DOCSLIB.ORG

MT. TABOR PARK MASTER PLAN REPORT Portland Parks and Recreation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MT. TABOR PARK MASTER PLAN REPORT Portland Parks and Recreation MT. TABOR PARK MASTER PLAN REPORT Portland Parks and Recreation January 2000 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The following people and organizations contributed to the development of the Mt. Tabor Park Master Plan: Portland Parks and Recreation Gregg Everhart George Lozovoy Zari Santner Cogan Owens Cogan Elaine Cogan Kirsten Greene Citizens Advisory Committee: Ray DeClark, Mt. Tabor Realty Lynn Bailey, Mt. Tabor Neighborhood Association Brian Bainnson, Center Neighborhood Association Ron Bates, Warner Pacific College Olivia Kulas, Sunnyside Neighborhood Association Sherman Coventry, Bicycle Coalition Chair Laura Gordon, Mt. Tabor Neighborhood Association Dana Harden, Mt. Tabor Presbyterian Church Paul Leistner, Mt. Tabor Neighborhood Association Gerard Lillie, Audubon Society Nancy Norby, PUP (People Using Parks) Diane Redd, Mt. Tabor Concerts Mt. Tabor Middle School* Lynn Ruark, Western Seminary Blanche Schroeder, Senior and Citizen at Large David Tucker, Montavilla Neighborhood Association Kelly Wellington, Tree Liaison & Richmond Neigh Pat Wisener, Mt. Tabor Neighborhood Association Parks Chair Paul Zenk, PDX Soap Box Derby Doug Zenn, Citizen at Large Design Team: Walker Macy - Landscape Architects Michael Zilis Kurt Lango Eric Shriner John Kyle Architects - Architects John Kyle Don Trotter KPFF Consulting Engineers - Civil, Structural, Geotechnical Engineers Bob Grummel Susan VanDyke Kittelson & Associates, Inc. - Transportation Engineers Beth Wemple Maurita Smyth - Environmental Assessment Robert Mazany & Associates - Arborist Raven Communications - Interpretation/Environmental Education Carolyn Shelton Center for Population Research & Census - Demographic Information George Hough * Tony Richardson resigned due to health reasons. Replacement not appointed at end. Front cover photo by Brad Yazzolino TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction . 1 Executive Summary. 2 Process. 7 Existing Conditions Analysis . 9 Park Function Site Inventory Roadway Assessment Park User Survey Water Bureau Park Structures Access and Circulation Forest Health Wildlife Habitat Assessment Interpretive Opportunities Sieve Analysis Key Considerations and Program . 17 Access Environment Facilities Programs Vision and Goals . 21 Vision Statement Master Plan Goals Master Plan Alternatives. 25 Alternative One Alternative Two Alternative Three Preliminary Master Plan. 29 Final Master Plan. 31 Circulation Interpretive Opportunities Structures Amphitheater, Overlooks and Entry Gates Off-Leash Area Play Areas Parking Erosion and Drainage Costs, Priorities and Phasing . 39 Estimated Cost Phase One Priorities Appendix I . 43 A. Transportation Report B. Preliminary Vegetation Condition Review C. Wildlife & Habitat Baseline Report D. Interpretation and Environmental Education Report E. Facilities Report INTRODUCTION There seems to be every reason why a portion, at least, of Mount Tabor should be taken as a public park. It is the only important landscape feature for miles around, and the population in its vicinity is destined to be fairly dense. It is already a good deal resorted to by people for their Sunday and holiday outings, and it will be better known to and more visited by the citizens as time goes on. .There can be little doubt that public sentiment will cordially support the city government in acquiring considerable land on this prominent and beautiful hill (Olmsted Brothers "Report of the Park Board," 1903). At the recommendation of John Charles Olmsted and Frederick Law Olmsted, Jr., the City of Portland purchased the first of an eventual 196 acres of land on Mt. Tabor in 1929, creating one of the most popular and beautiful parks in the Portland metropolitan area. Mt. Tabor rises 300 feet to an elevation of 645 feet at its summit, affording dramatic views of its surrounding southeast neighborhood, downtown Portland and the Willamette Valley to the west, and Mt. Hood to the east. Pedestrian Path Mt. Tabor shares its origins with two other prominent East Portland buttes- Rocky Butte and Kelly Butte. The topography of Mt. Tabor consists of three peaks, a broad shallow valley on the western slope, a steep eastern slope, a small ravine in the northwest corner, and a volcanic cinder cone that forms the northern slope of that ravine. Because sedimentary gravels and sands from