Commissioning Through Evaluation Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy Final

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Commissioning Through Evaluation Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy Final Commissioning through Evaluation Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy Final Report 28 September 2018 Table of Contents Commissioning through Evaluation ......................................................... 0 Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy ..................................................................... 0 Commissioning through Evaluation ......................................................... 0 Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy ..................................................................... 0 Project Details ......................................................................................... 6 Executive Summary ................................................................................. 7 Summary ................................................................................................ 7 Background ............................................................................................. 7 Methods ................................................................................................. 8 KiTEC Staff members ............................................................................. 12 Glossary of Terms and Abbreviations..................................................... 13 1. Description of the Project ............................................................... 16 1.1 Overview of Cerebral Palsy 16 1.2 Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy 17 1.3 Commissioning through Evaluation 18 2. Study Overview .............................................................................. 21 2.1 Study Background 21 2.2 Study working groups 22 2.3 Patient Database Structure 22 a. Database Overview 22 b. Changes to the database 24 c. Patient inclusion criteria for the database 24 d. Patient inclusion criteria for the SDR procedure 24 e. Patient exclusion criteria for the SDR procedure 25 2.4 Meetings 25 a. Site Visits 25 b. Steering Group Meetings 27 2.5 Provider Experience Questionnaire (PEQ) 28 2.6 Post-Operative Physiotherapy Services Questionnaire (POPSQ) 29 2.7 Interim Report 29 1 3. Research Governance, Ethics & Intellectual Property ...................... 30 3.1 Information governance requirements 30 3.2 Details of the Database System Used 30 3.3 Ethical considerations 32 4. Systematic Review.......................................................................... 33 4.1 Systematic Review Methodology 33 4.2 Systematic Review Results 35 4.3 Systematic Review Conclusions 48 4.4 Additional Studies Results 49 4.5 Additional Studies Conclusions 71 5. Methods ........................................................................................ 73 5.1 Sample Size 73 5.2 Data Completeness analysis methods 73 a. Active Surveillance 73 b. Data Completeness Overview 75 5.3 Recruitment and Baseline data analysis 75 5.4 Primary effectiveness and safety outcomes 76 a. GMFM-66 76 b. CP-QoL 77 c. Descriptive statistics for primary outcomes: GMFM-66, GMFM-66 Centiles, CP-QoL 78 d. Adverse Events 78 e. Primary effectiveness and safety outcomes: analysis 79 5.5 Secondary outcomes 80 a. Intraoperative Assessment 80 b. Physiotherapist assessment 81 c. Modified Ashworth Scale 82 d. Duncan-ely 82 e. MRC Strength Scale 82 f. Boyd and Graham test 83 g. Range of Motion (ROM) 84 h. Gait 84 i. Hip X-Ray 84 j. Spine X-Ray 84 k. Orthopaedic Surgery Likelihood 85 l. Secondary outcomes: analysis 85 5.6 PEQ analysis methods 85 5.7 POPSQ analysis methods 85 5.8 Statistical Packages 86 6. Results ........................................................................................... 87 6.1 Data Completeness 87 a. Active Surveillance 87 b. Data Completeness Overall 87 2 6.2 Patient Recruitment 89 6.3 Baseline Characteristics 93 6.4 Primary Outcome Measures 96 a. GMFM-66 96 b. CP-QoL – primary caregiver/parent version 103 c. CP-QoL – child version 108 d. Adverse Events 108 6.5 Secondary Outcome Measures 111 a. Intraoperative Assessment 111 b. Modified Ashworth Scale 113 c. Physiotherapy 116 d. Duncan-ely 118 e. MRC Strength Scale 119 f. Boyd and Graham 123 g. Range of Motion (ROM) 124 h. Gait 126 i. Hip X-Ray 129 j. Spine X-Ray 129 k. Orthopaedic Surgery Likelihood 130 7. Health Economics (HE) .................................................................. 