DOCSLIB.ORG

Geologic Map of the Cochetopa Park and North Pass Calderas, Northeastern San Juan Mountains, Colorado

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Geologic Map of the Cochetopa Park and North Pass Calderas, Northeastern San Juan Mountains, Colorado Geologic Map of the Cochetopa Park and North Pass Calderas, Northeastern San Juan Mountains, Colorado By Peter W. Lipman Pamphlet to accompany Scientific Investigations Map 3123 Cochetopa Dome, 11,132 ft Razor Creek Dome (intracaldera rhyolite flows) 11,520 ft (northwest caldera rim) Green Mountain,10,930 ft (northeast caldera rim) NE-trending tongue, Cochetopa Canyon Nelson Mountain Tuff Caldera-filling tuffs and volcaniclastic sedimentary rocks Panoramic view of Cochetopa Dome (sequence of rhyolitic lava flows within caldera) and north walls of Cochetopa Park caldera, viewed from south. Cloud-obscured northwest caldera rim, at left of image, is Sawtooth Mountain (12,147 ft); northeast caldera rim is marked by Razor Creek Dome and Green Mountain on right side. Light-colored eroding outcrops in foreground are weakly indurated tuff and volcaniclastic sedimentary fill of the caldera basin. 2012 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey This page intentionally left blank CONTENTS Introduction.....................................................................................................................................................1 Ignimbrite caldera cycles and eruptive processes .................................................................................1 Methods of study ...........................................................................................................................................2 Regional framework ......................................................................................................................................3 Early northern volcanism along the Sawatch trend .......................................................................4 San Juan volcanic region ....................................................................................................................4 Early lavas and intrusions: Saguache-Cochetopa region (35–32 Ma) .................................................5 Saguache Creek Tuff and North Pass caldera cycle (32.2 Ma) .............................................................6 Precursor(?) lavas (32.2 Ma) and tuff of Spanish Creek (32.5 Ma) ...............................................7 Saguache Creek Tuff (32.25 Ma) .........................................................................................................7 Formation of the North Pass caldera ................................................................................................8 Caldera-filling lavas (volcanics of Cochetopa Hills, 32.2 Ma) .......................................................9 Luders Creek Tuff (32.17 Ma) ...............................................................................................................9 Late andesite flows and associated rocks (30.0–30.5 Ma) ..........................................................10 Northern rhyolite-dacite dome field (29.8 Ma) ........................................................................................10 Younger eruptions from other San Juan calderas (28.3–26.9 Ma).......................................................11 Sapinero Mesa Tuff ............................................................................................................................11 Fish Canyon Tuff ..................................................................................................................................11 Carpenter Ridge and Wason Park Tuffs ..........................................................................................11 Younger intermediate-composition lava flows .......................................................................................12 Rocks of the San Luis caldera complex ...................................................................................................12 Rat Creek Tuff ......................................................................................................................................12 Cebolla Creek Tuff ...............................................................................................................................12 Nelson Mountain Tuf ..........................................................................................................................12 Cochetopa Park caldera: Relation to Nelson Mountain Tuff (26.9 Ma).....................................13 Structure........................................................................................................................................................15 Northeast-trending graben faults ....................................................................................................15 Caldera faults.......................................................................................................................................15 Rio Grande rift faults and associated volcanism ...........................................................................16 Description of Map Units ............................................................................................................................17 Surficial deposits ................................................................................................................................17 Glacial deposits ..........................................................................................................................17 Old surficial deposits .................................................................................................................17 Miocene postdaldera volcanic rocks ..............................................................................................18 Oligocene volcanic rocks ..................................................................................................................18 Rocks of Cochetopa Park caldera and San Luis caldera complex ...................................18 Rocks of the Nelson Mountain caldera cycle ..............................................................18 Caldera-fill flows and intrusions ...........................................................................18 Caldera-fill volcaniclastic rocks ............................................................................20 Nelson Mountain Tuff ..............................................................................................21 Rocks erupted from the Cebolla Creek caldera ...........................................................22 Rocks erupted from the Rat Creek caldera ..................................................................23 Rocks erupted from South River caldera ...............................................................................23 Younger intermediate-composition lava flows .....................................................................23 Rocks erupted from Bachelor caldera ...................................................................................24 Rocks of La Garita caldera cycle ............................................................................................24 Older tuffs related to western San Juan calderas ...............................................................26 Conejos Formation, upper units ...............................................................................................26 i Caldera-related rocks predating the western and central caldera clusters ...................28 North Pass caldera cycle ................................................................................................29 Volcanics of Cochetopa Hills .................................................................................29 Intrusions of uncertain affinity .......................................................................................31 Bonanza caldera cycle ....................................................................................................31 Volcanic rocks predating Bonanza caldera ..........................................................................32 Conejos Formation, lower units ......................................................................................32 Early ignimbrites erupted from Sawatch Range calderas ..................................................34 Prevolcanic Rocks ..............................................................................................................................34 Mesozoic sedimentary rocks ...................................................................................................35 Paleozoic sedimentary rocks ...................................................................................................35 Precambrian rocks ....................................................................................................................35 References Cited..........................................................................................................................................35 Figures 1. Map of Southern Rocky Mountain volcanic field ............................................................sheet 2 2. Map showing calderas in San Juan volcanic region and location of map area .......sheet 2 3. Map showing northeastern San Juan region and geologic mapping responsibilities .......... .........................................................................................................................................sheet 1 4. Generalized geologic map and section, northeast San Juan region ...........................sheet 2 5. Oblique view (Google Earth) of Cochetopa and North Pass calderas .........................sheet
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Geologic Map of the Central San Juan Caldera Cluster, Southwestern Colorado by Peter W
    Geologic Map of the Central San Juan Caldera Cluster, Southwestern Colorado By Peter W. Lipman Pamphlet to accompany Geologic Investigations Series I–2799 dacite Ceobolla Creek Tuff Nelson Mountain Tuff, rhyolite Rat Creek Tuff, dacite Cebolla Creek Tuff Rat Creek Tuff, rhyolite Wheeler Geologic Monument (Half Moon Pass quadrangle) provides exceptional exposures of three outflow tuff sheets erupted from the San Luis caldera complex. Lowest sheet is Rat Creek Tuff, which is nonwelded throughout but grades upward from light-tan rhyolite (~74% SiO2) into pale brown dacite (~66% SiO2) that contains sparse dark-brown andesitic scoria. Distinctive hornblende-rich middle Cebolla Creek Tuff contains basal surge beds, overlain by vitrophyre of uniform mafic dacite that becomes less welded upward. Uppermost Nelson Mountain Tuff consists of nonwelded to weakly welded, crystal-poor rhyolite, which grades upward to a densely welded caprock of crystal-rich dacite (~68% SiO2). White arrows show contacts between outflow units. 2006 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey CONTENTS Geologic setting . 1 Volcanism . 1 Structure . 2 Methods of study . 3 Description of map units . 4 Surficial deposits . 4 Glacial deposits . 4 Postcaldera volcanic rocks . 4 Hinsdale Formation . 4 Los Pinos Formation . 5 Oligocene volcanic rocks . 5 Rocks of the Creede Caldera cycle . 5 Creede Formation . 5 Fisher Dacite . 5 Snowshoe Mountain Tuff . 6 Rocks of the San Luis caldera complex . 7 Rocks of the Nelson Mountain caldera cycle . 7 Rocks of the Cebolla Creek caldera cycle . 9 Rocks of the Rat Creek caldera cycle . 10 Lava flows premonitory(?) to San Luis caldera complex . .11 Rocks of the South River caldera cycle .
