DOCSLIB.ORG

Send Neighbourhood Development Plan 2017-2031 State of the Parish

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Send Neighbourhood Development Plan 2017-2031 State of the Parish Send Neighbourhood Development Plan 2017-2031 State of the Parish Report Published by Send Parish Council August 2018 1 | P a g e Send Neighbourhood Development Plan State of the Parish Report Contents 1. Introduction 2. Background 3. Processes 4. Parish Character and Statistic 5. Community Views on Planning Issues in the Parish 6. The Planning Context Plans/Maps Annexes Tables & Graphs 2 | P a g e 1 Introduction 1.1 This report will provide an overview of the information and evidence which has been compiled jointly by Send Parish Council, the Neighbourhood Plan Working Group and Action in rural Sussex, as the first stage in the development of the Send Neighbourhood Development Plan (Send NDP) 1.2 Purpose of this report: The purpose of this report is to summarise the evidence base and the context within which the Send NDP will be prepared, and by which the draft and final versions of the Send NDP will be assessed and refined. It provides a comprehensive summary record of the extensive work which has been undertaken as part of the initial phase of developing the Neighbourhood Plan and providing context against which a baseline of understanding may be developed, thereby allowing the identification of the existing and emerging issues which the Neighbourhood Plan should seek to address. 1.3 Guildford Borough Council (GBC) has not yet confirmed whether a Strategic Environment Assessment (SEA) or a Sustainability Appraisal (SA) will be required. This will be known once a screening opinion has been undertaken by GBC. If an SEA or SA is required, a scoping report will be undertaken and produced in a separate document. 1.4 Function of this report: This report outline the approaches which have been taken in order to gather information about the locality, its functions are to: • Outline what the Neighbourhood Plan can and cannot realistically achieve; • Provide a summary of the activity undertaken and information captured as part of the Plan’s development; • Ensure that those living in or adjacent to the designated Neighbourhood Plan area are made aware of the key issues identified; • To provide residents, interested stakeholders and statutory partners with robust evidence and a summary of the key issues in order to guide how they contribute or respond to the Send NDP making process. 1.5 The information contained within this document will be used as the basis for further consultation with the community, key stakeholders and the Local Planning Authority in order to establish how challenges identified may be responded to by the Send NDP. 3 | P a g e 1.6 The Send Parish Council application to designate a Neighbourhood Area was approved by Guildford Borough Council on xxxx. 1.7 1.8 1.9 The Send NDP is being prepared in accordance with the Neighbourhood Planning Regulations 2012, the Localism Act 2011 and the Planning & Compulsory Purchase Act 2004. Plan A: Send NDP Plan Area designation 4 | P a g e 2 Introduction 2.1 Send is a large village and the primary settlement of Send civil parish in the County of Surrey. It is located in the North West corner of Guildford Borough in the centre of Surrey. Primarily a metropolitan area, the parish is bordered by both green belt and sections of the River Wey which separate it from adjacent settlements. It has a long history and was first recorded in the Doomsday Book of 1086 as Sande. 2.2 At the time of the Doomsday Book it was held by Rainald from Alvred de Merleburgh (Marlborough). Its domesday assets were: 20 hides (units of land used for tax assessment), 1 church, 10 ploughs, 2 mills worth £1 3s 6d, 5 fisheries worth 4s 6d, 84 acres (34 ha) of meadow, and woodland worth 160 hogs. It was headed by 41 households and had additionally fifteen serfs, although whether they had households or not is uncertain. It rendered £15 10s 0d per year to its overlords. 2.3 The parish is adjacent to the main A3 road which runs north east to south west and forms its entire southern border. This road provides connectivity to Southampton via Petersfield and Guildford (located approximately 5 miles to the south west) and to the M25 London Circular located approximately 5 miles to the north east. In addition, there are numerous A and B road links to nearby villages and towns. 2.4 Send has no train station of its own, but the parish is located is relatively close to Guildford, Woking, Worplesdon and West Clandon stations, which offer (stopping, semi-fast and fast) main line rail services to London and to south coast destinations including Portsmouth and Southampton. 