DOCSLIB.ORG

Local Residents Submissions to Milton Keynes Council Electoral Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Local Residents Submissions to Milton Keynes Council Electoral Review Local residents submissions to Milton Keynes Council electoral review. This PDF document contains 88 submissions from local residents. Some versions of Adobe allow the viewer to move quickly between bookmarks. Click on the submission you would like to view. If you are not taken to that page, please scroll through the document. Hinds, Alex From: Dean Abraham Sent: 19 February 2013 14:02 To: Reviews@ Subject: Boundary Commission Thank you for the letter you sent to me on the Electoral review of Milton Keynes: Draft Recommendations. I live on the east of Milton Keynes in Wavendon Village and at the moment we are represented by one member ward and I wish it to remain this way. 1. We are a collective of villages not a large estate. Wavendon is classed as a rural parish, whilst Caldecotte, Browns Wood and Wavendon Gate are large modern estates We are an old rural village just on the outskirts with a boundary separating us from all of these estates. Our needs differ greatly than those on these estates. 2. I feel that one person can deal effectively with the issues of our village and understand them fully, I do not understand how it will work with three councillors trying to manage a large chunk of Milton Keynes. There will now be thousands of people and three councillors trying to meet differing needs. How will these councillors deal with issues on a personal basis. 3. Will these councillors have the same views? or differing so causing conflict with residents. If so will a compromise have to be reached so diluting the outcome? 4. Our village will be swamped and outvoted on issues because villages/estates have different views/needs. These differences are already very apparent, after sitting in on meetings concerning the Core Strategy with residents from Wavendon Gate, and the Walton Parish coming to our local meetings concerning the Core Strategy the residents and the Walton Parish who represent the large estates have totally differing views which could be very detrimental to our village. 5. Our voices from the villages will be few in comparison to the large estates and we will be silenced. The Commission received a significant number of submissions relating to the existing Danesborough Ward, You must take on board our concerns Many Thanks D Abraham 1 Fuller, Heather From: Malcolm Anderson Sent: 11 February 2013 14:35 To: Reviews@ Subject: Milton Keynes Ward Boundaries Review Officer for Milton Keynes Local Gov Boundary Commission for England Here in Old Woughton Parish we have only recently successfully campaigned for the establishment of our own new parish, independent of Woughton Community Council, and were disturbed to be presented with the prospect of reversion to the previous situation by being warded with those who did not always sympathise with our priorities and who do not share our living environment. I understand however that the Commission has recommended a ward that includes Simpson one side of us, and Woolstone the other side. This will give us the character of community we have so clearly asked for and fully meets all our aspirations. I would like to express my appreciation to the Commission for its understanding and trust that this recommendation will be adopted. Sincerely M.F.Anderson 1 Andrew Turner Member of the public 17/02/2013 18:29 It is important to have boundaries that reflect communities. Communities are based on historical continuities and interests. Suggestions that an historic town and active community such as Newport Pagnell is lost in boundary changes fly in the face of sensibilities when we are trying to reinvigorate civic pride and identity. Don't let this happen. Fuller, Heather From: Fuller, Heather Sent: 12 March 2013 10:35 To: Hinds, Alex Subject: FW: MK Council boundary review ‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐ From: Sent: 12 March 2013 10:34 To: Reviews@ Subject: MK Council boundary review Hello, Please can I express my support for the equalising of wards in Milton Keynes such that each ward has 3 councillors. It seems iniquitous that some voters get three votes every 4 years while some only get 1 which is the case for some wards currently. best wishes, 1 My