DOCSLIB.ORG

Feasibility Assessment for Reintroducing the Slender-Billed White-Breasted Nuthatch to South Puget Sound, Washington

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Feasibility Assessment for Reintroducing the Slender-Billed White-Breasted Nuthatch to South Puget Sound, Washington FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT FOR REINTRODUCING THE SLENDER-BILLED WHITE-BREASTED NUTHATCH TO SOUTH PUGET SOUND, WASHINGTON Prepared by: Gary L. Slater Bob Altman Ecostudies Institute American Bird Conservancy P.O. Box 703 311 NE Mistletoe Circle Mount Vernon, WA 98273 Corvallis, OR 97330 Prepared for: Pacific Coast Joint Venture U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS............................................................................................................ 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS................................................................................................................ 3 LIST OF TABLES.......................................................................................................................... 4 LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................ 4 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 5 PURPOSE....................................................................................................................................... 6 STATUS ......................................................................................................................................... 6 Conservation status ..................................................................................................................... 6 Systematics ................................................................................................................................. 7 Historic and current distribution ................................................................................................. 8 Changes in Population Status...................................................................................................... 9 Population Trends ..................................................................................................................... 10 LIFE HISTORY............................................................................................................................ 11 Habitat....................................................................................................................................... 11 Density and territory size.......................................................................................................... 12 Site fidelity................................................................................................................................ 13 Food habits and foraging .......................................................................................................... 14 Breeding biology and demography........................................................................................... 15 CAUSES OF EXTIRPATION...................................................................................................... 16 Habitat Loss and Degradation................................................................................................... 17 Cavity Availability.................................................................................................................... 18 Food Availability ...................................................................................................................... 20 Effects Associated With Small Populations ............................................................................. 21 Conclusions............................................................................................................................... 21 ADDRESSING THE CAUSES OF EXTIRPATION................................................................... 22 Oak Habitat Loss and Degradation........................................................................................... 22 Effects associated with small populations ................................................................................ 23 Conclusions............................................................................................................................... 23 HABITAT ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL RESTORATION SITES..................................... 23 Site identification...................................................................................................................... 24 Habitat Analysis........................................................................................................................ 30 Conservation efforts toward nuthatch habitats ......................................................................... 35 Preliminary population models................................................................................................. 36 LOCATION AND STATUS OF DONOR POPULATIONS....................................................... 40 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................................... 41 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................. 44 3 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Morphological and plumage characteristics of S. c. aculeata and S. c. tenuissima (from Aldrich 1944)................................................................................................................................ 50 Table 2. Recent breeding sites of SBWBNU in the South Puget Sound (from C Chappel, pers. comm.). ......................................................................................................................................... 50 Table 3. Slender-billed White-breasted Nuthatch population trend (percentage change per year) results based on BBS trend data for the period 1966-2004 (From Sauer et al. 2003). ................. 51 Table 4. Vegetation characteristics of SBWBNU nest sites and survey points where SBWBNU were detected and where they were not detected (Viste-Sparkman 2005). .................................. 53 Table 5. Vegetation characteristics of SBWBNU nest sites in oak trees and random oak trees (Viste-Sparkman 2005)................................................................................................................. 53 Table 6. Reproductive measures for White-breasted Nuthatches in North America and Eurasian Nuthatch........................................................................................................................................ 54 Table 7. Number of hectares of management or restoration directed towards oak habitat in the South Puget Sound region............................................................................................................. 55 Table 8. Total number of hectares of oak and pine habitat (ha) at two potential reintroduction sites for SBWBNU in South Puget Sound and the amount of habitat that is potentially suitable for SBWBNUs. ............................................................................................................................. 57 Table 9. List of model inputs for eight population models run with Program Vortex................ 58 Table 10. Model parameters and outcomes of SBWBNU population models (all runs based on 1000 simulations ........................................................................................................................... 61 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Slender-billed White-breasted Nuthatch population trends from Christmas Bird Count Data for Oregon and California sites. Data are 5-year moving averages (i.e, the number of birds per party-hour for each year is the mean of that year’s results plus the two previous years and the two following years....................................................................................................................... 52 Figure 2. Oak habitats at the Fort Lewis and Scatter Creek sites in South Puget Sound (Data from Chappel et al. 2003). ............................................................................................................ 56 Figure 3. Model results showing the mean number of individuals for 1000 simulations (includes successful and extirpated populations) over 100 years................................................................. 59 Figure 4. Model results showing the mean number of individuals for 1000 simulations (includes successful and extirpated populations) over 100 years................................................................. 60 4 INTRODUCTION Conservation efforts aimed at restoring biodiversity increasingly are turning to reintroduction as a tool to reestablish extirpated species to their former range (Griffith et al. 1989). Reintroductions may be required in cases where habitat loss and degradation has created fragmented habitats that prohibit dispersal pathways needed for recolonization. In some situations, reintroductions may be favored to accelerate the recolonization process, even when the extirpated species of interest has strong dispersal capabilities or habitat bridges exist between occupied and unoccupied habitat. Reintroductions are usually performed either through the release of captive-bred individuals or through the translocation of wild individuals from one part of their range to another (Griffith et al. 1989). In response to the increasing frequency with which reintroductions are being attempted, the IUCN (1995) developed guidelines for reintroduction efforts to insure that reintroductions are justifiable, that they are likely to succeed, and that the conservation world can gain knowledge
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Territory Size and Stability in a Sedentary Neotropical Passerine: Is Resource Partitioning a Necessary Condition?
