DOCSLIB.ORG

2021-02-16 Health Med HF813 and HF907

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2021-02-16 Health Med HF813 and HF907 924 17th Ave SE Apt. 303 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55414 Sensible policies, safer communities. Representative Tina Liebling, Chair Health Finance and Policy Committee 477 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. St. Paul, MN 55155 Re: House Files 813 (Edelson) / HF 907 (Gomez) Adding raw cannabis to the medical program; enhancing medical cannabis patient protections Dear Chair Liebling and Members of the HHS Policy Committee, I write today on behalf of Sensible Change Minnesota, in support of House Files 813 and 907. We first want to thank Representatives Gomez and Edelson for pursuing these pieces of legislation to enhance patient protections and make medical cannabis more affordable and accessible for Minnesota’s medical cannabis patients. Sensible Change Minnesota is a non-profit that believes our communities are safer When We create sensible drug policies. We have focused much of our efforts over the past three years on improving the medical cannabis program and are fully supportive of HF 813 and HF 907. Raw Cannabis (HF 813) This is the third year that we have pursued this legislation and appreciate the support in the House of Representatives the addition of raw cannabis has received in the past. This provision has passed in the House the past two years, and we encourage your continued support for to make Minnesota’s medical cannabis program more accessible and affordable. Patient Protections (HF 907) This bill seeks to enhance the protections that Minnesota’s medical cannabis patients are afforded under the law. Due to the incredibly restrictive nature of Minnesota’s program, and the cost of medical cannabis, patients have found themselves needing to supplement, or fully supply, their medical cannabis from the illicit market. Not only can this get them banned from the program for life, it has also resulted in criminal charges for patients, including felonies, for possession of cannabis products that are not program compliant or are not under 1.5 ounces of flower. The first section of this bill seeks to remove the lifetime ban and reduce it to one year, so that patients who may find themselves in a tough situation are afforded a second chance. The fourth section seeks to give patients the opportunity to tell the Court and a jury, if charged in a criminal matter for simple possession, that their use of cannabis is for medical purposes. One lesser-known issue patients face is termination by employers and eviction by landlords for either a failed drug test or simply for their status as a registered medical cannabis patient. We have talked to many patients who have had job offers rescinded, or have been fired or evicted, that cannot afford an attorney to pursue discrimination claims against employers and landlords. Sections three and four of HF 907 seek to “give teeth” to the anti-discrimination provisions by prohibiting retaliation, and providing changemn.org 924 17th Ave SE Apt. 303 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55414 Sensible policies, safer communities. injunctive relief, monetary damages, and attorney’s fees for entities found to have discriminated against a patient. It is our hope that these provisions will help balance the power between a patient, who is likely disabled, and their employer or landlord who may discriminate regardless of the existing law. We are hopeful With these provisions set forth by Representatives Gomez and Edelson, We can drastically improve patient experience, access and affordability for patients statewide, and ask for your support of HF813 and HF907. Respectfully, Maren Schroeder Policy Director, Sensible Change Minnesota Attachments: - Sensible Change Minnesota, Minnesota Medical Cannabis Pricing and Patient Experience Report, February 2020 - Sensible Change Minnesota, Medical Cannabis Program in Minnesota – Program Information - Americans for Safe Access, 2020 State of the States Report changemn.org Minnesota Medical Cannabis Pricing and Patient Experience Report Produced and published by Sensible Change Minnesota February 3, 2020 www.changemn.org Minnesota Medical Cannabis Pricing and Patient Experience Report Sensible Change Minnesota About Sensible Change Minnesota Sensible Change Minnesota grew out of our sister organization, Sensible Minnesota, to allow for more flexibility to advocate for sensible drug policy reforms unburdened by its 501(c)3 lobbying restrictions. Our team worked on many of the expansions of Minnesota’s medical cannabis program, including: • Intractable Pain, effective August 2016 • Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), effective August 2017 • Autism Spectrum Disorder, effective August 2018 • Alzheimer’s Disease, effective August 2019 • Reducing the qualifications