submission relates to the boundary changes for Emerson Valley Ward. This would mean splitting it into two, to become Shenley Brook End Ward and Bletchley West Ward. Having surveyed the evidence and the fact that the creation of two wards would mean extra councillors, I have to say I am in favour of this decision. Patricia Appleswick Member of the public 12/02/2013 16:07 "Dear Madam / Sir, I would like to add my endorsement to the proposed wards for Milton Keynes. In particular the proposals for Old Woughton. Having looked at the situation myself, I can see how difficult it is to balance the numbers with the complex local communities. I can see no fairer arrangements for this. In my experience, the idea of keeping Newport Pagnell in one ward would purely be a political motivation by one particular group. So no point going with that based on the unfair electoral imbalance it would create or by chopping off a bit of it and sticking it in some far flung rural community that has never heard of it. I hope that my comments will be taken into account, I am just a humble member of the public, not a powerful political beast, but I know Milton Keynes and trust your consultation is fair. Regards, Pat and Gordon " Fuller, Heather From: Terry Ashton Sent: 10 February 2013 15:25 To: Reviews@ Subject: Milton Keynes Ward Boundaries Dear Sirs Having learnt of the proposed new ward to incorporate Old Woughton with Woolstones and Simpson, I should like to express my full support for this proposal. This new ward would combine old villages that retain their village character even when being embedded in a wider supportive community. It certainly fulfils our desire to be linked to similar areas to our own. I sincerely hope it will be possible for this proposal to be agreed and put into operation. Yours faithfully Pauline Ashton 1 Fuller, Heather From: Sue Barlow Sent: 22 February 2013 13:49 To: Reviews@ Subject: Ward Boundary Review, Old Woughton Dear Sir I am writing to thank you for listening to the views of local people and proposing to place Old Woughton Parish in a ward with Simpson, Woolstone etc. I feel that this proposal is entirely satisfactory and far better than the original suggestion. I feel that it helps to preserve the character of our area. The estates that we would be together with feel congruous from a geographical point of view and similar in terms of having an old village as the centre of their communities. It is an area that is shared in many ways and makes sense in that it feels as though we share a community with these other estates. Many thanks for your support with this issue. I hope that this proposal is confirmed. Sue Barlow 1 Carole Baume Private individual Member of the public 09/03/2013 18:46 I wish to have my say against your proposal for the new Campbell Park and Old Woughton Ward. I live in the very south of this proposed ward, in Ashland. I feel no connection at all to the communities in the north of this proposed ward. Currently Ashland (along with Simpson, which together form Simpson and Ashland Parish) is in the Bletchley and Fenny Stratford Ward. If it is not possible to stay in that ward, it would make much more sense to put Simpson and Ashland with Netherfield, Beanhill and Tinkers Bridge in a new version of a Woughton Ward. Our local shops are in Tinkers Bridge and Netherfield and our health centre is in Beanhill. Hinds, Alex From: Bill Beesley Sent: 21 February 2013 15:39 To: Reviews@ Subject: Milton Keynes Ward Boundaries Thank you for taking our views into consideration when deciding this issue. Whilst the new ward to which you are proposing our area belongs (We are in Woughton Park) is of the oddest shape, it does broadly follow the social and community boundaries that prevail in Milton Keynes and for that, we thank you. It will also enable us to maintain a degree of independence from our neighbourimg big "bully boy" wards. Bill and Linda Beesley 1 Fuller, Heather From: Stuart Bennett Sent: 19 February 2013 10:21 To: Reviews@ Subject: Milton Keynes boundary review 2013 Dear Sir/ Madam As a resident of Old Woughton Parish, may I express my wholehearted support for your recommendation of a new ward of Campbell Park and Old Woughton in Milton Keynes. The Local Government Boundary Commission seems to have taken on board the submissions made by the residents and I thank you for this. I am sure