2.5 As befits a settlement of its population size (4,245), Send is served by a wide range of amenities and services. This includes a Health Centre, Post Office, 2 Public Houses, 2 churches, a Primary School, meeting rooms, social club, a recreation ground, two well-equipped play areas and numerous retailers and eateries. 2.6 In addition to the amenities, the community has a number of active sports clubs and community societies, including a football team and cricket club. Background 2.7 Under the Localism Act (2011) and related Neighbourhood Planning Regulations (2012), local communities can have a larger say on the development of their area by undertaking neighbourhood planning. 2.8 The National Planning Policy Framework states that ”… neighbourhoods should develop plans that support the strategic development needs set out in Local Plans, including policies for housing and economic development; plan positively to support local development, shaping and directing development in their area that is outside the strategic elements of the Local Plan; and identify opportunities to use Neighbourhood Development Orders to enable developments that are consistent 5 | P a g e with their neighbourhood plan to proceed. (para 16) 2.9 Neighbourhood planning gives communities direct power to develop a shared vision for their neighbourhood and deliver the sustainable development they need. Parishes … can use neighbourhood planning to set planning policies through neighbourhood plans to determine decisions on planning applications; and grant planning permission through Neighbourhood Development Orders and Community Right to Build Orders for specific development which complies with the order. (para.183) 2.10 Neighbourhood planning provides a powerful set of tools for local people to ensure that they get the right types of development for their community. The ambition of the neighbourhood should be aligned with the strategic needs and priorities of the wider local area. Neighbourhood plans must be in general conformity with the strategic policies of the Local Plan. To facilitate this, local planning authorities should set out clearly their strategic policies for the area and ensure that an up -to-date Local Plan is in place as quickly as possible. Neighbourhood plans should reflect these policies and neighbourhoods should plan positively to support them. Neighbourhood plans and orders should not promote less development than set out in the Local Plan or undermine its strategic policies. (para.184) 2.11 Outside these strategic elements, neighbourhood plans will be able to shape and direct sustainable development in their area. Once a neighbourhood plan has demonstrated its general conformity with the strategic policies of the Local Plan and is brought into force, the policies it contains take precedence over existing non- strategic policies in the Local Plan for that neighbourhood, where they are in conflict. Local planning authorities should avoid duplicating planning processes for non-strategic policies where a neighbourhood plan is in preparation.” (para.185) 6 | P a g e 3 Processes 3.1 The Plan Preparation Process: The process of preparing the Send NDP is set out in the Neighbourhood Planning (General) Regulations 2012. This comprises: • Undertaking background research and evidence baseline work and informal public and stakeholder consultation (carried out between 2015 - 2018); • Publishing a Pre-Submission Neighbourhood Plan and the draft Sustainability Appraisal for a statutory six-week public consultation period • Revising the draft Neighbourhood Plan and Sustainability Appraisal where appropriate in line with consultee responses; • Submission of the Neighbourhood Plan and Sustainability Appraisal to the local planning authority (GBC) for a legal check; • Publication of the Neighbourhood Plan for a further 6 weeks by the local planning authority (GBC); • Examination by an independent Examiner appointed by the local planning authority (GBC) in consultation with Send Parish Council (see section below). 3.2 The Examination Process: The independent Examiner must consider whether the Neighbourhood Plan meets the ‘Basic Conditions’. The Basic Conditions are set out in paragraph 8(2) of Schedule 4B to the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 as applied to neighbourhood development plans by section 38A of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004. They are that: 1. “Having regard to national policies and advice contained in guidance issued by the Secretary of State it is appropriate to make the neighbourhood plan; 2. The making of the neighbourhood plan contributes to the achievement of sustainable development; 3. The making of the neighbourhood plan is in general conformity with the strategic policies contained in the development plan for the area of the authority. 