DOCSLIB.ORG

PRIEST” in the PRAYER BOOK Church Association Tract 232

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PRIEST” in the PRAYER BOOK Church Association Tract 232 THE USE OF THE TERM “PRIEST” IN THE PRAYER BOOK Church Association Tract 232 IT is sometimes carelessly alleged that the essential meaning of the word “priest” is “one who offers sacrifice.” That, however, is contrary to fact. Any good dictionary taken at random will dissipate this fable. The idea of sacrifice was not involved in the etymology of the word, and the later association of “priest “ with sacrifice sprang out of the accidental union in the same person of two separate offices. It is matter for regret that the translators of the Old Testament used the word “priest,” to render the Hebrew “cohen.” “The original meaning of the word ‘cohen,’ (says Canon R. B. Girdlestone in his excellent Synonyms of the Old Testament, page 383) is lost in obscurity. In 1 Kings iv.-5 the Authorised version renders it ‘principal officer’ (compare the marginal rendering of verse 2); in 2 Sam. viii.-18, and xx.-26 it has been rendered ‘chief ruler’ (margin, ‘princes’). David’s own sons were thus designated, but it seems impossible now to decide what duties were involved under this name. In Job xii.-19 it is rendered ‘princes.’ The French and other nations which have translated the word ‘Sacrificer,’ have made a mistake, because it is not the business of the priest to sacrifice. The people are the sacrificers, i.e. slayers of the victim; whilst the priests, according to the Levitical system, sprinkled the blood of atonement on the altar, and turned the pieces into fragrant smoke; and this they did as the representatives of the mercy of God. It need hardly be said that no process answering to this peculiar rite is exercised by the Christian ministry.” Dean Plumptre remarks, in Smith’s Dictionary of the Bible (II.-925), that “the history of language presents few stranger facts than those connected with these words. Priest, our only equivalent for Hiereus, comes to us from the word which was chosen because it excluded the idea of a sacerdotal character. Bishop has narrowly escaped a like perversion, occurring, as it constantly does, in Wycliffe’s version as the translation of Archiereus (e.g., John xviii-15, Heb. viii.-1.)” Wycliffe used “priest” correctly in such passages as Acts xiv.-23, l Tim. v.-17: not so much translating, as transferring the original word. The best excuse that can be offered for the translators of the Bible is that there was no single English word which would exactly hit off the peculiar function of a sacrificing priest. The people “offered” and “presented” their offerings, so that there was no word left to discriminate exclusively the peculiar function of the professional ministrant. To have repeated the two words “sacrificing priest” every time that “cohen” recurred might have proved wearisome and awkward; but the unfortunate result has been to create a confusion in the minds of the Bible-reading Protestants between the Levitical priest and the Christian presbyter. Let the blame, however, be thrown on the right shoulders: for the compilers of the Liturgy used the word “priest” in its strict sense as the abbreviated form of “presbyter”; whereas the translators of the Old Testament applied it in a restricted meaning which was not proper to the word itself. We propose to illustrate this by a few extracts from the writings of the leading translators of the English Bible, and the chief Apologists for the English Prayer Book when both had just been recently issued. TYNDALE rightly claims the foremost place, and he candidly admits that priest was not the rightful translation of the Hebrew word cohen. He says:— Church Association Tract 232 Page 1 of 3 “There is a word in Latin SACERDOS, in Greek HIEREUS, in Hebrew COHAN, that is minister, an officer, a sacrificer, or priest; as Aaron was a priest, and sacrificed for the people, and was a mediator between God and them. And in the English should it have had some other name than priest. But Antichrist hath deceived us with unknown and strange terms, to bring us into confusion and superstitious blindness. Of that manner is Christ a priest for ever, and all we priests through him, and need no more of any such priest on earth, to be a mean for us unto God. For Christ hath brought us into the inner temple, within the veil or forehanging, and unto the mercy-stool of God, and hath coupled us unto God; where we offer, every man for himself, the desires and petitions of his heart, and sacrifice and kill the lusts and appetites of his flesh, with prayer, fasting, and all manner godly living. Another word is there in Greek, called presbyter, in Latin senior, in English an Elder, and is nothing but an officer to teach, and not to be a mediator between God and us.” (Doctrinal Treatises, page 255.) FULKE, in his Defence of the English Translations of the Bible (page 109, cf. pp. 242, 243), replied to his Romish adversary:—“You corruptly translate sacerdos and presbyter always as though they were all one, a priest, as though the Holy Ghost had made that distinction in vain, or that there were no difference between the priesthood of the New Testament and the Old. The name of the priest, according to the original derivation from presbyter, we do not refuse; but according to the common acception for a sacrificer, we cannot take it, when it is spoken of the ministry of the New Testament. And although many of the ancient