Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board AGENDA

Notice of Meeting: An ordinary meeting of the Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board will be held on:

Date: Monday 26 July 2021 Time: 10am Venue: Lyttelton Community Boardroom, 25 Canterbury Street, Lyttelton

Membership Chairperson Tori Peden Deputy Chairperson Tyrone Fields

Members Reuben Davidson Nigel Harrison Howard Needham Jamie Stewart Andrew Turner

Scott Winter

20 July 2021

Penelope Goldstone Manager Community Governance, Banks Peninsula 941 5689

[email protected] www.ccc.govt.nz

Note: The reports contained within this agenda are for consideration and should not be construed as Council policy unless and until adopted. If you require further information relating to any reports, please contact the person named on the report.

To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit: https://www.ccc.govt.nz/the-council/meetings-agendas-and-minutes/

Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

Page 2 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

Part A Matters Requiring a Council Decision Part B Reports for Information Part C Decisions Under Delegation

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Karakia Timatanga ...... 4 C 1. Apologies Ngā Whakapāha ...... 4 B 2. Declarations of Interest Ngā Whakapuaki Aronga ...... 4 C 3. Confirmation of Previous Minutes Te Whakaāe o te hui o mua ...... 4 B 4. Public Forum Te Huinga Whānui ...... 4 B 5. Deputations by Appointment Ngā Huinga Whakaritenga ...... 4 B 6. Presentation of Petitions Ngā Pākikitanga ...... 4

STAFF REPORTS A 7. Wairewa Reserve 3185 - Change in Trust ...... 11 C 8. Takapūneke Reserve Co-Governance Group Terms of Reference - Revision ..... 19 C 9. Urumau Diagonal Track proposal ...... 27 B 10. Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū/Banks Peninsula Community Board Area Report - July 2021 ...... 43

B 11. Elected Members’ Information Exchange Te Whakawhiti Whakaaro o Te Kāhui Amorangi ...... 72 Karakia Whakamutunga

Page 3 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

Karakia Timatanga

1. Apologies Ngā Whakapāha At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.

2. Declarations of Interest Ngā Whakapuaki Aronga Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant and to stand aside from decision making when a conflict arises between their role as an elected representative and any private or other external interest they might have.

3. Confirmation of Previous Minutes Te Whakaāe o te hui o mua That the minutes of the Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board meeting held on Monday, 12 July 2021 be confirmed (refer page 5).

4. Public Forum Te Huinga Whānui A period of up to 30 minutes will be available for people to speak for up to five minutes on any issue that is not the subject of a separate hearings process.

There were no public forum requests received at the time the agenda was prepared

5. Deputations by Appointment Ngā Huinga Whakaritenga Deputations may be heard on a matter or matters covered by a report on this agenda and approved by the Chairperson.

There were no deputations by appointment at the time the agenda was prepared.

6. Presentation of Petitions Ngā Pākikitanga There were no petitions received at the time the agenda was prepared.

Page 4 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board OPEN MINUTES

Date: Monday 12 July 2021 Time: 10am Venue: Little River Boardroom 4238 Christchurch-Akaroa Road, Little River

Present Chairperson Tori Peden Members Reuben Davidson Nigel Harrison Howard Needham Jamie Stewart Scott Winter

Minutes of Previous Meeting 12/07/2021

Penelope Goldstone Manager Community Governance, Banks Peninsula - 941 5689 [email protected] www.ccc.govt.nz

Item 3

To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit: www.ccc.govt.nz/the-council/meetings-agendas-and-minutes/

Page 5 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

Part A Matters Requiring a Council Decision Part B Reports for Information

Part C Decisions Under Delegation

Karakia Timatanga: Reuben Davidson

The agenda was dealt with in the following order.

1. Apologies Ngā Whakapāha Part C Community Board Resolved BKCB/2021/00050

That the apologies received from Andrew Turner and Tyrone Fields for absence, and from Howard Needham for lateness, be accepted. Nigel Harrison/Reuben Davidson Carried

2. Declarations of Interest Ngā Whakapuaki Aronga Part B There were no declarations of interest recorded.

3. Confirmation of Previous Minutes Te Whakaāe o te hui o mua Part C Community Board Resolved BKCB/2021/00051

Minutes of Previous Meeting 12/07/2021

That the minutes of the Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board meeting held - on Monday, 28 June 2021 be confirmed, subject to the following amendment:

Item 4.1 - Te Hapū o Ngāti Wheke Rāpaki – Proposed Non-Powered Vessel Area

Delete “Andrew Scott, General Manager” and insert “Isaac Fahey, representing” Item 3

Andrew Scott, General Manager Isaac Fahey, representing Te Hapū o Ngāti Wheke Rāpaki, spoke to the Board regarding the rūnanga approved resolution to support the left side of the Rāpaki boat ramp to the point of Otuherekio (Pony Point) becoming a non-powered vessel area. Reuben Davidson/Jamie Stewart Carried

Howard Needham entered the meeting at 10.11am during Item 4.1.

4. Public Forum Te Huinga Whānui Part B 4.1 Linda Sunderland – Friends of Akaroa Museum (FOAM) Linda Sunderland, representing the Friends of Akaroa Museum, spoke to the Board regarding funding for the Museum. She tabled a paper highlighting the concern of FOAM that the

Page 6 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

Museum budget had been cut in the recent Long Term Plan and would be reduced from the 2022/23 financial year. Part B

That the Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board:

1. Receive the information presented in the forum. 2. Refer the issues raised in the presentation to staff for comment. 3. Thanks Linda for her presentation. Attachments A Linda Sunderland - Friends of Akaroa Museum Public Forum Handout

5. Deputations by Appointment Ngā Huinga Whakaritenga Part B There were no deputations by appointment.

6. Presentation of Petitions Ngā Pākikitanga Part B There was no presentation of petitions.

7. Reserve Management Committee Meeting Minutes Community Board Resolved BKCB/2021/00052

Minutes of Previous Meeting 12/07/2021

(Original Officer recommendations accepted without change.) -

Part B

That the Banks Peninsula Community Board:

Item 3 1. Receive the minutes of the following Reserve Management Committees:  Okains Bay Reserve Management Committee – 8 June 2021  Lyttelton Reserves Management Committee – 3 May 2021 Jamie Stewart/Scott Winter Carried

8. Akaroa Museum Advisory Committee Community Board Resolved BKCB/2021/00053

(Original Officer recommendations accepted without change.)

Part B

That the Banks Peninsula Community Board:

Page 7 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

1. Receive the minutes of the Akaroa Museum Advisory Committee meeting on 23 June 2021. 2. Approve the appointment of Jymal Morgan as the representative of Ōnuku Rūnanga on the Akaroa Museum Advisory Committee. Nigel Harrison/Jamie Stewart Carried

9. Elected Members’ Information Exchange Te Whakawhiti Whakaaro o Te Kāhui Amorangi Part B The Board exchanged information on items of interest, including:

 Family Friendly Toilets in Lyttelton – this request was referred to the CSR process

 Lyttelton Rose Garden – issues around the maintenance of the garden should be referred through the CSR process

 Project Lyttelton – positive update on current projects

 Lyttelton Museum – update on progress

 Naval Point – public requests for information on the progress and design can be answered via Council’s online platform

 Urumau Reserve – staff are addressing reports of unauthorised track development

 Orton Bradley Park – 500 hectares of acquired land will be jointly owned by Ngāti Wheke, Orton Bradley Park Board and the Rod Donald Trust

 Godley House – questions from members on status of reply from Department of Conservation Minutes of Previous Meeting 12/07/2021

-  Local Government Forum – meeting attended by some members

 Lake Forsyth – members of the public had requested information on the lake becoming a wetland of national importance, resulting in it being a no fly zone for model aircraft

Item 3  Diamond Harbour Land Divestment – community inquiring about consultation plans

9.1 Graffiti - Torpedo Boat Museum Members questioned whether the graffiti on the Torpedo Boat Museum in Magazine Bay was new or whether it was graffiti that had been there for some time.

Part B

That the Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board:

1. Request information from staff on when the graffiti would be removed from the historic Torpedo Boat Museum in Magazine Bay.

9.2 Duvauchelle Water Supply

Page 8 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

Part B

The Board heard that a resident of Duvauchelle had questioned why water was still being carted by

tanker to supply the local scheme, and whether improvements to the weir in Pipers Valley Stream would help solve levels of supply.

That the Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board:

1. Request an update from staff on why water was still being carted by tanker to supply the Duvauchelle Water Supply. Attachments A Duvauchelle Water Supply Image 1 B Duvauchelle Water Supply Image 2 C Duvauchelle Water Supply Image 3

9.3 Akaroa Recreation Ground Floodlights Members questioned the ownership of the floodlights at the Akaroa Recreation Ground, and whether they were being repaired or updated as part of the LED streetlight programme.

Part B

That the Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board:

1. Requests information on the ownership of the floodlights on the Akaroa Recreation Ground. 2. Requests an update on the LED streetlight programme for Akaroa.

Minutes of Previous Meeting 12/07/2021

9.4 Akaroa Service Centre Reopening - Part B

That the Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board:

Item 3 1. Requests an update from staff on the timeline for when the Akaroa Service Centre will reopen in the old post office building.

9.5 Dyers Pass Road The Board heard that members of the public were still enquiring as to the end date of the Dyers Pass Road Improvements project.

Part B

That the Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board:

1. Requests an update from staff on the end date for the works on Dyers Pass Road.

Karakia Whakamutunga: Reuben Davidson

Page 9 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

Meeting concluded at 11.03am.

CONFIRMED THIS 26th DAY OF JULY 2021.

TORI PEDEN CHAIRPERSON

Minutes of Previous Meeting 12/07/2021

-

Item 3

Page 10 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

7. Wairewa Reserve 3185 - Change in Trust Reference / Te Tohutoro: 21/313829

Report of / Te Pou Dan Egerton, [email protected], Property Consultant Matua: General Manager / Miles McConway, General Manager Resources Pouwhakarae:

Item 7

1. Purpose of the Report / Te Pūtake Pūrongo 1.1 The property owned by the council identified as Part Reserve 3185 (the Land), located at 3370 Christchurch-Akaroa Road, Little River is held under a statutory trust established under the Reserves and Other Lands Disposal Act 1955. The purpose for which the land may be used or for which the income earned from the land is used is set out in that Act and is no longer relevant to the current circumstances. This report seeks a decision authorising staff to request that the Minister of Local Government approves a change in the purpose to one which is better aligned to the current circumstances and will provide future flexibility. 1.2 The decisions in this report are of medium significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. The level of significance was determined by consideration of the historical background of the Land, the interests of Iwi and their mana- whenua in relation to the Land, and that the decisions requested within this report are unique, as well as the Council’s Significance and Engagement Matrix.

2. Officer Recommendations / Ngā Tūtohu That the Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board recommends to Council that it: 1. Notes that: a. Part Reserve 3185, held within Record of Title CB8K/912, comprising 94.2128 hectares, as shown on the plan attached, is owned and held by the Christchurch City Council under a statutory trust established under section 21(4)(b) of the Reserves and Other Lands Disposal Act 1955. b. The purpose for which the land, and income from it, can be used as currently set out in the statute is “enabling the Corporation to erect drainage works by which the annually recurring losses and injury caused by the flood waters of Lake Forsyth may be prevented” c. This statutory purpose is no longer appropriate and aligned with the current circumstances. d. The purpose for which the property, and income from it, may be used can be changed utilising the provisions of the Local Government Act 2002 (LGA), specifically section 140(4)(a)(i)/(ii) relating to “Restrictions on Disposal of Endowment Property” which requires the Minister of Local Government’s consent. 2. Authorise staff to commence and conclude (including making application to the Minister of Local Government for approval) a change to the purpose of the statutory trust set out in the Reserves and Other Lands Disposal Act 1955 for Part Reserve 3185, held within Record of Title CB8K/912, comprising 94.2128 hectares (as shown on the plan attached) to “the general purposes of the Christchurch City Council”, or such other similar purpose as the Minister of Local Government may require.

