Decision Making for Scotland

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Modern Studies - S3 Decision Making for Scotland S3 Modern Studies Decision Making for Scotland After completing this unit pupils should be able to: Level 3 (most pupils): - Better interpret evidence and give an informed view - Understand the rights and responsibilities of citizens in Scotland - Understand the arrangements for political decision making in Scotland Level 4 (some pupils) - Evaluate conflicting sources of evidence to sustain a line of argument - Assess the importance of different individuals or groups in bringing about a significant political change - Evaluate the role of the media in Scotland and assess its importance in informing and influencing citizens and decision makers - Assess the impact of the Scottish Parliament on the lives of the people of Scotland - Explain why some people participate in the democratic process and why others do not - Explain reasons why some individuals and groups seek to achieve their aims by non-democratic means Lesson 1 - Learning Intentions (Pupils should be able to): 1 Modern Studies - S3 Decision Making for Scotland 1. Describe the rights of citizens in Scotland. Human Rights Everyone no matter where they live in the world has the same human rights. In 1948 the United Nations drew up a document called the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights Everyone has the right to: Life Vote Freedom of religion A fair trial Freedom of speech Peaceful assembly Education Freedom of movement Join a trade union An adequate standard of living Heading: Human Rights 1. Which organisation drew up the Universal Declaration of Human Rights? 2. “The Universal Declaration of Human Rights is only for adults.” Mr Black What information is there in the passage to oppose Mr Black? 3. Make two headings in your jotter. List the following under ‘Rights’ and ‘Not Rights’. Write to newspapers Freedom of speech Demonstrate violently Shout down people you do not agree with Join a political party Complain to an MP/MSP Stand for election Stop the traffic Put political posters in your window Say anything you like on social media 4. Which two human rights do you consider to be most important? Explain each of your answers. 5. Complete a drawing in your jotter to show one human right. Extension: Video - Ask your teacher to let you see the Ch4 video: ‘Human Rights’ Lesson 2 - Learning Intentions (Pupils should be able to): 2 Modern Studies - S3 Decision Making for Scotland 1. Describe the responsibilities of citizens in Scotland. Rights and Responsibilities Everyone in entitled to human rights. However, with right there comes responsibilities. For example, if children have the right to an education, they also have the responsibility to come to school on time and to follow school rules. In the same way, if people have the right to march and demonstrate they must do this within the law. Heading: Rights and Responsibilities 1. Which of the pictures below show rights and which responsibilities? a) Making a speech b) No violence c) Attending school d) To demonstrate 2. Read the statements below then answer the questions which follow. Voting, what’s the point? My vote Voting is a responsibility. Everyone won’t change anything. It’s a waste of should vote. It’s our chance to have time. My MP is meant to represent me our say in who runs the country. If but I never agree with anything she people did not use their right to vote says. I’ve never voted and never will. there would be no government and the Politicians just do what they want. country would fall apart. I always Kasey Butler vote. Sian Gilmore a) Explain one difference between Kasey and Sian when it comes to voting. b) Sian states that ‘voting is a responsibility’. What does she mean by this? c) Which of the two views do you agree with most? Give a reason for your answer. d) If people don’t vote, should they lose their right to criticise their MP or the government? Give a reason for your answer. 3. In Australia it is against the law not to vote. People can be fined if they don’t bother voting. Do you agree with this? Give a reason for your answer. 3 Modern Studies - S3 Decision Making for Scotland 4. Read the statement below then answer the question which follows. Voting is an important right. When voting people elect their representatives such as MPs but they also elect a government. Voting will always get you the representative you want. Megan Cownie Copy out the sentence from what is said by Megan which is exaggerated. Give a reason for your choice. 