2019.12.23.887182V1.Full.Pdf
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2019.12.23.887182; this version posted December 23, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Two distinct bacterial biofilm components trigger 2 metamorphosis in the colonial hydrozoan Hydractinia echinata 3 4 Huijuan Guo,1# Maja Rischer,1# Martin Westermann,2 Christine Beemelmanns1,* 5 1 Leibniz Institute for Natural Product Research and Infection Biology – Hans Knöll Institute, 6 Beutenbergstraße 11a, D-07745 Jena, Germany 7 2 Electron Microscopy Centre, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Ziegelmühlenweg 1, D-07743 8 Jena, Germany 9 # contributed equally 10 * Email: [email protected] (ORCID 0000-0002-9747-3423) 11 12 Classification 13 Major: Chemical Sciences 14 Minor: Ecology 15 Keywords 16 Hydractinia, Pseudoalteromonas, metamorphosis, phospholipids, polysaccharides 17 Author Contributions 18 Conceptualization: M.R, H.G, M.W., C.B.; Methodology: M.R, H.G, M.W., C.B.; Investigations: 19 M.R, H.G, M.W., C.B.; Resources: M.W., C.B.; Writing – Original Draft: M.R, H.G, C.B. 20 Supervision and Funding Acquisition: M.W., C.B. 21 This PDF file includes: 22 Main Text 23 Figures 1 to 6 24 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2019.12.23.887182; this version posted December 23, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Abstract 2 Bacterial-induced metamorphosis of larvae is a widespread cross-kingdom communication 3 phenomenon within the marine environment and critical for the persistence of many invertebrate 4 populations. However, the chemical structures of the majority of inducing bacterial signals and the 5 underlying cellular mechanisms remain enigmatic. Hydractinia echinata larvae transform upon 6 detection of bacterial biofilm components into the colonial adult stage. Despite serving as cell 7 biological model system for decades, the inducing bacterial signals remained undiscovered. 8 Using a chemical-ecology driven analysis, we herein identified that specific bacterial 9 (lyso)phospholipids and polysaccharides, naturally present in bacterial biofilms, elicit 10 metamorphosis in Hydractinia larvae. While (lyso)phospholipids (e.g. 16:0LPG/18:1LPE, 16:0 11 LPA/18:1LPE) as single compounds or in combinations induced up to 50% of all larvae to 12 transform within 48 h, two structurally distinct polysaccharides, the newly identified Rha-Man 13 polysaccharide from Pseudoalteromonas sp. P1-9 and curdlan from Alcaligenes faecalis caused 14 up to 75% of all larvae to transform within 24 h. We also found combinations of 15 (lyso)phospholipids and curdlan induced the transformation in almost all larvae within 24 h, 16 thereby exceeding the morphogenic activity observed for single compounds and axenic bacterial 17 biofilms. By using fluorescence-labeled bacterial phospholipids, we demonstrated their 18 incorporation into the larval membranes, where interactions with internal signaling cascades 19 could occur. Our results demonstrate that multiple and structurally distinct bacterial-derived 20 metabolites converge to induce high transformation rates of Hydractinia larvae, which might 21 ensure optimal habitat selection despite the general widespread occurrence of both compound 22 classes. 23 24 Significance Statement 25 Bacterial biofilms profoundly influence the recruitment and settlement of marine invertebrates, 26 critical steps for diverse marine processes such as coral reef formation, marine fisheries and the 27 fouling of submerged surfaces. Yet, the complex composition of biofilms often makes it 28 challenging to characterize the individual signals and regulatory mechanisms. Developing 29 tractable model systems to characterize these ancient co-evolved interactions is the key to 30 understand fundamental processes in evolutionary biology. Here, we characterized for the first 31 time two types of bacterial signaling molecules that induce the morphogenic transition and 32 analyzed their abundance and combinatorial activity. This study highlights the crucial role of the 33 converging activity of multiple bacterial signals in development-related cross-kingdom signaling. 