Major League Team Sports

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Major League Team Sports DIVISION OF THE HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY PASADENA, CALIFORNIA 91125 MAJOR LEAGUE TEAM SPORTS u..C, '1\lUTE OF Roger G. Noll ''"' �... /'�� � 1J � .....� 0 � Q � tit � �..-'\ Prepared for public�tion in Walter Adams, editor "ti-� -4..ii> The Structure of American Industry (Sixth Edition) "1S HALL fit\��\. SOCIAL SCIENCE WORKING PAPER 125 May 1976 Revised November 1980 MA.JOR LEAGUE TEAM SPORTS Roger G. Noll* The maj or league sports industry is an exceptionally interesting subject for economic study . Its allure for economists does not lie in its size, for by any reasonable measure the team sports industry is not big business. The total revenue of all teams in the five major team sports--baseball, basketball, football, hockey, and soccer�is less than half the revenue of such mundane endeavors as the manufacture of cardboard boxes or the canning of fruits and vegetables. Pro teams have revenues ranging approximately from those of a large gas station to tho se of a department store or large supermarket. The team sports business is interesting to economists primarily because of the complex operating rules and special legal status of the industry . Nearly every phase of the operations of a team or a league is influenced by practices and rules that limit economic competition within the industry . In mo st cases, government has either sanctioned or failed to attack effectively these anticompetitive practices. Consequently, professional team sports * Chairman of the Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences and Professor of Economics at the California Institute of Technology . 2 3 provides economists with a unique opportunity to study the operation Superficially, the structure of the player market appears and performance of an effective, well-organized cartel . competitive. In each sport, twenty-five to thirty firms all employ approximately equal numbers of athletes; concentration ratios on the THE MARKET STRU CTURE OF MAJOR LEAGUE SPORTS demand side of these markets are therefore quite low. On the supply As do most businesses, a sports team operates in several side, a tiny proportion of the population is skillful enough to play markets, some of which are local and some of which are national. The ma jor league athletics, and only a handful have the ability to become mo st important product markets are the sale of admissions and stars . Still in any year the number of, say, .300 hitters in baseball concessions at home contests and the sale of the right to broadcast or 50-yards-per-game running backs in football is sufficiently play-by-play accounts of games. The mo st important input markets are numerous that the market is likely to be reasonably competitive. the acquisition of skilled professional players and of a facility for Despite these appearances, the player market is not staging contests. The characteristics of each of these four markets competitive. Although the details differ from sport to sport, are somewhat different , so that each must be examined separately. In professional sports leagues all have some version of a "p layer general , although 122 minor league teams operated in the five sports reservation system"--a mechanism for reducing the competition for in 1980, rarely would more than a few find themselves competing in a players among teams in the league . particular market. Leagues have separate rules for regulating competition for three types of players : "rookies," players about to begin a The Player Market professional career; veterans whose present team desires to retain Although a few especially gifted athletes can play at the their services ; and veterans who are no longer wanted by their current highest professional level in more than one sport, such individuals employer . The effect of all three systems is to divide as many are extremely rare. Consequently , each sport has essentially a players as possible from the relevant pool of present and potential separate player market through which teams acquire athletes with major league players into separate submarkets--one for each team-- in skills specific to that sport. All teams conduct international which each team has an exclusive bargaining right with the players searches for players. Even the uniquely American game of football has assigned to its submarket. engaged in an international search for talent since the 1960s when it The method for allocating exclusive bargaining rights for found a productive use for European soccer players as place kickers. rookies is the free agent draft. In every sport at a specified time during the year--typically at the conclusion of the high school and 4 5 college season in the same sport�teams in each league, normally in formula that is negotiated with the players' association. The reverse order of finish during the previous season, select players compensation is the assignment of rights to draft choices, with the from among eligible amateur athletes to be added to their "reserve amount of compensation determined by the experience and playing time list." A player may then negotiate only with the team that selected of the player who plays out his option. In basketball through 1981 him, and in all sports except baseball rights to negotiate with the and hockey, the amount of compensation is determined by the player perpetually belong to the selecting team unless it trades or Commissioner of the sport. Although few cases have arisen in these sells those rights to another member of the league . In baseball, if a sports, the 1979 Bill Walton case illustrates the use of