"Biodegradative Analysis of Municipal Solid Waste in Laboratory-Scale

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

United States National Risk Management Environmental Protection Research Laboratory Agency Research Triangle Park NC 27711 Research and Development EPA/600/SR-97/071 September 1997 Project Summary Biodegradative Analysis of Municipal Solid Waste in Laboratory-Scale Landfills M. A. Barlaz, W. E. Eleazer, W. S. Odle, III, X. Qian, and Y-S. Wang The objective of this research was to to the relatively low concentration of characterize the anaerobic biodegrad- food waste in MSW. ability of the major biodegradable com- Most probable number (MPN) tests ponents of municipal solid waste were conducted to identify the compo- (MSW). Tests were conducted in qua- nents of refuse that carry refuse-de- druplicate in 2-L reactors operated to composing microorganisms into obtain maximum yields. Measured landfills and to evaluate the significance methane (CH4) yields for grass, leaves, of two typical cover soils as carriers of branches, food waste, coated paper, refuse-decomposing microbes. Grass, old newsprint, old corrugated contain- leaves, and branches were the major ers, and office paper were 144.4, 30.6, identifiable contributors of refuse-de- 62.6, 300.7, 84.4, 74.3, 152.3, and 217.3 composing microbes to landfills, while mL CH4/dry g, respectively. While there the cover soils tested did not typically was a general trend of increasing CH4 contain populations with the activities yield with increasing cellulose plus required for refuse methanogenesis. hemicellulose (carbohydrate) content, This Project Summary was developed many confounding factors precluded by EPA’s Air Pollution Prevention and establishment of a quantitative relation- Control Division of the National Risk ship. Similarly, the degree of lignifica- Management Research Laboratory, Re- tion of a particular component was not search Triangle Park, NC, to announce a good predictor of the extent of bio- key findings of the research project that degradation. is fully documented in a separate report In parallel with the decomposition ex- of the same title (see Project Report periments, leachate from the decom- ordering information at back). position of each refuse constituent was analyzed for toxicity using a modified Introduction anaerobic toxicity assay. Leachate tox- Approximately 62% of the municipal icity was not found in association with solid waste (MSW) generated in the U.S. the decomposition of any refuse com- is disposed of by burial in a sanitary land- fill. The production of methane (CH ) from ponent other than food waste. How- 4 ever, substantial toxicity was measured sanitary landfills is well documented, and in leachate from the food waste reac- there are about 119 landfill gas recovery tors. This toxicity was consistent with projects currently (January 1997) in op- the behavior of the reactors but could eration in the U.S. and Canada. While the not be simulated with high concentra- production of CH4 from landfills is well tions of carboxylic acids and sodium. established, there is large uncertainty in- The toxicity associated with food waste volved in estimating the amount and rate leachate is not likely to inhibit anaero- of CH4 production. This uncertainty is in- bic decomposition in U.S. landfills due creasing as the composition of the MSW buried changes due to increased recy- cling. Development of integrated solid waste mixed residential refuse was also charac- more extensive cellulose biodegradation management programs, which include re- terized. (MC decreasing) in the less lignified sub- cycling and in some cases, combustion, Tests were conducted in 2-L laboratory strates [(C+H)/Li increasing] e.g., food and have led to a decrease in the use of reactors in quadruplicate. Each refuse office paper (r2 = 0.28). However, the quan- landfills. However, there is a limit to the component was seeded with well-decom- titative relationship is weak because the types of waste that can be recycled, and posed refuse to initiate refuse-decomposi- office paper (C + H)/Li is well above any combustion has not been the solid waste tion. CH4 yield data have been corrected of the other components tested. The trend management alternative of choice for many for the background CH4 produced from towards increased cellulose loss with a communities. Thus, landfills will be a sig- the seed. In the case of food waste, two decreasing degree of lignification is most nificant part of MSW management for the sets of reactors were tested. In the first definite among the four paper components. foreseeable future. (F) series, there was insufficient seed, 30% There is not a linear relationship be- Both CH4 and carbon dioxide CO2 are by volume, and the reactors remained in- tween (C+H)/Li and the extent of decom- greenhouse gases that contribute to glo- hibited. A second set of food waste reac- position (r2 = 0.02). However, it is bal climate change. CH4 traps about 20 tors (SF) was then initiated with 70% seed interesting to note that grass, which is times more infrared energy than CO2 on a by volume, and these reactors produced highly lignified, underwent nearly complete volume basis. Consequently, although measurable CH4. decomposition as measured by either