Becoming Autotheory Ralph Clare

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Becoming Autotheory Ralph Clare Becoming Autotheory Ralph Clare Arizona Quarterly: A Journal of American Literature, Culture, and Theory, Volume 76, Number 1, Spring 2020, pp. 85-107 (Article) Published by Johns Hopkins University Press DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/arq.2020.0003 For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/754798 [ This content has been declared free to read by the pubisher during the COVID-19 pandemic. ] Ralph Clare Becoming Autotheory he impact of the recent boom in what U.S. critics Tand publishers are increasingly calling autofiction is a notable, if curious, phenomenon. Authors such as Chris Kraus, Sheila Heti, Ben Lerner, Maggie Nelson, and Rachel Cusk, as well as the wildly success- ful translations of works by Karl Ove Knausgård and Elena Ferrante, have gained both readerly and critical accolades. In various ways, aut- ofictional works collapse fiction, nonfiction, and autobiography into texts that, as Marjorie Worthington writes, “constantly play with read- erly expectations about memoir and fiction, thwarting both and thereby forcing a recognition that . the line is at times rather permeable” (149). While something about these authors’ works seems radically new, however, several critics have put this boom into historical and cultural perspective. Autofiction, it turns out, has a notable literary and historical lineage.1 Yet within this swath of autofiction, something truly new is emerg- ing: autotheory. Autotheory constitutes something related to yet en- tirely distinct from autofiction. Whereas autofiction responds primarily to the post-postmodern literary scene and the rise of the anyperson memoir, autotheory responds more so to the institutionalization and the so-called death of theory. Whether educated or struggling to learn their art during the heyday of theory in the academy, the authors of autotheoretical texts incorporate critical theory’s terminologies and methodologies into their work in order to transform both its form and content. Chris Kraus (b. 1955) and Maggie Nelson (b. 1973), for ex- ample, represent different generations of writers whose autotheoretical texts engage with theory’s rise and supposed fall. Kraus’s I Love Dick (1996) and Nelson’s The Argonauts (2015) each employ critical theory to similar and different ends that nevertheless expand upon the possi- bilities of both autofiction and theory itself. Taken together, these texts suggest that in autotheory, theory is not employed merely to deconstruct the self or fragment the “I,” though Arizona Quarterly Volume 76, Number 1, Spring 2020 • issn 0004-1610 Copyright © 2020 by Arizona Board of Regents 86 Ralph Clare it may well do so, but to self-consciously and practically construct an ethical or sincere self in a critical manner. If much contemporary Amer- ican autofiction aims to establish an honest or open dialogic with the reader (Sturgeon; Nicol 257), then autotheory’s sincerity lies in the exposure of a vulnerable self that recognizes its contingency and social/ linguistic constructedness while nevertheless insisting upon the “real- ity” and value of lived experience. Thus autotheory avoids the charge of essentialism that haunts identity politics by countering it with a notion of embodied experience that underscores the malleability of identity itself. In autotheory, then, it is not so much that the personal must become political, but that the personal must first become theoretical. Generation Theory and the Theory of Exhaustion In his mildly polemical “The Theory Generation,” Nicholas Dames attempts to take stock of the effects of High or capital-T Theory on a recent generation of American writers who came of intellectual age in the 1980s or thereabouts, during the “the institutionalization of Theory” when “universities began to house and pay significant European think- ers at the moment their influence in their native lands began to wane” (162).2 According to Dames’ reading of “more or less realist novel[s]” by Teju Cole, Lorrie Moore, Jeffrey Eugenides, Ben Lerner, Sam Lip- syte, and Jennifer Egan, Theory Novels are often ambivalent, ironic, or flat-out scathing in assessing the pedagogical and practical value of Theory. For the characters in (and by extension the authors of) such novels, Theory becomes “a seductive phase of education that is finally too cultish and self-enclosed to make sense of the world’s upheavals” (161). The enlightenment that Theory inspires in its questioning of Enlightenment ideals brings, in the end, a disillusionment of its own. At the very least, it is “no longer the key to all the world’s things, but rather just another thing-in-the-world” (163–64). Like Dames, Mitchum Huelhs, in “The Post-Theory Theory Novel,” reflects upon the institutionalization of theory and its implications for thinking about contemporary American literature (284). Yet whereas Dames, like the characters in the novels he reads, remains pessimis- tic about theory’s place in literature or the world, Huehls, exploring not-so “realistic” novels (including works by Jeffrey