historic floods compose the majority of Mt. Tabor's mass, its volcanic origins were not uncovered until 1912, when the Portland Water Bureau began excavation for the open reservoirs that now grace its southern and western slopes1. The volcanic stones from these excavations can be found in the many walls constructed throughout the Park, and this discovery allows Portlanders to boast having the only volcano within the city limits of any other U.S. city besides Bend, Oregon. Located three miles east of the Willamette River in east Portland, Mt. Tabor is bordered by S.E. Yamhill Ave to the north, S.E. Mountain View Dr. to the east, S.E. Division Street to the south, and S.E. 60th Avenue to the west. Mt. Tabor acts as the dominant landmark for the Mt. Tabor, Center and South Tabor neighborhoods and for the Hawthorne district. One of the largest of the east Portland parks, Mt. Tabor Park is classified as a metropolitan park and attracts the City’s residents and regional visitors Volcanic Cinder Cone with its abundance of geological, ecological, historical and recreational resources. True to the sentiment expressed by the Olmsted brothers over 90 years ago, Portland's citizens continue to cherish Mt. Tabor Park, and have joined with Portland Parks and Recreation (PPR) through this master planning effort in ensuring its future over the next 20 years. 1Relining Reservoir Saves Precious Water. The Southeast Examiner, November 1998. Vol. 9, No. 10. 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Renovate: - amphitheater - picnic shelter - parking lot - restroom - play area New interpretive area Renovate restroom Upgrade play equipment Renovate entry Tennis New tot lot volleyball Tennis Forest restoration Renovate parking Renovate restroom New picnic tables New overlook Remove derby track Relocate compost area Renovate entry Trail improvements Portable restroom structure Erosion control Upgrade play equipment Plant restoration New picnic tables Figure 1 - Mt. Tabor Master Plan 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Mt. Tabor is an irreplaceable resource for the people of Portland. It acts as an oasis, a place of solitude, a place to be in a natural environment within an urban context. Its importance was first noted at the turn of the 20th century and that importance will grow even stronger during the 21st century as Portland becomes more densely populated. Mt. Tabor Park accommodates many levels of use and is seen differently by the variety of people who use it. It functions as a metropolitan park, accommodating citizens and visitors from the entire city. In doing so, it needs to be easily located and understood by those coming from other areas of Portland. It functions as a primary water reservoir for the city, thereby requiring special access, facilities, and management. It also functions as a neighborhood park for those who live adjacent to it. These are the people who know Mt. Tabor intimately and use it regularly. Their needs for access, use, and security are important to the daily functioning of the park. The Mt. Tabor Park Master Plan was developed through a meaningful and on-going public process that directed the formulation of the vision, goals, management strategies, and a physical plan. This plan directly embodies the community's vision for the next 20 years of the life of Mt. Tabor. The primary focus of the plan is to preserve and enhance the natural qualities of Mt. Tabor. The circulation systems, the recreational uses, and the facilities envisioned have been planned in balance with the environmental qualities of the park. It is intended that this document set the framework to guide decisions that provide balance between human and environmental needs and continually move the park towards the stated vision. Through on-going discussion between the City and its citizens, this plan can achieve its goal of ensuring that Mt. Tabor continues to be an irreplaceable resource for generations to come. 