MC landfill gas contains approximately equal The test conditions were designed to or the extent of decomposition (Table 1). proportions of CH4 and CO2, CH4 is more measure the maximum CH4 production This suggests that the lignin concentra- significant with respect to atmospheric cli- potential of each component. This included tion does not always reflect the degree to ° mate change. Data on the amount of CH4 shredding, incubation at about 40 C, and which lignin inhibits cellulose bioavailabil- that can be expected from refuse already leachate recycle and neutralization. All re- ity. Apparently, the lignins in grass are not buried, as well as CH4 that will result from actors were monitored until they were no as restrictive to microorganisms as the the decomposition of refuse buried in the longer producing measurable CH4, except lignin in other components such as future, are needed to better assess the for the old corrugated container reactors branches. This result is consistent with a impact of landfills on global climate change. in which the CH4 yield increased by less report that stated, “. .the chemistry of The overall objective of this research than 2% over the final 80 days of monitor- grass lignocellulose varies considerably was to develop information on the anaero- ing. At the termination of the monitoring from that of wood.” bic decomposition of refuse that will im- period, reactors were destructively The solids decomposition (MC and MH) prove our ability to assess the impact of sampled for analysis of the residual sol- and CH4 yield data document the biode- sanitary landfills on global CH4 accumula- ids. gradability of even the most lignified sub- tion. Three sets of experiments were con- The CH4 yield, solids composition, and strates, leaves and branches, as well as ducted to meet this objective: (1) extent of cellulose and hemicellulose de- all other components of MSW tested. The measurement of the CH4 potential of the composition for each MSW component and absence of good linear relationships is major biodegradable components of MSW; mixed MSW are presented in Table 1. As likely because a number of factors influ- (2) assessment of whether leachate toxic- summarized in Table 1, there was sub- ence CH4 production and solids decompo- ity, associated with whole refuse or some stantial variation in the range of CH4 yields sition. The biodegradation of newsprint individual constituent, inhibits the onset or (30.6 to 300.7 mL/dry g) and the extent of measured here is in contrast to reports on rate of CH4 production; and (3) identifica- decomposition (28 to 94%) among the the excavation of readable newsprint that tion of solid waste constituents that carry components tested. In previous research had been buried in landfills decades ear- the anaerobic bacteria required for refuse with mixed refuse, carbohydrates ac- lier; however, these reported data did not methanogenesis. The results of each set counted for 91% of the stoichiometric CH4 represent average values, but rather ob- of experiments are summarized separately. potential of MSW. Carbohydrates were the servations during an archaeological exca- major organic compounds analyzed in the vation. The presence of readable newsprint Experiment 1: Measurement of waste components tested here, and the that had not undergone biodegradation the CH4 Potential of the Major relationship between carbohydrate concen- may be due to its isolation from other Biodegradable Components of tration and CH4 yield is presented in Fig- factors required for biodegradation such MSW ure 1. While the data in Figure 1 show a as bacteria, moisture, and nutrients. The The anaerobic biodegradability of the relationship, the relatively low correlation biodegradability of a newspaper buried in major biodegradable components of MSW coefficient (r2 = 0.49) and failure of the a bag that did not break during waste was characterized by measurement of their regression line to pass through zero, sug- compaction would differ from the biode- gest that factors in addition to carbohy- gradability of newsprint exposed to other CH4 yield and the biodegradation of cellu- lose and hemicellulose. The components drate concentration influence CH4 yield. refuse components. that were tested were grass, leaves, Lignin decreases carbohydrate bioavail- Based on the CH4 yields presented in branches, food waste, and four types of ability and is expected to confound the Table 1, a model was constructed to esti- paper—newsprint (ONP), old corrugated relationship presented in Figure 1. The mate CH4 yields based on assumed com- containers (OCC), office paper (OFF), and components with the lowest yields are the positions of buried refuse. These results coated paper (CP). These are the most two sets of seed reactors and leaves. are summarized in Table 2. The actual common types of paper in MSW and also These are also the components with the methane yield per wet kg of refuse buried represent the range of biodegradability that lowest carbohydrate to lignin [(C+H)/Li)] decreases by only 10% between the base could be expected from paper.
Recommended publications
  • Biodegradation of Bio-Sourced and Synthetic Organic Electronic Materials Towards Green Organic Electronics ✉ ✉ Eduardo Di Mauro1, Denis Rho2 & Clara Santato 1

