DOCSLIB.ORG

This Thesis Has Been Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for a Postgraduate Degree (E.G

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
This Thesis Has Been Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for a Postgraduate Degree (E.G This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: • This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. • A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. • This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. • The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. • When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. The Political Union Debate in Canada’s Maritime Provinces, 1960-1980: Why did a Union Not Happen? Luke Flanagan PhD University of Edinburgh 2012 I declare that this thesis is my own work and effort. Where other sources have been used, they are acknowledged. Luke Flanagan PhD Candidate November 2012 Abstract Utilising a historical perspective and drawing upon path dependence theory, the thesis focuses on the question of a political union of Canada’s three Maritime provinces - Nova Scotia, New Brunswick and Prince Edward Island - between 1960 and 1980. Drawing on archival sources and interviews the thesis examines the factors which increased the potential for a union and resulted in a political union not occurring in this period. The thesis reveals how the intensification of Quebec separatism throughout the 1960s and 1970s threatened to separate the region geographically from the rest of the country. It also shows that the regional expansionist agenda of the federal government undermined provincial jurisdiction as it sought to eliminate economic underdevelopment in the Maritime region. These factors coupled with the dynamics of province-building and the political ambition of key political leaders in the Maritimes created the impetus for a political union in the 1960s. The thesis pays particular attention to the Maritime Union Study (MUS), established in 1968 by the Maritime premiers to investigate the union question. The thesis argues that the MUS was a critical juncture because it presented the premiers with a number of alternative choices for political change, including its main recommendation: the establishment of a political union. However, the thesis reveals that upon the publication of the final report of the MUS in November 1970, the ramifications of the 1970 October Crisis in Quebec and the recent election of new premiers in Nova Scotia and New Brunswick reconfigured the national and regional contexts in which a political union was considered. This reconfiguration led to a new form of institutionalised intergovernmental relations called the Council of Maritime Premiers (CMP). The CMP was a confederal structure which respected the provincially-focused decision-making capacity of the Maritime premiers. The key conclusion of the thesis is that engagement with the question of a political union reflected a balance between political environment and political agency. The national political environment encouraged the consideration of a political union because it revealed a vulnerability to external occurrences which were beyond the control of the three provinces and connected with an internal logic for change. A political union was seen as a way for the region to develop the capacity to become economically self-sufficient and in turn neutralise the implications of unexpected externalities. However, alternative opportunities for political action were pursued when the national political environment became reconfigured and new political leaders were elected. This dynamic explains why, despite a critical juncture, a union did not happen. As such, the thesis shows that the current understanding of change to path dependent i settings is confirmed. Established trajectories will be more inclined towards persistence than change. The key contribution of the thesis to path dependence theory is that change is not the default outcome of a critical juncture. If change is viable, considered but not ultimately selected it is no less a critical juncture than those which produce enduring change. On a broader level, the thesis gives an indication as to the difficulty of political amalgamations between constitutionally protected entities within