DOCSLIB.ORG

Survival and Growth Rate of Translocated Freshwater Mussels <I>Lampsilis Fasciola</I> and <I>Medionidus Conrad

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Survival and Growth Rate of Translocated Freshwater Mussels <I>Lampsilis Fasciola</I> and <I>Medionidus Conrad University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 8-2015 Survival and Growth Rate of Translocated Freshwater Mussels Lampsilis fasciola and Medionidus conradicus Laura L. Pullum University of Tennessee - Knoxville, [email protected] Recommended Citation Pullum, Laura L., "Survival and Growth Rate of Translocated Freshwater Mussels Lampsilis fasciola and Medionidus conradicus. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2015. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/3501 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Laura L. Pullum entitled "Survival and Growth Rate of Translocated Freshwater Mussels Lampsilis fasciola and Medionidus conradicus." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Geology. Michael McKinney, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Colin Sumrall, Brian Alford Accepted for the Council: Dixie L. Thompson Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official student records.) Survival(and(Growth(Rate(of(Translocated( Freshwater(Mussels(Lampsilis(fasciola(and( Medionidus(conradicus( ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! A!Thesis!Presented!for!the! Master!of!Science! Degree! The!University!of!Tennessee,!Knoxville! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Laura!L.!Pullum! August!2015! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Copyright!©!2015!by!Laura!L.!Pullum.!! All!rights!reserved.! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ii! ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS( ! I!would!like!to!thank!my!advisor,!Dr.!Michael!McKinney,!for!his!introduction!to,!and! guidance!in,!the!field!of!freshwater!mussel!conservation.!Comments!and! encouragement!from!my!committee!members,!Dr.!Colin!Sumrall!and!Dr.!Brian! Alford,!have!been!greatly!appreciated.!In!the!field,!I!thank!Don!Hubbs!and!other! Tennessee!Wildlife!Resources!Agency!(TWRA)!personnel!for!the!knowledge!they! passed!on!and!for!their!patience.!For!their!support!in!conducting!mussel!retrieval! and!measurement,!I!thank!Dr.!McKinney’s!undergraduate!ecology!students!(at!the! University!of!Tennessee).!!Thanks!to!Megan!Bradley!of!the!Aquatic!Wildlife! Conservation!Center!(AWCC)!for!length!data!on!the!control!group!of!Lampsilis( fasciola.!!Thanks!to!Sarah!Sheffield,!Michael!Lucas!and!Dr.!Josh!Emery!for!pleasant! greetings!at!all!times.!Thanks!to!Angie!Staley!in!the!Environmental!and!Planetary! Sciences!office!for!her!help!navigating!the!systems.!!My!sincere!appreciation!goes!to! Josh!Price!for!his!support!using!SAS!and!for!fruitful!discussions!on!mixed!model! ANOVA.!!Last,!though!not!least,!thanks!to!Jan!Pullum!for!hanging!in!there.! ! iii! ABSTRACT( ! Freshwater!mussels!(Family!Unionidae!and!Margaritiferidae)!are!a!widely! threatened!group!of!bivalve!molluscs,!particularly!in!the!Southeastern!United!States.!! Translocation!of!freshwater!mussels!is!an!increasingly!common!conservation! method.!However,!there!are!relatively!few!studies!that!quantitatively!investigate!the! factors!influencing!translocation!success!or!failure.!In!October!2013,!hundreds!of! Medionidus(conradicus!and!Lampsilis(fasciola!were!translocated!to!the!Pigeon!and! Nolichucky!Rivers!in!Tennessee,!with!an!interim!partial!survey!(June!2014)!and!a! full!survey!(October!2014).!!In!this!study,!I!analyze!this!field\collected!data!to! determine!the!mechanism(s)!that!currently!influence!the!outcomes!of!Tennessee! mussel!translocation.!!! ! My!recommendations!for!future!surveys!include!open!and!timely!data!sharing! between!investigators!and!the!scientific!community!at!large.!!Given!these!data!and! associated!collection!methods,!a!better!understanding!of!freshwater!mussel! communities!and!restoration!success!factors!can!be!identified!at!lower!future!costs! and!facilitate!longer\term!research.!!My!research!recommendations!include!more! frequent,!complete!surveys,!and!quantitative!analyses!at!the!mussel!and!community! levels.! The!results!of!this!study!have!implications!for!conservation!translocation!efforts.!! My!results!indicate!that!both!L.(fasciola!and!M.