    [Show full text]
  • Tom Sharp's Post
    19 Tom Sharp's Post Tom Sharp's Post, a log and adobe Indian trading station, built in 1870, is a familiar sight to those traveling Highway 305, in Huerfano County, between the remnants of Malachite and the top of Pass Creek Pass. The post, flbout a mile from the site of the once-thriving town called Malachite, stands near the Huerfano River crossing of the Gardner-Red Wing. road. Sharp's place was known as Buzzard Roost Ranch be­ cause hundreds of buzzards roosted in the cottonwood trees along the stream there. A well-traveled Ute Indian trail over the Sangre de Cristo range ran through the ranch, thence to Badito, and on to the Greenhorn Mountains. Ute Chief Ouray and his wife, Chipeta, often visited Sharp while their tribes­ men camped nearby. W. T. (Tom) Sharp, a native of Missouri, served with the Confederate forces at the beginning of the Civil War. His general was Sterling Price. In 1861, Sharp was paroled from the service because of wounds, and was placed in a wagon bound for the Far West. Surviving the trip across country, he joined a half-breed Indian hunter named "Old Tex,'' and for a time the two sup­ plied meat to mining camps in California and Oregon . Later Sharp headed eastward. With a partner, John Miller, he contracted to supply telegraph poles for the Union Pacific Railroad, then building into Wyoming. In 1867, he was a de­ puty sheriff in Cheyenne, Wyoming. In the autumn of 1868, Tom Sharp, John White, and John Williams, with an old prairie wagon, came into the Huerfano Valley looking for a location.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerial Survey Highlights for Colorado 2014
    Aerial Survey Highlights for Colorado 2014 Aerial detection surveys of tree killing or damaging insects and diseases are conducted annually over Colorado’s forest lands. This is a cooperative effort between the US Forest Service and the Colorado State Forest Service. In 2014, 28 million acres were surveyed by 7 trained federal and state surveyors. Highlights of the survey by damage agent are reported below. In 2014, all reported agents are insects that kill and/or defoliate trees. This report includes only forest damage that is visible from the air. Spruce Beetle • Since 1996, spruce beetle has affected approximately 1,397,000 acres to varying degrees in Colorado. • Spruce beetle activity was detected on 485,000 acres in Colorado in 2014. Of these, 253,000 acres are in areas not previously mapped as having spruce beetle activity (new acres). This epidemic continues to expand rapidly (Figures 1, 2). In some areas, the outbreak has moved through entire drainages in the course of one year. In the most heavily impacted drainages, nearly every mature spruce has been killed (Figure 3). • The spruce beetle epidemic is expanding most rapidly in southern Colorado’s Forests and impacts many thousands of acres. Areas affected are found from the La Garita Wilderness Area to north of Cottonwood Pass, the Sangre de Cristo and Wet Mountains, as well as south to the Colorado border and into New Mexico. Aerial survey in south central Colorado showed spruce beetle epidemics expanded on the San Juan (26,000 new acres on 53,000 active acres), Rio Grande (78,000 new acres on 192,000 active acres), Gunnison (54,000 new acres on 79,000 active acres), and San Isabel (26,000 new acres on 31,000 active acres) National Forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphic Correlation Chart for Western Colorado and Northwestern New Mexico
    New Mexico Geological Society Guidebook, 32nd Field Conference, Western Slope Colorado, 1981 75 STRATIGRAPHIC CORRELATION CHART FOR WESTERN COLORADO AND NORTHWESTERN NEW MEXICO M. E. MacLACHLAN U.S. Geological Survey Denver, Colorado 80225 INTRODUCTION De Chelly Sandstone (or De Chelly Sandstone Member of the The stratigraphic nomenclature applied in various parts of west- Cutler Formation) of the west side of the basin is thought to ern Colorado, northwestern New Mexico, and a small part of east- correlate with the Glorieta Sandstone of the south side of the central Utah is summarized in the accompanying chart (fig. 1). The basin. locations of the areas, indicated by letters, are shown on the index map (fig. 2). Sources of information used in compiling the chart are Cols. B.-C. shown by numbers in brackets beneath the headings for the col- Age determinations on the Hinsdale Formation in parts of the umns. The numbers are keyed to references in an accompanying volcanic field range from 4.7 to 23.4 m.y. on basalts and 4.8 to list. Ages where known are shown by numbers in parentheses in 22.4 m.y. on rhyolites (Lipman, 1975, p. 6, p. 90-100). millions of years after the rock name or in parentheses on the line The early intermediate-composition volcanics and related rocks separating two chronostratigraphic units. include several named units of limited areal extent, but of simi- No Quaternary rocks nor small igneous bodies, such as dikes, lar age and petrology—the West Elk Breccia at Powderhorn; the have been included on this chart.