5. Some voters in elections deliberately spoil their ballot paper (see example right). Can you think of one reason why they may do this? 6. Complete a drawing in your jotter to encourage people to vote in elections. Extension: Collect a copy of “Democracy in Scotland and the UK”. Read pages 4 and 5. Complete Q1 and Q2 page 5. Further Learning: Groupwork In groups, brainstorm to complete a spider diagram to show the responsibilities of adults in Scotland e.g. If parents, adults have the responsibility to send their children to school. 4 Modern Studies - S3 Decision Making for Scotland Lesson 3 - Learning Intentions (Pupils should be able to): 1. Better understand the arrangements for political decision making in Scotland. Representation for Scotland The United Kingdom (UK) is a democracy. A democracy is a country where the people choose their government. In the UK there are too many people to ask and too many decisions to take therefore representatives are elected to make decisions. Representatives include Members of Parliament (MPs), Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs) and local councillors. For the UK Parliament in Westminster, London, MPs are elected every five years at a General Election. For the purposes of the General Election, the country is divided into 650 constituencies or areas. Each constituency elects one MP to Parliament. The last General Election was in 2015. For the Scottish Parliament at Holyrood, Edinburgh, MSPs are also elected every five years. For the purposes of this election, Scotland is divided into 73 constituencies. Each constituency elects one MSP but there are also an additional 56 regional or list MSPs making 129 MSPs in total. The last election to the Scottish Parliament was in 2016. The next Scottish Parliament election is in 2016. Note: If an MP or MSP dies or resigns a by-election is held to elect a new representative. Wordbox: Democracy – A country where people choose the government. Representatives – People who act and speak on behalf of others. Government – Those elected to take decisions and run the country. Election / By-election – A vote to choose a representative. Constituency – The area an MP/MSP represents. Heading: Representation for Scotland 1. Copy the wordbox above into your jotter. 2. In the United Kingdom everyone should meet together to make decisions. 5 Modern Studies - S3 Decision Making for Scotland Using only the information on page 5 paragraph 1, do you agree or disagree with this view? Give two reasons for your answer. 3. i) What number of MPs are there in the UK? ii) What number of MSPs are there in total in Scotland? 4. Read the statement in the box below then answer the question which follows. Elections in the UK are held every four or five years. The UK is a democracy. If your MP or MSP dies or resigns you lose you representative until the next election. Parliament is the place where MPs/MSPs meet to make decisions. From the statement in the box above, choose one sentence that is exaggerated. Copy the sentence into your jotter and give one reason for your choice. 5. i) When will the next General Election be held? ii) When will the next Scottish Parliament election be held? 6. Study the views below then answer the question which follows. UK Democracy Works Well UK Democracy Needs Improved There is no need to change what is an There needs to be radical change to effective decision making system. the way in which democracy works in Having elections every five years Scotland and the UK. To begin with, gives government enough time to elections are too far apart at once improve the country before the every five years. Elections should be people decide if they should remain. held around every two years. Next There is a good balance of powers more decisions should be taken for between the Scottish and UK Scotland in the Scottish Parliament. parliaments. This gives Scotland the This would improve life in Scotland. best decisions from two parliaments. Finally, more use should be made of Finally, referenda are not the best referenda or single issue votes. This way in which to make decisions as would give people more say in the way many voters may make their mind up in which their country is run. without knowing the full facts. Mrs Cathro Mr Laird Mr Laird and Mrs Cathro have different views on the way democracy works in Scotland and the UK. What are two of these differences? Use only the information in the table above. Extension – Ask you teacher to show you the following clip of video: Democracy? You Decide 6 Modern Studies - S3 Decision Making for Scotland Further Learning: Collect a copy of “Democracy in Scotland and the UK”. Read pages 5-7. Complete Q1 and Q2 page 9. Lesson 4 - Learning Intentions (Pupils should be able to): 1. Explain who can / cannot stand as a candidate in Scottish / UK elections. 2. Explain who can / cannot vote in Scottish and UK elections.
Recommended publications
  • Stewart2019.Pdf

