THE Worldof Birds Attaching Devices That Transmit And/Or Wild

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

birding birding briefs briefs otherwise be impossible to study. For miniature data loggers that simultane- instance, biotelemetry has been respon- ously recorded brain and blood tempera- Nine new Ramsar sible for several fundamental advances tures in ostriches. Following the surgery, sites in Uganda in our understanding of avian flight. By the ostriches were released back into the THE WORLDof birds attaching devices that transmit and/or wild. A few weeks later, the birds were ganda has added nine wetlands record information on heart rate, wing- recaptured and the loggers removed. Uto the List of Wetlands of Inter- beat and breathing frequency to birds as Ostriches, it would seem, do indeed keep national Importance designated under WANTED – ALIVE Ivory-bill update diverse as Barnacle Geese Branta leu- cool heads – the data from the loggers the Ramsar Convention, bringing the copsis on the Arctic tundra and Spotted revealed that they possess the capacity national total to 11 sites covering a owards the end of April 2005, While ornithologists dissect the Antbirds Hylophylax naivoides in Pana- to selectively cool their brains, and that total of 354 803 hectares. ‘This is a the ornithological world was Arkansas evidence, interesting develop- manian rainforests, ornithologists have brain temperature is regulated within wonderful step for conservation in stunned by the announcement ments are taking place elsewhere. been able to conduct detailed studies narrower limits than blood temperature. East Africa,’ said Achilles Byaruhanga, Tthat the Ivory-billed Woodpecker had Following a sighting in Florida of a bird of the physiology of flight. The physi- Impressive as recent technological Executive Director of NatureUganda, been rediscovered in eastern Arkansas, that they identified as an Ivory-bill, ological adaptations that allow penguins advances in biotelemetry may be, they the BirdLife Partner in Uganda. ‘The USA. An awe-inspiring bird with a Geoff Hill and his colleagues mounted and other diving species to spend long fade in comparison to those that are on wetlands are home to spectacular wingspan of more than 75 centimetres, an intensive year-long search. They periods of time underwater, often at the horizon. Plans are being developed wildlife like Shoebill, Papyrus Gonolek, the Ivory-bill was believed to have reported seeing Ivory-bills 14 times, remarkable depths, have similarly been in North America that will involve NASA sitatunga and black-and-white colobus been extinct in North America since and recorded just over 300 instances uncovered largely through biotelemetry- launching an additional radio telescope monkeys, whose presence ensures a the 1940s. News of the rediscovery of calls that match written descriptions based research. into orbit around the earth. Unlike other thriving tourism industry, which is vital galvanised birders and conservation- of Ivory-bill vocalisations. The Hill to the local economy.’ ists worldwide, and triggered a massive team also found other intriguing signs, The nine newly designated sites species recovery programme with including a number of fresh cavities range from Uganda’s largest tract of funding of more than $10-million that are substantially larger than those swamp forest to extensive papyrus from the US Government. excavated by Pileated Woodpeckers, beds and an impressive waterfall Reaction from the scientific com- but fall within the range reported for system. They are: Lake Bisina, Lake munity, however, was more sceptical. Ivory-bills. Mburo–Nakivali, Lake Nakuwa, Lake The evidence presented by the team Do Ivory-billed Woodpeckers still exist Opeta, Lutembe Bay, Mabamba responsible for the rediscovery con- in North America? The answer seems Bay, Murchison Falls–Albert Delta, sisted of a very blurred video recording to be ‘probably’. For Ivory-bill search Nabajjuzi and Sango Bay–Musambwa of a large woodpecker. Several promi- teams, the Holy Grail is a photograph of Island–Kagera. Lake Opeta is home to nent ornithologists disputed the sufficient quality to confirm the bird’s Fox’s Weaver, Uganda’s only endemic identification of the bird in the video as identity beyond all doubt. Until such bird species, whilst up to 1.5 million an Ivory-bill. Among them was David an image is obtained, or the DNA from a migrant White-winged Black Terns visit Sibley, author and illustrator of a recent feather found in the field matches DNA Lutembe Bay, close to Kampala, the field guide to North American birds, extracted from museum specimens, nation’s capital city. Painting by Peter Hayman of an Ivory- who believes that the bird in the