(conradicus!can!be!successfully! translocated!to!the!Pigeon!River,!if!1)!they!are!translocated!to!the!Pigeon!where!it! has!less!boulder,!cobble!and!exposed!bedrock!in!favor!of!more!coarse!and!fine! gravel!and!sand;!2)!it!had!lower!peak!and!average!water!discharge!rates,!3)!if!some! translocations!occurred!in!the!spring\early!summer,!and!4)!if!the!translocated! mussels!are!initially!housed!in!cages!or!silos.!The!non\housed!mussels!were!not! recovered,!primarily!due!to!high!water!volumes!and!velocities!soon!after!the! beginning!of!the!study.!!The!housed!mussels!were!protected.!There!is!no!overall! iv! predictability!of!the!water!discharge!timing!and!size!of!the!Waterville!Hydroelectric! Power!plant’s!dam.!A!management!recommendation!is!for!incremental!releases!and! notification!to!conservation!authorities.!Due!to!significant!mortality!in!the!first!8! months!of!this!study,!some!studies!should!start!in!the!spring\early!summer!rather! than!in!October!to!help!translocated!mussels!survive!their!first!over\winter!by! having!some!growth!and!habitat!acclimation!underway.! ! ! v! TABLE(OF(CONTENTS! ! CHAPTER!1!INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 1! 1.1! The Rise and Fall of Freshwater Mussel Fauna ..................................................... 1! 1.2! Habitat Factors that Influence Freshwater Mussel Mortality and Growth ............ 2! 1.3! Tennessee Efforts to Restore Freshwater Mussels ................................................. 5! 1.4! Research Study ..................................................................................................... 15! CHAPTER!2!SITE!AND!SPECIES!BACKGROUND ............................................................ 16! 2.1! Sites ...................................................................................................................... 16! 2.1.1! Clinch River at Kyles Ford ........................................................................... 18! 2.1.2! Nolichucky River .......................................................................................... 18! 2.1.3! Pigeon River at Cosby Creek ........................................................................ 19! 2.1.4! Brood Stock from the VDGIF AWCC .......................................................... 19! 2.2! Species ................................................................................................................. 20! 2.2.1! Lampsilis fasciola ......................................................................................... 20! 2.2.2! Medionidus conradicus ................................................................................. 23! CHAPTER!3!MATERIALS!AND!METHODS ..................................................................... 26! 3.1! Overview .............................................................................................................. 26! 3.2! Translocation ........................................................................................................ 26! 3.3! Housing ................................................................................................................ 29! 3.3.1! Silo ................................................................................................................ 29! 3.3.2! Cage .............................................................................................................. 31! 3.3.3! Mesh Bag Release ......................................................................................... 33! 3.4! Water Quality ....................................................................................................... 33! 3.4.1! Chlorophyll-A ............................................................................................... 33! 3.4.2! Water Discharge Rate ................................................................................... 34! 3.5! Surveys ................................................................................................................. 37! 3.6! Data Collected and Analyzed ............................................................................... 37! 3.7! Recovery Rate and Effort ..................................................................................... 37! 3.8! Analyzing Survival and Growth Rate .................................................................. 38! CHAPTER!4!RESULTS ...................................................................................................... 42! 4.1! Interim Survey Results ......................................................................................... 42! 4.2! Final Study Survey ............................................................................................... 42! 4.3! Recovery Rate and Effort ..................................................................................... 43! 4.4! Survival ................................................................................................................ 45! 4.4.1! Descriptive Statistics ....................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Checklist of Fish and Invertebrates Listed in the CITES Appendices