for a patient to have a caregiver in the program, effective August 2019 (HF766, Section 6) • Chronic Pain • Oral dissolvable products 25,608 of Minnesota’s 28,522 registered patients (89.7%) qualify for the program because of a condition that Sensible Minnesota worked to add via the Commissioner of Health. Sensible Change Minnesota’s Board of Directors is comprised of grassroots activists, patients, caregivers, legal professionals, and union organizers. We amplify the voices of patients and consumers at the legislature. This section last updated: February 15, 2021 Questions on this report can be referred to Maren Schroeder, Policy Director, [email protected]. Page 2 of 18 Minnesota Medical Cannabis Pricing and Patient Experience Report Sensible Change Minnesota Key Findings ● 86 percent of surveyed registered medical cannabis patients reported price as the primary treatment barrier; 76 percent reported access to raw cannabis plant material. ● Inhalation oil cartridges are 52 percent more expensive than raw cannabis plant material on per mg of THC basis on average; capsules are 75 percent more expensive than raw cannabis plant material on a per mg of THC basis. ● 99 percent of patients surveyed by Sensible Change Minnesota support the addition of raw cannabis plant material as an allowable delivery method. Recommendations ● Permit raw cannabis plant material as an allowable delivery method. ● Remove limitations on allowable delivery methods, or at the very least, allow Minnesota manufacturers more flexibility in product development. ● Provide for more patient care centers (dispensaries) throughout the state. ● Create marketplace competition by increasing the number of medical cannabis licenses available. ● Provide funding for pricing audits by Minnesota state regulators. Page 3 of 18 Minnesota Medical Cannabis Pricing and Patient Experience Report Sensible Change Minnesota Introduction Medical cannabis was legalized in Minnesota in 2014, and the first patients purchased products on July 1, 2015. Minnesota’s program is the only established medical cannabis program in the country that does not permit any access to raw plant material. Minnesota has limited marketplace competition with only two vertically integrated manufacturers vs 715 on average (45 excluding Oklahoma with 4063) amongst other medicinal cannabis states. Initially Pennsylvania mirrored Minnesota’s permitted delivery methods but modified the program by adding licensees, allowing raw cannabis, and other adjustments to adjust patient concerns regarding access and affordability. This analysis sets forth pricing information for Minnesota, in comparison to Arizona, Florida, Illinois, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Pennsylvania based on information that is publicly available. Oklahoma did not implement their program until 2018, so revenue numbers for 2018 are unavailable. Oklahoma is included in this paper, with limitations, in order to compare patient numbers and product pricing with a new program. Analysis within will be revised as data is made available. Data provided within: ● Patient numbers; ● Cultivation and dispensary license numbers; ● Revenues; ● Per milligram of THC of cartridges, bulk oil, infused products, and cartridges; ● Per milligram of THC for raw cannabis products; and ● Sensible Change Minnesota patient survey results. Additionally, Sensible Change Minnesota conducted an online survey on barriers to access for patients. The findings of that survey are found within this paper. Finally, Sensible Change Minnesota’s recommendations to the legislature on accessibility are included in the conclusion. Methodology Data was collected using various sources (see endnotes), that were publicly available online. The author attempted to seek out consistent prices, but historical pricing of products was not found online. Patient numbers, revenues, and licenses are based on end of year numbers for 2018, except for Illinois, which provides data on a fiscal year basis, with their fiscal year ending on June 30, 2019. Page 4 of 18 Minnesota Medical Cannabis Pricing and Patient Experience Report Sensible Change Minnesota Sources include state regulators’ websites, statutes, rules, industry publications, and credible regional news sources. Additionally, pricing information was obtained from either dispensary websites or using the menu function on Leafly.com for the menus available via Leafly. Patient Numbers Minnesota had 18,127 enrolled patients, as of November 14, 2019, and has registered 30,187 patients to date; that is a loss of 40% of registered patients over four years. Data was collected on each state, the year it implemented medical cannabis, its most recent patient registry numbers, and its population. The percentage of the population that are medical cannabis patients in each state is then multiplied by Minnesota’s population to achieve the “MN Patient