video ornithologists, conservationists and billed Woodpecker, from BirdLife’s Rare may well be a Pileated Woodpecker, a birders wait with bated breath. Bird Club collection. common species in the area. ANDREW McKECHNIE PETER RYAN Expedition to Tanzania’s Uluguru The transmitter attached to this juvenile Shy Albatross will reveal much about how it Mountains raises awareness spends its time at sea. A fascinating example of how bio- radio telescopes, pointed into the depths he Wildlife Conservation Society OUT OF THIS WORLD How biotelemetry reveals avian secrets telemetry can reveal the ways in which of space to detect and amplify weak Tof Tanzania (WCST, BirdLife in birds cope with challenging environ- signals from light-years away, this one Tanzania) organised two birdwatch- ne might imagine, perhaps, that the future effects of climate change (see smallest birds, and even to large insects ments is provided by recent work on will face downwards, towards the earth. ing expeditions to the North Uluguru the average ornithologist spends Africa – Birds & Birding, 10(5): 52–60). such as locusts and moths. Advances ostriches in South Africa. For animals Dubbed the Extra-terrestrial Biological Mountains and Pugu Forests Impor- most of his time observing birds Some of the most impressive applica- in biotelemetry have also involved the living in hot areas, a key requirement for Observatory, this radio telescope will be tant Bird Areas (IBAs), as part of the Othrough a well-used pair of binoculars or tions of new technologies to ornitholog- ways in which information is transmit- survival is that their brains, which are able to detect low-power signals from World Bird Festival celebrations. The poring over endless collections of speci- ical research have occurred in the field ted to researchers. Increasingly, radio- highly sensitive to heat stress, are kept tiny transmitters anywhere in the world, Uluguru team was lucky to see Ulu- mens in museum basements. In reality, of biotelemetry, the remote monitoring transmitters send signals not to receivers from overheating during hot weather and will completely revolutionise the guru Bushshrike Malaconotus alius, a ornithology has become a distinctly of birds using radio-transmitters and/or on the ground, but to orbiting satellites. and/or intense exercise. It is well known ways in which ornithologists and other Critically Endangered species endemic high-tech science, with a multitude of data loggers. A decade or two ago, the Satellite transmitters allow researchers that several large mammals solve this biologists keep tabs on their study ani- to the Uluguru Mountains. ‘These technological advances profoundly alter- size and weight of electronic circuits and to accurately track the movements of problem by selectively cooling their mals. Watch this space... expeditions will help raise conservation ing the ways in which the secret lives of batteries made biotelemetry a feasible species that regularly move long dis- brains and keeping brain temperature ANDREW McKECHNIE awareness amongst local people in the birds are revealed. For instance, comput- proposition only when working on rela- tances, such as penguins, albatrosses and below that of the blood reaching it Uluguru Mountains and Pugu Forests,’ ers with processing speeds and storage tively large species. Since then, these de- flamingos (see Africa – Birds & Birding, via the major arteries. A question that REFERENCE said Elias Mungaya, a participant on capacities undreamed of a decade ago vices have become progressively smaller 9(3): 14–15). remained unanswered, however, was Fuller, A., P.R. Kamerman, S.K. Maloney, G. the Uluguru trip. ‘Both places are are used in research facilities around the and more powerful, with the smallest Besides revealing birds’ exact loca- whether any birds had evolved a similar Mitchell, and D. Mitchell. 2003. ‘Variability in suffering from human encroachment,’ world to develop complex mathematical transmitters currently available weigh- tions, radio-transmitters and data loggers strategy. This mystery was solved when brain and arterial blood temperatures in free- he added. models of bird population fluctuations ing less than half a gram. These mini- can also be used to monitor aspects of a group of South African and Australian ranging ostriches in their natural habitat.’ Jour- BIRDLIFE INTERNATIONAL and increasingly realistic predictions of ature transmitters can be attached to the physiology and behaviour that would researchers surgically implanted nal of Experimental Biology 206: 1171–1181. 14 BIRDING BRIEFS AFRICA – BIRDS & BIRDING DECEMBER 2006/JANUARY 2007 BIRDING BRIEFS 15.
Recommended publications
  • Lake Opeta Wetland System Ramsar Information Sheet