    JOINTS NATURE \=^ CONSERVATION COMMITTEE Checklist of fish and mvertebrates Usted in the CITES appendices JNCC REPORT (SSN0963-«OStl JOINT NATURE CONSERVATION COMMITTEE Report distribution Report Number: No. 238 Contract Number/JNCC project number: F7 1-12-332 Date received: 9 June 1995 Report tide: Checklist of fish and invertebrates listed in the CITES appendices Contract tide: Revised Checklists of CITES species database Contractor: World Conservation Monitoring Centre 219 Huntingdon Road, Cambridge, CB3 ODL Comments: A further fish and invertebrate edition in the Checklist series begun by NCC in 1979, revised and brought up to date with current CITES listings Restrictions: Distribution: JNCC report collection 2 copies Nature Conservancy Council for England, HQ, Library 1 copy Scottish Natural Heritage, HQ, Library 1 copy Countryside Council for Wales, HQ, Library 1 copy A T Smail, Copyright Libraries Agent, 100 Euston Road, London, NWl 2HQ 5 copies British Library, Legal Deposit Office, Boston Spa, Wetherby, West Yorkshire, LS23 7BQ 1 copy Chadwick-Healey Ltd, Cambridge Place, Cambridge, CB2 INR 1 copy BIOSIS UK, Garforth House, 54 Michlegate, York, YOl ILF 1 copy CITES Management and Scientific Authorities of EC Member States total 30 copies CITES Authorities, UK Dependencies total 13 copies CITES Secretariat 5 copies CITES Animals Committee chairman 1 copy European Commission DG Xl/D/2 1 copy World Conservation Monitoring Centre 20 copies TRAFFIC International 5 copies Animal Quarantine Station, Heathrow 1 copy Department of the Environment (GWD) 5 copies Foreign & Commonwealth Office (ESED) 1 copy HM Customs & Excise 3 copies M Bradley Taylor (ACPO) 1 copy ^\(\\ Joint Nature Conservation Committee Report No.
    [Show full text]
  • Surveys and Monitoring for the Hiawatha National Forest: FY 2018 Report
    Surveys and Monitoring for the Hiawatha National Forest: FY 2018 Report Prepared By: David L. Cuthrell, Michael J. Monfils, Peter J. Badra, Logan M. Rowe, and William MacKinnon Michigan Natural Features Inventory Michigan State University Extension P.O. Box 13036 Lansing, MI 48901-3036 Prepared For: Hiawatha National Forest 18 March 2019 MNFI Report No. 2019-10 Suggested Citation: Cuthrell, David L., Michael J. Monfils, Peter J. Badra, Logan M. Rowe, and William MacKinnon. 2019. Surveys and Monitoring for the Hiawatha National Forest: FY 2018 Report. Michigan Natural Features Inventory, Report No. 2019-10, Lansing, MI. 27 pp. + appendices Copyright 2019 Michigan State University Board of Trustees. MSU Extension programs and ma- terials are open to all without regard to race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, marital status or family status. Cover: Large boulder with walking fern, Hiawatha National Forest, July 2018 (photo by Cuthrell). Table of Contents Niagara Habitat Monitoring – for rare snails, ferns and placement of data loggers (East Unit) .......................... 1 Raptor Nest Checks and Productivity Surveys (East and West Units) ................................................................... 2 Rare Plant Surveys (East and West Units) ............................................................................................................. 4 Dwarf bilberry and Northern blue surveys (West Unit) ……………………………..………………………………………………6 State Wide Bumble Bee Surveys (East
    [Show full text]
  • PETITION to LIST the Western Ridged Mussel
    PETITION TO LIST The Western Ridged Mussel Gonidea angulata (Lea, 1838) AS AN ENDANGERED SPECIES UNDER THE U.S. ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT Photo credit: Xerces Society/Emilie Blevins Submitted by The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation Prepared by Emilie Blevins, Sarina Jepsen, and Sharon Selvaggio August 18, 2020 The Honorable David Bernhardt Secretary, U.S. Department of Interior 1849 C Street, NW Washington, DC 20240 Dear Mr. Bernhardt: The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation hereby formally petitions to list the western ridged mussel (Gonidea angulata) as an endangered species under the Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C. § 1531 et seq. This petition is filed under 5 U.S.C. 553(e) and 50 CFR 424.14(a), which grants interested parties the right to petition for issue of a rule from the Secretary of the Interior. Freshwater mussels perform critical functions in U.S. freshwater ecosystems that contribute to clean water, healthy fisheries, aquatic food webs and biodiversity, and functioning ecosystems. The richness of aquatic life promoted and supported by freshwater mussel beds is analogous to coral reefs, with mussels serving as both structure and habitat for other species, providing and concentrating food, cleaning and clearing water, and enhancing riverbed habitat. The western ridged mussel, a native freshwater mussel species in western North America, once ranged from San Diego County in California to southern British Columbia and east to Idaho. In recent years the species has been lost from 43% of its historic range, and the southern terminus of the species’ distribution has contracted northward approximately 475 miles. Live western ridged mussels were not detected at 46% of the 87 sites where it historically occurred and that have been recently revisited.
