History of Suspended-Sediment Data Collection and Inventory of Available Data for the Tennessee and Cumberland River Basins

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

History of Suspended-Sediment Data Collection and Inventory of Available Data for the Tennessee and Cumberland River Basins HISTORY OF SUSPENDED-SEDIMENT DATA COLLECTION AND INVENTORY OF AVAILABLE DATA FOR THE TENNESSEE AND CUMBERLAND RIVER BASINS U.S. GEOLOGICAL SU Open-File Report 88-4 Prepared in cooperation with the TENNESSEE TECHNOLOGICAL UNIWRSITY HISTORY OF SUSPENDED-SEDIMENT DATA COLLECTION AND INVENTORY OF AVAILABLE DATA FOR THE TENNESSEE AND CUMBERLAND RIVER BASINS By William P. Carey, Russell T. Brown, and Carrie G. Chatham U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open-File Report 88-497 Prepared in cooperation with the TENNESSEE TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY Nashville, Tennessee 1988 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL HODEL, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For a&i&&al infomration write to: Copiesof this sport can bepurcharedfrom: District Chief U.S. GeologicalSurvey U.S. GeologicalSurvey Booksand Open-File Reports Services A-413 Federal Bldg. FederalCenter, Bldg. 810 - U.S. Courthouse Box 25425 ’ Nashville,TN 37203 Denver,CO 80225 CONTENTS Abstract 1 Introduction 1 History of suspended-sediment data collection 2 Tennessee River basin 2 TVA data 2 Geological Survey data 7 Cumberland River basin 9 Sampling methods and samplers used 10 History of reservoir construction 13 Data inventory 13 Previous inventories 13 Inventory tables 15 Individual station comments 15 Tennessee River basin 33 Cumberland River basin 44 Other sources of sediment related data 47 Reservoir-accumulation data 47 Turbidity data 47 Summary 49 Selected references 50 ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1. Map showing location of dailysediment sampling stations in the Tennessee and Cumberland River basins 4 2. Graph showing number of samplesper station in the Tennessee River basin 8 3. Graph showing number of samples per station in the Cumberland River basin 10 4. Photograph showing TVA suspended-sedimentsampler used prior to 1943 11 5. Graph showing sediment yield in the Tennessee River basin 48 TABLES Table 1. Chronological listing of reservoirs constructed in the TennesseeRiver basin 14 2. Summary of suspended-sediment data in the Tennessee River basin 16 3. Summary of suspended-sediment data in the Cumberland River basin 27 . ill CONVERSiON FACTORS For those readers who may prefer to use metric units rather than inch-pound units, conversion factors for the terms used in this report are listed below: Multiply inch-pound units BY To obtain metric units acre-foot (acre-ft) 1,234 cubic meter (m ) foot (ft) 0.3048 meter (m) mile (mi) 1.609 kilometer (km) square mile (mi2) 2.590 square kilometer ( km2) pound (lb) 0.4536 kilogram (kg) ton, short 0.9078 megagrams (Mg) cubic foot per second (f$/s) 0.02832 cubic meter per second (m’/s) iv HISTORY OF SUSPENDED-SEDIMENT DATA COLLECTION AND INVENTORY OF AVAILABLE DATA FOR THE TENNESSEE AND CUMBERLAND RIVER BASINS by William P. Carey, Russell T. Brown, and Carrie G. Chatham ABSTRACT for various periods on 17 basins ranging in size from 0.67 to 1,977 square miles, with the earliest Since the early 1930’s, a considerable date of daily record being October 1953. All of amount of suspended-sediment data has been these daily stations are located in the upper Gum- collected in the Tennessee and Cumberland berland River basin upstream of any major im- River basins, primarily by the Tennessee Valley poundments. Authority and the U.S. Geogical Survey. These data setscover a wide range of drainage areasand Periodic sediment data have been collected sampling frequencies. The most valuable data by the U.S. Geological Survey at 194 stations in sets are those where the frequency of sampling the TennesseeRiver basin and at 106 stations in was sufficient to compute daily sediment records. the Cumberland River basin, however, the num- ber of samples per station is quite low. Eighty- In 1934 and 1935, the Tennessee Valley six percent of the periodic stations in the Authority established 5 1 daily record suspended- Tennessee River basin and 91 percent of the pe- sediment stations on the TennesseeRiver and its riodic stations in the Cumberland River basin major tributaries. Most of these stations were have 30 samples or less. operated for 3 to 4 years, but nine of the stations were operated for 8 years. From 1962 to 1965, the Tennessee Valley Authority again collected INTRODUCTION daily sediment record at 10 of the original 5 1 sta- tions. In addition to the data sets collected on Documented attempts to determine the the major rivers, the TennesseeValley Authority concentration of suspended solids in water has conducted several intensive studies of small samples obtained from the Cumberland and watersheds throughout the Tennessee River TennesseeRiver basins date back to an investiga- Basin. tion of water quality in the eastern United States by the U.S. Geological Survey in 1905 and 1906 In the Cumberland River basin, daily sedi- (Dole, 1909). Since that time, a considerable ment