the player does not sign a contract with the team that drafted him within compensation system to punish severely teams that sign a free agent . six months his name returns to the list of athletes eligible for the NBA Commissioner Larry O'Brien awarded Walton's old team, the Portland draft. Trail Blazers, several key players from San Diego , the team that In all sports a veteran player has some freedom to change signed him, even though Walton' s ability to play, owing to a foot teams even if his current emp loyer wants to retain the rights to his injury , was highly questionable (indeed, Walton played only a few services . This is done by exercising the "option" to "play out" his games for San Diego , and his career remains in jeopardy) . contract and become a "free agent ." What this means is that a player The compensation requirement--called the "Rozelle Rule" after can gain his freedom to negotiate with another team by playing an its inventor, Commissioner Pete Rozelle of the National Football additional year in baseball, football and basketball, an additional League--reduces the amount a team is willing to pay a player who has two years in soccer, or an additional three years in hockey under played out his option, and thereby the wage that he will obtain in the terms specified in his last contract. In baseball, a player mu st also competition for his services. As of 1980 , baseball and soccer had no have six years of experience to be eligible for free agency . compensation rule; however , in collective bargaining , baseball owners After playing out his option, a player is not completely are trying to obtain it. In basketball, the compensation system ends unencumbered in his ability to negotiate a job with a different in 1981 unless the players agree to extend it as part of the employer. In football and hockey, and in basketball through 1981 , the collective bargaining agreement . In basketball, all that is scheduled team that signs the player who has played out his option mu st to remain after 1981 is the right of a player's team to keep him by indemnify the team that he left with some combination of players, matching the offer he receives from a competitor. In baseball, the draft choices and cash that compensates his old team for its loss due only factors now limiting competition for veteran free agents in to his departure. In football, compensation is determined by a baseball are that only twelve teams are allowed to compete for any 6 7 given player, and that each team is limited in the number of free The average salary for the entire team, including second line players , agents that it can sign. Both rules have proven to be too lax to be was well over $200 ,000 . All of the starting lineup of the Phillies effective in limiting significantly the salaries of players. are veteran players who either have gone through the free agent Even the limited freedom of veterans to switch teams is a process or who have been induced to stay out of the free agent process relatively recent event. In the early days of team sports, the rights by the Phillies because of lucrative contract offers. The obvious to a player were perpetual . Once a player signed his first contract , affect of the free agency system in baseball has been a dramatic the rights to negotiate with him were thereafter the exclusive increase in the pay of veteran players. The player market monopsony property of a single team as long as the terms of his contract were in baseball is now confined to players in the first few years of their satisfied. This situation changed in the mid-1 970s in all sports, careers. Of course, because the median duration of a baseball career largely because of efforts of players' unions through antitrust is about five years, it is still true that the maj ority of players actions and collective bargaining , a topic to which we will return never have the opportunity to enter a competitive player market . The later . primary beneficiaries of the free agent system are the star players The effects of baseball's relatively liberal system of free who enjoy long careers.
Recommended publications
  • Bin \Ixon Visits New York for Drug Abuse Fight
    Bin SEE STORY PAGE 15 Sonny Sanay and cool today, fair Y Red Bank, Freehold / FINAL tonight. Tomorrow partly cloudy and milder. / Long Branch J EDITION 26 PAGES ^lunmouih County's Outstanding Home Xowspapor KED BANK, N.J. MONDAY, MARCH 20,1972 TEN CENTS Be Spared Income Tax Audits By The Associated Press Jr,, jdjre.ciorj)f the IRS for payers appear at district of- adjustable gross income. The any refund the taxpayer may Nash estimates that 25,000 miles or 9 cents per mile over New Jersey. "It- is called the fices for audit interviews," taxpayer forgets to subtract have claimed on his return," Jerseyans will be contacted 15,000 miles. Thousands of Jorseyans will unallowable items program." Nash said yesterday. "Also, if the 3 per cent. This is not an said Nash. "A proposed cor- under the new system. —Expenses for care of chil- be spared the. pain of personal Certain .unallowable items unallowable items are cor- arguable item. The law says rection will be sent to the tax- He listed these examples of dren or certain disabled de- tax audits this year. , on federal individual - income rected before April 17, tax- you must reduce the medical payer by mail. If the taxpayer unallowable items which will pendents on a married person The Internal'Revenue ser> tax returns will be identified payers will not be subject to deduction by 3 per cent of does not agree with the pro- be corrected at the IRS cen- filing a separate return. There vice has started a "return and corrected in IRS service interest charges.