that the residents will be well served by MK Councillors representing this new ward. Stuart W Bennett 1 Fuller, Heather From: gpbowles Sent: 15 February 2013 14:12 To: Reviews@ Subject: Old Woughton Parish Council, Milton Keynes Ward boundary review of Milton Keynes Draft proposals for the parish of Old Woughton, I am a resident of Woughton Park in the parish of Old Woughton, Milton Keynes and have now had the opportunity to digest the draft proposals affecting our area. Firstly, let me compliment the Commission on its hard work on developing the draft proposals to date. The report is very comprehensive and whilst it is unlikely to please everyone I believe it goes a long way to meeting its prime objectives and to propose a fair and sensible solution for Old Woughton that recognises the importance of character and community.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • COVID-19 Snapshot 555 2 5,004 1,948 8.2% 777 9,904 134,214
    COVID-19 Snapshot As of 28th July 2021 (data reported up to 25th July 2021) Population 269,457 Total individuals Total COVID-19 Percentage of Adults vaccinated Adults vaccinated tested cases individuals that tested with 1st dose with 2nd dose positive (positivity) by 18-Jul by 18-Jul DATA NOT DATA NOT AVAILABLE0 * 24,726 AVAILABLE * 182,789 134,214 0.0% of population 76.8% of 18+ population 56.4% of 18+ population Number of Covid-19 cases PCR test Positivity Adults vaccinated Adults vaccinated PCR tests in in the in the with 1st dose with 2nd dose the last 7 days last 7 days last 7 days in the last 7 days in the last 7 days 9,904 777 8.2% 1,948 5,004 direction of travel -2,354 direction of travel -477 direction of travel -1.9% direction of travel -700 direction of travel +366 Direction of travel compares current snapshot against previous snapshot key: Increasing l no change decreasing Number of COVID-19 cases and All cases by Last 7 days by deaths by week age and gender age and gender 3,000 CASES DEATHS 100 FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE 2,700 2,400 90+ 90+ 75 2,100 80 to 89 80 to 89 1,800 70 to 79 70 to 79 1,500 50 60 to 69 60 to 69 1,200 50 to 59 50 to 59 Positive cases Positive 900 40 to 49 40 to 49 25 Registered deaths 600 30 to 39 30 to 39 300 20 to 29 20 to 29 0 0 10 to 19 10 to 19 0 to 9 0 to 9 25 Jul25 11 Jul 3,040 0 3,040 120 60 0 60 120 18 Oct18 Apr04 04 Oct 18 Apr 10 Jan10 Jun27 24 Jan 13 Jun 07 Feb 07 07Mar 21 Feb 21 Mar 15 Nov15 Dec13 01 Nov 29 Nov 27 Dec 02 May 02 May 30 16 May Week ending only age groups with more than
    [Show full text]
  • Canal, Marina and Waterway
    NEWSLETTER - ISSUE 1 HIGHLIGHTS IN THIS ISSUE • Check out the masterplan WELCOME • Marvel at the new marina TO CAMPBELL WHARF • Discover the site’s history Welcome to the first Campbell Wharf Newsletter, bringing you all the latest news on Crest Nicholson’s exciting canalside development in Milton Keynes. Overlooking the Grand Union Canal, Campbell Wharf will include 383 new homes, a 111 berth marina, a canal-side pub, café, restaurant and a landmark new footbridge linking the two sides of the Canal. This fantastic range of amenities will bring many social and CAMPBELL WHARF FACT FILE community benefits to the local area. The development will provide a new destination on the Grand Union Canal and deliver additional access routes • 383 new homes for pedestrians and cyclists, as well as encouraging the • 111 berth marina use of existing routes around the local area. • 9,200 sq ft commercial space • Landmark footbridge • 30% affordable housing 1 DISCOVER CAMPBELL WHARF LOCATION & SURROUNDING ARCHAEOLOGY & SITE VILLAGES HISTORY Campbell Wharf sits between Newlands and Archaeological investigations were undertaken on the Campbell Park in Central Milton Keynes, with the site before any building work could begin. The team Grand Union Canal passing through the middle of uncovered ancient artefacts and remains that suggest the site. the land was used historically for farming, along with some late Iron Age and early Roman pottery - though The development stretches across the Wards of sadly not enough to suggest a domestic settlement. Campbell Park, Old Woughton and Central Milton Larger quantities of pottery artefacts were found Keynes, and is also split across the Parishes of both within an area used for crop processing, where the Campbell Park and Central Milton Keynes.