    Biodegradation of Bio-Sourced and Synthetic Organic Electronic Materials Towards Green Organic Electronics ✉ ✉ Eduardo Di Mauro1, Denis Rho2 & Clara Santato 1

    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-23227-4 OPEN Biodegradation of bio-sourced and synthetic organic electronic materials towards green organic electronics ✉ ✉ Eduardo Di Mauro1, Denis Rho2 & Clara Santato 1 Ubiquitous use of electronic devices has led to an unprecedented increase in related waste as well as the worldwide depletion of reserves of key chemical elements required in their 1234567890():,; manufacturing. The use of biodegradable and abundant organic (carbon-based) electronic materials can contribute to alleviate the environmental impact of the electronic industry. The pigment eumelanin is a bio-sourced candidate for environmentally benign (green) organic electronics. The biodegradation of eumelanin extracted from cuttlefish ink is studied both at 25 °C (mesophilic conditions) and 58 °C (thermophilic conditions) following ASTM D5338 and comparatively evaluated with the biodegradation of two synthetic organic electronic materials, namely copper (II) phthalocyanine (Cu–Pc) and polyphenylene sulfide (PPS). Eumelanin biodegradation reaches 4.1% (25 °C) in 97 days and 37% (58 °C) in 98 days, and residual material is found to be without phytotoxic effects. The two synthetic materials, Cu–Pc and PPS, do not biodegrade; Cu–Pc brings about the inhibition of microbial respiration in the compost. PPS appears to be potentially phytotoxic. Finally, some considerations regarding the biodegradation test as well as the disambiguation of “biodegradability” and “bioresorbability” are highlighted. 1 Département de Génie Physique, Polytechnique Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada. 2 Aquatic and Crop Resource Development, National Research Council ✉ Canada, Montréal, QC, Canada. email: [email protected]; [email protected] NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | (2021) 12:3167 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-23227-4 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications 1 ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-23227-4 lectronic equipment has become ubiquitous in our everyday successfully diverts organic wastes from disposal in landfills10 and life.
  • Review on Bacterial Biodegradation of Municipal Solid Waste Management in India

    Review on Bacterial Biodegradation of Municipal Solid Waste Management in India

    ISSN(Online) : 2319-8753 ISSN (Print) : 2347-6710 International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology (An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization) Website: www.ijirset.com Vol. 6, Issue 1, January 2017 Review on Bacterial Biodegradation of Municipal Solid Waste Management in India Veeramani 1, Nirmal Kumar 1, and Kavitha 2 Ph.D Scholar, Department of Environmental and Herbal Science, Faculty of Science, Tamil University, Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu, India. 1 Assistant Professor, Department of Environmental and Herbal Science, Faculty of Science, Tamil University, Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu, India.2 ABSTRACT: Biodegradation is alternative way to manage or to degrade the Municipal Solid Waste Management (MSWM). It is eco-friendly and much cost effective is compared to other traditional technique such as incineration and composting. The main purpose of this paper is to pay more attention towards biodegradation of MSWM in Indian cities. Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) consist lots of waste such as household garbage and rubbish, street sweeping, agricultural waste, construction and demolition debris, sanitation residues, trade and non-hazardous industrial refuse and treated bio-medical solid waste. Review of this paper focused characteristics, collection, transportation, disposal and different microbial process of biodegradation, their limitation and the process to microbial different MSW dumping sites and these isolates could be vital sources for the microbial diversity is stated here and discussed. KEYWORDS: Municipal solid waste management, Bacteria, biodegradation I. INTRODUCTION Municipal Solid Waste Management (MSWM) has become a critical area of practice and research due to the increasing concern of environmental pollution and resources shortage Brewer, 2001. [4] Every day huge quantities of waste materials are generated in all cities and municipal areas of India.
  • Enhancing the Biodegradation of Waste Rubber a Novel Approach to Sustainable Management of Discarded Rubber Materials

