Satire, Identity and State-Of-The-Nation Novels in Jonathan Coe’S Fiction

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Satire, Identity and State-Of-The-Nation Novels in Jonathan Coe’S Fiction UNIVERSITATEA DIN CRAIOVA FACULTATEA DE LITERE ȘCOALA DOCTORALĂ „ALEXANDRU PIRU” SATIRE, IDENTITY AND STATE-OF-THE-NATION NOVELS IN JONATHAN COE’S FICTION SUMMARY Îndrumător științific: Prof. Univ. Dr. OLARU Victor Doctorand, ȚACU Andreea Daniela CRAIOVA 2020 SATIRE, IDENTITY AND STATE-OF-THE-NATION NOVELS IN JONATHAN COE’S FICTION SUMMARY In his essay, The Paradox of Satire, Jonathan Coe argued that “if you could not cleanse the world of its deformities, you could at least laugh at them” (Coe 2013: 3435). Coe’s novels are often regarded as satirical accounts of contemporary Britain, wrapped in what foreign audiences identify as the English sense of humour. Over the last five decades, Britain has experienced radical political, social and economic changes, from the election of Margaret Thatcher in 1979 to the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union in 2017. This period of tension and concern permeated literature and was translated into a series of political novels regarded by the critics as contemporary state-of-the-nation fiction. Jonathan Coe is considered one of the harshest critics of British recent history and his poetic perspective on life is remarkably tied to the historical circumstances of Great Britain during the last decades. The combination of literariness with humour and wry observations about politics and society is probably what helped him achieve great critical recognition as well as commercial success. However, we find it quite surprising that Coe’s fiction has prompted rather little serious academic discussions, beyond some assertions related to his technical artistry or to the political aspect of his novels. There is no doubt that the satirical discourse is the main ingredient in almost all of Jonathan Coe’s novels. From the first satirical works of fiction, the writers have written not only to reveal a personal indignation regarding a certain aspect of their contemporary societies, but mostly with a clear sense of ethical concern for the public interest, aiming to dissolve the inequities and abuses, to expose the faults of the society that needed to be corrected. If satire has historically been used as a means of disproving those in authority, this artistic expression evolved over time, reflecting the mentality of the context in which the satiric work was written. A very wide concept, which made it a real challenge for the literary critics to clearly define, satire encapsulates several characteristics. The two most important components of satire, humour and ethics, persisted over the years, from Aristophanes to contemporary writers. Comedy became an essential ingredient in the process of creating efficient satires, and in Jonathan Coe’s fiction comedy is translated in the form of dark 2 humour, irony, sarcasm, cynicism, leading to a different kind of laughter, bleaker and wrapped in nostalgia and melancholy. Postmodern satirical novels envision the protagonists as allegorical representations of the vices in the contemporary society and they have the tendency to depict a rather dystopic panorama of the world. Although satire is the core of most of Jonathan Coe’s novels, what immediately drew our attention was the fact that his fictional works are not restricted to mere political and social criticism, but they deeply reveal the complexity of the postmodern condition and expose the characters’ inabilities to react to the dilemmas posed by postmodern times. Moreover, we observed a very close relationship between satire and identity, translated in a mutual influence between satirical devices and identity construction, by means of opposition and otherness. Our research encompasses an interdisciplinary approach to literary criticism, aesthetics, literary stylistics, cultural studies, politics and studies of identity, and the analysis is theoretically inscribed in the framework of discourse analysis around postmodernity. Our interpretations rely heavily on the studies of Fredric Jameson, Linda Hutcheon, Brian McHale, Terry Eagleton, Jean-Francois Lyotard, Lance Olsen and Patricia Waugh. The theoretical discussions around the issues of identity and identity formation are based on the scientific works of Jacques Lacan and Sigmund Freud, as well as on the very recent study of Massih Zekavat Satire, Humour and the Construction of Identities. Since our research left behind the concept(s) of identity and/or otherness defined in relation to colonialism, the studies of Edward Said did not represent a priority and were not approached in the process of analysis. As the title of the thesis suggests, this study is devoted to analysing the literary works of Jonathan Coe, a contemporary novelist whose satirical socio-political fiction encapsulates some particular features of postmodernism and illustrates a sort of shift in today’s satirical fiction, marked by a proclivity to highlight human vulnerabilities in order to expose broader social and political vices. The subject of our investigation is an in-depth analysis of six selected works by Jonathan Coe, What a Carve Up! (1994), The House of Sleep (1997), The Rotters’ Club (2001), The Closed Circle (2004), Number 11 ─ Or Tales that Witness Madness (2015), and Middle England (2018), in the context of contemporary British satire, pointing out the current functions of satirical devices within a postmodern text, the relationship between satire and 3 identity and between satire and