Joint Action on Mental Health and Well-Being

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Joint Action on Mental Health and Well-Being LITERATURE REVIEW Joint Action on Mental Health and Well-being TOWARDS COMMUNITY-BASED AND SOCIALLY INCLUSIVE MENTAL HEALTH CARE Situation analysis and recommendations for action MENTAL HEALTH AND WELLBEING REPORT | 1 Co-funded by the European Union AUTHORSHIP JM Caldas Almeida, Pedro Mateus and Gina Tomé coordinated the preparation of the Report with the participation of: Heinz Katschnig (Austria) Hristo Hinkov (Bulgaria) Indrek Sooniste (Estonia) Lajos Simon (Hungary) Angelo Fioritti (Italy) Aideen McDonnell, Terry Madden, Eithne O’Donnell (Ireland) Álvaro de Carvalho, Miguel Xavier, Graça Cardoso (Portugal) José Rodriguez, Isabel Saiz (Spain) Helen Killaspy (UK) Guadalupe Morales (ENUSP) Alfonso Montero, Kim Japing (ESN) John Saunders (EUFAMI) Pedro Montellano (GAMIAN) Maria Nyman, Josée Van Remoortel (MHE). Heinz Katschnig, Helen Killaspy, Benedetto Saraceno and Miguel Xavier gave important contributions to the structuring of the Report and the development of the questionnaires. Chiara Samele coordinated the literature review and reviewed the Report at various stages of development. ISBN: 978-989-98576-3-6 The views expressed in this report are those of the contributors and do not necessarily represent those of Government Ministries or employers. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would like to thank all the National Networks members that participated in the data collection, specially to: Austria - Alexander Grabenhofer-Eggerth, Joachim Hagleitner, Gisela Hagmair, Herbert Heintz, Christian Horvath, Günter Klug, Susanna Krainz, Edwin Ladinser, Joy Ladurner, Ullrich Meise, Georg Psota, Sophie Sagerschnig, Werner Schöny, Anton Sinabell, Sonja Valady Bulgaria - Vladimir Nakov, Zahari Zarkov Hungary - Zsofia Lehoczky Italy - Antonella Piazza Spain - Mª Jesús San Pío and Institutional and Technical Committees of the National Strategy on Mental Health, its scientific coordinators, and the national expert group. INDEX 01 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 05 I. INTRODUCTION 05 II. METHODS 11 III. LITERATURE REVIEW • Historical background to the transition from institutional to community MH services • Successful closures of psychiatric hospitals • Case example - Italy • Legislating deinstitutionalisation • Outcomes of Italian psychiatric reform • Impact on the family • Current situation • Case example - England • Case Example - Spain • Creation of community based services • Community care models and effectiveness • Supportive housing and residential care • Cost benefits and cost-effectiveness of community based mental healthcare • Challenges to the closure of psychiatric hospitals and development of community mental health services • Facilitators and strategies to closures of psychiatric hospitals and development of community alternatives • Social inclusion and transition • Ingredients of success • Health policy implications 35 IV. TRANSITION FROM INSTITUTIONAL CARE TO COMMUNITY-BASED CARE IN EU 1. Mental health services reforms 2. Mental health policy, plans and legislation 3. Mental health services 4. Human Resources in EU countries 5. Financial resources in EU countries 6. Human rights and compulsory treatment 7. Support towards social inclusion for people with mental health problems 8. Representation of users and carers 83 V. ACHIEVEMENTS, BARRIERS AND FACILITATING FACTORS 90 VI. SWOT ANALYSIS 92 VII. PAST AND UNDERGOING EUROPEAN PROJECTS RELATED WITH TRANSITION FROM INSTITUTIONAL TO COMMUNITY BASED CARE 101 VIII. KEY FINDINGS AND POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS • Benefits of community-based mental health care • Further developments and advancements are needed • Key findings • Policy recommendations 1. Generating political commitment for mental health system development 2. Developing or updating mental health policies and legislation 3. Mobilising the shift from mental hospitals/psychiatric hospitals to a system based on general hospitals and community mental health services 4. Improve the use and effectiveness of mechanisms to monitor the implementation of mental health reform 5. Promote the use of relevant EU instruments 111 IX. ANNEXES Annex 1. Swot analysis for 9 wp5 participanting countries Annex 2. Good practices EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Community-based mental health care is a well-recognized approach to addressing effectively and efficiently the challenges associated with the burden of mental disorders and promotion of mental health in the population. A strategy to shift away from a traditional model of care based on large psychiatric institutions to more community-based services is therefore essential. There are today many reasons why the development of community-based mental health services is central to improving mental health systems. Community care contributes to improved access to services, enables people with mental disorders to maintain family relationships, friendships, and employment