TECHNICAL CHECKLIST
OF Basic Services to Urban Poor
MADURAI CORPORATION
1
1. Name of the State Tamil Nadu 2. Name of the City Maduri Corporation 3. i) Nodal agency Commissioner ii) Implementing agency Corporation of Madurai Madurai Corporation 4. Project Cost (Rs. in Lacs) 2685.94 Lakhs. 5. State Share (Rs. I lacs) i) Beneficary contribution 277.66 ii) Agency's own funds -- iii) Loan from HFI/Banks -- iv) Stat's Grant 1065.31 v) MP/MLALAD funds -- vi) Any other -- 6. Central share (Rs. in lacks) 1342.97 7. i) Project duration ii) date of commencement / completion 2 Years 8. Name of the bank/accident No. where sate share is -- deposited 9. Date & Amount of deposit (Rs. in lacs) -- 10. i) No. of DUs – New Upgradation 2515 ii) Floor area of a DU 250 S.q. feet iii) Whether there is provision kitchen in the DU? Yes iv) Whether there is provision of Toilet in the DU? Yes 11. i) Density (DU/hectare) -- ii) Whether proposed density adheres to the master Yes plan of the area? 12. i) The land use of the proposed site as per the master Residential plan ii) It not residential, then necessary approvals for -- change of land use have been taken. 13. Coverage area Percentage(%) Built-up area of housed 31.85% Roads / Pavement 23.0% Open Spaces 25.15% Community Facilities 5.0% Any other 15.0%
14 Wheather staturary approvals from various local bodies have been taken such as TCPO Not Applicable Corporation Yes Fire Depot Not Applicable Pollution board Not Applicable min of environment Not Applicable
15 Whether fire safty measures have been adopted Yes 16 Whether building plans master plans etc are enclosed Yes or not 17 Schedule of rate adopted (year) 2006-07 18 Provision of infrastructural facilities Yes
2 18 a Community Toilets i) expentiture involved 2 Nos – Rs.11.85 Lakhs ii) No of WC ? Baths Proposed yes 18 B Water Supply i) Expenditure involved 7 Nos – Rs. 10.50 Lakhs ii) Whether municipal water supply available in vivinity? if no, type of water Yes, Mini Power Pump supply system proposed? iii) Whether there is provision for rain water harvesting? 18.C Sewerage i) Expenditure involved -- ii) Whether municipal sewer line available in vicinity? if no, type of sewerage system -- proposed? 18.D Roads/pavements i) Expenditure involved 2.76 KM – Rs. 68.29 Lakhs ii) Whether connectivity with the main YES Peripheral road exists or not? if not is it proposed in the DPR. 18.E. Storm Water Drainage i) Expenditure involved 4.91 KM – Rs. 254.50 Lakhs ii) Whether connectivity with the primary / YES secondary drains exists or not? if not, is it proposed in the DPR. 18.F. Parks and open spaces -- 1) Expenditure involved 18.G. Electrification 1) Expenditure involved 259 Nos – Rs. 14.50 Lakhs 2) Whether street lighting of internal YES roads/pavements proposed? 18.H. Solid Waste Disposal i) Expenditure involved -- ii) Distance from landfill iii) Whether there is provision for waste recyling and segregation? 19. Other Services to be converged with other central/ -- state programme. 19.A. Health care facilities 1. Whether proposed within the site No 2. If not, does it exist in the Vicinity Yes 3. It not, is it proposed I the Vicinity No 4. If in the vivinity, distance from the site -- 5. Expenditure involved -- 6. Methodology adopted for convergence -- 19.B. Educational facilities 7. Whether proposed within the site -- 8. If not, does it exist in the vicinity -- 9. It not, is it proposed I the vicinity -- 10. If in the vicinity, distance form the site -- 11. Expenditure involved --
3 methodology adopted for convergence 19.C Social Security 1. Details of social security provision available -- like medical insurance, pension schemes etc., 2. Expenditure involved, item wise -- 3. Methodology adopted for convergence -- 19.D Provision of other civic amenities Provided 20. Provision of other civic amenities -- 21.A. Methodology adopted for maintenance of assets thus -- created. 21.B. Mechanism for sustainable management of services. -- 22.A Use of innovative & cost effective materials thereof. -- 22.B Use of earthquake resistant technology, details -- thereof 23. Project implementation Institutional frame work -- Institutional capacity -- PPP model, if any -- 24. List of documents Annexure Attached with DPR.
Signatures of the state level nodal officer
Name & designation:
SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER MADURAI CORPORATION
4 CHECK - LIST FOR PRERATION / APPRAISAL OF DPR IN INTEGRATED HOUSING & SLUM DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME (IHSDP)
1 Name of the State Tamil Nadu 2 Category of State whether special category or general (Special category General States are J&K, Uttaranchal, Himachal Pradesh & North Eastern States including Sikkim) 3 Name of the City Madurai Corporation Status Remarks (Yes/No) 4 a) Whether MOA for reforms has been signed with the Ministry of urban development? b) Whether a copy of the signed MOA has been received in the Ministry of Urban Employment & poverty Alleviation or not? c) Whether signed MOA mentions with asterish that two reforms, viz., i) Yes Repeal of Urban Land Ceiling and Regulation Act; and ii) Amendment of Rent Control Laws balancing the interest of landlords and tenants are optional with regard to schemes under IHSDP? 5 Whether the State level Nodal Agency has been designated? Yes
6 Whether the DPR has been forwarded by the designated Nodal Agency? Yes
7 Whether State level Co ordination Committee (SLCC) has been Yes constituted? 8 Whether DPR has been recommended by the SLCC? 9 Whether elected Local Body is in place? Yes 10 Total Urban population of the city (2001) 928,869 11 Total Slum population of the city 303,141 12 Is DPR an integrated housing & infrastructure project? ( If not, proper Yes justification) 13 Has the contribution from the beneficiaries been collected? Yes 14 Has the State share been deposited in a separate account Yes 15 Is the DPR for in situ development Yes 16 Is the DPR for relocation? No 17 In case of relocation, whether all basic amenities have been provided for No in the new site in the DPR? 18 Is the new site in proximity to the original site / work place? 19 In case of in site. Whether provision for basic services has been provided Yes for in the DPR? 20 Housing i) Whether density of population norms has been observed in the DPR Yes
5 with reference to city as per the bye laws? ii) Whether plotted area, setbacks and coverage of plot are as per Yes byelaws? iii) Whether maximum FAR Utilization has been considered in the DPR to Yes ensure efficient use of land? iv) Whether the dwelling unit cost is within the ceiling limit? Yes v) In case the cost is higher, whether the source of funds has been filed No up / indicated? vi) Whether security of tenure / patta has been provided to the Yes beneficiaries, as per guidelines, preferably women? vii) Whether the floor area of dwelling unit is equal or more than 25 sq Yes mtrs? viii) Whether each dwelling unit comprises two rooms, kitchen and a Yes toilet? 21 Infrastructure facilities Whether provisioning for the following has been made in DPR i) Water Supply Yes ii) Sewerage Yes iii) Solid waste disposal Yes iv) Development of roads/paths/footpaths/pavements Yes v) Storm water drains Yes vi) Street Lighting Yes 22 Whether environmental impact considerations have been taken into Yes account while preparing the DPR? 23 Community facilities Whether provisioning for the following has been made in DPR i) Community Centre Yes ii) Community Primary Health care centre iii) Primary Education Centre iv) Parks and open spaces 24 Whether there is provisioning for convergence of the Central and State Government schemes in the following sectors in the DPR i) Health ii) Education iii) Social security including accidental and medical insurance, old age pension , old age homes etc 25 Whether cost of land has been included in the project cost where private No land has been acquired? ( Applicable only to special category stages, viz., J&K Uttaranchal, Himachal Pradesh and north eastern states including Sikkim 26 Whether a separate provisioning for upkeep and maintenance of public Yes assets to be created through this project has been made by the state