    [Show full text]
  • Cenozoic Thermal, Mechanical and Tectonic Evolution of the Rio Grande Rift
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 91, NO. B6, PAGES 6263-6276, MAY 10, 1986 Cenozoic Thermal, Mechanical and Tectonic Evolution of the Rio Grande Rift PAUL MORGAN1 Departmentof Geosciences,Purdue University,West Lafayette, Indiana WILLIAM R. SEAGER Departmentof Earth Sciences,New Mexico State University,Las Cruces MATTHEW P. GOLOMBEK Jet PropulsionLaboratory, CaliforniaInstitute of Technology,Pasadena Careful documentationof the Cenozoicgeologic history of the Rio Grande rift in New Mexico reveals a complexsequence of events.At least two phasesof extensionhave been identified.An early phase of extensionbegan in the mid-Oligocene(about 30 Ma) and may have continuedto the early Miocene (about 18 Ma). This phaseof extensionwas characterizedby local high-strainextension events (locally, 50-100%,regionally, 30-50%), low-anglefaulting, and the developmentof broad, relativelyshallow basins, all indicatingan approximatelyNE-SW •-25ø extensiondirection, consistent with the regionalstress field at that time.Extension events were not synchronousduring early phase extension and were often temporally and spatiallyassociated with major magmatism.A late phaseof extensionoccurred primarily in the late Miocene(10-5 Ma) with minor extensioncontinuing to the present.It was characterizedby apparently synchronous,high-angle faulting givinglarge verticalstrains with relativelyminor lateral strain (5-20%) whichproduced the moderuRio Granderift morphology.Extension direction was approximatelyE-W, consistentwith the contemporaryregional stress field. Late phasegraben or half-grabenbasins cut and often obscureearly phasebroad basins.Early phase extensionalstyle and basin formation indicate a ductilelithosphere, and this extensionoccurred during the climax of Paleogenemagmatic activity in this zone.Late phaseextensional style indicates a more brittle lithosphere,and this extensionfollowed a middle Miocenelull in volcanism.Regional uplift of about1 km appearsto haveaccompanied late phase extension, andrelatively minor volcanism has continued to thepresent.
    [Show full text]
  • 36 CFR Ch. II (7–1–13 Edition) § 294.49
    § 294.49 36 CFR Ch. II (7–1–13 Edition) subpart shall prohibit a responsible of- Line Includes ficial from further restricting activi- Colorado roadless area name upper tier No. acres ties allowed within Colorado Roadless Areas. This subpart does not compel 22 North St. Vrain ............................................ X the amendment or revision of any land 23 Rawah Adjacent Areas ............................... X 24 Square Top Mountain ................................. X management plan. 25 Troublesome ............................................... X (d) The prohibitions and restrictions 26 Vasquez Adjacent Area .............................. X established in this subpart are not sub- 27 White Pine Mountain. ject to reconsideration, revision, or re- 28 Williams Fork.............................................. X scission in subsequent project decisions Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, Gunnison National Forest or land management plan amendments 29 Agate Creek. or revisions undertaken pursuant to 36 30 American Flag Mountain. CFR part 219. 31 Baldy. (e) Nothing in this subpart waives 32 Battlements. any applicable requirements regarding 33 Beaver ........................................................ X 34 Beckwiths. site specific environmental analysis, 35 Calamity Basin. public involvement, consultation with 36 Cannibal Plateau. Tribes and other agencies, or compli- 37 Canyon Creek-Antero. 38 Canyon Creek. ance with applicable laws. 39 Carson ........................................................ X (f) If any provision in this subpart
    [Show full text]
  • Profiles of Colorado Roadless Areas
    PROFILES OF COLORADO ROADLESS AREAS Prepared by the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region July 23, 2008 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARAPAHO-ROOSEVELT NATIONAL FOREST ......................................................................................................10 Bard Creek (23,000 acres) .......................................................................................................................................10 Byers Peak (10,200 acres)........................................................................................................................................12 Cache la Poudre Adjacent Area (3,200 acres)..........................................................................................................13 Cherokee Park (7,600 acres) ....................................................................................................................................14 Comanche Peak Adjacent Areas A - H (45,200 acres).............................................................................................15 Copper Mountain (13,500 acres) .............................................................................................................................19 Crosier Mountain (7,200 acres) ...............................................................................................................................20 Gold Run (6,600 acres) ............................................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison National Forests DRAFT Wilderness Evaluation Report August 2018