    Enhancing the Biodegradation of Waste Rubber a Novel Approach to Sustainable Management of Discarded Rubber Materials

    INTERNATIONAL LATEX CONFERENCE 2015 Enhancing the Biodegradation of Waste Rubber A novel approach to sustainable management of discarded rubber materials Teresa Clark 8/12/2015 Rubber items are a critical part of modern society and a focus on the waste management of rubber is becoming more critical. Advancements have been made in recycling rubber waste, but a vast majority of rubber products are discarded into landfills. Sustainability efforts must include self-remediation through biodegradation of rubber (pre- consumer and post-consumer) in these waste sites. Current advancements provide insight into alternative methods of utilizing bio-mimicry to these return waste products to the natural carbon cycle, produce “green” energy and expand the scope of “Zero Waste”. Included are an assessment of the unique environment within landfills and the energy impact of utilizing these methods. Additionally, a brief update to the current progress in validating the biodegradation of rubber waste is included. Enhancing the Biodegradation of Waste Rubber International Latex Conference 2015 - Teresa Clark Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 2 Waste disposal of rubber materials .............................................................................................................. 2 Composting of Rubber .................................................................................................................................
  • Bio-Based and Biodegradable Plastics – Facts and Figures Focus on Food Packaging in the Netherlands

    Bio-Based and Biodegradable Plastics – Facts and Figures Focus on Food Packaging in the Netherlands

    Bio-based and biodegradable plastics – Facts and Figures Focus on food packaging in the Netherlands Martien van den Oever, Karin Molenveld, Maarten van der Zee, Harriëtte Bos Rapport nr. 1722 Bio-based and biodegradable plastics - Facts and Figures Focus on food packaging in the Netherlands Martien van den Oever, Karin Molenveld, Maarten van der Zee, Harriëtte Bos Report 1722 Colophon Title Bio-based and biodegradable plastics - Facts and Figures Author(s) Martien van den Oever, Karin Molenveld, Maarten van der Zee, Harriëtte Bos Number Wageningen Food & Biobased Research number 1722 ISBN-number 978-94-6343-121-7 DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.18174/408350 Date of publication April 2017 Version Concept Confidentiality No/yes+date of expiration OPD code OPD code Approved by Christiaan Bolck Review Intern Name reviewer Christaan Bolck Sponsor RVO.nl + Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs Client RVO.nl + Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs Wageningen Food & Biobased Research P.O. Box 17 NL-6700 AA Wageningen Tel: +31 (0)317 480 084 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: www.wur.nl/foodandbiobased-research © Wageningen Food & Biobased Research, institute within the legal entity Stichting Wageningen Research All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system of any nature, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. The publisher does not accept any liability for inaccuracies in this report. 2 © Wageningen Food & Biobased Research, institute within the legal entity Stichting Wageningen Research Preface For over 25 years Wageningen Food & Biobased Research (WFBR) is involved in research and development of bio-based materials and products.
  • Claims on Biodegradability and Compostability on Products and Packaging