records have been collected primarily by amount of suspended-sediment data has been the Survey. Daily stations have been operated collected in these two basins primarily by the 1 Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) and the able in machine-readable format; the number of Geological Survey. In a study of sediment yields observations is generally low; some lack cor- in these basins, Trimble and Carey (1984) found responding water-discharge data; and some of that data collected since 1960 had not been the data are proprietary. Therefore, it was inventoried and that a vast amount of data col- decided that this history and inventory would be lected by TVA was not readily available in com- limited to data that had been collected and puter storage. In 1985, the Geological Survey, in analyzed by generally accepted procedures as cooperation with the Tennessee Technological described by Guy and Norman (1970), and that University, began an effort to document the his- are readily available on the Geological Survey tory of suspended-sediment data collection in WATSTORE data base. These provisions essen- these basins and to enter most of the TVA data tially restricted consideration to the Geological into computer storage on the Geological Survey and TVA data sets. Survey’s National Water Data Storage and Retrieval System (WATSTORE). HISTORY OF SUSPENDED- The description of previous data-collection SEDIMENT DATA COLLECTION efforts not only provides necessaryinformation for the proper use and interpretation of the data, TENNESSEE RIVER BASIN but it also helps preserve valuable information pertaining to the history of hydrology in general TVA Data and to sediment studies in particular. This report presents a descriptive history of In 1933, when the TVA was created and suspended-sediment data collection in the Ten- began planning the development of the Ten- nessee and Cumberland River basins, but is nesseeValley (the Valley), there was very little restricted to data which are considered to be rep- information available on the sediment loads of resentative of cross-section mean concentra- rivers and streams in the Valley. The only data tions, and which are readily available in the readily available were from single vertical dip WATSTORE system. In recent years, the num- samples at two stations published in 1909 by ber of federal, state, and local agencies, plus Dole, and from sedimentation surveys of four universities and private consultants that have existing reservoirs. It was generally known that been collecting data on suspended solids has sediment loads in the Valley were relatively low, been constantly increasing. This was particular- particularly when compared to some western ly true in the late seventies and early eighties streams. However, more comprehensive data when many agencies, universities, consultants, were needed for TVA to estimate the useful lives and individual companies were collecting water- of the reservoirs being planned for the Valley. quality data including suspended solids in the coal-inining areas of the Tennesseeand Cumber- Realizing this need for information on land River basins. To attempt an inventory of all sediment loads, TVA began an investigation to of these data would be a monumental task of determine the amount of sediment transported questionable merit, becauseavariety of samplers by the TennesseeRiver and its major tributaries. and sampling schemeswere employed in collect- During 1934 and 1935, 51 suspended-sediment ing these data; the data are generally not avail- sampling stations were established on rivers and 2 streams in the Tennessee Valley (fig. 1). These March, and June 1934) and was moved to Hiwas- stations were located at or near the proposed see River above Murphy, N.C. (DA = 406 mi2) in sites of major reservoirs and on the larger May 1940, where it continued until May 1942. tributaries above proposed reservoirs. Where The remaining seven long-term stations are possible, the stations were located at or near Powell River near Arthur, Tenn., Valley River at Geological Survey stream-gaging stations. Tomotla, N.C., Nottely River near Ranger, NC., Samples were collected primarily during runoff Tennessee River at Chattanooga, Tenn., Ten- events, but a sufficient number of samples were nessee River at Hales Bar, Tenn., Tennessee collected between runoff events to allow TVA to River at Savannah,Tenn., and Tennessee River compute daily sediment discharge. The periods near Johnsonville, Tenn. of record for the sediment-sampling stations varied from 6 months at two stations to approx- Several of these long-term stations were imately 8 years at nine key stations. Most sta- operated to study the sediment-trapping charac- tions were operated for 3 to 4 years during the teristics of the reservoirs. Clinch River above interval from 1934 to 1942. During the period Tazewell and Powell River near Arthur provided from 1934 to 1938, some stations were moved, a measure of sediment inflow to Norris Lake some were discontinued, and some had sampling after it reached minimum pool elevation in start after 1935. Ultimately, different locations March 1936. Hiwassee River above Murphy, were sampled during this time period.
