DOCSLIB.ORG

The 2018 Preqin Private Capital Fund Terms Advisor – Sample Pages

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The 2018 Preqin Private Capital Fund Terms Advisor – Sample Pages THE 2018 PREQIN PRIVATE CAPITAL FUND TERMS ADVISOR – SAMPLE PAGES 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Fig. 1.1: Annual Global Private Capital Fundraising, 2000 - 2018 YTD (As at June 2018) 2,500 2,307 2,340 2,044 1,945 2,000 1,855 1,632 1,642 1,659 nvestors remain satisfied with private The opaque nature of private capital 1,570 1,500 1,424 capital, with fundraising in 2017 surpassing investments makes it consistently difficult 1,333 I 1,183 1,118 the $800bn mark for the first time on record for a consensus or benchmark to be reached 1,000 921 (Fig. 1.1). More capital was also distributed across the industry. Unique features change 811 768 848 667 688 712 669 700 across fewer funds, resulting in the average the profile of a given fund, and greatly 605 583 547 587 575 500 387 451 fund size growing to $507mn in 2017 affect how fees are set out and levied. 2017 365 327 322 274 239 172 222 compared to $411mn in 2016. This suggests once again saw greater movement towards 135 106 that competition in the market remains transparency throughout the industry, as 0 fierce and that managers will need to ensure voiced by many investors interviewed by 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 they are continually providing satisfaction Preqin during the course of the year. It is to and striving for an alignment of interests clear at this point that the momentum is 2018 YTD Year of Final Close with their LPs. Positive investor sentiment is shifting towards the demands of the investor, No. of Funds Closed Aggregate Capital Raised ($bn) encouraging for the industry, with investors especially in a hyper-competitive private recognizing the benefits of utilizing private capital fundraising environment. equity, private debt, real estate, infrastructure Fig. 1.2: Extent to Which LPs Believe that GP and LP Interests Are Properly Aligned, and natural resources in their investment The 2018 Preqin Private Capital 2013 - 2017 portfolios to achieve their individual Fund Terms Advisor offers the most 100% 4% 4% 5% investment objectives. comprehensive data and intelligence on fund 10% 6% terms and conditions in the industry and 90% In an intensely competitive fundraising aims to reveal the latest trends and current 80% market, it is important for GPs to closely market sentiment that surrounds this opaque 70% Strongly Agree align interests with LPs in the terms and area. The 12th edition in the series, the Fund 63% 59% 57% 60% 60% 65% conditions agreement to ensure a positive Terms Advisor uses fund terms for over 9,100 Agree working relationship during a fund’s lifespan, private capital funds and compiles data from 50% and potentially thereafter, and maximize our current databases, historical datasets and Disagree profitability of both the firm and the LP and GP surveys to provide comprehensive 40% institutional investor. If this is accomplished, it and accurate insight into the private capital 30% Strongly Disagree becomes more likely that the LP would look to fund terms universe. 27% 20% re-invest should the economic environment Proportion of LP Respondents 32% 27% 35% 25% prove conducive to doing so. Additionally, any LP SATISFACTION WITH ALIGNMENT OF 10% problems in fund terms and conditions from INTERESTS 10% 0% 1% 4% 2% 5% the outset may be compounded over the In December 2017, we asked LPs throughout Jun-13 Jun-14 Jun-15 Dec-16 Dec-17 lifespan of the fund. the private capital industry for their views on © 2018 Preqin Ltd. 1 THE 2018 PREQIN PRIVATE CAPITAL FUND TERMS ADVISOR – SAMPLE PAGES fund terms and conditions and to what extent fees broken down by peer group, vintage year Fig. 1.3: Frequency with Which LPs Have Decided Not to Invest in a Fund Due to the Proposed they remain a concern. The results revealed and strategy, and the key issues among GP Terms and Conditions that 70% of participants believe that GP and and LP groups. LP interests are properly aligned (Fig. 1.2), up seven percentage points from the proportion TRENDS IN PRIVATE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT 14% of LPs surveyed at the end of 2016. The FEES 23% opposing 30% of respondents felt that Figs 1.5 and 1.6 show the average buyout improvements could be made on the part of fund management fees charged by both Frequently the GP to better align interests. vintage year and fund size. The median management fee for buyout funds has Occasionally In this publication, Chapters 5 