    [Show full text]
  • USA Basketball Men's Pan American Games Media Guide Table Of
    2015 Men’s Pan American Games Team Training Camp Media Guide Colorado Springs, Colorado • July 7-12, 2015 2015 USA Men’s Pan American Games 2015 USA Men’s Pan American Games Team Training Schedule Team Training Camp Staffing Tuesday, July 7 5-7 p.m. MDT Practice at USOTC Sports Center II 2015 USA Pan American Games Team Staff Head Coach: Mark Few, Gonzaga University July 8 Assistant Coach: Tad Boyle, University of Colorado 9-11 a.m. MDT Practice at USOTC Sports Center II Assistant Coach: Mike Brown 5-7 p.m. MDT Practice at USOTC Sports Center II Athletic Trainer: Rawley Klingsmith, University of Colorado Team Physician: Steve Foley, Samford Health July 9 8:30-10 a.m. MDT Practice at USOTC Sports Center II 2015 USA Pan American Games 5-7 p.m. MDT Practice at USOTC Sports Center II Training Camp Court Coaches Jason Flanigan, Holmes Community College (Miss.) July 10 Ron Hunter, Georgia State University 9-11 a.m. MDT Practice at USOTC Sports Center II Mark Turgeon, University of Maryland 5-7 p.m. MDT Practice at USOTC Sports Center II July 11 2015 USA Pan American Games 9-11 a.m. MDT Practice at USOTC Sports Center II Training Camp Support Staff 5-7 p.m. MDT Practice at USOTC Sports Center II Michael Brooks, University of Louisville July 12 Julian Mills, Colorado Springs, Colorado 9-11 a.m. MDT Practice at USOTC Sports Center II Will Thoni, Davidson College 5-7 p.m. MDT Practice at USOTC Sports Center II USA Men’s Junior National Team Committee July 13 Chair: Jim Boeheim, Syracuse University NCAA Appointee: Bob McKillop, Davidson College 6-8 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Steroid Use in Sports, Part Ii: Examining the National Football League’S Policy on Anabolic Steroids and Related Sub- Stances
    STEROID USE IN SPORTS, PART II: EXAMINING THE NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE’S POLICY ON ANABOLIC STEROIDS AND RELATED SUB- STANCES HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED NINTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION APRIL 27, 2005 Serial No. 109–21 Printed for the use of the Committee on Government Reform ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpo.gov/congress/house http://www.house.gov/reform U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 21–242 PDF WASHINGTON : 2005 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 11-MAY-2000 11:42 Jun 28, 2005 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 D:\DOCS\21242.TXT HGOVREF1 PsN: HGOVREF1 COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM TOM DAVIS, Virginia, Chairman CHRISTOPHER SHAYS, Connecticut HENRY A. WAXMAN, California DAN BURTON, Indiana TOM LANTOS, California ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN, Florida MAJOR R. OWENS, New York JOHN M. MCHUGH, New York EDOLPHUS TOWNS, New York JOHN L. MICA, Florida PAUL E. KANJORSKI, Pennsylvania GIL GUTKNECHT, Minnesota CAROLYN B. MALONEY, New York MARK E. SOUDER, Indiana ELIJAH E. CUMMINGS, Maryland STEVEN C. LATOURETTE, Ohio DENNIS J. KUCINICH, Ohio TODD RUSSELL PLATTS, Pennsylvania DANNY K. DAVIS, Illinois CHRIS CANNON, Utah WM. LACY CLAY, Missouri JOHN J. DUNCAN, JR., Tennessee DIANE E. WATSON, California CANDICE S. MILLER, Michigan STEPHEN F. LYNCH, Massachusetts MICHAEL R. TURNER, Ohio CHRIS VAN HOLLEN, Maryland DARRELL E. ISSA, California LINDA T.