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recreational Program The program for recreation at Mt. Tabor is intended to take advantage of the park’s unique natural features. It provides a mix of active and passive recreational opportunities in balance with the park's metropolitan classification, environmental requirements, its physical attributes, and its neighborhood setting. Program Elements Area Interpretation and Education • Trails • Sign systems • Interpretive area at Cinder Cone Enjoyment of Natural Environment • Trails • Overviews • Forest restoration Picnics • Group areas: Harrison St./69th St./Central Shelter • Individual picnic tables • Open lawn areas throughout Walking/Strolling/Jogging • Hierarchy of paths throughout Bicycle/Skateboard/Roller Blade • Hierarchy of paths and roads Viewing the City/Sunsets/Mt. Hood • View points at key areas Small Events and Celebrations • Amphitheater • Picnic shelters • Open lawn areas Summer Children's Program • Amphitheater area • Throughout the park Play Areas • Salmon Street tot lot • Main Play Area • Harrison St. • 69th Street Tennis • Near Reservoir #6 • Near 69th St. Entry Volleyball • Open lawn areas • Mountain View Avenue Frisbee, Croquet, etc. • Open lawn areas Recreational program elements not accommodated in the plan include: • Basketball • Soccer • Off-leash dog areas 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Facilities The plan
Load more

Recommended publications
  • District Background
    DRAFT SOUTHEAST LIAISON DISTRICT PROFILE DRAFT Introduction In 2004 the Bureau of Planning launched the District Liaison Program which assigns a City Planner to each of Portland’s designated liaison districts. Each planner acts as the Bureau’s primary contact between community residents, nonprofit groups and other government agencies on planning and development matters within their assigned district. As part of this program, District Profiles were compiled to provide a survey of the existing conditions, issues and neighborhood/community plans within each of the liaison districts. The Profiles will form a base of information for communities to make informed decisions about future development. This report is also intended to serve as a tool for planners and decision-makers to monitor the implementation of existing plans and facilitate future planning. The Profiles will also contribute to the ongoing dialogue and exchange of information between the Bureau of Planning, the community, and other City Bureaus regarding district planning issues and priorities. PLEASE NOTE: The content of this document remains a work-in-progress of the Bureau of Planning’s District Liaison Program. Feedback is appreciated. Area Description Boundaries The Southeast District lies just east of downtown covering roughly 17,600 acres. The District is bordered by the Willamette River to the west, the Banfield Freeway (I-84) to the north, SE 82nd and I- 205 to the east, and Clackamas County to the south. Bureau of Planning - 08/03/05 Southeast District Page 1 Profile Demographic Data Population Southeast Portland experienced modest population growth (3.1%) compared to the City as a whole (8.7%).
    [Show full text]
  • What to See in Portland Update2009
    What to see in Portland, OR - by Marco Behrmann 07/02/2004 1/3 WHAT TO SEE IN PORTLAND , OR _________________________________________ Listed below you will find a couple of sights and my personal favourites to do in Portland. Since Portland was my town of exchange I do not know as many things about the other cities like Eugene, Corvallis, Ashland or La Grande. However, it would be just great if somebody could add tips about their places similar to the ones here, too! Please feel free to forward them to me (marcobehrmann[at]web.de ). I do not want you to believe that just because I stayed in Portland, and have many tips here for Portland, that a year at one of the other Oregon cities is not the same exciting. The tips listed here, however, are interesting for all Baden-Wuerttemberg students in Oregon, because many things you can already see and experience during your orientation weeks. (BTW: This is almost everything I did (among other things, of course) within my 2 ½ weeks of re-visiting in June 2004; but it took me a year of living in the city in 2001/02 to figure out which were the hot tips ☺) Here are my personal Must-Sees Oregon History Center in SW Park blocks right south of PSU (This museum features very interesting and well researched exhibitions about the development of Portland as a city as well as about the whole Pacific Northwest as it was discovered from the sea and the Columbia River; good place to check out during your orientation weeks; you get a student reduction with ISIC or other student ID card) Council Crest Park (considered the highest spot in Portland; nice views to Mt Hood, Mt Adams, Mt St Helens and even Mt Rainier on some days as well as to Beaverton; take Bus 51 [Vista]; the Bus driver often feels himself as an informal Portland guide; tell him that you are visiting and he even might stop for you at nice viewpoints to take pictures.