6 Government / ULB / Parastatal? ( This provisioning will not be funded under the scheme) 27 Whether the area / beneficiaries covered under DPR had previously Yes NSDP benefited in any Central/ State Government Scheme? ( If so, details thereof ) 28 Whether DPR is a PPP Project? 29 Is the DPR in accordance with the IHSDP guidelines? If not, indicate Yes deviations and provide justifications 30 Any other information relevant to the DPR
SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER MADURAI CORPORATION
7
Basic Service to Urban Poor Programme (BSUP) – Phase I
PART - A Amount Sl. No. Details Km. Nos. (Rs. in Lakhs)
1. No. of Houses
New Construction -- 2515 2313.80
2. Water Supply -- 7 10.50
3. Road 2.76 -- 68.29
4. Community Hall -- 2 11.85
5. Street Light -- 259 14.50
6. Noon Meal Centre -- 2 1.50
7. UGSS / SWD 4.91 -- 254.50
8. Others -- 2 11.00
TOTAL 2685.94
8
PART - B (Rs. in Sl. No. Details Km. Nos. Lakhs)
1. State Share a) Beneficiary Contribution 277.66 b) Agency's Own Funds -- c) Loan from HF / Banks -- d) State's Government 1065.31 e) M.P. / M.L.A. LAD Funds -- f) Any other -- 2. Central Share 1342.97
Total Project Cost 2685.94
Superintending Engineer Madurai Corporation
9 Madurai Corporation
Abstract for 21 Slums
Noon Meal Community Housing Water supply Road SWD Community Hall Street Light W Center Toilet Sl. ar No Name of the Slum d Existing Existing Pro Existing Proposal Total . No Prop pos Amou Exist Prop Amou Exis Prop Amoun Exis Prop Amou Amou Exis Prop Amo Exis Prop Amou Amount . That Asbo osal al nt ing osal nt ting osal t ting osal nt nt ting osal unt ting osal nt RCC HSC PF SVL TL SVL TL ched tus PP 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 1 V.V GIRI SALAI 41 5 18 67 60 55.20 2 2 ------0.908.90 -- _ -- -- _ _ 56126 0.48 -- _ -- _ -- -- 64.58 POWER HOUSE 2 40 36 32 62 50 46.00 15 2 ------0.923.20 -- 0.8559.60 -- -- _ 5 6 1 53 0.60 ------129.40 ROAD 3 THIDEER NAGAR 31 346 116 303 272 250.24 68 10 ------1 6.25 7 2 1 1 1.40 ------257.89 4 HEERA NAGAR 31 39 8 186 10 9.20 45 7 ------0.74 99.00 ------16 9 5 1 0.76 ------108.96 5 FF ROAD 43 2 93 40 98 90.16 4 7 ------0.44.99 ------_ 5 6 1 1 0.48 ------95.63 6 INDIRA NAGAR 64 24 3 63 44 40.48 30 30 2 3.00 ------_ 1518 0.64 ------44.12 MEENAMBIGAI 7 64134 22 80 25 23.00 120 41 ------0.3 11.50 -- -- _ 13 82 5 -- 0.68 ------35.18 NAGAR SOLAI 8 60 79 223 145 227 208.84110 2 ------1.9 23.20 -- -- _ 5 6 1 1 0.48 ------232.52 ALAGUPURAM HANUMAR KOIL 9 35 38 121114172158.24 20 4 ------_ 6 9 3 2 0.44 -- 2 1.50 ------160.18 PADITHURAI 10 CHETTITHOPPU 35 30 32 100 162 149.04 20 ------0.5 24.30 -- -- 23.20 -- -- _ 6 9 8 10 0.84 ------197.38
11 MUTHUPATTI 65 138 177 401 293 269.56 15 6 ------0.5 17.00 -- -- _ 3 12 6 10 1.52 ------288.08 KOVALAN 12 64173 65 190 144 132.48 100 7 ------0.62 21.00 -- -- _ 8 34 28 11 4.36 ------157.84 NAGAR IRULAPPASAMY 13 59 63 104 110 146 134.32 5 9 ------0.1 6.90 ------_ -- 4 -- 9 0.06 ------141.28 KOIL STREET THOMATTI 14 RENGASAMY 50 20 30 130 150138.00 -- 20 ------_ 11 7 -- 10 0.06 ------1 1 5.50 143.56 STREET VILLAPURAM 15 5915 20 50 66 60.72 85 1 ------_ 12 3 -- 12 0.06 ------1 1 5.50 66.28 MAIN STREET EAST MADURAI 16 HARIJAN 55217 50 30 80 73.60 30 4 1 1.50 ------_ 5 15 -- 7 0.48 ------75.58 COLONY KAMARAJA 17 56822 128 125 253 232.76 20 110 1 1.50 ------_ 10 5 2 10 0.16 ------234.42 PURAM NAGUPILLAI 18 57215 50 24 74 68.08 50 8 1 1.50 ------_ 6 25 -- 5 0.06 ------69.64 THOPPU 19 INDIRA NAGAR 57 662 31 30 61 56.12 100 30 1 1.50 ------_ 8292 9 0.28 ------57.90
SHANTHI NAGAR AND 20 58 21 31 47 78 71.76 20 9 -- -- 0.25 -- -- 0.3 ------1 5.60 4 11 2 5 0.60 ------77.96 THAYUMANASA MY NAGAR HARIJAN 21 59 2 41 22 50 46.00 5 2 1 1.500.13 -- -- 0.1 ------_ -- 5 -- 1 0.06 ------47.56 COLONY 10 TOTAL -- 3081 1395 2319 2515 2313.80 864 311 7 10.50 0.38 2.76 68.29 0.38 4.91 254.50 -- 2 11.85 136 290 67 192 14.50 -- 2 1.50 2 2 11.00 2685.94 Madurai Corporation
Abstract for 21 Slums - Central, State & Beneficiary Contribution
New Construction Cost for Infrastructure Improvement Total
Sl. Ward Name of the Slum Total Cost Central State Govt. Beneficiary Central State Govt. Central State Govt. Beneficiar Total No. No. Total Govt. Share Share Share Govt. Share Share Govt. Share Share y Share Amount No Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount
1 2 345 20 1 V.V GIRI SALAI 41 60 55.20 27.60 20.98 6.62 9.38 4.69 4.69 32.29 25.67 6.62 64.58
2 POWER HOUSE ROAD 40 50 46.00 23.00 17.48 5.52 83.40 41.70 41.70 64.70 59.18 5.52 129.40
3 THIDEER NAGAR 31 272 250.24 125.12 95.09 30.03 7.65 3.825 3.825 128.95 98.92 30.03 257.89
4 HEERA NAGAR 31 10 9.20 4.60 3.50 1.10 99.76 49.88 49.88 54.48 53.38 1.10 108.96
5 FF ROAD 43 98 90.16 45.08 34.26 10.82 5.47 2.735 2.735 47.82 37.00 10.82 95.63
6 INDIRA NAGAR 64 44 40.48 20.24 15.38 4.86 3.64 1.82 1.82 22.06 17.20 4.86 44.12
7 MEENAMBIGAI NAGAR 64 25 23.00 11.50 8.74 2.76 12.18 6.09 6.09 17.59 14.83 2.76 35.18
8 SOLAI ALAGUPURAM 60 227 208.84 104.42 79.36 25.06 23.68 11.84 11.84 116.26 91.20 25.06 232.52 HANUMAR KOIL 9 35 172 158.24 79.12 60.13 18.99 1.94 0.97 0.97 80.09 61.10 18.99 160.18 PADITHURAI 10 CHETTITHOPPU 35 162 149.04 74.52 56.64 17.88 48.34 24.17 24.17 98.69 80.81 17.88 197.38
11 MUTHUPATTI 65 293 269.56 134.78 102.43 32.35 18.52 9.26 9.26 144.04 111.69 32.35 288.08
12 KOVALAN NAGAR 64 144 132.48 66.24 50.34 15.90 25.36 12.68 12.68 78.92 63.02 15.90 157.84 IRULAPPASAMY KOIL 13 59 146 134.32 67.16 51.04 16.12 6.96 3.48 3.48 70.64 54.52 16.12 141.28 STREET THOMATTI RENGASAMY 14 50 150 138.00 69.00 52.44 16.56 5.56 2.78 2.78 71.78 55.22 16.56 143.56 STREET VILLAPURAM MAIN 15 59 66 60.72 30.36 23.07 7.29 5.56 2.78 2.78 33.14 25.85 7.29 66.28 STREET EAST MADURAI HARIJAN 16 55 80 73.60 36.80 27.97 8.83 1.98 0.99 0.99 37.79 28.96 8.83 75.58 COLONY 17 KAMARAJA PURAM 56 253 232.76 116.38 88.45 27.93 1.66 0.83 0.83 117.21 89.28 27.93 234.42
18 NAGUPILLAI THOPPU 57 74 68.08 34.04 25.87 8.17 1.56 0.78 0.78 34.82 26.65 8.17 69.64
19 INDIRA NAGAR 57 61 56.12 28.06 21.33 6.73 1.78 0.89 0.89 28.95 22.22 6.73 57.90 SHANTHI NAGAR AND 20 THAYUMANASAMY 58 78 71.76 35.88 27.27 8.61 6.20 3.10 3.1 38.98 30.37 8.61 77.96 NAGAR 21 HARIJAN COLONY 59 50 46.00 23.00 17.48 5.52 1.56 0.78 0.78 23.78 18.26 5.52 47.56
TOTAL 2515 2313.80 1156.90 879.24 277.66 372.14 186.07 186.07 1342.97 1065.31 277.66 2685.94 11
Madurai Municipal Corporation INTRODUCTION
BRIEF DISCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT
Madurai City is one of the Million Plus cities selected for Infrastructural development and for developing governance. It is located at about 500 Km from Chennai. It has population of 928869 as per 2001 Census with an Area of 51.90 Sq.Km. The Corporation is comprises of 72 Wards with 4 Zones. It has 208 Slums with Population of 3.03 Lakhs as per 2001 Census.
As per the guidelines of JNNURM a City Development Plan for Madurai City has been prepared for Rs. 2360.94 Crores and is approved by JNNURM. The MOA for the same also been signed. Further for improving Urban Agglomeration areas another CDP is prepared and is under finalization. In this sanctioned CDP an amount of Rs. 4276.18 Crores has been allocated for the Development of Services to Urban basic poor in Madurai City. The main scope of this project will be Integrated Development of Slums through projects of providing shelter basic services and other related civic amenities with a view of providing utilities to Urban Poor. The overall project has been classified as two categories, which are broadly classified as follows. Category - I Providing Infrastructure facilities to the existing Slums and up gradation of existing house and construction of New House on site. Category - II Resettlement and Rehabilitation of Unauthorized Slums. The project Under Category I will be prepared and executed by Madurai Corporation and in respect of project under category II will be prepared and executed by TNSCB. As per 2001 Census there were 3.03 Lakhs of Slum dewellers in the city constituting 36% of the total City Population. The recent study reveals that, there are 208 are there within Madurai City. The Slums are spread over an area of about 10 Sq.km with 96.05 K.m road lengths.
13 Most of the Slums are covered with basic amenities Infrastructure facilities partially and covered with socio economic development schemes like SJSRY, Marriage loans, Loan for setting of small enterprises for urban poor. Now in this project it is proposed to be covered each slum with, shelter and Infrastructure facility so as to cover fully and then the area will be notified as Slum free.
