DOCSLIB.ORG

Upper Esopus Creek MANAGEMENT PLAN

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Upper Esopus Creek MANAGEMENT PLAN Upper Esopus Creek MANAGEMENT PLAN VolUmE I · SUmmary of FindIngS and RecommEndatIonS 1 Cover: Detail from “Winter light” oil on paper, 26” X 48”, © 2009 miChelle Spark. 2 Upper Esopus Creek MANAGEMENT PLAN VolUmE I · SUmmary of FindIngS and RecommEndatIonS Prepared by Cornell Cooperative Extension – Ulster County New York City Department of Environmental Protection U.S. Army Engineer Research Development Center Cover: Detail from “Winter light” oil on paper, 26” X 48”, © 2009 miChelle Spark. January 2007 Preface People and Catskill Mountain streams have had to adjust to each other for several centuries.We live with the beauty of streams while also learning to live with their powerful forces as they convey water and sediment out of the watershed. The streams that have helped carve these mountain valleys have adjusted their form to natural influences such as the regional climate, geology and ecosystem. Human development on the watershed landscape - roads, bridges, houses, and towns - are another influence on the stream’s adjustment to its setting. Likewise, people adjust to the influences of the streams they live along. To sustain viable communities, we need to plan for the natural erosive and flooding forces that come with the steep slopes, melting snow and torrential rains common to the Catskills. This planning process started in 2004 With these goals in mind, the Project Team when a focus group representing diverse went to work on an “assessment” process stream interests met to identify common that would inform recommendations for issues concerning the Upper Esopus Creek improvement in these goal areas. A (defined in this plan as above the Ashokan physical assessment provided a baseline Reservoir). From these meetings, five long- characterization of the Upper Esopus term goal areas were identified, setting Creek corridor and assesses its physical the scope of this Management Plan: and ecologic condition. We have also assessed people’s opinions and needs • Flooding and Erosion about stream management as well as the • Water Quality history of human impacts on the stream. • Aquatic Ecology • Recreation This is not a manual on how to repair the Upper Esopus Creek. Given the constantly • Management Coordination changing nature of streams and how 2 sensitive they are to human intervention, York City Department of Environmental “repair” is not a practical objective. The Protection has committed new funding to site-specific “problems” identified today support Management Plan recommendation are not necessarily the problems that implementation, as detailed below. will be present tomorrow. As we who live and work along this stream know, the The Management Plan recommendations hammering floods of the last three years will be incorporated into Annual Ashokan have shown how dynamic this stream Watershed Stream Management Program is. Instead of looking at the stream as a Action Plans (“Action Plans”). The Action fixed, stationary object, this Management Plans are developed annually by the Project Plan aims to create strategies that deal Team and the Project Advisory Council. The with the stream as a dynamic system. Action Plans integrate the recommendations of all Ashokan Reservoir watershed stream General and specific recommendations management plans into annual work plans. for improving stream management are listed on page 23. Further findings on plan goals Successful implementation of the are detailed in subsequent chapters. (see Management Plan requires a commitment “How to Use This Plan,” p. 5). Some of to funding and stakeholder participation. the recommendations overlap or have some In 2008, New York City Department redundancy as this is a multi-objective of Environmental Protection (“DEP”) planning effort. Also, because this committed a total of $8.15 million dollars Management Plan reflects the collaborative in contracts for staffing an Ashokan process of the Project Advisory Council Watershed Stream Management Program (PAC) used to guide the planning process, and implementation of prioritized we often use the words support, encourage, recommendations for all Stream advocate when discussing many of the Management Plans in the Ashokan recommendations. Many entities will be watershed (including Stony Clove and responsible for the ultimate implemen- Broadstreet Hollow). $2 million dollars of tation of the plan recommendations. that funding has been allocated to a grant- based program for local implementation This final draft of Volume I of the Upper of projects. An additional $2.1 million Esopus Creek Management Plan was is specifically available for stream completed in November, 2008. Since the restoration/stabilization projects. Up to original draft in January 2007 several $400,000 dollars will be available to assist developments have taken place that require streamside landowners with restoring some content change from the original streamside vegetation for stream bank draft. Most notably, the Project Team stability. Additional funding will be has expanded to include Ulster County necessary as well. However, the current Soil and Water Conservation District allocation of funding from the DEP and the (“District”) and the Project Coordinator commitment of the local community can for Cornell Cooperative Extension is help leverage needed grants from federal, Elizabeth Higgins. In addition, New state, and private foundation sources. 