    J. Field Ornithol. 76(4):395±401, 2005 Territory size and stability in a sedentary neotropical passerine: is resource partitioning a necessary condition? Janet V. Gorrell,1 Gary Ritchison,1,3 and Eugene S. Morton2 1 Department of Biological Sciences, Eastern Kentucky University, Richmond, Kentucky 40475 USA 2 Hemlock Hill Field Station, 22318 Teepleville Flats Road, Cambridge Springs, Pennsylvania 16403 USA Received 9 April 2004; accepted 11 April 2005 ABSTRACT. Long-term pair bonds and defense of territories year-round are common among tropical passer- ines. The boundaries of these territories tend to be stable, perhaps re¯ecting the need to defend an area that, regardless of conditions, provides suf®cient food resources. If, however, these stable territories are not, even tem- porarily, suf®ciently large, then intra-pair competition for available food may result, particularly in species with no sexual size dimorphism. With such competition, sex-speci®c differences in foraging behavior may result. Male and female Dusky Antbirds (Cercomacra tyrannina) are not size dimorphic, and pairs jointly defend territories throughout the year. Our objective was to determine if paired Dusky Antbirds exhibited sex-speci®c differences in foraging behavior. Foraging antbirds were observed in central Panama from February±July 2002 to determine if pairs par- titioned food resources. Males and females exhibited no differences in foraging behavior, with individuals of both sexes foraging at similar heights and using the same foraging maneuvers (glean, probe, and sally) and substrates (leaves, rolled leaves, and woody surfaces). These results suggest that Dusky Antbirds do not partition resources and that territory switching, rather than resource partitioning, may be the means by which they gain access to additional food resources.
    [Show full text]
  • South Tacoma Way, Circa 1913, Photo Courtesy of the Tacoma Public Library, Amzie D
    The west side of the 5200 block of South Tacoma Way, circa 1913, photo courtesy of the Tacoma Public Library, Amzie D. Browning Collection 158 2 011 Historic South Tacoma Way South Tacoma Way Business District In early 2011, Historic Tacoma reached out to the 60+ member South Tacoma Business District Association as part of its new neighborhood initiative. The area is home to one of the city’s most intact historic commercial business districts. A new commuter rail station is due to open in 2012, business owners are interested in S 52nd St taking advantage of City loan and grant programs for façade improvements, and Historic Tacoma sees S Washington St great opportunities in partnering with the district. S Puget Sound Ave The goals of the South Tacoma project are to identify and assess historic structures and then to partner with business owners and the City of Tacoma to conserve and revitalize the historic core of the South Tacoma Business District. The 2011 work plan includes: • conducting a detailed inventory of approximately 50 commercial structures in the historic center of the district • identification of significant and endangered South Way Tacoma properties in the district • development of action plans for endangered properties • production of a “historic preservation resource guide for community leaders” which can be S 54th St used by community groups across the City • ½ day design workshop for commercial property owners • production & distribution of a South Tacoma Business District tour guide and map • nominations to the Tacoma Register of Historic Places as requested by property owners • summer walking tour of the district Acknowledgements Project funding provided by Historic Tacoma, the South Tacoma Business District Association, the South Tacoma Neighborhood Council, the University of Washington-Tacoma, and Jim and Karen Rich.