Item No.: 7 Page 11 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

3. Delegates the authority to the Property Consultancy Manager to do all things that he considers necessary or expedient to implement the requested change.

3. Reason for Report Recommendations / Ngā Take mō te Whakatau Background and Issues 3.1 The Land, shown on plan attached (Attachment A), is presently held upon statutory trust by

Item 7 the Council for the purposes of enabling the Corporation to erect drainage works by which the annually recurring losses and injury caused by the flood waters of Lake Forsyth may be prevented as established under the Reserves and Other Lands Disposal Act 1955 in section 21(4)(b). 3.2 This purpose as defined in the statute sets out how the property and any income derived from it can be used. The current purpose is historic, very prescriptive and no longer relevant nor aligned to the current and future use and management of the Land. It is therefore proposed to change the purpose to “the general purposes of the Christchurch City Council”. This will better align the purpose with the current ownership and circumstances of the Land, as well as creating future flexibility. 3.3 The land is by itself not considered to be a strategic asset under the Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy, however it is a component part of the following strategic asset listed in that policy:  Community Facilities (Schedule One):  o) all waterfront land and facilities owned or operated by the Council, including wharves, jetties, slipways, breakwaters and seawalls; Current Use and Values 3.4 The Land has not generated an income for a number of years due to limitations imposed by Ministry of Primary Industries (MPI) on grazing where stock can access the lake. Lake toxicity has occasional health impacts on stock. Limited grazing occurs on roadside paddocks that are separated from lake access. The remainder of the parcel is retired from grazing and is now showing beneficial biodiversity recovery as a result. The shrublands are nationally important for being the finest example in the eastern South Island of a shingle beach ridge ecosystem. The shrublands present are highly representative of the original natural character. They are distinctive in their composition, being notably diverse with numerous species of native vines. No similar examples occur in the South Island, or nationally for that matter. Several rare and threatened species of flora and fauna are present. 3.5 Previously the Land has been grazed, however this is no longer possible without substantial fencing protecting the waters of Lake Forysth from stock; stock will also have a negative impact on the biodiversity benefits outlined in paragraph 3.4. 3.6 Historically there have been other uses of the land, including by the New Brighton Power Boat Club, and the holding of an annual national event based around model aircraft flying. These activities will be able to continue with the proposed change in trust purpose, noting that the New Brighton Power Boat Club has not utilised the area for number of years. 3.7 In recent years flood mitigation in relation to Te Roto o Wairewa/Lake Forsyth has improved with the opening of the canal to the sea somewhat negating the need for the original purpose of the Trust. The land presently has various protections/hazard overlays under the Council’s District Plan, specifically (detailed appended to this report): 3.7.1 The land is zoned Open Space Natural Zone

Item No.: 7 Page 12 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

3.7.2 Liquefaction Management Area 3.7.3 Sits within the Coastal Environment

3.7.4 Sits within an area of Natural Character in the Coastal Environment 3.7.5 Sits within an Outstanding Natural Landscape/Feature Area 3.7.6 Is of cultural significance to Ngai Tahu for:

Item 7

 Mahaanui Iwi Management Plan Silent Files and Kaitorete Spit  Nga Turanga Tupuna 3.7.7 Is a site of Ecological Significance 3.8 It contains multiple values that meets all 4 of the National Priorities for the protection of indigenous biodiversity:  It occurs on an acutely threatened land environment (National Priority 1)  Comprises coastal ecosystems (National Priority 2)  Shingle beach ridges are classified as naturally rare ecosystems (National Priority 3)  Supports multiple threatened taxa (National Priority 4) Conclusion and Preferred Option 3.9 There are a wide range of interests, uses and values for the land that were not historically evident when the statutory purpose was established. It has also become increasingly unlikely, impractical, and unfeasible that the Land will be used for the purpose for which it is held. It is therefore suggested that the purpose of the Trust should be changed in order to provide better alignment and greater flexibility to the Council in regards to the future use and management of the Land. 3.10 As such it is recommended that the Council apply to the Minister of Local Government under section 140(4)(a)(i)/(ii) of the Local Government Act 2002 (LGA), set out in section 8.2 to 8.5 of this report below, to approve a change to the purpose of the Trust to “the general purposes of the Christchurch City Council”. Future Considerations 3.11 The future ownership, use and management of this property is being reviewed in conjunction with Mana Whenua and particularly the local Runanga, Te Kete o Wairewa. One of the options being considered is the future transfer of the land. This will be the subject of a future options report to Council. The proposal which is the subject of this report to change the current purpose set out in the statute will not affect such considerations.

4. Alternative Options Considered / Ētahi atu Kōwhiringa 4.1 A consideration to continue to hold the land in the present manner, the status quo, does not provide the Council the flexibility to utilise the land in a manner which reflects the present day values and accordingly this option was discounted.

5. Detail / Te Whakamahuki 5.1 Council staff consider that any change in the purpose of the Trust is unlikely to have a material impact on any member of the public as the land will remain in the ownership of the Council. On this basis, staff have not undertaken any consultation with the general public in relation to the proposal to change the purpose of the Trust.

Item No.: 7 Page 13 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

5.2 With respect to Te Kete o Wairewa, they are considered to be an effected party due to the reasons outlined in paragraph 6.3 to 6.4 below. 5.3 Te Kete o Wairewa and Council have had numerous conversations regarding the proposed change, and they have indicated that they are in support of the proposal. 5.4 On this basis , it is considered that the Community Board and the Council have sufficient information in order to comply with section 78 of the LGA. Section 78 requires the Council to

give consideration to the views and preferences of persons likely to be affected, or to have an Item 7

interest in the matter. 5.5 The decision affects the following wards/Community Board areas: 5.5.1 Banks Peninsula.

6. Policy Framework Implications / Ngā Hīraunga ā- Kaupapa here Strategic Alignment /Te Rautaki Tīaroaro 6.1 This report does not support the . Impact on Mana Whenua / Ngā Whai Take Mana Whenua 6.2 The decision does involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does specifically impact Mana Whenua, their culture and traditions. 6.3 As part of any consideration to change the Trust conversations have occurred with the local Runanga, Te Kete o Wairewa; they have long expressed a desire to manage this land as they have a long affinity to the land. 6.4 The Runanga is supportive of the proposal. Climate Change Impact Considerations / Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Āhuarangi 6.5 As the change in how the land is held is principally an ‘on paper’ change there is no impact on climate change. Accessibility Considerations / Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Hunga Hauā 6.6 The public will still have access to the site.

7. Resource Implications / Ngā Hīraunga Rauemi Capex/Opex / Ngā Utu Whakahaere 7.1 Cost to Implement – estimated to be approximately $5,000. 7.2 Maintenance/Ongoing costs – no change 7.3 Funding Source – existing operational budgets.

8. Legal Implications / Ngā Hīraunga ā-Ture Statutory power to undertake proposals in the report / Te Manatū Whakahaere Kaupapa 8.1 Council has the ability to make a request to the Minister of Local Government approving the proposed change in the purpose for which the land is used or for which the income earned from the land is used through utilising the provisions set out under section 140(4)(a)(i) and(ii) of the LGA. The proposal in this report is legally compliant with this legislation.

Item No.: 7 Page 14 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

8.2 The Minister referred to in this section is the Minister of Local Government.

Item 7

Other Legal Implications / Ētahi atu Hīraunga-ā-Ture 8.3 This report has been reviewed and approved by the Legal Services Unit

9. Risk Management Implications / Ngā Hīraunga Tūraru 9.1 The change in trust does not present a major risk – any funds derived from the land will be able to be utilised as the Council sees fit. 9.2 The use of the land will not change from the perspective of the general public.

Attachments / Ngā Tāpirihanga No. Title Page A ⇩ Attachment A - map of Wairewa Reserve 3185 17

In addition to the attached documents, the following background information is available: Document Name Location / File Link

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance / Te Whakatūturutanga ā-Ture Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002). (a) This report contains: (i) sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and (ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement. (b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

Item No.: 7 Page 15 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

Signatories / Ngā Kaiwaitohu Author Dan Egerton - Property Consultant

Approved By Angus Smith - Manager Property Consultancy Bruce Rendall - Head of Facilities, Property & Planning Miles McConway - General Manager Resources

Item 7

Item No.: 7 Page 16 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

Reserve 3185

Item 7

Attachment A

Item No.: 7 Page 17

Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

8. Takapūneke Reserve Co-Governance Group Terms of Reference - Revision

Reference Te Tohutoro: 21/892007 Russel Wedge, Team Leader Parks Policy & Advisory, Report of Te Pou Matua: [email protected]

General Manager Item 8 Mary Richardson, General Manager Citizens and Community Pouwhakarae:

1. Purpose of the Report Te Pūtake Pūrongo 1.1 The purpose of this report is for the Community Board to approve a revision to the Takapūneke Reserve Co-Governance Group 2018, section 10, Terms of Reference (ToR). Section 10 relates to the process to approve reserve landscape plans, which needs to be changed since the Council’s Delegations Register was revised in 2019 (refer Attachment A). 1.2 The decision in this report is of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. The level of significance was determined by the minimal impact on the community and the Council.

2. Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu That the Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board: 1. Approve the revision to section 10 Terms of Reference, Ōnuku Rūnanga and Christchurch City Council Takapūneke Reserve Co-Governance Group, to replace the current text with: The Banks Peninsula Community Board’s involvement with Takapūneke Reserve is to include full consideration of the submissions received through the public consultation process and presented in the staff report when considering the adoption of the Takapūneke Reserve Landscape Master Plan.

3. Reason for Report Recommendations Ngā Take mō te Whakatau 3.1 The ToR adopted in 2018 require any submissions to the draft Takapūneke Reserve landscape master plan to be heard by a Hearings Panel and the Hearings Panel recommendation to be referred to the Community Board. The 2019 Council Delegations Register no longer requires submissions to a landscape plan to be heard by a Hearings Panel, the staff report to the Community Board can include the submission comments. The public can make a deputation to the Community Board meeting if they wish to talk to their submission.

4. Alternative Options Considered Ētahi atu Kōwhiringa 4.1 The ToR remain as they are – this is not recommended as it is not consistent with Council delegations. 4.2 A Hearings Panel requires elected members to hear submissions, debate and make a recommendation to the Community Board on whether or not to approve a landscape plan. A Hearings Panel requires considerable time, resources and funds to set up and operate. The change to the Council Delegations Register no longer requires a Hearings Panel for the approval of a landscape plan.

Item No.: 8 Page 19 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

4.3 The Community Board now has delegated authority to approve landscape plans after considering public submissions and comments through a staff report.

5. Detail Te Whakamahuki 5.1 The Ōnuku Rūnanga and Christchurch City Council Takapūneke Reserve Co-Governance Group ToR were endorsed at the Banks Peninsula Community Board meeting of 19/08/2019, the Community Board Resolved BKCB/2019/00105:

Item 8 Endorse the Terms of Reference for the Takapūneke Reserve Co-Governance Group as required by section 5.15 Co-Governance and National Reserve Status, Policy 4, Takapūneke Reserve Management Plan, adopted by Council (CNC:/2018/00112) on 7th June 2018. 5.2 The ToR, section 10 Banks Peninsula Community Board states: The Community Board’s involvement with Takapūneke Reserve is to include the approval to publicly notify the draft conceptual Landscape Master Plan for public consultation and submissions.

