Hunting & Fishing Brochure
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Genesee Valley Greenway State Park Management Plan Existing
Genesee Valley Greenway State Park Management Plan Part 2 – Existing Conditions and Background Information Part 2 Existing Conditions and Background Information Page 45 Genesee Valley Greenway State Park Management Plan Part 2 – Existing Conditions and Background Information Existing Conditions Physical Resources Bedrock Geology From Rochester heading south to Cuba and Hinsdale Silurian Akron Dolostone, Cobleskill Limestone and Salina Group Akron dolostone Camillus Shale Vernon Formation Devonian Onondaga Limestone and Tri-states Group Onondaga Limestone Hamilton Group Marcellus Formation Skaneatleles Formation Ludlowville Formation Sonyea Group Cashaqua Shale Genesee Group and Tully Limestone West River Shale West Falls Group Lower Beers Hill West Hill Formation Nunda Formation Java Group Hanover Shale Canadaway Group Machias Formation Conneaut Group Ellicot Formation Page 47 Genesee Valley Greenway State Park Management Plan Part 2 – Existing Conditions and Background Information Soils As much of the Greenway follows the route of the Rochester Branch of the Pennsylvania Railroad, major expanses of the Greenway Trail are covered with a layer of cinder and/or turf and other man-made fill. In general, the soils underneath the Greenway tend to be gravelly or silty clay loam. The entire trail is fairly level, with the majority of slopes being less than five percent. A complete, narrative description of the soils can be found in Appendix F Natural Resources Flora A complete biological inventory of Greenway property is not presently available (October 2013). However, SUNY Geneseo botany students began to inventory flora within sections of the corridor. The New York State Natural Heritage Program has targeted the GVG for a Natural Heritage inventory in 2014. -
Genesee Valley Glacial and Postglacial Geology from 50000
Genesee Valley Glacial and Postglacial Geology from 50,000 Years Ago to the Present: A Selective Annotated Review Richard A. Young, Department of Geological Sciences, SUNY, Geneseo, NY 14454 Introduction The global chronology for The Pleistocene Epoch, or “ice age,” has been significantly revised during the last three decades (Alley and Clark, 1999) as a result of the extended and more accurate data provided by deep sea drilling projects, ice core studies from Greenland and Antarctica (Andersen et al. 2006; Svensson et al. 2008), oxygen isotope studies of marine sediments, and climatic proxy data from lake cores, peat bogs, and cave stalactites. These new data have improved our ability to match the Earth’s Milankovitch orbital cycles to the improved ice core and radiometric chronologies (ages based on radiocarbon, U-Th, U-Pb). However, the Milankovitch theory has recently been the subject of renewed controversy, and not all cyclical climatic phenomena are directly reconcilable with Milankovitch’s original ideas (Ridgwell et al., 1999; Ruddiman, 2006). Overall, it is evident that there must have been as many as 20 or more glacial cycles in the last 2.5 million years, not all of which necessarily resulted in the expansion of large ice sheets as far south as the United States-Canadian border. The International Union of Geological Sciences recently adopted a change for the Pliocene-Pleistocene boundary, extending the beginning of the Pleistocene Epoch back from 1.8 to 2.588 million years Before Present (BP). The average length of the most recent glacial- interglacial cycles (also known as “Stages”) is on the order of 100,000 years, with 10,000 to 15,000 years being the approximate length of the interglacial warm episodes between the longer cold cycles (also known as cold stadials and warm interstadials). -
Habitat Management Plan for Honeoye Creek Wildlife Management Area 2017 ‐ 2026