4. The making of the neighbourhood plan does not breach, and is otherwise compatible with, EU obligations. 5. Prescribed conditions are met in relation to the neighbourhood plan and prescribed matters have been complied with in connection with the proposal for the plan”. 3.3 With regard to Basic Condition 5 above, Regulation 32 of the Neighbourhood Planning (General) Regulations 2012 (as amended) prescribes the following basic condition for the purpose of paragraph 8(2)(g) of Schedule 4B to the Town and Country Planning Act: “The making of the Neighbourhood Plan is not likely to have a significant effect on a European Site (as defined in the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2012) or a European Offshore Marine Site (as defined in the Offshore Marine Conservation (Natural Habitats, &c.) Regulations 2007) either alone or in combination with other plans or projects”.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • EPC Minutes 7.1.14 V1.0 C.Ritchie 8.1.14
    MINUTES OF ORDINARY MEETING OF EFFINGHAM PARISH COUNCIL 8.00pm, Tuesday 28 Jan 2014 King GeorGe V Hall, Browns Lane, Effingham Present Cllr Pindar – Chair Cllrs Bell, Bowerman, Martland, Symes, Wetenhall Clerk 16 local government electors 14.14 APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE Cllr Hogger – Illness Cllr Lightfoot – Family commitment Cllr Moss – Family commitment 15.14 REGISTER OF INTERESTS & OTHER INTERESTS AFFECTING THIS AGENDA Cllr Bell declared an interest as a managing trustee of EVRT Cllr Bowerman declared an interest as a managing trustee of EVRT Cllr Martland declared an interest in the planning application on Orestan Lane Cllr Symes declared an interest in the planning application on Heathview 16.14 MINUTES OF THE PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the ordinary meeting of 7 Jan 2013 were agreed and signed. 17.14 MATTERS ARISING FROM THE PREVIOUS MINUTES Use of new summary table to record matters arising was agreed and to be used as appendix to future minutes. 18.14 MATTERS RAISED BY RESIDENTS Care Home Appeal – A resident thanked the Parish Council for their work at the recent care home Appeal. EPFA Licence – Chair of EPFA read a statement asking whether the EVRT [1] EPC Minutes 7.1.14 V1.0 C.Ritchie 8.1.14 managing trustees had the support of the Parish Council. Cllr Pindar confirmed the Council’s support and read the council’s response to EPFA’s letter received at 7 Jan. EPFA Licence – A resident asked for a meeting with the Custodian Trustee to discuss the issues over licence negotiations. Cllr Pindar advised that EPFA should write to the Custodian Trustee with any new concerns.
    [Show full text]
  • Heterogeneous Supercomputer Advances Viral Research and Animal Health
    Heterogeneous Supercomputer Advances Viral Research and Animal Health Atos supercomputer with Intel® processors helps the Pirbright Institute safeguard livestock and humans from the rising threat of viral diseases The Context The Challenge The Solution When a deadly virus emerges, scientists • Rising demand for computational Taking advantage of Intel® technologies must respond rapidly to characterize resources threatened to outstrip and Atos expertise, Pirbright implemented the virus, track its spread, and stop it from the capacity provided by Pirbright’s legacy an Atos HPC system with heterogeneous devastating livestock and possibly infecting mix of servers, clusters, and workstations. nodes based on the Intel® Xeon® processor humans. As a global leader in this work, • Pirbright sought a versatile system E7 and E5 families. the Pirbright Institute in the UK needs that could accelerate progress in areas flexible high-performance computing (HPC) such as genome assembly of complex Atos Life Sciences Center of Excellence resources that can handle a wide variety viruses and hosts, epidemiology studies (LSCoE) experts worked hand in hand of workloads. Pirbright deployed an Atos to monitor virus migration, with Pirbright to provide a bespoke compute supercomputer powered by Intel® Xeon® and the development of innovative platform to enable researchers increase processors. With a unified environment analytics tools. the efficiency of their processes and running its diverse applications, Pirbright ultimately ensure the control of viral diseases. enhances scientific productivity and helps policymakers respond effectively when a viral outbreak threatens. Located in Surrey, England, Pirbright is the UK’s flagship research center focused The results • ·By running its diverse workloads on giving the UK capabilities on a unified environment, Pirbright lowers to predict, detect, understand, and respond management overhead and avoids to economically important viral diseases the time and expense of moving vast of livestock.