Any submissions to the draft conceptual Landscape Master Plan will be considered by a Hearings Panel. The Hearings Panel will hear the submissions and report to the Community Board with the revised draft conceptual Landscape Master Plan for the Community Board’s consideration and adoption. 5.3 The Council’s Delegation Register does not require the Community Board to give approval to publicly notify a draft landscape plan and the Community Board now has the delegated authority to approve and adopt a landscape plan instead of requiring a Hearings Panel. 5.4 The Council’s Delegation Register Dated 3 June 2021, Part D – Sub-Part 1 Community Board states:

5.5 The Banks Peninsula Community Board’s involvement with Takapūneke Reserve is to include the consideration of the submissions received through the public consultation process and presented in the staff report for the adoption of the Landscape Master Plan. Consultation 5.6 The Ōnuku Rūnanga as a partner of the Takapūneke Reserve Co-Governance Group endorsed the ToR prior to the staff report being presented to the Community Board meeting on 19/08/2019. 5.7 The Ōnuku Rūnanga have approved the proposed revision change to section 10, Terms of Reference. 5.8 At the Takapūneke Reserve Co-Governance Group meeting 23/06/2021 approved the proposed revision to section 10, Terms of Reference. 5.9 The decision affects the following wards/Community Board areas: 5.9.1 Banks Peninsula Community Board

Item No.: 8 Page 20 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

6. Policy Framework Implications Ngā Hīraunga ā- Kaupapa here Strategic Alignment Te Rautaki Tīaroaro

6.1 Ngāi Tahu Partnerships – Strengthening our relationship with the Papatipu Rūnanga, or local tribal councils in Canterbury, is vital to our region’s growth and cultural identity. 6.2 This report supports the Council's Long Term Plan (2021 - 2031):

6.2.1 Activity: Parks & Foreshore Item 8

 Level of Service: 6.8.1.2 Parks are provided managed and maintained in a clean, tidy, safe, functional and equitable manner- (Provision) - Regional Parks:20 ha/1000 people . Policy Consistency Te Whai Kaupapa here 6.3 The decision is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies in the Takapūneke Reserve Management Plan 2018. Impact on Mana Whenua Ngā Whai Take Mana Whenua 6.4 The decision does involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does specifically impact Mana Whenua, their culture and traditions. 6.5 Ōnuku Rūnanga as the mana whenua are partners on the Takapūneke Reserve Co-Governance Group and are fully involved in the planning and development of the landscape plan. The Rūnanga have given their approval to the proposed revision of section 10, Terms of Reference. Climate Change Impact Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Āhuarangi 6.6 There are no implications to climate change for the revision of section 10, ToR Accessibility Considerations Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Hunga Hauā 6.7 There are no accessibility considerations as a result of the revision of section 10, ToR

7. Resource Implications Ngā Hīraunga Rauemi Capex/Opex Ngā Utu Whakahaere 7.1 Cost to Implement – N/A 7.2 Maintenance/Ongoing costs – N/A 7.3 Funding Source - included in the parks planning operations

8. Legal Implications Ngā Hīraunga ā-Ture Statutory power to undertake proposals in the report Te Manatū Whakahaere Kaupapa 8.1 The Council Delegations Register Dated 3 June 2021, Part D – Sub-Part 1 Community Board. Other Legal Implications Ētahi atu Hīraunga-ā-Ture 8.2 There is no legal context, issue or implication relevant to this decision. 8.3 This report has not been reviewed and approved by the Legal Services Unit

9. Risk Management Implications Ngā Hīraunga Tūraru 9.1 There is no risk involved with revising the ToR to align it with the current Council Delegations Register.

Item No.: 8 Page 21 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga No. Title Page

A ⇩ Terms of Reference Onuku Runanga & Christchurch City Council Takapuneke Reserve 23 Co-Governance Group

Item 8

Additional background information may be noted in the below table: Document Name Location / File Link

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance Te Whakatūturutanga ā-Ture Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002). (a) This report contains: (i) sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and (ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement. (b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

Signatories Ngā Kaiwaitohu Author Russel Wedge - Team Leader Parks Policy & Advisory Approved By Kelly Hansen - Manager Parks Planning & Asset Management Andrew Rutledge - Head of Parks Mary Richardson - General Manager Citizens & Community

Item No.: 8 Page 22 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

Item 8

Attachment A

Item No.: 8 Page 23 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

Item 8

Attachment A

Item No.: 8 Page 24 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

Item 8

Attachment A

Item No.: 8 Page 25 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

Item 8

Attachment A

Item No.: 8 Page 26 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

9. Urumau Diagonal Track proposal Reference / Te Tohutoro: 21/641297

Report of / Te Pou Paul Devlin Matua: Head Ranger Banks Peninsula/Port Hills General Manager / Mary Richardson Pouwhakarae: GM Citizens & Community

Item 9

1. Purpose of the Report / Te Pūtake Pūrongo The purpose of this report is to update the Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū/Banks Peninsula Community Board on feedback from the Lyttelton Reserve Committee (RMC) on the proposed Diagonal Track development in Urumau Reserve and to seek a decision on its development. This report was requested by the Community Board following a briefing in February 2021 where staff were asked to investigate whether there is resource to make improvements to the Diagonal Track (proposed shared track on Development Plan (see Attachment A)) and if so to bring a report to the Community Board for approval. Report to include feedback from the Reserve Management Committee. The decisions in this report are of low significance in relation to the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. The level of significance was determined by low scores on all significance assessment factors except the level of community interest which scores medium.

2. Officer Recommendations / Ngā Tūtohu That the Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board: 1. Approve formalisation of the track indicated on the Urumau Development Plan and known as the Diagonal Track. 2. Request staff to upgrade the Diagonal Track in the 2021/2022 financial year for shared use by pedestrians and mountain bikes. 3. Request staff to engage independent shared use track building experts to peer review design concepts and provide both design and construction assistance. 4. Request staff to consider feedback from the Lyttelton Reserve Management Committee and incorporate requests into the design and implementation of the improved track, where appropriate.

3. Reason for Report Recommendations / Ngā Take mō te Whakatau The current informal track is a commonly used access point into Urumau Reserve. Complaints have been received by the Community Board about its condition over the years. As it is not seen as an official formed track the RMC do not maintain it. The RMC’s view is that the Diagonal Track is not an approved track on the Urumau Reserve Development Plan (see Attachment B) and wish the Community Board to make a formal decision on its development. The RMC have other priorities for track development and, despite demand, see the improvement of the Diagonal Track as a low priority that will distract them from other work.

Item No.: 9 Page 27 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

Staff acknowledge the other track work and will continue to offer support to the RMC with their work. Capital budget is available for the track development. It would not require physical input from the RMC as the work would be done by staff and contractors. Design of the track would take into consideration the RMC’s concerns around gradient, width, alignment and minimising any environmental impacts.

Item 9

4. Alternative Options Considered / Ētahi atu Kōwhiringa Leaving the track as is, do nothing. Disadvantages: Doing nothing will not address the complaints that have been received by the Community Board about the track condition and will likely result in continued dissatisfaction by users of the reserve. The RMC has requested staff to not carry out any work on it and whilst the RMC do no work on it, it has been occasionally cut by other local users. The track is likely to continue to be used and will become further degraded resulting in increased health and safety risks. Leave the track as is but include in a regular maintenance regime to be carried out by either staff or the RMC volunteers. Advantages: Staff could discuss with the RMC to carry out routine maintenance. Disadvantages: Issues may arise due to narrow width and little armouring of the surface so wear and tear and conflict would need to be managed. Defer improvements until the RMC are ready to action the work. Advantages: The RMC will have time to address and be more directly involved in the track development. Disadvantages: No firm date has yet been provided for when the RMC would be ready to develop the track. The track will continue to be overgrown and customer dissatisfaction will continue.

5. Detail / Te Whakamahuki The RMC has provided a letter from the Chairman (see Attachment C) with feedback on the Diagonal Track. It is unclear if this letter was formally approved by resolution through the committee. The letter states that the Diagonal Track is currently a low priority for the RMC and they have several areas of concern around design. Staff are confident that their specific concerns around design can mostly be alleviated through detailed design work by independent experts in which we would invite the RMC’s support. The RMC wish to continue with other programmed track works as a priority above this track. The proposed development of the Diagonal Track is supported by the local mountain bike club who have long asked for a formal access way into the reserve to be recognised. This dual use track would achieve that. Currently there is no formal access provided for bikes to enter or exit the reserve to utilise the extensive network of bike tracks that has been approved and developed. This decision affects the Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board.

6. Policy Framework Implications / Ngā Hīraunga ā- Kaupapa here Strategic Alignment /Te Rautaki Tīaroaro This report supports the : 6.1.1 Activity: Parks & Foreshore

Item No.: 9 Page 28 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

 Level of Service: 6.8.5 Satisfaction with the range and quality of recreation opportunities within parks. - Resident satisfaction with range and quality of recreation facilities within Parks: >= 85%. Policy Consistency / Te Whai Kaupapa here The decision is consistent with Council’s Plans and Policies. Impact on Mana Whenua / Ngā Whai Take Mana Whenua

Item 9 The decision does not involve a significant decision in relation to ancestral land or a body of water or other elements of intrinsic value, therefore this decision does specifically impact Mana Whenua, their culture and traditions. The development proposal was submitted to Te Hapu o Ngati Wheke who had no issues with the development and improvement of the track. Climate Change Impact Considerations / Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Āhuarangi No impact Accessibility Considerations / Ngā Whai Whakaaro mā te Hunga Hauā The improvement and development of the track in particular gradient, width and alignment will make it more accessible for dual usage.

7. Resource Implications / Ngā Hīraunga Rauemi Capex/Opex / Ngā Utu Whakahaere Cost to Implement - $10,000 to $15,000 Maintenance/Ongoing costs – minimal ongoing maintenance that will be absorbed into existing track maintenance costs. Funding Source – Port Hills Development Programme 2022 Other / He mea anō Not applicable.

8. Legal Implications / Ngā Hīraunga ā-Ture Statutory power to undertake proposals in the report / Te Manatū Whakahaere Kaupapa The Community Board has the delegation to approve track development under the following delegation: Approve the location of, and construction of, or alteration or addition to, any structure or area on parks and reserves provided the matter is within the policy and budget set by the Council. Other Legal Implications / Ētahi atu Hīraunga-ā-Ture There is no legal context, issue or implication relevant to this decision This report has not been reviewed and approved by the Legal Services Unit

9. Risk Management Implications / Ngā Hīraunga Tūraru There is existing work underway to clarify the understanding of delegations, management and governance that RMCs have. A decision to go ahead with the Diagonal Track development before the review of the RMC governance is completed may raise issues for the RMC.

Item No.: 9 Page 29 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

Not approving the development of the track may also further concern local users who are perplexed as to why the track cannot be improved especially as the impact on the workload of the RMC will be minimal.

Attachments / Ngā Tāpirihanga

No. Title Page Item 9

A ⇩ Approved Urumau Development Plan 31 B ⇩ Proposed Improvement of diagonal track from Rangers 32

C ⇩ DiagonalTrack Brian Downey letter 41

Additional background information may be noted in the below table: Document Name Location / File Link

Confirmation of Statutory Compliance / Te Whakatūturutanga ā-Ture Compliance with Statutory Decision-making Requirements (ss 76 - 81 Local Government Act 2002). (a) This report contains: (i) sufficient information about all reasonably practicable options identified and assessed in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and (ii) adequate consideration of the views and preferences of affected and interested persons bearing in mind any proposed or previous community engagement. (b) The information reflects the level of significance of the matters covered by the report, as determined in accordance with the Council's significance and engagement policy.