Habitat Management Plan for Honeoye Creek Wildlife Management Area 2017 ‐ 2026 Photo: Mike Palermo Division of Fish and Wildlife Bureau of Wildlife 6274 East Avon‐Lima Road, Avon, New York 14414 October 16, 2017 Prepared by: Michael Palermo, Biologist I (Wildlife) Emily Bonk, Forester 1 John Mahoney, Forestry Technician 1 Young Forest Initiative Dana Hilderbrant, Fish & Wildlife Technician 3 Honeoye Creek WMA Management Heidi Kennedy, Biologist 1 (Wildlife) Land Management & Habitat Conservation Team Reviewed and approved by: !(}/! 7/~d/7 Michael Wasilco, Regional Wildlife Manager Date Bureaµ of Wildlife 1 7 James F. Farquh III, Chief Date Bureau of Wildlife ny Wilkinson, Director vision of Fish and Wildlife Financial support for development ofthis Habitat Management Plan was provided by the Federal Aid in Wildlife and Sport Fish Restoration Program and non-federal funds administered by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation including Habitat & Access Stamp funds. llPage TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................................... 3 I. BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION................................................................................................ 4 PURPOSE OF HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLANS ............................................................................ 4 WMA OVERVIEW ...................................................................................................................... 5 LANDSCAPE -
Groundwater Contour Plan 13 December 1990
File on «>nnna X Vn» -'••=-. * Nn , SiteNamfl ^>t>V. ~Q ^flC^^.rr-" ->r».---! Site No. 0X6(3 // *- •/...• - County, L,\s,\,.rh/\ _ - •• - •• Town U/JirA '•• • •• "•• tollable £____„Yes - No Fiie Mama ' r<>f> *sf?k ^ 8J6o (I. (<t1? -/I- ./y. Scanned&fiDCfc p-&~~ WKpf**%\fi&&> M &:A ®:S IMlH:te^m m •tox kfc-J £V afl* * ST* *^J^*sa*^r ad ^J^p^^'^T^^'^^^F^^ •WS*.«Hrt .->>^-, ^y... --^,-^P->-,-^..^^Ov*.- ..w-^ J^'>."KMV-,^^ ^;^ ! : " *•*>•" - - '^-—-'•••--*'• ' FINAL REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION WORK PLAN ENARC-O MACHINE PRODUCTS, INC. NYSDEC REGISTRY SITE NO. 8-26-011 LIMA, NEW YORK Prepared for: Kaddis Manufacturing Corp. 1100 Beahan Road Rochester, New York By: H&A of New York 189 N. Water Street Rochester, New York JAN 7/994 "SSr File No. 70372-40 December 1993 A9A Gaotachnlcil Englno«r« A Letter of Transmittal Environmontal Consultants To NYSDEC - Bureau of Western Remedial"Action 4 January 1994 50 Wolf Road Fil°Number 70372-40 Albany, New York 12233-7010 Subiect Enarc-O Machine Attention David Chiusano Site #826011 Copies Date Descri ption 6 12/30/93 Final RI Work Plan Enarc-O Machine Corp. Revised pages 23, 24 and Table 2 Remarks In accordance with our phone conversation and your verbal approval of the work plan, enclosed are copies as indicated above. The revised pages 23, 24 and Table 2 are for you to insert in the work plan copy we sent you last week. The six full copies already have the revisions on these pages that you had requested. Distribution of the plan with your requested revisions has been done as shown below. -
Town of Seneca
TOWN OF BRISTOL Inventory of Land Use and Land Cover Prepared for: Ontario County Water Resources Council 20 Ontario Street, 3rd Floor Canandaigua, New York 14424 and Town of Bristol 6740 County Road 32 Canandaigua, New York 14424 Prepared by: Dr. Bruce Gilman Department of Environmental Conservation and Horticulture Finger Lakes Community College 3325 Marvin Sands Drive Canandaigua, New York 14424-8395 2020 Cover image: Ground level view of a perched swamp white oak forest community (S1S2) surrounding a shrub swamp that was discovered and documented on Johnson Hill north of Dugway Road. This forest community type is rare statewide and extremely rare locally, and harbors a unique assemblage of uncommon plant species. (Image by the Bruce Gilman). Acknowledgments: For over a decade, the Ontario County Planning Department has supported a working partnership between local towns and the Department of Environmental Conservation and Horticulture at Finger Lakes Community College that involves field research, ground truthing and digital mapping of natural land cover and cultural land use patterns. Previous studies have been completed for the Canandaigua Lake watershed, the southern Honeoye Valley, the Honeoye Lake watershed, the complete Towns of Canandaigua, Gorham, Richmond and Victor, and the woodlots, wetlands and riparian corridors in the Towns of Seneca, Phelps and Geneva. This report summarizes the latest land use/land cover study conducted in the Town of Bristol. The final report would not have been completed without the vital assistance of Terry Saxby of the Ontario County Planning Department. He is gratefully thanked for his assistance with landowner information, his patience as the fieldwork was slowly completed, and his noteworthy help transcribing the field maps to geographic information system (GIS) shape files. -