    [Show full text]
  • RT-LAMP Has High Accuracy for Detecting SARS-Cov-2 in Saliva and 2 Naso/Oropharyngeal Swabs from Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Individuals
    medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.28.21259398; this version posted August 20, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license . 1 RT-LAMP has high accuracy for detecting SARS-CoV-2 in saliva and 2 naso/oropharyngeal swabs from asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals 3 Short title: RT-LAMP for detecting SARS-CoV-2 in saliva and naso/oropharyngeal swabs 4 †Stephen P. Kidd1,2, †Daniel Burns1,3, Bryony Armson1,2,4, Andrew D. Beggs5, Emma L. A. Howson6, 5 Anthony Williams7, Gemma Snell7, Emma L. Wise1,8, Alice Goring1, Zoe Vincent-Mistiaen9, Seden 6 Grippon1, Jason Sawyer10, Claire Cassar10, David Cross10, Tom Lewis10, Scott M. Reid10, Samantha 7 Rivers10, Joe James10, Paul Skinner10, Ashley Banyard10, Kerrie Davies11, Anetta Ptasinska5, Celina 8 Whalley5, Jack Ferguson5, Claire Bryer5, Charlie Poxon5, Andrew Bosworth5, Michael Kidd5,12, Alex 9 Richter13, Jane Burton14, Hannah Love14, Sarah Fouch1, Claire Tillyer1, Amy Sowood1, Helen Patrick1, 10 Nathan Moore1, Michael Andreou15, Nick Morant16, Rebecca Houghton1, Joe Parker17, Joanne Slater- 11 Jefferies17, Ian Brown10, Cosima Gretton2, Zandra Deans2, Deborah Porter2, Nicholas J. Cortes1,9, Angela 12 Douglas2, Sue L. Hill2, *Keith M. Godfrey18,19, +Veronica L. Fowler1,2 13 14 1Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Microbiology, Basingstoke and North Hants
    [Show full text]
  • Reader/Professor of Vaccinology
    READER/PROFESSOR OF VACCINOLOGY AT THE UNIVERSITY OF SURREY IN COLLABORATION WITH THE PIRBRIGHT INSTITUTE RECRUITMENT INFORMATION PACK BUILDING BRILLIANCE AT SURREY, EVERY STEP COUNTS, EVERY LITTLE DISCOVERY. The Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences has research partners in over 40 different countries worldwide. The Faculty offers an extensive portfolio of teaching programmes with considerable league table success for undergraduate, postgraduate, research and continuing professional development courses. Ranked 1st for Food Science, 1st for Veterinary Medicine, 5th for Psychology and 7th for Biosciences in the UK, the Faculty offers courses that are academically rigorous and practically relevant. The Faculty is ranked top ten for research in the UK. (REF 2014), 93 per cent of our biosciences, health, psychology and veterinary research was rated world-leading or internationally excellent, placing Surrey eighth out of 94 institutions in the Allied Health category. 02 ENTER A WORLD OF COLLABORATION SURREY IS MADE UP OF MANY TALENTED INDIVIDUALS WHO MAKE US A GREAT INSTITUTION. AND WORKING TOGETHER, AND CONNECTING WITH EXTERNAL INSTITUTIONS, BUSINESSES AND GOVERNMENT MAKE US EVEN STRONGER. Since the University’s founding in the 1960s, and technologies that will drive the UK’s future economic before that at Battersea College, our community growth. We also saw the first successful deployment of has thrived on strong connections with the world the RemoveDEBRIS satellite, a project we are leading outside our campus. This spirit of collaboration is with a consortium of space sector organisations. evident across the University today at every level. There’s real energy, momentum and ambition It informs our teaching, adds value to our research to Surrey.