established federal states. ii Contents Chapter Page List of Figures and Tables v List of Abbreviations vi Key Events Timeline viii Key Political Leaders and Actors xii 1. Sub-National Political Union in a Federal State 1 2. Conceptualising Sub-National Political Union 14 3. Researching Sub-National Political Union 38 4. The Maritime Provinces: The Origins of Distinct Territorial Governance 70 5. The Swinging of a Pendulum: Canadian Federalism to the 1950s 100 6. The 1960s: The Emergence of the Political Union Concept 132 7. Towards a Critical Juncture: The Establishment of the Maritime Union Study 160 8. The 1970s: Political Union vs. Intergovernmental Cooperation 194 9. Conclusion: Why did a Political Union Not Happen? 230 Appendices 1. Louis Robichaud’s Speech to the Charlottetown Centennial Conference 243 2. Louis Robichaud’s Document to the Atlantic Premiers Conference 246 iii 3. Legislative Resolutions Committing to Establish a Political Union Study 248 4. Legislative Statement Made by Each Maritime Premier Announcing the Establishment of the Maritime Union Study 249 5. Special Studies of the Maritime Union Study 250 Bibliography 252 iv List of Figures and Tables Figure Title Page No. 2.1 The Process of Structural Change 30 2.2 Bolleyer’s indicators for the degrees of institutionalization of IGR 34 3.1 Hypothesised Process of Change within Path Dependent Settings 41 4.1 Map of the Maritime Region as a Single Territorial Entity – 1783 72 4.2 The Four Maritime Colonies (and Newfoundland) 1807 76 4.3 The Meaning of Responsible Government 80 8.1 Editorial Cartoon by Bob Chambers - 28 April 1970 198 Table Title Page No. 3.1 Relative Attractiveness of Canada and the Provinces by Province (1974) 47 3.2 Approval Rating for Provincial Premiers, February 2010 55 Imports and Exports to the United States, 1853-1866, as a percentage of those 4.1 85 of 1853 (Maritime Colonies. Total Relief and Other Public Welfare Expenditures (Millions of Canadian 5.1 104 Dollars) 5.2 Federal Subventions and Grants-in -Aid to the Provinces, 1913-1937 113 Transfer Payments from Federal to Provincial Government as a Share of 6.1 150 Provincial Government Revenues, 1961-1980 (Percentage of Total Revenue) Equalization Entitlements by Province, 1960-1980 (By province, millions of 6.2 152 Canadian dollars) Application of Bolleyer institutionalisation model to the Council of Maritime 8.1 209 Premiers v List of Abbreviations ACW – American Civil War APC - Atlantic Premiers Conference APEC - Atlantic Provinces Economic Council AnPC - Annual Premiers Conference B&B - Bilingualism and Biculturalism BC - British Columbia BNA – British North America BNA Act – British North America Act CBC - Canadian Broadcasting Corporation CMP - Council of Maritime Premiers CPOs - Causal Process Observations DR – Durham Report DREE - Department of Regional Economic Expansion EOP - Equal Opportunity Programme FLQ - Front de Libération du Québec HI – Historical Institutionalism ICR – Inter-Colonial Railway IGAs – Intergovernmental Arrangements IGR - Intergovernmental Relations INUS – A neither sufficient nor necessary factor that is part of an overall combination that is sufficient for the outcome JLA - Joint Legislative Assembly JLC - Joint Legislative Committee MP – Member of Parliament MPC - Maritime Provinces Commission MRM - Maritime Rights Movement MUS - Maritime Union Study NDP – New Democratic Party NI - New Institutionalism PEI - Prince Edward Island PQ - Parti Québécois SUIN - a sufficient but unnecessary part of a factor that is insufficient but necessary for an outcome vi UK – United Kingdom UN - Union Nationale US - United States VEP - Voluntary Economic Planning vii Key Events Timeline 1758-1956 1758 Establishment of Representative Government in Nova Scotia. 1769 Colonisation of Ile Saint-Jean (PEI). 1784 Colonisation of New Brunswick and Cape Breton. 1820 Re-annexation of Cape Breton to Nova Scotia. 1848 Establishment of Responsible Government in Nova Scotia and New Brunswick. 1851 Establishment of Responsible Government in PEI. 1864 Charlottetown Conference – discussion of a political union of the three Maritime colonies. 1867 Canadian Confederation. 1867 Entry of Nova Scotia and New Brunswick into Confederation. 1873 Entry of PEI into Confederation. 1929-1939 The Great Depression. 