow users to proceed through the site in the language of their choice, or to access identical information in the alternate official language. 15 (a) Language buttons on Welcome Pages should be displayed in the manner indicated to ensure visual equality and continuity within the visual standards of CL&F. 15 (b) Language navigation buttons on all Content Pages should be incorporated in the mandatory menu bar. The language button should hyperlink directly to the identical content in the alternate official language. 15 2 All messages generated by GoC web servers, including instructions, permissions, confirmations and errors, must comply with official languages requirements, meaning the content of the message must appear in both official languages. 15 3 All text equivalents must be given in the language of the Web page in which they are embedded. 15 4 The mandatory GILS elements that make up the metatag for any given Web page must correspond to the official language of the page itself. 15 5 All GoC Web sites should comply with W3C Priority 1 and Priority 2 checkpoints to ensure sites can be easily accessed by the widest possible audience. 17 6 All GoC Web sites shall incorporate Welcome Pages at the main point of entry to the site and at any point at which users are introduced to a new sub-site for a specific program or service. Each Welcome Page shall incorporate three key elements: federal identifiers, institutional
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Title: General Study 03 – Canadian Legislation, Standards, Policies, Regulations, and Guidelines Relevant to the Interpares 3 Project
    Title: General Study 03 – Canadian Legislation, Standards, Policies, Regulations, and Guidelines Relevant to the InterPARES 3 Project Status: Final (public) Version: 2.4 Date Created: May 2008 Last Revised: May 2013 Author: The InterPARES 3 Project, TEAM Canada Writer(s): Donald C. Force School of Library, Archival and Information Studies, The University of British Columbia Suher Zaher-Mazawi School of Library, Archival and Information Studies, The University of British Columbia Joanna Hammerschmidt School of Library, Archival and Information Studies, The University of British Columbia Project Component: Research URL: http://www.interpares.org/ip3/display_file.cfm?doc= ip3_canada_gs03_canadian_standards.pdf General Study 03 - Canadian Legislation Relevant to InterPARES 3 (v2.4) Document Control Version history Version Date By Version notes 1.0 2008-09-22 D. Force, Discussion draft prepared following identification S. Zaher-Mazawi of action items for GS03 at TEAM Canada Plenary Workshop 02. 2.0 2008-11-24 D. Force Revised draft to incorporate provincial legislation. 2.1 2008-01-08 R. Preston Copy and minor content editing. 2.2 2010-06-29 J. Hammerschmidt Reviewed and updated content. 2.3 2010-10-14 R. Preston Minor copy and content editing. 2.4 2013-05-03 R. Preston Minor copy editing. InterPARES 3 Project, TEAM Canada i General Study 03 - Canadian Legislation Relevant to InterPARES 3 (v2.4) Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Brand Guidelines Version 3.4 | October 2018 Introduction
    1.0 Section Secondary line Section title Brand Guidelines Version 3.4 | October 2018 Introduction Hi. Welcome to our brand guidelines. This is us: Explorers. Adventurers. Storytellers. Canadians. Our personality will spark the curiousity of travellers everywhere and inspire them to visit Canada. Destination Canada Brand Guidelines – October 2018 – Version 3.4 ii Contents 1.0 Our story 1 2.0 Our toolkit 4 3.0 Our Brand in Action 36 Our personality 2 Overview of elements 5 Marketing logo in action: online Uniquely Canadian 3 Logos overview 6 advertising 37 Language versions 7 Marketing logo in action: video 38 Corporate logo in action: stationery 39 Choosing the right logos 8 Marketing logo: colour versions 9 PowerPoint presentations 40 Reports 41 Marketing logo: minimum size and clear space 10 Websites 42 Marketing logo: things to avoid 11 Animation and video 43 Corporate logo: colour versions 12 Tradeshows and events 44 Corporate logo: minimum size Tradeshow example: RVC 2018 45 and clear space 13 RVC wordmark guidelines 47 Corporate logo: things to avoid 14 Tradeshow and event checklist 48 Canada wordmark: colour versions 15 Canada wordmark: minimum size, clear space and relative scale 16 Colour overview 18 Contacts 49 Colour palette 19 Glossary 50 Colour applied 20 Typography 21 Primary typefaces 22 Secondary typeface 23 Websites: typography 24 Photography overview 25 Photography style 26 Photography style: things to avoid 27 Photography credits 28 Writing overview 29 Writing style 30 Writing tone 31 Writing for travellers 32 Writing checklist 33 Map 34 Our brand checklist 35 Destination Canada Brand Guidelines – October 2018 – Version 3.4 iii 1.0 Section Secondary line Section title Our Story 1.0 Our story © Tundra North Tours © Tundra 1 1.0 Our story Our personality Canada is intriguing, and refreshingly different from what you would expect.