    Stewart2019.Pdf

    Political Change and Scottish Nationalism in Dundee 1973-2012 Thomas A W Stewart PhD Thesis University of Edinburgh 2019 Abstract Prior to the 2014 independence referendum, the Scottish National Party’s strongest bastions of support were in rural areas. The sole exception was Dundee, where it has consistently enjoyed levels of support well ahead of the national average, first replacing the Conservatives as the city’s second party in the 1970s before overcoming Labour to become its leading force in the 2000s. Through this period it achieved Westminster representation between 1974 and 1987, and again since 2005, and had won both of its Scottish Parliamentary seats by 2007. This performance has been completely unmatched in any of the country’s other cities. Using a mixture of archival research, oral history interviews, the local press and memoires, this thesis seeks to explain the party’s record of success in Dundee. It will assess the extent to which the character of the city itself, its economy, demography, geography, history, and local media landscape, made Dundee especially prone to Nationalist politics. It will then address the more fundamental importance of the interaction of local political forces that were independent of the city’s nature through an examination of the ability of party machines, key individuals and political strategies to shape the city’s electoral landscape. The local SNP and its main rival throughout the period, the Labour Party, will be analysed in particular detail. The thesis will also take time to delve into the histories of the Conservatives, Liberals and Radical Left within the city and their influence on the fortunes of the SNP.
  • Health and Sport Committee

    Health and Sport Committee

    HEALTH AND SPORT COMMITTEE Wednesday 11 November 2009 Session 3 £5.00 Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body 2009. Applications for reproduction should be made in writing to the Information Policy Team, Office of the Queen‟s Printer for Scotland, Admail ADM4058, Edinburgh, EH1 1NG, or by email to: [email protected]. OQPS administers the copyright on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. Printed and published in Scotland on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body by RR Donnelley. CONTENTS Wednesday 11 November 2009 Col. DECISION ON TAKING BUSINESS IN PRIVATE ............................................................................................ 2365 TOBACCO AND PRIMARY MEDICAL SERVICES (SCOTLAND) BILL: STAGE 2 ................................................... 2366 HEALTH AND SPORT COMMITTEE 29th Meeting 2009, Session 3 CONVENER *Christine Grahame (South of Scotland) (SNP) DEPU TY CONVENER *Ross Finnie (West of Scotland) (LD) COMMI TTEE MEMBERS *Helen Eadie (Dunfermline East) (Lab) *Rhoda Grant (Highlands and Islands) (Lab) *Michael Matheson (Falkirk West) (SNP) *Ian Mc Kee (Lothians) (SNP) *Mary Scanlon (Highlands and Islands) (Con) *Dr Richard Simpson (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Lab) COMMI TTEE SUBSTITU TES Joe Fitz Patrick (Dundee West) (SNP) Mr Frank McAveety (Glasgow Shettleston) (Lab) Jamie McGrigor (Highlands and Islands) (Con) Jamie Stone (Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross) (LD) *attended THE FOLLOWING ALSO ATTENDED : Kenneth Gibson (Cunninghame North) (SNP) Shona Robison (Minister for Public Health and Sport) CLERK TO THE COMMITTE E Callum Thomson SENIOR ASSISTANT CLERK Douglas Thornton ASSISTANT CLERK Seán Wixted LOC ATION Committee Room 3 2365 11 NOVEMBER 2009 2366 Scottish Parliament Tobacco and Primary Medical Services (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2 Health and Sport Committee Wednesday 11 November 2009 10:17 The Convener: This is day 1 of stage 2 [THE CONVENER opened the meeting in private at consideration of amendments to the Tobacco and 09:31] Primary Medical Services (Scotland) Bill.
  • House of Commons

    House of Commons

    UNCORRECTED TRANSCRIPT OF ORAL EVIDENCE To be published as HC 140-xiii HOUSE OF COMMONS ORAL EVIDENCE TAKEN BEFORE THE SCOTTISH AFFAIRS COMMITTEE THE REFERENDUM ON SEPARATION FOR SCOTLAND WEDNESDAY 15 JANUARY 2014 PROFESSOR IAIN McLEAN, PROFESSOR ADAM TOMKINS and PROFESSOR KENNETH ARMSTRONG Evidence heard in Public Questions 4107 - 4258 USE OF THE TRANSCRIPT 1. This is an uncorrected transcript of evidence taken in public and reported to the House. The transcript has been placed on the internet on the authority of the Committee, and copies have been made available by the Vote Office for the use of Members and others. 2. Any public use of, or reference to, the contents should make clear that neither witnesses nor Members have had the opportunity to correct the record. The transcript is not yet an approved formal record of these proceedings. 3. Members who receive this for the purpose of correcting questions addressed by them to witnesses are asked to send corrections to the Committee Assistant. 4. Prospective witnesses may receive this in preparation for any written or oral evidence they may in due course give to the Committee. 1 Oral Evidence Taken before the Scottish Affairs Committee on Wednesday 15 January 2014 Members present: Mr Ian Davidson (Chair) Mike Crockart Graeme Morrice Pamela Nash Sir James Paice Mr Alan Reid Lindsay Roy ________________ Examination of Witnesses Witnesses: Professor Iain McLean, Professor of Politics, Official Fellow, Nuffield College, University of Oxford, Professor Adam Tomkins, John Millar Chair of Public Law, University of Glasgow, and Professor Kenneth Armstrong, Professor of European Law, University of Cambridge, gave evidence.
  • MINUTES of PROCEEDINGS Parliamentary Year 3, No. 3, Session