Under Category –I Madurai Corporation has proposed project for 21slums as Phase – I at a cost of Rs.26.861 Crores and under Category II Tamilnadu Slum Clearance Board has proposed 1000 Nos. of New Houses for Body line Slum and 620 Nos. of Houses for Periyar Nagar dilapidated Houses at a cost of Rs. 39.88 Crores as Phase II. Housing in Madurai City Housing condition in slums are found very poor and large proportion of house holds were found staying in Kutcha houses and the percentage of house hold staying in RCC is very less. In the proposal after the detailed survey it is identified that 2515 nos of families have been selected to replace damages thatched roof and tiled roof at a cost of Rs.23.138 crores. Each dwelling unit having 25 Sq.m. cost works out to Rs.92,000/ per unit based on current PWD schedule of rate (2006 07). It is proposed to construct new houses with RR masonry, Brick works and RCC for roof. Madurai Corporation is proposed to construct shelter with 25 Sq.m of area with two rooms the beneficiary either own or porumpoku land. The scheme will completed within the period of two years. Infrastructure services Slums in Madurai City is lacking of proper infrastructure facilities. The existing infrastructure facilities are detailed as below. 1) Water Supply The main source of Water Supply for the city as well as slum area is the scheme with Vaigai Dam as source from which treated water quantity of 68 MLD is being drawn and distributed to the city through a network of distribution system. Generally all the 21 Slums selected under this Phase I have been covered with distribution system. Also these areas have been included for revamping the existing pipeline as a separate project under JNNURM. In all 206 Slums 2548 Nos. of water tapes have been provided. The dependency of stand post is high. In this proposal 7 Nos. of Mini Pump Scheme is proposed at the cost of Rs.10.50 lakhs.
14 Sewerage and Sanitation In all 21 Slums UGD facility is partially covered under NRCP, under UGD Programme. However these areas were included in the project of providing UGD facilities in omitted streets and extension area separately, hence no proposal has been provided in this Phase. However, regarding sanitation facilities in all 208 slums only 74 ISPs is existed. Now in this proposal for 21 slums 2 Nos. of community Toilets have been proposed at the cost of Rs. 7.20 lakhs. Roads The 208 slums in Madurai City spreaded over at about 10 Sq.Km. with 96.05 Km of road length. In this project improvement to Road to the length of 2.8 Km is proposed at at cost of Rs.68.29 lakhs. Storm Water Drain Slums in Madurai City are not provided with adequate pucca Storm Water Drain. The Kucha Drains in some of the slums are in damaged condition. In this proposals for 21 slums some of the slums have been covered with Storm Water Drain while laying C.C. Roads under NSDP however Storm Water Drain for a length of 4.90 Km is proposed at a cost of Rs.254.50 lakhs. Solid Waste Management For Madurai City including 208 Slums clusters an integrated Solid Waste Management project is being formulated under JNNURM as a separate project. Hence no proposal is proposed in this project. Street Light In 208 Slum area in Madurai City there are 990 Nos. of Street Lights are there. However in this proposal for 21 Slums it is proposed to provide 259 Nos. of Street Lights at a cost of Rs.14.5 lakhs. Community Hall In this proposal only two Slums have no vicinity to Community Hall out of 21 Slums. Hence it is proposed to provide two nos of Community Hall at a cost of Rs.11.85 lakhs. Social Security Schemes for Slum Improvement Major slum improvement programs are being implemented in Madurai viz., National Slum Development Program (NSDP), Swarna Jayanti Shehari Rojgar Yojna (SJSRY), Slum Improvement Schemes under TNUDP loan, and Accelerated Slum Improvement Scheme.
15 Swarna Jayanti Shehari Rojgar Yojna (SJSRY) Swarna Jayanti Shehari Rojgar Yojana (SJSRY) is central and state government sponsored scheme started in Madurai. The main programs in this scheme are: Development of Women and Children in Urban Areas (DWCUA): This scheme is distinguished by the special incentive extended to urban poor women who decide to set up self employment ventures as a group as opposed to individual effort. Groups of poor women shall take up an economic activity suited to their skill, training, aptitude and local conditions. Besides generations of income, their group shall strive to empower the urban poor women by making them independent as also providing a facilitation atmosphere for self employment. Under this program, groups of women devise a project plan. A successful plan will receive a subsidy from the government and a loan from an area bank branch. To be eligible for subsidy under this scheme, the DWCUA group should consist of at least 10 urban poor women. The loan is 45 percent of the project cost (maximum), the subsidy is 50 percent (maximum), and the remaining 5 percent are borne by the group. The maximum project size supported is Rs. 2,50,000. During this year under this scheme 25 lakhs have been sanctioned for 23 groups. Thrift & Credit Societies: This program brings together 10 20 women from Below Poverty Line families to carry out saving and lending activities. The government gives a lump sum grant to the group after it has been functioning for one full year. The grant is determined at the rate of Rs. 1,000 per member and is to be used as a revolving fund. Under this scheme Rs.21 lakhs have been sanctioned for 2014 beneficiaries. Urban Skill Training: This component sponsors skill development in a variety of service and manufacturing trades as well as in local skills and local crafts. After being trained, beneficiaries should be able to set up self employment ventures or secure salaried employment with enhanced remuneration. Training institutions such as ITIs/ Polytechnics/ Shramik Vidyapeeths/ Engineering Colleges and other suitable training institution run by Government, private, or voluntary organizations may be utilized and provided support for this purpose (but they must be registered with the concerned government department). Training includes computer skills, beautician skills, car driving, screen printing, doll making, tailoring, TV & radio repair, electrical equipment repair, candle making, detergent and soap making and book binding.
16 Training is limited to an expense of Rs. 2,000 per student, including a Rs. 300 stipend. For trainees successfully completing their courses, the scheme can provide up to Rs. 600 for a toolkit. Some institutes place candidates in jobs. During this year 150 nos of Trainees have been Trained up at a cost of Rs. 3.00 lakhs. Community Structure Component (CSC): This component provides a budget for working with other government agencies and departments to address needs of the eligible population beyond jobs and income. National Slum Development Program (NSDP): Under this program, the central and state government provide 50 percent of the project cost while the local body has to bear the remaining 50 percent. The works are finalised by the decision of the council. They are inspected by the RD. through the Regional Engineer. Special Priority is given to the following: Improvement of Drinking Water Supply System Laying/Relaying of Roads Provision of Street Lights Drainage Facilities Improvement and New Public Conveniences with Water Supply Welfare (education, etc.); and Shelter Upgradation (Individual Water Connections) Total Cost of the proposal for 21 slums under Phase I is works out Rs.26.8594 Crores with Central share of Rs.13.4297 Crores, State share of Rs.10.6531 Crores and Beneficiaries contribution is Rs. 2.776 Crores.
17
PROFORMA –1 1. CITY LEVEL DETAILS
Sl. No. Description
Madurai is the second largest city in Tamil Nadu and is also considered as the cultural capital of Tamil Nadu. The altitude of the city is 101 meters above the sea level. The climate during the Details about the City to be summer is 37.1 C at the maximum and 25.0 C at selected the minimum and during Winter 29.0 C at the maximum and 20.0C at the minimum and the average rainfall is 85 cms. The city extends to an area of 51.96 Sq.Km. and as per the 2001 census the population is 9.28 Lakhs. 1. State TAMIL NADU Total Slum Population in the 2. 1981 1991 2001 State and its percentage Popu. % Popu. % Popu. % 28332178 45.40 Name of the town / city 3. MADURAI CITY selected Total Slum Population of the a. City and its percentage with 1981 1991 2001 total population Popu. % Popu. % Popu. % 219850 26.7 264320 28 303141 32.60 b. Total Area of the City 51.96 Sq.Km. Housing Shortage in the City 4. 1981 1991 2001 (Category wise) Popu. % Popu. % Popu. % Catagory 219850 26.7 264320 28 303141 32.60 1)Squatter 4678 6952 8135 2) up gradation 28724 30809 35771 Total 33400 38100 43906 5. SERVICE AVAILABLE ACCESSIBILITY TO SAFE 5.1 Total Percentage WATER 1. Augmentation WSS from Vaigai Dam / 68 MLD 1 Nos. 50 % 2. Head Works in Vaigai River a) Melakkal – 10 MLD 2 Nos (Seasonal} 9 % b) Thatchampathu – 2 MLD c) Hand Pump & Power 4 %
18 Sl. No. Description
Pump – 5 MLD List out all the potential water sources in the city/town 1. Augmentation WSS from 50 % Vaigai Dam / 68 MLD 2 Nos. 2. Melakkal 10 MLD 9% 3. Thatchampathu – 2 MLD 4. Hand Pump & Power 4 % Pump – 5 MLD List out the area covered with About 80 % of the area is being covered with piped water supply piped Water Supply. List out the area which is not About 20 % of the area is being covered with covered with any water Water Lorry Mini Power Pump. supply from government
sources Total Water Supply in the city 85 MLD 63 % Total Demand for Present Population = 135 MLD Identify the gaps in the Total Demand for Ultimate Population = 226 MLD existing water supply Gap for the Present Population = 55 MLD Gap for the Ultimate Population = 146 MLD No.of Individual connection 82,780 61 % Assessed Household - No. of Household covered 53638 Slum Household 39 % with public taps - 62057 No. of Household covered Nil with Hand Pumps No. of Household with no All households have been covered with either one accessibility to water of the above sources and by Lorry Supply. UNDERGROUND WATER 5.2 1981 1991 2001 TABLE Total ground water availability in the city / town 5.3 SEWERAGE CONNECTION Total Percentage Detail out the area covered with sewerage connection in 626 Km. 94 % the city/town Ultimate disposal point of 27 MLD 26 % sewerage Omitted Streets – 14 Detail out the area not Km. covered with sewerage Including 8 % connection Extension Area – 39 Km. 5.4 SEPTIC TANK Detail out the area covered 26594 11.5 % with septic tank connection Detail out the area not covered either by septic tank connection 5.5 STORM WATER DRAINS
19 Sl. No. Description
