Henry Caselli Richards, Foundation Professor of Geology, University of Queensland by Dr

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Henry Caselli Richards, Foundation Professor of Geology, University of Queensland by Dr Henry Caselli Richards, Foundation Professor of Geology, University of Queensland by Dr. Bruce Martin. https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:732831 Presentation at the Queensland History Group talk, 9 November 2010. Introduction It is with much pleasure and pride that I deliver this short talk which is to inform you of certain facts and insights into the life of Henry Caselli Richards, a man who was a great Queenslander and who was my grandfather. Those people, who were acquainted with HCR’s professional career and activities, would often say, “gee he did a lot of things”. So when I researched his life for the purpose of this presentation I found that he did indeed “do a lot of things”. Therefore, I am going to tell you something of his life in the limited time available. I can assure you that the preparation has been a rewarding and humbling experience, and I am grateful to Owen for extending this invitation to speak. I would also like to express gratitude to Jack Woods who is here to-night and who was a student of Henry Caselli Richards when he did a full course in geology, and who told me of his reputation and abilities and other matters about the man. Professor John Jell, who unfortunately is unable to be here as he is on Heron Island poor fellow, has been extremely helpful in providing information, particularly with respect to the early days of reef research. John has taken on the mantle of chief reef researcher after Dorothy Hill who in turn took over from HCR. He was firstly a practical geologist He was an academic and a scientist and an inspiring teacher and leader, particularly within the University of Queensland He was also a forceful and resolute committee man, advising the University, Governments, Scientific bodies and Art galleries. He was a loving and considerate family man and a real gentleman. It is a great shame that he died in 1947 at the age of 63 when he still had so much more to offer the community and his family. Henry Caselli Richards was born in Melton Victoria on 16 December 1884. His father, Benjamin who was head of the local primary school was married to Jane Sargent. There were five boys and HCR was the second born. He was always “Harry” to his family and close friends. His grandfather, another Benjamin, was a pioneer in the dairying industry in the South Gippsland region of Victoria. After attending his father’s school, HCR went to the Box Hill Grammar School where he excelled in sport and academically, and so was made school captain. In 1904, HCR enrolled as a student at the University of Melbourne studying geology and chemistry. Here he came under the influence of Ernest Willington Skeats from Southampton who had just been appointed to head the new department of geology. His association with Skeats for whom he 1 always retained a great admiration and high regard was to prove a very important influence throughout his life and was reflected in his methods of teaching, and in his essentially practical outlook on all things geological. HCR, an exceptional student, graduated BSc in 1906. He remained at the University taking the Dixon Final Honours Scholarship in 1907, obtaining his Masters. After university, he spent a year in Broken Hill working with the Bavay Zinc Treatment Company, and was therefore introduced to the novel process of treating ores by the flotation process. Upon his return to Melbourne, he took up the Caroline Kay Research Scholarship, and so spent two years investigating the building stones of Victoria, writing a paper on the topic. Ultimately, he became the acknowledged Australian authority on building stones. In 1910, HCR came to Brisbane to take up an appointment as lecturer at The Central Technical College. He had hardly settled into that position when he transferred to the newly established University of Queensland as lecturer in charge of the Department of Geology. Incidentally, when in Broken Hill, HCR befriended one Arthur Christian, a mining engineer. Arthur was injured in a mining accident, so was in hospital, to be visited there by his mother Violet Christian and Arthur’s sister Grace, from Melbourne. So Harry met Grace and they were married in St. Georges Anglican Church Malvern early in 1911. 