Atorvastatin and Micronized Fenofibrate Alone and In

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Atorvastatin and Micronized Fenofibrate Alone and In Emerging Treatment and Technologies ORIGINAL ARTICLE Atorvastatin and Micronized Fenofibrate Alone and in Combination in Type 2 Diabetes With Combined Hyperlipidemia 1 3 VASILIOS G. ATHYROS, MD DIMOKRITOS S. DEMITRIADIS, MD ombined hyperlipidemia (CHL), a 2 ATHANASIOS A. PAPAGEORGIOU, MD ATHANASIOS G. KONTOPOULOS, MD, FACC, highly atherogenic lipid disorder 1 3 VALASIA V. ATHYROU, BSC FESC C characterized by increased LDL cho- lesterol, elevated triglycerides (TGs), and low HDL cholesterol, is not rare in pa- tients with type 2 diabetes (1). Moreover, metabolic abnormalities, such as predom- OBJECTIVE — This study evaluated the effect of a atorvastatin-fenofibrate combination on inance of small dense LDL particles (2) lipid profile, in comparison to each drug alone, in patients with type 2 diabetes and combined hyperlipidemia (CHL). and increased glycation of LDL (3), raise the atherogenic risk in these patients. Gly- RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS — A total of 120 consecutive patients, who cemic control appears to improve but not were free of coronary artery disease (CAD) at entry, were studied for a period of 24 weeks. These normalize these abnormalities (4). Statins patients were randomly assigned to atorvastatin (20 mg/day, n ϭ 40), micronized fenofibrate or fibrates can be used in this setting. St- (200 mg/day, n ϭ 40), or a combination of both (atorvastatin 20 mg/day plus fenofibrate 200 atins have been shown to reduce athero- mg/day, n ϭ 40). The effect of treatment on LDL cholesterol, triglycerides (TGs), HDL choles- sclerosis-related morbidity and mortality terol, apolipoprotein A-I and B, lipoprotein(a), and plasma fibrinogen (PF) was recorded. More- in patients with diabetes (5,6). On the over, the percentage of patients that reached the American Diabetes Association treatment goals and the estimated CAD risk status were calculated. other hand, fibrates are drugs that can de- crease TG concentrations and elevate RESULTS — No patient was withdrawn from the study because of side effects. The atorva- HDL cholesterol, thus reducing cardio- statin-fenofibrate combination reduced total cholesterol by 37%, LDL cholesterol by 46%, TGs vascular morbidity and mortality (7,8). by 50%, and PF by 20%, whereas it increased HDL cholesterol by 22% (P Ͻ 0.0001 for all). Recent studies (9,10) showed that statin These changes were significantly better than those of both monotherapies. Of the patients on or fibrate monotherapies can improve the drug combination, 97.5% reached the LDL cholesterol treatment goal of Ͻ100 mg/dl, 100% lipid profile in patients with type 2 diabe- reached the desirable TG levels of Ͻ200 mg/dl, and 60% reached the optimal HDL cholesterol Ͼ tes and CHL; however, these affect differ- levels of 45 mg/dl. These rates were significantly higher than those of both monotherapies. ent aspects of lipoprotein (LP) Combined treatment reduced the 10-year probability for myocardial infarction from 21.6 to 4.2%. metabolism. Hence, it is difficult to mod- ify the lipid profile of patients with type 2 CONCLUSIONS — The atorvastatin-fenofibrate combination has a highly beneficial effect diabetes and CHL using monotherapy on all lipid parameters and PF in patients with type 2 diabetes and CHL. It improved patients’ with either a statin or a fibrate, according CAD risk status significantly more than each drug alone. to the recent suggestions of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) (11). Diabetes Care 25:1198–1202, 2002 An effective therapeutic approach of CHL in nondiabetic patients is a statin- fibrate combination (12–19). This regi- men has not been widely adopted because of the concern about side effects, mainly ●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●● myopathy, reported with the lovastatin- gemfibrozil combination (20). This has From the 1Lipid Out-patient Clinic, Aristotelian University, Hippocration Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece; the 