    Lake Opeta Wetland System Ramsar Information Sheet

    Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS) Categories approved by Recommendation 4.7, as amended by Resolution VIII.13 of the Conference of the Contracting Parties. Note for compilers: 1. The RIS should be completed in accordance with the attached Explanatory Notes and Guidelines for completing the Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands. Compilers are strongly advised to read this guidance before filling in the RIS. 2. Once completed, the RIS (and accompanying map(s)) should be submitted to the Ramsar Bureau. Compilers are strongly urged to provide an electronic (MS Word) copy of the RIS and, where possible, digital copies of maps. LAKE OPETA WETLAND SYSTEM RAMSAR INFORMATION SHEET 1. Name and address of the RIS Compiler: Achilles Byaruhanga and Stephen Kigoolo NatureUganda Plot 83, Tufnel Drive, Kamwokya P. O Box 27034, Kampala - Uganda. Tel: 256 41 540719 Fax no: 256 41 533 528 E-mail: [email protected] 2. Date: 17 September 2005. 3. Country: The Republic of Uganda 4. Name of the Ramsar site: Lake Opeta Wetland System 5. Map of the Ramsar site: Hard copy: attached Digital (electronic) format: yes 6. Geographical coordinates: 34004" - 34024" E and 01033" - 01051" N,. 7. General Location: Lake Opeta and its surrounding swamps is located in north eastern Uganda, in four districts of Nakapiripirit (Namalu sub-county and Lorachat sub-county), Sironko (Bunambutye sub- county), Katakwi (Usuku county, Magoro sub-county) and Kumi (Kolir sub-county, Malera sub-county and Ongino sub-county). It is located 25 kms from Kumi town and the northern part borders a Wildlife Reserve, Pian-Upe Wildlife Reserve and Teso Community Reserve.
  • Important Bird Areas in Uganda. Status and Trends 2008

    Important Bird Areas in Uganda. Status and Trends 2008

    IMPORTANT BIRD AREAS IN UGANDA Status and Trends 2008 NatureUganda The East Africa Natural History Society Important Bird Areas in Uganda Status and Trends 2008 Compiled by: Michael Opige Odull and Achilles Byaruhanga Edited by: Ambrose R. B Mugisha and Julius Arinaitwe Map illustrations by: David Mushabe Graphic designs by: Some Graphics Ltd January 2009 Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non commercial purposes is authorized without further written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Production of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written notice of the copyright holder. Citation: NatureUganda (2009). Important Bird Areas in Uganda, Status and Trends 2008. Copyright © NatureUganda – The East Africa Natural History Society About NatureUganda NatureUganda is a Non Governmental Organization working towards the conservation of species, sites and habitats not only for birds but other taxa too. It is the BirdLife partner in Uganda and a member of IUCN. The organization is involved in various research, conservation and advocacy work in many sites across the country. These three pillars are achieved through conservation projects, environmental education programmes and community involvement in conservation among others. All is aimed at promoting the understanding, appreciation and conservation of nature. For more information please contact: NatureUganda The East Africa Natural History Society Plot 83 Tufnell Drive, Kamwokya. P.O.Box 27034, Kampala Uganda Email [email protected] Website: www.natureuganda.org DISCLAIMER This status report has been produced with financial assistance of the European Union (EuropeAid/ ENV/2007/132-278. The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of Birdlife International and can under no normal circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the European Union.
  • Important Bird Areas: Towards Implement Aichi Targets 11