Signatories / Ngā Kaiwaitohu Authors Paul Devlin - Head Ranger Port Hills & Banks Peninsula Kelly Hansen - Manager Parks Planning & Asset Management Approved By Andrew Rutledge - Head of Parks Mary Richardson - General Manager Citizens & Community

Item No.: 9 Page 30 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

Item 9

Attachment A

Item No.: 9 Page 31 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

Diagonal Track - Urumau Reserve

The diagonal track is shown on the Urumau Development plan as a proposed shared track. Item 9 It’s already in place and is one of the most used tracks and is a common access point into the reserve for a range of users. The maintenance on this track is sporadic at times and complaints have been received around its condition.

The Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū/Banks Peninsula Community Board have asked for this report to be tabled again and a view sought from the RMC to then present back to the community board for a decision to be made on its improvement. A similar report was first provided in May 2019. This has been updated with more information. This project report covers, design, construction, environmental impact, consent requirements, a cost estimate and maintenance relating to the proposed track. 1. Design.

Attachment B The track measures 120 metres long, with a height gain of 13mtrs vertical. Track gradient would range between 6 to 10 degrees, with a couple of slightly steeper short sections. Final width of approx. 1.2 metres. Track alignment would have grade reversals incorporated to ensure that surface water cannot pick up speed and cause erosion problems. The track surface would have a slight out slope, to ensure water runs off to the outside edge and not down the track. 2. Construction. Construction would be achieved using a skilled track builder operating a 1ton digger. Conventional cut and fill technique would be used to form a new track surface following the existing line. The mineral earth surface could then be covered with SAP 20 gravel at a depth of 100mm. This would be shaped and compacted to form the final tread surface. The best time to carry out this work would be spring 2021 3. Consent requirements. We estimate that less than 50m3 would be moved to create the track. The City Council Planning Team have been contacted to check consenting requirements and they have reported that no consents are required based on the information provided. See appendix. 4. Environmental impact. The Parks Units Biodiversity team have provided an environmental impact assessment covering effects on flora and fauna. See appendix Similarly the Council Land Drainage Team have provided an assessment of sedimentation issues too. See appendix 5. Cost.

Item No.: 9 Page 32 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

Estimate $5,000-$8,000 (to be reconfirmed). Current funding exists to support this project and availability of contractors is being determined. 6. Maintenance.

Item 9 Ongoing maintenance could be carried out by the City Council Ranger Service or as

discussed with the Reserve Management Committee. Signage should be developed and installed.

7. Summary The opportunity exists to improve this track and utilise funding from the Regional Parks budget along with resources from contractors and rangers to minimise the impact on volunteer time. Opportunities for volunteers to work on the project could be enabled. The finished track could initially have a mineral earth surface.

Attachment B

Item No.: 9 Page 33 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

Item 9

Appendix

Urumau Reserve track upgrade – Consent requirement review

Based on the documentation you supplied and our discussion I understand the works you wish to undertake to be:

 The construction of a 120 metre long track  Earthworks of around 50 m3 to construct the track  SAP 20 gravel surfacing of the track to a depth of 100 mm

Having reviewed the Christchurch District Plan (the Plan) the following provisions apply: Attachment B

 The earthworks provisions of Chapter 8  Open Space Natural Zone  Remainder of Port Hills and Banks Peninsula Slope Instability Management Area  Liquefaction Management Area  Nga Turanga Tupuna Overlay

I note that while Urumau Reserve is also subject to Rockfall Management Area 2 notations, the track appears to be located outside of such areas. Should the earthworks have been within the Rockfall Management Area then a resource consent would have been required as a Restricted Discretionary Activity. The location of the track in relation to the hazard overlays can be seen in the image at Figure 1 below.

Item No.: 9 Page 34 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

Item 9

Attachment B

Figure 1: Natural Hazard overlays. Green = Slope Instability, Brown = Liquefaction, Purple = Rockfall

Turning now to the other provisions of the Plan, ordinarily a consent for earthworks would be required under Chapter 8, given that such works are not permitted on land steeper than 1 in 6, where the depth of works exceed 0.6 metres and maximum volumes exceed the stated maximums. I would expect that the gradient would be steeper than 1 in 6. In addition, any fill must comprise clean fill. These standards are set out under Rule 8.9.2.1, clause P1. However, the exemptions for earthworks under Rule 8.9.3, include at clause xii, “Earthworks undertaken by Council or Canterbury Regional Council to maintain or upgrade their own parks and reserves.” I am of the view that the works proposed fall under the exemption and as result are not subject to the standards under Rule 8.9.2.1, clause P1.

The zone provides for “Recreation Activities” as a permitted activity, which the track is. As discussed the natural hazard (i.e. slope instability and liquefaction) overlays raise no consenting matters, and nor does the Nga Turanga Tupuna overlay, since that only comes into play when a resource consent is required.

In conclusion I am of the view that the works are permitted.

On a final point, I checked the former Banks Peninsula District Plan maps to see whether any archaeological sites were present. No sites were in the area. Having said that, please take the usual precautions to ensure that earthworks are closely supervised in the event that should cultural

Item No.: 9 Page 35 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

materials be discovered that works stop immediately and that Pouhere Taonga (Heritage NZ) is contacted.

All the best, Item 9 Kent

Kent Wilson

Senior Planner Resource Consents Unit

DDI 03 941 5087

Web www.ccc.govt.nz

Christchurch City Council Civic Offices, 53 Hereford Street, Christchurch PO Box 73013, Christchurch, 8154

Attachment B Please consider the environment before printing this email

Urumau Reserve track upgrade – Drainage/sediment review Hi Nick,

Thanks for showing me the proposed track work.

I can’t foresee any drainage related issues being created by the creation of the tracks you have proposed.

The use of grade reversals that tie in with the natural lie of the surrounding land, and forming the track surfaces with ‘out slope’ should mean there will be little effect on the flows downhill and very little, if any, change from the existing.

Neither of the tracks proposed cross any major gullies with defined waterways however there are some minor gully formations which will naturally start to concentrate the water.

In the case of Urumau Reserve combining the track shaping measures mentioned above and the location of existing drainage along the edge of the traversing track at the lower boundary of the reserve there should be no effect to drainage below the reserve.

A couple of general points, probably nothing new to you though… Monitoring and maintenance of the tracks is recommended to address any rutting or channelling that may form in the track surface or along its edge as this could concentrate the surface flows over a large area of the track into one point of discharge which could in turn create issues downstream. I guess the grade reversals should largely keep this under control though.

Item No.: 9 Page 36 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

Also it is recommended to keep an eye out for any cracks or voids that may be uncovered during the formation of the tracks as these could signify either the presence of an existing tunnel gully or the start of a new tunnel gully.

Item 9 Tim Ayers

Area Supervisor Banks Peninsula Land Drainage Operations

DDI 03 941 6275 Mobile 027 273 0482 Email [email protected] Web ccc.govt.nz

Christchurch City Council Civic Offices, 53 Hereford Street PO Box 73014, Christchurch, 8154

Please consider the environment before printing this email

Attachment B

Urumau Reserve track upgrade – Environmental impact review

Nicholas Head 19/06/2019

Introduction

A rapid inspection of a proposed upgrade to a track through the Urumau Reserve in Lyttelton was undertaken on the 11/06/2018 to assess potential impacts on native flora and fauna. CCC staff present were Nick Singleton and Nicholas Head (author). Wendy Everingham, Brian Downing and Daryl Warnock attended form the Reserve committee. This report summarises the botanical values present, the effects of the track, and proposes ways to avoid, remedy and mitigate impacts.

Urumau Reserve occupies the lower spur of Mt Cavendish into Lyttelton Harbour. It forms the eastern boundary of Lyttelton Township and the Port Company land. It adjoins more extensive areas of reserve land to the north that comprises the Mt Cavendish walkway complex.

Ecological Context

Prior to human arrival, the Port Hills was considered to be been extensively covered in mixed podocarp and broadleaved hardwood forests1. Dry spurs and rocky areas supported dry scrub typified by prostrate kowhai, matagouri, porcupine shrubs, common broom, Coprosma species and

1 Wilson, H. D. 2013. Plant life on Banks Peninsula. Manuka Press, Cromwell, New Zealand.

Item No.: 9 Page 37 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

silver tussock. Much of the original forest and scrub cover was removed by Maori and subsequent European burning.

As a consequence of burning, silver tussock grasslands advantageously colonised extensive areas

cleared of forest. Subsequent pastoralism introduced various exotic grass and herb species. Today Item 9 most of the Port Hills comprises exotic grasses in mosaic with silver tussock that typically occur

together in varying proportions of cover depending on local site conditions. Native shrubs and trees are patchy generally, with the exception of considerable areas now planted as part of forest

restoration being undertaken by Council. Woody weeds (gorse, broom, tree-lucern, bone seed etc) cover considerable areas in places.

The Port Hills are classified as occurring in the Central Hill Country (F3)2 land environment (LENZ). Less than 10% of indigenous vegetation remains on the F3 LENZ nationally. As a result it is classified as acutely threatened3 for which the protection of remnant indigenous vegetation on threatened lenz is a national priority4.

Urumau Reserve botanical description

Exotic conifers that have been planted for rock stabilisation/protection are the dominant vegetation

forming largely closed canopy cover over most of the reserve. A variety of other randomly planted Attachment B (and wilding) exotic tree species are also present, including eucalypts, acacias, Tasmanian ngaio, karo to name a few. An area of predominately rank exotic grass, dominated by cocksfoot, occupies the lower west facing flank of the reserve within which ‘restoration’ planting of native forest species has been occurring.

Naturally occurring native species have colonised the conifer forest understory, mostly in light gaps, forming a sporadic and sparse sub-canopy layer of mostly mahoe. Lancewood, akeake, kohuhu, broadleaf copromsa spp and tree nettle are also occasionally present. A variety of native ferns are also common.

Botanical attributes of interest include the naturally regenerating hardwood forest in the conifer understory. Two native species of note were also present being the nationally rare Chenopodium allanii (At Risk - Naturally Uncommon5), as well as a large patch of the threatened grassy sedge (Carex inopinata) (Nationally vulnerable).

The reserve is very weedy. Old man’s beard, flowering current, ivy, bone seed, karo, spindleberry, boxthorn, Pseudopanax lessonii crosses, are all present and relatively common. The control of these species is highly desirable.

2 Leathwick, J. R.; Wilson, D.; Rutledge, D.; Wardle, P.; Morgan, F.; Johnston, K.; McLeod, M.; Kirkpatrick, R. 2003. Land Environments of New Zealand, Nga Taiao o Aotearoa. David Bateman Ltd, Auckland. 184 pp.

3 Walker, S.; Cieraad, E.; Barringer, J. 2015. The Threatened Environment Classification for New Zealand 2012: a guide for users. Landcare Research, 27 p. Landcare Research New Zealand ltd, Dunedin.

4 Protecting our places: Introducing the national priorities for protecting rare and threatened biodiversity on private land. Available at https://www.biodiversity.govt.nz/land/guidance/.

5 De Lange, P. J.; Rolfe, J. R.; Barkla, J. W.; Courtney, S. P,; Champion, P. D.; Perrie, L. R.; Beadel, S. M.; Ford, K. A.; Breitwiesser, I.; Schonberger, I.; Hindmarsh-Walls, R.; Heenan, P. B.; Ladley, K. 2017. Conservation of New Zealand indigenous vascular plants, 2017. New Zealand Department of Conservation.

Item No.: 9 Page 38 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

Common forest birds were present, such as grey warblers, fantails, silvereyes, and bell birds. No evidence was seen of lizards being present.