Recommended publications
  • Tennessee Fish Species
    The Angler’s Guide To TennesseeIncluding Aquatic Nuisance SpeciesFish Published by the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency Cover photograph Paul Shaw Graphics Designer Raleigh Holtam Thanks to the TWRA Fisheries Staff for their review and contributions to this publication. Special thanks to those that provided pictures for use in this publication. Partial funding of this publication was provided by a grant from the United States Fish & Wildlife Service through the Aquatic Nuisance Species Task Force. Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency Authorization No. 328898, 58,500 copies, January, 2012. This public document was promulgated at a cost of $.42 per copy. Equal opportunity to participate in and benefit from programs of the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency is available to all persons without regard to their race, color, national origin, sex, age, dis- ability, or military service. TWRA is also an equal opportunity/equal access employer. Questions should be directed to TWRA, Human Resources Office, P.O. Box 40747, Nashville, TN 37204, (615) 781-6594 (TDD 781-6691), or to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office for Human Resources, 4401 N. Fairfax Dr., Arlington, VA 22203. Contents Introduction ...............................................................................1 About Fish ..................................................................................2 Black Bass ...................................................................................3 Crappie ........................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • North Fork Holston River Report 2017
    North Fork Holston River 2017 From its origin in the southeast corner of Bland County, the North Fork of the Holston River flows more than 100 miles through Southwest Virginia before crossing the Tennessee State line near the community of Yuma. The river boasts an outstanding smallmouth bass population, and supports populations of many other fish species. Sport fish populations are sampled in the North Fork Holston River using boat- mounted electrofishing gear. This sampling equipment generates a controlled field of electricity around the boat that immobilizes the fish. The fish can then be collected with dipnets and placed in a livewell on the boat to recover. This method does not kill the fish, but only stuns the fish so that they can be collected, counted, measured and released. These population samples are typically conducted during April and May, when most fish are in shallow water. The relative abundance of each fish species is calculated as the number of fish collected per hour of sampling. This is also referred to as the catch rate or catch per unit of effort (CPE). The total length and weight of individual fish are measured to determine the condition of the fish and also to evaluate the size structure of the populations. A balanced size structure with representative numbers of both large and small fish is ideal. Mostly small fish in the population might mean that growth is slow or few fish are surviving to older ages. Mostly large fish in the population might mean that natural reproduction is lacking and there are not enough young fish being recruited to replace older fish that die.
    [Show full text]
  • Fifth Five Year Review Report
    FIFTH FIVE-YEAR REVlEW REPORT FOR SALTVILLE WASTE DISPOSAL PONDS SUPERFUND SITE SMYTH COUNTY, VlRGINIA SEPTEMBER 2017 Prepared by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 3 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania SEP 2 6 2017 Karen Melvin, Director Date Hazardous Site Cleanup Division U.S. EPA, Region III Table of Contents LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS & ACRONYMS .........................................................................................................2 I. INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................................3 Site Background .....................................................................................................................................................3 FIVE-YEAR REVIEW SUMMARY FORM ........................................................................................................6 II. RESPONSE ACTION SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................6 Basis for Taking Action .........................................................................................................................................6 Response Actions ...................................................................................................................................................7 Status of Implementation .......................................................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Hclassification