state-of-the-nation novels, in order to illustrate both the evolution of satire as a stylistic device and Coe’s contribution towards redefining the contemporary English novel or, as Mellet argued, his contribution to giving a new impulse to the metafictional and postmodern writings (2015: 16). The objective of this research involves the analysis of satire within the postmodern context, in order to determine the efficiency of such stylistic device (or even literary genre) in relation to the current realities generated by postmodernism. Although Coe is also regarded as a realist novelist by some literary critics, his novels are deeply anchored in the logic of chaos specific to postmodern fiction, due to the intentional fragmentation of his writings, the multiple genres mixed together in complex plots which feature intertextuality, narrative loops, multiple perspectives and constant shifts in time and space. Throughout the thesis, we adopt various research methods. However, a combination of non-structured qualitative analysis and structured quantitative analysis governs most of our research. Generally, the methodologies applied in our study derive from textual criticism, mostly inscribed in contemporary and postmodern literary theories. Starting from a more general framework, marked by our intention to (re)define the concept of satire and to trace back Jonathan Coe’s literary influence, and closely moving on towards more specific issues, embodied by the use of satire as a means of approaching socio- political problems and by the relationship between satire and identity, our main research questions run as follows: 1. How did the poetics of satire change from Jonathan Coe’s first political novel to his later satirical works? 2. What is the effect of satire and comic forms in depicting contemporary Britain? 3. Is it of any help to write a novel about the political difficulties in an already unstable society? Can satire actually lead to a positive change or it just makes things worse? If comic forms usually distract from the potential sadness of the situation, does it mean that satire distances the readers from the brutality of real life, dissolving anger and preventing them from taking action? 4. Is there any close relationship between satire and identity within a postmodern literary work, given the fact that both concepts are present in almost all walks of contemporary life? 4 5. Can the mechanisms of satire contribute to the formation of social and individual identities? 6. What is the role of satire in writing state-of-the-nation novels? The critical reception of Jonathan Coe’s novels is also an important focal point in the research process, predominantly throughout the first part of the thesis. We analyse, compare and contrast critical reviews from different social and cultural backgrounds, focusing especially on British, Spanish and Romanian criticism. As we have already mentioned, what surprised us from the beginning was that Jonathan Coe’s fiction has attracted quite little academic research, although the writer received a lot of public attention after the publication of What a Carve Up! (1994). It even seems that his novels were better received by the common readers in continental Europe than in the United Kingdom. Consequently, the number of critical materials was very scarce, consisting of only three books dedicated exclusively to the analysis of Coe’s novels, two of which are designed as introductory guides to his novels; two PhD dissertations and one collection of critical essays. Therefore, in supporting and proving our hypothesis, we approach a corpus-based analysis and we also rely on a great number of interviews with the author, to supplement the lack of critical material. Accordingly, the research methods consist of interpreting and comparing primary sources. Biographical and historical materials are also used in order to establish the social and political climate in which Jonathan Coe wrote. The results are supported with a number of critical essays on the author and with several periodicals which deal specifically with the subject of politics in the United Kingdom. The
Recommended publications
  • Brexit-Tales from a Divided Country: Fragmented Nationalism in Anthony Cartwright’S the Cut, Amanda Craig’S the Lie of the Land, and Jonathan Coe’S Middle England
    Brexit-Tales from a Divided Country: Fragmented Nationalism in Anthony Cartwright’s The Cut, Amanda Craig’s The Lie of the Land, and Jonathan Coe’s Middle England Emma Linders, S2097052 Master thesis: Literary Studies, Literature in Society: Europe and Beyond University of Leiden Supervisor: Prof. Dr. P.T.M.G. Liebregts Second reader: Dr. M.S. Newton Date: 01-02-2020 (Zaichenko) Emma Linders 2 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 3 CHAPTER 1 – Strangers in a Familiar Land: National divisions in Anthony Cartwright’s The Cut ......... 10 Outsider Perspective ......................................................................................................................... 10 Personification .................................................................................................................................. 11 Demographic Divides ........................................................................................................................ 11 Foreign Home Nation ........................................................................................................................ 13 Class Society ...................................................................................................................................... 14 Geography ......................................................................................................................................... 16 Language