The track upgrade - effects and mitigation

Item 9 The section of track proposed for upgrade traverses primarily the west facing flank immediately above the residential houses of Lyttelton. It is approximately 50m long of relatively gentle slope <10degrees. It traverses through almost entirely exotic grassland. Occasional native shrubs and trees that have been planted occur sporadically either side of the track, including nagio, kanuka,

manuka6, akeake, among others.

The vast majority of the track upgrade will affect exotic grasses and will have negligible impacts on botanical values or indigenous biodiversity per se. Whether the track upgrade affects areas of planted native trees is also of little concern as these plantings are not significant7 in terms of Sec 6c of the Resource Management Act (RMA). Moreover, because they are planted means any unavoidable loss can be replaced if need be.

Whether the track upgrade and use will exacerbate soil erosion in my view is unlikely. Although tunnel gully erosion is a known problem in loess soils on the Port Hills, there appeared little evidence

of any heightened susceptibility to tunnel gully erosion from the existing track. Planting the adjoining Attachment B slopes to the track could potentially alleviate the risk of this occurring. Track monitoring and timely responses to any concerning erosion that may be occurring should alleviate this concern.

It is possible that ground disturbance may facilitate weed colonisation along the track margins. Monitoring and weed control should be undertaken to address this possible adverse effect from the track upgrade.

Summary and recommendations

The proposed track upgrade through the Urumau Reserve traverses predominately exotic grassland and possibly small areas that have been planted in native trees. Neither the grassland areas nor the planted areas are significant ecologically, although planting has the potential to contribute ecological gains overtime.

The effects of the track upgrade primarily involve the removal of mostly exotic vegetation and potential soil erosion.

These effects are considered to be minor and they can be avoided or remedied through:

 Avoiding any naturally occurring native trees shrubs or rare and threatened plants present  Monitoring track soil erosion and undertake remedial action if necessary  Undertake weed monitoring and control if necessary

References cited

Leathwick, J. R.; Wilson, D.; Rutledge, D.; Wardle, P.; Morgan, F.; Johnston, K.; McLeod, M.; Kirkpatrick, R. 2003. Land Environments of New Zealand, Nga Taiao o Aotearoa. David Bateman Ltd, Auckland. 184 pp.

6 Manuka and possibly other planted species are not locally sourced nor are they appropriate for ‘restoration’ planting in the reserve.

7 Planed natives can be significant if for example they are a contiguous part of a larger natural remnant or they provide important habitats for native fauna.

Item No.: 9 Page 39 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

McEwen, W. M. (editor) 1987. Ecological regions and districts of New Zealand, third revised edition (Sheet s). New Zealand Biological Resources Centre Publication No 5. Department of Conservation, Wellington.

Protecting our places: Introducing the national priorities for protecting rare and threatened biodiversity on

private land. Available at https://www.biodiversity.govt.nz/land/guidance/. Item 9

Walker, S.; Cieraad, E.; Barringer, J. 2015. The Threatened Environment Classification for New Zealand 2012: a

guide for users. Landcare Research, 27 p. Landcare Research New Zealand ltd, Dunedin.

Williams, P. A.; Wiser, S.; Clarkson, B.; Stanley, M.C. 2007. New Zealand’s historically rare terrestrial ecosystems set in a physical and physiognomic framework. New Zealand Journal of Ecology, 31(2): 119–128.

Wilson, H. D. 2013. Plant life on Banks Peninsula. Manuka Press, Cromwell, New Zealand.

Attachment B

Item No.: 9 Page 40 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

Item 9

To The Banks Peninsula Community Board 17th of June 2021

Dear Community Board Members,

Re Diagonal Track Proposals Urumau Reserve

Here is my summary of the Reserve Management Committee’s position on why we do not support the Diagonal Track proposal at this moment in time.

The Community Board, when it approved the 2018 Urumau Development Plan, also approved a large number of mountain bike tracks in the Reserve and stipulated that no more tracks were to be built without approval. Attachment C In 2019, the outgoing Lyttelton Reserve Management Committee laid out the time lines and the priorities for the implementation of the Development Plan.

In 2020 the incoming Committee formally accepted that outline and identified the priorities.

Three existing tracks were identified as being in urgent need of major maintenance and requiring considerable upgrade to be fit for purpose as shared-use tracks.

They are, in order of priority:-  The Foster Tce. entrance to the Drainage Bench Track (Zig-zag Track).  The Stan Helms Track entrance through the Waharoa in Whaka Raupō Reserve  The Urumau Loop Track.

A series of surveys have been carried out at the Foster Tce. entrance to determine the numbers and users of the Zig-zag Track. Mostly they are walkers – typically 60 per day whereas mountain bikers are typically 5 per day. The signage states that mountain bikers should give way to walkers. In reality this is an impossible situation. The track is too narrow. Walkers must get completely off the track to allow the mountain biker through before either party can proceed. We have also carried out levelling with surveying equipment on this track and have found it has poor alignment and in parts have a steeper gradient than recommended. Poor drainage is causing major scouring of the track surface. Consequently it is deteriorating rapidly. In parts the gravels have been carried away exposing the bare soil below. The Committee’s track team is currently carrying out extensive work to rebuild this important track to a better standard.

Item No.: 9 Page 41 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

Our Track Team has briefly looked at the Ranger's proposal for the Diagonal Track. It has also noted the Lyttelton Mountain Bike Club’s different proposal that it presented in its petition to the Board and has found serious problems with both proposals. The Committee wants to work on the design and construction of the Diagonal Track at a later stage and thereby avoid the considerable problems experienced on the Zig-zag Track. Item 9

Some key points for the Committee will be:

 The track to be designed with a focus on walkers as they are the greatest user of the reserves.  Shared-use track standards need to apply and the track should be a minimum of 1.5 metres wide as specified in the Development Plan.  The track needs proper surveying to get the best gradients for walkers .  The Committee wants to supervise the construction of the track after it has decided on a satisfactory design and after completion of the Zig-zag Track rebuild.  Further ecological advice is required. We believe we have a potentially significant habitat of Cantuaria dendyi - trapdoor spider that is endemic to Banks Peninsula in this area. Attachment C We will let the Board know when we are ready to provide more detailed consideration on this track. In the meantime, our Committee does not support the development of this new track until the priorities outlined above have been addressed.

Kind Regards,

BrIan Downey. Chairperson Lyttelton Reserves Management Committee

PO Box 79, Lyttelton 8841 Email: [email protected] LYTTELTON RESERVES MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE is a community elected sub- committee of the Banks Peninsula Community Board, Christchurch City Council.

Item No.: 9 Page 42 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

10. Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū/Banks Peninsula Community Board Area Report - July 2021

Reference / Te Tohutoro: 21/128632 Report of / Te Pou Penelope Goldstone, CGM Banks Peninsula, Matua: [email protected] General Manager / Mary Richardson, GM Citizens & Community,

Item 10

Pouwhakarae: [email protected]

1. Purpose of Report / Te Pūtake Pūrongo This report provides the Board with an overview on initiatives and issues current within the Community Board area.

2. Officer Recommendations / Ngā Tūtohu That the Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board: 1. Receive the Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board Area Report for July 2021.

3. Community Support, Governance and Partnership Activity 3.1 Community Governance Projects Activity Detail Timeline Strategic Alignment Community Pam Richardson met with Council staff Ongoing Our communities are response to 10th June, 2021. Discussion included a prepared for the natural hazards need to raise public awareness around impacts of natural personal preparedness for disasters, hazards and can identify existing response groups respond and/or champions, assess the level of support they need/desire from the Council, and provide more tsunami evacuation education.

Norman Kirk The Lyttelton Pool has a number of Ongoing Our communities are Pool -Lyttelton options for the community to access. strong, connected These options included for 2020/21: and foster a sense of belonging  Casual entry from 14th November through till the end of January from 12pm-7pm.

Item No.: 10 Page 43 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

 A Season Pass Key-holder, offering access Monday – Sunday from 7am, 8pm from the 14th November

through till March 28th ($160 per household).  An End of Season Membership, valid from 1st February through till 28th March ($80 per household).

Item 10

 Project Lyttelton and the Christchurch City Council’s Recreation and Sports Unit partnered to offer eight season pool keys from November 14th through till March 28th (Project Lyttelton raised funds as part of their garage sales to offer four pool keys and the Recreation and Sports Unit matched this offer). Some significant headway has been made and further options for casual users from 31st January till the end of March continues. For this coming season the key membership options will remain in place, as well as:  Lifeguards will be on-site from 13th November to the 7th February 2022 (an extra week).  Casual entry is available to the community outside of Lifeguarded hours when accompanied by a key member.  The suitability of Pay2Play; a cloud based facilities booking keyless access system (adopted by The Lyttelton Recreation Centre) is being explored. The Recreation and Sports Unit have indicated that they would need to investigate the feasibility of this before any funding could be allocated.  Providing eight families with a donated key will again be explored for this coming season.

Item No.: 10 Page 44 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

3.2 Community Funding Summary 3.2.1 Discretionary Response Funding: All but $5,350 of the Community Board’s 2020-21 Discretionary Response Funding has been granted across Banks Peninsula over the last 12 months to support worthwhile projects. A report is attached showing details – Attachment A 3.2.2 Strengthening Communities Fund (SCF) – All applications to the 2021-22 SCF funding round for projects starting 1 September this year were submitted online by 12 April and

Item 10

have since been processed. Allocations are scheduled to be made by the Board at its meeting on 23 August. At that time, the remainder of the 2021/22 community funding budget will be transferred to the Board's 2021/22 Discretionary Response Fund for allocation throughout the 2021/22 financial year (1 July 2021-30 June 2022). 3.3 Participation in and Contribution to Decision Making 3.3.1 Report back on other Activities contributing to Community Board Plan [for items not included in the above table but are included in Community Board Plan]  Nothing to report. 3.3.2 Council Engagement and Consultation.  Proposed Plan Change 8 Papakāinga/Kāinga Nohoanga Zone – the Community Board submission to Proposed Plan Change 8 Papakāinga/Kāinga Nohoanga Zone, which supported changes in building setbacks, earthworks, and site coverage to allow the innovative papakāinga collectively-owned housing model to succeed, was submitted to Council on 13 May 2021 – Attachment B  Proposed Replacement Freedom Camping Bylaw 2021 – the Community Board submission to the Proposed Replacement Freedom Camping Bylaw 2021, which incorporated feedback from its Reserve Management Committees, was submitted to Council on 21 June 2021 – Attachment C  Current Consultations Topic Closing Link Date Representation Review 25 July 2021 https://ccc.govt.nz/the- Final Appeals and council/consultations-and- Objections submissions/haveyoursay/show/424 Waka Kotahi 27 July 2021 https://www.nzta.govt.nz/media- Christchurch to Akaroa releases/making-the-road-to-akaroa- Speed Review safer-for-everyone-starting-with- speed/

 The Board, if it wishes, could lodge an appeal or an objection to the Council’s Representation Review which the Council must forward to the Local Government Commission for their consideration. An Objection may be lodged by any person or organisation on issues where the Council’s final proposal differs from the initial proposal. The objection must clearly identify the matters which the objection relates to.