2 Henry Caselli Richards and the University of Queensland There was a move in the colony of Queensland to form a university. The discussions on this matter went on for thirty or forty years as there was considerable resistance from a number of quarters both within and outside government, on various pretexts. Finally, the University Act was given Royal Assent, and Government House was requisitioned for use as the University building. Even though Sir William MacGregor lost his home, he accepted the post of Chancellor. He was given another home. A Senate appointed by Order in Council on 14 April 1910 of twenty members, sat for the first time on 22 April 1910 and set about appointing the first professors. These appointments were made later in 1910, and they commenced to equip and staff their respective departments. Lecturers were then appointed, including HCR in geology and mineralogy taking up his appointment on 21 March 1911. So this is how the University was at that time. The University took students in 1911 and there were about eighty, including part time and external. There was a great celebration called the Inaugural Ceremony on Thursday 1st June 1911 at the Exhibition Hall in Gregory Terrace. Richards was one of those early appointees to the University of Queensland who continued to have an enduring interest in its welfare and development, so ensuring a foundation for the thriving world-class educational institution, which now, as Queenslanders, gives us much pride. HCR was elevated to Professor in 1919 together with Parnell, Mayo and Harvey Johnstone, retaining his position as head of the department, until his death. The staff in 1922. He was highly regarded as a teacher and researcher, was very much at home on excursions with his students, and he enthusiastically participated in social and sporting activities. HCR appeared very young, so much so that on one of the excursions to a quarry, the quarry master asked him when his father was to arrive. He therefore took to wearing a large pith helmet on excursions so that this became his badge of office. He was generally known as “the Prof.” Grace would accompany the group on camps as “chaperone.” indicate Grace Soon after commencing at the University, he embarked upon the large task of charting the volcanic rocks of South East Queensland. The resulting paper was presented to the Royal Society of Queensland, and earned him his Doctorate of Science from the University of Melbourne. He built the Department of Geology until it was numerically the largest geology department in Australia He was respected by his students as a lucid lecturer and teacher. Several of his students returned to the department after completing study at Cambridge as the holders of prestigious scholarships. These included Walter Bryan, Freddie Whitehouse and Research 3 Professor Dorothy Hill. Walter Brian remained with HCR in the Department, and upon his death succeeded him as Professor, and head of the Department. He was a clear thinking committee person so held numerous positions in the University, including Dean of the Science faculty, Chairman of the Academic Board, was on the Senate, and was the appointed as the first Deputy Chancellor. He was prominent in the “site debate” always being a keen proponent of the St Lucia option as opposed to the Victoria Park alternative. At the landmark meeting of the Senate on 10 December 1926 he seconded the narrowly successful motion that the University should move to the St Lucia site in preference to Victoria Park, even though it had land there. The Building and Grounds Sub- Committee of which HCR was Chairman was given the task of planning the St Lucia campus. However, nothing happened until the State Government made funds available under the Premiership of Forgan Smith. Sydney Architects Hennessy and Hennessy were appointed to draw up a plan, which is the basis of what we have to-day the principal feature being the Great Court with the separate buildings linked with the colonnade. The foundation stone was laid by Forgan Smith on 6 March 1937. It is known that HCR identified a geological fault through the site of the tower where the foundation stone was set. The foundations therefore had to be substantially reinforced so that the foundation stone found a new place, which is inside the main entrance foyer of the Forgan Smith building. 4 The University Buildings, St Lucia I am given to understand that the architects for the new university were keen on a stone from New South Wales as the firm Hennessy and Hennessy was a Sydney firm. There had always been reluctance by architects to utilise banded sandstone, as its appearance was considered to be not pleasing in comparison with the more uniform appearance that had been selected for public buildings up to that time. HCR could see no reason for rejecting the multi-coloured banded sandstone, as it was cheaper, having been discarded in the past, and on testing, it was equal to or surpassed the stone of more uniform colour with which it was compared. He wrote a report in relation to Queensland stones, which he held, would serve admirably in the construction. His opinions were accepted, so the multi-coloured iron banding appearance is what we enjoy to-day, sitting on the suggested granite for the base course.