    [Show full text]
  • Alignment of Spending with the Whole-Of-Government Framework
    Canadian Food Inspection Agency 2016–17 Departmental Results Report Approved: The Honourable Ginette Petitpas Taylor, PC, MP Minister of Health For the period ending March 31, 2017 © 2017 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada (Canadian Food Inspection Agency), all rights reserved. Use without permission is prohibited. CFIA P0932-17 Catalogue No.: A101-12E-PDF ISSN 2561-0775 Cette publication est aussi disponible en français 2016–17 Departmental Results Report Table of Contents Minister’s message . 1 Results at a glance . 3 Raison d’être, mandate and role: who we are and what we do . 5 Raison d’être . 5 Mandate and role . 5 Operating context and key risks . 7 Operating context . 7 Key risks . 8 Results: what we achieved . 13 Programs . 13 Food Safety Program . 13 Animal Health and Zoonotics Program . 22 Plant Resources Program . 29 International Collaboration and Technical Agreements . 33 Internal Services . 39 Analysis of trends in spending and human resources . 43 Actual expenditures . 43 Actual human resources . 45 Expenditures by vote . 46 Alignment of spending with the whole-of-government framework . 47 Financial statements and financial statements highlights . 48 Financial statements . 48 Financial statements highlights . 48 Supplementary Information . 49 Corporate information . 49 Organizational Profile . 49 Reporting framework . 50 Supporting information on lower-level programs . 51 Supplementary information tables . 51 Federal tax expenditures . 51 Organizational contact information . 52 Appendix: definitions . 53 Endnotes . 57 Canadian Food Inspection Agency i 2016–17 Departmental Results Report Minister’s message I invite you to read the 2016-17 Departmental Results Report for the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) . In it, you will find the many ways that the CFIA works to protect Canadians through safeguarding the food supply and the plant and animal resources on which it depends .
    [Show full text]
  • Oversight of Government of Canada Advertising
    OVERSIGHT OF GOVERNMENT OF CANADA ADVERTISING Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts Kelly Block, Chair MARCH 2021 43rd PARLIAMENT, 2nd SESSION Published under the authority of the Speaker of the House of Commons SPEAKER’S PERMISSION The proceedings of the House of Commons and its Committees are hereby made available to provide greater public access. The parliamentary privilege of the House of Commons to control the publication and broadcast of the proceedings of the House of Commons and its Committees is nonetheless reserved. All copyrights therein are also reserved. Reproduction of the proceedings of the House of Commons and its Committees, in whole or in part and in any medium, is hereby permitted provided that the reproduction is accurate and is not presented as official. This permission does not extend to reproduction, distribution or use for commercial purpose of financial gain. Reproduction or use outside this permission or without authorization may be treated as copyright infringement in accordance with the Copyright Act. Authorization may be obtained on written application to the Office of the Speaker of the House of Commons. Reproduction in accordance with this permission does not constitute publication under the authority of the House of Commons. The absolute privilege that applies to the proceedings of the House of Commons does not extend to these permitted reproductions. Where a reproduction includes briefs to a Standing Committee of the House of Commons, authorization for reproduction may be required from the authors in accordance with the Copyright Act. Nothing in this permission abrogates or derogates from the privileges, powers, immunities and rights of the House of Commons and its Committees.