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Green Regulatory Arbitrage
    Table of Contents I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... 1 II. PROHIBITION - HOW CANNABIS BECAME ILLEGAL ..................................................... 4 III. THE LEGAL LANDSCAPE .................................................................................................... 7 A. Federal Law And Its Impact On The Cannabis Industry ..................................................... 7 1. Cannabis Is A Schedule 1 Substance ............................................................................ 7 2. Access To Capital Markets Restricted ......................................................................... 9 3. Banking Services Limited .......................................................................................... 10 4. Tax Burdens .............................................................................................................. 11 5. Interstate And International Commerce Restrictions ................................................. 11 6. Insurance Options Limited ........................................................................................ 12 7. Medical Research And Clinical Trials Stymied .......................................................... 12 8. Professional Services Harder To Find ........................................................................ 13 9. Real Estate Challenges .............................................................................................. 13 B. The States
    [Show full text]
  • Q1 2019 Your Cannabis Investment Resource
    THE CANNIN REPORT | Q1/3 Q1 2019 Your Cannabis investment resource. THE CANNIN REPORT | Q1/3 table of contents 03 | welcome 04 | partner companies 05 | fundamental analysis 65 | cannin investing terms-to-know 67 | cannin cannabis terms-to-know 2 THE CANNIN REPORT | Q1/3 Cannin Report Q1 2019 – Cannabis Cultivators in the USA Welcome to Cannabis Investing in 2019! It’s crazy out there, we know. That’s why we put together our quarterly reports; to help you discern gold from fool’s gold. In the following pages you’ll find helpful terms-to-know for both cannabis and investing, deep analyses of 12 of the largest cannabis companies in the United States, and a piece on the important points on how to grow cannabis so you know what to look for when evaluating cannabis cultivators. Our team of industry experts has made this report easy to read, easy to understand, and easy to digest so that you’ll have the information you need to make the most profitable investments this calendar year. Thanks for purchasing, happy reading, and stay tuned to the next Cannin report (Q2) on the largest publicly traded hemp companies! Stephen Goldman & William Goodin Founders 3 THE CANNIN REPORT | Q1/3 4 THE CANNIN REPORT | Q1/3 55 THE CANNIN REPORT | Q1/3 A Short Explanation on How Cannin Evaluates Cannabis Companies Prior to investing in any stock, it’s important to do your homework. Fundamental analyses and technical analyses are essential to any stock evaluation and should be done with care. Cannin is here to help.
    [Show full text]
  • Bill Analysis and Fiscal Impact Statement
    The Florida Senate BILL ANALYSIS AND FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT (This document is based on the provisions contained in the legislation as of the latest date listed below.) Prepared By: The Professional Staff of the Committee on Agriculture BILL: SB 1766 INTRODUCER: Senator Powell SUBJECT: Sale of Hemp-derived Delta-8-tetrahydrocannabinol DATE: March 16, 2021 REVISED: ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR REFERENCE ACTION 1. Becker Becker AG Pre-meeting 2. CJ 3. RC I. Summary: SB 1788 creates s. 581.218, F.S., to regulate the sale of hemp-derived delta-8- tetrahydrocannabinol (delta-8-THC) products. It provides definitions for certain terms relating to the sale of delta-8-THC products. The bill specifies that a sale of hemp-derived dela-8-THC products constitutes a delivery sale regardless of whether the person accepting the order for the delivery is located in Florida. A retailer who mails or ships any hemp-derived delta-8-THC products must: Obtain a certification from the consumer who is purchasing the product that he or she is 21 years of age or older; Include as part of the order’s shipping documents, in a clear and conspicuous manner, the following statement: “Hemp-derived Delta-8-Tetrahydrocannabinol Products: Florida law prohibits shipping to individuals under 21 years of age and requires the payment of all applicable taxes”; and Be in compliance with any labeling requirements, pursuant to Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services rule for the state hemp program. The bill outlines specific violations that are misdemeanors of the first degree. The bill is effective July 1, 2021 BILL: SB 1766 Page 2 II.