    Form No. 10-300 (Rev. 10-74) UNITED STAThSDhPARTMHNT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY -- NOMINATION FORM SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOW TO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS ____________TYPE ALL ENTRIES - COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS______ I NAME HISTORIC Long Island of the Holston AND/OR COMMON Long Island of the Holston LOCATION STREET& NUMBER South Fork of the Holston Elver _NOT FOR PUBLICATION CITY, TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT Kingsport __. VICINITY OF 1st STATE CODE COUNTY CODE Tennessee 047 Sullivan 16^ HCLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE ^DISTRICT —PUBLIC -^OCCUPIED X.AGRICULTURE —MUSEUM _ BUILDING(S) ^.PRIVATE —UNOCCUPIED X-COMMERCIAL —PARK —STRUCTURE —BOTH _ WORK IN PROGRESS —EDUCATIONAL ^r^RIVATE RESIDENCE —SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE —ENTERTAINMENT —RELIGIOUS —OBJECT _IN PROCESS •^TYES: RESTRICTED —GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC _ BEING CONSIDERED _ YES: UNRESTRICTED X-INDUSTRIAL —TRANSPORTATION X?NO _ MILITARY —OTHER: [OWNER OF PROPERTY NAME SEE CONTINUATION SHEET STREETS. NUMBER CITY, TOWN STATE __ VICINITY OF LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE, REGISTRY OF DEEDS,ETC. Registry of Deeds STREET& NUMBER Sullivan County Court House CITY, TOWN STATE Blountville Tennessee I REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE Inventory of Historic Assets DATE in progress — FEDERAL ?_STATE —COUNTY —LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS Tennessee Historical Commission CITY, TOWN STATE Nashville Tennessee DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE -EXCELLENT X&ETERIORATED east _UNALTERED X.QRIGINALSITE west -RUINS XALTERED _MOVED DATE. _FA)R _UNEXPOSED DESCRIBETHE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE Long Island of the Holston is located along the South Fork of the Holston River just east of the junction of the North and South Forks and immediately south of the city of Kingsport, Tennessee.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation of Alkali-Silica Reactivity in Four Dams in the Southeastern United States
    REC-ERC-89-4 Denver Off ice July 1989 U. S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation .._. INVESTIGATION OF ALKALI-SILICA JULY 1989 REACTIVITY IN FOUR DAMS IN THE 6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES D-3731 7. AUTHOR(S) 6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO. David Stark REC-ERC-89-4 9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS 10. WORK UNIT NO. Construction Technology Laboratories 5420 Old Orchard Road 11. CONTRACT OR GRANT NO. Skokie IL 60077 5-CP-81-06560 13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED 2. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS Bureau of Reclamation Denver Office Denver CO 80225 14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE DIBR 5. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES Microfiche and hard copy available from Denver Office, Denver, Colorado. Ed:REC 6. ABSTRACT This investigation of the alkali-silica reactivity of four dams in the southeastern United States supplements a similar study on five dams in southwestern United States. The investigations involved an onsite inspection and laboratory studies of concrete cores. The investigative procedures included petrographic examination, relative humidity measurements, length changes of cores exposed to moist air at 100 OF and to sodium hydroxide solution, and osmotic cell measurements. A comparison or observations on the southeastern and the southwestern dams is made. The manifestations of distress due to the reaction are similar, and the effects of alkali content of the cement, different types of reactive aggregates, surface drying, and climate exposure conditions are noted. 7. KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS . DESCR JPJORS-- *alkali-silica reactivity/ *alkali-aggregate reactions/ concrete/ concrete cores/ aggregates/ petrographic investigations/ concrete dam IDEN JIFfERS-- Fontana Dam, NC/ Hiwassee Dam, NC/ New Savanna Bluff Lock and Dam, GA/ Oliver Lock and Spillway, AL .
    [Show full text]
  • Mountain Memories
    Mountain Memories By Gene A. Morrell April 2014 2 Author’s note From December 1977 through January 1979, I wrote “Mountain Memories,” a weekly column, which was published in the Sullivan County News in Blountville, Tennessee. These local and family history columns were based on my research of published sources and on oral history derived from my interviews of a number of county residents, many of whom have since passed away. To the best of my knowledge, this is the first time that all the columns have been published at one time in a single publication. The columns are listed by the dates they were printed in the newspaper, and I have added a headline to each column to aid readers in quickly determining its topic. Hundreds of individual names and place names are mentioned in the columns, and, to aid readers in locating information of particular interest to them, I have included an index at the end of this book. Gene A. Morrell 3 December 15, 1977 Introduction History abounds in East Tennessee and, especially, Sullivan County. This is not just history as written in textbooks, or as constituted in established historical monuments, but is also the oral history of local communities that has been handed down from generation to generation. This history also includes family histories contained on the yellowing, aged pages of old family Bibles, letters from long forgotten relatives, and bits and pieces of papers with timeless notes of births, deaths, or marriages. Far too often these irreplaceable Bibles or other records have been thoughtlessly destroyed or lost.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service JANUARY 1993