    [Show full text]
  • Political Fiction Or Fiction About Politics. How to Operationalize a Fluid Genre in the Interwar Romanian Literature
    ȘTEFAN FIRICĂ POLITICAL FICTION OR FICTION ABOUT POLITICS. HOW TO OPERATIONALIZE A FLUID GENRE IN THE INTERWAR ROMANIAN LITERATURE What’s in a Genre? A reader of contemporary genre theories is compelled to conclude that, one way or another, the idea of literary class has managed a narrow escape from obsolescence. Conceptual maximalism fell behind the pragmatic call to respond to a global cultural environment for which the task of grouping, structuring, organizing, labelling remains vital for a long list of reasons, of which marketing policies are not to be forgotten. The modern story of the field has seen many twists and turns. After some theories of genre evolutionism – derived more or less from Darwinism – consumed their heyday in the 1890s–1920s1, Bakhtin (1937) took a decisive step toward a “historical poetics”, before Wellek, Warren (1948), Northrop Frye (1957), and Käte Hamburger (1957), and, later on, Gérard Genette (1979), Alastair Fowler (1982), or Jean-Marie Schaeffer (1989) returned to self- styled mixtures of formalism and historicism2. The study which pushed forward the scholarship in the field was, surprisingly or not, a fierce deconstruction of the “madness of the genre”, perceived as a self- defeating theory and practice of classification, highly necessary and utterly impossible at the same time. In his usual paradoxical manner, Derrida (1980) construes the relationship between the individual work and its set as one of 1 See, for instance: Ferdinand Brunetière, L’évolution des genres dans l’histoire de la littérature, Paris, Hachette, 1890–1892; Albert Thibaudet, Le liseur de romans, Paris, G. Crès et Cie, 1925; Viktor Shklovsky, O теории прозы [On the Theory of Prose], Москва, Издательств o “Федерация”, 1925.
    [Show full text]
  • Utopia, Myth, and Narrative
    Utopia, Myth, and Narrative Christopher YORKE (University of Glasgow) I: Introduction [I]n the 1920s and 1930s…Fascist theorists…adapting the language of Georges Sorel, grandiloquently proclaimed the superiority of their own creative myths as ‘dynamic realities,’ spontaneous utterances of authentic desires, over the utopias, which they dismissed as hollow rationalist constructs.1 - Frank and Fritzie Manuel We have created a myth, this myth is a belief, a noble enthusiasm; it does not need to be reality, it is a striving and a hope, belief and courage. Our myth is the nation, the great nation which we want to make into a concrete reality for ourselves.2 - Benito Mussolini, October 1922; from speech given before the ‘March on Rome’ One of the most historically recent and damaging blows to the reputation of utopianism came from its association with the totalitarian regimes of Hitler’s Third Reich and Mussolini’s Fascist party in World War II and the prewar era. Being an apologist for utopianism, it seemed to some, was tantamount to being an apologist for Nazism and all of its concomitant horrors. The fantasy principle of utopia was viewed as irretrievably bound up with the irrationalism of modern dictatorship. While these conclusions are somewhat understandable given the broad strokes that definitions of utopia are typically painted with, I will show in this paper that the link between the mythos of fascism and the constructs of utopianism results from an unfortunate conflation at the theoretical level. The irrationalism of any mass ethos and the rationalism of the thoughtful utopian planner are, indeed, completely at odds with each other.
    [Show full text]
  • 226 Jacques Ranciére the Politics of Literature. Cambridge
    Philosophy in Review XXXIII (2013), no. 3 Jacques Ranciére The Politics of Literature. Cambridge: Polity Press 2011. 224 pages $69.95 (cloth ISBN 978–0–7456–4530–8); $24.95 (paper ISBN 978–0– 7456–4531–5) The Brothers Karamazov is not only a superb novel but contains theological and philosophical material which arouses (holy) envy even in the most charitable theologian and philosopher. As a title, Jacques Ranciére’s The Politics of Literature can espouse a similar type of envy. While one should not judge a book by its cover (or title), it was those four words that drew me to the work and the opportunity to review it. Unlike the Jewish people who were said to accept the Torah before God even articulated its parameters (“we will do and we will obey”), I should have inquired and investigated more first before doing anything. Ranciére’s work is a collection of ten nebulously linked, previously published essays translated from the French by Julie Rose (the French collection was published in 2006). The title of the book is also the title of its first chapter. The essay (and book) opens: “The politics of literature is not the same thing as the politics of writers. It does not concern the personal engagements of writers in the social or political struggles of their times. Neither does it concern the way writers represent social structures, political movements or various identities in their books” (3). Sadly, it was precisely in hope of further examining those elements that attracted me to the work. As I am a theologian espousing postcolonial, liberation, and feminist approaches to texts, drawing upon my literary background and developing work in ethics and politics, I can only be candid in acknowledging that it was a rocky beginning for this reviewer, to say the least.