    Claims on Biodegradability and Compostability on Products and Packaging

    EuropeanEuropean Bioplastics Bioplastics e.V. Marienstr. e.V. Marienstr. 19/20 19/20 10117 Berlin 10117 Berlin EuropeanEuropean Bioplastics Bioplastics e.V. e.V. European Bioplastics e.V. Marienstr. 19/20 10117 Berlin European Bioplastics e.V. Marienstr.Marienstr. 19/20, 19/20, 10117 10117 Berlin Berlin phone phone+49.30.28+49.30.28 48 23 48 50 23 50 fax fax+49.30.28Marienstr.+49.30.28 48 19/20,23 48 59 23 1011759 Berlin [email protected][email protected] 48 23 50 webfax webwww.european-bioplastics.org+49.30.28www.european-bioplastics.org 48 23 59 e-mail [email protected] web www.european-bioplastics.org European Bioplastics CLAIMS ON BIODEGRADABILITY AND COMPOSTABILITY ON PRODUCTS AND PACKAGING Claims about biodegradability and compostability are wide- vironmental conditions, the rate of biodegradation can vary ly used to label products and packaging regarding their end- for different products or materials. Thus, for example, fruit of-life. Biodegradation can take place in different systems pulp will biodegrade faster than fruit peelings or wood. (industrial or home composting) and environments (soil, Claiming biodegradability water). In general, the sole claim “biodegradable” on products and What is biodegradability? packaging, without indicating specific standards or environ- Biodegradability is the potential of a material to follow the ments in which the biodegradation takes place, is mislead- process of biodegradation. Biodegradation1 is a biochemi- ing and therefore should not be used.4 Biodegradability cal process during which microorganisms that are present claims must be transparent and verifiable and supported in the environment convert biodegradable materials into by standards that define the scope, i.e.
  • Back Ground Apr 2015

    Back Ground Apr 2015

    BACK European Bioplastics e.V. Marienstr. 19/20 10117 Berlin European Bioplastics e.V. GROUND Marienstr. 19/20, 10117 Berlin phone +49.30.28 48 23 50 APRfax +49.30.28 201548 23 59 e-mail [email protected] web www.european-bioplastics.org EN 13432 CERTIFIED BIOPLASTICS PERFORMANCE IN INDUSTRIAL COMPOSTING VR 19997 Nz, Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, USt-IdNr. DE235874231 HypoVereinsbank Rosenheim, BLZ 711 200 77, Konto 6356800, IBAN DE26 7112 0077 0006 3568 00, BIC/SWIFT HYVEDEMM448 BACK GROUND APR 2015 European Bioplastics e.V. Marienstr. 19/20 10117 Berlin European Bioplastics e.V. Marienstr. 19/20, 10117 Berlin 1. INTRODUCTION phone +49.30.28 48 23 50 fax +49.30.28 48 23 59 The Directive on Packaging and Packaging Waste (PPWD) was first issued e-mail [email protected] in 1994. Its main purpose was to increase the recovery rate of packaging web www.european-bioplastics.org waste and to cut disposal (landfilling). Apart from mechanical recycling ORGANIC WASTE also biological (organic) recycling1 was defined, and a specific standard for identifying "packaging recoverable by means of biodegradation and - from households and industry composting" was requested from CEN. The standard prepared under the EC - seperately collected Mandate M2002 was finalised in 2000 at the same time as other standards on reuse, mechanical recycling and energy recovery. However, it was the only one to be immediately accepted by the EC as a harmonised standard3, while another round of standardisation work was required for the others. The EN 13432 standard “Packaging - Requirements for packaging recove- rable through composting and biodegradation - Test scheme and evaluation WASTE COLLECTION criteria for the final acceptance of packaging” specifies requirements and procedures to determine the compostability and anaerobic treatability of packaging and packaging materials.
  • Biodegradation Won't Solve the Landfill Crunch

