Hypofrontality in Men with First-Episode Psychosis
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY (2005), 186, 203^208 Hypofrontality in men with first-episode psychosis protocol, patients must have presented with first-episode psychosis with symptoms lasting more than 1 week, not attributable V. MOLINA, J. SANZ, S. REIG, R. MARTIMARTINEZ,¤NEZ, F. SARRAMEA, R. LUQUE, to organic or toxic origin, and unrelated C.BENITO,J.D.GISPERT,J.PASCAUandM.DESCOC. BENITO, J. D.GISPERT, J. PASCAU and M. DESCO to any other Axis I disorder; the presence ofofanyany relevant stressors clearly related to the episode had to be ruled out. We usedusedthesethese criteria in order to avoid recruitingrecruitingpatientspatients with transient psychotic symptoms,symptoms,according to DSM–IV criteria (American Psychiatric Association, 1994).1994). Background Decreased metabolic Decreased metabolic activity in the prefron- After inclusion, all patients were activity in the prefrontal cortex during tal cortex during cognitive activation is a followed for 2 years on an out-patient basis recurrent finding in schizophrenia (Volz with monthly visits, to confirm or rule out a cognitive activation is a recurrent finding et aletal, 1999). If it were not present in other diagnosis of schizophrenia at the end of this and a likely functionalfunctionalmarker marker of psychotic disorders, hypofrontality could period. After this follow-up, two experi- schizophrenia. constitute a distinctive marker for schizo- enced psychiatrists (V.M. and J.S.), masked phrenia. Although other groups have to the results of the PET scans, diagnosed Aims Toinvestigate the occurrence of published data on hypofrontality in schizo- each patient and decided whether the index hypofrontalityin patients with first- phreniform disorders (Andreasen et aletal,, episode was a first break of schizophrenia episode psychosis, with or without 1997), we know of none comparing meta- or, instead, a single psychotic episode that evolution to schizophrenia. bolic patterns in these patients in the light did not evolve into schizophrenia 2 years of whether or not they progress to schizo- after the enrolment. For this final diagnosis MethodMethod Weused fluorodeoxyglucose phrenia. To confirm hypofrontality as a they used all the available follow-up feature typical of schizophrenia, it would information (including total duration of positron emission tomography during the be advisable to study patients in very early significantsignificantsymptoms),symptoms), a semi-structured in- performance of an attentiontask and stages of the disease. This design requires terview, the Structured Clinical Interview magnetic resonance imaging to study the a corroboration of the diagnosis of schizo- for DSM–IVAccess I Disorders – Clinician dorsolateral prefrontal region in13 men phrenia by a prospective follow-up. With Version (SCID–CV; First et aletal, 1997) and with a first episode of psychosis.Data from this goal, we used magnetic resonance the information provided by the families imaging (MRI) and [1818F]fluorodeoxyglu- and clinical personnel. For diagnostic patients who progressed to schizophrenia cose (FDG) positron emission tomography purposes, the duration of symptoms was were compared withthose of patients (PET) to investigate two groups of people calculated covering the period before and who did not meet criteria for this diagnosis with first-episode psychosis: one group in after initiation of treatment. after 2 years. which the diagnosis of schizophrenia was On the basis of their final diagnosis, the confirmed 2 years later, and a group who 13 patients were divided into two groups. ResultsResults Patients who developed did not meet the criteria for this diagnosis The schizophrenia group comprised six schizophrenia demonstrated a significant after the same period. people with a diagnosis of paranoid schizo-schizo- phrenia according to DSM–IV criteria. TheThe hypofrontalityinthehypofrontality in the dorsolateral non-schizophrenia group comprised six prefrontal cortex in comparison with the METHOD people with a diagnosis of schizophreni- non-schizophrenia and control groups. form psychosis and one person who had Study participants experienced a brief psychotic disorder (with Conclusions Our results suggestthat The existence of gender-related differences a symptom duration of 3 weeks), likewise hypofrontalitycouldhypofrontality could be a marker of in frontal activity cannot be ruled out, con- according to DSM–IV criteria. The latter di- schizophrenia atthe time oftheof the first sidering that structural alterations seem to agnoses meant that these patients’ psychotic psychotic episode, in agreement with be more pronounced in men (Nopoulos episodesepisodeswere shorter than required to qua- et aletal, 1997). For this reason, and to achieve lify as schizophrenia, no other psychotic neurodevelopmental theories of maximum sample homogeneity, our study episode occurred during follow-up and the schizophrenia. was limited to men. Thirteen right-handed patients did