Evelyn Waugh Newsletter and Stud
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
EVELYN WAUGH NEWSLETTER AND STUD EVELYN WAUGH NEWSLETTER AND STUDIES Vol. 40, No. 2 Autumn 2009 Court of Inquiry: Additional Waugh Bibliography by Donat Gallagher James Cook University Bibliographers have overlooked a review-with-reminiscences that contains intriguing information about Waugh's being the subject of a military Court of Inquiry: viz. Bernard Fergusson’s "Gentlemen at Arms,” a review of To the War with Waugh, by John St John, Sunday Times, 6 May 1973: 40. When Brigadier Fergusson became Military Director of Combined Operations in 1945, he came across "a Court of Inquiry into Evelyn's behaviour on a [training] manoeuvre in England some years before." Waugh had been accused by an umpire of "smoking a cigar and drinking claret in a house while the 'battle' was in full swing. He had denied both charges indignantly, but conceded in the end that he had been smoking a cheroot and drinking Burgundy." In the second volume of his biography, Martin Stannard describes Waugh, then the Intelligence Officer of a Royal Marine battalion, acting as "chief umpire" in a practice landing at Scapa Bay and "tramping about disconsolately … with no orders other than to follow Battalion HQ." This passage misreads Waugh's Diaries. Stannard conflates two distinct exercises: the first was a Battalion exercise on 28 August 1940, in which Waugh had a leading role as "chief umpire"; the second was a Brigade exercise on 30 August 1940, in which Waugh had no part. In fact, he "trotted along” with various other guests, having “seen no orders” and knowing “little of our objectives.” Stannard had read Fergusson’s review and was aware of a batman’s revelation that he had carried in his haversack to an exercise bottles of wine for Waugh. Concluding that Waugh took "excellent red wine" with him and was "discovered quietly toping in the safety of a house" during the Scapa Bay exercise, Stannard goes on to say that the matter "was eventually raised at a Court of Inquiry in 1945" (Evelyn Waugh: The Later Years 1939-1966, New York: Norton, 1992, 16-17). Clearly this is a misreading of Fergusson, who says that the Inquiry had taken place "some years before" he found a record of it in 1945. Carping aside, Stannard quite reasonably placed the wine-cigar-house incident that led to the Court of Inquiry within the Scapa Bay exercise. Nevertheless, I would like to suggest another possibility, because Scapa Bay took place the day before the Marines sailed on the Dakar expedition, and because the actual time spent exercising ashore was quite short—4.15 am to 6.00 am—which gave little opportunity for silly games. When Lord Lovat was engineering Waugh's forced resignation from the Special Service Brigade in 1943, he told the Vice Chief of Combined Operations, General Charles Haydon, that Waugh had been "sent home for misconduct from an Exercise." If this were true, it would be a serious blot on Waugh’s copybook. In his memorandum to Lord Louis Mountbatten seeking an inquiry into his dismissal, Waugh protested that he had "only once in my life been given a bad report on an Exercise; this was exercise 'ALBION' commanded by Lt.-Col. Shaw." He attached a letter from Lt.-Col. Shaw making it clear that Waugh had not been sent home from the exercise. It would be useful to know more about Lt.-Col. Shaw and exercise “ALBION.” In the absence of that information, one can only suggest that the exercise during which Waugh was discovered smoking and drinking was “ALBION,” commanded by Lt.-Col. Shaw. On Waugh’s own admission, this exercise led to his being given a "bad report." And if, as he claims, this was the only “bad report” he received, then it seems very likely that “ALBION,” not Scapa Bay, saw the misconduct that occasioned a Court of Inquiry. file:////uol.le.ac.uk/...c144/My%20Documents/Evelyn%20Waugh/Evelyn%20Waugh%20Studies/Newsletters/Newsletters/Newsletter_40.2.htm[04/12/2013 14:44:37] EVELYN WAUGH NEWSLETTER AND STUD Ambrose Silk, The Yellow Book, and The Ivory Tower: Influence and Jamesian Aesthetics in Put Out More Flags by Allan Johnson Contemporary reviews of Waugh’s Put Out More Flags were hesitant to attribute to Ambrose Silk any role greater than that of buffoon. Kate O’Brien’s review in the Spectator, 3 April 1942, writes Ambrose off with one sentence: ‘And there is a new character, a whining pansy called Ambrose Silk, who has an absurd adventure.’[1] Alan Pryce-Jones made no mention at all of Ambrose in his 11 April 1942 review in the New Statesman.