    [Show full text]
  • As the Industry Develops, Cannabis and CBD Producers Sail Into the Dangerous Shoals of Product Recalls
    As the Industry Develops, Cannabis And CBD Producers Sail Into the Dangerous Shoals of Product Recalls By: Richard M. Blau, Chairman Cannabis Law Group Now that the federal government has legalized hemp and defined lawful cannabidiol (CBD) produced from hemp, the market for CBD products has moved forward with exponential growth. In 2018, approximately $620 million worth of CBD products were sold in the United States. Popular economic advice platforms such as The Motley Fool report projections from economists and industry experts estimating future growth at approximately $24 billion by 2023. Growing CBD revenue from $620 million in 2018 to $23.7 billion by 2023 delivers a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 107%. While such statistics reflect a maturing market, so, too , do the arrival of product recalls. Recently, several CBD companies announced voluntary recalls of their products. Summit Labs’ Kore Organic Watermelon CBD Oil On May 12, 2020, Florida-based Summitt Labs, which produces a wide range of hemp-derived cannabidiol (CBD) products, announced a voluntary nationwide recall of its Kore Organic watermelon tincture after the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs conducted a test on a random sample and found high levels of lead. When ingested, lead can cause various symptoms such as pain, nausea and kidney damage; in prolonged exposure situations, lead poisoning has been shown to contribute to degraded brain functions. Summit Labs conducted its own test through an accredited, independent lab that found the lead levels in an acceptable range under state law. But, because the Florida officials found excess lead levels in the sample they tested, Summitt quickly moved to withdraw the product from retailers, who have been notified by phone and email.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberty Health Sciences Inc. Management's Discussion
    LIBERTY HEALTH SCIENCES INC. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS This management discussion and analysis (“MD&A”) of the financial condition and results of operations of Liberty Health Sciences Inc., (the “Company” or “Liberty”), is for the three and six month period ended August 31, 2019, and 2018. It is supplemental to, and should be read in conjunction with the Company’s unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes for the three and six month period ended August 31, 2019, and 2018 (the “Q2 2020, and Q2 2019 Financials”) as well as the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended February 28, 2019. The Company’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). This MD&A has been prepared by reference to the MD&A disclosure requirements established under National Instrument 51-102 “Continuous Disclosure Obligations” (“NI 51-102”) of the Canadian Securities Administrators. Additional information regarding Liberty Health Sciences Inc. is available on our website at www.libertyhealthsciences.com or through the SEDAR website at www.sedar.com. In this MD&A, reference is made to gross profit before biological asset adjustments, gross margin before biological asset adjustments and adjusted earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”), which are not measures of financial performance under IFRS and may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies. The Company calculates each as follows: • Gross profit before biological asset adjustments is equal to gross profit less the non-cash change in the fair value on harvest and less the non-cash change in the fair value on cost of goods sold, if any.
    [Show full text]
  • CBD) Products Rich in CBD
    924 17th Ave SE Apt. 303 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55414 Sensible policies, safer communities. Representative Rob EcklunD, Chair Labor, InDustry, Veterans, anD Military Affairs Finance & Policy 409 State Office Building St. Paul, MN 55155 Re: House File 600 (Winkler) Cannabis Legalization Dear Chair Ecklund and Members of the Committee, I write toDay on behalf of Sensible Change Minnesota, in support of House File 600. We first want to thank Representative Winkler for his collaborative anD thoughtful approach in Developing this legislation. As an organization, we have done substantial work on improving Minnesota’s medical cannabis program. Our team has worked for the addition of intractable pain, post-traumatic stress disorder, autism, Alzheimer’s disease, and chronic pain as qualifying conditions, and oral dissolvable medical cannabis proDucts. We have also repeatedly engaged the legislature in an attempt to pass patient- centric legislation that will make medical cannabis more affordable and accessible for some of Minnesota’s sickest patients. We know: • the cost of meDical cannabis is extremely high in Minnesota, and insurance Does not cover the cost of this effective medicine for patients who are often disabled and limited in their ability to work; • Minnesota has a low percentage of its population in its meDical cannabis program compareD to states with more effective programs; • patients face limited options and access due to the limit of two medical cannabis manufacturers; anD • Minnesota’s two meDical cannabis companies have struggleD to turn a profit. We also know that cannabis prohibition was founDeD in racism anD irrational policy making, anD that the lasting effects of this faileD policy have disproportionately damageD communities of color.