    [Show full text]
  • Poland: May 2015
    Tropical Birding Trip Report Poland: May 2015 POLAND The Primeval Forests and Marshes of Eastern Europe May 22 – 31, 2015 Tour Leader: Scott Watson Report and Photos by Scott Watson Like a flying sapphire through the Polish marshes, the Bluethroat was a tour favorite. www.tropicalbirding.com +1-409-515-0514 [email protected] Page1 Tropical Birding Trip Report Poland: May 2015 Introduction Springtime in Eastern Europe is a magical place, with new foliage, wildflowers galore, breeding resident birds, and new arrivals from Africa. Poland in particular is beautiful this time of year, especially where we visited on this tour; the extensive Biebrza Marshes, and some of the last remaining old-growth forest left in Europe, the primeval forests of Bialowieski National Park, on the border with Belarus. Our tour this year was highly successfully, recording 168 species of birds along with 11 species of mammals. This includes all 10 possible Woodpecker species, many of which we found at their nest holes, using the best local knowledge possible. Local knowledge also got us on track with a nesting Boreal (Tengmalm’s) Owl, while a bit of effort yielded the tricky Eurasian Pygmy-Owl and the trickier Hazel Grouse. We also found 11 species of raptors on this tour, and we even timed it to the day that the technicolored European Bee-eaters arrived back to their breeding grounds. A magical evening was spent watching the display of the rare Great Snipe in the setting sun, with Common Snipe “winnowing” all around and the sounds of breeding Common Redshank and Black-tailed Godwits.
    [Show full text]
  • South Puget Sound Community College Year Three Mid-Cycle Evaluation
    South Puget Sound Community College Year Three Mid-Cycle Evaluation Dr. Timothy Stokes President September, 2014 Table of Contents Report on Year One Recommendation ......................................................................................................... 1 Mission .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 Part I .............................................................................................................................................................. 1 Mission Fulfillment .................................................................................................................................... 1 Operational Planning ................................................................................................................................ 2 Core Themes, Objectives and Indicators .................................................................................................. 3 Part II ............................................................................................................................................................. 4 Rationale for Indicators of Achievement .................................................................................................. 5 Increase Student Retention (Objective 1.A) ......................................................................................... 5 Support Student Completion (Objective 1.B) ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Common Birds of the Prescott Area Nuthatch.Cdr
    Birds are listed by their typical habitats. Coniferous Forest Riparian (Creekside) Woodland (Some species may be found in more Sharp-shinned Hawk (w) Anna's Hummingbird (s) than one habitat.) Cooper's Hawk Black-chinned Hummingbird (s) (w) = winter (s) = summer Broad-tailed Hummingbird (s) Rufous Hummingbird (s) Acorn Woodpecker Black Phoebe Pinyon/Juniper/Oak Woodland Red-naped Sapsucker (w) Plumbeous Vireo (s) and Chaparral Hairy Woodpecker Warbling Vireo (s) Gambel's Quail . Western Wood-Pewee (s) House Wren (s) Ash-throated Flycatcher (s) Cordilleran Flycatcher (s) Lucy's Warbler (s) Western Scrub-Jay Hutton's Vireo Yellow Warbler (s) Bridled Titmouse Steller's Jay Summer Tanager (s) Juniper Titmouse . Mountain Chickadee Song Sparrow (w) Bushtit White-breasted Nuthatch Lincoln's Sparrow (w) Bewick's Wren . Pygmy Nuthatch Blue Grosbeak (s) Ruby-crowned Kinglet (w) Brown Creeper Brown-headed Cowbird (s) Blue-gray Gnatcatcher (s) Western Bluebird Bullock's Oriole (s) Crissal Thrasher Hermit Thrush Lesser Goldfinch Phainopepla (s) Yellow-rumped Warbler (w) Lake and Marsh Virginia's Warbler (s) Grace's Warbler (s) Black-throated Gray Warbler (s) Red-faced Warbler (s) Pied-billed Grebe Spotted Towhee Painted Redstart (s) Eared Grebe (w) Canyon Towhee Hepatic Tanager (s) Double-crested Cormorant Rufous-crowned Sparrow Western Tanager (s) Great Blue Heron White-crowned Sparrow (w) Chipping Sparrow Gadwall (w) Black-headed Grosbeak (s) Dark-eyed Junco (w) American Wigeon (w) Scott’s Oriole (s) Pine Siskin Mallard Lake and Marsh (cont.) Varied or Other Habitats Cinnamon Teal (s) Turkey Vulture (s) Common Birds Northern Shoveler (w) Red-tailed Hawk Northern Pintail (w) Rock Pigeon of the Green-winged Teal (w) Eurasian Collared-Dove Prescott Canvasback (w) Mourning Dove Ring-necked Duck (w) Greater Roadrunner Area Lesser Scaup (w) Ladder-backed Woodpecker Bufflehead (w) Northern Flicker Common Merganser (w) Cassin's Kingbird (s) Ruddy Duck (w) Common Raven American Coot Violet-green Swallow (s) .