    Important Bird Areas: Towards Implement Aichi Targets 11

    Important Bird Areas: Towards Implement Aichi Targets 11 CBD workshop, Livingstone Zambia Meeting Aichi Target 11 • A key element of Aichi Target 11 is the call to increase the coverage of P.A • Areas of biologically significant should be a priority when expanding P.A coverage • How can the key sites be identified? ‘Key Biodiversity Areas’ – sites of global significance for biodiversity conservation. Meeting Aichi Target 11 • KBA identify the most important sites for biodiversity within a country or region • KBA are identified using globally standardized criteria • Inform the selection of sites for protection under national legislation www.ibat-alliance.org/ibat- conservation Meeting Aichi Target 11 Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas(IBAs) – are KBAs identified using information on birds Over 12, 000 IBAs have been identified, Mapped and documented by BirdLife International Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas www.birdlife.org/datazone Marine IBAs: the marine e-atlas 3000 sites in 150 countries and on high seas – 6.5% of the oceans IBAs are a basis for PA gap analysis PROTECTED AREA GAPS FOR UGANDA’S IBAS by Achilles Byaruhanga c/o NatureUganda, P. O. Box 27037, Kampala e-mail: [email protected] Uganda has 30 Important Bird Areas IBAs). 10 of the IBAs are national parks, 3 are wildlife reserves, 8 are forest reserves and 9 Analysis unprotected sites. Important Bird Areas contain significant populations of particular bird species that trigger their identification, and the IBA network Importance for birds ranked on a scale of 1-4 incorporates the existing Protected Areas network. In this analysis, IBAs have been used to obtain a better picture of where the important Rapid assessment of threats with scores ranked on a scale of 1-4 where; gaps really are in coverage for particular bird species.
  • National Nile Basin Water Quality Monitoring Baseline Report For

    National Nile Basin Water Quality Monitoring Baseline Report For

    Nile Basin Initiative Transboundary EnvironmentalAction Project National Nile Basin Water Quality Monitoring Baseline Report for UGANDA NILEBASIN INITIATIVE THE NILE BASIN TRANSBOUNDARY ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT BASELINE STUDY OF THE STATUS OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING IN UGANDA BY MOSES OTIM APRIL 2005 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES..................................................................................................... IV LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................ V LIST OF BOXES........................................................................................................ VI ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .....................................................................VII ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.......................................................................................VIII EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...........................................................................................IX 1.0 INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................16 1.1 THE NILE BASIN............................................................................................16 1.2 THE NILE BASIN IN UGANDA...............................................................................17 1.3 GEOLOGY .......................................................................................................19 1.4 MINERALISATION...............................................................................................21
  • Terrestrial Kbas in the Great Lakes Region (Arranged Alphabetically)

    Terrestrial Kbas in the Great Lakes Region (Arranged Alphabetically)

    Appendix 1. Terrestrial KBAs in the Great Lakes Region (arranged alphabetically) Terrestrial KBAs Country Map No.1 Area (ha) Protect AZE3 Pressure Biological Other Action CEPF ion2 Priority4 funding5 Priority6 EAM7 Ajai Wildlife Reserve Uganda 1 15,800 **** medium 4 1 3 Akagera National Park Rwanda 2 100,000 *** medium 3 3 3 Akanyaru wetlands Rwanda 3 30,000 * high 4 0 2 Bandingilo South Sudan 4 1,650,000 **** unknown 4 3 3 Bangweulu swamps (Mweru ) Zambia 5 1,284,000 *** high 4 3 2 Belete-Gera Forest Ethiopia 6 152,109 **** unknown 3 3 3 Y Bonga forest Ethiopia 7 161,423 **** medium 2 3 3 Y Budongo Forest Reserve Uganda 8 79,300 **** medium 2 3 3 Y Bugoma Central Forest Uganda 9 40,100 low 2 3 3 **** Y Reserve Bugungu Wildlife Reserve Uganda 10 47,300 **** medium 4 3 3 Y Bulongwa Forest Reserve Tanzania 11 203 **** unknown 4 0 3 Y Burigi - Biharamulo Game Tanzania 12 350,000 unknown 4 0 3 **** Reserves Bururi Forest Nature Reserve Burundi 13 1,500 **** medium 3 1 3 Y Busia grasslands Kenya 14 250 * very high 4 1 2 Bwindi Impenetrable National Uganda 15 32,700 low 1 3 3 **** Y Park 1 See Basin level maps in Appendix 6. 2 Categorised * <10% protected; ** 10-49% protected; *** 50-90% protected: **** >90% protected. 3 Alliaqnce for Zero Extinction site (Y = yes). See section 2.2.2. 4 See Section 9.2. 5 0 – no funding data; 1 – some funding up to US$50k allocated; 2 – US$50-US$250k; 3 – >US$250k.
  • Integrating Natural Capital Into Sustainable Development Decision-Making in Uganda

    Integrating Natural Capital Into Sustainable Development Decision-Making in Uganda