Recommended publications
  • A History of Biogeographical Regionalisation in Australia
    Zootaxa 3392: 1–34 (2012) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2012 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) A history of biogeographical regionalisation in Australia MALTE C. EBACH School of Biological Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia and Department of Palaeontology, Australian Museum, 6 College Street Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The development of Australian biogeographical regionalisation since 1858 has been driven by colonial 19th-century exploration and by the late 20th-century biodiversity crisis. The intervening years reduced existing large scale regionalisation into smaller taxon specific areas of vegetation or endemism. However, large scale biotic biogeographical regionalisation was rediscovered during multi-disciplinary meetings and conferences, sparking short-term revivals which have ended in constant revisions at smaller and smaller taxonomic scales. In 1995 and 1998, the Interim Biogeographic Regionalisation for Australia and the Integrated Marine and Coastal Regionalisation of Australia, Australian Commonwealth funded initiatives in order to “identify appropriate regionalisations to assess and plan for the protection of biological diversity”, have respectively replaced 140 years of Australian biogeographical regionalisation schemes. This paper looks at the rise and slow demise of biogeographical regionalisation in Australia in light of a fractured taxonomic biogeographical community. Key words: biogeographical regionalisation, biogeography, classification, colonialism, systematics, taxonomy Introduction In Australasian lands so wide, By meadows green, and forests’ side, Strange and uncouth forms we see, Bounding over hill and lea. Kangaroos are gaily leaping, Wombats through their burrows creeping; And in deep streams, near sunny rocks, The duckbill - Nature’s paradox.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal & Proceedings of the Royal Society of New South Wales, Vol
    Journal and Proceedings of the Royal Society of New South Wales 2019 Volume 152 Part 1 Numbers 471 & 472 “... for the encouragement of studies and investigations in Science Art Literature and Philosophy ...” THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF NEW SOUTH WALES OFFICE BEARERS FOR 2019 Patron Her Excellency The Honourable Margaret Beazley AO QC Governor of New South Wales President Emeritus Professor Ian Sloan AO FRSN PhD (UCL) FAA Vice-Presidents Emeritus Professor D Brynn Hibbert AM FRSN PhD (Lond) CChem FRSC FRACI Mr John Hardie FRSN FHEA FGS MACE Ms Judith Wheeldon AM FRSN BS (Wis) MEd (Syd) FACE Hon. Secretary (Ed.) Emeritus Professor Robert Marks FRSN MEngSci ResCert PhD (Stan) Hon. Secretary (Gen.) Mr Bruce Ramage MRSN Hon. Treasurer Mr Richard Wilmott MRSN Hon. Librarian Dr Ragbir Bhathal FRSN PhD (UQ) FRAS FSAAS Hon. Webmaster Emeritus Professor Lindsay Botten FRSN PhD (Tas) Councillors Dr Mohammad Choucair FRSN PhD (UNSW) Emeritus Professor Robert Clancy AM FRSN PhD (Mon) FRACP FRCPSC Dr Laurel Dyson BSc(Hons) BA(Hons) PhD (Syd) MRSN Dr Donald Hector AM FRSN BE(Chem) PhD (Syd) FIChemE FIEAust FAICD Professor Nalini Joshi AO FRSN PhD (Prin) FAAS The Honorable Virginia Judge FRSN Mr Stuart Midgley MRSN Emeritus Professor Bruce Milthorpe FRSN BA PhD (ANU) Grad Dip Ed Dr Susan Pond AM FRSN DSc (UQ) FRACP FTSE FAHMS FAICD Honorary Professor Ian Wilkinson FRSN PhD (UNSW) Southern Highlands Ms Anne Wood FRSN Branch Representative Executive Office The Association Specialists EDITORIAL BOARD Em. Prof. Robert Marks FRSN MEngSci ResCert MS PhD (Stan) – Hon. Editor Prof. Richard Banati FRSN MD PhD Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesley Joyce Borowitzka B.Sc. (Hons), Ph.D., BA (Theol)
    Shattering the divine symbiosis: the impacts of science on clerics and church members in the Australian colonies, 1830- 1890 Lesley Joyce Borowitzka B.Sc. (Hons), Ph.D., B.A. (Theol), B.Theol. (Hons) This thesis is presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of Murdoch University in 2017. Declaration I declare that this thesis is my own account of my research and it contains as its main content work which has not been previously submitted for a degree at any tertiary institution. Lesley Joyce Borowitzka May 2017 i Shattering the divine symbiosis: the differing impacts of science on clerics and church members in the Australian colonies, 1830-1890 Abstract Between 1830 and 1890 developments in science challenged the interpretation of scripture and the theology of the Christian churches as never before. The new scientific theories of uniformitarianism, evolution and abiogenesis were rejected as atheistic by most clerics and church members, with the most conservative aspects of British theology and science expressed in the churches and the scientific establishment of the Australian colonies. Early in the century, natural theology, which encouraged the study of nature in order to learn more about its Creator, underpinned by literal interpretations of the creation accounts in scripture, was well established in Britain and among colonial clerics such as Charles Wilton and William Branwhite Clarke in Sydney and John Lillie in Hobart. They also promoted nature study for the improvement of the moral and intellectual life of colonists and to gain practical knowledge about the natural resources of the new land. From the 1830s however, natural theology and the creation accounts in Genesis were increasingly challenged by geological evidence.