NY State Highway Bridge Data: August 31, 2021
NY State Highway Bridge Data: August 31, 2021 Allegany County Year Date BIN Built or of Last Poor Region County Municipality Location Feature Carried Feature Crossed Owner Replaced Inspectio Status n 06 Allegany Alfred (Town) 1016280 1.1 MI S JCT SR21 & SR244 21 21 61011075 EAST VALLEY CREEK NYSDOT 2004 09/08/2020 N 06 Allegany Alfred (Town) 1016300 0.1 MI S JCT RTS 21 & 244 21 21 61011088 CANACADEA CREEK NYSDOT 1986 04/07/2021 N 06 Allegany Alfred (Town) 1016270 3.0 MI N JCT 417 & 21 21 21 61011030 RAILROAD BROOK NYSDOT 1986 07/02/2019 N 06 Allegany Alfred (Town) 3357650 4.2 MI SW OF ALFRED CR12 ELM VAL RD TRIB ELM VALLEY C 30 - County 1973 08/12/2020 N 06 Allegany Alfred (Town) 2254600 1.7 MI E OF ALFRED EAST VALLEY ROAD EAST VALLEY CREEK 40 - Town 1970 08/12/2020 Y 06 Allegany Alfred (Town) 2213730 1.1 MI S ALFRED STATION EAST VALLEY ROAD EAST VALLEY CREEK 40 - Town 1970 03/31/2020 N 06 Allegany Alfred (Town) 2213720 3.1 MI NE OF ANDOVER EAST VALLEY ROAD EAST VALLEY CREEK 40 - Town 1970 07/29/2020 N 06 Allegany Alfred (Town) 3330730 2.6 MI N.W. OF ALFRED MC HENRY ROAD MC HENRY CREEK 30 - County 1980 07/17/2019 N 06 Allegany Alfred (Town) 2213710 1.0 MI S ALFRED STATION PLEASANT VALLEY R PLEASANT VALLEY C 40 - Town 1984 03/26/2020 N 06 Allegany Alfred (Village) 1049720 IN ALFRED 960B960B61011003 TRB CANACADEA CRK NYSDOT 1976 04/03/2020 N 06 Allegany Alfred (Village) 2255080 IN ALFRED ELM STREET TRB CANACADEA CRK 41 - Village 1976 05/13/2021 Y 06 Allegany Alfred (Village) 2329770 IN ALFRED PINE STREET CANACADEA CREEK 40 - Town 1961 05/13/2021 -
Categorization of New York State Trout Stream Reaches
Categorization of New York State Trout Stream Reaches NOVEMBER 2020 Andrew M. Cuomo, Governor | Basil Seggos, Commissioner Total Management # of Stream County Reach Description Category Miles Trout Region 8 From Canaseraga Road bridge (County Sugar Creek Livingston Route 17) upstream to Dannack Hill Road Stocked bridge Region 9 From 0.5 miles downstream of Cemetery Bear Lake Chautauqua Road upstream to 0.5 miles upstream of Mill Stocked Outlet Road From confluence with Great Valley Creek upstream to W. Fancy Tract Road AND from Beaver Meadow Cattaraugus Route 240 (W. Valley Road) upstream to 100 Stocked Creek yards upstream of Beaver Meadows Road (County Route 75) From the most downstream County Route 16 Black Creek Allegany crossing upstream to the second County Stocked Route 16 crossing. From 0.5 miles downstream of confluence Bone Run Cattaraugus with Phillips Brook upstream to confluence Stocked with Little Bone Run From 0.5 miles downstream of Factory Road Buffalo River Wyoming upstream to 0.5 miles upstream of Sanders Stocked Hill Road California From County Route 33 upstream to 0.5 miles Allegany Stocked Hollow Brook upstream of confluence with Kansas Hollow From the Allegany/Steuben County line Canacadea Allegany upstream to Hamilton Hill Road in Alfred Stocked Creek Station From confluence with Unnamed Tributary 0.55 miles upstream of Arkright Falls Canadaway Chautauqua upstream to confluence with Unnamed Stocked Creek Tributary 700 yards upstream of Griswold Road Allegany/ Canaseraga From the State Route 436 bridge upstream Livingston/ -
Central Library of Rochester and Monroe County · Historic Serials Collection