    [Show full text]
  • Bovine Pestivirus Heterogeneity and Its Potential Impact on Vaccination and Diagnosis
    viruses Review Bovine Pestivirus Heterogeneity and Its Potential Impact on Vaccination and Diagnosis 1, 1 2 3,4 Victor Riitho y , Rebecca Strong , Magdalena Larska , Simon P. Graham and Falko Steinbach 1,4,* 1 Virology Department, Animal and Plant Health Agency, APHA-Weybridge, Woodham Lane, New Haw, Addlestone KT15 3NB, UK; [email protected] (V.R.); [email protected] (R.S.) 2 Department of Virology, National Veterinary Research Institute, Al. Partyzantów 57, 24-100 Puławy, Poland; [email protected] 3 The Pirbright Institute, Ash Road, Pirbright GU24 0NF, UK; [email protected] 4 School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Surrey, Guilford GU2 7XH, UK * Correspondence: [email protected] Current Address: Centre of Genomics and Child Health, The Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of y London, London E1 2AT, UK. Received: 4 September 2020; Accepted: 3 October 2020; Published: 6 October 2020 Abstract: Bovine Pestiviruses A and B, formerly known as bovine viral diarrhoea viruses (BVDV)-1 and 2, respectively, are important pathogens of cattle worldwide, responsible for significant economic losses. Bovine viral diarrhoea control programmes are in effect in several high-income countries but less so in low- and middle-income countries where bovine pestiviruses are not considered in disease control programmes. However, bovine pestiviruses are genetically and antigenically diverse, which affects the efficiency of the control programmes. The emergence of atypical ruminant pestiviruses (Pestivirus H or BVDV-3) from various parts of the world and the detection of Pestivirus D (border disease virus) in cattle highlights the challenge that pestiviruses continue to pose to control measures including the development of vaccines with improved cross-protective potential and enhanced diagnostics.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Opportunity Areas: the Basis for Realising Surrey's Local
    Biodiversity Opportunity Areas: The basis for realising Surrey’s ecological network Surrey Nature Partnership September 2019 (revised) Investing in our County’s future Contents: 1. Background 1.1 Why Biodiversity Opportunity Areas? 1.2 What exactly is a Biodiversity Opportunity Area? 1.3 Biodiversity Opportunity Areas in the planning system 2. The BOA Policy Statements 3. Delivering Biodiversity 2020 - where & how will it happen? 3.1 Some case-studies 3.1.1 Floodplain grazing-marsh in the River Wey catchment 3.1.2 Calcareous grassland restoration at Priest Hill, Epsom 3.1.3 Surrey’s heathlands 3.1.4 Priority habitat creation in the Holmesdale Valley 3.1.5 Wetland creation at Molesey Reservoirs 3.2 Summary of possible delivery mechanisms 4. References Figure 1: Surrey Biodiversity Opportunity Areas Appendix 1: Biodiversity Opportunity Area Policy Statement format Appendix 2: Potential Priority habitat restoration and creation projects across Surrey (working list) Appendices 3-9: Policy Statements (separate documents) 3. Thames Valley Biodiversity Opportunity Areas (TV01-05) 4. Thames Basin Heaths Biodiversity Opportunity Areas (TBH01-07) 5. Thames Basin Lowlands Biodiversity Opportunity Areas (TBL01-04) 6. North Downs Biodiversity Opportunity Areas (ND01-08) 7. Wealden Greensands Biodiversity Opportunity Areas (WG01-13) 8. Low Weald Biodiversity Opportunity Areas (LW01-07) 9. River Biodiversity Opportunity Areas (R01-06) Appendix 10: BOA Objectives & Targets Summary (separate document) Written by: Mike Waite Chair, Biodiversity Working Group Biodiversity Opportunity Areas: The basis for realising Surrey’s ecological network, Sept 2019 (revised) 2 1. Background 1.1 Why Biodiversity Opportunity Areas? The concept of Biodiversity Opportunity Areas (BOAs) has been in development in Surrey since 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the High Court Judgement
    Neutral Citation Number: [2019] EWHC 3242 (Admin) Case Nos: CO/2173,2174,2175/2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION ADMINISTRATIVE COURT PLANNING COURT Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Date: 04/12/2019 Before : SIR DUNCAN OUSELEY Sitting as a High Court Judge - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Between : COMPTON PARISH COUNCIL (2173) Claimants JULIAN CRANWELL (2174) OCKHAM PARISH COUNCIL (2175) - and - GUILDFORD BOROUGH COUNCIL Defendants SECRETARY OF STATE FOR HOUSING, COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT -and- WISLEY PROPERTY INVESTMENTS LTD BLACKWELL PARK LTD Interested MARTIN GRANT HOMES LTD Parties CATESBY ESTATES PLC - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Richard Kimblin QC (instructed by Richard Buxton & Co) for Compton Parish Council Richard Kimblin QC and Richard Harwood QC (instructed by Richard Buxton & Co) for Julian Cranwell Richard Harwood QC (instructed by Richard Buxton & Co) for Ockham Parish Council James Findlay QC and Robert Williams (instructed by the solicitor to Guildford Borough Council) for the First Defendant Richard Honey (instructed by the