133 7.1 HE: Introduction 133 7.2 HE: The incremental cost of SDR 135 7.3 HE: Children in the data 135 7.4 HE: Analysis applied to the cost data 136 7.5 HE: Results of the analysis of cost data 137 7.6 HE: Incremental Effectiveness of SDR 139 7.7 HE: Subgroup Analysis 141 7.8 HE: Results of the analysis of outcomes 142 7.9 HE: Cost-Effectiveness of SDR 143 7.10 HE: Cost Effectiveness Results 144 7.11 HE: Subgroup Analysis 146 7.12 HE: Discussion 149 7.13 HE: Conclusion 154 8. Provider Experience Questionnaire (PEQ) ..................................... 155 8.1 Background of the PEQ 155 8.2 Overview of the PEQ 156 a. PEQ Pre-data Collection Period 156 b. PEQ Data Collection Period 157 c. PEQ Sampling Frame 157 d. PEQ Structure 158 8.3 PEQ Information and Ethical Governance 158 e. PEQ Analysis Considerations 158 a. PEQ Information Governance Requirements 159 a. PEQ Ethical Considerations 159 8.4 PEQ Results 160 3 a. PEQ Respondents: Overview 160 b. PEQ: Overall Experience with SDR 162 c. PEQ: CtE SDR Selection Criteria 165 d. PEQ: SDR Operation Resources 166 e. PEQ: Referral Pathways 168 f. PEQ: SDR CtE Timelines 169 g. PEQ: Interaction with SDR families 170 h. PEQ: Interaction with External Bodies 172 i. PEQ: Additional Comments 174 8.5 PEQ Discussion 176 8.6 PEQ Conclusions 180 9. Post-Operative Physiotherapy Services Questionnaire (POPSQ) .... 181 9.1 POPSQ Project Background 181 9.2 POPSQ Design 182 a. POPSQ: Survey Design 182 a. POPSQ: Data Collection Issues 182 b. POPSQ: Analysis 183 9.3 POPSQ Information Governance Requirements 183 9.4 POPSQ Ethical Considerations 184 9.5 POPSQ Results 184 a. POPSQ: Pre-operative Evaluation 184 b. POPSQ: Post-Operative Evaluation 189 c. POPSQ: Post-Operative Specific Services 195 d. POPSQ: Feedback 197 e. CtE database post-SDR physiotherapy binary question results 201 9.6 POPSQ Discussion 202 9.7 POPSQ Conclusions 207 10. Discussion ................................................................................. 208 10.1 Principal Findings 208 10.2 Study strengths and limitations 212 11. Conclusions ............................................................................... 214 12. Acknowledgements ................................................................... 215 References .......................................................................................... 218 Appendix 1: Data Dictionary ................................................................ 223 Appendix 2: Patient information sheets (PIS) ....................................... 264 a. Parent Version of PIS 264 b. Child Version of PIS for Under 5 years of age 268 c. Child Version of PIS for 5 years of age and over 269 4 Appendix 3: Consent Form (database) ................................................. 270 Appendix 4: Database Changes ............................................................ 271 Appendix 5: HRA CtE SDR database approval ....................................... 275 Appendix 6: HRA CtE SDR database minor amendment........................ 280 Appendix 7: Systematic Review – search terminology .......................... 282 Appendix 8: PRISMA Flow Diagram ..................................................... 286 Appendix 9: GMFCS II and III outcome data ......................................... 287 a. Intraoperative Assessment – Levels II and III 287 b. Modified Ashworth Scale – GMFCS levels II and III 288 c. Physiotherapy – GMFCS levels II and III 292 d. Duncan-ely – GMFCS levels II and III 296 e. MRC Strength Scale – GMFCS Levels II and III 298 f. Boyd and Graham – GMFCS Levels II and III 306 g. Range of Motion (ROM) – GMFCS Levels II and III 307 h. Gait – GMFCS Levels II and III 311 i. Hip X-Ray – GMFCS Levels II and III 317 j. Spine X-Ray – GMFCS Levels II and III 318 k. Orthopaedic Surgery Likelihood – GMFCS Levels II and III 319 Appendix 10: PEQ data dictionary ....................................................... 324 Appendix 11: POPSQ paper version ..................................................... 