34 35 36 2 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2019.12.23.887182; this version posted December 23, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Main Text 2 3 Introduction 4 The radical transformation (metamorphosis) of planula larvae into the adult stage is a critical step 5 in the life cycle of many marine species as it confers the propagation and persistence of the 6 population in the marine ecosystem.1 For more than 80 years it has been recognized that 7 chemical signals present within marine bacterial biofilms induce or even prevent settlement and 8 metamorphosis in benthic marine larvae,2-4 but their identification remains still a challenging task 9 due to low production levels and unestablished model systems. Hence, until today only very few 10 key bacterial signals have been structurally characterized.5-7 A prime example represents the 11 bacterial product thallusin isolated from Zobellia uliginosa, which induces metamorphosis in the 12 alga Monostroma oxyspermum.8 Several members of the Polychaeta class and Cnidaria phylum 13 have also served as model systems for bacterial-induced metamorphosis over decades.9,10 In 14 several studies, it was found that bromopyrroles produced by Pseudoalteromonas induce larvae 15 of several coral species to undergo metamorphosis; however induced larvae failed to attach to 16 surfaces when stimulated by bromopyrroles alone indicating that other, yet unidentified, chemical 17 cues might be important for the morphogenic process.11,12 Recent biochemical investigations of 18 the bacteria-induced metamorphosis of the marine polychaete Hydroides elegans resulted in the 19 identification of a phage tail-like contractile injection systems (tailocins) in Pseudoalteromonas 20 species that induce settlement and metamorphosis by releasing an effector protein Mif1, which 21 stimulates the P38 and MAPK signaling pathways.13-15 However, bacteria not capable of 22 producing theses proteinaceous injection systems were also found to induce the transformation 23 releasing additional, yet structurally not defined morphogens.16,17 In the 1970s, Leitz and Wagner 24 reported that a lipid-like molecule of Pseudoalteromonas espejiana (original name: Alteromonas 25 espejiana) induces larvae transformation in Hydractinia echinata, an early branching metazoan 26 lineage dating back more than 500 million years.18,19 But despite intensive studies, the bacterial 27 signals causing Hydractinia larvae to metamorphose have remained elusive. Instead, 28 metamorphosis of Hydractinia was artificially induced using high salt concentrations (CsCl) 29 allowing seminal studies on migratory stem cells, allorecognition (self-recognition), the canonical 30 Wnt-signalling system, and the development of muscles and nervous systems.20,21 However, it 31 was noted from early on that artificial induction caused phenotypical and developmental 32 differences in Hydractinia development compared to bacterial induction.22 33 34 The long-standing unsolved question about the structures of bacterial signals and the apparent 35 morphological differences in larvae development between artificial and natural induction attracted 36 our interest. Thus, we set out to solve the structures of the bacterial signals that induce 37 metamorphosis in Hydractinia, which would allow us to shed light on the biochemistry underlying 38 this ancient prokaryote-eukaryote signaling mechanisms.23 39 3 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2019.12.23.887182; this version posted December 23, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Results 2 Bioassay-guided identification of bacterial signals 3 To investigate which co-occurring bacteria induce metamorphosis in H. echinata (hereafter 4 Hydractinia) we isolated morphological distinct co-occurring bacterial species from the surface of 5 a healthy and freshly collected Hydractinia colony.24 For a mono-species biofilm-based 6 metamorphosis assay, we selected 29 representative bacterial isolates, including seven genome- 7 sequenced Hydractinia-associated strains, one coral associated strain Pseudoalteromonas sp. 8 PS5,11,12 and eight bacterial type strains obtained from culture collections. Similar to previous 9 observations, we observed the inconsistent timing of metamorphosis using biofilms compared to 10 the artificial control (> 6 mM CsCl final concentration), presumably due the inhomogeneous 11 nature of biofilms and spatial concentrations differences of the yet unidentified inducing signals in 12 bacterial biofilms. To enable a comparative analysis of the inducing activity, we adopted the 13 established stage-chart of morphological appearances by Leitz