    MINUTES of PROCEEDINGS Parliamentary Year 3, No. 3, Session

    MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS Parliamentary Year 3, No. 3, Session 5 Meeting of the Parliament Thursday 17 May 2018 Note: (DT) signifies a decision taken at Decision Time. The meeting opened at 11.40 am. 1. General Questions: Questions were answered by Cabinet Secretaries and Ministers. 2. First Minister’s Questions: Questions were answered by the First Minister (Nicola Sturgeon). 3. The Everyone’s Business Campaign: The Parliament debated S5M-10464 in the name of Clare Haughey—That the Parliament welcomes the introduction to Scotland of the campaign, Everyone’s Business; notes that this campaign calls for all women who experience perinatal mental health problems to receive the care that they and their families need; understands that more than 1 in 10 women develop a mental illness during pregnancy or within the first year after having a child, and these illnesses include antenatal depression, postnatal depression, anxiety, perinatal obsessive compulsive disorder, postpartum psychosis and post-traumatic stress disorder; believes that such mental illness often goes unrecognised, undiagnosed and untreated and that this can have a devastating impact on the women and their families; understands that the availability of specialist provision is varied, meaning that specific care may not be readily available across the whole of the UK; welcomes the Scottish Government’s Mental Health Strategy 2017-2027, which includes a commitment to fund the introduction of a managed clinical network that will aim to bring together health professionals in order to improve recognition and treatment in Rutherglen and across Scotland, and notes the campaign’s aim, which is to ensure that all women who experience such problems receive appropriate care, wherever and whenever they need it.
  • 17 September 2018 by Email Only Strictly Private and Confidential The

    17 September 2018 by Email Only Strictly Private and Confidential The

    17 September 2018 By email only Strictly Private and Confidential The Scottish Ministers St Andrew's House Regent Road Edinburgh EH13DG FAO [redact - personal information], Scottish Government [redact - personal information] Dear Sir The Scottish Professional Football League Limited (the "SPFL") Unacceptable Conduct at SPFL Matches where a Match Delegate is present ("Relevant Matches") I refer to my letter dated 9 April 2018 which enclosed informationon instances of Unacceptable Conduct at Relevant Matches for the period from 14 July 2017 to 3 February 2018 inclusive. I am now pleased to enclose a report for the full 201 7 /18 Season, together with details of the traffic light reporting system employed, a summary of the key points and some further information which I hope you will find useful. It is important to note that the reports only cover matches played under the auspices of the SPFL at which an SPFL Match Delegate was present. Match Delegates are appointed to all Ladbrokes Premiership matches and certain other selected matches of particular interest. The reports clearly highlight that 'significant and material' "Unacceptable Conduct" only occurs at a minority of such matches. In addition, the SPFL does not expect, or have reason to suspect, that "Unacceptable Conduct" regularly occurs at SPFL matches not attended by a Match Delegate - such matches constituting the majority of professional football matches played in Scotland each week. The information included in or attached to this communication is confidential and is not publicly available or accessible. Disclosure of such information would cause substantial harm to the interests of the SPFL and I or its shareholders.
  • Revue Française De Civilisation Britannique, XX-2 | 2015 Bottom-Up Versus Top-Down Campaigning at the Scottish Independence Referendum

    Revue Française De Civilisation Britannique, XX-2 | 2015 Bottom-Up Versus Top-Down Campaigning at the Scottish Independence Referendum