while receiving treatment, so facilitating early treatment and psychosocial rehabilitation1. Community mental health care is associated with continuity of care, greater user satisfaction, increased adherence to treatment, better protection of human rights, and prevention of stigmatisation2. Community mental health care aids the establishment of a structured collaboration with primary health care services, which plays an important role in the identification and treatment of people with mental disorders. These collaborative models of care are particularly effective in the treatment of people with mental and physical co-morbidities3,4. Under the framework of the EU Joint Action on Mental Health and Wellbeing, key stakeholders from participating countries (Austria, Bulgaria, Estonia, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Portugal, Spain and UK) worked together with representatives of relevant European mental health organisations to develop a framework for action on community-based and socially inclusive approaches to mental health. Their work gave a special emphasis to the transition from institutional to community-based care for people with severe mental disorders, and was part of a commonly endorsed action framework on mental health and wellbeing in Europe. The specific objectives of the workgroup were: 1-analysing the situation of community-based and socially-inclusive approaches to mental health in participating countries, as well as in EU countries at large; 2- mapping the scientific evidence, best practices and the available technical resources relevant for the implementation of community-based and socially-inclusive approaches to mental health in Europe; 3- developing recommendations for action at EU-level and in Member States for this work package; 4- supporting the engagement and commitment of Member States and other stakeholders in effective action to develop community-based and socially-inclusive approaches to mental health in Europe. The methods used included a literature review, the analysis of existing data on a selected set of indicators related with the transition to community-based care in EU, the analysis of original and more extensive data related to this process collected in the nine countries participating in the workgroup with the support of a questionnaire specifically developed for this purpose, a SWOT analysis (to evaluate achievements, barriers and challenges in MS) in six participating countries, and the selection and description of good practices. MENTAL HEALTH AND WELLBEING REPORT | 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY What is the situation in Europe? Across Europe, much effort has been made over recent decades to shift away from institutional to community-based mental health care. However, despite all these efforts, much more has still to be done if we want to provide accessible, effective and social inclusive mental health care to all people with severe mental disorders in Europe. The key findings of this project show that: Deinstitutionalisation and the development of community-based care is accepted by more than half of EU countries as a major goal of their mental health policies. Many countries have developed or initiated some type of mental health reform in the last few decades. Most countries have undergone important transformations in psychiatric hospitals but for a number of countries these hospitals continue to play a central role in mental health systems and consume the vast majority of resources allocated to mental health care. The reduction of beds in mental hospitals/psychiatric hospitals, and the transfer of patients to community services and residential facilities have played a key role in deinstitutionalisation, followed by the veto of new admissions. The involvement of different stakeholders in the planning of deinstitutionalisation has gradually increased in the last 15 years. Despite many significant advances in the development of community care across Europe, community- based services networks have only partially been developed in most countries, with many not introducing timely transfers from traditional services to community-based systems of mental health care. Beds in community-based facilities, including general hospitals, have become an important part of the mental health systems in most of the EU countries. Although in a less systematic way, residential facilities in the community have also increased significantly across many EU countries. Few EU countries offer home treatment and community-based rehabilitation. Primary mental health care also remains very limited in many countries, particularly in relation to severe mental disorders. According to stakeholders perception, the highest levels of achievement were found in the development
Recommended publications
  • The Stigma of Psychosis: Lived Experience, Psychological Consequences and Strategies