not meet schizophrenia criteria men with a first psychotic episode were (including enduring negative symptoms) at Declaration of interest None.None. enrolled in a diachronic study of first-break the end of follow-up. The duration of the Funding detailed in Acknowledgements. schizophrenia; all of them were enrolled disease in the non-schizophrenia group while hospitalised for the first time in the was less than 3 months in all cases. The psychiatric unit of a general hospital. The clinical scores calculated using the Positive PET and MRI scans were performed at and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS; the time of inclusion in the study, before KayKay et aletal, 1992) at the time of admission any of the patients had met the criteria and at the end of follow-up are shown in for schizophrenia. To be included in the Table 1.Table1. 203 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. 27 Sep 2021 at 21:32:17, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use. MOLINA ET AL Ta b l e 1 Demographic and clinical characteristics of participants regional metabolic activity in the PET image (Molina et aletal, 2003).,2003). Schizophrenia Non-schizophrenia Control group (nn¼6) group ((group nn¼7) group ((group nn¼8)8) MRI protocol Mean (s.d.) Mean (s.d.) Mean (s.d.) Magnetic resonance images were acquired on a Philips Gyroscan 1.5 T scanner (Philips Age, years 24.2 (4.4) 29.1 (8.8)(8.8)29.1 28.7 (6.0)(6.0)28.7 Medical Systems, Reigate, UK) using a TT11-- Education, years 11.5 (4.6)10.9 (6.0)11.8 (4.9) weighted three-dimensional gradient echo Duration of disease, months before inclusion1.1(0.8) 1.1 (0.8) 0.9 0.9(0.6) (0.6) sequence with the following parameters: Parental socio-economic level 2.1 (1.8)2.2 (1.8)2.0 (1.6) matrix size 25666256, pixel size 0.9 mm66 PANSS score 0.9 mm (field of view approximately Positive symptoms 25625666256 mm), flip angle 3088, echo time Enrolment 19.9 (5.1)20.3 (6.1) 4.6 ms, slice thickness 1.1–1.5 mm. In addi- Follow-up 10.0 (3.4)7.2 (2.3) tion,tion, TT22-weighted sequences were acquired Negative symptoms for tissue segmentation and for other clini- Enrolment 15.6 (6.3)12.9 (7.5) cal purposes (turbo spin echo, turbo factor 15, echo time 120 ms, matrix size Follow-up 20.6 (8.3)7.4 (4.1) 25625666256, slice thickness 5.5 mm). General symptoms Enrolment 33.4 (7.1) 30.5 (8.8)(8.8)30.5 Follow-up 30.1 (9.5)(9.5)30.1 17.4 (7.7) PET protocolprotocolPET The PET study used a Siemens Exact 47 PANSS, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale. tomograph (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). Scans were obtained 20 min after injecting All patients were antipsychotic-naıantipsychotic-naıve¨ve after completing the treatment). The period 370 MBq of [1818F]FDG, while the partici- prior to the presenting episode; they were of complete remission of these symptoms pant performed a contingent continuous treated solely during the 2 days prior to was greater than 1 year in all cases. performance test (Rosvold et aletal, 1956).,1956). the PET scan. This was a practical means Eight healthy men were also recruited Participants were instructed to push a button of enrolling a sample representative of the as a control reference group. To match if a letter T immediately followed the letter usual presentation of schizophrenia, avoid- them with the patient group, none had an L, presented on a computer screen. The ing a selection bias related to the impaired education to college level. No difference interstimulus interval was 1 s. During the ability of patients with acute psychosis to in age or parental socio-economic level PET scan a neuropsychologist supervised cooperate during neuroimaging procedures. (Hollingshead & Frederick, 1953) was the appropriate response and full compli- All patients received the same treatment observed between the groups (Table 1). ance with the performance test of all parti- (haloperidol 10 mg per day liquid formula- Exclusion criteria for patients and con- cipants. After an intravenous line had been tion) and the medication was discontinued trols were learning disability, neurological inserted for FDG administration, the parti- for 12 h prior to the PET scan. No other disease, MRI findings deemed clinically cipant began the task, which was divided treatment was administered before scan- relevant (from a neurological perspective) into four blocks of 5 min each, with a ning. One patient from the schizophrenia by a radiologist masked to the diagnosis, 1 min rest between blocks; FDG was group and two from the non-schizophrenia history of head trauma with loss of con- administered 1 min after initiating the task. group had received benzodiazepines for sciousness, and history of substance misuse Participants were instructed to fast for at insomnia before inclusion, but they had during the past 6 months (other than occa- least 6 h before the scan, with particular iscontinuediscontinuedthisthis medication for more than sional hypnotics). A urinalysis was done in emphasis on avoiding coffee and other 2 weeks.