    [Show full text]
  • Bill Analysis and Fiscal Impact Statement
    The Florida Senate BILL ANALYSIS AND FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT (This document is based on the provisions contained in the legislation as of the latest date listed below.) Prepared By: The Professional Staff of the Committee on Rules BILL: CS/CS/CS/SB 1876 INTRODUCER: Rules Committee; Innovation, Industry, and Technology Committee; Agriculture Committee; and Senator Montford SUBJECT: State Hemp Program DATE: March 3, 2020 REVISED: ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR REFERENCE ACTION 1. Becker Becker AG Fav/CS 2. Oxamendi Imhof IT Fav/CS 3. Becker Phelps RC Fav/CS Please see Section IX. for Additional Information: COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE - Substantial Changes I. Summary: CS/CS/CS/SB 1876 makes changes to the state hemp program. Specifically, the bill: Includes hemp extract in the definition of “food” in the Florida Food Safety Act; Requires persons who operate minor food outlets (which sell only commercially prepackaged food that is not potentially hazardous, or not time or temperature controlled for safety, if the shelf space for those items does not exceed 12 total linear feet) that sell hemp extract to obtain a food permit from the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (department); Excludes a substance or compound that is intended for ingestion which contains less than trace amounts of cannabidiol and includes a substance or compound that is intended for inhalation in the definition of “hemp extract;” Exempts synthetic cannabidiol (CBD) oil and seeds and seed-derived ingredients that are generally recognized as safe by the United States Food and Drug Administration from the definition of “hemp extract;” Provides that, if the plan submitted by the department to the Secretary of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Minnesota Medical Cannabis Pricing Report
    Minnesota Medical Cannabis Pricing and Patient Experience Report Produced and published by Sensible Change Minnesota www.changemn.org Minnesota Medical Cannabis Pricing and Patient Experience Report Sensible Change Minnesota About Sensible Change Minnesota Sensible Change Minnesota grew out of our sister organization, Sensible Minnesota, to allow for more flexibility to advocate for sensible drug policy reforms unburdened by its 501(c)3 lobbying restrictions. Our team is responsible for many of the expansions of Minnesota’s medical cannabis program, including: • Intractable Pain, effective August 2016 • Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), effective August 2017 • Autism Spectrum Disorder, effective August 2018 • Alzheimer’s Disease, effective August 2019 • Reducing the qualifications for a patient to have a caregiver in the program, effective August 2019 (HF766, Section 6) • Chronic Pain, effective August 2020 • Oral dissolvable products, effective August 2020 15,994 of Minnesota’s 18,249 registered patients (87.6%) qualify for the program because of a condition that Sensible Minnesota successfully petitioned MN’s Health Commissioner to add. Sensible Change Minnesota’s Board of Directors is comprised of grassroots activists, patients, caregivers, legal professionals, and union organizers. We amplify the voices of patients and consumers at the legislature. Questions on this report can be referred to Maren Schroeder, Policy Director, [email protected]. Page 2 of 18 Minnesota Medical Cannabis Pricing and Patient Experience Report Sensible Change Minnesota Key Findings ● 86 percent of surveyed registered medical cannabis patients reported price as the primary treatment barrier; 76 percent reported no access to raw cannabis plant material as a treatment barrier. ● Inhalation oil cartridges are, on average, 52 percent more expensive than raw cannabis plant material on a per mg of THC basis; capsules are 75 percent more expensive than raw cannabis plant material on a per mg of THC basis.
    [Show full text]
  • Trulieve: the Production of Medicinal Marijuana in Florida©
    Trulieve: the production of medicinal marijuana in Florida© G. Hackneya George Hackney, Inc., Hackney Nursery, 3690 Juniper Creek Road, Quincy, Florida 32351, USA. INTRODUCTION This paper reports on the process of starting the first legal medical marijuana production and dispenser facility in northwest Florida—Trulieve. Trulieve is now a Florida licensed medical Cannabis provider, http://trulieve.com/about. The product produced is low THC-Cannabis, which means a patient will not get “high” from the low dosage. The goal is for medical pain relief, as well as the control of seizures—some epileptic children suffer from as many as 100 seizures per day. The plants are produced at an unknown location in Quincy, Florida—for an extraction process to infuse into medical devices via oral syringe, capsule, tincture, or vaporizer. In Tallahassee, the dispensary sells products using Cannabis extract—from capsules to vaporizer use (Steven Jiwanmall, 29 Sept 2016. Insiders: A look at medical Cannabis in Florida, http://www.wtxl.com/insiders/insiders-a-look-at-medical- cannabis-in-florida/article_edddc022-89ad-11e6-a4ea-03bc56885560.html). COMPASSIONATE CARE ACT • Spring 2014: medical marijuana amendment is placed on the November ballot. • May 2014: legislation passes “Compassionate Care” Act. The Florida legislature is Republican controlled. FOR A NURSERY TO QUALIFY • 30 year license by Florida Department of Agriculture. • License has to be at 400,000 plant production level. • Product must be available by 1 Jan. 2015. LEGISLATIVE PROCESS • Fall 2014: (1) Rule making sessions begin/New Venture; (2) legal challenges to the rules; (3) lottery system is thrown out. • February 2015: Special rule making body appointed by Florida Department of Health.