    The stigma of psychosis: lived experience, psychological consequences and strategies to overcome stigma A thesis submitted to the University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences 2013 Melissa Wardle School of Psychological Sciences Contents List of Tables.............................................................................................................. 10 List of Figures ............................................................................................................ 11 List of appendices ...................................................................................................... 11 List of abbreviations ................................................................................................... 12 Abstract ...................................................................................................................... 14 Declaration ................................................................................................................. 15 Data ............................................................................................................................ 15 Published work ........................................................................................................... 15 Collaborators and authorship ..................................................................................... 15 Analysis and write up ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Deinstitutionalization and Reinstitutionalization
    Author's personal copy MOVING OUT OF THE ASYLUM with a degree of architectural splendour and with good living Deinstitutionalization and conditions. reinstitutionalization: major Urbanization: during industrialization, families moved from rural environments to large towns which were growing rapidly. changes in the provision of In the new towns they no longer had the material means to look after and care for a mentally ill family member, so asylums mental healthcare stepped in to provide accommodation and basic care. Walid Fakhoury Location: psychiatrists assumed that urbanization would lead Stefan Priebe to increased morbidity and an increase in mental illness. Sub- sequently, removing patients from urban environments was seen as a therapeutic intervention, and almost all asylums were built in leafy and pleasant areas outside the industrialized towns. Abstract The care of patients with mental illness has undergone major changes Morality: Victorian life was ruled by strict moral codes, and men- over the last two centuries. In the 19th century, large asylums were tally ill people with bizarre and odd behaviour were perceived as built throughout industrialized countries to provide care for patients inconsistent with the ideal of elegant and morally correct town with mental illness. Conditions in these asylums worsened during the life. As people with mental illness were more widely visible in 20th century and since the 1950s an increasing deinstitutionaliza- towns than they had been when living within large rural families, tion movement has resulted in their closure. Various services in the there was a tendency to remove them to the remote locations community were established to provide an alternative form of care.
    [Show full text]
  • Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry Fellowship
    Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry Fellowship Name of institution: McGill University Health Center Type of Fellowship: Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry Number of fellowship positions requested: 1-2 Duration of Fellowship: 1 year Hospitals involved in training: McGill University Health Center, including Montreal General, Glen - Royal Victoria, Montreal Chest Institute, and Montreal Neurological Hospital Sites Time spent by the fellow in each institution: MGH- 25% Glen - 65% MNH- 10% Mission of Fellowship: This Clinical Fellowship year is intended to teach advanced skills in C/L psychiatry. Its purpose is to train academic leaders in C/L psychiatry, stimulate interest in academic work in the field and provide the administrative skills required for the development of C/L services at other institutions. Fellowship Program Director: Dr. Annette Granich Names of Teaching Faculty: The teaching faculty comprises M-J. Brouillette, S. Ducharme, G. Galbaud du Fort, A. Granich, L. Hoffman, T. Nguyen, L. Pinard, Z. Prelevic, L. Tourian, A. Wilner. This is an expert group of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatrists with an average of 15 years of clinical experience in the field. Roles of Teaching Faculty: Supervising psychiatrists will review clinical cases with the fellow and assess his/her skills specific to interviewing and interacting in the medical setting, including diagnostic and therapeutic skills, clinical judgment, communication effectiveness with other professionals, and advocacy for patients so as to ensure optimal care delivery. Role of Project Supervisors: Supervisors will guide and oversee the fellow in the preparation and completion of a project to be submitted for publication, in their area of specialized interest and expertise. They will ensure comprehensive exposure to and provide supervision for clinical experience in their area of subspecialty.