    [Show full text]
  • Wallcreeper and the Camargue
    Wallcreeper and The Camargue Naturetrek Tour Report 19 – 23 November 2018 Firecrest Western Swamphen Stripeless Tree Frog Spoonbill Report compiled by Matt Collis Images courtesy of Neil McMahon Naturetrek Mingledown Barn Wolf's Lane Chawton Alton Hampshire GU34 3HJ UK T: +44 (0)1962 733051 E: [email protected] W: www.naturetrek.co.uk Tour Report Wallcreepers and The Camargue Tour participants: Matt Collis & Neil McMahon (leaders) with 16 Naturetrek clients Summary A short birding trip to the very special Camargue district of southern France provides an excellent opportunity to experience good views of typical waterbirds of the west Mediterranean. Utilising a family-run hotel on the outskirts of the ancient city of Arles as our base, the itinerary provided an easy opportunity to look for flamingoes, herons and wading birds using the shallow waters and reed-fringed lagoons as a breeding area or a suitable stop-over for migrants. The mountainous areas attract different and more localized species and we located special birds such as Wallcreeper, Rock Sparrow and Booted Eagle, together with a selection of other stunning species that call the Camargue home. Day 1 Monday 19th November Arriving in the early evening, leaders Neil and Matt met 15 of the 16 clients at Marseille airport, before collecting the minibuses and beginning the journey to the hotel. French protests and road blocks meant the route was more cross country but after just over an hour or so we arrived at our destination, Hotel des Granges. We were greeted by Bruno and Marie-Jo, our wonderful hosts and owners of this classically French Hotel, and a lone Black Redstart, the first bird for our trip, sat roosting over the entrance porch.
    [Show full text]
  • PPCO Twist System
    A Brown-headed Nuthatch brings food to the nest. Color-coded leg bands enable the authors and their colleagues to discern the curious and potentially complex relationships among the various individuals at Tall Timbers Research Station on the Florida–Georgia line. Photo by © Tara Tanaka. photos by Tara Tanaka Tallahassee, Florida [email protected] 46 BIRDING • FEBRUARY 2016 arblers are gorgeous, jays boisterous, and sparrows elusive, Wbut words like “cute” and “adorable” come to mind when the conversation shifts to Brown-headed Nuthatches. The word “cute” doesn’t appear in the scientifc literature regularly, but science may help to explain its frequent association with nuthatch- es. The large heads and small bodies nuthatches possess have propor- tions similar to those found on young children. Psychologists have found that these proportions conjure up “innate attractive” respons- es among adult humans even when the proportions fall on strange objects (Little 2012). This range-restricted nuthatch associated with southeastern pine- woods has undergone steep declines in recent decades and is listed as a species of special concern in most states in which it breeds (Cox and Widener 2008). The population restricted to Grand Bahama Island appears to be critically endangered (Hayes et al. 2004). Add to these concerns some intriguing biology that includes helpers at the nest, communal winter roosts, seed caching, social grooming, and the use of tools, and you have some scintillating science all bound up in one “cute” and “adorable” package. James
    [Show full text]
  • The All-Bird Bulletin