Eugenides, Salva- dor Plascencia, Ben Marcus, and Percival Everett), is optimistic regard- ing theory’s lasting effects on literature and its potential to transform Becoming Autotheory 87 both words and worlds. Such optimism comes, in part, because Huehls, unlike Dames, does not see the inarguable seduction of theory as merely leading to slavish literary mimicry or mindless devotion to the Mas- ters. For Huehls, this generation of creative writers are always creative readers, and the translated texts that found their way belatedly into the Anglo-American academic scene were responded to in nuanced, not mechanical or fearful, fashion. Huelhs can therefore distinguish what he dubs “the post-theory theory novel” from both Dames’ Theory Novel and Judith Ryan’s version of the theory novel in The Novel After Theory, a book that explores how an earlier generation of mostly postmodern writers responded directly (and positively) to theory.3 It is, for Huehls, the reflexiveness on/of thought itself in the post-theory theory novel that distinguishes it from novels that somehow “do” theory (285–6). Moreover, Huehls points out that a main drawback of Dame’s argument is that it focuses almost exclusively on theory as content (via allusions, jokes, character dialogue, etc.), which might be found in any novel that “simply incorporates theory into a generally realist representational mode” (282). Expanding upon Dames’ ideas, Hue- hls demonstrates the ways in which the “post-theory theory novel” embraces experimentalism and/or metafiction primarily in its form and has thereby seized “the theory novel’s flattened caricature of theory and repurposed it, even revitalized it, for newly aesthetic ends” (306). Authors of such novels “use the well-known tropes of poststructural theory as the tools and building blocks for various forms of unreal real- ism, for speculative fictions that contribute to the composition rather than the deconstruction of the world” (283). Indeed, theory, for Dames, is still spelled with a capital T. It’s imposing, teetering over us, an almost-Cross-to-bear. But Huelhs’ small t theory makes it the mundane and changeable function (use-value) that it has more properly become after much, yet not all, of its hipness (symbolic exchange-value) has worn away. Ultimately, Huelhs contends, “rather than emphasizing the word’s inevitable mediation of the world—a mediation that in theory novels indicates our insuperable alienation from the real—post-theory theory novels incorporate the word into the world, using language to build new, idiosyncratic notions of the real” (288). Thus, “these texts use theory’s concepts to build, rather than undermine, the world” (288). Exploring theory’s effects on the contemporary novel is all well and good, but what does it mean for autotheoretical texts that trouble 88 Ralph Clare the very genre of the novel itself, largely resemble autofictions and/or memoirs, and often employ theory unashamedly in both their form and content (that is, they are also still doing theory)? Indeed, autotheory’s development has less to do with the tradition of the novel so much as it does with that of philosophy and critical theory itself—and particu- larly the kinds of writing that meld personal experience with reflections upon philosophy and theory. In Reading Autobiography: A Guide for Interpreting Life Narratives, Sidonie Smith and Julia Watson provide a more fitting lineage for auto- theory when they identify the works of Montaigne, Walter Benjamin, and Gloria Anzaldúa as examples of what they dub “autocritique,” writ- ing in which “the boundary between criticizing and writing life narra- tive has been deliberately blurred in critical practice” (155–59). Surely, one could establish a through line from Montaigne or even St. Augus- tine to autotheory, but since autotheory as a genre is formed in direct response to the rise, institutionalization, and generational transmission of critical theory, the authors appearing in and under the banner of Theory are more apt to be influential in this case. Thus, certainly the cultural materialist writings of Walter Benjamin, as well as the person- ally reflective analyses of Freud (both authors are standard readings in many theory courses), may provide a better touchstone for autotheo- ry’s forerunners. Benjamin’s ability to mix memoir with philosophy, to turn his ramblings and personal reflections in “A Berlin Chronicle” into critical meditations on time and consciousness that are similar to those in his most famous essays on Proust, Kafka, and Baudelaire, suggest an early model for autotheory. Benjamin’s nuanced version of dialectical materialism always remains grounded in the lived experience of the observer and is never reducible to pure Marxist polemic. Yet even this lineage does not fully account for the specific dilemma of the theory generation and its relation to contemporary American writing. Gloria Anzaldúa, then, stands as a more proper forerunner of the kind of text increasingly taken to be autotheory. The widely read Borderlands/La Frontera: The New Mestiza (1987), for example, is a pow- erful mélange of memoir, critical theory, and poetry.