    [Show full text]
  • New Eating Disorder Service
    ORIGINAL PAPERS New eating disorder service Harry R, Millar Aims and method The paper describes the first three the Grampian area. We welcome direct enqui years experience of a new out-patient eating disorder ries from patients, relatives and friends, but service for adults. Clinical data on referrals using strongly encourage referral through the GP and standardised assessments are presented. if the GP is not involved a psychiatrist sees the Results The referral rate rapidly rose to over 200 referral. patients per annum. Forty-nine per cent of referrals We wish to enable generalist colleagues to were bulimic disorders and 26% had either anorexia continue seeing patients and offer a consul nervosa or atypical anorexia nervosa. Seventy per cent tative service to them but some managers were directly referred by general practitioners. seemed to believe that we should see all eating Clinical implications The creation of a specialist disorder patients. We had to explain that this eating disorder service quickly leads to a high referral is not logistically possible and not clinically rate suggesting a previously unmet need. A service necessary. based on assessment and treatment by nurse therapists is acceptable and feasible with appropriate training and support from psychiatry, clinical psychology and Assessment dietetics. Expectations of a specialist service include We have tried to provide a "comprehensive teaching, consultation, research and audit as well as multidimensional assessment" as recommended the provision of direct clinical care. by the American Psychiatric Association (1993). A Royal College of Psychiatrists (1992) report This includes two to three sessions with the recommends that across the country "a con primary therapist, a nutritional assessment by sultant-led local service for eating disorders the dietician, a physical assessment by a junior should be established, together with appropriate doctor and, if indicated, a psychiatric assess non-medial support." In 1994, an adult out ment by the consultant.
    [Show full text]
  • Review: Over 25% of People with Schizophrenia, Psychoses, Or Severe Mental Disorders Fail to Adhere to Treatment Programmes Nose M, Barbui C, Gray R, Et Al
    Evid Based Mental Health: first published as 10.1136/ebmh.7.2.40 on 23 April 2004. Downloaded from 40 THERAPEUTICS Review: over 25% of people with schizophrenia, psychoses, or severe mental disorders fail to adhere to treatment programmes Nose M, Barbui C, Gray R, et al. Clinical interventions for treatment non-adherence in psychosis: meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry 2003;183:197–206. ............................................................................................................................... Q What proportion of people with psychosis fail to adhere to treatment programmes? METHODS charged patients); study design, and length of follow up. The majority of studies were performed in the United States which may limit the generalisability of results. Design: Systematic review with meta-analysis. Data sources: MEDLINE and PsycINFO from January 1980; hand searches of reference lists and previous systematic reviews. Commentary Study selection and analysis: Inclusion criteria: people with his carefully performed meta-analysis focuses on a clinically essential schizophrenia, psychoses, or severe mental disorders; participant issue in the treatment of schizophrenia and other psychotic recruitment in a psychiatric setting and treatment adherence as a T disorders. Despite the rapid development of antipsychotic medica- primary outcome measure. Exclusions: studies set in general tions in the last decade, it is as important as ever to assess the value of medical wards and emergency rooms, studies on compulsory psychosocial interventions tailored for psychoses. In addition, after treatment, and studies examining adherence to initial psychiatric deinstitutionalisation in psychiatry, adherence to both medication and appointments. regular appointments has become crucial for positive outcome during maintenance treatment. The implementation of integrative psychoeduca- Outcomes: Proportion of people failing to adhere to treatment programmes (either medication or scheduled appointments).
    [Show full text]
  • Are Four Centuries of Systemic Segregation Coming to an End?