1939-1945 The Second World War. 1940 Publication of the Rowell-Sirois Commission. 1956 (July) Establishment of the Atlantic Premiers Conference. viii 1956 (October) Election of the Progressive Conservative Party of Nova Scotia under Robert Stanfield. 1960-1980 1960 (22 June) Election of the Liberal Party of Quebec under Jean Lesage. 1960 (27 June) Election of the Liberal Party of New Brunswick under Louis Robichaud. 1963 (April) Wilfred O'Neill, a night watchman at the Canadian Army Recruitment Centre in Montreal is killed in an explosion at the Centre. The Front de Libération du Québec (FLQ) claim responsibility. 1963 (October) Louis Robichaud’s speech to the Empire Club of Canada. Highlights extreme separatism
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Press Release Darrell Dexter Named Honorary Fellow at Maceachen
    Press Release Darrell Dexter Named Honorary Fellow at MacEachen Institute HALIFAX, Aug. 14, 2017 – The Honourable Darrell Dexter, Former Premier of Nova Scotia, has been appointed an Honorary Distinguished Fellow at the MacEachen Institute for Public Policy and Governance. Based at the Institute, he will teach students as an adjunct professor in a public policy research course at Dalhousie University starting this September. The course will offer graduate students an opportunity to engage in thoughtful discussion, debate key public policy challenges and work on current, real-world policy problems. “The MacEachen Institute is delighted to name Darrell Dexter as an Honorary Distinguished Fellow. His career demonstrates his passion and commitment for improving Nova Scotia through public service," said Kevin Quigley, Professor, and Scholarly Director of the Institute. “He also has a vast breadth of knowledge and experience in the world of public policy. Our students will benefit immensely from his unique experiences." The course will convene as a round table each week and feature a variety of guests including thought leaders, academics, politicians and representatives from non-governmental organizations. Mr. Dexter will chair the round tables. “I’m honoured to be recognized in this way. I’m also looking forward to teaching the next generation of policy leaders at Dalhousie," said Dexter. “In the class, we’ll be exploring important topics like healthcare, Atlantic growth and civic engagement.” Born in Halifax, Darrell Dexter holds degrees from Dalhousie University and the University of King’s College. He was the leader of the Nova Scotia NDP from 2001 to 2013, and served as the province’s Premier from 2009 to 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • This Week in New Brunswick History
    This Week in New Brunswick History In Fredericton, Lieutenant-Governor Sir Howard Douglas officially opens Kings January 1, 1829 College (University of New Brunswick), and the Old Arts building (Sir Howard Douglas Hall) – Canada’s oldest university building. The first Baptist seminary in New Brunswick is opened on York Street in January 1, 1836 Fredericton, with the Rev. Frederick W. Miles appointed Principal. Canadian Pacific Railway (CPR) becomes responsible for all lines formerly January 1, 1912 operated by the Dominion Atlantic Railway (DAR) - according to a 999 year lease arrangement. January 1, 1952 The town of Dieppe is incorporated. January 1, 1958 The city of Campbellton and town of Shippagan become incorporated January 1, 1966 The city of Bathurst and town of Tracadie become incorporated. Louis B. Mayer, one of the founders of MGM Studios (Hollywood, California), January 2, 1904 leaves his family home in Saint John, destined for Boston (Massachusetts). New Brunswick is officially divided into eight counties of Saint John, Westmorland, Charlotte, Northumberland, King’s, Queen’s, York and Sunbury. January 3, 1786 Within each county a Shire Town is designated, and civil parishes are also established. The first meeting of the New Brunswick Legislature is held at the Mallard House January 3, 1786 on King Street in Saint John. The historic opening marks the official business of developing the new province of New Brunswick. Lévite Thériault is elected to the House of Assembly representing Victoria January 3, 1868 County. In 1871 he is appointed a Minister without Portfolio in the administration of the Honourable George L. Hatheway.