Item No.: 10 Page 45 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

3.3.3 Graffiti Insight – The Community Support Unit provided a Banks Peninsula Graffiti Insight for May 2021 - Attachment D and June 2021 – Attachment E. 3.3.4 Letters from the Banks Peninsula Community Board

 Letter of support for funding for Akaroa Heritage Festival Society and Akaroa Community Arts Council to produce the Akaroa French Festival – Attachment F  Letter of support for funding for the Governors Bay Jetty Restoration Trust to relocate the historic Yacht Club House – Attachment G

Item 10

 Letter of support for funding the British Hotel to restore its roof and parapet – Attachment H 3.3.5 Letters from the Banks Peninsula Community Board  The Board received a letter of thanks from Friends of Te Ra Community Park Inc. regarding the leasehold contract in respect of the land at 38 Waipapa Avenue, Diamond Harbour – Attachment I

4. Advice Provided to the Community Board 4.1 Banks Peninsula Customer Service Requests Report – 22 May to 20 June 2021. For more information, please see Attachment J

4.2 Banks Peninsula Water Management Zone Committee – Minutes of the meeting held on Tuesday 18th May are attached - Attachment K Adding Pages Road Extension to Asset Register – at its meeting on 19 October 2020, the Board requested a report from staff detailing the process to add the use the unsealed portion of Pages Road in Lyttelton to the Council’s Asset Register, the work and any costs involved to do so and any other information required to enable the Board to make a decision. This report is attached – Attachment L

Item No.: 10 Page 46 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

Attachments / Ngā Tāpirihanga

No. Title Page

A ⇩ Banks Peninsula Discretionary Response Fund End of Year 2020-21.pdf 48 B ⇩ Proposed Plan Change 8 Papakāinga/Kāinga Nohoanga Zone Submission 49

C ⇩ Proposed Replacement Freedom Camping Bylaw 2021 Submission 50

Item 10

D ⇩ Banks Peninsula Graffiti Snapshot - May 2021 51

E ⇩ Banks Peninsula Graffiti Snapshot - June 2021 53 F ⇩ Letter of Support the Akaroa French Festival 55 G ⇩ Letter of Support for Governors Bay Jetty Restoration Trust 56

H ⇩ Letter of Support for the British Hotel 57

I ⇩ Letter from Friends of Te Ra Community Park Inc. - Leasehold with CCC 58 J ⇩ Banks Peninsula Customer Service Request Report June 2021.pdf 60 K ⇩ Banks Peninsula Water Management Zone Committee Minutes - 18 May 2021 61

L ⇩ External Memo - Adding Pages Road Extension To Asset Register 67

Signatories / Ngā Kaiwaitohu Authors Robin Arnold - Community Development Advisor Linda Burkes - Support Officer Liz Carter - Community Board Advisor Jane Harrison - Community Development Advisor Philipa Hay - Community Development Advisor Adrianna Hess - Hearings and Council Support Officer Andrea Wild - Community Development Advisor Approved By Penelope Goldstone - Manager Community Governance, Banks Peninsula Matthew Pratt - Manager Community Governance, Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton John Filsell - Head of Community Support, Governance and Partnerships

Item No.: 10 Page 47 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

Board Banks Peninsula Discretionary Response Fund 2020/21 Approval BUDGET $9,131.00 Shape Your Place Toolkit (Ring-fenced within DRF) $7,000.00 Transfer of unallocated 2020/21 Strengthening Communities funds to the 2020/21 Discretionary Response Fund $22,155.00 17/08/2020 Council decision for Covid 19 Funding $20,000.00 27/08/2020 Returned Grants $1,716.00 Item 10 Total BUDGET $60,002.00

ALLOCATIONS MADE: Discretionary Response Fund

Board Project: Summer with your Neighbours $3,000.00 22/06/2020 Banks Peninsula Community Board - Community Service Awards 2021 $2,995.00 22/06/2020 Public Access Defibrillator - Te Hapu o Ngati Wheke $3,616.00 17/08/2020 Banks Peninsula Community Board - Elected Member Hui Assistance $657.00 19/10/2020 Te Puna Auaha Lyttelton Trust - Mural $4,000.00 7/12/2020 Diamond Harbour Events Inc. - Live at the Point $2,000.00 1/02/2021 Comte de Paris Descendants Group Inc. - 180 Year Anniversary Weekend $2,815.00 1/02/2021 ANZAC Day 2021 $2,000.00 12/04/2021 Pigeon Bay Settlers Hall Centennial $2,000.00 12/04/2021 The Lyttelton Recreation Centre Trust - Security Cameras $2,200.00 14/06/2021 The Friends of Te Ra Community Park Inc - Recreational Assets $2,000.00 14/06/2021 Little River Railway Station Trust - Gangers Hut $1,408.00 14/06/2021 Diamond Harbour Playcentre - Creation of a Nature Discovery Area $3,500.00 14/06/2021 Attachment A Little River Farmers Market - Little River Farmers Market Establishment Costs $3,000.00 14/06/2021 Frankie Bakker - Little River Tennis Courts Mural $2,000.00 14/06/2021 St Joseph The Worker Memorial Charitable Trust - Memorial Project Stage 1 $5,000.00 28/06/2021 Naval Point Club Lyttelton - Volunteer Equipment - radios and GPS $1,954.00 28/06/2021 Banks Peninsula Netball Club - Akaroa Recreation Ground Tennis Court Upgrade $2,907.00 28/06/2021 Discretionary Response Fund Allocated $47,052.00

Youth Development Fund Tier 1 National Water Polo Championships - Agatha Weston $150.00 10/09/2020 Tier 1 National Water Polo Championships - Eve Weston $150.00 10/09/2020 NZIODA 2020 Toyota Optimist National Sailing Championships - Benjamin Catton $150.00 10/09/2020 Trampolining Nationals - Atalia Crocker $150.00 18/03/2021

Youth Development Fund Allocated $600.00

Shape Your Place Toolkit $ 7,000.00 Little River Railway Station Front Entrance Doors $ 2,875.00 2/11/2020

Little River Railway Station Trust - Postal Room Door Alteration Design & Consent Fees $ 2,490.00 14/06/2021 Banks Peninsula Netball Club - Akaroa Recreation Ground Tennis Court Upgrade $ 1,635.00 28/06/2021 Shape Your Place Toolkit Allocated $ 7,000.00

TOTAL: Shape Your Place Toolkit Unallocated $ -

TOTAL: Discretionary Response Fund Unallocated $5,350.00

Pending Board Approval

Pending Board Approval Balance $0

TOTAL: Discretionary Response Fund Remaining if Pending approved $5,350.00

Item No.: 10 Page 48 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

SUBMISSION TO: Christchurch City Council

ON: Proposed Plan Change 8 Papakāinga/Kāinga Nohoanga Zone

BY: Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū/Banks Peninsula Community Board

Item 10 ADDRESS: Lyttelton Service Centre PO Box 73027

CHRISTCHURCH 8154

Email: [email protected]

DATE: 13 May 2021

1. INTRODUCTION

The Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū/Banks Peninsula Community Board (the “Board”) appreciates the opportunity to provide a submission on Proposed Plan Change 8 Papakāinga/Kāinga Nohoanga Zone. There are six Papatipu Rūnanga within the Banks Peninsula Ward, and the Board welcomes the opportunity to advocate for the four hapū that have Papakāinga zones within its area. The Board sees this as part of its journey to understand and support the unique cultural values of local Rūnanga. Attachment B

2. SUBMISSION

By way of an opening statement, the Board supports Proposed Plan Change 8, which will enable an approach for Māori to successfully complete papakāinga housing developments.

The Board understands that the rules governing internal boundary setback for buildings intend to create harmonious neighbourhoods within communities. However, the current setbacks required by the Christchurch District Plan Chapter 4 Papakāinga/Kāinga Nohoanga Zone are inappropriate, and they prevent the utilisation of narrow sections for communal buildings within this zone. Therefore, the Board supports the internal boundary setback reduction, as well as the proposed recession plane to offset the possible visual and privacy effects on neighbours.

The Board also supports increasing the maximum permitted site coverage of buildings on Māori land to allow for the possibility of multiple buildings on communally owned land, as well as the more generous earthworks allowance, but to no greater equivalent than any other residential zones. The Board believes that the changes proposed in Plan Change 8 allows the innovative papakāinga collectively-owned housing model to succeed, so that Māori of all ages who are connected by kaupapa can achieve their housing aspirations.

Yours sincerely,

Tori Peden Chairperson Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū/Banks Peninsula Community Board

Item No.: 10 Page 49 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

SUBMISSION TO: Christchurch City Council

ON: Proposed Replacement Freedom Camping Bylaw 2021

BY: Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū/Banks Peninsula Community Board

ADDRESS: Lyttelton Service Centre Item 10 PO Box 73027 CHRISTCHURCH 8154

Email: [email protected]

DATE: 21 June 2021

1. INTRODUCTION

The Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū/Banks Peninsula Community Board (the “Board”) appreciates the opportunity to provide a submission on the Proposed Replacement Freedom Camping Bylaw 2021.

2. SUBMISSION

In general, the Board agrees with the proposed changes to the Freedom Camping Bylaw. The Board Attachment C especially agrees with the proposal to change how the Council manages freedom camping at Te Nukutai o Tapoa Naval Point marine and recreational area in Lyttelton, by limiting the location and number of parks where freedom camping can occur at this site. The Board also supports the blanket ban on non-self-contained vehicles freedom camping in our existing bylaw, along with the need to review the self-containment regime to ensure it is delivering expected outcomes. It has come to the attention of the Board that there have been occurrences where freedom campers have illegally used the facilities at Pigeon Bay Camping Ground adjacent to the freedom camping area in Pigeon Bay. It is for this reason that the Board supports an addition to Schedule 1: Freedom Camping Prohibited Areas, to include the Pigeon Bay foreshore. The Board understands the need to balance freedom camping opportunities with necessary limitations in order to preserve the ecological health of Banks Peninsula, and to ensure that future generations will have the opportunity to enjoy these areas for years to come.

Yours sincerely,

Tori Peden Chairperson Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū/Banks Peninsula Community Board

Item No.: 10 Page 50 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

GRAFFITI SNAPSHOT May 2021

Ward & Suburb Insights

10231m2 1734 (Council & Public Item 10 Total Reports Property)

Ward Reporting Ward Removal This is an indication (compared to the previous month) This is an indication (compared to the previous month) of how active our citizens are. Several people may of how much graffiti has been removed. This gives a report the same “tag” so this is not the best way to better indication of the amount of graffiti present. determine the amount of graffiti present.

Attachment D

Reporting Hot Spots Removal Hot Spots Streets/Locations with the most reported graffiti Streets/Locations with the most graffiti removed (m2)

Item No.: 10 Page 51 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

GRAFFITI SNAPSHOT May 2021

Further Insights

Volunteer Activity Most reported TAG

Reports made by GP Volunteers Locations and details of these TAGS are Item 10 forward to the Police each month. 35%

631 Reports 22 Active Volunteers

REPORTEDTop Reporter BY VOLUNTEERS 387 Peter Reports by Asset Type

Attachment D

1,200 1,044 1,000 800 600 457 400 97 71 200 61 22 16 6 2 0 Graffiti Graffiti Graffiti Graffiti Graffiti Graffiti Graffiti Graffiti Graffiti Contract on Utility on on Other on Park on Pump on Street box Private Street Walkway Station Heritage Art Property Signs Signs Building New Murals

Chorus Cabinet Art Ferry Road Nick Lowry

From the Police

Station Proceedings Age Outcome Christchurch Central Police Station 1 17+ Formal Warning

Item No.: 10 Page 52 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

GRAFFITI SNAPSHOT June 2021

Ward & Suburb Insights

6857m2

1645 (Council & Public Item 10 Total Reports Property)

Ward Reporting Ward Removal This is an indication (compared to the previous month) This is an indication (compared to the previous month) of how active our citizens are. Several people may of how much graffiti has been removed. This gives a report the same “tag” so this is not the best way to better indication of the amount of graffiti present. determine the amount of graffiti present.