Government Legal Department) for the Second Defendant James Maurici QC and Heather Sargent (instructed by Herbert Smith Freehills LLP ) for the First Interested Party Richard Turney (instructed by Mills & Reeve LLP ) for the Second Interested Party Andrew Parkinson (instructed by Cripps Pemberton Greenish LLP ) for the Third Interested Party Christopher Young QC and James Corbet Burcher (instructed by Eversheds Sutherland LLP) for the Fourth Interested Party (in 2174) Hearing dates: 5,6 and 7 November 2019 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Approved Judgment Judgment Approved by the court for handing down. Compton PC v Guildford BC Sir Duncan Ouseley: 1. Guildford Borough Council submitted its amended proposed “Local Plan: Strategy and Sites (2015-2034)” to the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government on 13 December 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • OTHE18 – Guildford Borough Council Local Plan Judgement
    Neutral Citation Number: [2019] EWHC 3242 (Admin) Case Nos: CO/2173,2174,2175/2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION ADMINISTRATIVE COURT PLANNING COURT Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Date: 04/12/2019 Before : SIR DUNCAN OUSELEY Sitting as a High Court Judge - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Between : COMPTON PARISH COUNCIL (2173) Claimants JULIAN CRANWELL (2174) OCKHAM PARISH COUNCIL (2175) - and - GUILDFORD BOROUGH COUNCIL Defendants SECRETARY OF STATE FOR HOUSING, COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT -and- WISLEY PROPERTY INVESTMENTS LTD BLACKWELL PARK LTD Interested MARTIN GRANT HOMES LTD Parties CATESBY ESTATES PLC - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Richard Kimblin QC (instructed by Richard Buxton & Co) for Compton Parish Council Richard Kimblin QC and Richard Harwood QC (instructed by Richard Buxton & Co) for Julian Cranwell Richard Harwood QC (instructed by Richard Buxton & Co) for Ockham Parish Council James Findlay QC and Robert Williams (instructed by the solicitor to Guildford Borough Council) for the First Defendant Richard Honey (instructed by the Government Legal Department) for the Second Defendant James Maurici QC and Heather Sargent (instructed by Herbert Smith Freehills LLP ) for the First Interested Party Richard Turney (instructed by Mills & Reeve LLP ) for the Second Interested Party Andrew Parkinson (instructed by Cripps Pemberton Greenish LLP ) for the Third Interested Party Christopher Young QC and James Corbet Burcher (instructed by Eversheds Sutherland LLP) for the Fourth Interested Party (in 2174) Hearing dates: 5,6 and 7 November 2019 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Approved Judgment Judgment Approved by the court for handing down. Compton PC v Guildford BC Sir Duncan Ouseley: 1. Guildford Borough Council submitted its amended proposed “Local Plan: Strategy and Sites (2015-2034)” to the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government on 13 December 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Taylor Wimpey - Former Wisley Airfield
    Taylor Wimpey - Former Wisley Airfield Working together to develop our sustainable community 16th & 18th July 2020 Online Community Consultation Question and Answers Friday 24th July 2020 On the 16th and 18th July 2020 we held our first online community consultation events for the former Wisley Airfield. These events were a great opportunity for us to share our vision for the site with the local community, receive your feedback and answer your questions. Thank you to everyone who managed to attend one of the sessions, we really appreciate all the questions that were submitted during the events and we endeavoured to answer as many as we could. However, due to time constraints it was not possible to get through all of the questions. We greatly appreciate your feedback and it is important to us that we answer all questions that were asked. Thus, we have put together this Question and Answers document to provide the answers to all your questions. This document has been separated into key topics from your feedback and includes the questions asked by the public during the community consultation events within each of these key topic sections for ease of references. Due to the number of questions we have consolidate some that were similar in scope into under questions of the same topic. We appreciate your understanding that due to these unprecedented times and restrictions on large gatherings we opted for the online community consultation as a means of engaging with you all. It is important to us that the community is evolved and has an input from the beginning of the masterplan design process – working together to develop our sustainable development If you have a question we haven’t covered in this document, you can contact us at [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Potential Creation of a New Settlement at Wisley Airfield Stage 1: Summary of Environmental Capacity