Fathers have abusively confounded the terms of sacerdos and presbyter, yet that is no warrant for us to translate the Scripture, and to confound that which we see manifestly the Spirit of God hath distinguished . Neither is presbyter by ecclesiastical use so appropriated to signify a priest, that you would always translate it so in the Old Testament, where your Vulgar translator useth it for a name of office and government, and not for priests at any time.” Indeed this was freely admitted by the other side. It is not generally known that HARDING the Jesuit published a partial reply to Jewel’s celebrated “Apology” at Louvain, in 1567, cum pivilegio. There is a copy of this rare work in the British Museum bearing the lengthy title—A rejoinder to M. Jewel’s replie against the sacrifice of the Mass. In which the doctrine of the Answers to the xvii Article of the Challenge is defended, and further proved, and all that this reply containeth against the sacrifice is clearly confuted and disproved by Thomas Harding, Doctor of divinitie. On page 13 of this work Harding says:—“I am constrained by the Replie to make a distinction between these two terms sacerdos and presbyter by which the persons of the highest order in the Church be called, and in our English tongue there want two distinct terms correspondent with them, the name of priest serving to both, as common use hath received; I will for a few leaves, that my talk may be more distinct and better perceived, use the term sacrificer for the Latin sacerdos, and the term priest for the word presbyter.” Archbishop WHITGIFT in defending the Prayer Book against Cartwright, said:— “The name of priest need not be so odious unto you as you would seem to make it. I suppose it cometh of this word presbyter, not of sacerdos; and then the matter is not great . The learned and best of our English writers, such I mean as write in these our days, translate this word presbyter so: and the very word itself, as it is used in our English tongue, soundeth the word presbyter. As heretofore use hath made it to be taken for a sacrificer, so will use now alter that signification, and make it to be taken for a minister of the Gospel. But it is mere vanity to contend for the name when we agree of the thing: the name may be used, and not used, without any great offence.” (Works, III.-350- 1. Compare II.-311.) HOOKER supported the same contention by urging— “As for the people when they hear the name it draweth no more their minds to any cogitation of sacrifice, that the name of a Senator or Alderman causeth them to think upon old age or to imagine that everyone so termed must needs be ancient because years were respected in the first nomination of both. Wherefore to pass by the name, let them use what dialect they will, whether we call it a Priesthood, a Presbytership, or a Ministry it skilleth not; although in truth the word presbyter doth seem Church Association Tract 232 Page 2 of 3 more fit, and in propriety of speech more agreeable than priest with the drift of the whole Gospel of Jesus Christ . The Holy Ghost throughout the body of the New Testament making so much mention of them doth not anywhere call them priests. The prophet Esay, I grant, doth; but in such sort as the ancient Fathers, by way of analogy.” (Eccl. Polity, ed. Keble, II.-471.) BULLINGER, in his “Decades,” sanctioned by convocation, explains this “analogy.” “It appeareth that the ministers of the New Testament, for a certain likeness which they have with ministers of the Old Testament, of ecclesiastical writers are called priests; for as they did the service in the tabernacle, so these also, after their manner and fashion, minister to the Church of God. For otherwise the Latin word (sacerdos) is derived of holy things, and signifieth a minister of holy things; a man, I say, dedicated and consecrated unto God to do holy things.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • HIPPOLYTUS and the 6000-YEAR CHRONOLOGY Notwithstanding
    CHAPTER FIVE HIPPOLYTUS AND THE 6000-YEAR CHRONOLOGY Notwithstanding being known today as one of the most important theologians of the 3rd-century Christian Church in the West, Hip- polytus ’ life and writings are not as well known as we might initially think. Most scholars explain this by referring to Hippolytus ’ schismatic activities, adding the fact that he wrote in Greek instead of Latin. It is commonly accepted that Hippolytus lived between c.170 A.D. and 236 A.D. and that he held a solid reputation among the Roman presbyters. However, little is known regarding his early life, and what we know about his later career is still under dispute. Even Eusebius is not positive about which church he led.1 Historical sources also do not allow us to confirm whether he was a disciple of Irenaeus (he probably was not), although it is commonly accepted that he attended one of Origen ’s sermons during his stay in Rome. We also know that the his- torical sources refer to him both as a bishop and as a presbyter, which reflects in a certain way that his importance was different in the West than it was in the East.2 In fact, Hippolytus appears to have been only a presbyter; however, in the Orient it was common to speak of him as a bishop. Later, Hippolytus , a man some said to be very strict in terms of orthodoxy, was convinced that Pope Callistus was a heretic, and therefore regarded Callistus as an antipope. During that period, he attacked not only Callistus but also his successors, namely, Urban and Pontianus .
