Why I Hesitate to Call Myself, “Priest” a Hazard Rather Than a Help?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Why I Hesitate to Call Myself, “Priest” a Hazard Rather Than a Help? Why I Hesitate to Call Myself, “Priest” Words matter, and the word, “priest,” is definitely not a throwaway word. Our understanding and use of it has implications for how we think God relates to humanity and what we think living as a Christian is all about. The title, priest, in the Anglican tradition refers to one office in the threefold ministry of “Holy Orders”: deacons, priests, and bishops. Historically understood, priests are persons called and set apart for spiritual leadership in a congregation (preaching, teaching, pastoral care, etc). Anglicanism, of course, is not the only Christian tradition to call their clergy priests, and the title is not used consistently among Anglicans, but it has been used, more-or-less, from the beginning of the movement in the 16th century. Honestly, the title, “priest,” has always made me a bit uncomfortable. Some of my discomfort came from growing up in a Christian tradition that has an allergy to anything that sounds Roman Catholic. This environment trained me to see “priests” through the lens of Martin Luther’s critique of the Church in the 16th century: disconnected, ritualistic, and even abusive. Priests were cast as the brand of ministers who preached works righteousness, sold indulgences, and pretended to do things only Jesus can do (like forgive sins). They were qualitatively unlike the pastors I knew and trusted, who bore the clerical title, “brother.” Over time, however, I learned that even those ministers I called “brother” were not immune to the same leadership abuses and failures that plague those called “priests.” I also learned that, while Luther’s critique was and is appropriate in some cases, my categorical bias against that tradition was narrow and misinformed. Even still, while I affirm that the title, priest, has its place within Anglicanism and should not be shucked completely, I often hesitate to use it as a self-description. I hesitate because that title can often become an unnecessary hazard, rather than a help, to discipleship and mission. In other words, using “priest” as a primary way of referring to my function as an ordained minister feels like trying to swim upstream, against the current, in order to get downstream. The word is not wrong per se, but the image of ministry it evokes tends to misrepresent and convolute, creating unnecessary hurdles both for Christians and non- Christians, rather than evoking images that clarify and empower others to trust Jesus. A hazard rather than a help? The title is a hazard, rather than a help, to mission because it often creates a sense of distance and otherness (at best) or suspicion and distrust (at worst) for those who are far from Jesus. Rather than engendering a safe space for meaningful conversations about Jesus, identifying myself as a priest tends to slam the door permanently on the possibility of vulnerability or erect walls that will need deconstructing. It’s not always or universally a hazard, of course, but it is often enough for me to be hesitant. Priest, moreover, is often a hazard, rather than a help, to discipleship because the misunderstanding that word can create about my role as a minister (see below) often dis- empowers non-clergy to be and make disciples by undercutting a core Anglican affirmation of faith – the priesthood of all believers. In God’s kingdom in Christ, the Spirit empowers and gifts all believers to participate in the work of the ministry – building up the body of Christ (see Eph. 4; Romans 12; and 1 Cor. 12). All in Christ are priests in God’s kingdom (1 Peter 2). Truly, not everyone is called and set apart to function as a leader, but the ministry of being and making disciples is an entire community affair. Discipleship gets undercut when churches function as if the work of ministry is the exclusive job of the professional, ordained clergy – as if clergy bear all the gifts. Through both our rhetoric and actions, we often centralize ministry among a few “professionals” such that, at best, the rest of the congregation can only volunteer to support the clergy’s ministry, rather than be empowered by the clergy to live into their gifts and share-in the work of ministry. Churches with leaders of all kinds of titles have this problem, but the title, priest, is particularly a hazard, rather than a help, to lay people embracing their priesthood in God’s kingdom. For this reason, I hesitate. Technically