    [Show full text]
  • Message from Premier Darrell Dexter
    Highlights of the coming year include: Highlights of the coming year include: • expanding SchoolsPlus into more regions • merging administrative services of district • tripling the number of students who can health authorities and the IWK, with participate in online virtual classrooms anticipated savings of $7.6 million this year growing to $41.5 million • increasing funding per student to $10,457, the highest it has ever been • continuing to evaluate departmental programs and services for effectiveness • ensuring that class sizes remain at current and affordability 20-year low Government Business Plan • saving more money through strategic for the fiscal year 2012–2013 • doubling the number of schools offering purchasing skilled trades, and helping students prepare for upcoming shipbuilding opportunities • continuing restraint on out-of-province travel and the purchase and use of cell phones, • establishing skilled trades centres in other Message from Premier Darrell Dexter Blackberries, and office space parts of the province Nova Scotia is on the verge of some of the largest economic projects in the province’s • expanding Succeeding in Reading into Grade 2 history. Opportunities like the shipbuilding contract, the Lower Churchill hydroelectric • launching a social marketing campaign Conclusion project, and Shell Oil’s commitment to invest hundreds of millions of dollars in on cyberbullying and reviewing all exploration off our coast are going to significantly boost our economy. Much careful Nova Scotia is moving forward with a plan. recommendations in the recent report work and planning went into securing these projects, and much work lies ahead. This plan will ensure that the government aligns its resources to support what matters In the coming year, the province will work hard to build upon this momentum, to Nova Scotians: better health care, creating capitalize on these opportunities, and aggressively seek others.
    [Show full text]
  • Joseph Howe and the Reformers Won a Majority in the 1847 Election
    Narrator: And he did win! Joseph Howe and the Reformers won a majority in the 1847 election. The very next year, Nova Scotia became the first colony in British North America to achieve responsible government. Then, from August 3, 1860 to June 5th, 1863, Joseph Howe served as Premier of Nova Scotia. When he did not get re-elected in 1863, he was appointed by Britain as the Imperial Fisheries Commissioner. However, things were changing in British North America. Led by Howe’s political opponent and the new premier of Nova Scotia, Charles Tupper, political leaders from Nova Scotia started discussions with leaders from New Brunswick, Prince Edward Island, Newfoundland and Canada (Canada East and West). Their goal was to form a united (or confederated) country. Tupper invited Howe to be one of the delegates to the Charlottetown Conference in 1864, but Howe turned him down. However, by 1866 Howe was a vocal opponent of Confederation. His anti-Confederation views clashed with the views of Charles Tupper during the election campaign in August1867. Tupper: Well Joe, you simply can’t win can you? Howe: Just wait and see. Tupper (amused): You cannot be serious about continuing your opposition to Confederation. Howe (determined): Of course, I recognize that Confederation has been achieved. The British North America Act was passed last month by the British Parliament. But— 10 Tupper (enthusiastic): On July 1st, 1867, Canada became a country! This was a victory for all Canadians! Howe: But not for Nova Scotians! Tupper: Nova Scotia’s Parliament voted for Confederation. Howe: The vote was a scandal which never should have happened! You should have put the proposed union to a vote by the people of Nova Scotia and not just by the government leaders.
    [Show full text]
  • Strengthening New Brunswick's Democracy