329 Appendix 12: POPSQ HRA approval (copy) ........................................... 334 Appendix 13: Additional NHS England/NICE CtE Evaluation Questions . 339 5 Project Details Work package reference RX070 Work package name Commissioning through Evaluation: Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy Produced by KiTEC - King's Technology Evaluation Centre School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences King's College London Becket House, 5th Floor 1 Lambeth Palace Road London SE1 7EU, United Kingdom Phone: +44 (0)20 7848 9528 Project Lead Peacock, Janet Authors (alphabetical) Bourmpaki, Elli Bunce, Catey Coker, Bola Eddy, Saskia Elstad, Maria Hussein, Ediz Keevil, Stephen Peacock, Janet Pennington, Mark Radhakrishnan, Muralikrishnan Summers, Jennifer Correspondence to Prof Janet Peacock, 0207 848 6649, [email protected] Date completed 28 September 2018 Version 1.0 6 Executive Summary Summary This report provides an evaluation of the effects of the surgical procedure, Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy (SDR) in eligible children with cerebral palsy and is part of the Commissioning through Evaluation (CtE) Programme led by NHS England. SDR was commissioned in five centres in 137 children from 2014-16 and outcome data were collected over a two-year post-surgery period. Data obtained included measures of Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-66), Cerebral Palsy
Recommended publications
  • REINTEGRATION of NORMAL DEVELOPMENTAL MOTOR PATTERNS in the POST SELECTIVE DORSAL RHIZOTOMY PEDIATRIC POPULATION: a CASE REPORT Kotecha R
    REINTEGRATION OF NORMAL DEVELOPMENTAL MOTOR PATTERNS IN THE POST SELECTIVE DORSAL RHIZOTOMY PEDIATRIC POPULATION: A CASE REPORT Kotecha R Mayo School of Health Sciences Program in Physical Therapy No funding Compliance Statement Subjects signed a consent form. Subject data was kept confidential. BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Cerebral Palsy (CP) occurs in nearly 4 per 1,000 live births, and is the most common cause of motor disability in children. Characterized by permanent deficits of movement development and posture, it causes activity limitations. Spastic CP constitutes 80% of children with CP. Symptoms include muscle weakness, joint contractures, abnormal gait patterns, and joint tightness. Spasticity is a condition where abnormal increases in muscle tone may interfere with movement. Selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) has become a common surgical intervention for patients with CP. Abnormal movement patterns may persist after surgery, thus facilitating well- coordinated movement patterns through intensive physical therapy is required for return of function. Current literature does not outline specific functional exercises used to help achieve this goal. The purpose of this case report is to describe the measures used to reintegrate normal movement patterns for a child with spastic CP post a selective dorsal rhizotomy. CASE DESCRIPTION: The patient was a 6 year old male with a medical diagnosis of spastic CP referred to physical therapy for a post SDR examination. Upon examination, deficits in range of motion, spasticity, isolated motor control, functional posture, and performance of transfers were noted. During 20 therapy sessions, focused interventions were used to facilitate specific developmental positions and reintegrate normal movement patterns. OUTCOMES: Improvements were observed in all outcome measures: motor portion of WeeFIM, spasticity measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale, isolated motor control, and functional improvements measured by subjective measures.
    [Show full text]
  • Selective Posterior Rhizotomy: Results of Five Pilot Cases