2Second Propedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, Aristotelian University, Hippocration Hospital not been confirmed by studies using other Thessaloniki, Greece; and the 3Division of Cardiology, Aristotelian University, Hippocration Hospital, Thes- statin-fibrate combinations (12–19). The saloniki, Greece. recently reported problems with cerivas- Address correspondence and reprint requests to Vasilios G. Athyros, MD, 15 Marmara St., Thessaloniki, tatin, when combined with gemfibrozil, 551 32, Greece. E-mail: [email protected]. Received for publication 10 November 2001 and accepted in revised form 2 March 2002. seem to be related mainly to the toxicity of Abbreviations: ADA, American Diabetes Association; apo, apolipoprotein; BIP, Bezafibrate Infarction cerivastatin, because most deaths due to Prevention; CAD, coronary artery disease; CARDS, Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study; CHL, com- myopathy-rhabdomyolysis reported in bined hyperlipidemia; CK, creatine kinase; Lp, lipoprotein; FIELD, Fenofibrate Intervention and Event the U.S. were associated with mono- Lowering in Diabetes; PF, plasma fibrinogen; 4S, Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study; TC, total cho- lesterol; TG, triglyceride; VA-HIT, Veterans Affairs High-Density Lipoprotein Intervention Trial. therapy rather than with combination A table elsewhere in this issue shows conventional and Syste`me International (SI) units and conversion therapy. factors for many substances. The present open-label prospective 1198 DIABETES CARE, VOLUME 25, NUMBER 7, JULY 2002 Athyros and Associates Table 1—Demographic characteristics and baseline values of measured parameters of the Statistics patients with type 2 diabetes and combined hyperlipidemia in the three treatment groups Results are reported as the means Ϯ SD. ANOVA, with 95% CIs, was used to com- Atorvastatin Fenofibrate Combination pare values within and between the treat- group group group ment groups. Differences were considered to be significant at P Ͻ 0.05. Mean per- n 40 40 40 cent changes of the LP and apo values Sex (M/F) 23/17 22/18 23/17 were also calculated. For all forms of sta- Age (years) 57 (44–67) 58 (48–69) 58 (50–68) tistical analysis, SPSS version 8.0 (SPSS, Hypoglycemic treatment (oral/insulin) 16/24 18/22 17/23 Chicago, IL) was used. Ϯ Ϯ Ϯ HbA1c (%) 8.1 0.2 8.0 0.3 8.1 0.2 Duration of diabetes (years) 8.6 Ϯ 1.6 8.9 Ϯ 1.8 8.5 Ϯ 1.6 RESULTS — All 120 patients con- Data are n, median (range), or means Ϯ 1 SD. cluded the study: 68 men and 52 women, with an age range of 44–69 years (median 58). At baseline, there were no significant randomized parallel study was under- combination of both (atorvastatin 20 mg/ differences in the demographic character- taken to investigate the hypothesis that day plus micronized fenofibrate 200 mg/ istics of the three treatment groups (Table combination therapy with atorvastatin day, n ϭ 40). Lipid profile assessment as 1). and micronized fenofibrate will be more well as physical and laboratory investiga- effective than each drug alone in tackling tion for drug-induced adverse effects Adverse effects multiple lipid coronary artery disease were performed every month. Hypogly- No significant adverse events were re- (CAD) risk factors in patients with type 2 cemic or other concurrent treatments re- corded. There was a nonsignificant in- diabetes and CHL. mained unchanged throughout the study. crease in serum transaminase values in patients on combination treatment. These RESEARCH DESIGN AND remained under the threefold level of the METHODS — The study included Assessments upper normal limit. No patient presented 120 consecutive patients with type 2 dia- After an overnight fast, TC, TG, and uric myalgia or creatine kinase (CK) levels Ͼ betes and CHL, who were free of CAD at acid were assessed by an Olympus AU 10-fold from pretreatment values. CK baseline, with fairly adequate glycemic 560 autoanalyzer, using respective re- was increased with combination therapy control. The inclusion criteria were no