    United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison National Forests DRAFT Wilderness Evaluation Report August 2018 Designated in the original Wilderness Act of 1964, the Maroon Bells-Snowmass Wilderness covers more than 183,000 acres spanning the Gunnison and White River National Forests. In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Tertiary Climate Changes in Southern South America and the Antarctic Peninsula. Part 1: Oceanic Conditions
    Sedimentary Geology 247–248 (2012) 1–20 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Sedimentary Geology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/sedgeo Review A review of Tertiary climate changes in southern South America and the Antarctic Peninsula. Part 1: Oceanic conditions J.P. Le Roux Departamento de Geología, Facultad de Ciencias Físicas y Matemáticas, Universidad de Chile/Centro de Excelencia en Geotérmia de los Andes, Casilla 13518, Correo 21, Santiago, Chile article info abstract Article history: Oceanic conditions around southern South America and the Antarctic Peninsula have a major influence on cli- Received 11 July 2011 mate patterns in these subcontinents. During the Tertiary, changes in ocean water temperatures and currents Received in revised form 23 December 2011 also strongly affected the continental climates and seem to have been controlled in turn by global tectonic Accepted 24 December 2011 events and sea-level changes. During periods of accelerated sea-floor spreading, an increase in the mid- Available online 3 January 2012 ocean ridge volumes and the outpouring of basaltic lavas caused a rise in sea-level and mean ocean temper- ature, accompanied by the large-scale release of CO . The precursor of the South Equatorial Current would Keywords: 2 fi Climate change have crossed the East Paci c Rise twice before reaching the coast of southern South America, thus heating Tertiary up considerably during periods of ridge activity. The absence of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current before South America the opening of the Drake Passage suggests that the current flowing north along the present western seaboard Antarctic Peninsula of southern South American could have been temperate even during periods of ridge inactivity, which might Continental drift explain the generally warm temperatures recorded in the Southeast Pacific from the early Oligocene to mid- Ocean circulation dle Miocene.
    [Show full text]
  • Slow Rates of Subduction Erosion and Coastal Underplating Along the Andean Margin of Chile and Peru: COMMENT and REPLY
    Slow rates of subduction erosion and coastal underplating along the Andean margin of Chile and Peru: COMMENT and REPLY COMMENT: doi: 10.1130/G24305C.1 to Miocene shallow marine and continental strata exposed along the coast of central Chile (33°–35°S). However, if presently exposed Neogene Alfonso Encinas strata in the Caldera basin and central Chile were deposited at depths of Departamento de Ciencias de la Tierra, Universidad de Concepción, ~2000 m, then the paleocoast must have been located tens of kilometers Casilla 160-C, Concepción, Chile to the east. In fact, the easternmost occurrence of shallow marine Pliocene Kenneth L. Finger successions in central Chile is ~40 km from the present coast (Encinas University of California Museum of Paleontology, 1101 Valley Life et al., 2006). Furthermore, marine sequences in central Chile are punc- Sciences Building, Berkeley, California 94720-4780, USA tuated by major unconformities between the Upper Cretaceous, Eocene, and Neogene (Gana et al., 1996). These have been recognized in wells In their article, Clift and Hartley (2007) propose the existence of two drilled on the continental shelf of south-central Chile (~36°–40°S), some alternating modes of subduction erosion for north-central Chile and Peru: located 40 km east of the present coast (Mordojovich, 1981). Whereas the one fast, with steady-state retreat from 150 to 20 Ma, and the other slow, unconformities represent regressive intervals of uplift, nondeposition, and with erosion constrained only in the trench domain from 20 Ma onward. erosion, the position of the paleocoastline must have oscillated widely. The proposed model is intriguing, as it reveals that subduction ero- In conclusion, we share Clift and Hartley’s point of view that there sion is not always by steady-state evolution with mass removal along the are alternating periods of fast and slow tectonic erosion, but we do not entire subduction channel and whole-scale landward retreat.