    n ^ GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION OF MERCURY IN ASIATIC CLAMS, CORBICULA FLUMENEA, •i FROM THE NORTH FORK HOLSTON RIVER, VIRGINIA CHESAPEAKE BAY U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service JANUARY 1993 AKO UUI GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION OF MBRCORY IN ASIATIC CLAMS, CORBICPLA FLUMINEA. FROM THE NORTH FORK HOLSTON RIVER, VIRGINIA U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Environmental Contaminants Division Virginia Field Office White Marsh, VA 23183 Prepared by: Louis D. Seivard David A. Stilwell Stephen O. Rice and Kenneth R. Seeley Under the Supervision of: Karen L. Mayne, Supervisor Virginia Field Office and John P. Wolflin, Supervisor Chesapeake Bay Field Office • 1993 flR300J50 TABLE OP CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ............................. ii LIST OF FIGURES ............................ iii ABSTRACT ................................. iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................ v INTRODUCTION .............................. 1 MATERIALS AND METHODS .......................... 5 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ......................... 7 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ..................... 9 LITERATURE CITED ............................ 15 APPENDIX A LABORATORY QUALITY CONTROL INFORMATION AND ANALYTICAL METHODS .... A-l AR300I5 LIST OF TABLES PAGE Table 1. Historic and recent records of Federally listed species and candidate species in the North Fork Holston River, Virginia .......... 3 Table 2. Mercury concentrations in Asiatic clams, Corbicula fluminea, from the North Fork Holston River, Virginia, June 1990 ............. .10 Table 3. Summary statistics for methylmercury
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 South Fork Holston River Environmental Monitoring Studies
    2010 South Fork Holston River Environmental Monitoring Studies Patrick Center for Environmental Research 2010 South Fork Holston River Environmental Monitoring Studies Report No. 10-04F Submitted to: Eastman Chemical Company Tennessee Operations Submitted by: Patrick Center for Environmental Research 1900 Benjamin Franklin Parkway Philadelphia, PA 19103-1195 April 20, 2012 Executive Summary he 2010 study was the seventh in a series of comprehensive studies of aquatic biota and Twater chemistry conducted by the Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel University in the vicinity of Kingsport, TN. Previous studies were conducted in 1965, 1967 (cursory study, primarily focusing on al- gae), 1974, 1977, 1980, 1990 and 1997. Elements of the 2010 study included analysis of land cover, basic environmental water chemistry, attached algae and aquatic macrophytes, aquatic insects, non-insect macroinvertebrates, and fish. For each study element, field samples were collected and analyzed from Scientists from the Academy's Patrick Center for Environmental Research zones located on the South Fork Holston River have conducted seven major environmental monitoring studies on the (Zones 2, 3 and 5), Big Sluice (Zone 4), mainstem South Fork Holston River since 1965. Holston River (Zone 6), and Horse Creek (Zones HC1and HC2), the approximate locations of which are shown below. The design of the 2010 study was very similar to that of previous surveys, allowing comparisons among surveys. In addition, two areas of potential local impacts were assessed for the first time: Big Tree Spring (BTS, located on the South Fork within Zone 2) and Kit Bottom (KU and KL in the Big Sluice, upstream of Zone 4).
    [Show full text]
  • Hiwassee Geographic Area Updated: June 1, 2017
    Hiwassee Geographic Area June 1, 2017 **Disclaimer: The specific descriptions, goals, desired conditions, and objectives only apply to the National Forest System Lands within the Hiwassee Geographic Area. However, nearby communities and surrounding lands are considered and used as context. Hiwassee Geographic Area Updated: June 1, 2017 Description of area The Hiwassee Geographic Area is defined by large rivers running through broad flat valleys and two large lakes surrounded by mountains that provide distinct visitor experiences. The broad river valleys lie at lower elevations than other geographic areas in North Carolina’s National Forests. The steep mountains of this area support short leaf pine, mixed hardwood forests, and large pockets of eastern hemlock. Passing through a gentler mountain landscape, the major rivers of the region include the Hiwassee, Valley, and Nottley Rivers which flow into the Chatuge, Hiwassee, and Apalachia lakes. These rivers and the lakes created by Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) dams provide reactional opportunities for fishing, boating, and other water sports. The lakes of this geographic area form a chain that is home to a diverse number of plant, animal, and warm water fish species that are native to riparian floodplain ecosystems. Prior to European and Anglo-American settlement along with westward expansion, the Hiwassee geographic area was home to the Cherokee and Creek tribes. This area contains several landscape features that figure most prominently in Tribal history and have significant meaning to Tribal identities and beliefs. These locations are important traditional and ceremonial areas for the Cherokee. Communities within this geographic area include Murphy, Hayesville, Warne, Peachtree, Brasstown, Hiwassee Dam, Ranger and the smaller incorporated areas of Unaka and Violet.