agents (Olympus Diagnostica, Clare, Ire- at a higher level than with both mono- previous hypolipidemic treatment, HbA1c therapies, but it remained within the nor- Ͻ land). LDL cholesterol was calculated by 8.5%, and laboratory findings of CHL. the Friedewald formula (in mg/dl) [LDL mal range. No patient was withdrawn CHL was defined as total cholesterol (TC) cholesterol ϭ TC Ϫ (TG/5 ϩ HDL cho- from the study because of side effects. Ͼ220 mg/dl (5.7 mmol/l), LDL choles- Ͼ lesterol)]. Apo B and A-I values were as- terol 130 mg/dl (3.4 mmol/l), TG from sessed by the immunoprecipitin method Glycemic control and lipid 200 mg/dl (2.3 mmol/l) to 399 mg/dl (4.5 parameters with the Technicon RA-1000 autoana- mmol/l), HDL cholesterol Ͻ40 mg/dl HbA remained unchanged throughout lyzer (Technicon-Swords, Dublin, Ire- 1c (1.04 mmol/l), and apolipoprotein (apo) the study in all groups. Combined treat- land), using the apo B and apo A-I B Ͼ150 mg/dl. Patients were on the Na- ment had a beneficial effect on all lipid reagents, respectively (Incstar, Stillwater, tional Cholesterol Expert Panel step 2 hy- parameters. It reduced TC and LDL cho- polipidemic diet for 6 weeks, during MN). Lp(a) levels were measured using a lesterol significantly more than atorvasta- which time they received a placebo tablet monoclonal anti–Lp(a) antibody tech- tin, whereas it had a better effect on TG daily. After that, if they still met the inclu- nique and enzyme-linked immunoassay and HDL cholesterol than micronized fe- sion criteria, they continued participating (Terumo Medical, Elkron, MD). Plasma nofibrate (Table 2). Lp(a) levels were not in the study. Fertile women were ex- fibrinogen (PF) was assessed with the affected by all three regimens. cluded. In all patients, normal liver and Clauss method, using the fibrin titer test renal function was established. The study Fibrindex (Ortho Diagnostic, Raritan, PF and uric acid protocol received ethical approval, and NJ). Atorvastatin had a neutral effect on PF informed consent was obtained by all par- levels. Fenofibrate and drug combination ticipants before enrolment.
Recommended publications
  • Effects of Pitavastatin, Atorvastatin, and Rosuvastatin on the Risk Of
    biomedicines Article Effects of Pitavastatin, Atorvastatin, and Rosuvastatin on the Risk of New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus: A Single-Center Cohort Study Wei-Ting Liu 1, Chin Lin 2,3,4, Min-Chien Tsai 5, Cheng-Chung Cheng 6, Sy-Jou Chen 7,8, Jun-Ting Liou 6 , Wei-Shiang Lin 6, Shu-Meng Cheng 6, Chin-Sheng Lin 6,* and Tien-Ping Tsao 6,9,* 1 Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 11490, Taiwan; [email protected] 2 School of Public Health, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 11490, Taiwan; [email protected] 3 School of Medicine, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 11490, Taiwan 4 Graduate Institute of Life Sciences, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 11490, Taiwan, 5 Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Graduate Institute of Physiology, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 11490, Taiwan; [email protected] 6 Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 11490, Taiwan; [email protected] (C.-C.C.); [email protected] (J.-T.L.); [email protected] (W.-S.L.); [email protected] (S.-M.C.) 7 Department of Emergency Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 11490, Taiwan; [email protected] 8 Graduate Institute of Injury Prevention and Control, College of Public Health and Nutrition, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan 9 Division of Cardiology, Cheng Hsin General Hospital, Taipei 11220, Taiwan * Correspondence: [email protected] (C.-S.L.); [email protected] (T.-P.T.); Tel.: +886-2-6601-2656 (C.-S.L.); +886-2-2826-4400 (T.-P.T.) Received: 25 October 2020; Accepted: 11 November 2020; Published: 13 November 2020 Abstract: Statins constitute the mainstay treatment for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, which is associated with the risk of new-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM).