    [Show full text]
  • Geographic Names
    GEOGRAPHIC NAMES CORRECT ORTHOGRAPHY OF GEOGRAPHIC NAMES ? REVISED TO JANUARY, 1911 WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1911 PREPARED FOR USE IN THE GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE BY THE UNITED STATES GEOGRAPHIC BOARD WASHINGTON, D. C, JANUARY, 1911 ) CORRECT ORTHOGRAPHY OF GEOGRAPHIC NAMES. The following list of geographic names includes all decisions on spelling rendered by the United States Geographic Board to and including December 7, 1910. Adopted forms are shown by bold-face type, rejected forms by italic, and revisions of previous decisions by an asterisk (*). Aalplaus ; see Alplaus. Acoma; township, McLeod County, Minn. Abagadasset; point, Kennebec River, Saga- (Not Aconia.) dahoc County, Me. (Not Abagadusset. AQores ; see Azores. Abatan; river, southwest part of Bohol, Acquasco; see Aquaseo. discharging into Maribojoc Bay. (Not Acquia; see Aquia. Abalan nor Abalon.) Acworth; railroad station and town, Cobb Aberjona; river, IVIiddlesex County, Mass. County, Ga. (Not Ackworth.) (Not Abbajona.) Adam; island, Chesapeake Bay, Dorchester Abino; point, in Canada, near east end of County, Md. (Not Adam's nor Adams.) Lake Erie. (Not Abineau nor Albino.) Adams; creek, Chatham County, Ga. (Not Aboite; railroad station, Allen County, Adams's.) Ind. (Not Aboit.) Adams; township. Warren County, Ind. AJjoo-shehr ; see Bushire. (Not J. Q. Adams.) Abookeer; AhouJcir; see Abukir. Adam's Creek; see Cunningham. Ahou Hamad; see Abu Hamed. Adams Fall; ledge in New Haven Harbor, Fall.) Abram ; creek in Grant and Mineral Coun- Conn. (Not Adam's ties, W. Va. (Not Abraham.) Adel; see Somali. Abram; see Shimmo. Adelina; town, Calvert County, Md. (Not Abruad ; see Riad. Adalina.) Absaroka; range of mountains in and near Aderhold; ferry over Chattahoochee River, Yellowstone National Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC)
    Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Summits on the Air USA - Colorado (WØC) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S46.1 Issue number 3.2 Date of issue 15-June-2021 Participation start date 01-May-2010 Authorised Date: 15-June-2021 obo SOTA Management Team Association Manager Matt Schnizer KØMOS Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Page 1 of 11 Document S46.1 V3.2 Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Change Control Date Version Details 01-May-10 1.0 First formal issue of this document 01-Aug-11 2.0 Updated Version including all qualified CO Peaks, North Dakota, and South Dakota Peaks 01-Dec-11 2.1 Corrections to document for consistency between sections. 31-Mar-14 2.2 Convert WØ to WØC for Colorado only Association. Remove South Dakota and North Dakota Regions. Minor grammatical changes. Clarification of SOTA Rule 3.7.3 “Final Access”. Matt Schnizer K0MOS becomes the new W0C Association Manager. 04/30/16 2.3 Updated Disclaimer Updated 2.0 Program Derivation: Changed prominence from 500 ft to 150m (492 ft) Updated 3.0 General information: Added valid FCC license Corrected conversion factor (ft to m) and recalculated all summits 1-Apr-2017 3.0 Acquired new Summit List from ListsofJohn.com: 64 new summits (37 for P500 ft to P150 m change and 27 new) and 3 deletes due to prom corrections.
    [Show full text]