    Integrating Natural Capital into Sustainable Development Decision-Making in Uganda A project funded by the UK Government Fisheries Resources Accounts for Uganda March 2021 Copyright: National Environment Management Authority National Environment Management Authority (NEMA) NEMA House Plot 17/19/21 Jinja Road P.O. Box 22255 Kampala, Uganda Email: [email protected] Website: www.nema.go.ug Citation: NEMA (2021), Fisheries Resources Accounts for Uganda, ISBN: 978-9970-881-47-5 Editorial team Francis Sabino Ogwal NEMA Editor-in-Chief Dr Victoria Tibenda NaFIRRI Lead Reviewer Eugene Telly Muramira NEMA Consultant Agaton Mufubi NEMA Consultant Paul Okello UBOS Quality Assurance Steve King UNEP-WCMC Editor Mark Eigenraam IDEEA Group Editor Tom Geme NEMA Editor “Integrating Natural Capital Accounting into Sustainable Development Development Decision-making in Uganda” is a project funded by the Darwin Initiative through the UK Government, and implemented by the National Environmental Management Authority (NEMA), Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBoS) and National Planning Authority (NPA) in Uganda, in collaboration with the UN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC), the International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED) and the Institute for Development of Environmental-Economic Accounting (IDEEA Group). https://www.unep-wcmc.org/featured-projects/nca-in-uganda ii | P a g e TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD .............................................................................................................................................
  • Kidepo Valley National Park General Management Plan 2012-2022

    Kidepo Valley National Park General Management Plan 2012-2022

    MINISTRY OF TOURISM, WILDLIFE AND ANTIQUITIES (MTWA) UGANDA WILDLIFE AUTHORITY KIDEPO VALLEY NATIONAL PARK GENERAL MANAGEMENT PLAN 2012-2022 August 2012 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Uganda Wildlife Authority (UWA) prepared this General Management Plan with part funding from Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS). Consultations were held with all relevant stakeholders as shown in the appendices. Furthermore an analysis of stakeholders was done which gave guidance on the consultations made. Uganda Wildlife Authority highly acknowledges the communities and the entire Karamoja region leadership especially Kaabong, Kotido, Kitgum and Pader districts, who were bold enough in giving there proposals during the Planning process. Prepared by: Uganda Wildlife Authority, Planning Unit In put from: KVNP field staff, Senior UWA staff and stakeholders Guidance from: Uganda Wildlife Authority, Top Management members Drafted and edited by: Mr. Edgar Buhanga and Mr. Richard Kapere ii FOREWORD Kidepo Valley National Park (KVNP) started as the Kidepo Valley Game Reserve, which was established in 1958. Kidepo Valley National Park was 2 2 gazzeted in 1962, with an area of 1,259 km and, in 1967, 181 km of important dry season grazing habitat was added to the upper Narus catchment region of the park to maintain seasonal migrations. Establishment of the National park did not immediately stop traditional hunting and occupation of these areas. In the late 1970‟s, automatic weapons became more widespread in Karamoja as Amin‟s defeated army moved through the area. Coupled with two years of drought, people displaced as a result of famine took to poaching and the killing of wildlife accelerated significantly. Despite this, great effort has been made to reduce poaching with the assistance of the Karamoja disarmament program.
  • New Bird Species for Uganda at Lutembe Bay. Newsletter

    New Bird Species for Uganda at Lutembe Bay. Newsletter

    The Newsletter The NaturalistVo l: 15.1 January - April 2011 NatureUganda holds its 18th Annual General Meeting Two new Collaborative Forest Management agreements in Kasyoha Kitomi CFR An innocent soul given a death sentence ESD Day Celebrations in Kisumu Kenya. Unusual Sightings Dec 2010 - Apr 2011 New bird species for Uganda at Lutembe Bay. Aloe tororoana (Reynolds) of the study were to: A new migrant species, The is a vulnerable species both Great Knot was recorded at (i) Determine population patterns internationally and within Uganda. Lutembe Bay on 8th December It was previously recorded to occur and distribution of the species, 2010 by a NatureUganda (NU) only on Tororo Rock, specifically on (ii) Monitor phenology patterns of monitoring team. This was during rock cliffs at the hill summit. Study the species, the monthly counts that started by the researche rs in Busitema in 2009. (iii) Uiniversity and Islamic University Document indigenous Since 1994, NU has been In Uganda (IUIU) investigated the knowledge and use of the conducting biannual Waterfowl counts at 33 sites usually in distribution, population pattern, species and January and July of every phenology, use and conservation (iv) Document threats to the year. However in 2009, monthly status of endemic Aloe tororoana survival of the species. counts were started at Lutembe (Reynolds) in Tororo District, Eastern and Nakiwogo bays and NU Uganda. has been able to accumulate information on migration, feeding The study was led by Dr. Edward and roosting patterns of both Andama of Busitema University. Palearctic migrants and resident Other members included Ms species of these two sites.
  • The Lake Nabugabo Wetlands System Ramsar Site Management Plan ( 2017 - 2027 )