and 6 remained static at 2.00%, while the mean fee investigate fund terms and conditions for reported to Preqin has shown some variance Never alternative arrangements such as separate since 2007, generally trending downward accounts and co-investments, with many LPs to vintage 2015 and standing at 1.94% for recognizing the benefits of exposure to such vintage 2018/funds currently raising. As seen vehicles, largely due to the associated fund in Fig. 1.6, management fees decrease as the 63% terms. Chapter 11, which covers governance, fund size increases, with funds more than shows that GPs appear committed to offering $2bn in size reporting a mean management more ways to align interests in a fund, among fee of 1.72%, compared to the 2.13% reported those key-man clauses, no-fault divorce by funds smaller than $100mn. clauses and LP advisory committees. Fig. 1.4: Areas in Which LPs Believe the Alignment of GP and LP Interests Can Be Improved THE 2018 PREQIN PRIVATE CAPITAL FUND MANAGEMENT FEES CAN STILL BE TERMS ADVISOR Management Fees 64% IMPROVED Private capital fund terms and conditions Transparency at Fund Level 43% For the majority (86%) of investors remain a fundamental and important interviewed at the end of 2017, fund terms aspect of both the fund agreements and Performance Fees - How They Are Charged 30% and conditions are so important that they the relationship between GPs and LPs. have on at least one occasion decided not Preqin data in this publication shows that Hurdle Rate 30% to invest in a fund because of the proposed investors have increased their leverage GP Commitment to Fund 26% arrangement (Fig. 1.3). Management fees over fund terms (particularly in the case and transparency are the key areas in which of large LP commitments, investments Performance Fees - Amount 18% LPs believe alignment of interests can be before a fund’s first close, non-economic improved, as true in previous years (Fig. 1.4). clauses etc.), and their negotiating power Lock-up Period 14% Thirty percent of respondents would each like has grown significantly as GPs are eager to Other 3% to see improvements in the hurdle rate and secure institutional capital in a competitive in the implementation of performance fees. fundraising environment. Yet the issue is 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% Chapter 9 looks more closely at management not as simple as GPs purely lowering their Proportion of LP Respondents 2 © 2018 Preqin Ltd. THE 2018 PREQIN PRIVATE CAPITAL FUND TERMS ADVISOR – SAMPLE PAGES headline fees to entice LPs, as to attract LPs mezzanine), real estate, infrastructure and Fig. 1.5: Buyout Funds – Average Management Fee by Vintage Year and justify terms and conditions GPs must natural resources. 2.1% also be able to demonstrate the following: 2.02% their commitment to meaningfully align NET COST LISTINGS 2.00%2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00% interests with investors, their skill and ability Other key features of this year’s publication 2.0% 1.98% 1.99% 1.96% to generate above-average performance include listings of over 1,200 named funds 1.95% 1.94% 1.94% 1.94% (through key personnel and a solid track showing the net costs incurred by LPs 1.91%1.92% Mean record) and their consideration of other annually (the summary of information on 1.9% aspects of the Limited Partner Agreement total costs has been obtained through 1.84% 1.84% Median such as governance structures, carry, carry Freedom of Information requests to public structures and fee rebates. pension funds in the US and UK, unlike 1.8% the detailed listings of fund terms). The The 2018 Preqin Private Capital Fund publication also contains a listing of some Investment Period Management Fee Terms Advisor focuses its analysis on of the most active law firms in private 1.7% the very latest fund terms and conditions capital fund formation, including sample 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 information collected by Preqin. Preqin assignments. 2018/ Raising goes to great lengths to capture as much up-to-date, relevant data as possible, We hope that you findThe 2018 Preqin Vintage Year and provides the best source of data for Private Capital Fund Terms Advisor to be industry professionals looking for the latest a valuable reference guide and, as ever, we Fig. 1.6: Buyout Funds – Average Management Fee by Fund Size (Funds Raising & Vintage information; we track fund terms and welcome any feedback and comments that 2017/2018 Funds Closed) conditions data for over 9,100 private capital you may have for future editions. 2.5% funds and have conducted exclusive surveys 2.13% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 1.96% 2.00% 1.98% 1.95% with LPs and GPs from around the world. 2.0% This edition provides readers with the actual 1.72% 1.75% terms employed by individual vehicles, as well 1.5% Mean as benchmark terms.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Review Risk Management Institue