    Revue Française de Civilisation Britannique French Journal of British Studies XX-2 | 2015 Le référendum sur l’indépendance écossaise du 18 septembre 2014 Bottom-up versus Top-down Campaigning at the Scottish Independence Referendum 2014 La campagne du référendum écossais de 2014: la campagne officielle et la campagne de terrain Peter Lynch Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/rfcb/405 DOI: 10.4000/rfcb.405 ISSN: 2429-4373 Publisher CRECIB - Centre de recherche et d'études en civilisation britannique Electronic reference Peter Lynch, « Bottom-up versus Top-down Campaigning at the Scottish Independence Referendum 2014 », Revue Française de Civilisation Britannique [Online], XX-2 | 2015, Online since 23 July 2015, connection on 02 May 2019. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/rfcb/405 ; DOI : 10.4000/rfcb.405 This text was automatically generated on 2 May 2019. Revue française de civilisation britannique est mis à disposition selon les termes de la licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International. Bottom-up versus Top-down Campaigning at the Scottish Independence Referendum... 1 Bottom-up versus Top-down Campaigning at the Scottish Independence Referendum 2014 La campagne du référendum écossais de 2014: la campagne officielle et la campagne de terrain Peter Lynch 1 The proposal to use the referendum device to achieve a mandate for Scottish independence had been the policy of the Scottish National Party since devolution was instituted in 1999. In office after 2007, the party had floated the idea of a two-step referendum on enhanced devolution and independence but its success at the 2011 Scottish election gave it the majority and the mandate required to press for a one- question referendum on independence.
  • Official Report of This Meeting

    Official Report of This Meeting

    COVID-19 Committee Wednesday 17 June 2020 Session 5 © Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body Information on the Scottish Parliament’s copyright policy can be found on the website - www.parliament.scot or by contacting Public Information on 0131 348 5000 Wednesday 17 June 2020 CONTENTS Col. EASING LOCKDOWN RESTRICTIONS .................................................................................................................... 1 COVID-19 COMMITTEE 10th Meeting 2020, Session 5 CONVENER *Murdo Fraser (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Con) DEPUTY CONVENER *Monica Lennon (Central Scotland) (Lab) COMMITTEE MEMBERS *Willie Coffey (Kilmarnock and Irvine Valley) (SNP) *Annabelle Ewing (Cowdenbeath) (SNP) *Ross Greer (West Scotland) (Green) Shona Robison (Dundee City East) (SNP) *Stewart Stevenson (Banffshire and Buchan Coast) (SNP) *Adam Tomkins (Glasgow) (Con) *Beatrice Wishart (Shetland Islands) (LD) *attended THE FOLLOWING ALSO PARTICIPATED: David Lonsdale (Scottish Retail Consortium) Donna Manson (Highland Council) Gillian Martin (Aberdeenshire East) (SNP) (Committee Substitute) Helen Martin (Scottish Trades Union Congress) Nick Sharpe (Scottish Renewables) Clare Slipper (NFU Scotland) CLERK TO THE COMMITTEE Jane Williams LOCATION Virtual Meeting 1 17 JUNE 2020 2 up the humanitarian assessment centres. Councils Scottish Parliament were given a few days’ notice that a decision was coming, so we were able to work closely together. COVID-19 Committee Lots of structures have been set up to do that. However, some decisions have been made Wednesday 17 June 2020 overnight, which has put councils in a very challenging position. [The Convener opened the meeting at 09:00] On the announcement that has been made in recent days, Highland Council is very lucky. We Easing Lockdown Restrictions have for a number of years had a system that uses Chromebooks for our young people.
  • Referendum (Scotland) Bill Committee