    [Show full text]
  • Nustendi, INN-Bempedoic Acid, Ezetimibe
    Summary of risk management plan for Nustendi (Bempedoic acid/Ezetimibe) This is a summary of the risk management plan (RMP) for Nustendi. The RMP details important risks of Nustendi, how these risks can be minimized, and how more information will be obtained about Nustendi's risks and uncertainties (missing information). Nustendi's summary of product characteristics (SmPC) and its package leaflet give essential information to healthcare professionals and patients on how Nustendi should be used. This summary of the RMP for Nustendi should be read in the context of all this information, including the assessment report of the evaluation and its plain-language summary, all which is part of the European Public Assessment Report (EPAR). Important new concerns or changes to the current ones will be included in updates of Nustendi's RMP. I. The Medicine and What It Is Used For Nustendi is authorized for treatment of primary hypercholesterolemia in adults, as an adjunct to diet (see SmPC for the full indication). It contains bempedoic acid as the active substance and it is given by mouth. Further information about the evaluation of Nustendi’s benefits can be found in Nustendi’s EPAR, including in its plain-language summary, available on the EMA website, under the medicine’s webpage https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/nustendi II. Risks Associated With the Medicine and Activities to Minimize or Further Characterize the Risks Important risks of Nustendi, together with measures to minimize such risks and the proposed studies for learning
    [Show full text]
  • Atorvastatin Slows the Progression of Cardiac Remodeling in Mice with Pressure Overload and Inhibits Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Activation
    335 Hypertens Res Vol.31 (2008) No.2 p.335-344 Original Article Atorvastatin Slows the Progression of Cardiac Remodeling in Mice with Pressure Overload and Inhibits Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Activation Yulin LIAO1), Hui ZHAO2), Akiko OGAI1), Hisakazu KATO2), Masanori ASAKURA1), Jiyoong KIM1), Hiroshi ASANUMA1), Tetsuo MINAMINO2), Seiji TAKASHIMA2), and Masafumi KITAKAZE1) The aim of this study was to investigate whether atorvastatin inhibits epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) activation in cardiomyocytes in vitro and slows the progression of cardiac remodeling induced by pressure overload in mice. Either atorvastatin (5 mg/kg/day) or vehicle was orally administered to male C57BL/6J mice with transverse aortic constriction (TAC). Physiological parameters were obtained by echocardiography or left ventricular (LV) catheterization, and morphological and molecular parameters of the heart were also examined. Furthermore, cultured neonatal rat cardiomyocytes were studied to clarify the underlying mechanisms. Four weeks after TAC, atorvastatin reduced the heart/body weight and lung/body weight ratios (8.69±0.38 to 6.45±0.31 mg/g (p<0.001) and 10.89±0.68 to 6.61±0.39 mg/g (p<0.01) in TAC mice with and without atorvastatin, respectively). Decrease of LV end-diastolic pressure and the time con- stant of relaxation, increased fractional shortening, downregulation of a disintegrin and metalloproteinase (ADAM)12, ADAM17 and heparin-binding epidermal growth factor genes, and reduction of the activity of EGFR and extracellular signal–regulated kinase (ERK) were observed in the atorvastatin group. Phenyleph- rine-induced protein synthesis, phosphorylation of EGFR, and activation of ERK in neonatal rat cardiomyo- cytes were all inhibited by atorvastatin.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Generic Substitution on Refill Adherence to Statin Therapy: a Nationwide Population-Based Study Henrik Trusell1 and Karolina Andersson Sundell1,2*