speaking… Technically, the title for the office into which I have been called and ordained the New Testament calls “presbyter” (and the service for ordination in the Book of Common Prayer uses the title presbyter interchangeably with priest). Most modern English translations render this word as “elder” (for example: 1 Tim. 5:17ff and Titus 1:5-9). Presbyters, along with deacons and overseers (aka, bishops), are individuals whom the community identifies and sets apart for spiritual leadership: teaching, administration, and pastoral care. Within the first several centuries of Christian history, Latin became the dominant language of the church. The office and function of ordained ministry became connected with the Latin word sacerdos, which is the Latin translation of the term used for “priests” in the Old Testament, not the New. The problem is not simply semantic. The role of a priest in the Old Testament is fundamentally different than the role of a presbyter in the New, and the difference has major theological implications. Priests in the OT were ministers of the Temple system – performing sacrifices and functioning as mediators between God and Israel. Moreover, priests did not simply perform a unique function within the community, they also had special access to holy things, holy places, and Holy Presence that non-Levite Israelites did not have. The role called presbyter, on the other hand, has only to do with function within the community, not access to God or ability to do certain “holy” things that other Christians do not have or cannot do. Not everyone is called to function as a presbyter, but everyone in Christ is, by the Spirit, a priest in God’s Kingdom. The author of Hebrews, for instance, argues at length that Jesus Christ made obsolete the sacrificial system – needing continual sacrifices and a mediator – by becoming the perfect priest and sacrifice, once and for all. The curtain is torn – mediation is no longer necessary – Jesus gives access for all God’s people to God’s life. The implication is that, even if we translate presbyter as priest, we would have to keep in mind that the priest in Christ’s church is not equivalent to and does not function in the same capacity as the Levite in the Temple. This reality leads me to ask myself, “If the title is not scripturally, theologically, or practically necessary or clearly helpful, then why not lean toward more helpful and accurate words and images?” Anglicans regularly use titles like presbyter, pastor, and rector to describe the unique office of ordained leadership in ministry. Whatever you feel comfortable calling me, my hope is that we would both know and live in light of this: (1) Just because I am ordained does not mean that I have special powers, access, or privileges to God’s presence that you do not have; (2) we are both gifted by the Spirit to build up the body and be on mission; (3) I see my primary job as an ordained minister as leading by empowering you to trust and follow Jesus. .
Recommended publications
  • HIPPOLYTUS and the 6000-YEAR CHRONOLOGY Notwithstanding
    CHAPTER FIVE HIPPOLYTUS AND THE 6000-YEAR CHRONOLOGY Notwithstanding being known today as one of the most important theologians of the 3rd-century Christian Church in the West, Hip- polytus ’ life and writings are not as well known as we might initially think. Most scholars explain this by referring to Hippolytus ’ schismatic activities, adding the fact that he wrote in Greek instead of Latin. It is commonly accepted that Hippolytus lived between c.170 A.D. and 236 A.D. and that he held a solid reputation among the Roman presbyters. However, little is known regarding his early life, and what we know about his later career is still under dispute. Even Eusebius is not positive about which church he led.1 Historical sources also do not allow us to confirm whether he was a disciple of Irenaeus (he probably was not), although it is commonly accepted that he attended one of Origen ’s sermons during his stay in Rome. We also know that the his- torical sources refer to him both as a bishop and as a presbyter, which reflects in a certain way that his importance was different in the West than it was in the East.2 In fact, Hippolytus appears to have been only a presbyter; however, in the Orient it was common to speak of him as a bishop. Later, Hippolytus , a man some said to be very strict in terms of orthodoxy, was convinced that Pope Callistus was a heretic, and therefore regarded Callistus as an antipope. During that period, he attacked not only Callistus but also his successors, namely, Urban and Pontianus .