    EOTVOS LORAND UNIVERSITY European Master’s Degree in Human Rights and Democratization 2016/2017 Are Four Centuries of Systemic Segregation Coming to an End? A socio-historical analysis of custodial care with case studies on deinstitutionalisation of children with disabilities in Bulgaria and Serbia. Author: Lazar Stefanović Supervisor: prof. Dr. Katalin Tausz ABSTRACT This study encompasses the phenomenon of institutionalisation of persons with mental disabilities in a holistic manner, from its rise to the fall as the only mainstream form of care for this group. The phenomenon of the period of “great confinement” with regards to persons with mental disorders determined the later development of custodial care systems; hence my thesis examines wrongness of the inveteracy of punitive and control oriented care that was long taken for granted. The perception of mental disorders progressed significantly after the aforementioned period; still today we are able to detect worryingly outdated approaches to mental disability as well as some features of the custodial care that were present a few centuries ago. A significant breakthrough happened with introduction of somewhat vague concept of dignity that allowed theorists and lawmakers to further develop understanding of this concept and incorporate it in international legal instruments. The position of dignity is examined with regards to realization of the rights of persons with mental disabilities and understanding the importance of autonomy as a prerequisite for dignified life. Ultimately, deinstitutionalisation is a tool by which the society loosens the control established upon the persons with mental disorders a long time ago. The case studies focus on the processes of deinstitutionalisation of children with disabilities in Bulgaria and Serbia.
    [Show full text]
  • Liaison Psychiatry Services - Guidance
    ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Liaison Psychiatry Services - Guidance 1st edition, February 2014 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Title: Liaison Psychiatry Services - Guidance ! Edition: 1st edition ! Date: February 2014 ! URL: http://mentalhealthpartnerships.com/resource/liaison-psychiatry-services- guidance/ ! Commissioners: Strategic Clinical Network for Mental Health, Dementia and Neurological Conditions South West ! Editors: Dr Peter Aitken, Dr Sarah Robens, Tobit Emmens Devon Partnership NHS Trust, Dryden Road, Wonford House, Exeter, EX2 5AF. www.devonpartnership.nhs.uk ! ! Contents ! Preface 2 With thanks and appreciation 3 What people told us they wanted from the Guidance 4 Introduction 6 Connecting liaison psychiatry services with other pathways of care 6 Models of hospital based liaison psychiatry services for which there is evidence of cost and quality outcome benefits 8 Effective liaison psychiatry services 9 Where liaison psychiatry services can impact 11 Key references 12 !1 Preface ! This guidance provides advice on commissioning liaison psychiatry services, specifying minimum and optimum service specifications, costs and quality outcome measures. It was commissioned by the Strategic Clinical Network for Mental Health, Dementia and Neurological Conditions South West. ! The guidance is provided as four related documents, each with increasing levels of detail: ! • Liaison Psychiatry Services - Guidance - sets out the key considerations to be made when commissioning liaison psychiatry services. • An Evidence Base for Liaison Psychiatry - Guidance - sets out the evidence gathered from lay people, professionals, commissioners and the literature about what is needed from liaison psychiatry services. • Developing Models for Liaison Psychiatry Services - Guidance - provides the technical information needed for commissioning liaison psychiatry services. • Model Service Specifications for Liaison Psychiatry Services - sets out exemplar service specifications for four models of liaison psychiatry.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Jennifer Kruse, MD Board-Certified in Psychiatry