    Trusell and Andersson Sundell BMC Health Services Research 2014, 14:626 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/14/626 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Effects of generic substitution on refill adherence to statin therapy: a nationwide population-based study Henrik Trusell1 and Karolina Andersson Sundell1,2* Abstract Background: Several countries have introduced generic substitution, but few studies have assessed its effect on refill adherence. This study aimed to analyse whether generic substitution influences refill adherence to statin treatment. Methods: Between 1 July 2006 and 30 June 2007, new users of simvastatin (n = 108,806) and atorvastatin (n = 7,464) were identified in the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register . The present study included atorvastatin users as an unexposed control group because atorvastatin was patent-protected and thus not substitutable. We assessed refill adherence using continuous measure of medication acquisition (CMA). To control for potential confounders, we used analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). Differences in CMA associated with generic substitution and generic substitution at first-time statin purchase were analysed. Results: Nine of ten simvastatin users were exposed to generic substitution during the study period, and their adherence rate was higher than that of patients without substitution [84.6% (95% CI 83.5-85.6) versus 59.9% (95% CI 58.4-61.4), p < 0.001]. CMA was higher with increasing age (60–69 years 16.7%, p < 0.0001 and 70–79 years 17.8%, p < 0.0001, compared to 18–39 years) and secondary prevention (12.8%, p < 0.0001). CMA was lower among patients who were exposed to generic substitution upon initial purchase, compared to those who were exposed to a generic substitution subsequently [80.4% (95% CI 79.4-90.9) versus 89.8% (88.7-90.9), p < 0.001].
    [Show full text]
  • Bempedoic Acid) Tablets, for Oral Use Most Common (Incidence ≥ 2% and Greater Than Placebo) Adverse Reactions Initial U.S
    HIGHLIGHTS OF PRESCRIBING INFORMATION • Tendon Rupture: Tendon rupture has occurred. Discontinue NEXLETOL These highlights do not include all the information needed to use at the first sign of tendon rupture. Avoid NEXLETOL in patients who NEXLETOL™ safely and effectively. See full prescribing information have a history of tendon disorders or tendon rupture. (5.2) for NEXLETOL. --------------------------------ADVERSE REACTIONS----------------------------­ NEXLETOL (bempedoic acid) tablets, for oral use Most common (incidence ≥ 2% and greater than placebo) adverse reactions Initial U.S. Approval: 2020 are upper respiratory tract infection, muscle spasms, hyperuricemia, back pain, abdominal pain or discomfort, bronchitis, pain in extremity, anemia, ----------------------------INDICATIONS AND USAGE--------------------------­ and elevated liver enzymes. (6.1) NEXLETOL is an adenosine triphosphate-citrate lyase (ACL) inhibitor indicated as an adjunct to diet and maximally tolerated statin therapy for the To report SUSPECTED ADVERSE REACTIONS, contact Esperion at treatment of adults with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia or 833-377-7633 (833 ESPRMED) or FDA at 1-800-FDA-1088 or established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease who require additional www.fda.gov/medwatch. lowering of LDL-C. (1) --------------------------------DRUG INTERACTIONS----------------------------­ Limitations of Use: The effect of NEXLETOL on cardiovascular morbidity • Simvastatin: Avoid concomitant use of NEXLETOL with simvastatin and mortality has not been
    [Show full text]
  • Statins: Mechanism of Action and Effects