    [Show full text]
  • The Apostolic Fathers with Justin Martyr and Irenaeus by Philip Schaff About ANF01
    ANF01. The Apostolic Fathers with Justin Martyr and Irenaeus by Philip Schaff About ANF01. The Apostolic Fathers with Justin Martyr and Irenaeus by Philip Schaff Title: ANF01. The Apostolic Fathers with Justin Martyr and Irenaeus URL: http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf01.html Author(s): Schaff, Philip (1819-1893) Publisher: Grand Rapids, MI: Christian Classics Ethereal Library Description: The Ante-Nicene Christian library is meant to comprise translations into English of all the extant works of the Fathers down to the date of the first General Council held at Nice in A.D. 325. The sole provisional exception is that of the more bulky writings of Origen. It is intended at present only to embrace in the scheme the Contra Celsum and the De Principiis of that voluminous author; but the whole of his works will be included should the undertaking prove successful. Publication History: Text edited by Rev. Alexander Roberts and James Donaldson and first published in Edinburgh, 1867. Additional introductionary material and notes provided for the American edition by A. Cleveland Coxe 1886. Print Basis: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, reprint 2001 Source: Logos Research Systems, Inc. Rights: Public Domain Date Created: 2002-10 Status: Proof reading, ThML markup and subject index for Version 3.0 by Timothy Lanfear General Comments: Hebrew and Greek were checked against page scans of the 1995 Hendrickson reprint by SLK; errors in the hard copy have not been corrected in this digitized text. Contributor(s): Timothy Lanfear (Markup) CCEL Subjects: All; Early Church; Classic; Proofed; LC Call no: BR60 LC Subjects: Christianity Early Christian Literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Selecting an Interim Pastor-Associate Pastor
    SELECTING AN INTERIM PASTOR/INTERIM ASSOCIATE PASTOR* 1 National Capital Presbytery – Committee on Ministry Congregational Transitions Commission (CTC) Approved by CTC, fall 2014; last update, 11/22/16 Step Responsible Party 1.0 Presbytery is notified that the installed pastor is leaving. Pastor or Clerk of Session 1.1 Co-Chairs of Congregational Transitions Commission (CTC) are notified. COM Administrator 1.2 The Session and the congregation are notified by letter of the pastor’s departure. Pastor 1.3 A COM liaison is appointed. Liaison Coordinator, with Co- Chairs 1.4 Arrangements are made for a member of the CTC to meet with Session regarding the CTC Co-Chair and/or COM liaison vacancy period and selection of an Interim Pastor. Links to materials are sent to Pastor or Clerk before the Session meeting: • Guidelines for Interim Ministry • How to Find an Interim Minister • Interim Minister Contract • Former Pastors’ Policy • Letter to Pastor re Former Pastors’ Policy • Letter to Congregation re Former Pastors’ Policy 2.0 CTC Transitions meets with the Session. The search for an interim pastor may begin, in CTC Co-Chair, plus another consultation with CTC, after the pastor has informed the Presbytery and congregation of his/her member of CTC if possible, such intention to leave the position. Depending on the length of time between the pastor’s as the COM liaison announcement and his/her departure this may enable the interim to be in place soon after the pastor has departed the congregation. See Steps 5-9 below. In the meeting with the
    [Show full text]
  • PRIEST” in the PRAYER BOOK Church Association Tract 232
    THE USE OF THE TERM “PRIEST” IN THE PRAYER BOOK Church Association Tract 232 IT is sometimes carelessly alleged that the essential meaning of the word “priest” is “one who offers sacrifice.” That, however, is contrary to fact. Any good dictionary taken at random will dissipate this fable. The idea of sacrifice was not involved in the etymology of the word, and the later association of “priest “ with sacrifice sprang out of the accidental union in the same person of two separate offices. It is matter for regret that the translators of the Old Testament used the word “priest,” to render the Hebrew “cohen.” “The original meaning of the word ‘cohen,’ (says Canon R. B. Girdlestone in his excellent Synonyms of the Old Testament, page 383) is lost in obscurity. In 1 Kings iv.-5 the Authorised version renders it ‘principal officer’ (compare the marginal rendering of verse 2); in 2 Sam. viii.-18, and xx.-26 it has been rendered ‘chief ruler’ (margin, ‘princes’). David’s own sons were thus designated, but it seems impossible now to decide what duties were involved under this name. In Job xii.-19 it is rendered ‘princes.’ The French and other nations which have translated the word ‘Sacrificer,’ have made a mistake, because it is not the business of the priest to sacrifice. The people are the sacrificers, i.e. slayers of the victim; whilst the priests, according to the Levitical system, sprinkled the blood of atonement on the altar, and turned the pieces into fragrant smoke; and this they did as the representatives of the mercy of God.