    NOV 2016 · VOL 3 PRIVATE EQUITY GOSS INSTITUTE OF RESEARCH MANAGEMENT LIMITED NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE REVIEW RISK MANAGEMENT INSTITUE HAITAO JIN Qianhai Fund of Fund, LLP Exploring the Business Model of China’s Private Equity/Venture Capital (PE/VC) Fund of Funds (FOF) Investments KATAHIRA MASAKI Eastasia Investment (International) Limited New Findings on Japan’s Capital Market: A Study on Japan Post Group’s Successful Transformation through Capital Market WEI CUI, MIN DAI, AND STEVEN KOU Risk Management Institute’s New Research Initiative A Pricing and Risk Management System for Chinese Bonds PRIVATE EQUITY REVIEW PRIVATE EQUITY REVIEW CONTENTS EDITORIAL BOARD Darrell Duffie, Stanford University MESSAGE FROM THE EDITORS Quanjian Gao (Editor-in-Chief), GOSS Institute of Research COVER ARTICLE Management Ltd. 01 Exploring the Business Model of Jeff Hong (Co-Editor), China’s Private Equity/Venture Capital (PE/VC) City University of Hong Kong Fund of Funds (FOF) Investments Li Jin, Haitao Jin Oxford University Steven Kou (Co-Editor), ACADEMIC INSIGHTS National University of Singapore 10 New Findings on Japan’s Capital Market: Neng Wang, A Study on Japan Post Group’s Successful Columbia University Transformation Through Capital Market Houmin Yan, Katahira Masaki City University of Hong Kong Lin Zhou, CASE STUDY Shanghai Jiao Tong University 22 Will Private Equity (PE) Firms Continue to Invest in China’s Auto Consumption and Sales Industry? Yankun Hou ADVISORY BOARD 32 Quantitative Methods for Venture Capital Investment Weijian Shan,
    [Show full text]
  • Icapital Invites Accredited Investors to Gain Broad Exposure to Private Equity Managed by Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. (“
    iCAPITAL KKR PRIVATE MARKETS FUND PERFORMANCE UPDATE I NOVEMBER 2020 iCapital invites accredited investors to gain broad exposure to private equity managed by Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. (“KKR”) via the iCapital KKR Private Markets Fund, a continuously offered registered closed-end fund.1 Investment Objective and Unique Fund Features There is no guarantee that any investment will achieve its objectives, generate profits or avoid losses. Diversification does not assure a profit or protect against loss in a positive or declining market. • The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation • Diversification across investment types, strategies, • Broad exposure to KKR private equity geographies and vintages • Sub-adviser, StepStone Group, provides • Lower minimum investment than traditional recommendations and sourcing advantages private equity on opportunities and portfolio construction • 1099 tax reporting and no capital calls Monthly Returns (%) iCapital KKR Private Markets Fund (08/01/15–11/30/2020) MSCI S&P 500 ACWI CLASS A Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec YTD TR YTD YTD 2020 -0.50% -2.31% -6.81% 2.14% 0.54% 2.18% 1.08% 1.15% 7.02% -0.35% 4.11% 3.64% 2.77% -1.09% 2019 2.34% 0.81% 1.54% 0.14% -1.37% 2.60% 0.29% -0.29% 0.00% 0.29% 0.58% 1.91% 9.13% 31.49% 26.60% 2018 -0.36% -0.73% 0.44% 0.44% 0.51% 2.81% 0.07% 0.21% 2.28% -2.65% -0.07% -1.06% 1.80% -4.38% -9.42% 2017 0.00% 0.75% 0.45% 0.82% 0.52% 2.68% -0.14% -0.22% 1.38% 0.00% -0.65% 2.76% 8.62% 21.83% 23.97% 2016 -2.08% -0.82% 4.54% -1.03% 0.56% 2.85% 0.23% 0.69% 2.83% 0.15%
    [Show full text]
  • Private Markets Fees Primer WHITEPAPER OCTOBER 2019
    Private Markets Fees Primer WHITEPAPER OCTOBER 2019 This primer describes the most common fee and profit sharing arrangements CONTRIBUTORS associated with private market investments. It attempts to answer common Blaze Cass Andrew Gilboard questions when considering an investment across the range of private market John Haggerty, CFA asset classes, including private equity, private debt, infrastructure, real estate, and natural resources. Most private market vehicles have the following fee and profit sharing components: I. Management fees II. Carried interest: → Preferred return → Catch-up provision → Carried interest rate The above terms will be explored throughout this primer, including definitions, common structures, and their expected impact on net returns to the Limited Partner (“Investor”). Finally, this primer will examine