    Strengthening New Brunswick’s Democracy Select Committee Discussion Paper on Electoral Reform July 2016 Strengthening New Brunswick’s Democracy Discussion Paper July 2016 Published by: Government of New Brunswick PO Box 6000 Fredericton, New Brunswick E3B 5H1 Canada Printed in New Brunswick ISBN 978-1- 4605-1033-9 (Print Bilingual) ISBN 978-1- 4605-1034-6 (PDF English) ISBN 978-1- 4605-1035-3 (PDF French) 10744 Table of Contents Select Committee on Electoral Reform 1 Message from the Government House Leader 2 How to use this discussion paper 3 Part 1: Introduction 4 Part 2: Making a more effective Legislature 8 Chapter 1: Eliminating barriers to entering politics for underrepresented groups 8 Chapter 2: Investigating means to improve participation in democracy 12 Internet voting 18 Part 3: Other electoral reform matters 20 Chapter 1: Election dates 20 Chapter 2: Election financing 21 Part 4: Conclusion 24 Part 5 : Appendices 25 Appendix A - Families of electoral systems 25 Appendix B - Voting systems 26 Appendix C - First-Past-the-Post 31 Appendix D - Preferential ballot voting: How does it work? 32 Appendix E- Election dates in New Brunswick 34 Appendix F - Fixed election dates: jurisdictional scan 36 Appendix G- Limits and expenses: Adjustments for inflation 37 Appendix H - Contributions: Limits and allowable sources jurisdictional scan 38 Appendix I - Mandate of the Parliamentary Special Committee on Electoral Reform 41 Appendix J - Glossary 42 Appendix K - Additional reading 45 Select Committee on Electoral Reform The Legislature’s Select Committee on Electoral Reform The committee is to table its final report at the Legislative is being established to examine democratic reform in the Assembly in January 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • W. S. Fielding and the Liberal Party in Nova Scotia, 1891 - 1896
    K. M. McLaughlin W. S. Fielding and the Liberal Party in Nova Scotia, 1891 - 1896 Sir Richard Cartwright, Knight Commander of the Order of St. Michael and St. George, inveterate politician, ardent proponent of the policy of Unrestricted Reciprocity with the United States, was utterly despondent on learning the results of the election of 1891. Macdonald and the Conservatives remained on the benches of the Government side of the House. The National Policy so despised by Cartwright was still the law of the land. Victory had eluded the Liberals again. What so infuriated Cartwright was that Macdonald and the Conservatives had won their greatest support where Cartwright thought they ought to have been weakest — in the Maritime provinces. "The shreds and patches" of the nation, he fumed, had kept Sir John in power.1 Since Confederation Nova Scotians had been a puzzling enigma to the leaders of the Liberal party. Their special pleading in 1876 had moved Sir Richard Cartwright not to grant a significant increase in the tariff.2 Yet Nova Scotians voted overwhelmingly against the Liberal party in the elections of 1878, 1882 and 1887.3 Before the election in 1891, Nova Scotian Liberals assured their colleagues that the party would do well. Nova Scotia's Attorney- General, J. W. Longley, was quite confident of success. He believed that popular opinion supported the party's tariff policy and he had obtained money from the United States to finance the campaign, while the Conserv­ atives had less money than in previous elections. Even Sir Charles Tupper's return to Nova Scotia at the special behest of Sir John A.
    [Show full text]
  • Sir Charles Tupper Canada’S Sixth Prime Minister
    1 Sir Charles Tupper Canada’s sixth prime minister Quick Facts Term(s) of Office: May 1, 1896–July 8, 1896 Born July 2, 1821, Amherst, Nova Scotia Died October 30, 1915, Bexley Heath, England Grave site: St. John's Cemetery, Halifax, Nova Scotia Education University of Edinburgh, Scotland, M.D. 1843 Personal Life Married 1846, Frances Morse (1826–1912) Three sons, three daughters Occupations Physician 1867–1870 President, Canadian Medical Association Author Political Party Conservative 1896–1901 Party Leader Constituencies 1867–1884, 1887–1888 Cumberland, Nova Scotia 1896–1900 Cape Breton, Nova Scotia Other Ministries 1857–1860, 1863–1867 Provincial Secretary (Province of Nova Scotia) 1870–1872 President of the Privy Council 1872–1873 Inland Revenue 1873 Customs 1878–1879 Public Works 1879–1884 Railways and Canals 1887–1888 Finance 1896 Secretary of State of Canada 2 Political Record Premier of Nova Scotia 1864–1867 Participant in the Confederation Conferences of Charlottetown 1864, Quebec 1864, and London 1866 Father of Confederation 1867 Construction of the Canadian Pacific Railway 1879–1884 High Commissioner to the United Kingdom 1884–1887, 1888–1896 Leader of the Opposition 1896–1901 Biography The human mind naturally adapts itself to the position it occupies. The most gigantic intellect may be dwarfed by being cabin'd, cribbed and confined. It requires a great country and great circumstances to develop great men.—Charles Tupper, 1865 By reason of his personal skills and experience, no one had greater qualification to be prime minister than Charles Tupper. It is one of the strange quirks of fate and Canadian history that he served the shortest term of office of any prime minister.