3 ACKNOWLeDGeMeNTS The Esopus Creek Project Team would like to appreciate the participation, support and patience of the residents of the Esopus Creek Watershed – particularly streamside residents who have allowed us to access their backyards in completing stream assessments. We also thank you for providing infor- mation through our surveys and various community activities and interviews. Great appreciation is given to the following volunteers and agency staff for their support and generous assistance in developing the Draft Esopus Creek Stream Management Plan. We could not have completed the plan nor developed a collabora- tive effort without their participation. Many of these members assisted the process by serving on the Project Advisory Council and/or on Working Groups. Others contributed their historic photos, time, homes, and skills. We are grateful to the Town of Shandaken and Phoenicia Fish and Game Association for allowing use of their staff and facilities for meetings. We are also grateful to the entire staffs of the New York City Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) Stream Management Program, and Cornell Cooperative Extension of Ulster County who greatly assisted the project with their support. 4 (* Indicates Project Jenn Greiser Catskill Mountain PROJECT TEAM Advisory Council New York City DEP Stream Railroad President Members) Management Program Ed Pine Cornell Cooperative Jack Issacs* Ulster County EXtension of Ulster Sam Adams New York State DEC Region 3 Highways & Bridges County Olive National Habitat Protection Manager Beth Reichheld* Jeremy E. Magliaro, Heritage Society Harry Jameson* New York City DEP Stream Project Coordinator Barry Baldigo Town Tinker Tube Owner & Management Program Michael C. Courtney, United States Geologi- Chairman, Catskill Lydia Reidy* Community Educator cal Survey Fisheries Mountain Railroad Executive Director, Sarah C. Tarallo, Christine Baltz* Keith Johnson* Cornell Cooperative Intern Phoenicia Rotary, Broad- Superintendent, Town of Extension of Ulster County street Hollow Landowner Shandaken Highway Pat Rudge* U.S. Army Engineer Tom Baudanza Chester Karwatowski* Esopus Creek Landowner / Research and New York City Department President - Ashokan-Pepacton former NYS Park Ranger Development of Environmental Chapter, Trout Unlimited Keith Savoury Center – Protection (DEP) Fisheries Elisabeth Kolb New York State Department Environmental Aaron Bennett * New York State Department of of Transportation, Region 8 Laboratory Catskill Center for Transportation, Region 8 Art Snyder Conservation and Development Chris Kupec Ulster County Emergency J. Craig Fischenich, The Blank Family Streamside Landowner Management Director Ph.D. P.E. Phoenicia Black Bear Amanda LaValle* Rob Stanley Campground SUNY Ulster County Town of Shandaken New York City Helen Budrock * Community College Board Member Department of Catskill Center for Berndt Leifeld* Flo Stanley Environmental Conservation and Development Town of Olive Supervisor Town of Shandaken Protection Gary Cappella * Mark Loete Highway Department Dan Davis, Ulster County Soil and Photographer / Trout Unlimited Michelle Spark* Geologist/ Water District Laurie Machung Esopus Creek Landowner Project Manager Kathy Cappella New York City DEP Wetlands Dan Spencer* USDA Natural Resource Mike Malloy Esopus Creek Landowner Conservation Service (NRCS) Former Town of Ira Stern Ed Cleveland Shandaken Zoning New York City DEP Lands Whitewater Enthusiast Enforcement Officer and Community Planning Virginia Craft* Matt Maraglio Thomas Story* Ulster County Depart- Greene County Soil & Water New York State Department of ment of Planning Conservation District Transportation Region 8 Bob Cross Jr.* Dakin Morehouse Jon Tuscanes Town of Shandaken Supervisor Catskill Mountain Railroad New York City DEP, David Fairman Glenn Miller* GIS Specialist Consensus Building Institute Town of Shandaken, Zoning Rene VanSchaack Christina Falk Enforcement Officer Greene County Soil & Water New York City DEP Wetlands Ros McIntosh* Conservation District Mark E. Farrari Zen Environmental Stud- Ted Wohnsiedler NYS Emergency ies Institute (ZESI) SUNY Ulster
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rartioter Vol
    rartioter Vol. XII, No. 1 WINTER 1 9 7 9 BLACK DOME IN 1924 The Catskill Mountains have been known to white men for three hundred years and their valleys have been settled more than a cen- tury. It would seem as if all their summits ought by this time to be easily accessible by well known trails. Yet there are a dozen or more of the higher ones, above 3500 feet, which have no trails to their summits and which are climbed only by the exploring hiker, or perhaps a bear hunter in winter. I recently found another trackless peak, Black Dome, just under 4000 feet--3990 according to the Durham sheet of the United States Geological Survey--on a week-end climb in the northern Catskills. There is no trail over it, and the only paths that reach its flanks are faded out logging roads in the valleys north and south, attain- ing heights 1500 feet below its highest point. Black Dome is the central and highest of the three peaks that make up the Blackhead Mountains, running east and west, Black Head being the easternmost, then Black Dome and the last Thomas Cole. The other two are about fifty feet lower than the Dome. South of them is the valley of the East Kill, north that of Batavia Kill. North of Black Head runs a long ridge to Acra Point, then turning west to Windham High Peak. South this ridge runs through North Mountain and Stoppel Mountain to Kaaterskill Clove. Black Head is accessible by a good trail.