    [Show full text]
  • Louisiana's Animal Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN)
    Louisiana's Animal Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN) ‐ Rare, Threatened, and Endangered Animals ‐ 2020 MOLLUSKS Common Name Scientific Name G‐Rank S‐Rank Federal Status State Status Mucket Actinonaias ligamentina G5 S1 Rayed Creekshell Anodontoides radiatus G3 S2 Western Fanshell Cyprogenia aberti G2G3Q SH Butterfly Ellipsaria lineolata G4G5 S1 Elephant‐ear Elliptio crassidens G5 S3 Spike Elliptio dilatata G5 S2S3 Texas Pigtoe Fusconaia askewi G2G3 S3 Ebonyshell Fusconaia ebena G4G5 S3 Round Pearlshell Glebula rotundata G4G5 S4 Pink Mucket Lampsilis abrupta G2 S1 Endangered Endangered Plain Pocketbook Lampsilis cardium G5 S1 Southern Pocketbook Lampsilis ornata G5 S3 Sandbank Pocketbook Lampsilis satura G2 S2 Fatmucket Lampsilis siliquoidea G5 S2 White Heelsplitter Lasmigona complanata G5 S1 Black Sandshell Ligumia recta G4G5 S1 Louisiana Pearlshell Margaritifera hembeli G1 S1 Threatened Threatened Southern Hickorynut Obovaria jacksoniana G2 S1S2 Hickorynut Obovaria olivaria G4 S1 Alabama Hickorynut Obovaria unicolor G3 S1 Mississippi Pigtoe Pleurobema beadleianum G3 S2 Louisiana Pigtoe Pleurobema riddellii G1G2 S1S2 Pyramid Pigtoe Pleurobema rubrum G2G3 S2 Texas Heelsplitter Potamilus amphichaenus G1G2 SH Fat Pocketbook Potamilus capax G2 S1 Endangered Endangered Inflated Heelsplitter Potamilus inflatus G1G2Q S1 Threatened Threatened Ouachita Kidneyshell Ptychobranchus occidentalis G3G4 S1 Rabbitsfoot Quadrula cylindrica G3G4 S1 Threatened Threatened Monkeyface Quadrula metanevra G4 S1 Southern Creekmussel Strophitus subvexus
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Mussel Survey of Clinchport, Clinch River, Virginia: Augmentation Monitoring Site: 2006
    Freshwater Mussel Survey of Clinchport, Clinch River, Virginia: Augmentation Monitoring Site: 2006 By: Nathan L. Eckert, Joe J. Ferraro, Michael J. Pinder, and Brian T. Watson Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries Wildlife Diversity Division October 28th, 2008 Table of Contents Introduction....................................................................................................................... 4 Objective ............................................................................................................................ 5 Study Area ......................................................................................................................... 6 Methods.............................................................................................................................. 6 Results .............................................................................................................................. 10 Semi-quantitative .................................................................................................. 10 Quantitative........................................................................................................... 11 Qualitative............................................................................................................. 12 Incidental............................................................................................................... 12 Discussion........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Atlas of the Freshwater Mussels (Unionidae)
    1 Atlas of the Freshwater Mussels (Unionidae) (Class Bivalvia: Order Unionoida) Recorded at the Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve & State Nature Preserve, Ohio and surrounding watersheds by Robert A. Krebs Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences Cleveland State University Cleveland, Ohio, USA 44115 September 2015 (Revised from 2009) 2 Atlas of the Freshwater Mussels (Unionidae) (Class Bivalvia: Order Unionoida) Recorded at the Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve & State Nature Preserve, Ohio, and surrounding watersheds Acknowledgements I thank Dr. David Klarer for providing the stimulus for this project and Kristin Arend for a thorough review of the present revision. The Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve provided housing and some equipment for local surveys while research support was provided by a Research Experiences for Undergraduates award from NSF (DBI 0243878) to B. Michael Walton, by an NOAA fellowship (NA07NOS4200018), and by an EFFRD award from Cleveland