    [Show full text]
  • Politics in Fictional Entertainment: an Empirical Classification of Movies and TV Series
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by OPUS Augsburg International Journal of Communication 9(2015), 1563–1587 1932–8036/20150005 Politics in Fictional Entertainment: An Empirical Classification of Movies and TV Series CHRISTIANE EILDERS CORDULA NITSCH University of Duesseldorf, Germany This article presents conceptual considerations on the classification of TV series and movies according to their political references and introduces an empirical approach for measuring the constituent features. We argue that political representations in fiction vary along two dimensions: political intensity and degree of realism. These dimensions encompass four indicators relating to characters, places, themes, and time. The indicators were coded for a sample of 98 TV series and 114 movies. Cluster analyses showed four clusters of TV series and six clusters of movies. Nonpolitical fiction, thrillers, and fantasy were central types in both TV series and movies. Movies, however, stand out through a greater diversity and a focus on the past that is reflected in three additional types. Based on the identification of different types of movies and TV series, three directions for theory building are suggested. Keywords: fictional entertainment, TV series, movies, classification, political intensity, degree of realism As the lines between information and entertainment become increasingly blurred, scholarly attention is not only directed to entertainment features in information programs but extends to information in entertainment programs. The latter especially regards the pictures of reality that are constructed in the respective programs. Attention is directed to both the identification of such pictures and the assessment of their possible effects.
    [Show full text]
  • Dystopian Novels: a Warning Or an Instruction Manual
    Dystopian novels: A warning or an instruction manual Kordić, Ivan Master's thesis / Diplomski rad 2012 Degree Grantor / Ustanova koja je dodijelila akademski / stručni stupanj: Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences / Sveučilište Josipa Jurja Strossmayera u Osijeku, Filozofski fakultet Permanent link / Trajna poveznica: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:142:538084 Rights / Prava: In copyright Download date / Datum preuzimanja: 2021-09-30 Repository / Repozitorij: FFOS-repository - Repository of the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Osijek SVEUČILIŠTE JOSIPA JURJA STROSSMAYERA U OSIJEKU FILOZOFSKI FAKULTET Ivan Kordić DYSTOPIAN NOVELS – A WARNING OR AN INSTRUCTION MANUAL Diplomski rad Mentor: doc.dr.sc. Sanja Runtić Osijek, 2012. ABSTRACT Although the dystopian idea has been present in literature for over two thousand years, not until the second half of the nineteenth century did the dystopian literature become appreciated as an important cultural force. Dystopia found its roots in science fiction, but it has also blossomed in political fiction, and became a separate literary genre, following the developments of the first half of the twentieth century. The dystopian authors became social critics who examine the political practice of the world society. Two of the most important representatives of twentieth-century dystopian fiction -- George Orwell and Aldous Huxley -- both explored future states of their societies. In Nineteen Eighty-Four (1949) George Orwell wanted to inform English society about the emerging political systems such as Bolsheviks or the Nazis. Orwell´s aim was to satirize the emerging vanity and popularity of governments. Huxley´s Brave New World (1931) portrayed a world where human beings were produced like clones and conditioned with artificial happiness through a never-ending variety of pleasures and seductions.