    [Show full text]
  • Ashokan Reservoir: Stop the Mud Fact Sheet
    Ashokan Reservoir: Stop the mud Fact Sheet NYC is dumping billions of gallons of muddy water into the Lower Esopus The New York City Department of Environmental Protection is at it again, dumping millions of gallons each day of turbid water from the Ashokan Reservoir into the Lower Esopus Creek. High volume, turbid releases, such as those following the 2020 Christmas storm, have left the Lower Esopus Creek a muddy mess. These releases have such a negative impact that the Lower Esopus Creek has been placed on the New York State List of Impaired Waters for excessive silt and sediment. Why is this happening? The Esopus Creek is dammed to create the Ashokan Reservoir, one of the most important parts of New York City’s unfiltered drinking water supply, which serves over 9.5 million people in New York City and the Hudson Valley. Erosion from severe storms – which will become more common as the climate changes – causes excessive turbidity in the reservoir. One of the ways New York City manages this challenge is to dump high volumes of muddy water from the reservoir into the Lower Esopus Creek, which flows 32 miles to the Hudson River. These releases are the least ​ expensive way for the DEP to preserve the quality of NYC drinking water. However, this “solution” only shifts the costs and consequences onto the farmers, businesses and residents along the Lower Esopus from these releases. What is the impact? The turbid water severely affects water quality, wildlife habitat, recreation, and quality of life throughout seven Ulster County communities along the Lower Esopus.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Flood Analysis Hamlets of Shandaken and Allaben Ulster County, New York November 2017
    Local Flood Analysis Hamlets of Shandaken and Allaben Ulster County, New York November 2017 Local Flood Analysis Hamlets of Shandaken and Allaben Ulster County, New York November 2017 Prepared for the Town of Shandaken with funding provided by the Ashokan Watershed Stream Management Program through contract with the New York City Department of Environmental Protection Prepared for: Prepared by: Town of Shandaken MILONE & MACBROOM, INC. P.O. Box 134 231 Main Street, Suite 102 MMI #4615-18-06 7209 Route 28 New Paltz, New York 12561 Shandaken, New York 12480 (845) 633-8153 www.mminc.com Copyright 2017 Milone & MacBroom, Inc. NOVEMBER 2017 Local Flood Analysis TC-i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ ES-i 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project Background ...................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Study Area .................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Community Involvement.............................................................................................. 3 1.4 Nomenclature .............................................................................................................. 3 2.0 WATERSHED INFORMATION ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 Waterfowl Count Report
    New York State Waterfowl Count – 2008 January 12, 2008 Ulster County Narrative Page 1 of 8 Sixteen observers in five field parties participated in the Ulster County segment of the annual New York State Winter Waterfowl Count, recording a total of 17 species and 6,890 individuals within the county on Saturday, 12 January 2008. This represents a record high species count, exceeding last year's diversity by three species, and is just 204 individuals short of our record high total set in 2006. Field observers noted fast moving water, and essentially frozen ponds, lakes, and marshes throughout the county. Stone Ridge Pond on Mill Dam Road was the exception, and continues to contribute a large number of individuals and a few unusual species to the composite, hosting American Wigeon, Ring-necked Duck, and 1,061 individuals this year. The Hudson River, Ashokan Reservoir, lower Esopus Creek in Saugerties, and agricultural fields surrounding Wallkill prison accounted for the majority of the balance of the count. Weather conditions were quite favorable for this time of the year, especially in comparison to the rain and wide- spread fog of last year, or the sub-freezing temperatures typical of a mid-January count. A very dense fog did persist over the Hudson River early morning, requiring some minor route changes to allow for early visits to inland sites while delaying surveys of the Hudson to later in the day. Temperatures started out just below freezing, then warmed to a very comfortable mid-40's (F) by afternoon. Winds were calm for the most part, with the exception of a cold NW gale sweeping across partially frozen Ashokan Reservoir, making for very choppy waters in the lower basin and difficult viewing conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Ashokan Watershed Adventure Guide