industry trends by investment strategy, as well as how the structuring of fees and profit sharing arrangements impacts the alignment between Investors and the General Partner (“Manager”). While there are a variety of fee and profit sharing structures found across the private markets universe, for the purposes of this primer we focus on one of the most common, the so-called “2/8/20” model that prevails for closed-end vehicles (“Funds”) executing a private equity buyout strategy. Note that, in the Appendix, common variations from this structure—seen with other strategies—are outlined. What is a management fee? A management fee is a fee paid in regular intervals (typically quarterly, semi-annually, or annually) to the Manager in order to compensate them for managing the Fund. The management fee is generally used by the Manager to cover the overhead costs associated with executing the Fund’s strategy, such as, but not limited to, salaries and benefits, office rent, and day-to-day administrative costs incurred by the Manager.
    [Show full text]
  • PWC and Elwood
    2020 Crypto Hedge Fund Report Contents Introduction to Crypto Hedge Fund Report 3 Key Takeaways 4 Survey Data 5 Investment Data 6 Strategy Insights 6 Market Analysis 7 Assets Under Management (AuM) 8 Fund performance 9 Fees 10 Cryptocurrencies 11 Derivatives and Leverage 12 Non-Investment Data 13 Team Expertise 13 Custody and Counterparty Risk 15 Governance 16 Valuation and Fund Administration 16 Liquidity and Lock-ups 17 Legal and Regulatory 18 Tax 19 Survey Respondents 20 About PwC & Elwood 21 Introduction to Crypto Hedge Fund report In this report we provide an overview of the global crypto hedge fund landscape and offer insights into both quantitative elements (such as liquidity terms, trading of cryptocurrencies and performance) and qualitative aspects, such as best practice with respect to custody and governance. By sharing these insights with the broader crypto industry, our goal is to encourage the adoption of sound practices by market participants as the ecosystem matures. The data contained in this report comes from research that was conducted in Q1 2020 across the largest global crypto hedge funds by assets under management (AuM). This report specifically focuses on crypto hedge funds and excludes data from crypto index/tracking/passive funds and crypto venture capital funds. 3 | 2020 Crypto Hedge Fund Report Key Takeaways: Size of the Market and AuM: Performance and Fees: • We estimate that the total AuM of crypto hedge funds • The median crypto hedge fund returned +30% in 2019 (vs - globally increased to over US$2 billion in 2019 from US$1 46% in 2018). billion the previous year.
    [Show full text]
  • DENVER CAPITAL MATRIX Funding Sources for Entrepreneurs and Small Business
    DENVER CAPITAL MATRIX Funding sources for entrepreneurs and small business. Introduction The Denver Office of Economic Development is pleased to release this fifth annual edition of the Denver Capital Matrix. This publication is designed as a tool to assist business owners and entrepreneurs with discovering the myriad of capital sources in and around the Mile High City. As a strategic initiative of the Denver Office of Economic Development’s JumpStart strategic plan, the Denver Capital Matrix provides a comprehensive directory of financing Definitions sources, from traditional bank lending, to venture capital firms, private Venture Capital – Venture capital is capital provided by investors to small businesses and start-up firms that demonstrate possible high- equity firms, angel investors, mezzanine sources and more. growth opportunities. Venture capital investments have a potential for considerable loss or profit and are generally designated for new and Small businesses provide the greatest opportunity for job creation speculative enterprises that seek to generate a return through a potential today. Yet, a lack of needed financing often prevents businesses from initial public offering or sale of the company. implementing expansion plans and adding payroll. Through this updated resource, we’re striving to help connect businesses to start-up Angel Investor – An angel investor is a high net worth individual active in and expansion capital so that they can thrive in Denver. venture financing, typically participating at an early stage of growth. Private Equity – Private equity is an individual or consortium of investors and funds that make investments directly into private companies or initiate buyouts of public companies. Private equity is ownership in private companies that is not listed or traded on public exchanges.