    [Show full text]
  • Surveillance Society in Dystopian Novels and Contemporary Society
    The Representation of Surveillance Society in Dystopian Novels and Contemporary Society Emilie Kaleta Ida Johanne Skall Sørensen AALBORG UNIVERSITET Abstract This thesis examines the representation of surveillance and totalitarian societies in the dystopian novels 1984 (1949), A Scanner Darkly (1977), and The Circle (2013), from three different decades throughout history. This representation will be investigated through the Power/Knowledge scheme as presented by Michel Foucault as well as Fredric Jameson’s theory of The Political Unconscious. This thesis analyses the hegemonic ideologies imposed by totalitarian regimes as an attempt to create docile, conformed bodies that further allows the regime to sustain and maintain its power over society. Furthermore, the thesis analyses the correlation between the political and historical circumstances that not only played a prominent role at the time of the novels’ publication, but also in contemporary society, which enters into the notion that dystopian novels often function as cautionary warnings. The findings of the analyses are thought-provoking when considering the parallels that exist in relation to contemporary surveillance societies and their application of technological devices through which the government interferes and limits the private life of its citizens. This is especially applicable to the global pandemic of COVID-19, where the notion of surveillance and its usability is greatly discussed. The conclusion to be drawn is that surveillance societies and totalitarian systems are utilised
    [Show full text]
  • INTRODUCTION MARTIN GRIFFIN and CHRISTOPHER HEBERT
    INTRODUCTION MARTIN GRIFFIN and CHRISTOPHER HEBERT tories of Nation: Fictions, Politics, and the American Experience aims at re- Spairing the lines of communication between, on the one hand, the critical approach in literary and cultural studies that sees all fction as political in the sense of embodying a set of covert ideological assumptions; and, on the other hand, the perspective that regards political fction, poetry, and drama as a valid and often popular subgenre of literature that needs some examination, espe- cially in the context of a highly polarized society such as the United States in the early twenty-frst century. A prose narrative or poem or flm about politics is one type of exercise in the dimensions of meaning that the imagination can give to political experiences. But a political fction can also be a story about how applied political rhetoric is itself built around structured narratives and images. For instance, in the special edition of American Literary History dedi- cated to “Writing the Presidency,” John Michael examines John F. Kennedy’s timely “political self-invention,” through his Pulitzer Prize-winning book Profles in Courage, as an “embodiment of manly vigor and heroic courage” (424, 430). Kennedy’s clever gambit, recovering past senatorial biographies in order to burnish his own by association, ultimately helped the young poli- tician inspire supporters and win election. More recently we witnessed the “swift-boating” of 2004 Democratic presidential nominee John Kerry, which turned the narrative of his service with the US Navy in the Vietnam War into something problematic, even damaging, contributing to his defeat.
    [Show full text]
  • We Love Big Brother: an Analysis of the Relationship Between Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four and Modern Politics in the United S
    University of Connecticut OpenCommons@UConn Honors Scholar Theses Honors Scholar Program Spring 5-4-2018 We Love Big Brother: An Analysis of the Relationship between Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty- Four And Modern Politics in the United States and Europe Edward Pankowski [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://opencommons.uconn.edu/srhonors_theses Part of the Literature in English, North America Commons, and the Political Theory Commons Recommended Citation Pankowski, Edward, "We Love Big Brother: An Analysis of the Relationship between Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four And Modern Politics in the United States and Europe" (2018). Honors Scholar Theses. 559. https://opencommons.uconn.edu/srhonors_theses/559 We Love Big Brother: An Analysis of the Relationship between Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four And Modern Politics in the United States and Europe By Edward Pankowski Professor Jennifer Sterling-Folker Thesis Adviser: Professor Sarah Winter 5/4/2018 POLS 4497W Abstract: In recent months since the election of Donald Trump to the Presidency of the United States in November 2016, George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four has seen a resurgence in sales, and terms invented by Orwell or brought about by his work, such as “Orwellian,” have re- entered the popular discourse. This is not a new phenomenon, however, as Nineteen Eighty-Four has had a unique impact on each of the generations that have read it, and the impact has stretched across racial, ethnic, political, and gender lines. This thesis project will examine the critical, popular, and scholarly reception of Nineteen Eighty-Four since its publication 1949. Reviewers’ and commentators’ references common ideas, themes, and settings from the novel will be tracked using narrative theory concepts in order to map out an understanding of how the interpretations of the novel changed over time relative to major events in both American and Pankowski 1 world history.