Detail out the area covered 169 Km. 28 % with Storm Water Drain Detail out the area not covered with Storm Water 446 Km. 72 % Drain Ultimate disposal point of Disposal Point for Storm Water Drain is either drain Channel or River Course. 5.6 WATER LOGGED AREAS List out the water logged Area Lying North of Area Lying South of area in the city River Vaigai: River Vaigai: 1) Alwarpuram. 1) Thaikkal Street 2) Sellur 2) Oppulapatidurai 3) Suyarajapuram 3) Kiruthumal Channel 4) Meenambalpuram 4) Anna Thoppu 5) Pandalkudi Channel 5) Patichiyamman 6) B.B. Kulam Padithurai 7) Thirpavudiyar Kovil 6) Sugam Pallivasal 8) Thatheneri Padithurai & 9) Gandhi Nagar Thoppu Ismalipuram 10) Bharath Nagar, Press Colony 5.7 SOLID WASTE Total waste generated in the 450 MT city Total waste collected in the 410 MT 91 % city Detail out the area where 91 %areas have been take care which includes waste collection is taking Temple area, City Core area, Market & Bus Stand care Detail out the area where 9 % of the un cleared Garbage will be cleared in waste collection is not taking the next day process of Collection. place Location of sites for disposal Disposal Site (Vellakkal Near Sewage Farm) / management of waste located at about 16 Km. from City Core Area. 5.8 ELECTRIC CONNECTION Total Percentage Number of House holds covered under electric 227775 99.95 % connection No. of Households not covered with electric -- 0.05 % connection Provide detail of the area Almost all area in the city limit were covered with covered with the electric Electric Connections. connection Provide detail of the area not Only a traceable have to be covered with Electric covered with electric Connections. connection 5.9 COMMUNICATION Total Percentage Provide detail of the are covered with the telephone 100 % Coverage connection
20 Sl. No. Description
Provide detail of the area not covered with telephone -- connection 5.10 PUBLIC TRANSPORT Total Percentage Provide details of the public transport in the city/town 30 Sq.Km. 57.70 % (model split) Provide details of the private transport in the city/town 16 Sq.Km. 30.80% (model split) Detail out the slum area covered by public transport Nil system Detail out the slum area not 5.96 Sq.Km. 11.50 % covered by transport system 5.11 STREET LIGHTS Total Percentage Detail out the roads in the 649 Km. (inclusive of area covered with Street 97.60 % NH Road) Lights Detail out the roads not 16 Km. 2.40 % covered with Street Lights 5.12 EXISTING STREETS Detail out the roads in the 577 Km. 93.50 % area with paved streets Detail out the area not 39 Km. 6.50 % covered with paved streets Note: All the Services should be shown on the city map. Criteria for selection for 6 a. particular town / city Slum Population of the city b. and percentage to total city 1981 1991 2001 population Popu. % Popu. % Popu. % 219850 26.7 264320 28 303141 32.60 c. No. of Slum Clusters 1981 1991 2001 No. Popu. No. Popu. No. Popu. 185 219850 198 264320 208 303141 d. Area of Slum Clusters 1981 1991 2001 Popu. Area Popu. Area Popu. Area Details of the last municipal Election to the Councilors, Zonal Chariman 7 election Dy. Mayor & Mayor were conducted & elected. Total seats of councilor in the a. 72 seats municipality No. of elected councilors in b. the selected municipality at 72 Nos. present 8. No. of Slum ward in the Ward No. 31
21 Sl. No. Description
Municipality
Number of people below the poverty line in slum pockets 9. 1981 1991 2001 and their percentage to slum population Popu. % Popu. % Popu. % 219850 100 264320 100 303141 100 Master Plan / Zonal Plan 10. recommendations for the area where slums exists. Detail out the activities done IEC Activity awareness programme and cultural 11. by the NGOs and CBOs in activities in slum area where conducted in co the slum cluster selected. ordination with Rotary Clubs Exnora etc., Note: Funds will only be provided to those towns cities where elections of the local bodies have been held and elected bodies are in position. State may allocate funds on the basis of total urban slum population of the city/town to the total state slum population. In prioritization of the towns and the cities the criteria should be adopted on their felt needs. While prioritizing the towns, States would take into account existing infrastructure, economically and socially disadvantaged sections of the slum population and difficult areas.
22 PROFORMA – 2 2.1 Various Components of Schemes S.No. Description
Name of the schemes Please put a tick mark against Schemes selected 1 Provision of shelter including up gradation & Construction of new houses. (On site √ improvement) 2 Slum relocation 3 Provision of community toilets/baths √ 4 Provision of physical amenities √ Access to safe water supply √ Sewerage √ Drainage/ storm water drains √ Solid waste collection √ Widening and paving of existing lanes √ Street lights, etc. √ 5 Community Infrastructure like provision of Community centers 6 Community Primary Health Care Center Buildings √ 7 Social Amenities like preschool education Preschool education Non formal education Adult education Maternity center 8 Project development Framework Public private partnership in housing and infrastructure development Housing supplied by Developer/Contractors 9 Sites and Services schemes
23 CONTENTS 1.0 BACKGROUND 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.1.1 Urbanization and Migration 1 1.1.2 Economic Development and Urban Poverty 1 1.1.3 City Management and Good Governance 1 1.1.4 Need to strengthen the Access to Urban Services 2 1.1.5 Past Attempts towards Poverty Alleviation 3 1.2 Need, Objectives and Scope of services 4 1.2.1 Need for the Assignment 4 1.2.2 Objectives 5 1.2.3 Scope of Services 5 1.3 Slum Improvement and Upgrading Issues and Prospects 6 1.3.1 The Challenge 6 1.3.2 Slums Nature and Characteristic 7 1.3.3 Initiatives and Trends in Slum Upgrading 7 1.3.4 Critical Development Issues Involved in Slum Upgrading 8 1.3.5 Slum Upgrading Action Plan of the Cities Alliance 9 1.3.6 Experiences and lessons learnt 10 1.3.7 Select Indian Case Studies on Slum Upgrading 11 2.0 PROJECT AREA PROFILE 14 2.1 Madurai History and Growth 14 2.2 Madurai Corporation Regional Setting 14 2.2.1 Regional Links 14 2.2.2 Physical Features 14 2.2.3 City Management and Governance 15 2.2.4 Demography and Density 15 2.3 Socio Economic Characteristics 17 2.3.1 Workforce Ratio 17 2.3.2 Industrial Development 17 2.3.3 Employment 18 2.4 Land and Housing 18 2.5 social Capital 19
24 2.6 Health 19 2.7 Education 20 2.8 City Management and Urban Governance 20 3.0 URBAN PLANNING AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT 26 3.1 Overview 26 3.2 Master Plan Implementation and Implications 26 3.3 Existing Land use 27 3.4 Development Patterns Growth Areas and Directions 28 3.5 Growth Constrains and Developmental Potentials 29 3.6 Key Developmental Issues 30 4.0 INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES 31 4.1 Water Supply 31 4.2 Sewerage and Sanitation 34 4.3 Storm Water Drains and Rejuvenation of Water Bodies 37 4.4 Solid Waste Management 39 4.5 Transportation and Traffic Management 44 4.6 Traffic and Transportation 46 4.7 Street Lighting 48 4.8 Social Infrastructure 49 5.0 MUNICIPAL FINANCE 52 5.1 Finances of Madurai Corporation 52 5.2 Financial Status 52 5.3 Revenue Account 54 5.4 Capital Account 60 5.5 Assets and Liabilities 61 5.6 Key Financial Indicators and Issues 62 5.7 Key Issues 64 6.0 SLUM SITUATION 66 6.1 Overview 66 6.2 Services provision in Slums 68 6.2.1 Housing 68
25 6.2.2 Infrastructure Services 68 6.2.3 Key Indicators and Issues 69 6.2.4 Issues 70 6.3 Poverty alleviation and community Development 70 6.4 Slum Improvement Schemes 70 6.5 Tenement Scheme 72
26
1 BACKGROUND 1.1 INTRODUCTION 1.1.1 Urbanization and Migration A century of industrialization and technical advancement has brought in rapid urbanization. If urbanization, as a phenomenon has registered a steady progress among the developed nations, ‘urbanization explosion’ is taking place in the developing countries. Urban growth and problems arising out of it is one of the major concerns of the planners and governments all over the world. The proportion of urban population in India has gone up from 11 percent in 1901 to 18 percent in 1951 and to 32 percent in 2001. Had it formed a separate country, urban India alone would have been the fourth most populous country of the world after China, India and United States of America (Visaria, 1997). 1.1.2 Economic Development and Urban Poverty The insufficient employment opportunities and inadequate income among a considerable segment of urban population in India has given rise to urban poverty1. Despite the opportunities and new possibilities that the cities present due to the development process brought through urbanization, it is estimated that over 30 percent of India’s urban population live below the poverty line2. Such a high degree of urban poverty highlights a serious dimension of the country’s contemporary urban scenario. The miserable economic plight does not allow the poor to live in authorized residential areas and compel them to stay in slums. Particularly in big cities, the slums are rapidly proliferating, which eloquently symbolizes the disturbing magnitude of urban poverty. Therefore, urban poverty in Indian scenario is reflected not only in lack of productive employment, but also inadequate living conditions and degraded environment3. 1.1.3 City Management and Good Governance Governing the urban areas is difficult. The urban leaders must balance many competing demands and conflicting interests. A fundamental dilemma that confronts urban leaders is that they must produce visible outcomes that improve urban welfare while dealing with multiple, often competing interests in a transparent, a consultative, and an accountable manner. To compound the challenge of urban governance, urban populations are also the most politically volatile. Urban populations have both higher needs and demands for services
1 Brian C. Aldrich and Ravinder S. Sandhu, Housing for the Urban Poor, New Delhi, Sage Publications, 1995 2 C. H. Hanumantha Rao, ‘Agricultural Growth, Sustainability and Poverty Alleviation’, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. XXXIII, Nos. 29 and 30, 1998 3 National Commission on Urbanization, Report II, New Delhi, 1998
27 and infrastructure. Furthermore, high literacy and politically informed through education exposure and media, mobilize them for political action making them politically active and influential. As a result, urban government works under the pressure of enormous challenges and in a highly politicized environment. Thus, public officials in urban areas find themselves under intense pressure from two sides: a result oriented performance producing tangible improvements in quality of life for the citizens and at the same time dealing with the active interests both organized and unorganized. Priorities are also set in here with city size and the per capita figures often mislead resulting negligence of growth of small and medium sized towns. As a result, poor, marginalized and unrepresentative section gets a raw deal. The result of good governance is development that ‘gives priority to poor, advances the cause of women, sustains the environment, and creates needed opportunities for employment and other livelihoods’ Source: Re conceptualizing Governance, UNDP, 1997 Pp1 Thus, the crux of good governance is to achieve self sustainability in terms of technical and financial management so as to ensure transparency in governance, provide improved access to the services and facilities to the all and improved quality of life of the citizens. 1.1.4 Need to Strengthen the Access to Urban Services It is quite clear that in recent times, urban population growth has been fuelled by prospects of higher incomes and also contributes to the growth process at large. It is unfortunate to notice that the cities failed to deliver the promise of a better quality of life to the expectations. Despite the higher incomes of urban populations, the quality of basic services remained poor resulting deterioration in the physical environment and quality of life by the widening gap between demand and supply of essential services and infrastructure. The urban poor lack adequate access to services like water supply, sewerage, low cost housing, education and public health. Thus the urban poor in general and the population living in the slum settlements in particular have been affected most adversely by urban service deficiencies. Further, rapid urban growth is inhibiting the urban local bodies to deliver adequate services and where services are adequate; the urban poor are generally deprived off the access. The access of urban poor to basic urban services has been constrained by many socio economic, administrative and political factors4. In many programmes designed to help the poor due to non affordability of the poor to pay for because of low incomes. Due to these contradictions, even where these services are provided by the urban local bodies, the real beneficiaries are generally other than urban poor and poor administrative and institutional set up characterized by inadequate people’s participation in identifying priorities and needs. Thus the access of the urban poor to the important decision makers in urban areas is very limited and without effective community participation, the urban