    J.Cell.Mol.Med. Vol 5, No 4, 2001 pp. 378-387 Review Statins: mechanism of action and effects Camelia Stancu, Anca Sima * "Nicolae Simionescu" Institute of Cellular Biology and Pathology, Bucharest, Romania Received: November 12, 2001; Accepted: December 5, 2001 • Introduction • Effects on • Classification of statins - cholesterol esterification and - How they are obtained its accumulation in macrophages - Liver metabolism - endothelial cell function - Physico-chemical properties - inflammatory process - Specific activity - proliferation, migration and • Mechanisms for the action of statins apoptosis of arterial smooth muscle cells - Mechanisms involving lipids - stability of the atherosclerotic plaque - Mechanisms involving intracellular - platelets activation signaling pathways - coagulation process • Beneficial effects of statins • Adverse effects of statins therapy • Conclusions Abstract The beneficial effects of statins are the result of their capacity to reduce cholesterol biosyntesis, mainly in the liver, where they are selectively distributed, as well as to the modulation of lipid metabolism, derived from their effect of inhibition upon HMG-CoA reductase. Statins have antiatherosclerotic effects, that positively correlate with the percent decrease in LDL cholesterol. In addition, they can exert antiatherosclerotic effects independently of their hypolipidemic action. Because the mevalonate metabolism generates a series of isoprenoids vital for different cellular functions, from cholesterol synthesis to the control of cell growth and differentiation, HMG-CoA reductase inhibition has beneficial pleiotropic effects. Consequently, statins reduce significantly the incidence of coronary events, both in primary and secondary prevention, being the most efficient hypolipidemic compounds that have reduced the rate of mortality in coronary patients. Independent of their hypolipidemic properties, statins interfere with events involved in bone formation and impede tumor cell growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Lipobay, INN-Cerivastatin
    ANNEX I LIST OF THE NAMES, PHARMACEUTICAL FORM, STRENGTHS OF THE MEDICINAL PRODUCTS, ROUTE OF ADMINISTRATION, MARKETING AUTHORISATION HOLDERS, PACKAGING AND PACKAGE SIZES IN THE MEMBER STATES EMEA 2002 Reproduction and/or distribution of this document is authorised for non commercial purposes only provided the EMEA is acknowledged ANNEX I Marketing Authorisation Route of Member State Invented name Strength Pharmaceutical Form Packaging Package-size Holder administration Austria Bayer Austria Gesellschaft Lipobay 0.1 mg Film-coated tablet Oral use Blister 14, 20, 28, 30, G.m.b.H. 50, 98, 100 and Lerchenfelder Guertel 9-11 160 tablets A-1164 Wien Austria Bayer Austria Gesellschaft Lipobay 0.2 mg Film-coated tablet Oral use Blister 14, 20, 28, 30, G.m.b.H. 50, 98, 100 and Lerchenfelder Guertel 9-11 160 tablets A-1164 Wien Austria Bayer Austria Gesellschaft Lipobay 0.3 mg Film-coated tablet Oral use Blister 30 tablets G.m.b.H. Lerchenfelder Guertel 9-11 A-1164 Wien Austria Bayer Austria Gesellschaft Lipobay 0.4 mg Film-coated tablet Oral use Blister 30 tablets G.m.b.H. Lerchenfelder Guertel 9-11 A-1164 Wien Austria Bayer Austria Gesellschaft Liposterol 0.4 mg Film-coated tablet Oral use Blister 30 tablets G.m.b.H. Lerchenfelder Guertel 9-11 A-1164 Wien CPMP/811/02 1 EMEA 2002 Belgium Bayer NV Lipobay 0.1 mg Film-coated tablet Oral use Blister 14, 20, 28, 30, Louizalaan 143 50, 98, 100 and B-1050 Brussel 160 tablets Belgium Belgium Bayer NV Lipobay 0.2 mg Film-coated tablet Oral use Blister 14, 20, 28, 30, Louizalaan 143 50, 98, 100 and B-1050 Brussel 160 tablets Belgium Belgium Bayer NV Lipobay 0.3 mg Film-coated tablet Oral use Blister 14, 20, 28, 30, Louizalaan 143 50, 98, 100 and B-1050 Brussel 160 tablets Belgium Belgium Bayer NV Lipobay 0.4 mg Film-coated tablet Oral use Blister 14, 20, 28, 30, Louizalaan 143 50, 98, 100 and B-1050 Brussel 160 tablets Belgium Belgium Fournier Pharma S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Rosuvastatin