Recommended publications
  • 03 WIF 2010 Countries 1
    After being diagnosed with AIDS, Hervé Guibert wrote this devastating, darkly humorous and personal novel, chronicling three months in the penultimate year of the narrator’s life. In the wake of his friend Muzil’s death, he goes from one quack doctor to another, from holidays to test centres, and charts the highs and lows of trying to cheat death. On publication in 1990, the novel scandalised French media, which quickly identified Muzil as Guibert’s close friend Michel Foucault. The book became a bestseller, and Guibert a celebrity. The book has since attained a cult following for its tender, fragmented and beautifully written accounts of illness, friendship, sex, art and everyday life. It catapulted Guibert into notoriety and sealed his reputation as a writer of shocking precision and power. Praise for Hervé Guibert: ‘Hervé Guibert’s novel, created in the white heat of his own impending death from AIDS, is written with urgency, clarity, controlled rage. It is an important document charting the shock of diagnosis and illness, but, more than that, it is an astonishing piece of writing, whose tone is gripping and fierce; it is electrifying in its searing honesty and its control of rhythm and cadence’ —Colm Tóibín ‘One of the most beautiful, haunting and fascinating works in the French autofictional canon. Guibert grapples with his own AIDS diagnosis, and the death of his friend Muzil, in a dazzling piece of writing. It’s a book that gives me goosebumps every time I open it – I’m thrilled that it’s being reissued in the UK, where Guibert’s extraordinary writing deserves to be much better known’ —Katherine Angel, author of Tomorrow Sex Will Be Good Again To the Friend prelims.indd 1 27/04/2021 17:33 ‘Guibert’s life work looms before me not merely as what Keats called (describing the Elgin Marbles) the “shadow of a magnitude”, but as the magnitude itself, sans shadow’ —Wayne Koestenbaum, Bookforum ‘Reveals a writer of courage, beguiling flai, and sometimes maddening nastiness … The rare book that truly deserves the epithet “unflinching”.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Is It For? Personal Writing and Antagonistic Readers
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 5-2018 Who Is It For? Personal Writing and Antagonistic Readers Dana Glaser The Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/2594 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] WHO IS IT FOR? PERSONAL WRITING AND ANTAGONISTIC READERS by DANA GLASER A master’s thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Women’s and Gender Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts, The City University of New York 2018 © 2018 DANA GLASER All Rights Reserved ii Who Is It For? Personal Writing and Antagonistic Readers by Dana Glaser This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Women’s and Gender Studies in satisfaction of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Arts. Date Nancy K. Miller Thesis Advisor Date Dana-ain Davis Executive Officer THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iii ABSTRACT Who is it for? Personal Writing and Antagonistic Readers by Dana Glaser Advisor: Nancy K. Miller Feminist accounts of how “the personal” is used in feminist critical nonfiction have theorized that the effect of the personal is to connect the writer with readers who share a sense of her investment in the subject matter.
    [Show full text]
  • Nelson Great-To-Watch NHR-6E.Pdf
    ••• MAGGIE NELSON AMERICAN SOCIETY is SATURATED with violence--and not just theviolence horrif­ ically displayed in early December 2012 at the Sandy Hook Elementary School, where a former student returned to shoot 20 children and 6 adults before he trained his rifle on himself In 2011, the homicide rate in the United States was more than four times greater than Germany's and more than eight times Japan's. But violence hereis not just a social fact-it's also a cultural phenomenon, as poet, critic, and essayist Maggie Nelson understands. Anyone who watches television and YouTube, or spends hours playing video games, will recognize its pervasive­ ness. But Nelson finds violence in a place we might never think to look-in the high arts, especially the cutting-edge tradition known as the avant-garde. Past defenders of the artistic avant-garde celebrated the possibilities opened up by "aesthetic shock," the experience produced by radical disorientation. But -they have tended to soft-pedal its complicity with sadism and terror. At times, Nelson herself seems to be thrilled by the avant-garde's liberating openness, but she tries to nudge artists and art lovers toward what one reviewer, writing in the New York Time�, calls a "post-avant-garde aesthetics." Such an aesthetics--a new :frameworkfor the arts-might, as Nelson claims, "deliver us to a more sensitive, perceptive, insightful, enlivened, collaborative and just way of inhabiting the earth." Nelson's shift from art to "inhabiting the earth" might seem to give too much importance to what goes on in galleries, museums, and film festivals.