4 Kundu, 1993; De Wit, 1996; Hanumappa, 1991
28 poor are unable to safeguard their legitimate interests. 1.1.5 Past Attempts towards Poverty Alleviation In the past, various approaches have been adopted to address the problems of urban poor. For example, the Participatory Urban Services Project in Asia funded by International Development Research Centre (IDRC) focused on different ways of the urban poor improved their physical and social environment when basic services were found to be deficient. It was found that poor often organized themselves into self help groups and it was noticed that harnessing of community resources through such participatory, self help and co operative styles helped in narrowing the gap between the demand and supply of urban services in low income communities. This experience demonstrated that there exists a positive relationship between strong leadership and successful service delivery. In order to alleviate the urban poverty in the country, the Union Ministry of Urban Affairs and Employment (formerly known as Ministry of Urban Development) has launched a number of slum improvement and Urban Poverty Alleviation Programmes (UPAPs). Some of such prominent programmes include: Environment Improvement of Urban Slums (EIUS), Swarna Jayanthi Sahari Rojgar Yojana (SJSRY) Integrated Development of Small and Medium Towns (IDSMT), Integrated Low Cost Sanitation Scheme (ILCS), Comprehensive Slum Improvement Programme (CSIP) Urban Community Development (UCD), Prime Minister’s Integrated Urban Poverty Eradication Programme (PMIUPEP), Small Enterprise for Urban Poor (SEUP), Urban Basic Services for the Poor (UBSP) and Nehru Rojgar Yojana (NRY). These programmes are based on the recognition of the potential contribution that urban poor are capable of making in society and the alarming proportion they are going to assume in the future. They also seek to link employment generation with infrastructure development. Recent approaches with a line of thinking that direct attack on poverty is needed to improve the living standards of urban poor and it has been established that the degree of awareness among the citizens in poverty alleviation programmes and their utilization rates are closely interlinked. Often, from various experiences, it is established that focused targeting leads to complex eligibility criteria, thereby reducing opportunities for the needy to benefit from various poverty alleviation programmes. Thus, the success is established only through simple organizational structure, cost effective solutions and is identified with the needs of the target groups. Thus, it may be concluded that community participation, to a great extent, would ensure the success of any/all UPAPs. Further, reinforcing the need, the 74th Constitutional Amendment Act 1992 strengthened the decentralized administration focusing the implementation of these UPAPs at the city level with
29 the active involvement of the municipalities. The local offices of these programmes are mostly located in the buildings of their municipalities where the municipal officials work for them. The rational for municipal intervention is based on the comparative advantages of these bodies in terms of local knowledge and choice, local accountability of management and the capability to recover the costs of urban infrastructure from the beneficiaries through local taxes and charges. On the basis of field observations in some select cities, the government’s findings indicate that the UPAPs have contributed in improving the infrastructure, labor productivity and social service in urban areas5. For essential services, a significant proportion of slum dwellers are willing to pay more provided they are assured of reliability and responsiveness. Of the slum dwellers who do not have a water tap, 60 percent in Pune are willing to pay an average of Rs. 381 per household to have on installed. Similarly, 71 percent in Ahmedabad and Bangalore are willing to pay Rs. 120 and Rs. 550 respectively. Clearly, these numbers are tentative and need to be probed in depth. Amounts offered by no means will cover the full costs of the facilities being sought. Nevertheless, they point to fruitful policy alternatives for the future. There is potential here for the expanded use of available low cost technologies not only by public agencies but also by the private sectors. Needless to say, there is much scope for encouraging self reliance in the urban poor while subsidizing the needy in imaginative ways. It is sad to note that though latent demand exists for these high priority services and people are willing to pay, there is no dynamic public or private programme that has responded to the challenge on a large scale. Source: Samuel Paul, Report Card on Three Indian Cities, Public Services for the Urban Poor, Public affairs Centre, Bangalore, 1995 Besides, it is also noticed that these programmes have generated considerable consciousness among the urban local bodies about the gravity of the urban poverty and the significance of these programmes for its alleviation. The UPAPs have led the urban local bodies and the councilors to realize the serious nature of poverty and motivated them to take interest in the functioning and the viability of these programmes for reducing the urban poverty. 1.2 NEED, OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE OF SERVICES 1.2.1 Need for this Assignment We understand from the discussion with the officials of the ULB and Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board (TNSCB) that no comprehensive surveys were conducted by the ULB till date. As per Census 2001 and Data available from the ULB, Madurai City consists of 208 slums, out of which 64 slums are notified. ULB figures for Slum Population indicates that approximately 60,257 households reside in the Slums accommodating 2.7 lakhs population. Presently more slums have been notified, thus taking the tally to approximately 80 notified slums The Government of Tamil Nadu (through the TNSCB) has taken up various
5 Government of India, Annual Report 1993-94, New Delhi, Ministry of Urban Development, 1995
30 measures to improve the living conditions of the urban poor living in the slums and also has rehabilitated urban poor living in the river margins and objectionable places. Some of such measures included formulation of slum policy for the State of Tamil Nadu, formation of Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board (TNSCB), to act as a nodal agency to implement various housing, slum improvement and rehabilitation and resettlement programmes to improve the living conditions of the urban slum families, and various development programs to improve the living conditions of the urban poor living in the slums. In continuing efforts to augment the development initiatives a fresh survey of slums (Notified and Un notified) has to be carried out by ULB in an effort to formulate both short term and long term strategies for future, particularly with a view identity the environmental infrastructure needs of the urban poor living within the slums of the Madurai Municipal Corporation area. 1.2.2 Objectives The objectives of this assignment as per the JnNURM guidelines are: To conduct a survey to identify the slums in Madurai Municipal Corporation area and categorize them into: Slums in unobjectionable areas; Slums in objectionable areas; and Slums in private land areas. To list the number of households in each of these locations; To assess the environmental infrastructure needs of the slums in the unobjectionable areas with a view to improve the living conditions of the urban poor; and To identify the owners / the legal steps needed to purchase the land and devise any private public partnership in developing the slums, in case of slums located on private land. 1.2.3 Scope of Services Following is the scope of services defined in the IHSDP guidelines to accomplish the above stated objectives of this assignment: Prepare a survey sketch to show the actual dimension of the proposed site / scheme area to identify the survey numbers, village numbers, block numbers, etc., as per the revenue records and to know the extent of the proposed site as it serves as the basic sketch for any proposed development; Prepare a topographical sketch to cover the existing surrounding developments in and around the proposed site/scheme area to a radius of about 500 m, to provide the details of the existing structures within the scheme area such as pucca/kutcha houses, existing low tension and high tension lines, street lights, taps, roads, trees, etc., and to provide existing levels wherever the site is sloped or uneven or with difficult geometries; Categorization of the slum area into: Slums in unobjectionable areas; Slums in objectionable areas; and Slums in private land areas. Prepare a survey format and conduct the survey in the areas identified in the
31 above task; Identify the deficiency in services in the slum areas by adopting a participatory planning approach in case of slums in objectionable areas and in case of slums located on private land/properties, after arriving at the details of owners and the clear title of the land; and In case of slums in objectionable areas, identify the number of families to be rehabilitated and also option relating selection of rehabilitation sites within the local body area in consultation with the municipal authorities. The scope of this assignment is limited to the Madurai Municipal Corporation area 1.3 SLUM IMPROVEMENT AND UPGRADING - ISSUES AND PROSPECTS 1.3.1 The Challenge Cities in developing countries have faced an unprecedented rate of urbanization and increasing poverty. The result rampant proliferation of slums. These are unplanned and under served neighborhoods typically settled by squatters without legal recognition or rights. The slum residents lack the most basic municipal services, such as water supply, sanitation, and waste collection and thus are exposed to disease, crime and natural disasters. They also lack schools, clinics, as well as places for the community to meet and socialize. Slum and squatter settlements are growing at alarming rates, projected to double in 25 years. Slums are the products of failed policies, bad governance, corruption, inappropriate regulation, dysfunctional land markets, unresponsive financial systems, and a fundamental lack of political will. Each of these failures adds to the toll on people already deeply burdened by poverty and constrains the enormous opportunity for human development that urban life offers. In many countries there has been a dramatic shift in governance with local governments taking greater responsibility for the provision of municipal services. With democratization, local governments are able to respond more effectively to the needs of their population. Local government has more power and is more interested in what happens in slums given the increasing voting power of poor communities. A strong NGO sector is now in place and works more effectively with government. Slum communities are often politically mature and able and willing to pay for services. It is also clear that with economic growth, in many economies, the disparities between the haves and the have nots are increasing. The lack of basic environmental services in rapidly growing, dense urban and peri urban settlements have resulted in public health and safety hazards. Programs to enfranchise the urban poor have high social priority. National and city governments have tried to deal with this phenomenon and have responded to the poor in different ways. Yet, often they failed because of the idea that poor cannot pay for services. These devastatingly neglected are of cities in the developing world are the result of dysfunctional land and housing markets. 1.3.2 Slums - Nature & Characteristics