    [Show full text]
  • Milton Keynes Council - Appointments to Outside Bodies
    MILTON KEYNES COUNCIL - APPOINTMENTS TO OUTSIDE BODIES POLICY AND RESOURCES ORGANISATION CURRENT REPRESENTATIVE EXPIRY DATE TERM OF OFFICE Association of Councils in Representatives: the Thames Valley Region Vacant (ACTVAR) Councillor K Wilson Deputies: May 1999 Annual Councillor Bartlett Councillor Pym Observers: Councillor Hopkins Councillor Tallack Bedford/Milton Councillor Bristow May 1999 Annual Keynes/Northampton Councillor Ellis Regional Forum Councillor I Henderson Councillor K Wilson Bucks Association of Local Councillor Tapp May 1999 Annual Councils Bucks Forum Councillor Hopkins Councillor O’Sullivan May 1999 Annual 1 Vacancy Buckinghamshire Councillor Edwards May 1999 Annual Superannuation Fund Investment Board L:\Resources IT\mel\Minutes to be converted\1998-99\enl_Minutes_10945_Minutes_ANNEX.doc 1 L:\Resources IT\mel\Minutes to be converted\1998-99\enl_Minutes_10945_Minutes_ANNEX.doc 2 POLICY AND RESOURCES (2) ORGANISATION APPOINTMENTS MADE EXPIRY DATE TERM OF OFFICE CNT Local Liaison Councillor Bates Committee Councillor Bristow Councillor I Henderson May 1999 Annual Councillor Miller Councillor O’Sullivan Councillor K Wilson Health Authorities and Local Councillor Conchie (Rep) Authorities in Bucks JCC Councillor I Wilson (Deputy) May 1999 Annual Local Government Councillor Kilkenny Association General Councillor Pym May 1999 Annual Assembly Councillor K Wilson 1 Vacancy Local Government Councillor Conchie May 1999 Annual Association New Towns Special Interest Group Local Government Councillor Edwards Association Urban
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19 Snapshot As of 23Rd June 2021 (Data Reported up to 20Th June 2021)
    COVID-19 Snapshot As of 23rd June 2021 (data reported up to 20th June 2021) Population 269,457 Total individuals Total COVID-19 Percentage of Adults vaccinated Adults vaccinated tested cases individuals that tested with 1st dose with 2nd dose positive (positivity) by 13-Jun by 13-Jun 170,587 20,878 12.2% 162,269 105,018 63.3% of population 66.4% of 16+ population 43.0% of 16+ population Number of Covid-19 cases PCR test Positivity Adults vaccinated Adults vaccinated PCR tests in in the in the with 1st dose with 2nd dose the last 7 days last 7 days last 7 days in the last 7 days in the last 7 days 8,219 188 2.3% 7,947 8,048 direction of travel +990 direction of travel +14 direction of travel -0.1% direction of travel +2,267 direction of travel -3,007 direction of travel Direction of travel compares current snapshot against previous snapshot key: Increasing l no change decreasing Number of COVID-19 cases and All cases by Last 7 days by deaths by week age and gender age and gender 3,000 CASES DEATHS 100 FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE 2,700 2,400 90+ 90+ 75 2,100 80 to 89 80 to 89 1,800 70 to 79 70 to 79 1,500 50 60 to 69 60 to 69 1,200 50 to 59 50 to 59 Positive cases 900 40 to 49 40 to 49 25 Registered deaths 600 30 to 39 30 to 39 300 20 to 29 20 to 29 0 0 10 to 19 10 to 19 0 to 9 0 to 9 2,640 0 2,640 40 20 0 20 40 11 Oct 25 Oct 11 Apr 25 Apr 20 Jun 03 Jan 17 Jan 31 Jan 06 Jun 14 Mar 28 Mar 14 Feb 28 Feb 08 Nov 22 Nov 30 Aug 13 Sep 27 Sep 06 Dec 20 Dec 09 May 23 May Week ending only age groups with more than two cases will be shown Most
    [Show full text]
  • Index Class: Minor Applications Min 01 09/00637