    Selective posterior rhizotomy Selectiveposteriorrhizotomy:resultsoffivepilotcases KYYam,DFong,KKwong,BYiu We report on two patients with spastic quadriplegia and three patients with spastic diplegia who under- went selective posterior rhizotomy. The mean period of follow-up was 15 months (range, 12-21 months). The patients were assessed preoperatively and at 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery. Tests included those for muscle tone (using a modified Ashworth scale), range of passive movement, functional status, and gait pattern. Muscle tone was reduced substantially after the procedure, and the range of passive movement was increased. Both the dependent and independent ambulators showed an increment in their walking velocity and stride length. There were no postoperative complications apart from mild fever and the treatment was well tolerated by both patients and parents. There was no return of spasticity in any of the patients during follow-up. The reduced spasticity resulted in better motor performance, and patients felt more comfortable with their daily activities. We conclude that selective posterior rhizotomy should be considered for those patients who have cerebral palsy and are disabled by spasticity. HKMJ 1999;5:287-90 Key words: Cerebral palsy; Muscle spasticity; Spinal nerve roots/surgery Introduction operative electrical stimulation. Peacock et al4 modified this technique and applied it to the cauda equina region Selective posterior rhizotomy is a neurosurgical pro- after having performed a multilevel laminectomy; the cedure that is performed in patients who have spastic lower sacral roots could be identified and preserved, and cerebral palsy. In the early 1900s, Foerster demon- hence sphincter function was preserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Spasticity of the Gastrosoleus Muscle Is Related To
    Spasticity of the gastrosoleus muscle is related to the development of reduced passive dorsiflexion of the ankle in children with cerebral palsy A registry analysis of 2,796 examinations in 355 children Hägglund, Gunnar; Wagner, Philippe Published in: Acta Orthopaedica DOI: 10.3109/17453674.2011.618917 2011 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Hägglund, G., & Wagner, P. (2011). Spasticity of the gastrosoleus muscle is related to the development of reduced passive dorsiflexion of the ankle in children with cerebral palsy A registry analysis of 2,796 examinations in 355 children. Acta Orthopaedica, 82(6), 744-748. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2011.618917 Total number of authors: 2 General rights Unless other specific re-use rights are stated the following general rights apply: Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Read more about Creative commons licenses: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
    [Show full text]
  • Effectiveness of Treatment in Children with Cerebral Palsy
    Open Access Original Article DOI: 10.7759/cureus.13754 Effectiveness of Treatment in Children With Cerebral Palsy Syed Faraz Ul Hassan Shah Gillani 1 , Akkad Rafique 2 , Muhammad Taqi 3 , Muhammad Ayaz ul Haq Chatta 4 , Faisal Masood 5 , Tauseef Ahmad Blouch 3 , Syed Muhammad Awais 3 1. Orthopedic Surgery, King Edward Medical University/Mayo Hospital Lahore, Lahore, PAK 2. Orthopedics and Traumatology, Mohterma Benazir Bhutto Medical Shaheed College, Mirpur Azad Jammu Kashmir, PAK 3. Orthopedics and Traumatology, King Edward Medical University/Mayo Hospital Lahore, Lahore, PAK 4. Surgery, King Edward Medical University/Mayo Hospital Lahore, Lahore, PAK 5. Orthopaedic Surgery, King Edward Medical University/Mayo Hospital Lahore, Lahore, PAK Corresponding author: Muhammad Taqi, [email protected] Abstract Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of conservative and surgical treatment in cerebral palsy children by evaluating the Medical Research Council (MRC) grading system, modified Ashworth scale, and Barthel Activities of Daily Life (ADL) scale. Method: This prospective case series was performed using a non-probability consecutive sampling technique at the Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, King Edward Medical University/Mayo Hospital, Lahore from October 2011 to November 2013. Two hundred children of all ages, having cerebral palsy diagnosed on history and clinical examination were enrolled in the study. Children were treated with conservative and surgical treatment. Pre- and post-treatment, all children were classified based on movement disorder (spastic, athetoid, ataxic, and mixed), parts of the body involved (paraplegic, tetraplegic, diplegic, hemiplegic, monoplegic, double hemiplegic, and triplegic), and gross motor function (GMFCS level I-IV).