    [Show full text]
  • Tel Aviv, Exploring the “Start Up” Economy Israel Is Famous For, and Learning About the Birth of the Jewish State
    What is behind the scenes of a small country constantly in the headlines? Tour Dates: Israel is a place of contradictions: an ancient land with the newest technology; a tiny Oct. 19 ‐ Nov. 2, 2020 state with immigrants from dozens of countries; a haven for the Jewish people and a Jordan and Petra Extension: home for Muslims, Christians and Druse; a country small in area with an astounding array of flora and fauna. Join us on this 14‐day trip to explore, encounter and understand Nov. 2 ‐ 6, 2020 Israel. We start in Jerusalem, the place the ancients described as the center of the world. We Tour Cost: will have in‐depth tours of the Old City and its holy sites, and visit the modern Israeli institutions of government and culture. $5,300.00 Continuing to the magnificent Judean desert, we will enter the home of Herod’s Single supplement: mountain fortress, Masada. Trips to Gush Etzion, Hebron, Bethlehem and Samaria will $1100.00 reveal the Biblical heartland as well as places that are sources of conflict in modern times. Continue on to the north of the country to explore the birthplaces of Christianity and of Jordan and Petra Extension: Jewish mysticism. Archaeological sites are everywhere! We will also immerse ourselves $1790.00 in the beautiful landscapes, and learn that the land of Israel sits at the crossroads of three continents, and in the middle of multiple cultures. Single supplement: $380.00 We end our trip in the metropolis of Tel Aviv, exploring the “start up” economy Israel is famous for, and learning about the birth of the Jewish state.
    [Show full text]
  • Aliyah and Settlement Process?
    Jewish Women in Pre-State Israel HBI SERIES ON JEWISH WOMEN Shulamit Reinharz, General Editor Joyce Antler, Associate Editor Sylvia Barack Fishman, Associate Editor The HBI Series on Jewish Women, created by the Hadassah-Brandeis Institute, pub- lishes a wide range of books by and about Jewish women in diverse contexts and time periods. Of interest to scholars and the educated public, the HBI Series on Jewish Women fills major gaps in Jewish Studies and in Women and Gender Studies as well as their intersection. For the complete list of books that are available in this series, please see www.upne.com and www.upne.com/series/BSJW.html. Ruth Kark, Margalit Shilo, and Galit Hasan-Rokem, editors, Jewish Women in Pre-State Israel: Life History, Politics, and Culture Tova Hartman, Feminism Encounters Traditional Judaism: Resistance and Accommodation Anne Lapidus Lerner, Eternally Eve: Images of Eve in the Hebrew Bible, Midrash, and Modern Jewish Poetry Margalit Shilo, Princess or Prisoner? Jewish Women in Jerusalem, 1840–1914 Marcia Falk, translator, The Song of Songs: Love Lyrics from the Bible Sylvia Barack Fishman, Double or Nothing? Jewish Families and Mixed Marriage Avraham Grossman, Pious and Rebellious: Jewish Women in Medieval Europe Iris Parush, Reading Jewish Women: Marginality and Modernization in Nineteenth-Century Eastern European Jewish Society Shulamit Reinharz and Mark A. Raider, editors, American Jewish Women and the Zionist Enterprise Tamar Ross, Expanding the Palace of Torah: Orthodoxy and Feminism Farideh Goldin, Wedding Song: Memoirs of an Iranian Jewish Woman Elizabeth Wyner Mark, editor, The Covenant of Circumcision: New Perspectives on an Ancient Jewish Rite Rochelle L.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Conquests of Canaan
    ÅA Wars in the Middle East are almost an every day part of Eero Junkkaala:of Three Canaan Conquests our lives, and undeniably the history of war in this area is very long indeed. This study examines three such wars, all of which were directed against the Land of Canaan. Two campaigns were conducted by Egyptian Pharaohs and one by the Israelites. The question considered being Eero Junkkaala whether or not these wars really took place. This study gives one methodological viewpoint to answer this ques- tion. The author studies the archaeology of all the geo- Three Conquests of Canaan graphical sites mentioned in the lists of Thutmosis III and A Comparative Study of Two Egyptian Military Campaigns and Shishak and compares them with the cities mentioned in Joshua 10-12 in the Light of Recent Archaeological Evidence the Conquest stories in the Book of Joshua. Altogether 116 sites were studied, and the com- parison between the texts and the archaeological results offered a possibility of establishing whether the cities mentioned, in the sources in question, were inhabited, and, furthermore, might have been destroyed during the time of the Pharaohs and the biblical settlement pe- riod. Despite the nature of the two written sources being so very different it was possible to make a comparative study. This study gives a fresh view on the fierce discus- sion concerning the emergence of the Israelites. It also challenges both Egyptological and biblical studies to use the written texts and the archaeological material togeth- er so that they are not so separated from each other, as is often the case.