    Biodegradation Won't Solve the Landfill Crunch

    Biodegradation Won’t Solve the Landfill Crunch What happens deep below the surface of a landfill? ` Modern sanitary landfills are managed so that little What doesn’t happen would be a more accurate description. More than two thirds of the material actually garbage going into landfills may be theoretically “degradable”, but little change actually degrades. occurs once it gets there. ` Landfill excavations have “Here today, gone tomorrow – that’s what many people believe biodegradability really means. uncovered newspapers that are still readable Bury newspapers, wood or food scraps and they’ll disappear over time through decomposition. after almost 40 years, ten year-old carrots that are “Not so,” says Dr. William Rathje, an archaeologist at the University of Arizona who believes brown on the outside and biodegradability is North America’s favourite myth next to Santa Claus. bright orange on the inside, and 20 year-old “Nothing has as popular an image as biodegradability in landfills. Unfortunately, though, it steaks with meat still on simply doesn’t happen.” the bones. Scientific research has demonstrated that very little biodegrades in modern sanitary landfills. ` As people become better informed about solid The Buried Evidence waste issues, the focus of attention will shift away Excavations of landfill sites across North America have uncovered some startling facts: from the degradability newspapers are still readable after almost 40 years; ten year-old carrots are brown on the outside myth and toward real but bright orange on the inside; and 20 year-old steaks still have meat on the bones. solutions such as source reduction, reuse, While some food debris and yard waste may degrade at a very slow rate – perhaps about 25 per recycling, composting and cent in the first 15 years – there may be little or no additional change for at least another 40 recovery of energy – years.
  • Biodegradation and Landfill Settlement

    Biodegradation and Landfill Settlement

    New Jersey Institute of Technology Digital Commons @ NJIT Theses Electronic Theses and Dissertations Fall 10-31-1996 Biodegradation and landfill settlement Shailesh Pisolkar New Jersey Institute of Technology Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.njit.edu/theses Part of the Environmental Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Pisolkar, Shailesh, "Biodegradation and landfill settlement" (1996). Theses. 1061. https://digitalcommons.njit.edu/theses/1061 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Electronic Theses and Dissertations at Digital Commons @ NJIT. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ NJIT. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Copyright Warning & Restrictions The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a, user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of “fair use” that user may be liable for copyright infringement, This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law. Please Note: The author retains the copyright while the New Jersey Institute of Technology reserves the right to distribute this thesis or dissertation Printing note: If you do not wish to print this page, then select “Pages from: first page # to: last page #” on the print dialog screen The Van Houten library has removed some of the personal information and all signatures from the approval page and biographical sketches of theses and dissertations in order to protect the identity of NJIT graduates and faculty.
  • Microbial Population Dynamics and Diversity in Municipal Solid Waste Anaerobic Laboratory Reactors

    Microbial Population Dynamics and Diversity in Municipal Solid Waste Anaerobic Laboratory Reactors

    MICROBIAL POPULATION DYNAMICS AND DIVERSITY IN MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE ANAEROBIC LABORATORY REACTORS PROJECT REPORT by Christopher A. Bareither Dept. of Geological Engineering University of Wisconsin-Madison Steven J. Fong Dept. of Bacteriology University of Wisconsin-Madison Georgia L. Wolfe Dept. of Bacteriology University of Wisconsin-Madison Katherine D. McMahon Depts. of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Bacteriology Submitted to The University of Wisconsin System Solid Waste Research Program August 5, 2009 ABSTRACT This study is directed towards developing relationships between physical and environmental characteristics of bioreactor landfills, microbial community composition, and methanogen populations. Anaerobic reactors degrading municipal solid waste are operated with temperature control and leachate recirculation to optimize biodegradation. Leachate samples are collected weekly and analyzed for pH, electrical conductivity, oxidation-reduction potential, and chemical oxygen demand. Biogas produced during biodegradation is measured volumetrically and composition is assessed for H 2, N 2, O 2, CO 2 and CH 4. Microbial community composition is assessed using automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis and methanogen populations are assessed using quantitative polymerase chain reaction. The reactors have been in operation for approximately 160 d and all exhibit typical leachate chemistry trends of anaerobic degradation. Coupled with the methane production, the reactors have progressed through the acid phase and accelerated
  • Biodegradable Waste to Biogas: Renewable Energy Option for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