    [Show full text]
  • Brand Guidelines Version 3.3 | January 2017 Introduction
    1.0 Section Secondary line Section title Brand Guidelines Version 3.3 | January 2017 Introduction Hi. Welcome to our brand guidelines. This is us: Explorers. Adventurers. Storytellers. Canadians. Our personality will spark the curiousity of travellers everywhere and inspire them to visit Canada. Destination Canada Brand Guidelines – January 2017 – Version 3.3 ii Contents 1.0 Our story 1 2.0 Our toolkit 6 3.0 Our Brand in Action 36 Our personality 2 Overview of elements 7 Marketing logo in action: online Uniquely Canadian 3 Logos overview 8 advertising 37 Who our brands speak with 4 Language versions 9 Marketing logo in action: video 38 Corporate logo in action: stationery 39 Marketing experiences 5 Choosing the right logos 10 Marketing logo: colour versions 11 PowerPoint presentations 40 Reports 41 Marketing logo: minimum size and clear space 12 Websites 42 Marketing logo: things to avoid 13 Tradeshows and events 43 Corporate logo: colour versions 14 Tradeshow example 44 Corporate logo: minimum Tradeshow and event checklist 45 size and clear space 15 Corporate logo: things to avoid 16 Canada wordmark: colour versions 17 Contacts 46 Canada wordmark: minimum size, clear space and relative scale 18 Glossary 47 Canada wordmark: relative scale continued 19 Colour overview 20 Colour palette 21 Colour applied 22 Typography 23 Primary typeface 24 Secondary typeface 25 Photography overview 26 Photography style 27 Photography credits 28 Writing overview 29 Writing style 30 Writing tone 31 Writing for travellers 32 Writing checklist 33 Map 34 Our brand checklist 35 Destination Canada Brand Guidelines – January 2017 – Version 3.3 iii 1.0 Section Secondary line Section title Our Story 1.0 Our story 1 1.0 Our story Our personality Canada is intriguing, and refreshingly different from what you would expect.
    [Show full text]
  • Read Guidelines
    Principles and Procedures for Geographical Naming 2011 Geographical Names Board of Canada Available without charge from: GNBC Secretariat 615 Booth Street Ottawa ON Canada K1A 0E9 Telephone: 613-992-3892 Fax: 613-943-8282 E-mail: [email protected] Web site: geonames.NRCan.gc.ca Information contained in this publication or product may be reproduced, in part or in whole, and by any means, for personal or public non-commercial purposes, without charge or further permission, unless otherwise specified. You are asked to: - exercise due diligence in ensuring the accuracy of the materials reproduced; - indicate the complete title of the materials reproduced, and the name of the author organization; and - indicate that the reproduction is a copy of an official work that is published by the Government of Canada and that the reproduction has not been produced in affiliation with, or with the endorsement of, the Government of Canada. Commercial reproduction and distribution is prohibited except with written permission from the Government of Canada’s copyright administrator, Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC). For more information, contact PWGSC at 613-996-6886 or at [email protected]. © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2012 Cat. No. M86-23/2012 (Print) ISBN 978-1-100-52417-7 Cat. No. M86-23/2012E-PDF (On-line) ISBN 978-1-100-13735-3 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE 3 GUIDING PRINCIPLES 4 Principle 1 Names governed by statutory authority 4 Principle 2 Names in general public use 5 Principle 3 Names given
    [Show full text]
  • Temporary Signs and Markings: Guide for Federal Workspaces
    Temporary signs and markings Guide for federal workspaces May 2020 Version 2 INTRODUCTION SIGNS AND FLOOR MARKINGS This guide outlines processes and requirements for Templates for a temporary class of signs and floor planning, designing, producing, purchasing and markings have been developed to address the installing temporary operational signs in federal current public health environment. These signs facilities in response to COVID-19. Operational and floor markings combine the standard colours signs are intended to convey critical information, used to indicate caution (yellow and black). They such as mandatory protocols, to support the safe are designed to be compact and concise with a movement of employees and the public within graphic symbol and bilingual message. The design federal facilities. also provides departments with the flexibility to make modifications based on operational needs, While this guide is primarily designed for including printing in black and white. Electronic accommodations teams, consistent implementation templates are available. requires the cooperation of custodian and tenant facility managers, as well as procurement and The official symbols of the Government of Canada communications teams. This system has also been are not added to signs, except for COVID-related created to ensure that accessibility needs are notices posted in areas leading up to the entrance addressed. of a federal facility. See figure 3 This signage system has been developed by the Signs Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (TBS) and aligns with the Federal Identity Program and These signs address site-specific needs by industry standards. TBS will ensure that providing critical information or mandatory information and links are updated as needed.