Central Library of Rochester and Monroe County · Historic Serials Collection : Central Library of Rochester and Monroe County · Historic Serials Collection Rochester Public Library Reference Book Not For Circulation Form la Central Library of Rochester and Monroe County · Historic Serials Collection ? llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll 3 9077 03099649 3 Central Library of Rochester and Monroe County · Historic Serials Collection PROCEEDINGS OF THE Rochester Academy of Science Central Library of Rochester and Monroe County · Historic Serials Collection PROCEEDINGS u OF THE Rochester Academy of Science hi VOLUME 6 October, 1919, to October, 1929 Rochester, n. y. PUBLISHED BY THE SOCIETY 1929 Central Library of Rochester and Monroe County · Historic Serials Collection OFFICERS OF THE ACADEMY 1920-1929 L. English, 1920-1921. F. W. C. Meyer, 1922-1925. President, Cogswell Bentley, 1926-1927. (GeorgeWilliam H. Boardman, 1928-1929. Florus R. Baxter, 1920. J. L. Roseboom, 1921. First Vice-president, . John R. Murlin, 1922-1924. H. H. Covell, 1925-1927. |L. E. Jewell, 1928-1929. 'J. L. Roseboom, 1920. John R. Murlin, 1921. H. H. Covell, 1922-1924. Second Vice-president, A. C. Hawkins, 1925-1926. Arthur C. Parker, 1927. C. Messerschmidt, 1928-1929. Secretary, Milroy N. Stewart, 1920-1929. Treasurer, George Wendt, 1920-1929. Librarian, Alice H. Brown, 1920-1929. Corresponding Secretary, William D. Merrell, 1920-1921. COUNCILLORS Elective Florence Beckwith, 1920-1929. William H. Boardman, 1923-1927. Herman' L. Fairchild, 1920-1929. Alfred C. Hawkins, 1923-1925. Warren A. Matthews, 1920-1927. F. W. C. Meyer, 1926-1929. Milton S. Baxter, 1920-1922. William D. Merrell, 1926-1928. Charles C. Zoller, 1920-1922. Arthur C. -
2017 Draft Allegany Unit State Forests
Allegany County UNIT MANAGEMENT PLAN DRAFT Towns of Alfred, Allen, Almond, Amity, Angelica, Belfast, Birdsall, Burns, Caneadea, Centerville, Friendship, Granger, Grove, New Hudson, Rushford, Ward, Wellsville, West Almond, and Willing County of Allegany January, 2016 DIVISION OF LANDS AND FORESTS Bureau of State Land Management, Region 9 2524 County Route 2A Almond, NY 14804 www.dec.ny.gov Allegany County Unit Management Plan A planning unit consisting of 23 State Forests in Allegany County January 2016 Prepared by the Allegany Unit Management Planning Team: Nathaniel Tucker, Senior Forester Chelsea Sheridan, Research Technician Jonathan Cleveland, Forester Trainee I David Paradowski, Regional Forester Justin Thaine, Forest Ranger Robert Stanton, Land Surveyor Julie Goodyear, Assistant Land Surveyor II Emilio Rende, Wildlife Biologist Scott Cornett, Fisheries Biologist Charles Cranston, Environmental Analyst 1 Kurt Roberts, Conservation Operations Supervisor 2 Acknowledgments The Allegany Unit Management Planning Team would like to gratefully acknowledge the efforts of all those who contributed to this plan. We particularly would like to thank the following people for information and review they provided: Ron Abraham, Senior Forester Daniel Shaffer, Forestry Technician III Stephanie Schmid, GIS Specialist Sarah Hoskinson, Natural Resources Planner Nicholas Brown, Forestry Technician II Richard Sylvestro, Forester Trainee 1 Kaytlynn Walters, Forestry Technician Job Lowry, Seasonal Forestry Technician Zane Ueblhear, Seasonal Forestry Technician Jeremy Hurst, Wildlife Biologist Christopher Miller, Mineral Resources Pete Liebig, Forest Ranger New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Lands and Forests Region 9 2524 County Route 2A, Almond, NY 14804 (585) 466-3241 http://www.dec.ny.gov/about/27790.html DEC’s Mission "The quality of our environment is fundamental to our concern for the quality of life. -
Letchworth State Park Wyoming County, NY Home of the Grand Canyon of the East
2019 Official Visitor Guide Letchworth State Park Wyoming County, NY Home of the Grand Canyon of the East Your adventure GoWyomingCountyNY.com awaits ... 1-800-839-3919 WELCOME TO WYOMING COUNTY Montreal Ottawa Yours to Explore LETCHWORTH STATE PARK, PHOTO CREDIT BREEZE PHOTOGRAPHY 401 VT 81 87 Toronto NY NH Lake Ontario QEW Syracuse Niagara Rochester Falls 90 90 Buffalo Boston Welcome and thank you 81 Albany MA Lake Erie 88 86 90 for picking up the 2019 Guide. 17 87 90 Erie 17 CT RI We are very proud to be the home of Letchworth State Park, 79 PA Scranton and invite you to experience its majestic beauty and see why New York City it was voted #1 State Park in the US, and #1 attraction in New York State. 