State University. Numerous students were instrumental in different aspects of the surveys: Mark Lyons, Trevor Prescott, Erin Steiner, Cal Borden, Louie Rundo, and John Hook. Specimens were collected under Ohio Scientific Collecting Permits 194 (2006), 141 (2007), and 11-101 (2008). The Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve in Ohio is part of the National Estuarine Research Reserve System (NERRS), established by section 315 of the Coastal Zone Management Act, as amended. Additional information on these preserves and programs is available from the Estuarine Reserves Division, Office for Coastal Management, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U. S. Department of Commerce, 1305 East West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Biological Report Neosho Mucket (Lampsilis Rafinesqueana)
    Species Biological Report Neosho Mucket (Lampsilis rafinesqueana) Cover photo: Dr. Chris Barnhart (Missouri State University) Prepared by: The Neosho Mucket Recovery Team This species biological report informs the Draft Recovery Plan for the Neosho Mucket (Lampsilis rafinesqueana) (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2017). The Species Biological Report is a comprehensive biological status review by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) for the Neosho Mucket and provides an account of species overall viability. A Recovery Implementation Strategy, which provides the expanded narrative for the recovery activities and the implementation schedule, is available at https://www.fws.gov/arkansas-es/. The Recovery Implementation Strategy and Species Biological Report are finalized separately from the Recovery Plan and will be updated on a routine basis. Executive Summary The Neosho Mucket is a freshwater mussel endemic to the Illinois, Neosho, and Verdigris River basins in Arkansas, Kansas, Missouri, and Oklahoma. It is associated with shallow riffles and runs comprising gravel substrate and moderate to swift currents, but prefers near-shore areas or areas out of the main current in Shoal Creek and Illinois River. It does not occur in reservoirs lacking riverine characteristics. The life-history traits and habitat requirements of the Neosho Mucket make it extremely susceptible to environmental change (e.g., droughts, sedimentation, chemical contaminants). Mechanisms leading to the decline of Neosho Mucket range from local (e.g., riparian clearing, chemical contaminants, etc.), to regional influences (e.g., altered flow regimes, channelization, etc.), to global climate change. The synergistic (interaction of two or more components) effects of threats are often complex in aquatic environments, making it difficult to predict changes in mussel and fish host(s) distribution, abundance, and habitat availability that may result from these effects.
    [Show full text]
  • Wavy-Rayed Lampmussel
    Species Status Assessment Class: Bivalvia Family: Unionidae Scientific Name: Lampsilis fasciola Common Name: Wavy-rayed lampmussel Species synopsis: Lampsilis fasciola belongs to the subfamily Ambleminae and the tribe Lampsilini, which includes 17 extant and 6 likely extirpated New York species of the genera Actinonaias, Epioblasma, Lampsilis, Leptodea, Ligumia, Obovaria, Potamilus, Ptychobranchus, Toxolasma, Truncilla, and Villosa (Haag, 2012; Graf and Cummings, 2011). L. fasciola is mainly found in and around riffle areas of clear, hydrologically stable, fast moving water (Watters et al., 2009). Since 1970, L. fasciola has been found in six New York waterbodies. Historically, it has been collected in the Erie, Western Lake Ontario, and Lower Genesee basins (Strayer & Jirka, 1997). L. fasciola no longer considered abundant in any New York location, however they are most commonly found in the Allegheny River and its tributaries (The Nature Conservancy, 2009). With a state rank of “critically imperiled,” L. fasciola is listed as threatened in New York State, although it is secure throughout its range (NatureServe, 2013). In North America, approximately ⅔ to ¾ of native mussel species are extinct, listed as endangered or threatened, or are in need of conservation status (Williams et al. 1993; Stein et al.2000). While population trends in New York are unknown, it is assumed that they too are declining, due to a myriad of environmental stressors. 1 Status a. Current and Legal Protected Status i. Federal ____ __ None_________________________________Candidate?