    [Show full text]
  • Real Worlds: Brassaï Arbus Goldin
    Real Worlds RealWorlds_Guts_Final.indd 1 11/21/17 1:05 PM Real Worlds: Brassaï Arbus Goldin Hilton Als Maggie Nelson A.L. Steiner IN CONVERSATION WITH Lanka Tattersall The Museum of Contemporary Art, Los Angeles RealWorlds_Guts_Final.indd 2-3 11/21/17 1:05 PM CONTENTS 6 Director’s Foreword and Acknowledgments PHILIPPE VERGNE 8 Preface LANKA TATTERSALL LANKA TATTERSALL IN CONVERSATION WITH 13 Hilton Als ON Brassaï 29 Maggie Nelson ON Arbus 45 A.L. Steiner ON Goldin 60 Contributors RealWorlds_Guts_Final.indd 4-5 11/21/17 1:05 PM DIRECTOR’S FOREWORD AND Pelosi, Esquire, Matthew Marks Gallery, and Fraenkel Gallery. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Above all, our heartfelt thanks goes to the estates of Diane Arbus and Brassaï, artist Nan Goldin, and the contributors to this publication: Hilton Als, Maggie Nelson, and A.L. Steiner. Real Worlds: Brassaï, Arbus, Goldin brings together the works Arbus, Brassaï, and Goldin continue to inspire scholars, artists, of three of the twentieth century’s most influential photogra- and viewers alike. Their manifold contributions to the art of the phers of modern life. Drawn primarily from The Museum of last century have fundamentally expanded the definitions of doc- Contemporary Art, Los Angeles’s extraordinary photography umentary photography, while offering simultaneously elegant, collection, the exhibition provides a remarkable opportunity to brutal, and tender depictions of their “Real Worlds,” worlds explore the work of Brassaï (1899–1984), Diane Arbus (1923– that our brilliant contributors—Als, Nelson, and Steiner—have 1971), and Nan Goldin (1953–). generously and keenly explored within this publication. I am This exhibition would not have been possible without the deeply grateful to each for lending their critical voice and vision acquisition, in 1995, of an astounding collection of over two to this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Off Scene.Pdf
    Off Scene published on the occasion of the exhibiton Aliza Shvarts: Off Scene May 11—June 30, 2018 Curated by Sarah Fritchey Artspace New Haven, CT some objects exist as complicated layers of wet sediment and bone, ossified indexes of past event punctuated by a palpable sense of things still happening 01 INTRODUCTION BY SARAH FRITCHEY 03 ALIZA SHVARTS: MATERIAL FICTIONS BY ANGELIQUE SZYMANEK 09 BANNER (YALE DAILY NEWS) 11 ON SABOTAGE 13 CITE / SITE 23 NONCONSENSUAL COLLABORATIONS, 2012-PRESENT NOTES ON A SHARED CONDITION 35 SIBBOLETH 41 POSTERS 43 HOW DOES IT FEEL TO BE A FICTION? NEW YORK VIRUS 47 HOW DOES IT FEEL TO BE A FICTION? BOGOTÁ VIRUS 50 HOW DOES IT FEEL TO BE A FICTION? NEW HAVEN VIRUS 51 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS INTRODUCTION BY SARAH FRITCHEY I checked into a hotel room to write this intro- further feedback. Shvarts’ ordeal became a duction. It’s the first time I’ve been alone over- topic of public debate, and in a follow up ar- night in years, and it feels like anything might ticle, a Yale spokesperson described her work be possible. One man in an elevator called as a “creative fiction.” As her story circulated me sweetheart; another admired my ability nationally and internationally over the inter- to swipe my key card and hit button six be- net, it received hundreds of reader comments. fore missing my floor, he was on twenty-two. This is where the exhibition Aliza Shvarts: Off A young woman held a door for me and I Scene begins, with the question of who has thanked her.