    California Medical Evaluators 11620 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 340 Los Angeles, CA 90025 Phone: 888.853.7944 Fax: 213.478.0550 [email protected] Dr. Jennifer Kruse , MD Board-Certified in Psychiatry Board-certified psychiatrist with more than 9 years of clinical expertise. EDUCATION • UCLA Clinical Pharmacology Training Program (2016-2017) T32 Research Fellowship Award • CTSI Training Program in Translational Science (2015-2017) Track 2 Certificate Program • Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (2013-2014) Psychosomatic Medicine Fellowship • Semel Institute for Neuroscience & Human Behavior, UCLA (2009-2013) Psychiatric Residency • Mayo Medical School, Mayo Clinic (2005-2009) Doctor of Medicine • University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA (2001-2005) Bachelor of Arts, Spanish, with Honors and Highest Distinction PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE • Psychiatrist, Transitional Age Youth, Full Service Partnership – San Fernando Valley Community Mental Health Center, Inc., Van Nuys, CA (2011-2013) ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS • Health Sciences Assistant Clinical Professor - Dept. of Psychiatry, UCLA (2015-present) • Supervising Faculty - Mood Disorders Clinic, Dept. of Psychiatry, UCLA (2015-present) • Associate Director of Consultation/Liaison Psychiatry – RRUMC, UCLA (2014-present) • Wilder Scholar – UCLA (2014-present) • Clinical Instructor – Department of Psychiatry, UCLA (2014-2015) • Staff Associate Physician – UCLA (2013-2014) LICENSURE AND CERTIFICATION • California State Medical License (2010) • Board-Certified, American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology (2013) • Psychosomatic
    [Show full text]
  • Japan Trails Other Countries in 'Deinstitutionalisation', but There Are
    Japan trails other countries in ‘deinstitutionalisation’, but there are signs of progress, says OECD Japan’s mental health system stands out amongst OECD countries for all the wrong reasons: high numbers of psychiatric beds and a high suicide rate. However, this hides a more positive story, according to the OECD’s Making Mental Health Count report. Japan is making good progress in reforming the mental health system, and introducing more patient-centred care. Falling numbers of psychiatric beds and a more stable suicide rate are testament to a recent commitment to change. Hospital care still dominant, but clear signs of change In almost all OECD countries, the dominant trend has been ‘deinstitutionalisation’ – the shifting of care away from hospitals and towards the community. This shift aims to promote patient-centred treatment. Patients often prefer care provided in the community to long hospital stays. Japan has lagged behind the deinstitutionalisation trend, and still has the highest number of psychiatric beds in the OECD, with 269 beds compared to the OECD average of 68. It is important to note that some of these beds are ‘long-stay beds’, which might not be reported as psychiatric beds in other OECD countries. Nonetheless, there is reason to believe that patients in long-stay beds could be effectively cared for in their homes or in the community. Figure 1. Psychiatric beds per 100 000 population, 2011 or nearest year 300 269 250 200 175 150 139 121 101 population 92 89 88 100 85 83 80 78 77 71 68 65 65 63 57 55 54 54 48 47 45 50 39 39 35 33 25 20 14 10 6 4 Psychiatric perbeds000care 100Psychiatric 0 Italy Chile Israel Spain Korea OECD Turkey Ireland France Austria Poland Mexico Iceland Japan1 Greece Finland Estonia Norway Canada Belgium Sweden Portugal Hungary Slovenia Australia Denmark Germany Switzerland Luxembourg New Zealand New Netherlands2 United States United Czech Republic Czech United Kingdom United Slovak Republic Slovak 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines for the BC Eating Disorders Continuum of Services September 1, 2012
    CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES for the BC EATING DISORDERS CONTINUUM OF SERVICES SEPTEMBER 1, 2012 < ONLY REVERSE OUT OF PHC BLUE, BLACK AND PHC OCHRE Ministry of Health (Project Leader) Gerrit van der Leer, MSW, Director, Mental Health and Addictions Authors Josie Geller, PhD, R. Psych, Director of Research, Eating Disorders Program, Providence Health Care. Associate Professor, Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia. Shawna Goodrich, MSW, Former Clinical Director, Eating Disorders Program, Providence Health Care Kathy Chan, MA, Graduate Student, University of Ottawa Sarah Cockell, PhD, R. Psych, Psychologist, Heart Centre, Providence Health Care Suja Srikameswaran, PhD., R. Psych, Professional Practice Leader, Psychology, Providence Health Care, Outpatient Psychologist, Eating Disorders Program, SPH, Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia Provincial Advisory Committee Connie Coniglio, EdD, Clinical Director, Provincial Specialized Eating Disorder Program for Children and Adolescents, BC Children’s Hospital. Pei Yoong Lam, MD, FRACP, Assistant Clinical professor, Division of Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of BC. Provincial Specialized Eating Disorders Program for Children and Adolescents, BC Children’s Hospital. Kim Williams, RD, Dietician, Eating Disorders Program, Providence Health Care Randy Murray, Practice Lead, Mental Health and Substance Use, Interior Health Shelagh Bouttell, MSc RD, Nutrition Therapist, Fraser South Eating Disorder Program,