    [Show full text]
  • Milebymile.Com Personal Road Trip Guide Tennessee United States Highway #11W
    MileByMile.com Personal Road Trip Guide Tennessee United States Highway #11W Miles ITEM SUMMARY 0.0 Terminus of US #11W at Terminus of US Route #11W at a junction with US #70/#11E in Knoxville, TN Knoxville, Tennessee, At this junction, US Route #11 splits into two arterial routes i.e. US #11E and US #11W and traverse through Tennessee before rejoining to create its original/parent US #11 at Bristol, Tennessee. Altitude: 971 feet 0.2 Intersection : Interstate Intersection Interstate Highway #40, in Knoxville, Tennessee, the Hwy #40 third-largest city in Tennessee, Interstate Highway #40 runs through the center of the city of Knoxville, Tennessee, Knoxville Zoo, a zoological park located just east of downtown Knoxville, Tennessee, lies nearby, access is through Exit 392 on I-40. Altitude: 942 feet 6.8 Old Rutledge Pike : Old Rutledge Pike, Mascot Road, Community of Mascot, Tennessee, a Mascot, TN community in Knox County, Tennessee, Altitude: 1047 feet 10.1 Old Mine Rd : Skaggston Old Mine Road, Old Rutledge Pike, Skaggston Community Park, The Comm. Park Chesterfield House, an antebellum house, in the Community of Skaggstown, Tennessee, in northeastern Knox County, Tennessee, is listed on the National Register of Historic Places, Altitude: 1020 feet 10.4 Idumea Rd : State Natural Idumea Road, House Mountain, a mountain located in Corryton, Area Tennessee, northeast of Knoxville, Tennessee, It is the highest point in Knox County, Its huge sandstone boulders, its wide variety of bird and plant life, and the spectacular views from its two peaks are popular among the visitors. Altitude: 981 feet 14.8 Indian Ridge Rd : Blaine, Indian Ridge Road, Blaine, Tennessee, a town in Grainger County, TN Tennessee, Blaine Public Library, Luttrell, Tennessee, a city in Union County, Tennessee, located near the junction of TN Highway #61 with TN Highway #131, Community of Corryton, Tennessee, an unincorporated community in northeastern Knox County, Tennessee, lies along TN Highway #331/Emory Road.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Ferry Crossings in the Development of the Transportation Network in East Tennessee, 1790-1974
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 12-1975 The Role of Ferry Crossings in the Development of the Transportation Network in East Tennessee, 1790-1974 Tyrel Gilce Moore Jr. University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Geography Commons Recommended Citation Moore, Tyrel Gilce Jr., "The Role of Ferry Crossings in the Development of the Transportation Network in East Tennessee, 1790-1974. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 1975. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/934 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Tyrel Gilce Moore Jr. entitled "The Role of Ferry Crossings in the Development of the Transportation Network in East Tennessee, 1790-1974." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Geography. John B. Rehder, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Leonard W. Brinkman Jr., Edwin H. Hammond Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Tyre1 Gi1ce Moore, Jr •• entitled tiThe Role of Ferry Crossings in the Development of the Transportation Network in East Tennessee, 1790-1974.
    [Show full text]
  • Bank Fishing
    Bank Fishing The following bank fishing locations were compiled by 4. Fish are very sensitive to sounds and shadows and can TWRA staff to inform anglers of areas where you can fish see and hear an angler standing on the bank. It is good without a boat. The types of waters vary from small ponds to fish several feet back from the water’s edge instead and streams to large reservoirs. You might catch bluegill, of on the shoreline and move quietly, staying 20 to 30 bass, crappie, trout, catfish, or striped bass depending on feet away from the shoreline as you walk (no running) the location, time of year, and your skill or luck. from one area to the other. Point your rod towards the All waters are open to the public. Some locations are sky when walking. Wearing clothing that blends in privately owned and operated, and in these areas a fee is re- with the surroundings may also make it less likely for quired for fishing. It is recommended that you call ahead if fish to be spooked. you are interested in visiting these areas. We have included 5. Begin fishing (casting) close and parallel to the bank these fee areas, because many of them they are regularly and then work out (fan-casting) toward deeper water. stocked and are great places to take kids fishing. If you’re fishing for catfish, keep your bait near the bottom. Look around for people and obstructions Bank Fishing Tips before you cast. 1. Fish are often near the shore in the spring and fall.
    [Show full text]