    [Show full text]
  • The Apostolic Fathers with Justin Martyr and Irenaeus by Philip Schaff About ANF01
    ANF01. The Apostolic Fathers with Justin Martyr and Irenaeus by Philip Schaff About ANF01. The Apostolic Fathers with Justin Martyr and Irenaeus by Philip Schaff Title: ANF01. The Apostolic Fathers with Justin Martyr and Irenaeus URL: http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf01.html Author(s): Schaff, Philip (1819-1893) Publisher: Grand Rapids, MI: Christian Classics Ethereal Library Description: The Ante-Nicene Christian library is meant to comprise translations into English of all the extant works of the Fathers down to the date of the first General Council held at Nice in A.D. 325. The sole provisional exception is that of the more bulky writings of Origen. It is intended at present only to embrace in the scheme the Contra Celsum and the De Principiis of that voluminous author; but the whole of his works will be included should the undertaking prove successful. Publication History: Text edited by Rev. Alexander Roberts and James Donaldson and first published in Edinburgh, 1867. Additional introductionary material and notes provided for the American edition by A. Cleveland Coxe 1886. Print Basis: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, reprint 2001 Source: Logos Research Systems, Inc. Rights: Public Domain Date Created: 2002-10 Status: Proof reading, ThML markup and subject index for Version 3.0 by Timothy Lanfear General Comments: Hebrew and Greek were checked against page scans of the 1995 Hendrickson reprint by SLK; errors in the hard copy have not been corrected in this digitized text. Contributor(s): Timothy Lanfear (Markup) CCEL Subjects: All; Early Church; Classic; Proofed; LC Call no: BR60 LC Subjects: Christianity Early Christian Literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Selecting an Interim Pastor-Associate Pastor
    SELECTING AN INTERIM PASTOR/INTERIM ASSOCIATE PASTOR* 1 National Capital Presbytery – Committee on Ministry Congregational Transitions Commission (CTC) Approved by CTC, fall 2014; last update, 11/22/16 Step Responsible Party 1.0 Presbytery is notified that the installed pastor is leaving. Pastor or Clerk of Session 1.1 Co-Chairs of Congregational Transitions Commission (CTC) are notified. COM Administrator 1.2 The Session and the congregation are notified by letter of the pastor’s departure. Pastor 1.3 A COM liaison is appointed. Liaison Coordinator, with Co- Chairs 1.4 Arrangements are made for a member of the CTC to meet with Session regarding the CTC Co-Chair and/or COM liaison vacancy period and selection of an Interim Pastor. Links to materials are sent to Pastor or Clerk before the Session meeting: • Guidelines for Interim Ministry • How to Find an Interim Minister • Interim Minister Contract • Former Pastors’ Policy • Letter to Pastor re Former Pastors’ Policy • Letter to Congregation re Former Pastors’ Policy 2.0 CTC Transitions meets with the Session. The search for an interim pastor may begin, in CTC Co-Chair, plus another consultation with CTC, after the pastor has informed the Presbytery and congregation of his/her member of CTC if possible, such intention to leave the position. Depending on the length of time between the pastor’s as the COM liaison announcement and his/her departure this may enable the interim to be in place soon after the pastor has departed the congregation. See Steps 5-9 below. In the meeting with the
    [Show full text]
  • Another Anglican View 11 C
    TO BE A PRIEST Perspectives on Vocation and Ordination edited by RaBERT E. TERWILLIGER URBAN T. HOLMES, ItrI with a Foreword by John Maury Allin A Crossroad Book THE SEABURY PRESS O NEW YORK The Seabury Press 815 Second Avenue New York, N.Y. 10017 Copyright O 1975 by The Seabury Press, Inc. Printed in the United States of America All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission from the publisher, except for brief quotations in critical reviews and articles. LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CÄTALOGING IN PUBLIC.A,TION DAT.A Main entry under title: To be a priest. "A Crossroad book." Bibliography: p. 1. Priests-Addresses, essays, lectures. 