    [Show full text]
  • Canada's 150Th Birthday
    Canada’s 150th Birthday: Celebrating with Marks, Designs and Signs June 27, 2017 By Tamara Céline Winegust Happy Canada Day! Did you know that there are rules for using and displaying many Canadian symbols? An overview of some rules governing the use of such marks, designs, and signs is below. The 11-Point Maple Leaf The public is generally free to use the 11-pointed maple leaf (i.e. the one that appears on the Canadian Flag) in a design or trademark provided such use conforms to “good taste”. A general permission was set out in a 1965 order of the Privy Council (Order no. 1965-1623), passed in preparation for Canada’s 1967 centennial celebrations. While the leaf design may be incorporated into a trademark, no rights will be acquired in the maple leaf itself, and the mark owner cannot prevent third parties from using the maple leaf. Interestingly, the same Order in Council provided that for the period of 1965 to 1968, not only the maple leaf, but also the Canadian Flag, the Arms of Canada, and pictorial depictions of uniformed members of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (known colloquially as “Mounties”), could be used on souvenirs and other commemorative items, as well as in commemorative displays, without permission from the Canadian government. This is not the case today. The Canadian Flag, Coat of Arms, and the Mounties Specific permission must be obtained from the government of Canada to reproduce or adapt the Flag or Arms, and from the RCMP for any images of Mounties, in connection with commercial or business activities, because these symbols are considered “prohibited marks” under section 9(1) of the Trade-marks Act, RSC 1985, c T-13.
    [Show full text]
  • Design Standards for the Promotion of Parks Canada Places and Products
    Design Standards for the Promotion of Parks Canada Places and Products Version 5 Design Standards for the Promotion of Parks Canada Places and Products Version 5 September 2014 © Her Majesty the Queen in right of Canada, represented by the Chief Executive Officer of Parks Canada, 2014. Table of Contents Overview . 1 Products Components Print Advertisements . 21 Identity Elements . 5 Web Advertisements . 31 Proportional Measurement System . 6 Publications . 35 Federal Identity Program . 8 Portable Displays . 39 Unique Identifier . 11 Resources Font Palette . 14 Tone of Voice . 46 Colour Palette . 15 Guidelines for Preparing Advertisements . 50 Photography . 19 Timelines and Checklist . 51 Design Standards for the Promotion of 1 Parks Canada Places and Products Overview These design standards are informed by a series Changes to the Parks Canada look • The Parks Canada signature and the Canada of recommendations made to Parks Canada by The following modifications have been made to the wordmark are always presented in one colour, Veritas in a report titled “Strategic Approach for Parks Canada look on promotional products: either black or white. The flag symbol no longer Promotion of Parks Canada Places and Products”. appears in red on Parks Canada promotional • The Parks Canada web address is no longer products. placed next to the beaver symbol. A Government It is important to understand that the Parks of Canada Web Renewal initiative is underway, • The beaver symbol will only appear once on the Canada brand is not changing. We are not revising which will result in all web content eventually cover of Parks Canada products. our vision. The essence, personality and attributes being accessed through a single Canada.ca site.