    Referendum (Scotland) Bill Committee

    REFERENDUM (SCOTLAND) BILL COMMITTEE Thursday 30 May 2013 Session 4 © Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body Information on the Scottish Parliament’s copyright policy can be found on the website - www.scottish.parliament.uk or by contacting Public Information on 0131 348 5000 Thursday 30 May 2013 CONTENTS Col. SCOTTISH INDEPENDENCE REFERENDUM BILL: STAGE 1 ................................................................................. 465 REFERENDUM (SCOTLAND) BILL COMMITTEE 15th Meeting 2013, Session 4 CONVENER *Bruce Crawford (Stirling) (SNP) DEPUTY CONVENER *James Kelly (Rutherglen) (Lab) COMMITTEE MEMBERS *Annabelle Ewing (Mid Scotland and Fife) (SNP) Linda Fabiani (East Kilbride) (SNP) *Patricia Ferguson (Glasgow Maryhill and Springburn) (Lab) *Rob Gibson (Caithness, Sutherland and Ross) (SNP) *Annabel Goldie (West Scotland) (Con) *Patrick Harvie (Glasgow) (Green) *Stewart Maxwell (West Scotland) (SNP) *Stuart McMillan (West Scotland) (SNP) *Tavish Scott (Shetland Islands) (LD) *attended THE FOLLOWING ALSO PARTICIPATED: Colin Borland (Federation of Small Businesses) Dennis Canavan (Yes Scotland) John Downie (Scottish Council for Voluntary Organisations) Craig Harrow (Better Together) Blair Jenkins (Yes Scotland) Bill Kidd (Glasgow Anniesland) (SNP) (Committee Substitute) Blair McDougall (Better Together) Professor Aileen McHarg (University of Strathclyde) Euan Page (Equality and Human Rights Commission) Bill Scott (Inclusion Scotland) Kyle Thornton (Scottish Youth Parliament) CLERK TO THE COMMITTEE Andrew Mylne LOCATION Committee Room 1 465 30 MAY 2013 466 process. I hand over to Dennis Canavan for his Scottish Parliament remarks. Referendum (Scotland) Bill Dennis Canavan (Yes Scotland): Convener, thank you for inviting us. I chair the advisory board Committee of Yes Scotland, which consists of about a dozen members from various backgrounds such as Thursday 30 May 2013 politics, the business community, media and entertainment.
  • CONDUCT of MEMBERS of the SCOTTISH PARLIAMENT Report by the Scottish Parliamentary Standards Commissioner to the Scottish Parl

    CONDUCT of MEMBERS of the SCOTTISH PARLIAMENT Report by the Scottish Parliamentary Standards Commissioner to the Scottish Parl

    ANNEXE A: REPORT FROM THE SCOTTISH PARLIAMENTARY STANDARDS COMMISSIONER AND ASSOCIATED ANNEXES CONDUCT of MEMBERS of the SCOTTISH PARLIAMENT Report by the Scottish Parliamentary Standards Commissioner to the Scottish Parliament on complaint no. 10C/09 Complainer :- Mr Ian Gemmell Respondent :- Kenneth James Gibson MSP 28 September 2010 Commissioner: D. Stuart Allan 44 Drumsheugh Gardens Edinburgh EH3 7SW Direct Tel: 0300 011 0550 E-mail: [email protected] CONDUCT of MEMBERS of the SCOTTISH PARLIAMENT Report on complaint no. 10C/09 to the Scottish Parliament Complainer :- Mr Ian Gemmell Respondent :- Kenneth James Gibson MSP 1.0 Introduction 1.1 The Code of Conduct for Members of the Scottish Parliament (“the Code”) has been approved by the Scottish Parliament under its Standing Orders to provide a set of principles and standards for its Members. 1.2 Other relevant provisions relating to the conduct of MSPs include the Interests of Members of the Scottish Parliament Act 2006 (“the 2006 Act”)1 and the Parliament’s standing orders. 1.3 For the purpose of this complaint, the relevant editions of the Code are editions 3 and 4 which were approved by the Parliament in May 2007 and in March 2009 respectively2. 1.4 The regulation of the Code and of the other relevant provisions relating to conduct is undertaken in terms of the Scottish Parliamentary Standards Commissioner Act 2002 (“the 2002 Act”)3. 1.5 This Report is submitted to the Parliament in terms of section 9 of the 2002 Act. 1 http://www.opsi.gov.uk/legislation/scotland/acts2006/asp_20060012_en_1 2 http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/msp/conduct/index.htm (edition 4 of the Code) 3 http://www.opsi.gov.uk/legislation/Scotland/acts2002/asp_20020016_en_1 - 2 - 2.0 Complaint 2.1 The complainer (“the complainer”) is Mr Ian Gemmell and his complaint is about Mr Kenneth J Gibson, MSP (“the respondent”).
  • 2021 MSP Spreadsheet