    [Show full text]
  • The Freshwater Bivalve Mollusca (Unionidae, Sphaeriidae, Corbiculidae) of the Savannah River Plant, South Carolina
    SRQ-NERp·3 The Freshwater Bivalve Mollusca (Unionidae, Sphaeriidae, Corbiculidae) of the Savannah River Plant, South Carolina by Joseph C. Britton and Samuel L. H. Fuller A Publication of the Savannah River Plant National Environmental Research Park Program United States Department of Energy ...---------NOTICE ---------, This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the United States Government. Neither the United States nor the United States Depart­ mentof Energy.nor any of theircontractors, subcontractors,or theiremploy­ ees, makes any warranty. express or implied or assumes any legalliabilityor responsibilityfor the accuracy, completenessor usefulnessofanyinformation, apparatus, product or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. A PUBLICATION OF DOE'S SAVANNAH RIVER PLANT NATIONAL ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH PARK Copies may be obtained from NOVEMBER 1980 Savannah River Ecology Laboratory SRO-NERP-3 THE FRESHWATER BIVALVE MOLLUSCA (UNIONIDAE, SPHAERIIDAE, CORBICULIDAEj OF THE SAVANNAH RIVER PLANT, SOUTH CAROLINA by JOSEPH C. BRITTON Department of Biology Texas Christian University Fort Worth, Texas 76129 and SAMUEL L. H. FULLER Academy of Natural Sciences at Philadelphia Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Prepared Under the Auspices of The Savannah River Ecology Laboratory and Edited by Michael H. Smith and I. Lehr Brisbin, Jr. 1979 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION 1 STUDY AREA " 1 LIST OF BIVALVE MOLLUSKS AT THE SAVANNAH RIVER PLANT............................................ 1 ECOLOGICAL
    [Show full text]
  • Reproductive Biology and Host Requirement Differences
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY AND HOST REQUIREMENT DIFFERENCES AMONG ISOLATED POPULATIONS OF CYPROGENIA ABERTI (CONRAD, 1850) A Thesis Presented to The Graduate College of Southwest Missouri State University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Master of Science, Biology By Nathan L. Eckert August 2003 REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY AND HOST REQUIREMENT DIFFERENCES AMONG ISOLATED POPULATIONS OF CYPROGENIA ABERTI (CONRAD, 1850) Biology Department Southwest Missouri State University, August 2003 Master of Science Nathan L. Eckert ABSTRACT Cyprogenia aberti, the Western fanshell, is a rare and threatened pearly mussel endemic to the Interior Highlands of Eastern North America. Previous genetic analysis suggested that multiple species are present within this taxon. The present study sought phenotypic differences among genetically distinct populations in the upper Arkansas River system (Verdigris and Spring rivers), the St. Francis River, and the Ouachita River. Like other native mussels, the glochidia larvae of Cyprogenia are obligate parasites on particular species of host fish. Transformation success of glochidia was compared among 8 species of Percina and Etheostoma. The percentage of attached glochidia that transformed on individual fish ranged between 0 and 86%. Effective hosts (those that transformed a large proportion of attached glochidia) were always sympatric with the mussel population, and species with narrow geographic range were effective hosts only for sympatric mussel populations. However, two populations of a geographically widespread host species, the logperch, were effective hosts for each mussel population tested. The timing of glochidia and juvenile drop-off appeared to be related to the age or maturity of the glochidia. Glochidia size and shape differed among mussel populations. Conglutinate color, which is determined by the color of undeveloped eggs, varied within and among populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Banisteria, Number 14, 1999 © 1999 by the Virginia Natural History Society