    [Show full text]
  • THE MYTH of OLYMPIC UNITY: the DILEMMA of DIVERSITY, OLYMPIC OPPRESSION, and the POLITICS of DIFFERENCE by Mark Arthur Devitt A
    THE MYTH OF OLYMPIC UNITY: THE DILEMMA OF DIVERSITY, OLYMPIC OPPRESSION, AND THE POLITICS OF DIFFERENCE by Mark Arthur Devitt A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Graduate Department of Theory and Policy Studies in Education Ontario Institute for Studies in Education University of Toronto © Copyright by Mark Arthur Devitt 2010 THE MYTH OF OLYMPIC UNITY: THE DILEMMA OF DIVERSITY, OLYMPIC OPPRESSION, AND THE POLITICS OF DIFFERENCE Master of Arts 2010 Mark Arthur Devitt Department of Theory and Policy Studies in Education University of Toronto Abstract The dilemma of diversity is the tension that exists when prescriptive claims are required across reasonable pluralism. Scholar and philosopher Dwight Boyd believes that the dilemma of diversity must be addressed for the continued health of multicultural societies, and suggests that the solution can be found through democratic reciprocity. Though the International Olympic Committee (IOC) markets unity and peace through its Olympic Games, does the Olympics relieve the dilemma of diversity? By critically examining the IOC‘s historic and recent treatment of Aboriginals, its encouragement of divisive nationalism, and its educational programs, it is clear that the IOC does not embrace reasonable pluralism. The IOC‘s public pedagogy is one that conceals its dominance through diversity. In exposing this dominance, I will argue that the IOC must embrace democratic reciprocity that allows for conversation across difference. Adopting an authentic acceptance of difference will alleviate the IOC‘s propagation of Western ideology through neo-imperialism. ii Acknowledgements I would like to thank Dr. Megan Boler and Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Learningfrom SARS
    Learningfrom SARS Renewal of Public Health in Canada . Learningfrom SARS Renewal of Public Health in Canada A report of the National Advisory Committee on SARS and Public Health October 2003 . i . The members* of the National Advisory Committee on SARS and Public Health were: • Dr. David Naylor, Dean of Medicine at the University of Toronto (Chair) • Dr. Sheela Basrur, Medical Officer of Health, City of Toronto • Dr. Michel G. Bergeron, Chairman of the Division of Microbiology and of the Infectious Diseases Research Centre of Laval University, Quebec City • Dr. Robert C. Brunham, Medical Director of the British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver • Dr. David Butler-Jones, Medical Health Officer for Sun Country, and Consulting Medical Health Officer for Saskatoon Health Regions, Regina • Gerald Dafoe, Chief Executive Officer of the Canadian Public Health Association, Ottawa • Dr. Mary Ferguson-Paré, Vice-President, Professional Affairs and Chief Nurse Executive at University Health Network, Toronto • Frank Lussing, Past President and CEO of York Central Hospital, Richmond Hill • Dr. Allison McGeer, Director of Infection Control, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto • Kaaren R. Neufeld, Executive Director and Chief Nursing Officer at St. Boniface Hospital, Winnipeg • Dr. Frank Plummer, Scientific Director of the Health Canada National Microbiology Laboratory, Winnipeg (ex officio) * The Committee was materially assisted through corresponding members of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization. This publication can also be made available in/on computer diskette/large print/audio-cassette/Braille upon request. For further information or to obtain additional copies, please contact: Publications Health Canada Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0K9 SARS Tel.: (613) 954-5995 Fax: (613) 941-5366 ©Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2003 Cat.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview To, and Links to Legislation, Regulations and Policies
    Treasury Board of Canada Secrétariat du Conseil du Trésor Secretariat du Canada FRAMEWORK FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF INFORMATION IN THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA Overview to, and Links to Legislation, Regulations and Policies DOCUMENT VERSION 6.2 March 31, 2006 Information Management Strategies Division Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat Canada Framework For the Management of Information Overview of, and Links to Legislation, Regulations and Policies Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................................................3 1.1 TITLE................................................................................................................................................................................. 3 1.2 DOCUMENT REVISION HISTORY ................................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 CONTEXT.......................................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.4 SCOPE............................................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.5 APPLICABILITY................................................................................................................................................................ 3 2. DESCRIPTION.....................................................................................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]