    [Show full text]
  • Intraobserver Reliability of Modified Ashworth Scale and Modified Tardieu Scale in the Assessment of Spasticity in Children with Cerebral Palsy
    ORIGINAL ARTICLE Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2012;46(3):196-200 doi:10.3944/AOTT.2012.2697 Intraobserver reliability of modified Ashworth scale and modified Tardieu scale in the assessment of spasticity in children with cerebral palsy Ayfle NUMANO⁄LU, Mintaze Kerem GÜNEL Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze the intraobserver reliability of the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) and Modified Tardieu Scale (MTS) in the assessment of spasticity in children with cere- bral palsy (CP). Methods: Elbow flexor muscles, wrist flexor muscles, hip adductors, hamstrings, gastrocnemius and soleus muscles of 37 children (mean age: 8.97±4.41) with spastic CP were evaluated using the MAS and MTS according to the severity of spasticity. Results: Intraobserver reliability of MAS was significant for all assessments (p<0.01) and reliability ranged from ‘low’ to ‘average’. The reliability of MTS was significant for all assessments (p<0.01) and intraobserver reliability ranged among ‘average’, ‘good’ and ‘excellent’. Conclusion: Although the high intraobserver reliability for MTS to assess spasticity level in muscles of children with CP will improve usage of this scale, new research testing the intraobserver reliability of this scale is needed. Key words: Cerebral palsy; intraobserver reliability; Modified Ashworth Scale; Modified Tardieu Scale; spasticity. Cerebral palsy (CP) refers to a non-progressive central The increase in the muscle tonus limits functional nervous system deficit. The lesion may be in single or skills, inhibits isolated joint movement, interrupts volun- multiple locations of the brain, resulting in definite tary movements, interrupts sleep with spasms, and in motor and some degree of sensory abnormality as well severe cases causes delay in motor development stages and [1] as other associated disabilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Spasticity of the Gastrosoleus Muscle Is Related to the Development of Reduced Passive Dorsiflexion of the Ankle in Children
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by PubMed Central 744 Acta Orthopaedica 2011; 82 (6): 744–748 Spasticity of the gastrosoleus muscle is related to the development of reduced passive dorsiflexion of the ankle in children with cere- bral palsy A registry analysis of 2,796 examinations in 355 children Gunnar Hägglund1 and Philippe Wagner2 1Department of Orthopedics and 2Swedish National Competence Center for Musculoskeletal Disorders, Lund University, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden Correspondence: [email protected] Submitted 10-12-07. Accepted 11-09-29 Background and purpose Spasticity and muscle contracture A spastic muscle will not allow stretch to the same degree are two common manifestations of cerebral palsy (CP). A spastic as a muscle with normal tone. As a consequence, spasticity muscle may inhibit growth in length of the muscle, but the impor- may inhibit growth in the length of the muscle, resulting in the tance of this relationship is not known. In 1994, a register and development of muscle contracture—measured as a decreas- a healthcare program for children with CP in southern Sweden ing range of joint motion (Rang et al. 1986). Other manifesta- were initiated. The child’s muscle tone according to the Ashworth tions of CP, such as loss of selective muscle control, muscle scale and the ankle range of motion (ROM) is measured annu- weakness, or imbalance between agonists and antagonists ally during the entire growth period. We have used these data to may also result in the development of muscle contracture.
    [Show full text]
  • Translating Modified Ashworth Scale Into Functional Measures and Quantitative Kinematic Values: a Pilot Study Patrick Frigge University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
    University of Wisconsin Milwaukee UWM Digital Commons Theses and Dissertations August 2016 Translating Modified Ashworth Scale into Functional Measures and Quantitative Kinematic Values: A Pilot Study Patrick Frigge University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.uwm.edu/etd Part of the Occupational Therapy Commons Recommended Citation Frigge, Patrick, "Translating Modified Ashworth Scale into Functional Measures and Quantitative Kinematic Values: A Pilot Study" (2016). Theses and Dissertations. 1264. https://dc.uwm.edu/etd/1264 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by UWM Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UWM Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TRANSLATING MODIFIED ASHWORTH SCALE INTO FUNCTIONAL MEASURES AND QUANTITATIVE KINEMATIC VALUES: A PILOT STUDY by Patrick D. Frigge A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Occupational Therapy at The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee August 2016 ABSTRACT TRANSLATING MODIFIED ASHWORTH SCALE INTO FUNCTIONAL MEASURES AND QUANTITATIVE KINEMATIC VALUES: A PILOT STUDY by Patrick D. Frigge The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2016 Under the Supervision of Professor Ying-Chih Wang, PhD Introduction: Spasticity is a motor disorder characterized by a velocity-dependent increase in tonic stretch reflexes. The gold standard for assessing spasticity in stroke patients is the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), but the scale is highly subjective to the clinician’s opinion and previous experience and lacks psychometric fidelity. Numerous studies have criticized the scale’s subjectivity and lack of rater reliability.