    [Show full text]
  • Embracing Maternal Eroticism: Queer Experiences of Pleasure in Maggie Nelson’S the Argonauts
    Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics, 3(1-2), 08 ISSN: 2542-4920 Embracing Maternal Eroticism: Queer Experiences of Pleasure in Maggie Nelson’s The Argonauts Mollie Ann Kervick 1* Published: September 10, 2019 ABSTRACT In this essay I approach The Argonauts (2015), specifically Nelson’s attention to maternal desire and eroticism through the lens of motherhood studies and matricentric feminism. I argue that The Argonauts provides a compelling contribution to a fairly new, but increasingly pertinent, discourse of empowered mothering. Nelson’s accounts of the erotic experience of mothering, coupled with details of her sexual experiences within and outside of her relationship with her partner, Harry, address what has heretofore been a deep- seated contradiction between the maternal body and sexual and erotic pleasure and desire. Nelson makes space for the consideration of motherhood and the erotic not as antithetical, but deeply entwined realms of experience. By drawing on Audre Lorde’s meditations on the erotic, as well as scholarship on maternal eroticism, I contend that The Argonauts exposes aspects of feminine and maternal experiences that transgress a patriarchal institution of motherhood which ultimately seeks to contain these experiences within the private sphere of the family. Keywords: motherhood, neoliberalism, academic feminisms, mothering, eroticism INTRODUCTION In her genre-defying poetic/critical memoir The Argonauts (2015), Maggie Nelson explores the interstices of sex, mothering, and language in the age of North American neoliberalism. Nelson reflects on her experiences of family- making with her partner, artist Harry Dodge, through her journey of conceiving and giving birth to her son Iggy while learning to care for her stepson at the same time.
    [Show full text]
  • Maggie Nelson's Bluets
    A Strange Connectedness: On the Poetics and Uses of Shame In Contemporary Autobiography D i s s e r t a t i o n zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Doktor der Philosophie in der Philosophischen Fakultät der Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen vorgelegt von Jocelyn Elizabeth Parr aus Otahuhu, New Zealand 2016 Gedruckt mit Genehmigung der Philosophischen Fakultät der Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen Dekan: Prof. Dr. Jürgen Leonhardt Hauptberichterstatter: Prof. Dr. Ingrid Hotz-Davies Mitberichterstatter: Dr. Pascale Amiot (Université de Perpignan) Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 17. Dezember 2014 Universitätsbibliothek Tübingen: TOBIAS-Lib Abstract This dissertation studies the way that shame can be a pharmakon—a toxic affect or an intoxicating form—with as much potential to heal as it has to harm. I argue that shame informs, inspires, and limits contemporary forms of autobiography. I begin and end the dissertation with works of literary criticism that are loosely autobiographical autobiographical. Ann Cvetkovich's Depression: A Public Feeling and Kate Zambreno's Heroines both aim to rebut traditional forms of literary criticism by writing in the form of memoir, thus generating a protective enclave for identities they call ‘minor’ (queer in the case of Cvetkovich, female in the case of Zambreno). Sheila Heti's How Should a Person Be? and Ben Lerner's Leaving the Atocha Station fictionalize their autobiographies thus questioning on both a fictional and a metafictional level whether or not anything—art, in particular—can have meaning. Maggie Nelson’s Bluets traces the shame of heartbreak, depression and longing across two hundred and forty propositions, all of which are in hot pursuit of something blue.