    [Show full text]
  • July 29, 2020 the Honourable Stephen Mcneil, MLA Premier of Nova Scotia Halifax, NS
    July 29, 2020 The Honourable Stephen McNeil, MLA Premier of Nova Scotia Halifax, NS Dear Premier McNeil, As you know, the COVID-19 pandemic presents particular risks for nurses and other health workers. The World Health Organization has stated that health workers are at increased risk of COVID-19 infection, and data from the US and UK suggests frontline workers are infected at 12 times the rate of the general population. In Canada, recent data suggests that over one in five (21.52%) cases is a health care worker. On March 11th of this year, the day the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a global pandemic, the Nurses’ Union, along with the NSGEU, Unifor and CUPE, called upon your government to ensure that health workers dealing with confirmed or potential patients with COVID-19 exercise airborne precautions, which means they should be provided with N95 respirators, in addition to gowns, gloves and faceshields or goggles. This is in contrast to contact and droplet precautions, where a surgical mask is used instead of a respirator. On March 12th, in a meeting with the Chief Medical Officer and leading infectious disease specialists in the province, we reiterated this request, emphasizing the importance of the precautionary principle. At the time, we were told that respirator masks should be conserved solely for aerosol generating medical procedures, and that SARS-COV-2 was spread via contact and expelled droplets, rather than via particles aerosolized during breathing, coughing and sneezing. Further, it was suggested that our request, if realized, would recklessly deplete the stock of respirators.
    [Show full text]
  • A Historical and Legal Study of Sovereignty in the Canadian North : Terrestrial Sovereignty, 1870–1939
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository University of Calgary Press University of Calgary Press Open Access Books 2014 A historical and legal study of sovereignty in the Canadian north : terrestrial sovereignty, 1870–1939 Smith, Gordon W. University of Calgary Press "A historical and legal study of sovereignty in the Canadian north : terrestrial sovereignty, 1870–1939", Gordon W. Smith; edited by P. Whitney Lackenbauer. University of Calgary Press, Calgary, Alberta, 2014 http://hdl.handle.net/1880/50251 book http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 International Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca A HISTORICAL AND LEGAL STUDY OF SOVEREIGNTY IN THE CANADIAN NORTH: TERRESTRIAL SOVEREIGNTY, 1870–1939 By Gordon W. Smith, Edited by P. Whitney Lackenbauer ISBN 978-1-55238-774-0 THIS BOOK IS AN OPEN ACCESS E-BOOK. It is an electronic version of a book that can be purchased in physical form through any bookseller or on-line retailer, or from our distributors. Please support this open access publication by requesting that your university purchase a print copy of this book, or by purchasing a copy yourself. If you have any questions, please contact us at ucpress@ ucalgary.ca Cover Art: The artwork on the cover of this book is not open access and falls under traditional copyright provisions; it cannot be reproduced in any way without written permission of the artists and their agents. The cover can be displayed as a complete cover image for the purposes of publicizing this work, but the artwork cannot be extracted from the context of the cover of this specificwork without breaching the artist’s copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring the Fiscal Performance of Canada's Premiers
    Studies in Budget & Tax Policy October 2010 Measuring the Fiscal Performance of Canada’s Premiers by Charles Lammam, Milagros Palacios, Amela Karabegović, and Niels Veldhuis Studies in Budget and Tax Policy October 2010 Measuring the Fiscal Performance of Canada’s Premiers by Charles Lammam, Milagros Palacios, Amela Karabegović, and Niels Veldhuis www.fraserinstitute.org / Fraser Institute Fraser Institute / www.fraserinstitute.org Contents Executive summary / 1 Introduction / 7 Why fiscal performance matters / 8 How performance is measured / 15 Fiscal performance of Canada’s premiers / 21 Conclusion / 32 Province-by-province analysis / 33 Appendix 1 Methodology / 48 Appendix 2 Corporate Capital Tax / 53 References / 54 About the authors / 65 Acknowledgments / 67 Publishing information / 68 Supporting the Fraser Institute / 69 About the Fraser Institute / 70 Editorial Advisory Board / 71 www.fraserinstitute.org / Fraser Institute Fraser Institute / www.fraserinstitute.org Measuring the Fiscal Performance of Canada’s Premiers / 1 Executive summary In a world of increasing competitiveness, sound fiscal policy is a critical determinant of long-term economic success. Sound fiscal policy requires that governments balance their financial affairs and avoid imposing a tax burden so heavy that it becomes a disincentive for people to work hard, save, invest, and be entrepreneurial, while still ensuring adequate and efficient public services. So, our political leaders should prioritize, rather than sim- ply increase, government resources; ensure balanced budgets; and focus on improving incentives for individuals and businesses to engage in productive economic activity. Since there is currently no objective measure of how provincial pre- miers are performing in the area of fiscal policy, it is difficult for Canadians to hold the premiers accountable for the relative performance of their fiscal policies.