    The Lake Nabugabo Wetlands System Ramsar Site Management Plan ( 2017 - 2027 )

    THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA MINISTRY OF WATER AND ENVIRONMENT THE LAKE NABUGABO WETLANDS SYSTEM RAMSAR SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN ( 2017 - 2027 ) THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA MINISTRYMINISTRY OF OFWATER WATER ANDAND ENVIRONMENT ENVIRONMENT THE LAKE NABUGABO WETLAND SYSTEM THE LAKERAMSAR NABUGABO SITE MANAGEMENT WETLANDS PLAN SYSTEM RAMSAR SITE(2017 MANAGEMENT - 2027) PLAN ( 2017 - 2027 ) APPROVALS This Management Plan has been reviewed by the sub-county leaders, district leaders and wetland stakeholders, and has been approved for implementation on the 16th of June 2017. ……………………………………………… Hon. Samuel Cheptoris Minister of Water and Environment ……………………………………… ……………………………………… District Chairperson District Chairperson Masaka District Local Government Kalungu District Local Government ……………………………………….. ……………………………………... District Chairperson District Chairperson Mpigi District Local Government Gomba District Local Government ……………………………………….... District Chairperson Butambala District Local Government iv The Lake Nabugabo Wetland System Ramsar Site Management Plan ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This management plan has been developed in a consultative and transparent process in which the views of all stakeholders I would like to thank the staff were captured in order to ensure ownership of the plan and of the Ministry of Water and sustainability. It was made possible by different players who Environment, especially from contributed based on expertise, experience, and interest. the wetland management I am honored to thank all of those that made the process for this department, for their technical management plan a success. In this regard, I would like to thank and policy guidance. Special the staff of the Ministry of Water and Environment, especially tribute goes to Nature Uganda from the wetland management department, for their technical for leading the process and policy guidance. Special tribute goes to Nature Uganda for and playing the role of the leading the process and playing the role of the secretariat for the secretariat for the National National Task Force.
  • LUTEMBE BAY WETLAND COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN Lutembe Bay Wetland Users Association

    LUTEMBE BAY WETLAND COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN Lutembe Bay Wetland Users Association

    LUTEMBE BAY WETLAND COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN Lutembe Bay Wetland Users Association LUTEMBE BAY WETLAND COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN Lutembe Bay Wetland Users Association i LUTEMBE BAY WETLAND COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN Lutembe Bay Wetland Users Association Katabi and Ssisa Sub-Counties, Wakiso District Supported by BirdLife International, NatureUganda and the Aage V. Jensen Charity Foundation Through: The Local Community Empowerment Project September 2014 LUTEMBE BAY WETLAND COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN ii Lutembe Bay Wetland Users Association TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES iv LIST OF FIGURES iv LIST OF ACRONYMS iv BACKGROUND 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Justification 1 2.0 SITE AND COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT 2 2.1 Site description 2 2.1.1 Location and Boundary 2 2.1.2 Official protection/management status 4 2.1.3 Tenure/Ownership 4 2.1.4 Biodiversity importance, status and trends 4 2.1.5 Physical Features 5 2.1.6 Current Land Use 5 2.2 Natural resources and their use 5 2.2.1 Location and distribution of resources 6 2.2.2 Access, Management and use of Natural Resources 6 2.2.4 Seasonal patterns of resource availability and use 7 2.2.5 Threat Assessment/ hazard mapping 7 2.2.6 Livelihoods Vulnerability assessment 8 2.2.7 Conservation measures taken 8 2.3.1 Community Structure, Organisation and Processes 9 2.3.2 Name, location and resources 9 2.3.3. Objectives of the Community group 10 2.3.4 Current status of the community 10 2.4 External Stakeholders and their Roles 10 3.0 Plan of Action 11 3.1 Background 11 3.2 Methods and Participants 11 3.2.1 Methods 11 3.2.2 Tools 11 3.2.3 Participants 13 3.3 Vision 13 3.4.
  • THE ROLE of INTERNATIONAL CONVENTIONS in PROTECTION of SPECIES: a CASE of RAMSAR SITES in UGANDA Achilles Byaruhanga, Michael Opige Natureuganda P