    [Show full text]
  • Episode 82 Maggie Nelson
    Rachel Zucker speaks with Maggie Nelson: Episode 82 of Commonplace RZ: [Intro]: Hello, and welcome to episode eighty-two of Commonplace featuring writer, critic, and professor Maggie Nelson. I'm your host, Rachel Zucker. Many of you listening will have read at least one of Maggie Nelson's incredible books. Some of you no doubt are dedicated fans of Maggie's book Jane or her book The Art of Cruelty: a Reckoning, or The Argonauts, which won the National Book Critics Circle Award in 2015 and was a New York Times Best Seller or her cult classic Bluets published by Wave in 2009 and reissued by Wave in a special 10th anniversary edition last year. Maggie Nelson has won almost all the big prizes: an NEA fellowship, Guggenheim's Creative Capital Award, and the MacArthur, and her books sell. She is widely read and deeply appreciated by poets and scholars and by people who hardly ever read poetry or criticism. There are, of course, many excellent reviews of Maggie's work, fabulous interviews with Maggie wherein she talks about queer theory, feminist theory, the American obsession with violence and missing or murdered white women, art, identity, grief, the New York School poets, pain, pleasure, the color blue. You can find links to a few of our favorite reviews and interviews and to Maggie's books on our website, commonpodcast.com, and in our show notes. For those of you unfamiliar with Maggie's oeuvre, you have many delights ahead of you, including this conversation, which I recorded with Maggie at her office at University of Southern California on October 15th, 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Creative Nonfiction Writers Series
    MA in Critical Studies Spring 2018 Creative NonfictionWriters Series Roberta Hunte Shayla Lawson Jerry McGill Maggie Nelson Walidah Imarisha ¶ January 24 ¶ February 20 ¶ February 27 ¶ March 16 ¶ April 11 MA in Critical Studies Spring 2018 Roberta Hunte Shayla Lawson Jerry McGill Maggie Nelson Walidah Imarisha Wednesday, January 24, 6:30pm Tuesday, February 20, 6pm-9pm Tuesday, February 27, 6-9pm Friday March 16, 6:30pm Wednesday April 11, 6:00pm Creative Mediatheque Bridgelab Room 413 Mediatheque Mediatheque Roberta Hunte will discuss Shayla Lawson will be leading In his book, Dear Marcus, Jerry Poet, scholar, and nonfiction Walidah Imarisha will be Nonfiction her work and screen her film a discussion/workshop on McGill addresses the man who writer Maggie Nelson earned lecturing about her writing and Sista in the Brotherhood. Maggie Nelson’s Bluets (2009). shot him and the result is an a PhD in English literature at research. This event will include Writers inspiring narrative about the the Graduate Center, CUNY. a reception and book signing. Dr. Roberta Hunte is an educator, Shayla Lawson’s work has moments in life that shape Her published writing is often Series facilitator, consultant, and appeared in print & online us—those that catch us by described as genre crossing Walidah Imarisha is an educator, cultural worker. She is an at Tin House, GRAMMA, ESPN, surprise, that blindside us, but or hybrid. Bluets (2009) is writer, public scholar, and Assistant Professor in Black Salon, The Offing, Guernica, present us with opportunities perhaps her most well-known spoken word artist. She edited All events: Pacific Northwest College Of Art Studies and Women, Gender, and Colorado Review, Barrelhouse, for growth, reflection, work mix of scholarship and two anthologies, Octavia’s 511 NW Broadway, Portland Oregon Sexuality Studies at Portland and MiPOesias.
    [Show full text]
  • Maggie Nelson's Many Selves
    LIFE AND LETTERS APRIL 18, 2016 ISSUE IMMEDIATE FAMILY Maggie Nelson’s life in words. By Hilton Als ay 5, 2015: that was when Maggie Nelson’s ninth book,M “The Argonauts,” came out. Published two months after the author turned forty-two, the slim, intense volume, which tells the philosophical, sometimes comic tale of Nelson’s ever- developing consciousness, combines—like a number of other masterpieces of American autobiography—memoir, literary analysis, humor, and reporting with vivid instances of both the familiar and the strange. Central to “The Argonauts” is the story of Nelson’s great love for Harry It’s Nelson’s articulation of her many selves that Dodge, a West Coast sculptor, makes her readers feel hopeful. Photograph by Graeme Mitchell for The New Yorker writer, and video artist who is fuidly gendered. As Nelson embarks on her intellectual and emotional journey, Harry also goes on various excursions in order to become the person he is now, whom Nelson describes, quoting a character from Harry’s 2001 flm, “By Hook or By Crook,” as neither male nor female but “a special—a two for one.” Sara Marcus, in an elegant and concise review of “The Argonauts,” for the Los Angeles Times, notes the way that Nelson circles “away and back again to central questions about deviance and normalcy, family- making and love.” What Nelson is asking, throughout the book, Marcus says, is “How does anyone decide what’s normal and what’s radical? What kinds of experience do we close ourselves of to when we think we already know?” Last month, the book won the 2015 National Book Critics Circle Award for criticism, but long before that it was passed around and praised by any number of readers who knew nothing, or next to nothing, about Nelson’s interest in queerness, let alone lives like the ones her memoir grew out of and embodies.