    [Show full text]
  • Julian Tenison Woods: Natural Historian
    Julian Tenison Woods: Natural Historian Presidential Address delivered at the 141st Annual General Meeting of the Linnean Society of New South Wales, March 23rd 2016 by Emeritus Professor Robert J. King. Published on 12 July 2016 at http://escholarship.library.usyd.edu.au/journals/index.php/LIN King, R.J. (2016). Julian Tenison Woods: natural historian. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales. 138, 49-56. ‘The time has again come around when the duty and this included a brief period in France, where he devolves upon me to deliver the Annual Address to had hopes of improving his health. This concern for the members of the Society’. With these words the his health played a role in his decision to migrate to Rev. Julian Edmund Tenison Woods commenced his Australia. In 1854 he set out for Tasmania arriving 1880 Address at the conclusion of his second term early in 1855, but disappointed in what was offering as President of the Linnean Society of New South there he left to visit relatives in Melbourne, before Wales. moving to Adelaide towards the end of 1855. He was Tonight I wish to provide a brief introduction eventually ordained a priest in Adelaide in 1857, and to the scientifi c works of Father Tenison Woods a few months later began his work in the parish of and to highlight his contributions to the study of Penola, in southeast South Australia. In 1866 he and Australian natural history. Tenison Woods has in Mary MacKillop founded the Sisters of St Joseph, recent years come to public attention because of dedicated to the education of the Catholic poor and his close association with Saint Mary of the Cross, others with social needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Henry Huxley - Wikipedia
    3/4/2021 Thomas Henry Huxley - Wikipedia Thomas Henry Huxley Thomas Henry Huxley PC FRS HonFRSE FLS (4 May 1825 – 29 June 1895) was an English biologist and anthropologist specialising in comparative anatomy. He is known as "Darwin's Bulldog" for his The Right Honourable advocacy of Charles Darwin's theory of evolution.[2] Thomas Henry Huxley FRS FLS The stories regarding Huxley's famous debate in 1860 with Samuel Wilberforce were a key moment in the wider acceptance of evolution and in his own career, although historians think that the surviving story of the debate is a later fabrication.[3] Huxley had been planning to leave Oxford on the previous day, but, after an encounter with Robert Chambers, the author of Vestiges, he changed his mind and decided to join the debate. Wilberforce was coached by Richard Owen, against whom Huxley also debated about whether humans were closely related to apes. Huxley was slow to accept some of Darwin's ideas, such as gradualism, and was undecided about natural selection, but despite this he was wholehearted in his public support of Darwin. Instrumental in developing scientific education in Britain, he fought against the more extreme versions of religious tradition. Originally coining the term in 1869, Huxley elaborated on "agnosticism" in 1889 to frame the nature of claims in terms of what is knowable and what is not. Huxley states Agnosticism, in fact, is not a creed, but a method, the essence of which lies in the rigorous Woodburytype print of Huxley (1880 application of a single principle... the fundamental axiom of modern science..
    [Show full text]