DOCSLIB.ORG

Scope of Work (Sow) Pmis 248386

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Scope of Work (Sow) Pmis 248386 SCOPE OF WORK (SOW) PMIS 248386 PREPARE HISTORIC STRUCTURE REPORT FOR 11 WILDERNESS STRUCTURES NORTH CASCADES NATIONAL PARK SERVICE COMPLEX Prepared by: Kim DiCenzo I. BACKGROUND PURPOSE AND INTENT A. Background: Designated in 1988, the Stephen Mather Wilderness comprises 94% of the total area of North Cascades National Park Service Complex (NOCA). Contained within the designated wilderness are 11 structures listed on the National Register of Historic Places. Recent lawsuits within our district have brought the maintenance of such structures into the news (e.g. Wilderness Watch v. Creachbaum). NOCA intends to update the Wilderness Stewardship Plan in the next 5-10 years. The pre-NEPA process identified a data gap pertaining to whether historic structures are integral to wilderness character in the Stephen Mather Wilderness. This Historic Structure Report (HSR) will conduct much needed research to answer this question, as well as provide treatment recommendations that are appropriate in wilderness as well as other standard HSR documentation. These 11 historic structures which are the subject of the HSR are all generally small, one- room cabins or shelters, built between the late 19th century and 1950s during the USFS’s tenure of the public land. All but one of the them were initially documented as contributing resources in the park’s Multiple Property Documentation of Historic Resources of the North Cascades (Luxenberg 1988), with one additional resource proposed to be added to the MPD at the time of this writing (Neely et. al 2021 in progress). They are largely located along the park’s wilderness trail system requiring up to a 15 mile hike one way to conduct a site visit. B. Purpose: As stated in Director’s Order 28 – Cultural Resource Management, no restoration or extensive rehabilitation may be undertaken without an approved Historic Structures Report (HSR) for the resource. While a large scale rehabilitation is not planned for any of these structures, the purpose of this work is to reinforce the NPS’s preservation imperative in this congressionally designated wilderness area. This HSR will help the park prepare for the Wilderness Stewardship planning efforts by defining appropriate treatments, identifying potential threats, and keeping the structures in good overall condition. Page 1 of 12 The HSR developed under this contract will provide the baseline documentation necessary to guide the continued preservation, rehabilitation and maintenance of the Stephen Mather Wilderness historic structures. The HSR shall identify and document the following: a. Original appearance; b. Historic development and evolution; c. Historic integrity; d. Physical descriptions and conditions; e. Identify character-defining features; f. Record of past treatments g. Provide recommendations for future treatment. h. Identify threats to the properties D. Preservation Imperatives: Employ the following documents and practices throughout all stages of the documentation process: 1. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties; 2. Director's Order #28: Cultural Resource Management; 3. Maintain communication with NOCA cultural resource staff. II. GENERAL INFORMATION A. Period of Performance (POP): The POP for this contract is approximately 2 years from the time of award estimated to be in August or September of 2021 to September 1, 2023. B. Project Identification / PMIS Number: Prepare Historic Structure Report for 11 Wilderness Structures / PMIS #248386. Provide contract numbers and project identification on all correspondence and submittals. C. Project Location: North Cascades National Park Service Complex in Skagit, Whatcom and Chelan counties, Washington D. Point of Contact (POC): 1. Contractual POC: a. Contracting Officer (CO): Michael Beatty Phone: 360-854-7219 Email: [email protected] 2. Technical POC: a. Project Manager and Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR): Kim DiCenzo Phone: 360-854-7341 (office) Email: [email protected] Page 2 of 12 III. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE CONTRACT A. General: The work of this contract shall comply with the following: 1. All documents shall be prepared in accordance with NPS Director’s Order #28 – Cultural Resource Management and the associated 28 – Cultural Resource Management Guidelines, and Preservation Brief #43 – The Preparation and Use of Historic Structures Reports . 2. Quality Control (QC): The contractor is responsible for Quality Control, which includes ensuring the technical accuracy, completeness, and correctness of the Historic Structure Report, and all historical, and architectural aspects including coordination of all disciplines with each other and with the recommendations. a. The contractor shall review, coordinate and correct (if necessary) each document prior to submittal. 3. All work performed shall comply with applicable laws, regulations and NPS policies and guidelines. 4. English System of Weights and Measurements shall be used. 5. Level of Documentary Research: Thorough as defined by NPS-28 Cultural Resource Management Guidelines. 