    [Show full text]
  • Mabel Penery French MABEL PENERY FRENCH (1881-1955): a LIFE RE-CREATED Lois K
    Mabel Penery French MABEL PENERY FRENCH (1881-1955): A LIFE RE-CREATED Lois K. Yorke* I think all lawyers must agree, On keeping our profession free, From females whose admission would Result in any thing but good. Because it yet has to be shown, That men are fit to hold their own. In such a contest, I’ve no doubt, We’d some of us be crowded out. In other spheres of business life Much discontent among men is rife, For women quick, alert and deft Supplant their rivals right and left .... Praise to the benchers who have stood Against the innovating flood, To save us and our ample fees From tribulations such as these.1 On the evening of 17 January 1955, Mary Louise Lynch, Registrar of the University of New Brunswick Law School at Saint John, addressed the regular monthly meeting of the local Lions Club. Lynch, a 1933 graduate of the Law School, chose as her topic “Women in the Law,” focusing particularly on those New Brunswick women who had established themselves in the profession. Noting that women lawyers in general had “a very exacting role and must have great interest in their work if they are to succeed,” Lynch identified Miss Mabel P. French as the first woman admitted to the provincial bar in 1907. Lynch, who was a recognized authority on the activities of New Brunswick lawyers, past and present, could recount of French only that she “later moved to western Canada Head, Manuscripts Division, Public Archives of Nova Scotia, and Literary Editor of the Nova Scotia Historical Review.
    [Show full text]
  • Prince Edward Island Met in Charlottetown, Ostensibly for the Pur- Pose of Discussing a Proposal for Maritime Union
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository University of Calgary Press University of Calgary Press Open Access Books 2018-10 Reconsidering Confederation: Canada's Founding Debates, 1864-1999 University of Calgary Press Heidt, D. (Ed.). (2018). "Reconsidering Confederation: Canada's Founding Debates, 1864-1999". Calgary, AB: University of Calgary Press. http://hdl.handle.net/1880/108896 book https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 International Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca RECONSIDERING CONFEDERATION: Canada’s Founding Debates, 1864–1999 Edited by Daniel Heidt ISBN 978-1-77385-016-0 THIS BOOK IS AN OPEN ACCESS E-BOOK. It is an electronic version of a book that can be purchased in physical form through any bookseller or on-line retailer, or from our distributors. Please support this open access publication by requesting that your university purchase a print copy of this book, or by purchasing a copy yourself. If you have any questions, please contact us at [email protected] Cover Art: The artwork on the cover of this book is not open access and falls under traditional copyright provisions; it cannot be reproduced in any way without written permission of the artists and their agents. The cover can be displayed as a complete cover image for the purposes of publicizing this work, but the artwork cannot be extracted from the context of the cover of this specific work without breaching the artist’s copyright. COPYRIGHT NOTICE: This open-access work is published under a Creative Commons licence.
    [Show full text]