    [Show full text]
  • Another Anglican View 11 C
    TO BE A PRIEST Perspectives on Vocation and Ordination edited by RaBERT E. TERWILLIGER URBAN T. HOLMES, ItrI with a Foreword by John Maury Allin A Crossroad Book THE SEABURY PRESS O NEW YORK The Seabury Press 815 Second Avenue New York, N.Y. 10017 Copyright O 1975 by The Seabury Press, Inc. Printed in the United States of America All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission from the publisher, except for brief quotations in critical reviews and articles. LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CÄTALOGING IN PUBLIC.A,TION DAT.A Main entry under title: To be a priest. "A Crossroad book." Bibliography: p. 1. Priests-Addresses, essays, lectures. 2. Priesthood-Addresses, essays, lectures. I. Ter- wilÌiger, Robert E. II. Holmes, Urban Tigner, 1930- 8V662.T6 262'.r4 75-28248 ISBN 0-8164-2592-2 contents FOREWORD John Maurg AIIín rx c. PREFACE Robert E. Teruillíger and Urban T' Holmes be reproduced in any manner whatsoever ter, except for brief quotations in cri;ic; Pørt L What ís a Príest? 1. One Anglican View Robert E. TerwíIlíger 2. Another Anglican View 11 C. FitøSímons AIIíson 3. An Orthodox Statement 2L Thomas HoPko 4. A Roman Catholic Catechism 29 Quentín Quesnell Pørt IL The Príesthood ín the Bíble ønd Hístory 5. Priesthood in the History of Religions 45 loseph Kítagaua 6. The Priesthood of Christ 55 MEIes M' Bourke 7. Priesthood in the New Testament 63 ,UBLICATION DATA Louís Weil 8. Presbyters in the EarlY Church 7L MasseE H. ShePherd, Jr' 9.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mission and Ministry of the Whole Church
    The Mission and Ministry of the Whole Church Biblical, theological and contemporary perspectives The Faith and Order Advisory Group of the Church of England i ii Contents Foreword Acknowledgements Chapter 1 Introduction: the origin and aim of this report Chapter 2 Ministry, the New Testament and the Church today Chapter 3 The changing context for mission and ministry in the Church of England Chapter 4 Towards a theology of mission and ministry, ordained and lay Chapter 5 Summary and recommendations Notes iii Foreword The Right Reverend John Hind: Chairman of the Faith and Order Advisory Group Questions, both theological and practical, about ministry are preoccupying many churches today. Historic patterns and understandings are being widely reconsidered as social change and ecumenical dialogue alter the context in which Christian ministry is exercised. For Anglicans, this reconsideration has focused on two main areas: the nature and exercise of the episcopate (especially in dialogue with Lutheran and Methodist churches); and the diaconate and its relation to the presbyterate, on the one hand, and to ‘lay ministries’, on the other. It is the latter set of questions that has given rise to the present study document. The history and character of the Church of England, attempting as it does to hold together different emphases and understandings of ministry, often make it difficult for us to handle these questions in a coherent and united way. The difficulty frequently surfaces (or lies just below the surface) in General Synod debates on ecumenical, liturgical or ministry-related matters. This report is offered as a resource for ongoing discussion as the Church of England responds to challenges to renew its ministry for the twenty-first century.
    [Show full text]
  • The Episcopate
    JUNE 1988 SPECIAL ISSUE • A Publication of the Liturgical Commission of The Episcopal Diocese of New York The Reverend Wayne R. Schmidt, Chairperson Beatrice Pasternak, Editor Archivist. The Episcopate the As the Diocese of New York approaches its election of a Bishop Co-Adjutor on of September 27, the New York Liturgical Commission is pleased to publish this special issue of AMEN! on The Episcopate by two eminent scholars of our church permission and diocese. The Editor without forbidden material this of Reproduction USA. Church Episcopal the of Archives DFMS: Copyright, Tenth century mosaic from Agia Sophia, Istanbul, of St. John Chrysostom who..'11 he was Bishop of Cunstaminoplc. The Episcopal vesture is archiac in style, dating from before L.'JC period when Ea.~ tern bishops began to wear impcri3l \'C~ lm c nls. ordained presbyter or priest. In the 11th century the Archdeacon The Office of the Bishop Hildebrand was elected to the papacy, and a contemporary account in the Book of Common Prayer tells that he was ordained sacerdos (priest) on Ember Saturday after Pentecost and was consecrated bishop, as Pope Gregory VII, on the Feast of SS Peter and Paul. Of the several deacons raised to the Anglican tradition has always greatly honored the threefold episcopate at Rome, he is said to have been the first to be ordained to ministry of Bishops, Priests and Deacons, and has insisted that this the priesthood before being ordained bishop. commit~men~ represents the continuation of a tradition reaching from By that time theologians were beginning to say that it is the the earliest history of the Church.