Attachment E

Reporting Hot Spots Removal Hot Spots Streets/Locations with the most reported graffiti Streets/Locations with the most graffiti removed (m2)

Item No.: 10 Page 53 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

GRAFFITI SNAPSHOT June 2021

Further Insights

Volunteer Activity Most reported TAG

Reports made by GP Volunteers Locations and details of these TAGS are Item 10 forward to the Police each month. 50%

831 Reports 26 Active Volunteers

REPORTEDTop Reporter BY VOLUNTEERS 534 Peter Reports by Asset Type

Attachment E

910

494

108 64 52 18 11 7 1

New Murals

Little River School Frankie Bakker

Item No.: 10 Page 54 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

1 June 2021

Item 10

To Whom It May Concern:

LETTER OF SUPPORT – AKAROA FRENCH FESTIVAL

The Banks Peninsula Community Board enthusiastically supports funding for the Akaroa Heritage Festival Society and the Akaroa Community Arts Council. Both groups work in partnership to produce the annual Akaroa French Festival. This festival brings our community together to celebrate its heritage and to take pride in the diverse and interesting history of the people of Akaroa Harbour.

Every year, between five and eight thousand visitors travel to the Akaroa French Festival where they provide important revenue for local businesses as they participate in free music, Attachment F dancing, and a three-day French Market. Central to this festival is the historic re-enactment “Landings”, where over 150 community members, many of whom represent their own ancestors, reproduce the French arrival on the beach of Akaroa. The French Festival also provides the opportunity to learn about Banks Peninsula’s endemic wildlife and natural geology from local conservationists and geologists.

The Board is delighted to support this application. We believe that the celebration of our cultural and environmental heritage will continue to provide appreciable benefits to locals and visitors to Akaroa and The Bays. If you have any questions about this letter, please do not hesitate to get in touch.

Yours faithfully,

Tori Peden

Chairperson Banks Peninsula Community Board PO Box 73028 Christchurch 8154

Lyttelton Service Centre 25 Winchester Street, Lyttelton PO Box 73029, Christchurch Phone: 03 941 6633 Email: [email protected]

Item No.: 10 Page 55 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

30 June 2021

Item 10

To Whom It May Concern:

LETTER OF SUPPORT – GOVERNORS BAY JETTY RESTORATION TRUST

The Banks Peninsula Community Board cordially supports the Governors Bay Jetty Restoration Trust’s application to the Christchurch City Council’s Heritage Incentive Grant Fund to move the historic Yacht Club House to a permanent site near the long jetty in Governors Bay. The Board has supported the Club House in the past, by providing funding to strengthen its floor for moving, and indeed the Board still supports the idea of saving this tangible piece of local nautical history.

If you have any questions about this letter please do not hesitate to get in touch.

Attachment G

Yours faithfully,

Tori Peden

Chairperson Banks Peninsula Community Board PO Box 73028 Christchurch 8154

Lyttelton Service Centre, 25 Winchester Street, Lyttelton P.O. Box 73029, Christchurch

Item No.: 10 Page 56 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

24 June 2021

Item 10

To Whom It May Concern:

LETTER OF SUPPORT – THE BRITISH HOTEL

The Banks Peninsula Community Board strongly supports the British Hotel’s application to the Christchurch City Council’s Heritage Grant Fund. The objective of this fund supports owners, kaitiaki, communities, and groups to protect, promote and celebrate the unique stories and places which are our taonga, and this application certainly achieves those intentions.

Built in the 1940s, the British Hotel is one of Christchurch’s few remaining buildings of the Moderne Style, characterized by the eclectic coexistence of traditionalism and modernism with

Attachment H curved, ship-like forms and styling. At the time of the earthquakes, there were seven traditional hotel buildings in Lyttelton. There are now just two traditional hotel buildings remaining, the British and the Mitre, but only the British Hotel remains open and trading. Therefore, the Board believes that supporting the British Hotel to restore its roof and parapet is a worthwhile endeavour in our efforts to protect this unique place in Lyttelton Harbour.

If you have any questions about this letter please do not hesitate to get in touch.

Yours faithfully,

Tori Peden

Chairperson Banks Peninsula Community Board PO Box 73028 Christchurch 8154

Lyttelton Service Centre, 25 Winchester Street, Lyttelton P.O. Box 73029, Christchurch

Item No.: 10 Page 57 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

10

Item

Attachment I

Item No.: 10 Page 58 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

10

Item

Attachment I

Item No.: 10 Page 59 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

Ticket Report Banks Peninsula 22 May 2021 - 20 Jun 2021

Average days to complete ticket Channels

167 10 66 (16%) Open Tickets 15

5 Item 10 77 (19%) 328 20

Completed Tickets 263 (65%)

0

3.5 Phone/Email/Walk-in Hybris Online (HCEA) Snap, Send, Solve

Tickets by Incident Category

147

Attachment J

76

46 41

29 29

13 12 12

1

Transport 3 Waters Property Wheelie Bins Animal Parks Graffiti 3 Waters Council Facility Other Council Assets Information Management Private Management Property

Top 10 Issues # Tickets Object Category  46 Road Asset (e.g.footpath,road,furniture) 42 Residential Property Files 32 Leak (Water Supply) 23 Damaged Bin 19 Tree (Road) 17 Blocked drain pipe or waterway (Road) 11 Council Water Supply Issues 11 Graffiti 10 Bin Not Collected Report date: 21/06/2021 10 Drainage Plan /

Item No.: 10 Page 60 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

Item 10

Banks Peninsula Water Management Zone Committee

OPEN MINUTES

Date: Tuesday 18 May 2021 Time: 4.04pm Venue: Lyttelton/Mt Herbert Boardroom, 25 Canterbury Street, Lyttelton

Present Attachment K Chairperson Gina Waibl - Community Representative Deputy Chairperson Aurora Smith - Te Hapū o Ngāti Wheke/Rapaki Members Rima Herber - Community Representative Elizabeth Macpherson - Community Representative Paula Smith - Community Representative Garrick Thorn - Community Representative Lan Pham - Councillor Environment Canterbury Rik Tainui - Te Rūnanga o Ōnuku

13 May 2021

Zone Facilitator Committee Advisor Principal Advisor Shelley Washington Liz Ryley Marion Schoenfeld Tel: 027 294 5219 Tel: 941 8153 Senior Surface Water Planner Environment Canterbury Christchurch City Council Tel: 941 5079 Christchurch City Council

To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit: www.ccc.govt.nz/the-council/meetings-agendas-and-minutes/ www.ecan.govt.nz/news-and-notices/minutes/Pages/Default.aspx

Item No.: 10 Page 61 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

Banks Peninsula Water Management Zone

Committee

18 May 2021

The meeting was opened with a Karakia/Timatanga.

The agenda was dealt with in the following order. Item 10

1. Apologies Committee Resolved BPZC/2021/00009

That the apologies received from Deputy Mayor Andrew Turner, Erana Riddell and Ben Manson, be accepted. Gina Waibl/Garrick Thorn Carried

2. Register of Interests The Register of Interests list will be updated with changes requested by Rima Herber and Paula

Smith. Attachment K

6. Deputations by Appointment Pam Richardson, Banks Peninsula sheep and beef hill country farmer, gave a deputation on three matters. One of her concerns, from an excerpt in committee notes, was about a perception of land use change to native forestry on the Peninsula. The Committee noted its intention is to raise awareness that currently for some landowners who may wish to pursue native afforestation vis ETS, that policy instruments and market incentives are not currently favourable, and to advocate for change so to improve the opportunities available to landowners. The matter had arisen from a recent presentation by Zone member Ben Manson at a workshop about his experience with looking into how to implement and afford mahinga kai and biodiversity actions on his property.

The Committee discussed the support they would provide to Ben when he gives this presentation to the ECan Council.

Pam raised a matter relating to the CCC Comprehensive Stormwater Network Discharge Consent and CCC Targeted Land Drainage Rate proposed in the 2021-2031 Long Term Plan. Marion Schoenfeld agreed to find out more information about the CCC Targeted Land Drainage Rate.

The third matter Pam raised related to the impacts of climate change on Pigeon Bay rock walls and seawalls. Jane Morgan and Robbert Lenselink from CCC identified that these are the types of issues they are exploring through the coastal hazard adaptation planning programme.

7. Identification of Urgent Items Nil.

8. Identification of General Public Contributions John Benn referred to an issue that has been reported to ECan and DOC about cows in water near the head of Te Roto o Wairewa/Lake Forsyth. Staff will provide information about the matter to the Zone Committee.

Page 2

Item No.: 10 Page 62 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

Banks Peninsula Water Management Zone

Committee

18 May 2021

9. Comprehensive Stormwater Network Discharge Consent

Clive Appleton, CCC Consent Implementation Lead, provided the Committee with information Item 10 about the Comprehensive Stormwater Network Discharge Consent (CSNDC) in terms of how it will work on Banks Peninsula and what areas it covers.

Jenny Watters, ECan Principal Implementation Advisor attended to provide the Environment Canterbury perspective on the consent. Jenny was co-ordinating ECan processes of how ECan responds to and monitors CCC’s compliance with the CSNDC.

Discussion was held about the issue of payment of the Land Drainage Rate in relation to Banks Peninsula and where it is paid for. Areas noted within the CSNDC were roads through settlements, some industrial sites, areas for yacht storage and cleaning area at the Naval Point area. Slipways are not part of the consent. Council is currently assessing the performance of stormwater treatment facilities such as basins within the city, and the learning from investigations of these will be applied across the Peninsula. The City Council is responsible for surfacewater runoff on the city side of the Port Hills. Further information about the targeted rate and who pays it would assist the

Committee understand this. Attachment K

An issue about consultation with Papatipu Rūnanga on the CSNDC was raised by Zone member Aurora Smith. Clive advised that consultation was carried out through the environmental management advisory company, Mahaanui Kurataiao Limited. There are seven Stormwater Management Plans in total and technical information is currently being sought on the Coastal and Estuary Stormwater Management Plan. Aurora suggested that the Zone Committee does not sign the Charter until Ngāti Wheke have advised the Committee that they feel adequately consulted by CCC on the CSNDC and Community Waterways Partnership. There is a need to ensure that consultation documents are distributed early to all parties.

Committee Resolved BPZC/2021/00010

That the Banks Peninsula Water Management Zone Committee: 1. Receive the information on Christchurch City Council’s Comprehensive Stormwater Network Discharge Consent. 2. Request staff provide a timeline for the development of the Banks Peninsula Stormwater Management Plan, including information on plans for proposed community engagement. Paula Smith/Rima Herber Carried

Page 3

Item No.: 10 Page 63 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

Banks Peninsula Water Management Zone

Committee

18 May 2021

10. Community Water Partnership

Sally Airey, Community Waterways Advisor, Christchurch City Council, updated the Committee on Item 10 the Community Waterways Partnership (the Partnership), a resource intended to raise community awareness of the impacts of stormwater on the health of urban waterways, the estuarine and

marine receiving environments, and associated ecosystems.

The Banks Peninsula Zone Committee was invited to the launch of the Partnership on 22 March 2021. At this launch, over forty community groups, schools, businesses, and organisations/agencies signed the Charter including the Christchurch West Melton Zone Committee, Christchurch City Council and Environment Canterbury. Since then, there has been further signatories. The Partnership had been endorsed in a letter received from the Director of Water & Land Policy, Ministry for the Environment. Discussion was held by the Committee about a suggestion to remove the word “urban” from the Partnership document so this would include rural areas. The Committee referred to their earlier discussion about requiring early engagement and input by Papatipu Rūnanga. Attachment K

Shelley provided an overview of the Stormwater Superhero Mobile Resource which is a resource that community groups, schools and organisations/agencies will be able to utilise to educate communities about stormwater.