    ASHOKAN WATERSHED ADVENTURE GUIDE A Self-Guided Tour of the Ashokan Landscape for All Ages #AshokanWatershedAdventure AWSMP Ashokan Watershed Stream Management Program Ashokan Watershed Stream Management Program The Ashokan Watershed Adventure is sponsored by: AWSMP Ashokan Watershed Stream Management Program Ashokan Watershed Stream Management Program Cornell Cooperative Extension Ulster County AWSMP Ashokan Watershed Stream Management Program About the Ashokan Watershed Adventure The Ashokan Watershed Adventure is a self-guided tour of the AshokanAshokan landscape Watershed for all ages. Adventurers explore the Ashokan Reservoir watershed at theirSt rowneam Managementpace and earn Program prizes based on the number of Adventure Stops visited. From the humble headwaters of the Stony Clove Creek to the shores of the mighty Ashokan Reservoir, Adventurers will experience the landscape like never before. Adventure Stops have been thoughtfully curated by Ashokan Watershed Stream Management Program (AWSMP) staff to highlight some of the most interesting and beautiful places in the watershed. Grab your friends and family or head out on your very own Ashokan Watershed Adventure! How it works Pre-adventure planning There are 11 Ashokan Watershed Adventure Stops. Visit as As with any adventure into the wild lands of the Catskill many as you can to earn a prize. Adventure stops can be Mountains, planning is a very important part of having a fun visited in any order. Each stop has a chapter in the Adventure and safe experience. Guide that includes the site name and location, geographic coordinates, directions and parking instructions, safety guide- 3Cell phone service is limited to non-existent. We lines, and an educational message to inform Adventurers recommend downloading a map of the area to your phone about the unique aspects of the site.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Public Comment on Draft Trout Stream Management Plan
    Assessment of public comments on draft New York State Trout Stream Management Plan OCTOBER 27, 2020 Andrew M. Cuomo, Governor | Basil Seggos, Commissioner A draft of the Fisheries Management Plan for Inland Trout Streams in New York State (Plan) was released for public review on May 26, 2020 with the comment period extending through June 25, 2020. Public comment was solicited through a variety of avenues including: • a posting of the statewide public comment period in the Environmental Notice Bulletin (ENB), • a DEC news release distributed statewide, • an announcement distributed to all e-mail addresses provided by participants at the 2017 and 2019 public meetings on trout stream management described on page 11 of the Plan [353 recipients, 181 unique opens (58%)], and • an announcement distributed to all subscribers to the DEC Delivers Freshwater Fishing and Boating Group [138,122 recipients, 34,944 unique opens (26%)]. A total of 489 public comments were received through e-mail or letters (Appendix A, numbered 1-277 and 300-511). 471 of these comments conveyed specific concerns, recommendations or endorsements; the other 18 comments were general statements or pertained to issues outside the scope of the plan. General themes to recurring comments were identified (22 total themes), and responses to these are included below. These themes only embrace recommendations or comments of concern. Comments that represent favorable and supportive views are not included in this assessment. Duplicate comment source numbers associated with a numbered theme reflect comments on subtopics within the general theme. Theme #1 The statewide catch and release (artificial lures only) season proposed to run from October 16 through March 31 poses a risk to the sustainability of wild trout populations and the quality of the fisheries they support that is either wholly unacceptable or of great concern, particularly in some areas of the state; notably Delaware/Catskill waters.
    [Show full text]
  • Where's Black Creek???