    Advancing Integrated Bird Conservation in North America Spring 2014 Inside this issue: The All-Bird Bulletin Protecting Habitat for 4 the Buff-breasted Sandpiper in Bolivia The Neotropical Migratory Bird Conservation Conserving the “Jewels 6 Act (NMBCA): Thirteen Years of Hemispheric in the Crown” for Neotropical Migrants Bird Conservation Guy Foulks, Program Coordinator, Division of Bird Habitat Conservation, U.S. Fish and Bird Conservation in 8 Wildlife Service (USFWS) Costa Rica’s Agricultural Matrix In 2000, responding to alarming declines in many Neotropical migratory bird popu- Uruguayan Rice Fields 10 lations due to habitat loss and degradation, Congress passed the Neotropical Migra- as Wintering Habitat for tory Bird Conservation Act (NMBCA). The legislation created a unique funding Neotropical Shorebirds source to foster the cooperative conservation needed to sustain these species through all stages of their life cycles, which occur throughout the Western Hemi- Conserving Antigua’s 12 sphere. Since its first year of appropriations in 2002, the NMBCA has become in- Most Critical Bird strumental to migratory bird conservation Habitat in the Americas. Neotropical Migratory 14 Bird Conservation in the The mission of the North American Bird Heart of South America Conservation Initiative is to ensure that populations and habitats of North Ameri- Aros/Yaqui River Habi- 16 ca's birds are protected, restored, and en- tat Conservation hanced through coordinated efforts at in- ternational, national, regional, and local Strategic Conservation 18 levels, guided by sound science and effec- in the Appalachians of tive management. The NMBCA’s mission Southern Quebec is to achieve just this for over 380 Neo- tropical migratory bird species by provid- ...and more! Cerulean Warbler, a Neotropical migrant, is a ing conservation support within and be- USFWS Bird of Conservation Concern and listed as yond North America—to Latin America Vulnerable on the International Union for Conser- Coordination and editorial vation of Nature (IUCN) Red List.
    [Show full text]
  • Foraging Niche Structure and Coexistence in a Highly Diverse Community Of
    Foraging niche structure and coexistence in a highly diverse community of Amazonian antbirds (Thamnophilidae: Aves) by SANTIAGO DAVID B.Sc, Universidad de Antioquia, 2011 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE AND POSTDOCTORAL STUDIES (Zoology) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) May 2016 © Santiago David, 2016 Abstract The high species richness of antbirds (Thamnophilidae) in Amazonian lowlands, where as many as 40 species may coexist at local scales, represents a major challenge for ecologists to explain patterns of coexistence and niche evolution. I studied the foraging ecology of a local community of antbirds in a 2-Km2 area of lowland forest in SE Peru to examine how co- occurring antbird species differ in their use of foraging resources, and whether these differences result in niche partitioning at the community level. I also examined whether resource use similarity was related to phylogenetic similarity in this local assemblage. Forty-four species of antbirds were detected in the study plot in a four-year period, with 30 species categorized as the local assemblage of common resident breeders. Multivariate analysis of foraging parameters showed that segregation at two height layers in two types of forest was more important than foraging substrates and maneuvers in explaining the differences observed in foraging behavior. However, a null model analysis revealed that at the community level, antbirds exhibited high foraging niche overlap, with average observed overlap significantly larger than expected by chance, indicating that antbirds prefer, rather than avoid, resources used by other species.