32 Following are some of the key characteristics and nature of slums existent around the world: Slums are neglected parts of cities where housing and living conditions are appallingly poor. Slums range from high density, squalid central city tenements to spontaneous squatter settlements without legal recognition or rights, sprawling at the edge of cities. Some are more than fifty years old; some are land invasions just underway. Slums have various names, Favelas, Kampungs, Bidonvilles, Tugurios; yet share the same miserable living conditions. Slums do not have basic municipal services like water, sanitation, waste collection, storm drainage, street lighting, paved footpaths, roads for emergency access schools and clinics within easy reach, safe areas for children to play places for the community to meet and socialize. Slums are worsening while the average age of city population is increasing, the average age of slum dwellers is decreasing, so youths and children suffer most visible disparities between slums and better off neighborhoods increase the social tensions in poorer areas unplanned growth of settlements makes conventional service provision complicated and costly. 1.3.3 Initiatives and Trends in Slum Upgrading The alternative to moving people or replacing their homes is upgrading. Upgrading rejuvenates the existing community with minimum disruption and loss of physical and social assets. Typically, approaches consist of providing security from eviction and improving the existing infrastructure. For example, water reticulation, sanitation, garbage collection, storm drainage and security lighting, up to an appropriate, basic standard. It also involves the improvement of footpaths and streets, playgrounds and community facilities. Usually upgrading excludes home construction, since the residents can do this themselves, but instead sometimes, offers optional loans for home improvements of clinics and schools. An essential part of upgrading is transferring these tenure rights has been shown to motivate occupants to invest two to four times the amount of funds that the government invests in infrastructure improvements in a slum area. Slum upgrading consists of physical, social, economic, organizational and environmental improvements undertaken cooperatively and locally among citizens, community groups, businesses and local authorities. Following are some of the actions involved in slum upgrading: Installing or improving basic infrastructure like water reticulation, sanitation/ waste collection, and rehabilitation of circulation, storm drainage and flood prevention, electricity, security lighting, and public telephones; Removal or mitigation of environmental hazards; Providing incentives for community management and maintenance; Constructing or rehabilitating community facilities such as nurseries, health posts, community open space; Regularizing security of tenure; Home improvement; Relocation/compensation for the small number of residents dislocated by the
33 improvements; Improving access to health care and education as well as social support programs to address issues of security, violence, substance abuse, etc.; Enhancement of income earning opportunities through training and micro credit; and Building social capital and the institutional framework to sustain improvements. Another aspect of upgrading is the positive effect of the community participation in the process of regeneration. Upgrading, when done well, can strengthen the communities’ voice and ability to transform its condition. A successful upgrading program is more than infrastructure. It creates city citizens. Experience shows that for every dollar of infrastructure invested in upgrading; residents in home improvements and small business expansion invest about seven dollars. As a whole, the slum upgrading has two significant advantages, viz. a) it is not only an affordable alternative to clearance and relocation (which cost more than 10 times more as upgrading), but it minimizes as well the disturbance to the social and economic life of the community, and b) the results of upgrading are highly visible, immediate and make a significant difference in the quality of life of the urban poor. 1.3.4 Critical Development Issues involved in Slum Upgrading The World Bank, the regional development banks, the United Nations (Habitat, UNICEF, UNDP and ILO, in particular), most bilateral donors, and thousands of NGOs and community groups have gained immense experience over the last 25 years in implementing projects designed to upgrade slums worldwide. A large number of these projects have successfully demonstrated that slums and the lives of their residents can be improved. Considerable knowledge has been gained as to what works best, but very few of these projects have been scaled up to citywide or nationwide programs. In fact urban slum conditions are qualitatively and quantitatively worsening worldwide. The lessons from this experience make it clear that moving from pilot slum upgrading projects to citywide and nationwide scales of action is absolutely necessary. But that will require tackling the following critical development issues: Good Governance the capacity of local governments must be strengthened to carry out their responsibility for the equitable provision of infrastructure and services to all urban residents while planning for future growth. The capacity of provincial, state and national authorities must be strengthened to ensure their critical normative roles, to establish facilitating policy environments, and to rid corruption from land markets and the provision of public services. Legal System property rights and security of tenure are critical to sustainable approaches to upgrading. Most residents of urban slums live without any form of secure tenure, under constant threat of eviction, which vitiates their ability to access credit and constrains their motivation to improve their homes and neighborhoods. Financial System coupled with security of tenure, access to credit is key to unleashing the vast potential of the urban poor to improve their living and
34 working environments and livelihoods. Micro credit and other facilities to expand access to credit to the poor can provide critical elements of institutional support in creating financially self supporting and sustainable urban upgrading programs. Social Framework community participation in the conception, development, financing, upgrading and maintenance of infrastructure and services is a critical element of sustainable programs. Experience has shown that the most successful programs address community priorities. Communities must be enfranchised through knowledge sharing and security of their civil rights. 1.3.5 Slum Upgrading Action Plan of the Cities Alliance This critical action plan aims at improved basic municipal services for 100 million people over the next twenty years. The plan focuses on upgrading the most squalid, unhealthy, unserved and vulnerable urban slums and squatter settlements, which are found worldwide. This plan would commit interested parties in the international community to an ambitious, yet highly targeted effort to change the lives of slum dwellers worldwide. It calls for long term commitment, a ratcheting up of resources and a coherence of priorities, programs and organizational arrangements within each international development organization, as well as engaging committed local and national partners willing to make a concerted, results driven attack on the slum problem.
35 Key Actions of Slum Upgrading Action Plan of the Cities Alliance Strengthening the in country capacity by restructuring policy, regulatory, operating frameworks, and legal/ technical constraints to upgrading at scale; overcoming institutional bottlenecks; encouraging local commitment and resolve, including political understanding and buy in; and, strengthening learning and training; Preparing national/city upgrading programs by helping committed countries design upgrading programs to scale; Supporting regional and global knowledge and learning that capture and share the varied approaches and local practices to get the job done better with the full involvement of the affected communities; organizing networks of practice; fielding specialists to help countries and cities move to scale; Investing in slums with appropriate basic infrastructure and municipal services identified, implemented and operated with the community; Strengthening partner capacity to focus attention on the task, with emphasis on the resources, knowledge and tools to help governments and communities do the job well and at scale; and Leadership and political buy in by the partners of the Alliance to prioritize slum upgrading. 1.3.6 Experience and Lessons Learnt Evaluations of past World Bank upgrading projects show that these projects have been more successful than the average development project. Experience has shown that slum upgrading projects are associated with social and economic benefits that are particularly high. For example in a recently upgraded area of El Mezquital, Guatamala, infant mortality rates fell by 90 percent and crime by 43 percent. Regularization of land tenure results in significant private investment in these communities US$ 7 private investment for US$ 1 of public funds. These results are consistent with results in other projects. The benefits of upgrading are simply that people obtain an improved, healthy and secure living environment without being displaced. The investments they have already made to their properties remain and are enhanced this is significantly better than removing them to costlier alternatives that are less acceptable to them. Recognizing title and security of tenure makes a positive contribution both to the economic prospects of the poor, as well as to the national economy.
Lessons Learnt from Slum Upgrading Worldwide Upgrading of slums and settlements is a viable and effective way to help the urban poor solve their need for shelter and a clean, safe and healthy living environment. Local participation is critical. Projects need to be designed from the bottom up working with communities so that the communities decide what levels of service they receive. Sustainability requires that consideration be given to the costs involved and to designing a level of service that is affordable to the community and to the local government.