    Black Creek??? Where’s Black Creek??? by Ralph J. Ferrusi s a life-long resident of the mid-Hudson Valley, I’ve spent a Alot of time Boating on the Hudson (and Beyond...), hiking, biking, canoeing, skiing, cross-country skiing, working, tour- guiding, wine-tasting; you get the picture. I’ve always been aware of the Hudson’s many creeks—the Wappingers and Fishkill Creeks have become my “home creeks”—but to me the Esopus and the Rondout have always been the Big Guns, each starting high up in the Catskills, fattening out to reservoirs, and ultimately making a grand entrance into the Hudson. Winnisook Lake, in a 2,660 foot saddle west of 4,180-foot Slide Mountain, the highest peak in the Catskills, is the source of the 65.4-mile-long Esopus. First heading north, then swinging around to the southeast, it becomes the Ashokan Reservoir. It then heads east and scootches around Kingston, where it turns due north to Saugerties, crosses under 9W/32, 44 June 2017 Find Us On Facebook at Boating On The Hudson boatingonthehudson.com June 2017 45 stupid to attempt to deal with it. Many of these are natural on a map it looks to be somewhere in a wetland south of New obstacles, tipped off by deep, narrow gorges, and many are Paltz Road, east of Pancake Hollow Road, and west of Illinois dams. Some dams are relatively low: for example, the Rondout Mountain Park (got that???). Creek dam is not very tall, but broad. Others are pretty big, We typically put in at New Paltz Road, and head north, with even huge: the Fishkill Creek has several big dams, the dam in the fairly mild current.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimates of Natural Streamflow at Two Streamgages on the Esopus Creek, New York, Water Years 1932 to 2012
    Prepared in cooperation with the New York City Department of Environmental Protection Estimates of Natural Streamflow at Two Streamgages on the Esopus Creek, New York, Water Years 1932 to 2012 Scientific Investigations Report 2015–5050 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover. The West Basin of Ashokan Reservoir at sunset. Photograph by Elizabeth Nystrom, 2013. Estimates of Natural Streamflow at Two Streamgages on the Esopus Creek, New York, Water Years 1932 to 2012 By Douglas A. Burns and Christopher L. Gazoorian Prepared in cooperation with the New York City Department of Environmental Protection Scientific Investigations Report 2015–5050 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2015 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod/. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner. Suggested citation: Burns, D.A., and Gazoorian, C.L., 2015, Estimates of natural streamflow at two streamgages on the Esopus Creek, New York, water years 1932–2012: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • NY Excluding Long Island 2017
    DISCONTINUED SURFACE-WATER DISCHARGE OR STAGE-ONLY STATIONS The following continuous-record surface-water discharge or stage-only stations (gaging stations) in eastern New York excluding Long Island have been discontinued. Daily streamflow or stage records were collected and published for the period of record, expressed in water years, shown for each station. Those stations with an asterisk (*) before the station number are currently operated as crest-stage partial-record station and those with a double asterisk (**) after the station name had revisions published after the site was discontinued. Those stations with a (‡) following the Period of Record have no winter record. [Letters after station name designate type of data collected: (d) discharge, (e) elevation, (g) gage height] Period of Station Drainage record Station name number area (mi2) (water years) HOUSATONIC RIVER BASIN Tenmile River near Wassaic, NY (d) 01199420 120 1959-61 Swamp River near Dover Plains, NY (d) 01199490 46.6 1961-68 Tenmile River at Dover Plains, NY (d) 01199500 189 1901-04 BLIND BROOK BASIN Blind Brook at Rye, NY (d) 01300000 8.86 1944-89 BEAVER SWAMP BROOK BASIN Beaver Swamp Brook at Mamaroneck, NY (d) 01300500 4.42 1944-89 MAMARONECK RIVER BASIN Mamaroneck River at Mamaroneck, NY (d) 01301000 23.1 1944-89 BRONX RIVER BASIN Bronx River at Bronxville, NY (d) 01302000 26.5 1944-89 HUDSON RIVER BASIN Opalescent River near Tahawus, NY (d) 01311900 9.02 1921-23 Fishing Brook (County Line Flow Outlet) near Newcomb, NY (d) 0131199050 25.2 2007-10 Arbutus Pond Outlet
    [Show full text]
  • Notice for the Community in the Vicinity of Jerome Ave and Gunhill
    Vincent Sapienza Commissioner FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: December 19, 2018 CONTACT: [email protected], (845) 334-7868 No. 111 DEP TO WORK WITH U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY TO STUDY SUSPECTED LEAK FROM THE CATSKILL AQUEDUCT Multi-year study will focus on pressure tunnel that carries water deep below the Rondout Valley Historic photos of the Rondout Pressure Tunnel can be found by clicking here The New York City Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) today announced that it will work with the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) on a multi-year study to examine suspected leaks from a portion of the Catskill Aqueduct that runs several hundred feet below the Rondout Creek in Ulster County. DEP has been gathering information on this portion of the aqueduct, known as the Rondout Pressure Tunnel, for several years. In 2016, experts used a remote-operate vehicle to view the inside of the pressure tunnel for the first time since it was built more than a century ago. The vehicle used high-definition video cameras, acoustic equipment and other instruments to pinpoint several leaks in the tunnel. Scientific data collected by USGS will supplement the remote-operated vehicle’s inspection of the tunnel, giving DEP a clearer picture of where water is traveling after it escapes the aqueduct. At this time, DEP knows that a significant portion of the water comes to the surface and moves overland into the Rondout Creek in High Falls. USGS will begin its work by meeting individually with landowners in High Falls over the next several months. Scientists from USGS will seek permission to install monitoring instruments in existing groundwater wells, and potentially to install new monitoring wells in that portion of the valley.