    [Show full text]
  • The Modified Ashworth Scale
    Myth #2 : The Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) is a valid test of spasticity Beverly (Billi) Cusick, PT, MS, C/NDT, COF When JW Lance (1980) inserted the words “muscle tone” into his description of spasticity as “a velocity-dependent increase in tonic stretch reflexes (“muscle tone”) with exaggerated phasic reflexes”, he threw a fox into the hen house of understanding. When muscle tone is considered as a status of resistance to passive stretch, it is not possible to distinguish reflex-related and non-reflex properties of passive elasticity and viscosity in the muscle and soft tissues. Muscle tone is not velocity dependent. Spasticity – or exaggerated reflex responses to passive stretch at high velocity - appears to be, though that notion has never been validated (Pandyan et al 2005). Hypertonus is a state of increased stiffness, and hypotonus is a state of reduced stiffness, in the presence of passive stretch at any velocity (de Vlugt et al 2010). The literature holds abundant evidence of the prevalence of increased passive stiffness (hypertonus) in the triceps surae (TS) muscles of children and adults with CNS dysfunction (Castle et al 1979, Tardieu et al 1982, 1982a & 1989, Hurschmidt et al 1985, Ito et al 1996, O’Dwyer et al 1996, Rose et al 1994 & 1998, Vattanasilp et al 2000, Singer et al 2003, Gracies et al 2005, Galiana et al 2005, Dietz et al 2007, Pohl et al 2007, Chung et al 2008, Gao et al 2008 & 2009, Lorentzen et al 2010, Willerslev-Olsen et al 2013, de Gooijer-van de Groep et al 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Psychometric Evidence of Spasticity Measurement Tools in Cerebral Palsy Children and Adolescents: a Systematic Review
    J Rehabil Med 2013; 45: 14–23 REVIEW ARTICLE PSYCHOMETRIC EVIDENCE OF SPASTICITY MEASUREMENT TOOLS IN CEREBRAL PALSY CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW Véronique H. Flamand, OT, MSc1,2*, Hugo Massé-Alarie, PT, MSc1,2 and Cyril Schneider, PhD1,2 From the 1Axe neurosciences du Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec, Clinical Neuroscience and neuroStimulation Laboratory, and 2Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada Objective: To conduct a systematic review using validated (CP), a permanent condition originating from a neurological critical appraisal scales to analyze both the quality and con- disturbance that occurred in utero or during perinatal devel- tent of the psychometric evidence of spasticity measurement opment (2). Futhermore, impairment of motor performance tools in cerebral palsy children and adolescents. in CP disrupts functional achievement of daily activities (3), Data Sources: The literature search was performed in 3 da- participation in recreational activities (4) and peer relationships tabases (Pubmed, CINAHL, Embase) up to March 2012. (5). Among various forms of muscle overactivity, spasticity Study Selection: To be retained for detailed review, studies thus represents an important therapeutic target in rehabilitation had to report on at least one psychometric property of one or in the attempt to optimize motor performance and increase the many spasticity assessment tool(s) used to evaluate cerebral functional gains in children with CP (6). palsy children and adolescents. Quantification of spasticity is of importance to portray Data Extraction: Two raters independently reviewed admis- the functional capacity of children with CP and to docu- sible articles using a critical appraisal scale and a structured ment changes after occupational and physical therapies.
    [Show full text]
  • “A Comparative Study to Determine the Effectiveness of Neuro Muscular Electrical Stimulation and Passive Stretching Versus
    “A COMPARATIVE STUDY TO DETERMINE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF NEURO MUSCULAR ELECTRICAL STIMULATION AND PASSIVE STRETCHING VERSUS PASSIVE STRETCHING ALONE IN SPASTIC DIPLEGIC CEREBRAL PALSY” A Dissertation Submitted in the partial fulfillment of the requirement for the Degree of MASTER OF PHYSIOTHERAPY With specialization in ADVANCED PHYSIOTHERAPY IN NEUROLOGY Submitted by (Reg. No: 27092403) Submitted to THE TAMILNADU DR. M.G.R. MEDICAL UNIVERSITY CHENNAI – 32 DEPARTMENT OF POST GRADUATE STUDIES SHANMUGA COLLEGE OF PHYSIOTHERAPY (AFFILIATED TO THE TAMILNADU Dr. M.G.R. MEDICAL UNIVERSITY) SALEM - 7, TAMILNADU MARCH – 2011 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I thank The Lord Almighty for giving me strength and wisdom in successfully completing this project. I must thank Dr. P.S. PANNEERSELVAM, M.S., MNAMS, F.I.C.S., F.A.I.S., F.C.C.P., Chairman, Shanmuga Institute of Medical Sciences, Salem, who provided me all the requirements to complete this project work. I am very grateful to our Program Director Dr. G. PREMNATH, M.S., (Ortho), who had been helpful as the needs demanded. I deeply express my indebted thanks to my Principal Mr. V. MURUGAN, M.P.T., (Orthopedics), Principal, Shanmuga College of Physiotherapy for his valuable guidance, encouragement and useful comments offered at every stage of work ardently towards the successful completion of project work. I deeply express my indebted thanks to my Project guide Mr. J.DHANDAPANI, M.P.T, (Neuro) Asst, Professor, Shanmuga College of Physiotherapy for his valuable guidance towards the successful completion of project work. I also express my gratitude to all the Staff Members of Shanmuga College of Physiotherapy, for leading me to this success.