36 Programs must be derived from the city level and country strategies to achieve synergies with other supporting interventions addressing poverty in the country. Upgrading programs are most effective when led by the municipal authority and implemented at the community level through a broad set of intermediaries including community based organizations, NGO’s, and UN agencies such as UNICEF and Habitat. Source: Cities Alliance for Cities without Slums Action Plan for Moving Slum Upgrading to Scale Up 1.3.7 Select Indian Case Studies on Slum Upgrading Slum Sanitation Program in Mumbai, India (The World Bank) Majority of cities in India have been unsuccessful in meeting the sanitation needs of the poor. Today, one of the main challenges they face in this sector is to develop innovative approaches, alternative to the centralized provisions of sanitation services, and do this in partnership with the communities of users. This paper basically describes the positive experience of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai in implementing the World Bank assisted Slum Sanitation Program (SSP) in Partnership with the communities of slum dwellers. SSP program started in 1995 with the approval of the World Bank’s 7 year loan for the Bombay Sewage Disposal Project (BSDP) with the main objective of strengthening the capacity of the Municipal Corporation to provide sewerage services. One of its primary objectives of SSP was to ‘Improve the health and environmental conditions in Greater Mumbai including the slum dwellers’. SSP process from building the partnership to delivery and management of services. SSP defines sanitation for slums as a complex service, i.e. ‘a package of hardware and software’ components. In particular, this includes: Creation of competent CBOs capable to fully take over the management of the service, including payments of utility bills; Delivery of an information package for users on hygiene, program implementation and management; and Actual construction of the community toilet block and the provision of water supply and electricity. Under the SSP implementation, the Contractor’s very first activity was to carry out a general information campaign in all the slums in assigned wards and give awareness to the communities regarding the sanitation scheme. After this initial awareness campaign, the communities are mobilized around the different problems of sanitation and the CBOs who are registered, as organizations under the Charity Commissioner would need to obtain the legal status, which allow them to manage the community sanitation. With the accord of legal status, the CBOs would give a demonstration about SSP approach by collecting Rs. 100 per user towards the creation of a sanitation maintenance fund. Only after collecting at least 50 percent of the expected maintenance fund, the actual construction of the community toilet block can start only after the community endorse the plan for the toilet blocks and BMC give
37 building permit and once the construction is over and all utilities are in place, the CBOs would take over as local service provider through a MoU with BMC, where the BMC would ensure proper maintenance of these toilets. Chikhalwadi was the very first community toilet block, which was built under SSP scheme. Subsequently, the progress indicates completing over 85 90 sanitation schemes under the SSP and successfully handed over to the communities for management. Based on the success achieved through the SSP, the BMC is contemplating to adopt an integrated approach, combining the sanitation scheme with a water program and using sanitation as an entry point for the provisions of series of other key environmental services like solid waste disposal and drainage improvement. Parivarthan Slum Networking Project, Ahmedabad, India The ‘Self Employed Women Association (SEWA)’ is a well known local union (now a NGO), runs an all woman bank called the SEWA Bank. The SEWA has been playing a significant role in upgrading the slums communities in the city of Ahmedabad. Through the on going slum networking project, jointly financed by the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation, residents of the slum community, the World Bank and the UNDP. The program known locally as ‘Parivarthan’ (means transformation) in five slums was a great success and its rapid spread to other slum communities illustrates affordable and double nature of slum upgrading on a progressively city wide scale. It can be clearly seen in case of Ahmedabad, Parivarthan in Sanjhyanagar a slum community of 181 and Sinheswari Nagar, a slum comprises of 43 families all of whom have now been provided with individual water, sewerage and sanitation facilities, along with internal paved roads, storm water drainage and streetlights. In each case, the motivation work being done by the NGO partner (Mahila Housing SEWA Trust) has resulted in 100 per cent of community members agreeing to contribute their share of the total cost, with 90 per cent of the money already deposited with SEWA Bank. A number of donors have also shown an interest in Parivarthan. External funds, it is felt, may be used as a substitute for private sector contributions in some cases or could be channeled into the provision of trunk services that will enable Parivarthan to reach currently unserved areas of the city. The infrastructure services provided by the Parivarthan Program included the following: Roads and paving; Water supply to individual households; Underground sewerage link for individual households; Storm water drainage; Streetlights; Solid waste management; and Landscaping. In addition to the cost of providing the above services to each household within a slum, the average cost of connecting the services to the main city piped water and sewage lines was about Rs. 4,000 per dwelling. This has recently increased
38 to Rs. 5,000 due to rising costs. The cost of linking with city services is to be borne by the AMC, as part of its overall responsibility of providing municipal services throughout the city. One of the key features of this ongoing project is that communities are not mute. But the eligibility for this project was like a community must form an association and indicates its commitment by payment of the fixed contribution of Rs. 2000 per household, plus Rs. 100 towards initial maintenance expenses. In turn, the envisaged benefit is that everyone would get all infrastructure services. One of the main positive features of the Parivartan Program is that it has proved to be a very effective medium through which linkages to government subsidy schemes may be efficiently made. Due to the basic requirement of Parivartan, to organize entire slums and document the socio economic details of each household, it lends itself very well to accessing government schemes for service provision in an organized way. Currently, the state government toilet subsidy scheme (which provides Rs. 4,500 per household) has been collectively linked to the slums involved in Parivarthan. It is envisaged that more such government schemes will be linked to communities’ own efforts through Parivarthan.
39 2 PROJECT AREA PROFILE 2.1 MADURAI - HISTORY & GROWTH
Madurai, a temple town and bustling city, is the birthplace of “Tamil”, one of the oldest languages in India. The Pandiyan Empire ruled Madurai during the 14th Century, when the world famous Meenakshi Amman Temple was built. The South Bank of Vaigai River comprises the “Old Town” where Madurai was nestled and later expanded around the Temple and Tamil Sangam (Fig 2.1). Later, in the 17th Century, the Nayak Kings contributed significantly to the architectural beauty of this town. Thirumalai Nayakkar Mahal is a classic example of the fine architecture that flourished during
that period. Madurai also finds special mention in maritime trade with the greco roman empires during medieval times. Although the “Old Town” was concentrated around the Meenakshi Amman Temple (Fig 2.2) on the south bank of Vaigai River, in modern times it has expanded to cover the north bank and stands as an important trade center and gateway to southern Tamil Nadu today. 2.2 MADURAI CORPORATION – REGIONAL SETTING
2.2.1 Regional Links Madurai is well connected by Rail, Road and Air to all major cities of the state and the country. Madurai is a major railhead on the Chennai Kanyakumari Railway line. National Highways NH 7 and NH 49 pass through the center of the city.
2.2.2 Physical Features Madurai is situated approximately 100 m above MSL. The terrain of the city is Figure 2.2: Meenakshi Amman Temple gradually sloped from the north to south and west to east. Vaigai River bisects the city into the North and South zones with the north sloped towards Vaigai
40 River and the south zone sloped away from the river. Madurai city is also flanked by prominent hills on the periphery such as Anaimalai, Nagamalai, Pasumalai and Sikandearmalai. The City is situated on 900 55’ N latitude and 780 7’ E longitude. Ground water table depth varies between 61 to 91 m. The average water table is reported at approximately 76 m below ground level. The climate of Madurai town is hot and dry and temperature ranges between a maximum and minimum of 420C and 210C respectively. April through June is usually the peak summer season. Rainfall is irregular and intermittent, with an annual average of approximately 850 mm. Prevailing wind directions are from northeast during Jan – Feb, and from southwest direction during the months of May to July. Regional setting of Madurai indicating geographical location, extent of Madurai Corporation is shown in Drawing 1.0.