    [Show full text]
  • A Report on the 2003 Parks Levy Investment Objective 1: Restore
    A Report on the 2003 Parks Levy Investment In November 2002, Portland voters approved a five-year Parks Levy to begin in July 2003. Levy dollars restored budget cuts made in FY 2002-03 as well as major services and improvements outlined in the Parks 2020 Vision plan adopted by City Council in July 2001. In order to fulfill our obligation to the voters, we identified four key objectives. This report highlights what we have accomplished to date. Objective 1: Restore $2.2 million in cuts made in 2002/03 budget The 2003 Parks Levy restored cuts that were made to balance the FY 2002-03 General Fund budget. These cuts included the closure of some recreational facilities, the discontinuation and reduction of some community partnerships that provide recreational opportunities for youth, and reductions in maintenance of parks and facilities. Below is a detailed list of services restored through levy dollars. A. Restore programming at six community schools. SUN Community Schools support healthy social and cross-cultural development of all participants, teach and model values of respect and inclusion of all people, and help reduce social disparities and inequities. Currently, over 50% of students enrolled in the program are children of color. 2003/04 projects/services 2004/05 projects/services Proposed projects/services 2005/06 Hired and trained full-time Site Coordinators Total attendance at new sites (Summer Continue to develop programming to serve for 6 new PP&R SUN Community Schools: 2004-Spring 2005): 85,159 the needs of each school’s community and Arleta, Beaumont, Centennial, Clarendon, increase participation in these programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Budget Reductions & Urban Forestry Learning Landscapes Plantings
    View this email in your browser Share this URBAN FORESTRY January 2016 Get Involved! | Resources | Tree Permits | Tree Problems | Home In This Issue Budget Reductions & Urban Forestry Learning Landscapes Plantings, Urban Forestry in the Schoolyard Hiring Youth Conservation Crew (YCC) Summer Crew Leader, Apply by Thursday, March 3, 2016 Upcoming Urban Forestry Workshops, Free and Open to the Public Budget Reductions & Urban Forestry You may have recently heard about the upcoming 5% budget cuts proposed for Parks programs. Among the difficult reductions proposed, Urban Forestry could be effected by elimination of the $185,000 Dutch Elm Disease (DED) Treatment program. The City of Portland has minimized the spread of DED and avoided the decimation of the American elm (Ulmus americana) with a successful elm monitoring and treatment program. Without advanced warning, rapid detection and removal, the American elm could ultimately vanish from our landscape. Eastmoreland, Ladd’s Addition, the South Park blocks, Lents Park, Laurelhurst Park, and Overlook Park are areas where elms play a significant role in neighborhood identity. "Many communities have been able to maintain a healthy population of mature elms through a vigilant program of identification and removal of diseased elms and systematic pruning of weakened, dying or dead branches" -Linda Haugen, Plant Pathologist, USDA Forest Service Eliminating this program will also require adjacent property owners to cover the cost of removing DED- infected street trees themselves. The cut will also reduce citywide 24/7 emergency response to clear roads of trees which have fallen during storms, and reduce regular maintenance of publicly-owned trees- additional activities performed by some of the same staff .