    [Show full text]
  • 18032 Investcorp MD&A P7-76 Tp
    INVESTCORP MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY During its fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 (FY09), Investcorp has witnessed what has been, arguably,the worst period of sustained stress to world economies and financial markets in living memory.The environment has had a severe impact on Investcorp across both its client and its investment businesses, and it has been the most challenging year for Investcorp since its formation in 1982. The management team has focused on dealing with these challenges head on. It has maintained an active and open dialog with clients throughout the year and has protected the balance sheet by raising capital, reducing investment risk and mitigating re-financing risk by holding high levels of cash liquidity while de-leveraging the balance sheet at the same time. The successful completion of a preference share issue in excess of $500 million, more than double the stated minimum target, in such a difficult environment is clear evidence of confidence in Investcorp’s business model and management team. Although the length and depth of the global recession is still uncertain, management believes that the firm action taken during the fiscal year will enable Investcorp to move forward and focus on the attractive business opportunities that now present themselves. BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT The sub-prime housing crisis that started in the United States in 2007 developed in late calendar year 2008 into a major systemic financial crisis, sending economic activity in the developed world into a synchronized downward spiral.This has led the IMF to make continual downward revisions to its estimate for global growth in calendar years 2009 and 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation April 2018
    Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation April 2018 Confidential – Not for Publication or Distribution Disclaimer Statements included herein may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which may relate to future events or the future performance or financial condition of Ares Commercial Real Estate Management LLC (“ACREM”), a subsidiary of Ares Management, L.P. (“Ares LP”), Ares LP, certain of their subsidiaries and certain funds and accounts managed by ACREM, Ares LP and/or their subsidiaries, including, without limitation, Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation (“ACRE”). These statements are not guarantees of future results or financial condition and involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors, including the returns on current and future investments, rates of repayments and prepayments on ACRE’s mortgage loans, availability of investment opportunities, ACRE’s ability to originate additional investments and completion of pending investments, the availability of capital, the availability of cost financing, market trends and conditions in ACRE’s industry and the general economy, the level of lending and borrowing spreads, commercial real estate loan volumes, government-sponsored enterprise activity and other risks described from time to time in ACRE’s and ARES LP’s filings within the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Any forward- looking statement, including any contained herein, speaks only as of the time of this release and none of ACRE, ARES LP nor ACREM undertakes any duty to update any forward-looking statements made herein.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2018 - 2019
    ANNUAL REPORT 2018 - 2019 ANNUAL REPORT 2018 - 2019 LEADING OUR PORTFOLIO COMPANIES FOR THE BENEFIT OF OUR ECONOMY. CONTENTS 1. Message from Chairman and CEO 5 2. Business model and investment strategy 9 3. Value creation starting from 4 central themes 23 4. Results and activity report 35 5. Key figures 41 6. Share and shareholders 45 7. Corporate Governance Statement 49 8. Annual Accounts 77 9. Contact 141 INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO EUR 1.1 BILLION OUR 55 PORTFOLIO COMPANIES JOINTLY REALISE A TURNOVER OF MORE THAN EUR 2.75 BILLION AND EMPLOY 14 000 PROFESSIONALS FOCUS ON VALUE CREATION FROM 4 PLATFORMS CONNECTED HEALTH SMART SUSTAINABLE CONSUMER & CARE INDUSTRIES CITIES 4 OFFICES WITH MULTIDISCIPLINARY TEAMS: ANTWERP, PARIS, THE HAGUE, MUNICH 39 YEARS’ EXPERIENCE IN PRIVATE EQUITY OVER THE LAST 5 YEARS INVESTED IN 932 EUR MILLION 46 COMPANIES PROCEEDS FROM 1 520 EUR MILLION 48 EXITS MESSAGE FROM CHAIRMAN AND CEO1 6 ANNUAL REPORT 2018-2019 The world around us is changing at an incredible pace. Last year we were still talk- ing about an improving economy that had moved up several gears; today, barely a year later, we see this economic upswing under threat from various geopolitical and macroeconomic factors. Trade relations are more difficult, the power posi- IMPACT: MEETING CRUCIAL tions and therefore also the relationships between CHALLENGES TOGETHER the major world economic powers are shifting, as evidenced by the never-ending story of Brexit. Gimv goes looking for the market leaders of Last year, climate and the environment concerns tomorrow, together with which it can make a vi- topped the political and economic agenda, calling tal difference, year after year.