6. Level of Physical Investigation: Thorough as defined by NPS-28 Cultural Resource Management Guidelines. B. Qualifications: The work of this contract shall be led by a Historical Architect meeting the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards for Historic Architecture or an Architectural Historian meeting the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards for History C. Project Management, Administration and Meetings: 1. Government Contract Administration: Contract administration and technical direction for the contract will be provided by the Contracting Officer (CO) and/or their authorized representative (Contract Specialist (CS) and/or COR). a. The CO, CS and/or COR will be made known to the contractor at the time of award or earlier. 2. Contract Administration: The contractor shall provide a single point of contact (POC) knowledgeable and able to make decisions on all matters pertaining to this contract. a. The POC shall be made known to the Government at the time the contract Proposal is submitted. 3. Meetings: The contractor shall facilitate and, along with other pertinent personnel, attend all meetings specified herein. a. Virtual Meetings: Unless otherwise indicated all meeting will be virtual. The contractor shall arrange meeting venues (conference lines or other as applicable). b. Meeting Agendas and Notes: The contractor shall prepare agendas and meeting notes accurately documenting substantial issues discussed and all decisions made at meetings. Page 3 of 12 i. Meeting Agendas shall be delivered to all potential attendees a minimum of one (1) working day prior to the subject meeting; ii. Meeting Notes shall be distributed to all attendees and designated interested parties within five (5) working days of the meeting. c. Additional Meetings: Meetings other than those specified here may be necessary to ensure the orderly completion of the work. Contractor shall plan for up to two (2) additional meetings. IV. BASE CONTRACT – KICKOFF AND FIELD WORK A. Kick-off Meeting: The contractor Team shall participate in a conference call to review contract goals and logistics after award but prior to starting Field Work. B. Archival Research: As a basis for the investigation and assessment, the contractor shall review the government-furnished documents listed in Attachment 1 of this SOW before conducting the field work The Park shall provide access to additional archival materials pertaining to the Park provided the Contractor submits appropriate appointments in advance, subject to staff and space availability and following appropriate COVID-19 protocols. Park collections and archival materials are curated at North Cascades National Park in Marblemount, WA. It may be necessary to access other archives including National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) in Seattle, NPS electronic Technical Information Center (eTIC), Integrated Resource Management Applications (IRMA), or through other outside collections facilities. One important archival collection remains with a local retired employee which will likely require a visit to his house. C. Field Work: The contractor shall conduct on-site existing conditions assessments of all wilderness structures. See Attachment 2 for list of these structures and their locations. 1. The purpose of the assessment is to develop an understanding of the existing conditions of the buildings. At a minimum the structures shall be investigated for the following: a. Understanding the evolution of changes to the buildings over time; b. Evaluating the historic integrity of the buildings; c. Evaluating the condition and integrity of building envelopes against water and pest intrusion (if applicable); d. Evaluating the condition of historic exterior materials including roofs and trim, walls, doors and windows (if applicable); e. Evaluating the structural condition of the buildings; f. Evaluating the condition of interior finishes and materials (if applicable); g. Treatment recommendations to mitigate ongoing and potential impacts within the acceptable parameters of Wilderness and with an understanding of the Minimum Tool concept. 2. During all site visits, at least one Contractor personnel meeting the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Architectural Historian or Historical Architect will be present. Page 4 of 12 3. Safety: The contractor shall be fully responsible for the safety of all personnel and shall perform the investigations using
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY for a 9.1-ACRE TRACT at GRANBURY, HOOD COUNTY, TEXAS July 20, 2017
    July 24, 2017 Texas Historic Commission Ms. Rebecca Shelton P.O. Box 12276 Austin, Texas 78711 Re: ADDENDUM LETTER: PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT AND SUBSEQUENT CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY Colonel Etheridge Boulevard & Financial Plaza Huntsville, Texas 77340 THC Track #201609685 Reference: Brazos Crossing Dear Ms. Shelton: On August 4, 2016, AEI issued a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment for the above- referenced property. As part of HUD guidelines, AEI submitted a request to the Texas Historical Commission (THC) regarding determination on whether development of the subject property will affect property repair, rehabilitation of an existing structure, conversion of use, demolition, new construction, or the acquisition of undeveloped land. On August 10, 2016, AEI received a response from the THC stating that the subject property has never been formerly surveyed for cultural resources and there is potential for archeological resources to be present within the project area. In addition, the THC was notified of a log cabin being present on the property in 2014 and requested more information on the log cabin including: the original location of the cabin, the circumstances of the move, any modifications made to the structure after the move, and to provide photographs of the structure prior to the move. Based on this information, the THC recommended that a professional archaeologist conduct an intensive archeological survey of the entire project area, thus the Phase I conclusions included this recommendation as well. This letter serves as the addendum to the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment and provides the results of the Cultural Resources Survey which was subsequently performed on the subject property per recommendation by the THC.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Historic Fire Towers and Lookout Life in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park Laura Beth Ingle Clemson University, [email protected]