    [Show full text]
  • Anglican Ordination Rites the Berkeley Statement: ‘To Equip the Saints’
    Anglican Ordination Rites The Berkeley Statement: ‘To Equip the Saints’ Findings of the Sixth International Anglican Liturgical Consultation, Berkeley, California, 2001 Edited by Paul Gibson Coordinator for Liturgy for the Anglican Consultative Council GROVE BOOKS LIMITED RIDLEY HALL RD CAMBRIDGE CB3 9HU First Impression February 2002 ISSN 0144-1728 ISBN 1 85174 489 4 Contents Introduction............................................................................................................3 1. The Ordered Nature of the Church.................................................................4 Bishops.........................................................................................................5 Presbyters/Priests ......................................................................................7 Deacons........................................................................................................8 2. The Liturgy of Ordination ..............................................................................11 General Principles....................................................................................11 Elements of the Rite..................................................................................12 Other Points to be Considered................................................................17 Appendix: Ecumenical Statements....................................................................20 Those Present at the Consultation..........................................................24 Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • "In Persona Christi" Its Significance for the Theology of Ministerial
    "IN PERSONA CHRISTI" ITS SIGNIFICANCE FOR THE THEOLOGY OF MINISTERIAL PRIESTHOOD IN THE DOCUMENTS OF VATICAN II by Jerome F. Thompson, B.A. A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School, Marquette University, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Milwaukee, Wisconsin Apr iI, 1987 Preface It was in my service as Coordinator of Hispanic Affairs for the Archdiocese of Milwaukee that I felt the need to formally work toward a degree in theology at Marquette University. The Hispanic community and the staff of the Apostolate inspired and encouraged me to undertake the task. A lot of years and a lot of work have intervened since this work was first begun. I wish to express my thanks to the Hispanic community and staff in Milwaukee for their continued personal and academic support. It am grateful to the members of the theology department of Marquette, especially Rev. William Kelly SJ and Rev. Philip J. Rossi SJ in their assistance as chairs of the department, to Rev. Richard Roach SJ, my first advisor, and Rev. Donald Keefe SJ, my final advisor, for their patience and guidance, and to Rev. Joseph Lienhard SJ and Rev. Joseph Murphy SJ who served on the reading and approval committee. I wish also to express my thanks to the officers and staff of the National Organization for the Continuing Education of Roman Catholic Clergy (NOCERCC) for whom I have worked these past five years for nudging me on and enduring my research ,and writing. Catholic Theological Union in Chicago provided a great support to me especially through its fine library resources.
    [Show full text]
  • What Should I Call You? Addressing the Presbyter
    WHAT SHOULD I CALL YOU? ADDRESSING THE PRESBYTER LIBERTY BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY BY ROBERT B. EVANS, III PH. D. candidate in Theology and Apologetics Senior Pastor – Macon Baptist Church, Macon, North Carolina LYNCHBURG, VIRGINIA JUNE 12, 2012 CONTENTS Introduction…………………..………………..…………….……...………..……………………1 The Term evpi,skopoj - Under-Shepherd………………………………...………………...…….…2 The Duties of Under-Shepherd - evpi,skopoj …………………………………………………..….7 Beliefs and Experiences and the Under-Shepherd - evpi,skopoj…………………………..............12 Conclusion ……...……………………………………………………………………………….17 Bibliography …………………………………………………………...………………………..19 i What Should I Call You? Addressing the Presbyter With the powerful effect of the internet, it is almost impossible to remain incognito in today’s society. Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, MySpace, Blogs, and various other social media have completely changed the attitude of the world. Each of these different aspects of social media opens the door of opportunity for a person to gain instant notoriety. Perhaps, it is the prospect of being recognized or noticed that can be enamoring; however, recognition can come with a heavy price. The conceivable price for being noticed, is that it creates a persona that was, at times, not intended in the origin. Moreover, once a person has created an image, that image is possibly forever burned in the minds of everyone that had taken notice of the original show. Thus, that person has been “labeled,” and “labels” are not easy to shake off. What is interesting about this, is that the person seemingly desired to become known, but now has created a character that is classified by a concept. Impressions can be perplexing, yet for some reason human beings like to be able to recognize others with some sort of classification.