    [Show full text]
  • Trail Running in the Portland Area
    TRAIL RUNNING IN THE PORTLAND AREA Banks-Vernonia State Trail Activity: Trail Running Buxton, OR Trail Distance: 4 miles A wide gravel multi-use trail that travels through a second-growth Douglas fir forest. You’ll enjoy the smooth graded surface on this 20-mile multi-use trail that travels through a serene forest canopy. Clackamas River Activity: Trail Running Estacada, OR Trail Distance: 8 miles A classic river trail that traces the contours of the Clackamas River through pockets of old- growth western red cedar and Douglas fir. River views. Creek crossings. Bridge crossings. Glendover Fitness Trail Loop Activity: Trail Running Portland, OR Trail Distance: 2 miles Wood-chip trail (with a short paved section) that circles Glendoveer Golf Course in northeast Portland. This sophisticated wood- chip trail circles the smooth greens of Glendoveer Golf Course in northe... Hagg Lake Loop Activity: Trail Running Forest Grove, OR Trail Distance: 15.1 miles Combination of singletrack trail, paved paths, and roads that take you around scenic Hagg Lake in Scoggins Valley Regional Park in Washington County. Bridge crossings. This sinewy trail offers plenty ... Leif Erikson Drive Activity: Trail Running Portland, OR Trail Distance: 12 miles Nonmotorized multi-use gravel-dirt road with distance markers that winds through 5,000- acre Forest Park in Portland. Occasional views. This civilized multi-use trail is an easy cruise on a multi-use g... Leif Erikson Drive - Wildwood Loop Activity: Trail Running Portland, OR Trail Distance: 7.9 miles The route travels on singletrack trails and a doubletrack gravel road through the scenic treed setting of Forest Park.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 DRAFT Park SDC Capital Plan 150412.Xlsx
    2015 PARK SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE 20‐YEAR CAPITAL PLAN (SUMMARY) April 2015 As required by ORS 223.309 Portland Parks and Recreation maintains a list of capacity increasing projects intended to TYPES OF PROJECTS THAT INCREASE CAPACITY: address the need created by growth. These projects are eligible to be funding with Park SDC revenue . The total value of Land acquisition projects summarized below exceeds the potential revenue of $552 million estimated by the 2015 Park SDC Methodology and Develop new parks on new land the funding from non-SDC revenue targeted for growth projects. Expand existing recreation facilities, trails, play areas, picnic areas, etc The project list and capital plan is a "living" document that, per ORS 223.309 (2), maybe modified at anytime. It should be Increase playability, durability and life of facilities noted that potential modifications to the project list will not impact the fee since the fee is not based on the project list, but Develop and improve parks to withstand more intense and extended use rather the level of service established by the adopted Park SDC Methodology. Construct new or expand existing community centers, aquatic facilities, and maintenance facilities Increase capacity of existing community centers, aquatic facilities, and maintenance facilities ELIGIBLE PROJECTS POTENTIAL REVENUE TOTAL PARK SDC ELIGIBLE CAPACITY INCREASING PROJECTS 20‐year Total SDC REVENUE CATEGORY SDC Funds Other Revenue Total 2015‐35 TOTAL Park SDC Eligible City‐Wide Capacity Increasing Projects 566,640,621 City‐Wide
    [Show full text]
  • Origin of the Sinai-Negev Erg, Egypt and Israel: Mineralogical and Geochemical Evidence for the Importance of the Nile and Sea Level History Daniel R
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln USGS Staff -- ubP lished Research US Geological Survey 2013 Origin of the Sinai-Negev erg, Egypt and Israel: mineralogical and geochemical evidence for the importance of the Nile and sea level history Daniel R. Muhs U.S. Geological Survey, [email protected] Joel Roskin Ben-Gurion University of the Negev Haim Tsoar Ben-Gurion University of the Negev Gary Skipp U.S. Geological Survey, [email protected] James Budahn U.S. Geological Survey See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsstaffpub Part of the Geology Commons, Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology Commons, Other Earth Sciences Commons, and the Other Environmental Sciences Commons Muhs, Daniel R.; Roskin, Joel; Tsoar, Haim; Skipp, Gary; Budahn, James; Sneh, Amihai; Porat, Naomi; Stanley, Jean-Daniel; Katra, Itzhak; and Blumberg, Dan G., "Origin of the Sinai-Negev erg, Egypt and Israel: mineralogical and geochemical evidence for the importance of the Nile and sea level history" (2013). USGS Staff -- Published Research. 931. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsstaffpub/931 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the US Geological Survey at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in USGS Staff -- ubP lished Research by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Authors Daniel R. Muhs, Joel Roskin, Haim Tsoar, Gary Skipp, James Budahn, Amihai Sneh, Naomi Porat, Jean-Daniel Stanley, Itzhak Katra, and Dan G. Blumberg This article is available at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsstaffpub/931 Quaternary Science Reviews 69 (2013) 28e48 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Quaternary Science Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/quascirev Origin of the SinaieNegev erg, Egypt and Israel: mineralogical and geochemical evidence for the importance of the Nile and sea level history Daniel R.