    THE ROLE of INTERNATIONAL CONVENTIONS in PROTECTION of SPECIES: a CASE of RAMSAR SITES in UGANDA Achilles Byaruhanga, Michael Opige Natureuganda P

    THE ROLE OF INTERNATIONAL CONVENTIONS IN PROTECTION OF SPECIES: A CASE OF RAMSAR SITES IN UGANDA Achilles Byaruhanga, Michael Opige NatureUganda P. O. Box 27034, Kampala Paul Mafabi. Wetlands Management Department, Kampala Fig.1 Ramsar Sites In Uganda ABSTRACT Uganda ratified the Ramsar Convention in 1988 and since then the country has made significant progress in implementing the principles of the convention. Parties to the Ramsar Convention are expected to demonstrate their commitments to wetland management through three ‘pillars’ of action: ‘wise – or sustainable - use of wetlands; identification of internationally important wetlands for inclusion in the Ramsar List; and the international cooperation and sharing of information and expertise. After acceding to the treaty in 1988, Uganda listed the Lake George Ramsar site. A second site, Lake Nabugabo, was added to the list in February 2004. Since then, nine sites have been gazetted in September 2006. Today Uganda has eleven Ramsar sites covering a total area of 354,803 hectares. Uganda contains an extensive and varied wetlands network that covers around 13% (30,680 sq. km) of the country’s land area of which Ramsar sites cover 12%. The Government of Uganda developed the Wetland Albert Nile Policy in 1995 which set out strategies for wetland use and an assessment in 2001indicated that 39% of the Ugandan population was aware of the functions and benefits provided by wetlands. The 11 Ramsar sites in Uganda may conserve 87% of the total wetland bird species (W, w) of Uganda based on the distribution records of species and 82% of globally threatened wetland species.
  • Important Bird Areas in Uganda Status and Trends 2010

    Important Bird Areas in Uganda Status and Trends 2010

    Series No. 6 Important Bird Areas in Uganda Status and Trends 2010 May 2011 Compiled by: Compiled by: Edited by: Michael Opige Odull Micheal Opige Odull Julius Arinaitwe Achilles Byaruhanga Achilles Byaruhanga Thandiwe Chikomo George Eshiamwata Important Bird Areas in Uganda Status and Trends May 2011 Edited by: Julius Arinaitwe Thandiwe Chikomo Goerge Eshiamwata Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non commercial purposes is authorized only with further written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Production of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written notice of the copyright holder. Citation: NatureUganda (2011). Important Bird Areas in Uganda, Status and Trends Report 2010. Copyright © NatureUganda – The East Africa Natural History Society P.O.Box 27034, Kampala Uganda Plot 83 Tufnel Drive Kamwokya. Email [email protected] Website: www.natureuganda.org Important Bird Areas in Uganda CONTENTS Acknowledgments iv Executive summary v List of acronyms vi Chapter one 8 1. Introduction 8 Chapter two 10 2. Methods 10 Chapter Three 11 3. Results and discussions 11 Chapter four 28 4. Bird Population Monitoring (BPM) Scheme 28 Chapter Five 30 5. Conclusions 30 Chapter Six 31 6. Recommendations 21 Appendices 32 iv May 2011 Status and Trends 2010 Acknowledgments Much appreciated are the technical support from both RSPB and BirdLife Africa Partnership Secretariat (BLAPS) especially Thandiwe Chikomo, Julius Arinaitwe and Ademola