    [Show full text]
  • New York City's Water Story
    New York City’s Water Story: From Mountain Top to Tap SCHOHARIE COUNTY Schoharie Reservoir 1,130 FEET Delaware Watershed Gilboa Catskill Watershed Stamford The water we use today is the same water that fell as C rain when dinosaurs roamed a D t Prattsville Siuslaw s DELAWARE COUNTY West Branch Delaware e k l i the earth. In its endless a l Windham l w a W r cycle, water is the only e a t W e GREENE COUNTY rs Schoharie Creek substance that naturally a h te e r d Grand Gorge sh exists as a solid, e d liquid or gas. Delhi Lenox Roxbury East Branch Delaware Hunter Tannersville Andes Walton HUNTER MOUNTAIN Water’s journey from 4,040 FEET mountain top to tap begins Margaretville Shandaken Tunnel when rain and snow fall on COLUMBIA COUNTY watersheds, the areas Massachusetts of land that catch, absorb, Downsville Phoenicia and carry water downhill to gently and swiftly Deposit Pepacton Woodstock flowing streams. Cannonsville Reservoir Reservoir 1,150 FEET 1,280 FEET Esopus Creek SLIDE MOUNTAIN Boiceville West Delaware Tunnel East Delaware Tunnel 4,180 FEET Streams provide life-cycle Neversink Frost Valley needs for fish and other RIver aquatic organisms. Oxygen is Ashokan Rondout trapped in the fresh water as Creek Reservoir Claryville Olivebridge 590 FEET Kingston it tumbles over rocks into deep pools. Overhanging tree branches keep water r C e A v cool as fresh water T i Grahamsville S K R DUTCHESS COUNTY continues its journey. IL L n Neversink A Neversink Reservoir Tunnel Q o s 1,440 FEET U s E d Liberty Rondout Reservoir d Water is naturally filtered D u u U 840 FEET U C C H H T by the soil and tree roots in T dense forests as it travels toward reservoirs.
    [Show full text]
  • Esopus Creek Tubing
    Tubing the Esopus Creek Located in the heart of the Catskill Mountains is a five mile stretch of river that has become one of the most popular tubing courses around. People come from all over to ride the rapids and drift with the currents of the Esopus Creek. The Esopus Creek is located in the Ulster County section of the Catskill Mountains. From its source high on Slide Mountain, it flows 26 miles to the Ashokan Reservoir. As a link in the New York City water system, the Esopus receives a huge flow of water through a tunnel from the bottom of the Schoharie Reservoir. This 50-60 degree water then crashes down stream over a boulder strewn bottom creating excellent white water conditions for tube runs. Your transport down this creek is nothing more than the soft inner tube of a truck tire. It's a giant black rubber donut with a wooden board lashed with nylon rope in the hole for a seat. Cleverly fashioned from that rope is a pair of handles that you will need to hang on for dear life. There are two tubing courses to choose from. The five mile Upper Course, which begins at the water release point on the creek known as the portal, takes 2 hours to complete. This course is recommended for adults since it is much more challenging due to larger, faster and more frequent rapids. The four mile Lower Course, which is recommended for children and families, takes 1 hour and 45 minutes to complete. While the water on this course has a swift current, the rapids are smaller and less frequent.
    [Show full text]