    [Show full text]
  • The Boring Volcanic Field of the Portland-Vancouver Area, Oregon and Washington: Tectonically Anomalous Forearc Volcanism in an Urban Setting
    Downloaded from fieldguides.gsapubs.org on April 29, 2010 The Geological Society of America Field Guide 15 2009 The Boring Volcanic Field of the Portland-Vancouver area, Oregon and Washington: Tectonically anomalous forearc volcanism in an urban setting Russell C. Evarts U.S. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefi eld Road, Menlo Park, California 94025, USA Richard M. Conrey GeoAnalytical Laboratory, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164, USA Robert J. Fleck Jonathan T. Hagstrum U.S. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefi eld Road, Menlo Park, California 94025, USA ABSTRACT More than 80 small volcanoes are scattered throughout the Portland-Vancouver metropolitan area of northwestern Oregon and southwestern Washington. These vol- canoes constitute the Boring Volcanic Field, which is centered in the Neogene Port- land Basin and merges to the east with coeval volcanic centers of the High Cascade volcanic arc. Although the character of volcanic activity is typical of many mono- genetic volcanic fi elds, its tectonic setting is not, being located in the forearc of the Cascadia subduction system well trenchward of the volcanic-arc axis. The history and petrology of this anomalous volcanic fi eld have been elucidated by a comprehensive program of geologic mapping, geochemistry, 40Ar/39Ar geochronology, and paleomag- netic studies. Volcanism began at 2.6 Ma with eruption of low-K tholeiite and related lavas in the southern part of the Portland Basin. At 1.6 Ma, following a hiatus of ~0.8 m.y., similar lavas erupted a few kilometers to the north, after which volcanism became widely dispersed, compositionally variable, and more or less continuous, with an average recurrence interval of 15,000 yr.
    [Show full text]
  • Books on the Historical Jesus
    Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus 8 (2010) 183–194 brill.nl/jshj Books on the Historical Jesus CHARLESWORTH, James H. (ed.), Jesus and Archaeology (Grand Rapids, MI/ Cambridge: Eerdmans, 2006), xxv + 740 pp. ISBN 9780802848802. $50.00. Pbk. In this volume James H. Charlesworth proff ers contributions to a Jerusalem sympo sium that brought archaeologists and biblical scholars together around the reference point of the historical Jesus. In a Preface (‘Th e Historical Jesus and Biblical Archaeology: Questions’) Charlesworth challenges the stereotype of New Testament specialists as faith-driven theologians and archaeologists as disinterested scientists. And in an Introduction (‘What is Biblical Archaeology’) Avraham Biran extols the sub-discipline of biblical archaeology and, drawing upon excavations at Tel Dan, articulates how, in his judgment, ‘archaeological research and biblical studies…are intertwined’ (p. 2). Charlesworth categorizes the contributions under two main headings: ‘Studies in Archaeology’ and ‘Archaeology and Th eology’. For the fi rst, ‘Studies in Archaeology’, the contributors and papers are Charlesworth, ‘Jesus Research and Archaeology: A New Perspective’; Sean Freyne, ‘Archaeology and the Historical Jesus’; Bruce Chilton, ‘Recovering Jesus’ Mamzerut ’; Richard A. Batey, ‘Did Antipas Build the Sepphoris Th eater?’; Peter Richardson, ‘Khirbet Qana (and Other Villages) as a Context for Jesus’; Rami Arav, ‘Bethsaida’; Frédéric Manns, ‘Mount Tabor’; Esther Eshel, ‘Jesus the Exorcist in Light of Epigraphic Sources’; Henry W. M. Rietz, ‘Refl ections on Jesus’ Eschatology in Light of Qumran’; James D. G. Dunn, ‘Did Jesus Attend the Synagogue?’; Benedict Th omas Viviano, op, ‘Synagogues and Spirituality: Th e Case of Beth Alfa’; John S.
    [Show full text]