    [Show full text]
  • Investment Companies 13 October 2011
    www.numiscorp.com Marketing Communication Investment Companies 13 October 2011 Research Listed Private Equity Charles Cade +44 (0)20 7260 1327 What are the True Costs? [email protected] George Crowe Transparency has improved significantly within the listed Private Equity sector in +44 (0)20 7260 1280 recent years, and valuation methodologies have become more standardised with [email protected] the adoption of fair value accounting. This has made it much easier for investors Ewan Lovett-Turner to differentiate between listed Private Equity funds (LPEs) on the basis of their +44 (0)20 7260 1299 portfolio characteristics and balance sheet risk. However, it is still far from [email protected] straight-forward to compare the costs of LPEs in terms of fees and finance Colette Ord charges. In contrast, private equity Limited Partnerships (LPs) have relatively +44 (0)20 7260 1290 standardised fee arrangements and simple balance sheets with no debt. [email protected] In part, these complications reflect the evergreen nature of most LPEs, whereby they Sales offer exposure to a range of investment vintages. As a result, management fees are James Glass typically charged on the value of assets rather than initial commitments. Listed funds +44 (0)20 7260 1369 also face additional operating costs such as directors‟ fees and administration, and often [email protected] adopt more diverse investment strategies, including directs, co-investment and funds. Chris G00k Some have feeder fund structures, with fees charged indirectly by the manager, while +44 (0)20 7260 1378 others are self-managed and pay staff costs rather than a defined management fee.
    [Show full text]
  • Structured Finance
    Financial Institutions U.S.A. Investcorp Bank B.S.C. Full Rating Report Ratings Key Rating Drivers Investcorp Bank B.S.C. Strong Gulf Franchise: The ratings of Investcorp B.S.C. (Investcorp, or the company) reflect Long-Term IDR BB Short-Term IDR B the company’s strong client franchise in the Gulf, established track record in private equity (PE) Viability Rating bb and commercial real estate investment, strong capital levels and solid funding profile. Rating constraints include sizable balance sheet co-investments and potential earnings volatility and Investcorp S.A. Investcorp Capital Ltd. placement risks presented by the business model, which could pressure interest coverage. Long-Term IDR BB Short-Term IDR B Gulf Institutional Owners Positive: The Positive Rating Outlook reflects franchise and Senior Unsecured Debt BB earnings benefits that may accrue to Investcorp from the 20% strategic equity stake sale to Support Rating Floor NF Mubadala Development Co. (Mubadala) in March 2017, a sovereign wealth fund of Abu Dhabi. This follows a 9.99% equity stake sale to another Gulf-based institution in 2015. Fitch Ratings Rating Outlook Positive views these transactions favorably, as the relationships may give Investcorp expanded access to potential new investors as well as a more stable equity base. 3i Business Diversifies AUM: The cash-funded acquisition of 3i Debt Management (3iDM) in March 2017 added $10.8 billion in AUM and is expected to be accretive for Investcorp, adding Financial Data stable management fee income. However, the acquired co-investment assets and ongoing risk Investcorp Bank B.S.C. retention requirements do increase Investcorp’s balance sheet risk exposure.