    [Show full text]
  • Cavaliers Game Notes Follow @Cavsnotes on Twitter Semifinals - Game 2 Overall Playoff Game # 9 Road Game # 5
    THUR., MAY 3, 2018 AIR CANADA CENTRE – TORONTO, ON TV: ESPN RADIO: WTAM 1100/LA MEGA 87.7 FM/ESPN RADIO 6:00 PM ET (CAVS LEAD SERIES 1-0) CLEVELAND CAVALIERS GAME NOTES FOLLOW @CAVSNOTES ON TWITTER SEMIFINALS - GAME 2 OVERALL PLAYOFF GAME # 9 ROAD GAME # 5 LAST GAME’S STARTERS POS NO. PLAYER HT. WT. G GS PPG RPG APG FG% MPG F 5 J.R. SMITH 6-6 225 17-18: 80 61 8.3 2.9 1.8 .403 28.1 QUARTERFINALS PLAYOFFS: 8 7 10.0 2.8 1.1 .351 33.2 # 4 Cleveland vs. # 5 Indiana F 23 LEBRON JAMES 6-8 250 17-18: 82 82 27.5 8.6 9.1 .542 36.9 CAVS won series 4-3 PLAYOFFS: 8 8 33.4 10.3 8.4 .528 41.9 Game 1 at Cleveland; April 15 C 0 KEVIN LOVE 6-10 251 17-18: 59 59 17.6 9.3 1.7 .458 28.0 Pacers 98, CAVS 80 PLAYOFFS: 8 8 10.9 9.8 1.1 .323 32.9 Game 2 at Cleveland; April 18 G 26 KYLE KORVER 6-7 212 17-18: 73 4 9.2 2.3 1.2 .459 21.6 CAVS 100, Pacers 97 PLAYOFFS: 8 7 9.6 2.6 0.9 .387 24.8 Game 3 at Indiana; April 20 Pacers 92, CAVS 90 G 3 GEORGE HILL 6-3 188 17-18: 67 60 10.0 2.7 2.8 .460 27.0 PLAYOFFS: 5 4 8.2 2.0 2.2 .462 21.9 Game 4 at Indiana; April 22 CAVS 104, Pacers 100 CAVS QUICK FACTS Game 5 at Cleveland; April 25 CAVS 98, Pacers 95 • The Cleveland Cavaliers will try to take a 2-0 lead in their Eastern Conference Semifinals series against the Toronto Raptors.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010-11 NCAA Men's Basketball Records
    Award Winners Division I Consensus All-America Selections .................................................... 2 Division I Academic All-Americans By Team ........................................................ 8 Division I Player of the Year ..................... 10 Divisions II and III Players of the Year ................................................... 12 Divisions II and III First-Team All-Americans By Team .......................... 13 Divisions II and III Academic All-Americans By Team .......................... 15 NCAA Postgraduate Scholarship Winners By Team ...................................... 16 2 Division I Consensus All-America Selections Division I Consensus All-America Selections 1917 1930 By Season Clyde Alwood, Illinois; Cyril Haas, Princeton; George Charley Hyatt, Pittsburgh; Branch McCracken, Indiana; Hjelte, California; Orson Kinney, Yale; Harold Olsen, Charles Murphy, Purdue; John Thompson, Montana 1905 Wisconsin; F.I. Reynolds, Kansas St.; Francis Stadsvold, St.; Frank Ward, Montana St.; John Wooden, Purdue. Oliver deGray Vanderbilt, Princeton; Harry Fisher, Minnesota; Charles Taft, Yale; Ray Woods, Illinois; Harry Young, Wash. & Lee. 1931 Columbia; Marcus Hurley, Columbia; Willard Hyatt, Wes Fesler, Ohio St.; George Gregory, Columbia; Joe Yale; Gilmore Kinney, Yale; C.D. McLees, Wisconsin; 1918 Reiff, Northwestern; Elwood Romney, BYU; John James Ozanne, Chicago; Walter Runge, Colgate; Chris Earl Anderson, Illinois; William Chandler, Wisconsin; Wooden, Purdue. Steinmetz, Wisconsin; George Tuck, Minnesota. Harold
    [Show full text]
  • MEDIA INFORMATION Media Information
    MEDIA INFORMATION Media Information Cavaliers guard Collin Sexton talks to a reporter following a 115-112 overtime win in Detroit on January 9, 2020. Fred Mcleod TV Studio & Fred McLeod TV Studio & Media Workroom Media Workroom The Cavaliers organization named the combined television studio and media workroom space at Rocket Mortgage FieldHouse the “Fred McLeod TV Studio & Media Workroom” on September 18, 2019 in honor of the team’s beloved 14-year play-by-play television announcer, who passed away unexpectedly on September 9, 2019. Given the indelible impact and legacy of Fred McLeod, and how he touched so many across the media and fan community, as well as