2. Priesthood-Addresses, essays, lectures. I. Ter- wilÌiger, Robert E. II. Holmes, Urban Tigner, 1930- 8V662.T6 262'.r4 75-28248 ISBN 0-8164-2592-2 contents FOREWORD John Maurg AIIín rx c. PREFACE Robert E. Teruillíger and Urban T' Holmes be reproduced in any manner whatsoever ter, except for brief quotations in cri;ic; Pørt L What ís a Príest? 1. One Anglican View Robert E. TerwíIlíger 2. Another Anglican View 11 C. FitøSímons AIIíson 3. An Orthodox Statement 2L Thomas HoPko 4. A Roman Catholic Catechism 29 Quentín Quesnell Pørt IL The Príesthood ín the Bíble ønd Hístory 5. Priesthood in the History of Religions 45 loseph Kítagaua 6. The Priesthood of Christ 55 MEIes M' Bourke 7. Priesthood in the New Testament 63 ,UBLICATION DATA Louís Weil 8. Presbyters in the EarlY Church 7L MasseE H. ShePherd, Jr' 9.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mission and Ministry of the Whole Church
    The Mission and Ministry of the Whole Church Biblical, theological and contemporary perspectives The Faith and Order Advisory Group of the Church of England i ii Contents Foreword Acknowledgements Chapter 1 Introduction: the origin and aim of this report Chapter 2 Ministry, the New Testament and the Church today Chapter 3 The changing context for mission and ministry in the Church of England Chapter 4 Towards a theology of mission and ministry, ordained and lay Chapter 5 Summary and recommendations Notes iii Foreword The Right Reverend John Hind: Chairman of the Faith and Order Advisory Group Questions, both theological and practical, about ministry are preoccupying many churches today. Historic patterns and understandings are being widely reconsidered as social change and ecumenical dialogue alter the context in which Christian ministry is exercised. For Anglicans, this reconsideration has focused on two main areas: the nature and exercise of the episcopate (especially in dialogue with Lutheran and Methodist churches); and the diaconate and its relation to the presbyterate, on the one hand, and to ‘lay ministries’, on the other. It is the latter set of questions that has given rise to the present study document. The history and character of the Church of England, attempting as it does to hold together different emphases and understandings of ministry, often make it difficult for us to handle these questions in a coherent and united way. The difficulty frequently surfaces (or lies just below the surface) in General Synod debates on ecumenical, liturgical or ministry-related matters. This report is offered as a resource for ongoing discussion as the Church of England responds to challenges to renew its ministry for the twenty-first century.
    [Show full text]
  • The Episcopate
    JUNE 1988 SPECIAL ISSUE • A Publication of the Liturgical Commission of The Episcopal Diocese of New York The Reverend Wayne R. Schmidt, Chairperson Beatrice Pasternak, Editor Archivist. The Episcopate the As the Diocese of New York approaches its election of a Bishop Co-Adjutor on of September 27, the New York Liturgical Commission is pleased to publish this special issue of AMEN! on The Episcopate by two eminent scholars of our church permission and diocese. The Editor without forbidden material this of Reproduction USA. Church Episcopal the of Archives DFMS: Copyright, Tenth century mosaic from Agia Sophia, Istanbul, of St. John Chrysostom who..'11 he was Bishop of Cunstaminoplc. The Episcopal vesture is archiac in style, dating from before L.'JC period when Ea.~ tern bishops began to wear impcri3l \'C~ lm c nls. ordained presbyter or priest. In the 11th century the Archdeacon The Office of the Bishop Hildebrand was elected to the papacy, and a contemporary account in the Book of Common Prayer tells that he was ordained sacerdos (priest) on Ember Saturday after Pentecost and was consecrated bishop, as Pope Gregory VII, on the Feast of SS Peter and Paul. Of the several deacons raised to the Anglican tradition has always greatly honored the threefold episcopate at Rome, he is said to have been the first to be ordained to ministry of Bishops, Priests and Deacons, and has insisted that this the priesthood before being ordained bishop. commit~men~ represents the continuation of a tradition reaching from By that time theologians were beginning to say that it is the the earliest history of the Church.