    INDEX CLASS: MINOR APPLICATIONS No. Reference Address Ward Parish Report Plan(s) Page Page MIN 01 09/00637/FUL 111 Buckingham Bletchley & West 14 28 Road Fenny Bletchley Bletchley Stratford Town Council MIN 02 09/01873/FUL Five Acres Bletchley & Simpson 34 44 Nursing Home Fenny Parish Simpson Stratford Council MIN 03 09/01923/FUL 8 Marshworth Woughton Woughton 52 63 Tinkers Bridge Community Council MIN 04 09/02119/FUL Milton Keynes Woughton Woughton 67 73 General Hospital Community Standing Way Council Eaglestone MIN 05 09/02264/FUL Church View Sherington Moulsoe 76 86 Bungalow Parish Newport Road Council Moulsoe MIN 06 09/02292/FUL Church Farm Sherington Sherington 90 97 Church End Parish Sherington Council MIN 07 10/00100/FUL Glebe House Hanslope park Hanslope 102 106 Forest Road Parish Hanslope Council MIN 08 10/00271/FUL 7 Anglesey Court Loughton Park Loughton 109 118 Great Holm Parish Council Index cont……………… CLASS: OTHER APPLICATIONS No. Reference Address Ward Parish Report Plan(s) Page Page OTH 01 09/01872/FUL 1 Rose Cottages Wolverton Wolverton & 122 130 Mill End Greenleys Wolverton Mill Town Council OTH 02 09/01907/FUL 6 Twyford Lane Walton park Walton 135 140 Walnut Tree parish Council OTH 03 09/02161/FUL 16 Stanbridge Stony Stony 143 148 Court Stratford Stratford Stony Stratford Town Council OTH 04 09/02217/FUL 220A Wolverton Linford North Great Linford 152 159 Road Parish Blakelands Council OTH 05 10/00117/FUL 98 High Street Olney Olney Town 162 166 Olney Council OTH 06 10/00049/FUL 63 Wolverton Newport Newport 168 174 Road Pagnell North Pagnell Newport Pagnell Town Council OTH 07 10/00056/FUL 24 Sitwell Close Newport Newport 177 182 Newport Pagnell Pagnell North Pagnell Town Council CLASS: OTHER APPLICATIONS – HOUSES IN MULTIPLE OCCUPATION No.
    [Show full text]
  • Sport Venues
    WORLD SPORTS VENUES USING ACO PRODUCTS Sports Venue: ACO Product: United States Los Angeles Olympic Stadium, CA System 4000 Drain Atlanta Olympic Stadium, GA System 2000 Drain University of Georgia, GA System 1000 Drain University of Oklahoma, OK System 2000 Drain University of Houston, TX System 2000/4000 Drain University of Nebraska, NE System 3000 Drain University of Texas at Austin, TX System K Drain Florida State University, FL System 1000 Drain UCLA Drake Stadium, CA System 1000 Drain Jesse Owens Track, Ohio State University, OH System 2000/4000 Drain University of California at Berkeley, CA System 3000/K Drain California State University at Sacramento, CA System 2000 Drain University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC System 3000 Drain University of North Carolina at Charlotte, NC System 2000 Drain University of Buffalo, NY System 4000 Drain Brown University, RI System 6000 Drain North Carolina State University, NC System 2000 Drain Millikan University, IL System 2000 Drain Mitchell Park, New York, NY System 2000/3000 Drain Texas Christian University, TX System 2000 Drain Indiana University, Purdue Uni. Indianopolis, IN System 2000 Drain National Sports Center, Blaine, MN System 2000 Drain Southern Illinois University, IL System 4000 Drain University of Minnesota, MN System 1000 Drain Columbia University, System 4000 Drain United States Naval Acadamy, MD System 2000 Drain War Memorial Stadium, Hawaii, HI System 4000 Drain Peterson Air Force Base, CO System 4000 Drain Cleveland Browns Stadium, OH System 4000 Drain Tennessee Titans
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19 Snapshot As of 3Rd March 2021 (Data Reported up to 28Th February 2021)