the team he loved, the Fred McLeod TV Studio & Media Workroom serves as a lasting tribute to someone that was universally admired, respected and appreciated as a fellow media member and willing mentor to a countless number across the industry. Before and after every Cavaliers home game, home and visiting team media members gather in the television studio and media workroom space on the event level of Rocket Mortgage FieldHouse to hear from, and interview, the Cavaliers head coach. The space is also used for many other media events and reporting elements throughout the year by attending media covering games and events for newspapers, magazines, television, radio, websites and other digital platforms, as they write and file their respective stories and coverage inside the walls of this important area. A Strongsville, Ohio native, Fred served as the television voice of the Cavs since joining the team and FOX Sports Ohio in 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Letting Time Serve You: Boot Camps and Alternative
    LEAGUE STRUCTURE & STADIUM RENT-SEEKING—THE ROLE OF ANTITRUST REVISITED David Haddock, Tonja Jacobi & Matthew Sag* ―O wad some Power the giftie gie us‖† Abstract Professional North American sporting teams receive enormous public funding for new and renovated stadiums after threatening to depart their hometowns, or by actually moving elsewhere. In contrast, English sporting teams neither receive much public money for such projects, nor move towns. This Article argues that no inherent cultural or political transatlantic variations cause the differences; rather, it is the industrial organization of sports in the two countries—the structure of league control—that enables rent-seeking by American teams but not by their English counterparts. Cross-country time series data contrasting American professional football and baseball stadiums with English soccer grounds support our claim, as does data contrasting the stadiums of geographically flexible National Football League teams with those of functionally immobile major collegiate football teams. North American sports leagues are cartels: they control entry of teams, then collaborate to maximize effective rent-seeking, stave off competition, and keep prices high. In most of the world, competitive merit determines entrance into leagues via a system known as promotion and relegation, which demotes the worst performing teams in one competitive tier to the next lower tier at season‘s end, simultaneously promoting an equivalent number of top teams from the division below. The fluidity created by promotion and relegation severely undermines the credibility of a team‘s threat to leave town by creating alternative, less costly entry points into the league. Open entry * Professor, Northwestern University School of Law & Department of Economics; Professor, Northwestern University School of Law; Associate Professor, Loyola University Chicago and Visiting Fellow at Northwestern‘s Searle Center on Law, Regulation, and Economic Growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Cleveland Cavaliers
    CLEVELAND CAVALIERS (22-50) END OF SEASON GAME NOTES MAY 17, 2021 ROCKET MORTGAGE FIELDHOUSE – CLEVELAND, OH 2020-21 CLEVELAND CAVALIERS GAME NOTES FOLLOW @CAVSNOTES ON TWITTER LAST GAME STARTERS 2020-21 REG. SEASON SCHEDULE PLAYER / 2020-21 REGULAR SEASON AVERAGES DATE OPPONENT SCORE RECORD #31 Jarrett Allen C • 6-11 • 248 • Texas/USA • 4th Season 12/23 vs. Hornets 121-114 W 1-0 GP/GS PPG RPG APG SPG BPG MPG 12/26 @ Pistons 128-119** W 2-0 63/45 12.8 10.0 1.7 0.5 1.4 29.6 12/27 vs. 76ers 118-94 W 3-0 #32 Dean Wade F • 6-9 • 219 • Kansas State • 2nd Season 12/29 vs. Knicks 86-95 L 3-1 GP/GS PPG RPG APG SPG BPG MPG 3-2 63/19 6.0 3.4 1.2 0.6 0.3 19.2 12/31 @ Pacers 99-119 L 1/2 @ Hawks 96-91 W 4-2 #16 Cedi Osman F • 6-7 • 230 • Anadolu Efes (Turkey) • 4th Season 4-3 GP/GS PPG RPG APG SPG BPG MPG 1/4 @ Magic 83-103 L 59/26 10.4 3.4 2.9 0.9 0.2 25.6 1/6 @ Magic 94-105 L 4-4 #35 Isaac Okoro G • 6-6 • 225 • Auburn • Rookie 1/7 @ Grizzlies 94-90 W 5-4 GP/GS PPG RPG APG SPG BPG MPG 1/9 @ Bucks 90-100 L 5-5 67/67 9.6 3.1 1.9 0.9 0.4 32.4 1/11 vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Selected Governance and Operations Issues at Minnesota Sports Facilities