    [Show full text]
  • Pediatric Rehabilitation Part 3: Assessment and Management Of
    PedsCases Podcast Scripts This is a text version of a podcast from Pedscases.com on “Pediatric Rehabilitation Part 3: Assessment and Management of Spasticity.” These podcasts are designed to give medical students an overview of key topics in pediatrics. The audio versions are accessible on iTunes or at www.pedcases.com/podcasts. Pediatric Rehabilitation Part 3: Assessment and Management of Spasticity Developed by Andy Le and Dr. Matthew Prowse for PedsCases.com. October 19, 2018. Table of Contents • Introduction to Spasticity (what is it, causes, exacerbating factors) • Complications and benefits of spasticity • Assessment of spasticity • Goal setting • Management of spasticity: non-pharmacologic vs pharmacologic (oral, injectable, intrathecal) vs surgical • Conclusion Introduction Hello, and welcome to PedsCases podcasts. My name is Andy Le and I am a medical student at the University of Alberta. This podcast was developed in conjunction with Dr. Matthew Prowse, the Program Director of the Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation at the University of Alberta. Today, we will be discussing the assessment and management of spasticity in pediatric patients. After listening to this podcast, the learner will be able to: 1. Understand the difference between spasticity and rigidity 2. Recognize complications of spasticity 3. Conduct a basic assessment of spasticity 4. List reasons for worsening spasticity 5. Recognize treatment methods for spasticity 6. Understand the importance of goal setting in the treatment of spasticity Case Let’s return to our previous case, where we met Jeremy, an 11 year old boy with cerebral palsy, specifically spastic diplegia. Due to the spasticity in his legs, his lower Developed by Andy Le and Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Combined Anterior and Posterior Lumbar Rhizotomy for Treatment of Mixed Dystonia and Spasticity in Children with Cerebral Palsy
    RESEARCH—HUMAN—CLINICAL TRIALS Combined Anterior and Posterior Lumbar Rhizotomy for Treatment of Mixed Dystonia and Spasticity in Children With Cerebral Palsy Walid A. Abdel Ghany, MD, BACKGROUND: Children with cerebral palsy (CP) can present with severe secondary PhD* dystonia with or without associated spasticity of their extremities. Mohamed Nada, MD* OBJECTIVE: To assess the outcomes of combined anterior and posterior lumbar Mahmoud A. Mahran, MD, rhizotomy for the treatment of mixed hypertonia in the lower extremities of children PhD‡ with CP. Ahmed Aboud, MD‡ METHODS: Fifty children with CP were subjected to combined anterior and posterior lumbar rhizotomies in a prospective study. Clinical outcome measurements were re- Moustafa G. Mahran, MD, corded preoperatively and were evaluated at 2, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. The PhD§ operative techniques were performed by laminotomy from L1-S1, and intraoperative Marwa A.A. Nasef, MD, PhD¶ monitoring was used in all cases. All patients underwent intensive postoperative Mohamed Gaber, PTk physiotherapy programs. Tamer Sabry, PTk RESULTS: Changes in muscle tone, joint range of motion, and dystonia were significant Mohamed H. Ibrahim, MD, (P = .000) at postoperative assessment visits. PhD# CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the potential of combined anterior and pos- Mohamed H. Taha, MD** terior lumbar rhizotomies to improve activities of daily living in children with CP and with mixed spasticity and dystonia. ‡ Department of *Neurosurgery, Ortho- KEY WORDS: Botulinum toxin, Cerebral
    [Show full text]