    [Show full text]
  • Anglican Ordination Rites the Berkeley Statement: ‘To Equip the Saints’
    Anglican Ordination Rites The Berkeley Statement: ‘To Equip the Saints’ Findings of the Sixth International Anglican Liturgical Consultation, Berkeley, California, 2001 Edited by Paul Gibson Coordinator for Liturgy for the Anglican Consultative Council GROVE BOOKS LIMITED RIDLEY HALL RD CAMBRIDGE CB3 9HU First Impression February 2002 ISSN 0144-1728 ISBN 1 85174 489 4 Contents Introduction............................................................................................................3 1. The Ordered Nature of the Church.................................................................4 Bishops.........................................................................................................5 Presbyters/Priests ......................................................................................7 Deacons........................................................................................................8 2. The Liturgy of Ordination ..............................................................................11 General Principles....................................................................................11 Elements of the Rite..................................................................................12 Other Points to be Considered................................................................17 Appendix: Ecumenical Statements....................................................................20 Those Present at the Consultation..........................................................24 Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • "In Persona Christi" Its Significance for the Theology of Ministerial
    "IN PERSONA CHRISTI" ITS SIGNIFICANCE FOR THE THEOLOGY OF MINISTERIAL PRIESTHOOD IN THE DOCUMENTS OF VATICAN II by Jerome F. Thompson, B.A. A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School, Marquette University, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Milwaukee, Wisconsin Apr iI, 1987 Preface It was in my service as Coordinator of Hispanic Affairs for the Archdiocese of Milwaukee that I felt the need to formally work toward a degree in theology at Marquette University. The Hispanic community and the staff of the Apostolate inspired and encouraged me to undertake the task. A lot of years and a lot of work have intervened since this work was first begun. I wish to express my thanks to the Hispanic community and staff in Milwaukee for their continued personal and academic support. It am grateful to the members of the theology department of Marquette, especially Rev. William Kelly SJ and Rev. Philip J. Rossi SJ in their assistance as chairs of the department, to Rev. Richard Roach SJ, my first advisor, and Rev. Donald Keefe SJ, my final advisor, for their patience and guidance, and to Rev. Joseph Lienhard SJ and Rev. Joseph Murphy SJ who served on the reading and approval committee. I wish also to express my thanks to the officers and staff of the National Organization for the Continuing Education of Roman Catholic Clergy (NOCERCC) for whom I have worked these past five years for nudging me on and enduring my research ,and writing. Catholic Theological Union in Chicago provided a great support to me especially through its fine library resources.
    [Show full text]
  • What Should I Call You? Addressing the Presbyter
    WHAT SHOULD I CALL YOU? ADDRESSING THE PRESBYTER LIBERTY BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY BY ROBERT B. EVANS, III PH. D. candidate in Theology and Apologetics Senior Pastor – Macon Baptist Church, Macon, North Carolina LYNCHBURG, VIRGINIA JUNE 12, 2012 CONTENTS Introduction…………………..………………..…………….……...………..……………………1 The Term evpi,skopoj - Under-Shepherd………………………………...………………...…….…2 The Duties of Under-Shepherd - evpi,skopoj …………………………………………………..….7 Beliefs and Experiences and the Under-Shepherd - evpi,skopoj…………………………..............12 Conclusion ……...……………………………………………………………………………….17 Bibliography …………………………………………………………...………………………..19 i What Should I Call You? Addressing the Presbyter With the powerful effect of the internet, it is almost impossible to remain incognito in today’s society. Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, MySpace, Blogs, and various other social media have completely changed the attitude of the world. Each of these different aspects of social media opens the door of opportunity for a person to gain instant notoriety. Perhaps, it is the prospect of being recognized or noticed that can be enamoring; however, recognition can come with a heavy price. The conceivable price for being noticed, is that it creates a persona that was, at times, not intended in the origin. Moreover, once a person has created an image, that image is possibly forever burned in the minds of everyone that had taken notice of the original show. Thus, that person has been “labeled,” and “labels” are not easy to shake off. What is interesting about this, is that the person seemingly desired to become known, but now has created a character that is classified by a concept. Impressions can be perplexing, yet for some reason human beings like to be able to recognize others with some sort of classification.