    Banisteria, Number 14, 1999 © 1999 by the Virginia Natural History Society A Survey of Freshwater Mussels in the Middle Fork Holston River, Virginia William F. Henley Richard J. Neves Lora L. Zimmerman Rebecca Winterringer Virginia Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit1 Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Sciences Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Blacksburg, Virginia 24061-0321 INTRODUCTION 1820); littlewing pearlymussel, Pegias fabula (Lea, 1838); flutedshell, Lasmigona costata (Rafinesque, The Middle Fork Holston River (MFHR) in 1820); Tennessee heelsplitter, L. holstonia (Lea, 1838); southwestern Virginia flows in a southwesterly direction Tennessee pigtoe, Fusconaia barnesiana (Lea, 1838), through Wythe, Smyth, and Washington counties to its shiny pigtoe, F. cor (Conrad, 1834); slabside confluence with the South Fork Holston River at South pearlymussel, Lexingtonia dolabelloides (Lea, 1840); Holston Lake (Fig. 1). The river’s watershed is primarily Tennessee clubshell, Pleurobema oviforme (Conrad, limestone bedrock with dissolved CaCO3 concentrations 1834); spike, Elliptio dilatata (Rafinesque, 1820); from 52 mg/l to 350 mg/l, with a mean of 134 mg/l kidneyshell, Ptychobranchus fasciolaris (Rafinesque, (Virginia Department of Environmental Quality [VDEQ] 1820); fluted kidneyshell, P. subtentum (Say, 1825); 1998). Average discharge for the period between 1931 pheasantshell, Actinonaias pectorosa (Conrad, 1834); and 1996 was estimated at 245 cfs, with an estimated mucket, A. ligamentina (Lamarck,1819); purple mean peak flow of 4534 cfs at the USGS gauging station wartyback, Cyclonaias tuberculata (Rafinesque, 1820); at Meadowview, Virginia. The 1997 annual 7-day Cumberland moccasinshell, Medionidus conradicus (Lea, minimum discharge recorded at this gauging station was 1834); rainbow mussel, Villosa iris (Lea, 1829); moun- 63 cfs, and the average monthly summer flow (July tain creekshell, V.
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Mussels of the National Park Service Obed Wild and Scenic River, Tennessee
    Malacological Review, 2017, 45/46: 193-211 FRESHWATER MUSSELS OF THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE OBED WILD AND SCENIC RIVER, TENNESSEE Steven A. Ahlstedt1, Joseph F. Connell2, Steve Bakaletz3, and Mark T. Fagg4 ABSTRACT The Obed River was designated as a Wild and Scenic River (WSR) in 1976 and is a unit of the National Park Service. The river is considered to be among the highest quality in the state of Tennessee supporting a rich ecological diversity. Two federally listed species (one fish and one mussel) occur in the Obed: spotfin chub Cyprinella monacha, and purple bean Villosa perpurpurea. The Obed is a major tributary to the upper Emory River. Historical mussel collections and recent sampling have documented 27 species in the drainage. Freshwater mussel sampling was relegated to the Obed WSR and tributaries to determine species composition, abundance, and whether reproduction and recruitment is occurring to the fauna. Mussel sampling was conducted from 2000-2001 within the boundaries of the WSR at access points throughout the length of the Obed including portions of the upper Emory River, Daddy’s, Clear, and Whites creek. A total of 585 mussels representing nine species were found during the study. The most abundant mussel found was Villosa iris that comprised 55% of the fauna, followed by Lampsilis fasciola 19% and Medionidus conradicus 14%. The federally endangered V. perpurpurea was represented at 3%. Two species, Pleuronaia barnesiana (live) and Lampsilis cardium (fresh dead), were found as single individuals and P. barnesiana is a new distribution record for the Obed. The mussel fauna in the Obed WSR is relatively rare and historically the river may never have had a more diverse fauna because of the biologically non-productive nature of shale and sandstone that characterize streams on the Cumberland Plateau.
    [Show full text]