    COVID-19 Snapshot As of 3rd March 2021 (data reported up to 28th February 2021) Population 269,457 Total individuals Total COVID-19 Percentage of individuals that Adults vaccinated with tested cases tested positive (positivity) at least 1 dose by 21-Feb 123,608 19,155 15.5% 55,325 45.9% of population 26.7% of 16+ population Individuals tested Covid-19 cases Test positivity in the Adults vaccinated with in the last 7 days in the last 7 days last 7 days at least 1 dose last 7 days Data Not available 2,106 265 12.6% 1st week direction of travel +204 direction of travel -85 direction of travel -5.8% direction of travel Direction of travel compares current snapshot against previous snapshot key: Increasing l no change decreasing Number of COVID-19 cases and All cases by Last 7 days by deaths by week age and gender age and gender 3,000 CASES DEATHS 100 FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE 2,700 2,400 90+ 90+ 75 2,100 80 to 89 80 to 89 1,800 70 to 79 70 to 79 1,500 50 60 to 69 60 to 69 1,200 50 to 59 50 to 59 Positive cases 900 40 to 49 40 to 49 25 Registered deaths 600 30 to 39 30 to 39 300 20 to 29 20 to 29 0 0 10 to 19 10 to 19 0 to 9 0 to 9 05 Jul 19 Jul 25 Oct 11 Oct 2,400 0 2,400 40 20 0 20 40 07 Jun 21 Jun 03 Jan 17 Jan 31 Jan 14 Feb 28 Feb 08 Nov 22 Nov 06 Dec 20 Dec 02 Aug 16 Aug 30 Aug 13 Sep 27 Sep 10 May 24 May Week ending only age groups with more than two cases will be shown Most affected wards in the Hospital bed occupancy and last 7 days patients with COVID-19 Number of Rate per 1,000 population cases Last 7 days Milton Keynes University
    [Show full text]
  • Raising Awareness of Hate Crime Inside
    TeThe Newsletteram of MK CentreTa for Integratedlk Living Autumn 2015 Issue 5 Raising Awareness of Hate Crime inside www.mkcil.org.uk Supporting disabled people, their families and carers CIL_Teamtalk_Autumn_2015_1-32.indd 1 09/11/2015 12:35:05 Getting in touch with Milton Keynes CIL Milton Keynes Centre for Integrated Living 330 Saxon Gate West, Central Milton Keynes, MK9 2ES Tel: 01908 231 344 Fax: 01908 231 335 Minicom: 01908 231 505 email: [email protected] Web: www.mkcil.org.uk You can find PORTWAY H5 us inside the Milton Keynes City Church, SILBURY BOULEVARD in Central Milton Keynes. CHURCH Registered MIDSUMMER BOULEVARD Charity No. SAXON GATE 1096402 AVEBURY BOULEVARD Registered Company No. 4391864 2 TeamTalk Autumn 2015 CIL_Teamtalk_Autumn_2015_1-32.indd 2 09/11/2015 12:35:07 Inside this issue of TeamTalk 11 2Getting in touch with MK CIL 4-5 Message from the Chief Executive 6-7 Fundraising 4 20 at MK CIL 8MK CIL Diary 9Forthcoming Events 18 Trustee Profile 10 MK Community 19 Bank Holiday Closures Foundation Raffle and Jokes 11 MK Dons 20-21 Raising Awareness Disability Football Club of Hate Crime 12 About MK CIL 22-23 News from the ULOs 13 Mission Statement 24-25 DisabledGo 14-15 Staff Profile 26-27 Community Car Scheme 16 Volunteer Profile 28-31 Disability: 17 Welcome! Facts and Statistics For any contributions for future editions of TeamTalk please contact: Annette Holcroft, Editor: [email protected] or Allison Carlton, Network and Engagement Manager: [email protected] Tel: 01908 231 344 To advertise in future editions please call: 01327 353 753 or email: [email protected] Published by Focus Magazine Group on behalf of Milton Keynes CIL Milton Keynes Centre for Integrated Living 01908 231 344 3 CIL_Teamtalk_Autumn_2015_1-32.indd 3 09/11/2015 12:35:10 Message from the Chief Executive Hi all.