    [Show full text]
  • BLUMA WELLNESS INC. CSE FORM 2A LISTING STATEMENT June 11
    BLUMA WELLNESS INC. CSE FORM 2A LISTING STATEMENT June 11, 2020 TOR_LAW\ 10222355\17 Bluma Wellness Inc. (“Bluma”) derives a substantial portion of its consolidated revenues from the medical cannabis industry in the State of Florida, where local state laws permit such industry but is illegal under United States federal law. Bluma is directly engaged in the manufacture, possession, use, sale and distribution of medical cannabis in the State of Florida. Third party service providers could suspend or withdraw services and regulatory bodies couple impose certain restrictions on Bluma as a result of Bluma’s operating in an industry that is illegal under U.S. federal law. The United States federal government regulates drugs through the Controlled Substances Act (the “CSA”) (21 U.S.C. § 811), which places controlled substances, including cannabis, in a schedule. Cannabis is classified as a Schedule I controlled substance. Under United States federal law, a Schedule I drug or substance has a high potential for abuse, no accepted medical use in the United States, and a lack of accepted safety for the use of the drug under medical supervision. The CSA explicitly prohibits the manufacturing, distribution, selling and possession of cannabis and cannabis derived products as a consequence of its Schedule I classification. The United States Food and Drug Administration has not approved marijuana as a safe and effective drug for any indication. In the United States, cannabis is largely regulated at the state level. State laws that permit and regulate the production, distribution and use of cannabis for medical or recreational purposes are in direct conflict with the federal CSA, which makes cannabis use and possession federally illegal.
    [Show full text]
  • Trulieve: the Production of Medicinal Marijuana in Florida©
    1 Trulieve: The Production of Medicinal Marijuana in Florida© George Hackney George Hackney, Inc. - Hackney Nursery, 3690 Juniper Creek Road, Quincy, Florida 32351 [email protected] INTRODUCITION This paper reports on the process of starting the first legal medical marijuana production and dispenser facility in Northwest Florida - Trulieve. Trulieve is now a Florida licensed medical cannabis provider http://trulieve.com/about . The product produced is low THC-cannabis, which means a patient will not get “high” from the low dosage. The goal is for medical pain relief, as well as the control of seizures – some epileptic children suffer from as many as 100 seizures per day. The plants are produced at an unknown location in Quincy, Florida - for an extraction process to infuse into medical devices via oral syringe, capsule, tincture or vaporizer. In Tallahassee, the dispensary sells products using Cannabis extract – from capsules to vaporizer use (Steven Jiwanmall, 29 Sept 2016. Insiders: A look at medical Cannabis in Florida, http://www.wtxl.com/insiders/insiders-a-look-at-medical-cannabis-in-florida/article_edddc022- 89ad-11e6-a4ea-03bc56885560.html ) COMPASSIONATE CARE ACT Spring 2014 - Medical marijuana amendment is placed on the November Ballot. 2 May 2014 - Legislation Passes “Compassionate Care” Act. The Florida legislature is Republican controlled. FOR A NURSERY TO QUALIFY 30 year license by Florida Department of Agriculture. License has to be at 400,000 plant production level. Product must be available by 1 January 2015. LEGISLATIVE PROCESS Fall 2014 – 1) Rule making sessions begin / New Venture; 2) legal challenges to the rules; 3) lottery system is thrown out.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Sanibel Ordinance 17-002 an Ordinance of The
    CITY OF SANIBEL ORDINANCE 17-002 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANIBEL, ESTABLISHING A TEMPORARY MORATORIUM ON CANNABIS DISPENSING BUSINESSES AS FURTHER DEFINED HEREIN; PROVIDING FOR GEOGRAPHIC AREA COVERED; PROVIDING FOR PENALTIES; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION; AND PROVIDING FORAN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, in 2014 the Florida Legislature enacted a law legalizing low-THC medical cannabis in Florida; and WHEREAS, in 2016 the Florida Legislature expanded the law to legalize medical cannabis in Florida; and WHEREAS, in November, 2016 the Florida electorate passed a Constitutional Amendment which legalized the use of medical marijuana under state law in accordance with the provisions set forth in such Constitutional Amendment; and WHEREAS, a comprehensive state licensing and regulatory framework for the cultivation, processing, and dispensing of cannabis now exists under state statutory law, however the licensing and re1,>ulatory scheme to implement the 2016 Constitutional Amendment are currently being developed by tbe state; and WHEREAS, the current state licensing and regulatory framework directs that tbe criteria for the number and location of, and otber permitting requirements that do not conflict with state law or department rule for, dispensing facilities of cannabis businesses may be determined by local ordinance; and WHEREAS, cannabis businesses licensed pursuant to the current state law have begun cultivating cannabis for processing and dispensing; and 1 Ord 17-002 WHEREAS, the dispensing
    [Show full text]