    [Show full text]
  • POSITION DESCRIPTION CONNECTIONAL PRESBYTER New Castle Presbytery the CONNECTIONAL PRESBYTER Is One of Two New Full-Time Staff P
    POSITION DESCRIPTION CONNECTIONAL PRESBYTER New Castle Presbytery The CONNECTIONAL PRESBYTER is one of two new full-time staff positions (with a Missional Presbyter) created in the New Castle Presbytery (hereafter the NCP). In the restructured staffing model, the new Connectional Presbyter will serve the NCP in three broad arenas of ministry: − Pastoral support, for both ministers of the Word and Sacrament and elders, including commissioned lay pastors (CLPs), who are serving actively in the work of the NCP, − Advocate and agent, for recruiting ministers of the Word and Sacrament for service within the NCP. − Stated Clerk, serving the NCP in accordance with the specifications of G-3.0104 and G- 3.0305 of the Book of Order. The Connectional Presbyter will be the staff person connecting the system of governance and the bodies responsible for congregational ministry within the NCP and also within the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) (hereafter the PC (USA). In both celebration and challenge, and in consultation and cooperation with the Missional Presbyter, she or he will resource the NCP’s Committee on Leadership, Committee on Ministers and Congregations (formerly the Committee on Ministry), Committee on Preparation for Missional Ministry, Committee on Representation and Nominations, Trustees (including Budget Committee), the Permanent Judicial Commission (PJC), and, with the Missional Presbyter, will also manage and coordinate the work of the NCP office staff. Nomination and Election: The Connectional Presbyter will be nominated by a search committee and elected by the full NCP to the position for a five (5)-year term. Accountability: The Connectional Presbyter is accountable to the NCP through the Human Resources subcommittee of the Committee on Leadership.
    [Show full text]
  • Presbytery of Sacramento General Presbyter Job Description TITLE
    Presbytery of Sacramento General Presbyter Job Description TITLE: General Presbyter PURPOSE: The General Presbyter is called and elected by the Presbytery of Sacramento and is accountable to the Presbytery through its Council. The General Presbyter is employed by the Synod of the Pacific and is accountable to the Synod for the purpose of implementing Synod’s personnel policies and procedures. REPORTS TO: The Presbytery of Sacramento through the Personnel Committee and the Council of the Presbytery. GENERAL GOAL OF THE POSITION: To lead the Presbytery in following its vision of nurturing leaders and equipping congregations to share in the mission of Jesus Christ. RESPONSIBILITIES, TASKS AND PERFORMANCE RESULTS EXPECTED: 1. Function: Provide leadership, support, and guidance to leaders in the Presbytery (30%). A. Tasks: i. Listen and discern together God’s vision for the Presbytery of Sacramento by meeting with congregations (youth to older adults), sessions, pastors, committees, other groups of Presbytery, and by participating in Presbytery Meetings ii. Help the Presbytery listen collectively for the voice of God iii. Help the Presbytery discern its direction and focus for the future iv. Build relationships of trust and collegiality with teaching elders and ruling elders v. Visit with pastors, sessions, etc. in times of worship, study, and fellowship vi. Train and develop ruling elders and sessions as spiritual leaders vii. Coach teaching elders to build on their strengths. viii. Collaborate with the Stated Clerk as colleagues and resource persons to ecclesiastical committees B. Performance meets satisfactory expectation when: i. The General Presbyter is meeting with and facilitating discussions with congregations, sessions, pastors, committees, and other groups of Presbytery regarding the vision for the Presbytery ii.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Hill on Polycarp Ad Diognetus
    Charles E. Hill, From the Lost Teaching of Polycarp: Identifying Irenaeus' Apostolic Presbyter and the Author of ad Diognetum. vol. 186, Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen Zum Neuen Testament (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2006). 207 pages (incl. index). The treatise ad Diognetum (to Diognetus) written anonymously by Mathetes (the disciple) is one of the most fascinating of the works included in the standard collections of the Apostolic Fathers.1 One supposes that Johannes Quasten’s account of the “epistle” (more on that below) of Mathetes to Diognetus fairly represents the view accepted for most of the twentieth century. First, he treats the treatise as if it were an epistle by an unknown author dependent upon Irenaeus. Some of the possible authors reviewed by Quasten include Hippolytus of Rome and Quadratus.2 He concludes his survey of the treatise by saying the epistle deserves to rank among the most brilliant and beautiful works of Christian Greek literature. The writer is a master of rhetoric, his sentence structure is full of charm and subtly balanced, his style limpid. The content reveals of man of fervent faith and wide knowledge, a mind thoroughly imbued with the principles of Christianity. The diction sparkles with fire and vitality.3 Hubertus Drobner’s 1994 survey reflects some of the developments in modern scholarship, including an acknowledgement that it was probably not an epistle at 1 It has been included among the apostolic father since the 1592 edition of Henri Estienne. See Hubertus R. Drobner, The Fathers of the Church: A Comprehensive Introduction, trans. Siegfried S. Schatzmann (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers, 2007), 75.
    [Show full text]