    [Show full text]
  • Pine-Oak-Hemlock--Silviculture Institute 7/18/2017 1
    Pine‐Oak‐Hemlock‐‐Silviculture Institute 7/18/2017 Predicted Responses of Wildlife to Silvicultural Treatments with special focus on Pine‐Oak‐Hemlock Types Matt Tarr Associate Extension Professor, Wildlife Specialist University of New Hampshire Cooperative Extension Northeast Silviculture Institute for Foresters June 18, 2017 What am I talking about? OUTLINE • Overview of the primary factors that determine how wildlife respond to timber harvesting • Overview of how birds, mammals, reptiles & amphibians select their habitat • Summary of expected wildlife response following application of silvicultural treatments in pine‐oak‐hemlock MY GOAL: Help you become better at predicting how wildlife will respond to the decisions you make when managing forested habitats 1 Pine‐Oak‐Hemlock‐‐Silviculture Institute 7/18/2017 When we cut trees, the response by wildlife is determined primarily by: • Plant species • Plant structure composition following the harvest • The size of the canopy opening • Whether soils are • Presence/absence of • Habitats in the dry/moist/wet special habitat features surrounding landscape “Plant structure” = presence & density of plants in each forest layer • What plant layers are present? Canopy layer >30’ Midstory layer 10-30’ Shrub layer 2-10’ Herbaceous layer 0-2’ • How dense are the plants in each layer? SPARSE INTERMEDIATE ABUNDANT/DENSE < 30% coverage 30-75% coverage > 75% coverage 2 Pine‐Oak‐Hemlock‐‐Silviculture Institute 7/18/2017 Role of plant structure in influencing wildlife use of forest stands Forest stands comprised
    [Show full text]
  • A Description of Mixed-Species Insectivorous Bird Flocks in Western Mexico’
    The Condor 89~282-292 0 The Cooper Omithologml Society 1987 A DESCRIPTION OF MIXED-SPECIES INSECTIVOROUS BIRD FLOCKS IN WESTERN MEXICO’ RICHARD L. HUTTO Department of Zoology, Universityof Montana, Missoula, MT 59812 Abstract. Insectivorousbird flockswere observed in all typesof forestedhabitats during the nonbreedingseason in westernMexico. The speciescomposition of flockschanged markedlyand predictablyamong five categoriesof habitat type. The averagenumber of speciesper flockin lowlandhabitats was 4.7, while a mean of 18.6 speciesparticipated in highlandflocks, ranking the latter amongthe most species-richflocks in the world. The meanproportion of the localinsectivorous species that participatedin mixed-speciesflocks wassignificantly greater in the highlands(6 1.3%)than in the lowlands(24.6%). About half of the flock participantsin both undisturbedlowland and highlandhabitats were north temperatemigrants, ranking west Mexican flocks among the mostmigrant-rich in the world as well. In highlandflocks, the maximum numberof individualsper attendantspecies was generallytwo to three,but therewere often six to twelveindividuals belonging to eachof severalnuclear species. The lowlanddeciduous forest flocks seemed to lack nuclearspecies. Key words: Mixed-speciesflocks; insectivorousbirds; Mexico; migratory birds;pine-oak woodlands;tropical deciduous forests. INTRODUCTION mixed-speciesflocks in 26 sites(Appendix I) that Mixed-speciesinsectivorous bird flockshave been were distributed among various habitats described from temperate and tropical areas throughout western Mexico. The habitat types worldwide (Rand 1954), and are known to occur that I surveyed can be roughly classified (after in practically every habitat type (Powell 1985). Pesman 1962) as belonging to either lowland Although mixed-species flocks are quite com- (tropical deciduous and tropical evergreen) or mon in north temperate regions during the non- highland (oak, pine-oak, and boreal) forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Conforming Crest Quick Reference
    Avian Models for 3D Applications Characters and Texture Mapping by Ken Gilliland 1 Songbird ReMix European Edition Contents Manual Introduction 3 Overview and Use 3 Conforming Crest Quick Reference 4 Creating a Songbird ReMix Bird with Poser and DAZ Sudio 5 Using Conforming Crests with Poser 6 Using Conforming Crests with DAZ Studio 8 Field Guide List of Species 9 Blue Tit 10 Crested Tit 11 Great Tit 12 Long-tailed Tit 13 Eurasian Jay 14 Common Magpie 15 Common Jackdaw 16 European Starling 17 Common Chaffinch 19 Common Linnet 20 European Goldfinch 21 European Robin 22 Eurasian Nuthatch 23 Resources, Credits and Thanks 24 Opinions expressed on this booklet are solely that of the author, Ken Gilliland, and may or may not reflect the opinions of the publisher, DAZ 3D. 2 Songbird ReMix European Edition Manual & Field Guide Copyrighted 2006-2011 by Ken Gilliland songbirdremix.com Introduction European Edition includes many of the most common birds found in Europe such as the robin, chaffinch and linnet. Also included are the colorful avian species such as the vivid European Goldfinch or Eurasian Jay. The Jackdaw, Magpie or Starling are perfect for perching on castle walls or medieval villages. The entire Tit family is also included (the Blue Tit, the Crested Tit, Great Tit and even the Long-tailed Tit) are a perfect addition to wooded or even urban scenes. Overview and Use Select Figures in Runtime Folder and go to the Songbird ReMix folder. Here you’ll find an assortment of files that are easily broken into 2 groups: Conforming Parts and Bird Base models.
    [Show full text]