    O L A Comparison of Selected Governance and Operations Issues at Minnesota Sports Facilities Special Review July 26, 2017 Office of the Legislative Auditor OFFICE OF THE LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR CENTENNIAL OFFICE BUILDING – SUITE 140 State of Minnesota 658 CEDAR STREET – SAINT PAUL, MN 55155 State of Minnesota Office of the Legislative Auditor Special Reviews We call this—and other reviews—“special” when they were not part of our regular schedule of audits and evaluations. We typically conduct a special review in response to an allegation that a person or organization has not used public resources in compliance with state law. While the focus of a special review is more narrow than an audit or evaluation, our objective is the same: to find the facts and report them accurately and objectively. We accept allegations from anyone, and we can keep the source confidential. For more information about the Office of the Legislative Auditor, go to our website at: www.auditor.leg.state.mn.us For more information about OLA and to access its reports, go to: www.auditor.leg.state.mn.us. To offer comments about our work or suggest an audit, evaluation, or special review, call 651-296-4708 or email [email protected]. To obtain printed copies of our reports or to obtain reports in electronic ASCII text, Braille, large print, or audio, call 651-296-4708. People with hearing or speech disabilities may call through Minnesota Relay by dialing 7-1-1 or 1-800-627-3529. Photo provided by the Minnesota Department of Administration with recolorization done by OLA.
    [Show full text]
  • An Alternate Justification for Public Investment in Major Sport Facilities?
    Managing Leisure, 2014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13606719.2014.885712 Proximate development: an alternate justification for public investment in major sport facilities? John L. Crompton Department of Recreation, Park and Tourism Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA As skepticism has grown toward the purported economic impact of major sport facilities on a commu- nity, advocates have redirected their justification toward the proximate structural development they stimulate and the social capital emanating from their presence. Analyses in this paper are confined to returns on investment in sport facilities from proximate structural development. Advocates invari- ably claim such benefits will accrue, but frequently they do not. Based on a review of multiple cases, it is suggested that at the city level an acceptable return is dependent on there being a critical mass of complementary attractions, while at the regional level the requirement is a critical mass of businesses that “feed off” the sport facilities. In the context of mega events, the return may be in the form of environmental rehabilitation, a legacy of long-term usable facilities, or “fast-tracked” infra- structure improvements. In all contexts, success is dependent on the extent to which the sport pro- jects are part of a holistic plan. The challenge of stimulating proximate development is exacerbated by the private facility operators’ goal of capturing all discretionary spending by visitors to their facilities and minimizing visitor spending outside their facility.