    [Show full text]
  • Nova University of Lisbon Faculty of Medical Sciences
    Nova University of Lisbon Faculty of Medical Sciences Consultation-Liaison Services in Aarhus: A Service Organization Proposal by Bárbara Patricia da Costa Lopes Félix Master's dissertation in Mental Health Policy and Services Supervisor: Graça Cardoso, MD, PhD Co-Supervisor: Lisbeth Uhrskov, MD, PhD, MSc.(Econ) 2016 Contents Abstract 3 Acknowledgments 6 Part I Background 7 1 Background and literature review 8 1.1 The case for Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry 8 1.2 Rationale and evidence for Consultation-Liaison Services 10 1.3 Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry in USA and Europe 14 1.4 The state of the art in Denmark 18 Part II Personal Contribution 21 2 Proposal to establish a Consultation-Liaison team in Aarhus 22 2.1 Planning Consultation-Liaison psychiatric services 22 2.1.1 Mental health services organization in the Region Midt and in Aarhus 24 2.1.2 Existing policies, plans and reports 30 2.1.3 Existing Consultation-Liaison psychiatry services in Aarhus 33 2.1.4 Descriptive analysis of one-year referrals to acute and scheduled consultation visits at the Psychiatric Emergency Room in Aarhus 38 2.1.5 Needs and demands 42 2.2 The future Consultation-Liaison psychiatry team in Aarhus 45 2.3 Expected benefits and barriers 49 Part III 52 3 Conclusions 53 References 55 2 Abstract Several programs and services' organizations are to be found in the context of Consultation- Liaison (C-L) psychiatry around the world. In Denmark, the links between psychiatry and the other specialities are organized in different ways. In Aarhus, elective C-L services are available twice a week to patients admitted to the general hospital and these consultations are provided by 2 consultant psychiatrists who work daily in the emergency psychiatric department.
    [Show full text]
  • BEATVIC, a Body-Oriented Resilience Training with Elements of Kickboxing for Individuals with a Psychotic Disorder: Study Protocol of a Multi-Center RCT Elisabeth C
    van der Stouwe et al. BMC Psychiatry (2016) 16:227 DOI 10.1186/s12888-016-0918-2 STUDYPROTOCOL Open Access BEATVIC, a body-oriented resilience training with elements of kickboxing for individuals with a psychotic disorder: study protocol of a multi-center RCT Elisabeth C. D. van der Stouwe1,2*, Bertine de Vries3, André Aleman1,3, Johan Arends4, Clement Waarheid4, Aniek Meerdink4, Erwin van der Helm5, Jooske T. van Busschbach2,6 and Gerdina H. M. Pijnenborg1,2,3,4 Abstract Background: Individuals with a psychotic disorder are at an increased risk of becoming victim of a crime or other forms of aggression. Research has revealed several possible risk factors (e.g. impaired social cognition, aggression regulation problems, assertiveness, self-stigma, self-esteem) for victimization in patients with a psychotic disorder. To address these risk factors and prevent victimization, we developed a body-oriented resilience training with elements of kickboxing: BEATVIC. The present study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention. Methods/Design: Seven mental health institutions in the Netherlands will participate in this study. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the BEATVIC training or the control condition: social activation. Follow-ups are at 6, 18 and 30 months. Short term effects on risk factors for victimization will be examined, since these are direct targets of the intervention and are thought to be mediators of victimization, the primary outcome of the intervention. The effect on victimization will be investigated at follow-up. In a subgroup of patients, fMRI scans will be made before and after the intervention period in order to assess potential neural changes associated with the effects of the training.
    [Show full text]