    Clemson University TigerPrints All Theses Theses 5-2011 Every Day Is Fire Day: A Study of Historic Fire Towers and Lookout Life in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park Laura Beth Ingle Clemson University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Ingle, Laura Beth, "Every Day Is Fire Day: A Study of Historic Fire Towers and Lookout Life in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park" (2011). All Theses. 1130. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses/1130 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Theses by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EVERY DAY IS FIRE DAY: A STUDY OF HISTORIC FIRE TOWERS AND LOOKOUT LIFE IN THE GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK A Thesis Presented to The Graduate Schools of Clemson University and the College of Charleston In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Historic Preservation by Laura Beth Ingle May 2011 Accepted by: Ashley Robbins Wilson, Committee Chair Barry Stiefel, Ph.D. James Liphus Ward ABSTRACT When the Great Smoky Mountains National Park (GRSM) was established in 1931, complete fire suppression was the fire management philosophy and goal in all national parks and forests across the country. Debris and undergrowth was cleared, fire breaks and manways were created, and thousands of fire towers were constructed. The young men of the Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) provided much of the manpower to complete these tasks, and the group’s signature rustic style left its mark on structures throughout the park.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory and Evaluation of Historic Resources Gilbert
    INVENTORY AND EVALUATION OF HISTORIC RESOURCES GILBERT ROAD EXTENSION Prepared for: Valley Metro 101 N. 1st Avenue, Suite 1300 Phoenix, AZ 85003 Prepared by: Archaeological Consulting Services, Ltd. 424 W. Broadway Tempe, AZ 85282 With contributions from: Arizona Historical Research April 2013 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background: Because the Light Rail Transit (LRT) Gilbert Road Extension is federally funded, a cultural resources impacts assessment will need to be conducted to determine potential impacts to historic properties as per Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), Department of Transportation Act Section 4(f), and National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA). HDR, Inc. contracted with Archaeological Consulting Services, Ltd. (ACS) to conduct a historic building inventory, a National Register of Historic Places (National Register) eligibility assessment of properties dating prior to 1968, and an impacts assessment—including potential visual and physical impacts—of the proposed undertaking on any identified historic properties within the area of potential effect (APE). The Gilbert Road Extension project includes a double-track LRT guideway that would operate along the middle of Main Street from just east of Edgemont to Gilbert Road, a total of two miles. Two Build Alternatives (2-Lane and 4-Lane) and one design option (2- Lane Roundabouts) were originally considered and are evaluated in this report. In addition, a Build Alternative (Hybrid) was recently developed which includes elements of the original alternatives and is also evaluated. On April 4, 2013, the City of Mesa Council approved the Build Alternative (Hybrid) as the preferred alternative (PA) for the project. Two park-and-ride options are also being considered: Park-and-Ride (North Option) and Park-and-Ride (South Option).
    [Show full text]
  • Landform Mapping at North Cascades National Park Service Complex, Washington
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Geomorphology of the Thunder Creek Watershed Landform Mapping at North Cascades National Park Service Complex, Washington Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCCN/NRTR—2012/567 ON THE COVER Clockwise from upper right: Thunder Creek main channel; Debris cones in Fisher Creek; Fisher Peak; Headwaters of Skagit Queen Creek; Upper Fisher Basin from just below Easy Pass. Photographs by, and used with courtesy of, Crystal Briggs, Natural Resource Conservation Service Geomorphology of the Thunder Creek Watershed Landform Mapping at North Cascades National Park Service Complex, Washington Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCCN/NRTR—2012/567 Jon Riedel Sharon Brady Stephen Dorsch Jeanna Wenger National Park Service North Cascades National Park 7280 Ranger Station Road Marblemount, Washington 98267 April 2012 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Technical Report Series is used to disseminate results of scientific studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series provides contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner.