    Rosuvastatin Rosuvastatin Systematic (IUPAC) name (3R,5S,6E)-7-[4-(4-fluorophenyl)-2-(N-methylmethanesulfonamido)-6-(propan- 2-yl)pyrimidin-5-yl]-3,5-dihydroxyhept-6-enoic acid Clinical data Trade names Crestor AHFS/Drugs.com monograph MedlinePlus a603033 Pregnancy AU: D category US: X (Contraindicated) Legal status AU: Prescription Only (S4) UK: Prescription-only (POM) US: ℞-only Routes of oral administration Pharmacokinetic data Bioavailability 20%[1] Protein binding 88%[1] Metabolism Liver (CYP2C9(major) andCYP2C19-mediated; only minimally (~10%) metabolised)[1] Biological half-life 19 hours[1] Excretion Faeces (90%)[1] Identifiers CAS Registry 287714-41-4 Number ATC code C10AA07 PubChem CID: 446157 IUPHAR/BPS 2954 DrugBank DB01098 UNII 413KH5ZJ73 KEGG D01915 ChEBI CHEBI:38545 ChEMBL CHEMBL1496 PDB ligand ID FBI (PDBe, RCSB PDB) Chemical data Formula C22H28FN3O6S Molecular mass 481.539 SMILES[show] InChI[show] (what is this?) (verify) Rosuvastatin (marketed by AstraZenecaas Crestor) 10 mg tablets Rosuvastatin, marketed as Crestor, is a member of the drug class of statins, used in combination with exercise, diet, and weight-loss to treat high cholesterol and related conditions, and to prevent cardiovascular disease. It was developed by Shionogi. Crestor is the fourth- highest selling drug in the United States, accounting for approx. $5.2 billion in sales in 2013.[2] Contents [hide] 1Medical uses 2Side effects and contraindications 3Drug interactions 4Structure 5Mechanism of action 6Pharmacokinetics 7Indications and regulation
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmaceutical Appendix to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule
    Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States Basic Revision 3 (2021) Annotated for Statistical Reporting Purposes PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE HARMONIZED TARIFF SCHEDULE Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States Basic Revision 3 (2021) Annotated for Statistical Reporting Purposes PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE TARIFF SCHEDULE 2 Table 1. This table enumerates products described by International Non-proprietary Names INN which shall be entered free of duty under general note 13 to the tariff schedule. The Chemical Abstracts Service CAS registry numbers also set forth in this table are included to assist in the identification of the products concerned. For purposes of the tariff schedule, any references to a product enumerated in this table includes such product by whatever name known.
    [Show full text]
  • Frequently Asked Questions (Faqs) About LIPITOR and Cholesterol
    Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) About LIPITOR and Cholesterol Below are some FAQs that you may still have after visiting LIPITOR.com. Q: What are LIPITOR tablets? A: LIPITOR is a prescription medicine that lowers the LDL-C (“bad” cholesterol) and triglycerides in your blood. It can raise your HDL-C (“good” cholesterol) as well. LIPITOR is for adults and children over aged 10 years whose cholesterol does not come down enough with exercise and a low-fat diet alone. LIPITOR can lower the risk for heart attack, stroke, certain types of heart surgery, and chest pain in patients who have heart disease or risk factors for heart disease, such as: Age, smoking, high blood pressure, low HDL-C, heart disease in the family. LIPITOR can lower the risk for heart attack or stroke in patients with diabetes and risk factors such as: Eye problems, kidney problems, smoking, or high blood pressure. LIPITOR starts to work in about 2 weeks. Q: What are the possible side effects of LIPITOR? A: LIPITOR can cause serious side effects, which only a small number of people have experienced. Your doctor can monitor you for them. These side effects usually go away if your dose is lowered or LIPITOR is stopped. These serious side effects include: Muscle problems. LIPITOR can cause serious muscle problems that can lead to kidney problems, including kidney failure. You have a higher chance for muscle problems if you are taking certain other medicines with LIPITOR. Liver problems. Your doctor should do blood tests to check your liver before you start taking LIPITOR and if you have symptoms of liver problems while you take LIPITOR.