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19 Snapshot As of 4Th August 2021 (Data Reported up to 1St August 2021)
    COVID-19 Snapshot As of 4th August 2021 (data reported up to 1st August 2021) Population 269,457 Total individuals Total COVID-19 Percentage of Adults vaccinated Adults vaccinated tested cases individuals that tested with 1st dose with 2nd dose positive (positivity) by 25-Jul by 25-Jul 190,116 25,511 13.4% 184,144 139,680 70.6% of population 77.3% of 18+ population 58.7% of 18+ population Number of Covid-19 cases PCR test Positivity Adults vaccinated Adults vaccinated PCR tests in in the in the with 1st dose with 2nd dose the last 7 days last 7 days last 7 days in the last 7 days in the last 7 days 9,035 782 8.7% 1,355 5,466 direction of travel -869 direction of travel +5 direction of travel +0.5% direction of travel -593 direction of travel +462 Direction of travel compares current snapshot against previous snapshot key: Increasing l no change decreasing Number of COVID-19 cases and All cases by Last 7 days by deaths by week age and gender age and gender 3,000 CASES DEATHS 100 FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE 2,700 2,400 90+ 90+ 75 2,100 80 to 89 80 to 89 1,800 70 to 79 70 to 79 1,500 50 60 to 69 60 to 69 1,200 50 to 59 50 to 59 Positive cases 900 40 to 49 40 to 49 25 Registered deaths 600 30 to 39 30 to 39 300 20 to 29 20 to 29 0 0 10 to 19 10 to 19 0 to 9 0 to 9 18 Jul 04 Jul 3,120 0 3,120 120 60 0 60 120 11 Apr 25 Apr 11 Oct 25 Oct 03 Jan 17 Jan 31 Jan 06 Jun 20 Jun 28 Mar 14 Mar 14 Feb 28 Feb 22 Nov 06 Dec 20 Dec 01 Aug 08 Nov 09 May 23 May Week ending only age groups with more than two cases will be shown Most affected Hospital bed
    [Show full text]
  • Updated Electorate Proforma 11Oct2012
    Electoral data 2012 2018 Using this sheet: Number of councillors: 51 51 Fill in the cells for each polling district. Please make sure that the names of each parish, parish ward and unitary ward are Overall electorate: 178,504 190,468 correct and consistant. Check your data in the cells to the right. Average electorate per cllr: 3,500 3,735 Polling Electorate Electorate Number of Electorate Variance Electorate Description of area Parish Parish ward Unitary ward Name of unitary ward Variance 2018 district 2012 2018 cllrs per ward 2012 2012 2018 Bletchley & Fenny 3 10,385 -1% 11,373 2% Stratford Bradwell 3 9,048 -14% 8,658 -23% Campbell Park 3 10,658 2% 10,865 -3% Danesborough 1 3,684 5% 4,581 23% Denbigh 2 5,953 -15% 5,768 -23% Eaton Manor 2 5,976 -15% 6,661 -11% AA Church Green West Bletchley Church Green Bletchley & Fenny Stratford 1872 2,032 Emerson Valley 3 12,269 17% 14,527 30% AB Denbigh Saints West Bletchley Saints Bletchley & Fenny Stratford 1292 1,297 Furzton 2 6,511 -7% 6,378 -15% AC Denbigh Poets West Bletchley Poets Bletchley & Fenny Stratford 1334 1,338 Hanslope Park 1 4,139 18% 4,992 34% AD Central Bletchley Bletchley & Fenny Stratford Central Bletchley Bletchley & Fenny Stratford 2361 2,367 Linford North 2 6,700 -4% 6,371 -15% AE Simpson Simpson & Ashland Simpson Village Bletchley & Fenny Stratford 495 497 Linford South 2 7,067 1% 7,635 2% AF Fenny Stratford Bletchley & Fenny Stratford Fenny Stratford Bletchley & Fenny Stratford 1747 2,181 Loughton Park 3 12,577 20% 14,136 26% AG Granby Bletchley & Fenny Stratford Granby Bletchley
    [Show full text]
  • December 2018