    Biodegradable Waste to Biogas: Renewable Energy Option for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Directory of Open Access Journals International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies ISSN 2028-9324 Vol. 4 No. 1 Sep. 2013, pp. 101-113 © 2013 Innovative Space of Scientific Research Journals http://www.issr-journals.org/ijias/ Biodegradable waste to biogas: Renewable energy option for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Muhammad Sadiq Munfath Khan1 and Zakariya Kaneesamkandi2 1Sustainable Energy Technology (SET) Department, College of Engineering, King Saud University, PO Box 800, Riyadh, 11421, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia 2Mechanical Engineering Department College of Engineering, King Saud University, PO Box 800, Riyadh, 11421, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Copyright © 2013 ISSR Journals. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. ABSTRACT: Energy recovery from waste is not a new field of study, but its implementation continues to be a challenge in some Arab countries. Although there is abundance of useful waste in the urban markets, practices aiming at waste to energy conversion are still negligible. In the kingdom of Saudi Arabia, so-called green markets are abundant with renewable energy potential, but the practical implementation of this potential is missing. Therefore the objective of this paper is the evaluation of waste generation in KSA for the energy recovery purpose, and to show that the conversion of green waste into biofuel is not only environmentally friendly but also financially rewarding. Since the result illustrate that the major portion of the waste generated is organic waste, anaerobic digestion is proposed waste to energy technology because of its feasibility for biodegradation of moist organic wastes into biogas.
  • Report on Improving the Biodegradability Requirements In

    Report on Improving the Biodegradability Requirements In

    Options to improve the biodegradability requirements in the Packaging Directive FINAL REPORT DG Environment – European Commission February 2012 Project description CLIENT: DG Environment – European Commission CONTRACT NUMBER: ENV.G.4/FRA/2008/0112 REPORT TITLE: Final Report Options to improve the biodegradability requirements PROJECT NAME: in the Packaging Directive DATE: February 2012 AUTHORS: Mr. Shailendra Mudgal Mr. Kurt Muehmel Mr. Eric Hoa Ms. Marine Grémont Mr. Eric Labouze KEY CONTACTS: Shailendra Mudgal + 33 (0) 1 53 90 11 80 [email protected] or Kurt Muehmel + 33 (0) 1 53 90 11 80 Kurt.muehmel @biois.com DISCLAIMER: The project team does not accept any liability for any direct or indirect damage resulting from the use of this report or its content. The views expressed in this report are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Commission. The recommendations given by the authors should not be interpreted as a political or legal signal that the Commission intends to take a given action. Please cite this publication as: BIO Intelligence Service (2012), Options to improve the biodegradability requirements in the Packaging Directive, Final report. Prepared for DG Environment – European Commission Photo credit: cover @ Per Ola Wiberg 2 | Options to improve the biodegradability requirements in the Packaging Directive Acknowledgements The authors of the study would like to thank the following groups for their invaluable support. Industry associations EU – Plastics Europe, Guy Castelan
  • Naturally Occurring Biodegradation As a Remedial Action Option for Soil Contamination

    Naturally Occurring Biodegradation As a Remedial Action Option for Soil Contamination

    Naturally Occurring Biodegradation as a Remedial Action Option for Soil Contamination Interim Guidance (Revised) PUBL-SW-515-95 Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Bureau for Remediation and Redevelopment Madison, WI 53707 August, 1994 Updated Disclaimers September, 2004 Contents INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................... 1 BACKGROUND......................................................................................................... 1 Situations where naturally occurring biodegradation may be appropriate ............................ 1 The biodegradation process .................................................................................. 2 SITE CHARACTERIZATION........................................................................................ 4 Contaminant Characterization ............................................................................... 4 Contaminants present and their concentrations.................................................. 4 Biodegradability...................................................................................... 4 Environmental Parameters ................................................................................... 5 Soil moisture.......................................................................................... 6 Permeability .......................................................................................... 6 Soil temperature.....................................................................................