81 NJ Harrisburg Pittsburgh Newark After your visit to Letchworth State Park, there is plenty more adventure Philadelphia waiting just a short drive away. Enjoy a historic train excursion aboard the Arcade & Attica Railroad, get up-close with exotic animals at Hidden Valley Animal Adventure, and enjoy delicious food while watching a • Albany, NY – 3.75 hours drive-in movie at the one-of-a-kind Charcoal Corral and Silver Lake Twin • Cleveland, OH – 3.25 hours Drive-in. These are just a few of the fun and exciting adventures that await you here in Wyoming County, New York. • Hamilton, Canada – 1.75 hours • New York City, NY – 5 hours For more information, be sure to visit our mobile friendly website • Pittsburgh, PA – 3.75 hours GoWyomingCountyNY.com. We invite you and your family to visit and let • Toronto, Canada – 2.5 hours us be your guide, as you plan an experience that will last a lifetime. -
George Thomas – 2015 Summit GT Presentation
Report Card PURPOSE: • Raise public awareness of the overall state of the Genesee River Basin • Provide a basis for conversation about what is important to improve water quality in the Genesee River • Make visible the targets to improve the water quality in, and access to, the Genesee River • Make sure we are making progress on those targets NOTE: No new data collection. 1 Genesee RiverWatch Restoring Our River Work Worth Doing 2 Summit • Overarching goals of the 2014 Summit were: – Begin the process of forging a regional alliance capable of planning and implementing programs that deal with the Genesee River Basin as an integrated system – Develop action plans to address the highest priority pollution reduction projects identified during the Summit – Establish the basis for a Genesee River Basin Improvement Action Plan 3 Genesee River Basin Rochester Embayment Genesee River Action Strategy Area of Concern Watershed Project 2004 Remedial Action Plan 2013 Genesee River Basin Summit 2014 Review New EDC-Fundable Stakeholder/Citizen Studies Projects Issues/Concerns Stakeholder Citizen Genesee River Basin Outreach 9-Element Watershed Plan Genesee River Basin Summit Allows access to funding 2015 for anyone in Basin More Revise Projects Plan • SUNY Brockport Genesee River Basin Study – Basis for our 2014 Summit and DEC’s Nine- Element Plan – Work conducted over a 3-year period to monitor and model the water quality of the entire basin – Published a 7-volume, 700+ page report in late 2013 5 • First Summit was held in February 2014 • 185 attendees -
Genesee River Nine Element Watershed Plan
Nine Key Element Watershed Plan Assessment Form New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Division of Water is responsible for t reviewing and approving watershed plans to ensure the plans meet the Nine Key Elements established by the USEPA. This form is to be completed by NYSDEC staff to ensure each of the Nine Key Elements are addressed in plans that are designated as State Approved Plans. Watershed plan title: Genesee River Basin Nine Element Watershed Plan for Phosphorus and Sediment Pollutant(s) addressed by plan: Phosphorus and Sediment Prepared by: New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Water Submitted by: New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Water Addresses watershed with an existing TMDL Update to previously approved plan Reviewer 1: Karen Stainbrook Reviewer 2: Cameron Ross Comments: Watershed plan is approved as a State Approved Nine Key Element Watershed Plan Date Approved: 9/30/2015 Page 1 | 6 Directions to the reviewer For each item on the form, indicate if the item is present. If an item is not applicable, indicate N/A and explain in the comments section. Where possible, indicate the page number or section in the plan where the item is found. It is not necessary for every item on the form to be included in the watershed plan. However, each of the nine key elements must be satisfactorily addressed for the plan to receive approval. The reviewer is directed to the Handbook for Developing Watershed Plans to Restore and Protect our Waters (USEPA Office of Water Nonpoint Source Control Branch, 2008; EPA 841-B-08-002) to assist in determining if each element is adequately addressed.