    [Show full text]
  • THE COFFIN CORNER: Vol
    Vol. 29, No. 3 2007 PFRA-ternizing Writing Awards 2 AAFC vs NFL: The Attendance Battle 3 Howard “Cub” Buck 8 Differential Scores 10 The Two and Only 12 Wilbur & Orville for the HOF 13 Ozzie Newsome - 3 16 Ozzie Newsome - 2 15 Bosh Pritchard 19 PFRA Committees 20 Pro Football Lore 22 Fred BILETNIKOFF Classifieds 24 THE COFFIN CORNER: Vol. 29, No. 3 (2007) PFRA-ternizing PAST WRITING AWARD WINNERS THE 2006 PFRA WRITING AWARDS 2005 We are happy to report that once more each Pre-1960 Andy Piascik – Why the AAFC Browns Were the nominee for a PFRA Writing Award received Best Team in Football 1946-49; World War II and votes. We believe that proves both the quality the Hall of Fame Winning Percentages Post-1960 Mark L. Ford & Massimo Foglio – The First NFL of the articles and the variation in readers’ Europe interests. Personality Chris Willis – Wilbur Henry; Don Hutson; Gale Sayers The winners: 2004 Pre-1960 Roy Sye – Kenosha aroons 1924 PRE 1960: Post-1960 Tim Brulis – Post-Season Football Annoucers 1. Tom Benjey: “Birth of Modern Football” 1948-2003; Chronology of Pro Football on TV 2. Joel Bussert :”Pro Bowl Teams of the Fifties” Personality Jim Sargent – Ron Kramer; Al Dorow; Jerry Groom; Walt Kowalczyk POST 1960: 1. Ed Gruver: “When Eagles Dared” 2003 Pre-1960 John Hogrogian – 1939 College All-Star Game 2. Coach Troup: “J.D. Smith and the 1961 49ers” Post-1960 Doug Warren – Lions, Bears, and the First PERSONALITY: Thanksgiving Personality Jeff Miller – Ben Lee Boynton; Jim Kendrick; Sam 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019-20 Cleveland Cavaliers Game Notes Follow @Cavsnotes on Twitter Preseason Game # 4 Cavs Quick Facts Cavaliers Injur
    TUES., OCT. 15, 2019 ROCKET MORTGAGE FIELDHOUSE – CLEVELAND, OH 7:00 PM ET TV: FSO RADIO: WTAM 1100 AM/LA MEGA 87.7 FM 2019-20 CLEVELAND CAVALIERS GAME NOTES FOLLOW @CAVSNOTES ON TWITTER PRESEASON GAME # 4 LAST GAME’S STARTERS 2019-20 SCHEDULE 10/7 vs. SLA (PRE) W, 120-89 POS NO. PLAYER HT. WT. G GS PPG RPG APG FG% MPG 10/11 @ DET (PRE) L, 105-109 10/13 @ BOS (PRE) L, 72-118 F 16 CEDI OSMAN 6-7 230 18-19: 76 75 13.0 4.7 2.6 .427 32.2 10/15 vs. BOS (PRE) 7:00 p.m. on FSO PRE: 3 3 7.3 3.3 2.3 .33 24.4 10/23 @ ORL 7:00 p.m. on FSO 10/26 vs. IND 8:00 p.m. on FSO 10/28 @ MIL 8:00 p.m. on FSO F 22 LARRY NANCE 6-7 245 18-19: 67 30 9.4 8.2 3.2 .520 26.8 10/30 vs. CHI 7:00 p.m. on FSO PRE: 3 1 10.0 6.7 1.3 .478 24.1 11/1 @ IND 7:00 p.m. on FSO 11/3 vs. DAL 7:30 p.m. on FSO C 24 JARELL MARTIN 6-10 239 18-19: 42 1 2.7 1.7 0.4 .413 7.8 11/5 vs. BOS 7:00 p.m. on FSO PRE: 3 1 5.0 5.3 0.7 .667 16.4 11/8 @ WAS 7:00 p.m. on FSO/ESPN 11/10 @ NYK 7:30 p.m.
    [Show full text]