    Unitary Councillors Report December 2018 Appendix A Unitary Councillor Report (Snippets) Report from Cllr David Hopkins, Cllr Victoria Hopkins & Cllr Alice Jenkins – Representing Bow Brickhill at MK Council December 2018 Wavendon Properties - TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 – SECTION 78 APPEAL MADE BY WAVENDON PROPERTIES LIMITED LAND TWO THE EAST OF NEWPORT ROAD AND TO THE EAST AND WEST OF CRANFIELD ROAD AT WOBURN SANDS, BUCKINGHAM, MK17 8UH APPLICATION REF: 16/00672/OUT Inspector’s recommendation and summary of the decision • The Inspector recommended that the appeal be allowed and planning permission granted, subject to conditions. • For the reasons given below, the Secretary of State disagrees with the Inspector’s recommendation. He has decided to dismiss the appeal and refuse planning permission. DELEGATED DECISION - 20 NOVEMBER 2018 INTRODUCTION OF 20MPH SPEED RESTRICTIONS INTO NEW AND EXISTING RESIDENTIAL ESTATES. The Council Plan 2016 – 2020 sets out how Milton Keynes Council will work to achieve its ambitions for Milton Keynes and includes a Transport commitment to introduce 20mph speed limits into new estates and to support any community that requests a 20mph speed limit. Unitary Councillors Report December 2018 Snippets • Levante Gate – spoken with officers and no further contact from Guinness so I suggest this issue has been put on the back burner. • Blocked Gullies – residents in Bow Brickhill are naturally concerned by the fact that the guillies still appear blocked causing pooling and pedestrians risking getting soaked by passing vehicles. Carl Devereaux writes; The Gullies and Side entry kerb weirs where cleared as part of the whole of Bow Brickhill as requested by the Local Council September 2018 At the time it was requested to have Serco in to clear the excessive silt in the kerb lines in this location and the rest of the village.
    [Show full text]
  • Woughton Community Neighbourhood Plan 2017 - 2031
    WOUGHTON COMMUNITY NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN 2017 - 2031 FINAL PLAN Made, November 2017 Published by Woughton Community Council. 1 FOREWORD The Woughton Parish is a unique area set inside the setting of the UK’s most successful New Town. However , it faces many challenges including high deprivation levels and the lowest quality of health in Milton Keynes with the life expectancy some 10 years shorter than any other ward in the city. However , this has not stopped the local residents in Woughton forming tightknit connections and a strong sense of community. Four of the seven residential estates in Woughton have been identified by Milton Keynes Council as part of a major 15 year Regeneration Programme. While the intentions of this programme are aimed at improving the overall quality of life in the identified areas, it has also led to many residents feeling concerned over the potential consequences on their homes and everyday lives. Prepared by Woughton Community Council, the goal of the Woughton Community Neighbourhood Plan (WCNP) is not to stop development altogether, but it is to encourage the right types of development to occur based on the priorities of the current population. The WCNP Steering Group was formed in June 2015 and is made up of Parish Councillors, residential representatives, and other local stakeholders that together combine their local knowledge and skills to better guide the development of the Neighbourhood Plan. Their efforts in promoting the importance of the Neighbourhood Plan have been key in its formation. Thank you to all that have already participated, and to everyone who has worked so hard to get the Woughton Community Neighbourhood Plan to this stage.
    [Show full text]