Committee Resolved BPZC/2021/00011

That the Banks Peninsula Water Management Zone Committee: 1. Receive the information in the Community Water Partnership report. 2. Agree in principle to support the Community Water Partnership Charter, once the Zone Committee has received assurance that Papatipu Rūnanga are satisfied that adequate engagement on the Charter has occurred. Aurora Smith/Lan Pham Carried

11. Coastal Hazards Adaptation Planning

Jane Morgan, CCC Programme Lead for the Coastal Hazards Adaptation Planning programme, and Robbert Lenselink, CCC Surface Water Engineer, provided the Committee with an update about the Council’s Coastal Hazards Adaptation Planning programme. For more information, visit: https://ccc.govt.nz/environment/coast/adapting-to-sea-level- rises/our-coastal-hazards-adaptation-planning-programme

Committee Resolved BPZC/2021/00012

That the Banks Peninsula Water Management Zone Committee: 1. Receive the information on the Christchurch City Council’s Coastal Hazards Adaptation Planning programme.

Page 4

Item No.: 10 Page 64 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

Banks Peninsula Water Management Zone

Committee

18 May 2021

Paula Smith/Rik Tainui Carried

12. Facilitator's Update - 18 May 2021 Item 10

Shelley Washington’s Facilitator’s Update Report was taken as read.

Committee Resolved BPZC/2021/00013

That the Banks Peninsula Water Management Zone Committee: 1. Receive the information in the Facilitator’s update report.

Gina Waibl/Garrick Thorn Carried

Cr Pham departed 6.50pm.

3. Updates from Banks Peninsula Zone Committee Members

Members highlighted events/meetings/issues relevant to the Zone Committee, briefly outlined as: Attachment K

Paula Smith – Provided some feedback from the meeting she attended on 5 May regarding harvesting of trees. Under the District Plan Landscape rules, consent may be required and the City Council is investigating the matter. Aurora also attended the meeting and referred to a presentation given and the compliance matters discussed. Natives and redwood trees are being considered for planting, along with monitoring of sediment before and after harvest.

Motion Committee Resolved BPZC/2021/00014

That the Banks Peninsula Water Management Zone Committee: Request CCC to provide the Zone Committee with information about management of the unformed legal road around the foreshore of Moepuku Peninsula to minimise erosion and sedimentation of the harbour. Paula Smith/Rima Herber Carried

Garrick Thorn – Attended a data working group with ECan to learn more about information relating to water.

Garrick advised that this would be his final formal meeting with the Zone Committee. The Committee passed on thanks to Garrick for his contributions.

Aurora Smith – As well as the earlier update about the Moepuku Peninsula meeting, Aurora reported that Rapaki had received $4.5M Jobs for Nature funding for restoration work.

Gina Waibl – Gina informed the meeting about a presentation she and Aurora had given to the Banks Peninsula Community Board on 17 May 2021, and the discussion held with the Board about alignment and working more closely with them on matters in common.

Page 5

Item No.: 10 Page 65 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

Banks Peninsula Water Management Zone

Committee

18 May 2021

Rima Herber – Reported on a Resilient Hurunui talk by Di Lucas & Associates regarding integrated farm planning – this has a tie to Banks Peninsula as all land contributes.

Liz Macpherson – Advised she has been researching freshwater and marine law, and policy

Item 10 research.

Rik Tainui – Reported that DOC and ECan have visited Ōnuku Marae regarding the introduction of kēkēwai (freshwater crayfish) for a mahinga kai project. Kēkēwai clean the stream. On 1 June, ECan

Councillors will visit Ōnuku. This will include Taumutu and Wairewa Rūnanga also.

Pam Richardson referred to the issue of soil mapping.

4. Confirmation of Previous Minutes Committee Resolved BPZC/2021/00015

That the minutes of the Banks Peninsula Water Management Zone Committee meeting held on Tuesday, 16 March 2021 be confirmed.

Attachment K Gina Waibl/Garrick Thorn Carried

5. Matters Arising from the Minutes No matters arising.

The meeting closed with a Karakia/Whakamutunga.

Meeting concluded at 7.17pm.

CONFIRMED THIS 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021

GINA WAIBL CHAIRPERSON

Page 6

Item No.: 10 Page 66 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

Memos

Memo

Date: 18/06/2021 Item 10 From: Andrew Bullock – Team Leader Road Maintenance BP

To: Banks Peninsula Community Board Cc: Liz Carter – Community Board Advisor Reference: 21/853961 Adding Pages Road Extension To Asset Register

1. Purpose of this Memo 1.1 The purpose of this memo is to provide information to the Board to fulfil their resolution request of 19/10/2020 BKCB/2020/00103. In reference to Item 4.1 - Unsealed Portion of Pages

Road in these minutes, request a report from staff detailing the process to add the unsealed Attachment L portion of Pages Road in Lyttelton to the Council’s Asset Register, the work and any costs involved to do so and any other information required to enable the Board to make a decision. 1.2 To consider Staff’s advice to not formally improve and thereafter maintain this section of road.

2. Background Additions to Council’s Assets It has been checked and staff do have the authority to add roads to Council’s Asset Register but do not have the authority to undertake capital expenditure which is not allowed for in the LTP/Annual Plan. Adding this section of Pages Road in its current state without being upgraded does not comply with the Banks Peninsula Roading Policy, which states:

2.3 New Assets should be designed and constructed to Council Standards, namely Councils published “Infrastructure and Design Standards” (IDS) and “Construction Standard Specifications” (CSS) to ensure public safety, ensure maintenance is practical and reasonable to undertake and to ensure environmental compliance for material use, control of water run- off, for example . 2.4 The unsealed extent of Pages Road wishing to be added to Council’s road network for future maintenance does not come close to IDS or CSS requirements. 2.5 In essence the section of road in question remains a paper road as Council has never formally maintained nor improved it.

Item No.: 0 Page 1

Item No.: 10 Page 67 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

Memos

2.6 To upgrade the road would require Capital expenditure to create a new asset, which would need to be agreed in the LTP/Annual Plan process. Specific history of the development of 10 Pages Road 2.7 The unsealed portion of Pages Road remains un-maintained by Council, as it was never constructed to Council standards, as set out in the email to Cr Turner in the attachment to this Item 10 report.

2.8 Council only currently maintains the sealed section of Pages Road.

2.9 The unsealed section is classed as a private access over road reserve/public land. Effectively their driveway, the same as a properties private driveway from a formed carriageway of a road to their property boundary 2.10 The original properties dwelling and access was previously via Cressy Tce (28 Cressy Terrace) but in the mid 1980’s the then property owner obtained consent to build another dwelling on the site to be accessed off Pages Road. 2.11 The original dwelling at 28 Cressy Tce was subsequently subdivided off in 1987 with the lot Mr Ghisel now owns being provided access via a legal unformed access off the end of Pages Road. 2.12 The developer of this lot (Mr Ghisel’s) did not extend Pages Road and no formal adoption of

any works, i.e. road or drainage improvements, was ever made Council. Attachment L 2.13 Following are 3 aerial photos showing how the owner of the property has developed the area over time.

Figure 1 - 1970 Prior to subdivision development

Item No.: 0 Page 2

Item No.: 10 Page 68 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

Memos

Item 10

Attachment L

Figure 2 - 1990 Property subdivided with new house & driveway constructed

Figure 3 - Driveway extended to allow access to top of property

Item No.: 0 Page 3

Item No.: 10 Page 69 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

Memos

Managing a Paper Road 2.14 A paper road must at all times afford public access. Council has not prevented works which offers some benefit to the adjacent land owner, so long as they do not affect the general public’s right of way by causing restriction to access (e.g. gates) or any material safety Item 10 concerns.

2.15 The use of a paper road does not provide any landowner with any right of occupation nor ownership of it beyond the general publics.

2.16 The Council could evoke Section 357 of the Local Government Act to impose penalties for encroachment if it considers this occupation unfavourable to public access. 2.17 If Council itself makes no physical changes to the paper road itself, i.e. we leave it to remain as natural slope/form, Council is not obligated to undertake any maintenance responsibility. 2.18 Work by others to “improve” a paper road are often latterly acknowledged, as similarly occurs elsewhere across NZ, and left as modified, where such changes clearly do not dis-benefit the general public access, in any way. Such work, being in no way authorised or often known of in advance, does not confer maintenance responsibilities to Council (having given no formal approval for such, or overseen such works are built to a specific standard).

Attachment L Cost to improve Pages Road 2.19 The section of track that Mr Ghisel wants Council to seal and maintain is currently unsealed and approximately 2.5m-3.5m wide within a road reserve width that narrows from 6.24m down to 4.09m. 2.20 The rough order of costs to upgrade and seal the track is $55,000. The high cost of improvement is due to the narrow and steep environment, which limits the size and type of plant that can be used during construction. (Note, this estimate was obtained using our best judgement in consultation with our maintenance contractor. No detailed design work has been done.) 2.21 The improvements that could be made within the road reserve would be limited by the narrowness of the inherent width of the land parcel. Hence, accommodating passing traffic, turn around areas, with adjacent hillside drainage, would be impossible to achieve to Council’s necessary standards for it to comply with our design standards. Implications of Improving and adopting Pages Road 2.22 Staff note that Mr Ghisel’s wooden car deck is lower than the existing track level which would require careful design to ensure the shaping of the road and drainage was controlled to avoid the current flow path (which is causing scour around the piles). 2.23 Staff consider that the current drainage issues that have resulted in scour around Mr Ghisel wooden car deck were created by unconsented works carried out in late 2015/early 2016 when the previous property owner further extended their driveway over the paper road to create vehicular access to the upper portion of their property. 2.24 Staff could undertake limited upgrade work to the drainage along the unsealed track utilising the Rural Roads Drainage Renewals capital budget. Whilst this could reduce the runoff onto and under Mr Ghisel’s wooden driveway, Council would in effect be “improving” a Paper road, i.e. changing it from its natural state, and thus liable thereafter for all management of issues in and across it and may result from it.

Item No.: 0 Page 4

Item No.: 10 Page 70 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

Memos

3. Conclusion Adding this section of Pages Road to Councils asset register for ongoing maintenance in its current condition is contrary to Banks Peninsula Roading Policy. 3.2 There is significant cost to improving the paper road to a standard that Staff would consider worthy of adoption. Item 10 3.3 Staff confirm there is no allocation for the bulk of the work in the current LTP, and that the benefit to the wider public is limited, particularly given it is also thereafter liable for all maintenance costs of any such work, and risk of creating adverse effects to other adjacent

owners. 3.4 The formation and maintenance of a direct access to these private properties would be inconsistent to other property owners across the Council’s network. 3.5 If the Owners were to construct and form the current access fully to Council’s standards, which would include obtaining extra land to achieve the necessary road widths, and adhered to all relevant consent conditions in doing so, Staff would be receptive to adopting the road to maintain at the appropriate level of service.

Attachments Ngā Tāpirihanga Attachment L No. Title Page A Email to Councillor Turner - 10 Pages Road - Background Notes

Signatories Ngā Kaiwaitohu Author Andrew Bullock - Team Leader Road Maintenance Banks Peninsula Approved By Mark Pinner - Manager City Streets Maintenance

Item No.: 0 Page 5

Item No.: 10 Page 71 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board 26 July 2021

11. Elected Members’ Information Exchange Te Whakawhiti Whakaaro o Te Kāhui Amorangi

This item provides an opportunity for Board Members to update each other on recent events and/or issues of relevance and interest to the Board.

Item 11

Page 72