    [Show full text]
  • Am Ia Bad Feminist? Moments of Reflection and Negotiation In
    AM I A BAD FEMINIST? MOMENTS OF REFLECTION AND NEGOTIATION IN CONTEMPORARY FEMINIST IDENTITY Elizabeth Ryan Brownlow A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY August 2020 Committee: Sandra Faulkner, Committee Chair George Bullerjahn Graduate Faculty Representative Susana Peña Jolie Sheffer ii ABSTRACT Sandra Faulkner, Committee Chair In 2014 Roxane Gay published Bad Feminist, a collection of personal essays written from her position as a Haitian American feminist academic. This work quickly skyrocketed in popularity across both academic and nonacademic audiences. Representative of the increasingly public-facing authoethnographic scholarship of feminist academic women, Gay’s work is a product of its time. For this dissertation, I examine Bad Feminist along with two other also wildly popular autoethnographic works produced in the same decade, Tressie McMillan Cotton’s Thick: And Other Essays and Maggie Nelson’s The Argonauts. I examine these texts as public- facing, accessible works that communicate their academic feminist authors’ feelings of feminist inadequacy in order to address larger issues of feminist practice and theory. Utilizing Sara Ahmed’s theory of becoming feminist, I analyze the “bad feminist moments,” expressed in these texts as moments of feminist crisis to identify what causes them and what functions they might serve. Using qualitative methodological triangulation, better known as mixed-methods research, I employ topic modeling and content analysis across all three texts to identify patterns that reveal not only why and how academic feminists might feel like they are bad feminists, but how and why they choose to share the moments in which they feel like bad feminists with others.
    [Show full text]
  • 5F5c6e7b6b960dcb427b33ea17
    WAVE BOOKS SEATTLE AND NEW YORK MAGGIE NELS ON BLUETS PUBLISHED BY WAVE BOOKS WWW . WAVEPOETRY.COM COPYRIGHT© 2009 BY MAGGIE NELSON ALL RIGHTS RESERVED WAVE BOOKS TITLES ARE DISTRIBUTED TO THE TRADE BY CONSORTIUM BOOK SALES AND DISTRIBUTION PHONE: 8oo 283 3572 I SAN 631 76ox THIS TITLE IS AVAILABLE IN LIMITED EDITION HARDCOVER DIRECTLY FROM THE PUBLISHER LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOGING-IN PUBLICATION DATA NELSON, MAGGIE, 1973 BLUETS I MAGGIE NELSON. 1ST ED. P. CM. ISBN 978-1 933517 40-7 (PBK. ALK. PAPER ) I. TITLE. PS3564.E4687B56 2009 8n'.54 Dc22 2009005830 DESIGNED AND COMPOSED BY QUEMADURA PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 FIRST EDITION WAVE BOOKS 020 And were it trne, we do not think all philosophy is worth one hour of pain. PAscAL, Pensees 1. Suppose I were to begin by saying that I had fallen in love with a color. Suppose I were to speak this as though it were a confession; suppose I shredded my napkin as we spoke. It began slowly. An appreciation, an affinity. Then, one day, it became more serious. Then (looking into an empty teacup, its bottom stained with thin brown excre­ ment coiled into the shape of a sea horse) it became some­ how personal. 2. And so I fell in love with a color-in this case, the color blue-as if falling under a spell, a spell I fought to stay un­ der and get out from under, in turns. BLU ETS 3· Well, and what of it? A voluntary delusion, you might say.
    [Show full text]