    [Show full text]
  • POSITION DESCRIPTION CONNECTIONAL PRESBYTER New Castle Presbytery the CONNECTIONAL PRESBYTER Is One of Two New Full-Time Staff P
    POSITION DESCRIPTION CONNECTIONAL PRESBYTER New Castle Presbytery The CONNECTIONAL PRESBYTER is one of two new full-time staff positions (with a Missional Presbyter) created in the New Castle Presbytery (hereafter the NCP). In the restructured staffing model, the new Connectional Presbyter will serve the NCP in three broad arenas of ministry: − Pastoral support, for both ministers of the Word and Sacrament and elders, including commissioned lay pastors (CLPs), who are serving actively in the work of the NCP, − Advocate and agent, for recruiting ministers of the Word and Sacrament for service within the NCP. − Stated Clerk, serving the NCP in accordance with the specifications of G-3.0104 and G- 3.0305 of the Book of Order. The Connectional Presbyter will be the staff person connecting the system of governance and the bodies responsible for congregational ministry within the NCP and also within the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) (hereafter the PC (USA). In both celebration and challenge, and in consultation and cooperation with the Missional Presbyter, she or he will resource the NCP’s Committee on Leadership, Committee on Ministers and Congregations (formerly the Committee on Ministry), Committee on Preparation for Missional Ministry, Committee on Representation and Nominations, Trustees (including Budget Committee), the Permanent Judicial Commission (PJC), and, with the Missional Presbyter, will also manage and coordinate the work of the NCP office staff. Nomination and Election: The Connectional Presbyter will be nominated by a search committee and elected by the full NCP to the position for a five (5)-year term. Accountability: The Connectional Presbyter is accountable to the NCP through the Human Resources subcommittee of the Committee on Leadership.
    [Show full text]
  • Presbytery of Sacramento General Presbyter Job Description TITLE
    Presbytery of Sacramento General Presbyter Job Description TITLE: General Presbyter PURPOSE: The General Presbyter is called and elected by the Presbytery of Sacramento and is accountable to the Presbytery through its Council. The General Presbyter is employed by the Synod of the Pacific and is accountable to the Synod for the purpose of implementing Synod’s personnel policies and procedures. REPORTS TO: The Presbytery of Sacramento through the Personnel Committee and the Council of the Presbytery. GENERAL GOAL OF THE POSITION: To lead the Presbytery in following its vision of nurturing leaders and equipping congregations to share in the mission of Jesus Christ. RESPONSIBILITIES, TASKS AND PERFORMANCE RESULTS EXPECTED: 1. Function: Provide leadership, support, and guidance to leaders in the Presbytery (30%). A. Tasks: i. Listen and discern together God’s vision for the Presbytery of Sacramento by meeting with congregations (youth to older adults), sessions, pastors, committees, other groups of Presbytery, and by participating in Presbytery Meetings ii. Help the Presbytery listen collectively for the voice of God iii. Help the Presbytery discern its direction and focus for the future iv. Build relationships of trust and collegiality with teaching elders and ruling elders v. Visit with pastors, sessions, etc. in times of worship, study, and fellowship vi. Train and develop ruling elders and sessions as spiritual leaders vii. Coach teaching elders to build on their strengths. viii. Collaborate with the Stated Clerk as colleagues and resource persons to ecclesiastical committees B. Performance meets satisfactory expectation when: i. The General Presbyter is meeting with and facilitating discussions with congregations, sessions, pastors, committees, and other groups of Presbytery regarding the vision for the Presbytery ii.
    [Show full text]