    [Show full text]
  • Elliptic Feminism and Nationalism in Nayantara Sahgal's Rich Like Us Harveen Sachdeva Mann, Loyola University, Chicago
    Elliptic Feminism and Nationalism in Nayantara Sahgal's Rich Like Us Harveen Sachdeva Mann, Loyola University, Chicago Since its publication in 1985, Nayantara Sahgal's novel Rich Like Us has been overwhelmingly praised by critics as an insightful political fiction, winning for the author the coveted Sahitya Akademy Award (India) and the Sinclair Prize (Britain). Because the chief temporal setting of the text—from 1932 to 1975—en­ compasses both the Indian independence movement and its aftermath, leading up to and including the infamous political Emergency declared by Indira Gandhi, and because it overtly treats questions of governmental policy, the majority of scholars have focused almost exclusively upon the novel's engagement with national poli­ tics, disregarding the implications of such a macro-narrative for the micro-narra­ tive of gender. O.P. Mathur, for example, commends Rich Like Us solely as an ex­ posé of the "objectives and functioning of the Emergency" and the "nexus linking politics, business, and crime."1 More telling is Ramesh Chadha's emphasis upon the mutual exclusivity of Sahgal's national and gender politics as she asserts that "along with the political themes, [Sahgal] also portrays the modern Indian wom­ an's search for individual freedom and self-realization."2 Thus failing to analyze the negative relational links between the discourses of nation and woman, Chadha unproblematically describes Rich Like Us as a "feminist" text.3 Further, no critic has investigated the fissures that mark Sahgal's (ostensible) nationalist sympathies in the novel. On the contrary, Jasbir Jain praises it as a discerning "po­ litical biography," "the story of a country ..
    [Show full text]
  • Political Fiction and Allegory in the EFL Classroom What’S the Use?
    Political Fiction and Allegory in the EFL Classroom What’s the Use? Author: Shaun W. Christiani Supervisor: Dr. Claes Lindskog Term: Fall 2018 Course: ÄEND04 English IV Individual Research Project (15 hp) English Teacher Education POLITICAL FICTION AND ALLEGORY IN THE EFL CLASSROOM Abstract What is the use of political fiction and its allegory in a language education context? The aim of this paper is to analyze the relevance of this literary genre to curricula, English language learning, and EFL classrooms. The specifically political content of this genre, its allusion to real-world happenings, and the linguistic aspects of the texts may be pedagogically instrumentalized and host a potential that English teachers can engage to innovate their teaching. By laying forth that a fundamental aim of most curricula is students’ acquisition of democratic values and then analyzing the theories behind language affordances and allegory, this paper may act as a theoretical framework for planning a unit with a political fiction text involved. This paper finds that politically allegorical texts provide a context for students to inquire into the worth of democratic values and their successful communication in the vehicular language about their arguments and interpretations is made possible by language affordances drawn from the text’s content. Associating fictitious political, ideological, or cultural content of texts with one’s own personal experiences is a capability of all students of English. This sort of association encourages and supports critical thinking, a trait of lifelong learning competence. English language teachers may innovate their teaching and engage student’s cognitive flexibility capabilities, associating politics and language learning by using political fiction and allegory.
    [Show full text]
  • SUPPORTING Gibb St, Birmingham B9 4AA
    Calendar January - April 2015 JANUARY Saturday 10 Young Writers’ Foundation Group £80/£65 for the year Thursday 15 Short and Sweet: Short Fiction Salon Free Saturday 24 Writer Networking Morning: Stafford Free Tuesday 27 Short Course: Towards a Poetry Collection £110 for six sessions FEBRUARY Thursday 5 Poetry by Heart - Birmingham & West Midlands Final Free Tuesday 10 David Lodge: / Quite a Good Time to be Born, A Memoir £4 Thursday 12 Short and Sweet: Short Fiction Salon Free Monday 16 - Friday 20 Page Talk Young Writers’ Week £5 per day | £25 for the week Saturday 21 Page Talk Young Writers’ Festival Free Saturday 28 The Student Writers’ Toolkit £12 MARCH Thursday 12 Short and Sweet: Short Fiction Salon Free Saturday 14 Writer Networking Morning: Dudley Free APRIL Thursday 2 Jonathan Coe - Short Stories and Live Music £10 / £8 Thursday 9 Short and Sweet: Short Fiction Salon Free Thanks to all Friends, Supporters & Benefactors of Writing West Midlands. Programme of Activities If you would like more information about our Friends scheme, please visit the January - April 2015 Support Us page on either of our websites. www.writingwestmidlands.org / www.birminghamliteraturefestival.org Writing West Midlands, Unit 204, The Custard Factory, SUPPORTING Gibb St, Birmingham B9 4AA. Tel: 0121 246 2770 CREATIVE WRITERS AND CREATIVE WRITING www.writingwestmidlands.org IN THE WEST MIDLANDS. Company Registration Number: 6264124. Registered Charity Number: 1147710. WWW.WRITINGWESTMIDLANDS.ORG The advertised programme is subject to change without notice where unavoidable. WHO WE ARE & WHAT WE DO WELCOME We are the region’s literature development Happy New Year and welcome to Writing West agency.
    [Show full text]