[2] Yet perhaps Ambrose is not to blame for this critical underestimation. The 1942 novel can be read as an apprehensive stylistic transition between Waugh’s early satirical technique and later eschatological mode, and if any middle style exists in Waugh’s corpus, POMF is one of few examples. There can be little surprise that Basil Seal, the more stylistically robust persona, has been customarily seen as the central concern of the narrative. But in undervaluing the parallel story, that of Ambrose Silk and his hopeless attempt to produce a re-imagined Yellow Book for mid-century, Waugh’s narrative is rendered as a wartime comedy of billeting and roguery. There can be no mistake that Ambrose’s Ivory Tower has been conceived as a double of its most obvious source, Henry Harland and Aubrey Beardsley’s infamous 1890s journal of decadence, The Yellow Book. Waugh alludes to the short-lived journal throughout his portrayal of Ambrose’s project: "The Café Royal, perhaps because of its distant associations with Oscar and Aubrey, was one of the places where Ambrose preened himself, spread his feathers and felt free to take wing. He had left his persecution mania downstairs with his hat and umbrella. He defied the universe."[3] Among Waugh’s dandy-aesthete figures, Ambrose is unusually self- conscious and insecure, but the lingering appeal of Wilde and Beardsley assuage his self- loathing. However, he is often hostile to the literature of the Yellow Nineties. When his publisher suggests that the Ivory Tower will be ‘a kind of new Yellow Book,’ Ambrose becomes upset. ‘Geoffrey,’ he whines, ‘How can you be so unkind?’ (POMF 111). Later, though, Ambrose is more resigned: ‘I wasn’t thinking of having advertisements. I thought of making it something like the old Yellow Book.’ 'Well, that was a failure,' said old Rampole triumphantly, ‘in the end.’ (POMF 184-85) Ambrose’s efforts to restore a decidedly late-Victorian aestheticism to English culture through publication of his Ivory Tower is obstructed by the loutish and shrewd Basil, who encourages Ambrose to make a large cut in the proofs. Conveniently for Basil, the cut turns the piece into pro-Nazi propaganda. Although his Ivory Tower is interpreted as political and social discourse disguised as a literary magazine, Ambrose’s political statements merely provide an excuse for the true centerpiece of the magazine, the fifty-page story called ‘Monument to a Spartan’ which ‘with great delicacy and precision’ memorializes Ambrose’s German lover, Hans, now imprisoned in a German concentration camp: ‘Monument to a Spartan’ described Hans, as Ambrose had loved him, in every mood; Hans immature, the provincial petit-bourgeois youth floundering and groping in the gloom of Teutonic adolescence, unsuccessful in his examinations, world- weary, brooding about suicide among the conifers, uncritical of direct authority, unreconciled to the order of the universe; Hans affectionate, sentimental, roughly sensual, guilty; above all Hans guilty, haunted by the taboos of the forest; Hans credulous, giving his simple and generous acceptance to all the nonsense of Nazi leaders; Hans reverent to those absurd instructors who harangued the youth camps, file:////uol.le.ac.uk/...c144/My%20Documents/Evelyn%20Waugh/Evelyn%20Waugh%20Studies/Newsletters/Newsletters/Newsletter_40.2.htm[04/12/2013 14:44:37] EVELYN WAUGH NEWSLETTER AND STUD resentful at the injustices of man to man, at the plots of the Jews and the encirclement of his country…. (POMF 186-87) I read this précis of ‘Monument to a Spartan’ as a fascinating response to an earlier detail: while at Oxford, Ambrose recited Tennyson’s In Memoriam through a megaphone ‘to an accompaniment hummed on combs and tissue paper’ (POMF 43).[4] His recitation of Tennyson’s elegy to Arthur Henry Hallam anticipates his later elegy to Hans. Although we are led to believe that ‘Monument to a Spartan’ is a highly successful, carefully conceived work, Ambrose is persuaded by Basil to cut the ending of the story and contentiously leave ‘Hans still full of illusions, marching into Poland,’ so the story becomes a triumphant celebration of German military power (POMF 191). Basil has been promised a promotion for catching a collaborator. Clearly Basil’s control over the text, his influence over aesthetic history, instigates Ambrose’s decline and fall. Tennyson’s poem ends not with a military march, but with a tender appeal to God. When Ambrose’s story is cut short, not allowed to reach a gentle conclusion, he is left with no choice other than to flee the country to avoid arrest. There is, however, a further significant influence—that of Henry James. It is commonly believed that Waugh did not begin reading James until after the Second World War, and the first mention of James in Waugh’s diaries comes in October 1946.[5] On 17 November 1946, Waugh wrote, ‘What an enormous, uncovenanted blessing to have kept Henry James for middle age’ (Diaries 663). This fascination with James continued, for in June of the following year, Waugh records a Monday evening that included ‘a glass of burgundy, fruit juice and soda and a story by Henry James’ (Diaries 680).