    [Show full text]
  • 3/29/2016 Special Meeting
    Oregon Investment Council March 29, 2016 Special Meeting 10:00 AM Oregon State Treasury 16290 SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Tigard, OR 97224 Katy Durant Chair John Skjervem Chief Investment Officer Ted Wheeler State Treasurer OREGON INVESTMENT COUNCIL Agenda March 29, 2016 Special Meeting 10:00 AM Oregon State Treasury Investment Division Crater Lake Conference Room 16290 SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Tigard, OR 97224 Time Action Items Presenter Tab 10:00 AM 1. Cinven Sixth Fund, L.P. – OPERF Private Equity Michael Langdon 1 Senior Investment Officer Public Comment Invited Katy Durant Rukaiyah Adams Rex Kim John Russell Ted Wheeler Steve Rodeman Chair Vice Chair Member Member State Treasurer PERS Director Cinven Fund VI, L.P. Purpose Subject to satisfactory negotiation of terms and conditions with Staff working in concert with legal counsel, Staff recommends approval of a $250 million commitment to Cinven Fund VI, L.P. (the “Fund” or “Fund VI”) for the OPERF Private Equity Portfolio. This proposed commitment represents the planned continuation of an existing general partner relationship. Background The Fund is being formed and sponsored by Cinven Limited (“Cinven” or the “Firm”), and will continue the successful sector-focused, large European buyout strategy employed in the Firm’s first five funds. Cinven was founded in 1995 when the investment management division of British Coal went independent via a management buyout. With the various British Coal pension funds as anchor investors, Cinven launched its first institutional fund in 1996, raising €1.6 billion. Over time, Cinven has raised successively larger funds, and grown from the original eleven investment professionals operating from a single office in London to 65 investment professionals operating from offices in London, Paris, Frankfurt, Milan, Madrid, and with support offices in New York and Hong Kong.
    [Show full text]
  • Fresh Money 2013-Q4 Copyright
    Fresh Money 2013-Q4 http://jaycaplan.com/ Date VC/PE Website Headline Location Techrockies Reports that Boulder Ventures Is To Raise $100M 12/26/13 Boulder Ventures http://www.boulderventures.com/ Sixth Fund Boulder, CO Boston-based private equity firm Mansa Capital Management Raises $50M to invest in healthcare information technology (HCIT) and services companies that help to contain healthcare 12/21/13 Mansa Capital Management http://www.mansacapital.com/ costs and improve clinical outcomes Boston PE Firn Welsh, Carson, Anderson & Stowe Raising $3B 12th PE Fund for growth-oriented companies in the healthcare and 12/13/13 Welsh, Carson, Anderson & Stowe http://www.welshcarson.com/ information/business services industries New York 12/21/13 Economic Development Corp. http://www.nycedc.com/press-release/deputy-mayor-steel-and-nycedc-announce-two-new-initiatives-dramatically-grow-citysWSJ: New York City to Start $50M Venture Fund for Biotech New York Growth PE Firm Great Point Partners closes $215M health care 12/21/13 Great Point Partners http://www.gppfunds.com/ investment Fund II Greenwich, CT 12/13/13 Investor AB http://www.investorgrowthcapital.com/ Investor Growth Capital Ends Venture Investing New York Biomark Capital Forms $200M VC fund by Splitting Off from 12/3/13 Biomark Capital http://biomarkcapital.com/ Burrill Capital Greenwich, CT 12/3/13 5AM Venture Management http://5amventures.com/ 5AM Ventures Raises $250M Fourth Life Science Venture Fund Menlo Park CA, Boston MA Gilde Healthcare closes €145 million ($200 million) Utrecht, The Netherlands, 11/26/13 Gilde Healthcare http://www.gildehealthcare.com/ transatlantic growth capital fund Cambridge, MA Edmond de Rothschild Investment Partners Closes 4th €192M 11/4/13 Edmond de Rothschild Investment Partnershttp://www.edmond-de-rothschild.fr/En/edrip/Pages/default.aspxEuropean Life Science Fund Paris, France Palo Alto, CA, Boston, MA, Venture Debt Leader Hercules Technology Growth Capital Westminster, CO, McLean, VA, 11/4/13 Hercules Technology Growth Capital, http://www.htgc.com/Inc.
    [Show full text]