    2021 MSP Spreadsheet

    Constituency MSP Name Party Email Airdrie and Shotts Neil Gray SNP [email protected] Coatbridge and Chryston Fulton MacGregor SNP [email protected] Cumbernauld and Kilsyth Jamie Hepburn SNP [email protected] East Kilbride Collette Stevenson SNP [email protected] Falkirk East Michelle Thomson SNP [email protected] Falkirk West Michael Matheson SNP [email protected] Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse Christina McKelvie SNP [email protected] Motherwell and Wishaw Clare Adamson SNP [email protected] Uddingston and Bellshill Stephanie Callaghan SNP [email protected] Regional Central Scotland Richard Leonard Labour [email protected] Central Scotland Monica Lennon Labour [email protected] Central Scotland Mark Griffin Labour [email protected] Central Scotland Stephen Kerr Conservative [email protected] Central Scotland Graham Simpson Conservative [email protected] Central Scotland Meghan Gallacher Conservative [email protected] Central Scotland Gillian Mackay Green [email protected] Constituency MSP Name Party Email Glasgow Anniesland Bill Kidd SNP [email protected] Glasgow Cathcart James Dornan SNP [email protected] Glasgow Kelvin Kaukab Stewart SNP [email protected] Glasgow Maryhill and Springburn Bob Doris SNP [email protected]
  • Campaigning for the Female Vote in the Scottish Independence Referendum: Comparing Women for Independence and Women Together

    Campaigning for the Female Vote in the Scottish Independence Referendum: Comparing Women for Independence and Women Together

    This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Edinburgh University Press in Scottish Affairs. The Version of Record is available online at: http://www.euppublishing.com/doi/abs/10.3366/scot.2018.0234. Campaigning for the Female Vote in the Scottish Independence Referendum: Comparing Women For Independence and Women Together Craig McAngus1 and Kirstein Rummery Abstract The 2014 Scottish independence referendum campaign saw a surge of campaigning activity from groups on both sides of the debate. The mainstream elements of the campaign were criticised for not bringing enough attention to women’s issues, and so Women For Independence (WFI) and Women Together (WT) were created in order to try and alleviate these concerns. This paper aims to compare the two organisations to ascertain whether or not they can be classified as part of wider social movements. Utilising data from the Scottish Political Archive at the University of Stirling, as well as face-to-face interviews and email conversations with activists from both groups, this paper explores the organisational structures and framing strategies of the two groups, as well as the opportunities and constraints they faced when it came to achieving their goals. Whilst WFI can be classified as a Social Movement Organisation operating within both the pro-independence and women’s movements, WT cannot be classified in this way and simply existed as a useful campaigning label during the independence referendum. WFI still continues to exist as a healthy, autonomous entitythat, should a second independence referendum be called, will be in a strong position to campaign for the female vote and overturn the persistent gender gap that exists in support for Scottish independence.
  • Referendum on the Independence of Scotland Laura Meynet

    Referendum on the Independence of Scotland Laura Meynet

    Referendum on the Independence of Scotland Laura Meynet To cite this version: Laura Meynet. Referendum on the Independence of Scotland: the Campaign (2012-2014). Education. 2018. hal-02353499 HAL Id: hal-02353499 https://hal-univ-fcomte.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02353499 Submitted on 7 Nov 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivatives| 4.0 International License _____________________________________ Mémoire présenté pour l’obtention du Grade de MASTER « Métiers de l’Enseignement, de l’Education et de la Formation » Mention 2nd degré, Professeur des Lycées et Collèges, Anglais Referendum on the Independence of Scotland : the Campaign (2012- 2014) présenté par MEYNET Laura Sous la direction de : Monsieur LAPLACE Philippe (UFR SLHS) Année universitaire 2017-2018 Remerciements Je tiens à remercier sincèrement les personnes qui m’ont aidée dans l’écriture de ce mémoire, d’une manière ou d’une autre. Je souhaite remercier en premier lieu mon directeur de recherche, Monsieur Philippe Laplace, pour le temps qu’il m’a consacré, ses conseils, sa patience et sa bienveillance, ainsi que pour les nombreux ouvrages qu’il m’a généreusement confiés pendant la rédaction de ce mémoire.