    Potential Creation of a New Settlement at Wisley Airfield Stage 1: Summary of Environmental Capacity Wisley Airfield is located to the north east of Guildford Borough approximately 1.4km to the south east of Wisley village, 3.27km to the south west of Cobham, 2.77km to the north west of East Horsley, 0.68km to the north of Ockham, and 1.42km to the north east of Ripley. Wisley Airfield is situated within land parcel C18 (2*) with C19 (1*) to the north, C17 (3*) to the south east, C12 (2*) to the south, and C11 (2*) to the south west of the airfield. Isolated, and clusters of, residential properties are located at Elm Corner and Wilderness Farm to the north, Hatchford End and Old Lane to the north east and Upton Farm and Bridge End Farm to the south of the airfield. Wisley Airfield is physically and visually separated from the RHS Wisley gardens to the west by the A3 dual carriageway. (* indicates the Green Belt purposes score for the according land parcel) Wisley Airfield exhibits the following environmental and physical constraints: North: The disused airfield is enclosed to the north by woodland within Ockham Common that is designated as a Special Protection Area (SPA), Important Bird Area, Local Nature Reserve (LNR) and Registered Common Land. The 400 metre buffer of the SPA crosses into the disused airfield covering approximately 50ha of land to the north of the disused runway. This land within the 400 metre SPA buffer would not be appropriate for residential development. East: Ancient Woodland is located to the north east of Wisley Airfield at Hatchford Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Guildford Local Plan
    Schedule of proposed main modifications to the Submission Local Plan (2017) The proposed main modifications to the Submission Local Plan: Strategy and Sites are set out below. Text added is shown as underlined and deleted text is shown as strikethrough. Where maps have been modified, the area of change is shown within a yellow box and additions and deletions are shown on small inset maps. Contents Policies 2 Sites 46 Appendices 61 Appendix 1: Housing Trajectory 64 Appendix 2: Maps 67 1 Policies Mod Paragraph Proposed Modification No. or Section Policy S1: Presumption in favour of sustainable development MM1 Policy para (3) Where there are no policies relevant to the application or relevant policies are out of date at the time of (3)(a) making the decision, then the Council will grant permission unless material considerations indicate otherwise, taking into account whether: a) Specific policies in that Framework indicate that development should be restricted.The application of policies in the National Planning Policy Framework that protect areas or assets of particular importance provides a clear reason for refusing the development proposed; or MM1 Reasoned 4.1.4 Local Planning Authorities are encouraged to include a policy within their Local Plan that embraces the Justification presumption in favour of sustainable development. Policy S1 meets this requirement and adopts the para 4.1.4 model wording suggested. When implementing Policy S1, local circumstances will be taken into account to respond to different opportunities for achieving
    [Show full text]
  • Members of the Planning & Environment Committee, Copies to Other Cllrs for Information
    Ripley Parish Council Office, 4 Rio House, High Street, Ripley, Surrey, GU23 6AE 26th January 2021 To: Members of the Planning & Environment Committee, copies to other Cllrs for information PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING on MONDAY 1st FEBRUARY 2021 at 1800hrs at RIPLEY PARISH COUNCIL OFFICE Your attendance is required at the above meeting; the Agenda is shown below. Details of Planning Applications are available at www.guildford.gov.uk Members of the public and press have a right and are cordially invited to be present at the meeting. In accordance with The Local Authorities (Coronavirus) (Flexibility of Local Authority Meetings) (England) Regulations 2020, the meeting will be held remotely via the Zoom application. Please contact the Parish Clerk for details on how to join the meeting. Jim Morris, BSc (Hons), PSLCC Clerk to the Council AGENDA 1. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE To RECEIVE any apologies for absence from Planning & Environment Committee members 2. DISCLOSURE OF INTERESTS To RECEIVE any disclosure by members of non-pecuniary interests in agenda items To RECEIVE any written requests for new disclosable pecuniary interests dispensations Without a dispensation a member may not participate in any discussion on the matter nor vote 3. MINUTES To RECEIVE and SIGN as a correct record the Minutes of the Planning & Environment Committee meeting held on 11/01/2021 4. PLANNING APPLICATIONS To RECEIVE and CONSIDER the following planning applications and any applications received before the meeting but after Agenda dispatch. Applications received before the meeting but after Agenda publication are publicised at www.ripleyparishcouncil.gov.uk 21/P/00018 Location: Nordallee, Portsmouth Road, Ripley, GU23 6EW Proposal: Removal of condition 3 (demolition of existing buildings) of planning application 19/P/00616 approved 29/05/2019.
    [Show full text]