    [Show full text]
  • Rhoa Gtpase Inactivation by Statins Induces Osteosarcoma Cell Apoptosis by Inhibiting P42/P44- Mapks-Bcl-2 Signaling Independently of BMP-2 and Cell Differentiation
    Cell Death and Differentiation (2006) 13, 1845–1856 & 2006 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 1350-9047/06 $30.00 www.nature.com/cdd RhoA GTPase inactivation by statins induces osteosarcoma cell apoptosis by inhibiting p42/p44- MAPKs-Bcl-2 signaling independently of BMP-2 and cell differentiation O Fromigue´ 1, E Hay¨ 1, D Modrowski1, S Bouvet1, A Jacquel2, geranylgeranylpyrophosphate; HMG-CoA, 3-hydroxy 3-methyl- P Auberger2 and PJ Marie*,1 glutaryl coenzyme A; MAPKs, mitogen-activated protein kinases; PI3K, phosphoinositide 30 kinase; NO, nitric oxide; RT-PCR, 1 INSERM U606, University Paris 7, IFR 139, Lariboisie`re Hospital, 2 rue reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction; TBST, tris Ambroise Pare´, 75475 Paris Cedex 10, France hydroxymethylaminomethane buffered saline Tween-20; WT, 2 INSERM U526, Faculty of Medicine Pasteur, Equipe labellise´e LNC, IFR 50, wild-type form; zVAD-fmk, z-Val-Ala-Asp-fluoromethylketone Nice, France * Corresponding author: PJ Marie, INSERM Unit 606, Hoˆpital Lariboisie`re, 2 rue Ambroise Pare´, 75475 Paris cedex 10, France. Tel: þ 33-1-49-95-63-89; Fax: þ 33-1-49-95-84-52; E-mail: [email protected] Introduction Osteosarcoma is the most common primary malignant bone Received 29.8.05; revised 20.12.05; accepted 20.12.05; published online 10.2.06 tumour occuring in children and young adults. Although Edited by SH Kaufmann aggressive chemotherapy has improved the prognosis of osteosarcoma patients, resistance to chemotherapy remains Abstract a major mechanism responsible for the failure of osteo- sarcoma treatment.1 Several studies have established that Osteosarcoma is the most common primary bone tumour apoptotic pathways contribute to the cytotoxic action of in young adults.
    [Show full text]
  • Bempedoic Acid
    Drug and Biologic Coverage Policy Effective Date ............................................. 7/15/2020 Next Review Date ......................................... 7/1/2021 Coverage Policy Number .................................. 2015 Bempedoic acid Table of Contents Related Coverage Resources Coverage Policy ................................................... 1 Genetic Testing of Heritable Disorders FDA Approved Indications ................................... 4 Recommended Dosing ........................................ 4 General Background ............................................ 4 Coding/Billing Information .................................... 7 References .......................................................... 7 INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE The following Coverage Policy applies to health benefit plans administered by Cigna Companies. Certain Cigna Companies and/or lines of business only provide utilization review services to clients and do not make coverage determinations. References to standard benefit plan language and coverage determinations do not apply to those clients. Coverage Policies are intended to provide guidance in interpreting certain standard benefit plans administered by Cigna Companies. Please note, the terms of a customer’s particular benefit plan document [Group Service Agreement, Evidence of Coverage, Certificate of Coverage, Summary Plan Description (SPD) or similar plan document] may differ significantly from the standard benefit plans upon which these Coverage Policies are based. For example, a customer’s benefit
    [Show full text]