    [Show full text]
  • National Park System Properties in the National Register of Historic Places
    National Park System Properties in the National Register of Historic Places Prepared by Leslie H. Blythe, Historian FTS (202) 343-8150 January, 1994 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Cultural Resources Park Historic Architecture Division United States Department of the Interior NATIONAL PARK SERVICE P.O. Box 37127 Washington, D.C. 20013-7127 H30(422) MAR 3 11994 Memorandum To: Regional Directors and Superintendents r From: Associate Director, Cultural Resources Subject: MPS Properties in the National Register of Historic Places Attached for your information is an updated list of properties within the National Park System listed in the National Register of Historic Places. National Historic Landmark status, documentation status, dates, and the National Register database reference number are included. This list reflects changes within 1993. Information for the sections Properties Determined Eligible by Keeper and Properties Determined Eligible by NPS and SHPO is not totally available in the Washington office. Any additional information for these sections or additions, corrections, and questions concerning this listing should be referred to Leslie Blythe, Park Historic Architecture Division, 202-343-8150. Attachment SYMBOLS KEY: Documentation needed. Documentation may need to be revised or updated. (•) Signifies property not owned by NPS. Signifies property only partially owned by NPS (including easements). ( + ) Signifies National Historic Landmark designation. The date immediately following the symbol is the date that the property was designated an NHL (Potomac Canal Historic District (+ 12/17/82) (79003038). Some properties designated NHLs after being listed will have two records in the NR database: one for the property as an historical unit of the NPS, the other for the property as an NHL.
    [Show full text]
  • Presenting Nature
    National Park Service: Presenting Nature PRESENTING NATURE: The Historic Landscape Design of the National Park Service 1916 to 1942 Presenting Nature MENU Cover Contents Foreword Acknowledgements Overview Stewardship Design Ethic Origins (1916-1927) Design Policy & Process (1916-1927) Western Field Office (1927-1932) Linda Flint McClelland Park Planning National Register of Historic Places Decade of Expansion Interagency Resources Division (1933-1942) State Parks National Park Service (1933-1942) 1993 Appendix A http://www.nps.gov/history/history/online_books/mcclelland/mcclelland.htm[12/13/2013 12:23:28 PM] National Park Service: Presenting Nature Appendix B Bibliography >>> Contents <<< History | Links to the Past | National Park Service | Search | Contact Top Last Modified: Sat, Oct 26 2002 10:00:00 pm PDT http://www.cr.nps.gov/history/online_books/mcclelland/mcclelland.htm http://www.nps.gov/history/history/online_books/mcclelland/mcclelland.htm[12/13/2013 12:23:28 PM] National Park Service: Presenting Nature (Table of Contents) Presenting Nature: The Historic Landscape Design of the National Park Service, 1916-1942 CONTENTS COVER To the designers of national parks, presenting nature meant bringing visitors to the parks. Roads and trails were located and designed show nature's wonders from the best point of view while leaving scenic vistas Presenting Nature and natural features unimpaired. A memorandum agreement with the Bureau of Public Roads enabled the National Park Service to build roads MENU according to the highest technical stand and ensure that designs were in harmony with nature. (National Park Service Historic Photography Cover Collection) Contents FOREWORD Foreword ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Acknowledgements OVERVIEW Overview I. STEWARDSHIP FOR A NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Stewardship II.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NPS Form 10-900 OMBNo. 1024-0018 (Rev. 8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places DEC 2 91988 Registration Form NATIONAL This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations of eligibility for individual properties or distrrcfs. See instructions in Guidelines for Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16), .Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, styles, materials, and areas of significance, enter only the categories and subcategories listed in the instructions. For additional space use continuation sheets (Form 10-900a). Type all entries. 1. Name of Property "" historic name__________________________________________________________ other names/site number Historic Resources of North Cascades National Park Service Complex___ ______________Cover form for Multiple Resource Submission_____________________ 2. Location street & number Nat ional Park and Recreation Area boundaries as 1 not for publication city, town defined Tw the> National Park vicinity State y,a sTrt n g 1" nn code county Cnelan; Skagit; codeQ07; 057 zip code N/A Whatcom 073 3. Classification Ownership of Property Category of Property Number of Resources within Property m private KS! building(s) Contributing Noncontributing l~~l public-local ^ district 43 335" buildings EH public-State it 5. 13 sites |X%1 public-Federal
    [Show full text]