2.2.3 City Management & Governance The civic and sanitation Table 2.1.1: Madurai Corporation – Salient requirements of Madurai were Features managed by a City Council No. Aspect Description during the time period 1866 1. Location ° 1970. In 1970, Madurai was Latitude :9 55’ North Longitude ° upgraded to the status of a :78 7’ East 2. Neighbouring Municipal Corporation. Further in Districts : Tiruchirapalli 1974, 13 town Panchayats on the North : Dindigul & Theni outskirts of Madurai City were West : Sivaganga included in Madurai Corporation East : Virudhunagar and number of Wards was South increased to 65. 3. Total Area :51.96 sq. km 4. Total Wards : 72 In 1990, a delineation committee North Zone : 21 was formed to identify new wards South Zone : 51 and the total number of Wards 5. Population was increased from 65 to 72. Per 2001 Census : 9,28,989 Statistics pertaining to the Floating : 2,00,000 Population (Estimated) Corporation of Madurai are 6. Population furnished in Table 2.1.1: Distribution (approx.) : 28% 2.2.4. Demography and Density North Zone : 72% The present Corporation area South Zone spans an extent of approximately Source: Corporation of Madurai 51.96 sq. km. and the population per 2001 Census is 928,869 persons. Details of population growth in Madurai are furnished in Table 2.2.2. Table 2.2.2: Population Growth in Madurai Year Population Decadal Compounded Growth Rate Annual Gr. Rate Male Female Total Nos. Nos. Nos. % % 1951 183,950 177,831 361,781 1961 217,638 207,172 424,810 17.42 1.62 1971 280,927 268,187 549,114 29.36 2.60
41 1981 420,739 400,152 820,891 49.49 4.10 1991* 481,598 459,391 940,989 14.63 1.37 2001** 469,396 459,473 928,869 (1.29) (0.13) 2004# 562,250 546,505 1,108,755 1.27 Source: Census Reports & City Development Plan for Madurai (2006) Note: * Madurai district bifurcated into Madurai and Dindigul, 1984; ** Madurai district bifurcated into Madurai and Theni, 1997; # Population Enumeration by Madurai Corporation A significant increase in growth rate to 50 percent (1971–1981) can be attributed to upgradation of the ULB into a Corporation (1974) and subsequent inclusion of 13 Panchayats into corporation limits. The decline in the population growth rate between 1981 and 2001 can be attributed to bifurcation of Madurai district on two instances, into Madurai and Dindigul (1984) and subsequently into part of Theni district (1997). The Compounded Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) has reduced from 4.10 percent during 1971 81 to 1.27 percent during 1991 2004. As outlined in the City Development Plan for Madurai, the negative growth rate registered by the Corporation in the last decade as indicated in Census reports has not been reportedly resolved and remains unexplained. However, a demographic study conducted by the Corporation in 2004 registered a population of 11.08 lakh which parries with the Madurai District urban population growth rate increase of 20 percent in the last decade. As indicated by the Tourism Department, the average daily floating population in the city is 2.10 lakh persons. Administration of the City is accomplished through zone level categorization of the wards into four zones namely, North (21 wards), South (19 wards), West (16 wards) and East (16 wards). Zone level information is furnished in Table 2.2. Table 2.2: Corporation of Madurai - Zone Level Information Details North Bank of South of River Vaigai Number of River Vaigai Wards North East South West Wards (Nos.) 21 16 19 16 72 Ward List 1 to 21 44 to 59 31 43 & 22 30 & 66 1 to 72 60 65 72 Population (2004) 353,893 207,793 269,915 277,154 1,108,755 Area (sq. km) 19.50 6.12 7.40 18.78 51.96 A relative analysis of the ward density Table 2.3: Ward-level Density Pattern pattern in Corporation of Madurai based Range Density No. of Pattern Wards on ward level population per 2001 census (/Ha.) indicates that the Corporation area is Above 1000 3 Significantly saturated to a significant extent with 52 of 701 1000 10 High the total 72 wards categorized as “high” or 401 700 20 “significantly high” density. Wards with 213 400 High Density 19 moderate or low density are areas where 101 – 213 Medium 11 development is constrained by land use Below 101 Moderate Low 9 or other physical characteristics such as Source: Corporation of Madurai, Census water bodies, forest etc. The density Reports pattern of wards is furnished in Table 2.3. 2.3 Socio Economic Characteristics
42
2.3.1 Workforce Ratio According to Census 2001, the urban workforce participation rate (WPR) (percentage of main and marginal workers to the total population) is 34.18 percent (including 1.35 percent marginal workers). Madurai urban WPR in 1991 was 31.87 percent (including 0.64 percent marginal workers). The positive growth in WPR in urban area, by more than 3 percent over the last decade, can be attributed to the growth in the Service Sector. In the absence of a detailed breakdown of sector/category wise workers for 2001, the figures for 1991 are used to examine the composition of the workforce. Table 2.4 presents the category wise workforce composition in Madurai Corporation, according to Census1991. Table 2.3.1: Socio Economic Characteristics of Madurai City No Year 1991 2001 Population 940,988 928,869 Primary Sector 1 Cultivators & Agricultural Laborers 7,069 3,35 2 Livestock & Mining 1,489 Sub Total Primary 8,558 Secondary Sector 3 Household & Industry 24,795 9,623 4 Construction 16,662 Sub Total Secondary 41,457 Tertiary Sector 5 Trade & Commerce 92,271 6 Transport & Communication 28,778 7 Other Services/ Other Main Workers 61,848 291,489 Sub Total Tertiary 182,897 291,489* 8 Marginal Workers 6,025 12,506 Total Workforce 299,941 317,453 9 Non Workers 641,048 611,416 10 Work Force Participation Rate 31.87% 34.18% Source: Census Reports Note: * Includes the figures of Livestock & Mining, HH & Industry and the tertiary sector. 2.3.2 Industrial Development The town has always been weak in industrial base although, historically it has been an important trading center for handloom, silk weaving, Pottery, Leather Industry, etc., the significance of which (trade and commerce) reduced over a period of time. Lack of entrepreneurship and limited resources are the main reasons for non development of industries in this district. However, the town maintains its significance as a major tourism destination in India. The three major industrial estates in the district are K. Pudur Industrial Estate, Automobile Co operative Industrial estate at Kappalur and Industrial Estate at Urranganpatti for Hosiery products (refer Table 2.3.2). Apart from the above, a functional Electrical and Electronic Industrial estate has been established at
43 Kappalur. All major estates are located along the periphery of the Municipal Corporation, and serve the town in terms of employment opportunity. There are some Small Scale Industries located within the City. Table 2.3.2: Industrial Estates operating in Madurai District Industrial Estates Area (Hect.) Work Sheds (Nos.) K. Pudur Estate 50.054 74 Kappalaur Estate 136 148 Urranganpatti Estate 69 147 Presently, the economy is solely dependent on tourism business and competition from other towns and other states has altered the potentials of the town leading to reduced growth rates and as well reduced the inflow of floating population. The total floating population of Madurai is estimated at 2,10,000 visitors per day. The inflow of foreign tourists is more during the period from November to March, while the influx of domestic visitors stretches from April to June. Tourism related activities strive in the City, since Madurai serves as a transit place for religious tours to southern towns like Tiruchendur, Rameswaram, Kanyakumari and other places in southern Kerala. However, the region of Madurai is attracting large investments in textiles and associated industries. It has been noted that three integrated textile parks are coming up in the region which would boost the economy, particularly the export economy having significant economic opportunities in the region. 2.3.3 Employment Major employment in the City is provided by Tertiary Sector, mainly being Tourism Industry and related ancillary activities. Approximately 92 percent of the workforce is employed in Tertiary Sector. Property Assessment details, for 2004 05, indicates that there are approximately 155 lodges in the City and a number of other hotels and restaurants, thus being a major provider of employment in the city. 2.4 Land and Housing Madurai city is facing acute shortage of housing stock, mainly attributed to the phenomenal growth of the city with influx of rural population, increase in tourism related activities and conversion of building use. There is a need to add 60,000 houses in the next 10 years to meet the demand. The growth in houses and households is presented in Table 2.4.1. Table 2.4.1: Growth in Houses and Households. Year Population Census Households No. of Average (Nos.) Houses Households Household (Nos.) / House size 1961 424,810 50,243 87,904 1.75 4.84 1971 549,114 76,319 125,706 1.64 4.37 1981 820,891 157,888 159,154 1.01 5.16 1991 940,989 198,612 2001 928,869 194,552 215,265 1.10 4.32
44 Source: Census of India, 2001 In an effort to overcome housing shortage Tamil Nadu Housing Board (TNHB) is exploring option for developing housing schemes at various locations and along the ring road. TNHB has developed neighborhood schemes, which consist of Anna Nagar, K.K.Nagar as well as in Satyamangalam and Tallakulam areas. The economically weaker sections have been allotted with more number of plots. In Melavasal area, about 450 tenements were constructed for housing the slum people. Schemes are in progress in Thatheneri and other north neighborhood areas. 2.5 Social Capital Markets: The central wholesale vegetable and flower market is located in CBD area near the Temple. The central market covers approximately 4 acres area and accommodates nearly 400 wholesale shops and 1000 retailer shops selling vegetables, fruits, flowers and food grains. The market is located in two plots on either sides of the North Avani Moola veedi near the temple. The land use around the market is mostly residential and partly institutional, although increasing conversion to mixed landuse is noticed. Apart from these, there are number of daily markets located within the City including weekly and Sunday markets, slaughterhouse etc. Some of the major issues noticed here are narrow streets, and proximity to the temple which often causes traffic congestion and pollution. Other Assets: The Corporation maintains two slaughter houses; however, there is no system for solid waste management and effluent treatment in this slaughterhouse. In addition to this, there are number of unorganized shops where slaughtering takes place thus resulting in unhealthy and unhygienic practices. Besides, there is a severe a lack of infrastructure facilities in these areas. 2.6 Health The basic health indicators of the city are given in the Table 2.8 below. Birth and Death Statistics for Madurai are comparatively better as compared to the region, given the presence of good medical institutions in the City. As per Birth Death registered maintained by the Corporation, the City registered 19,199 births and 3,191 deaths in 2004. Table 2.8: Basic Health Indicators, 2004 Vital statistics Details Birth Rate 19.3 Death Rate 3.2 Still Birth Rate 5.00 Infant Morality Rate 8.90 Maternal Morality Rate 0.64 The ULB is maintaining 17 Urban Health Posts, 16 Maternity Centers (of below 25 beds) and two Siddha Dispensaries. The facilities are poorly maintained and need strengthening and upgradation.
45 2.7 Education Madurai City houses government education institutions along with aided and private institutions. The City is base to Madurai Kamaraja University. Prominent institutions include Theyagaraja Engineering College and the Medical College. Madurai City has a literacy rate of 78.62 percent, which is marginally high in comparison to the district figure. The literacy rate has improved over the last decade, in lieu of the City’s growing significance in the region and presence of Government and Private Educational Institutions. 2.8 City Management & Urban Governance Institutional Arrangements: The State Government’s line departments continue to play a crucial role in urban basic service delivery. Sectors and agency involvement include: Water Supply & Sewerage: The Tamil Nadu Water Supply and Drainage Board (TWAD) is responsible for creation of water and sewerage infrastructure in the state. However, Madurai Municipal Corporation is responsible for the provision and delivery of services within the City. Master Plan: The Town and Country Planning Department (TCPD) prepares the Master Plan and Comprehensive Development Plan (CDP) for the city/town, and the mandate of implementing the Master Plan /CDP lies with the ULB – growth is generally haphazard and unplanned, the CDP is rarely referred to. However, with a vision to achieve planned growth, revision of CDP is in progress. Roads and Highways: Highways and Rural Works maintain the National and State Highways that pass through the town/city. Municipal roads are however created and maintained by the ULB. Environmental Protection: The Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board (TNPCB) is responsible for environmental protection and enforcement of rulings related to the same, passed by competent authorities. Slum Up gradation: The Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board (TNSCB) develops improvement schemes for notified/regularized slum settlements in the city/town. Infrastructure provision is financed partly through loans from the Housing and Development Corporation (HUDCO) and partly through grants from GoTN and GoI. In addition to involvement of various institutions in the development of local level infrastructure, the Municipal Administration & Water Supply Department controls local level governance through the Commissionerate of Municipal Administration (CMA). Multiple Agencies such as State Highways, National Highways, P.W.D., Slum Clearance Board, and Tamil Nadu Housing Board are working for the provision of basic services and infrastructure in the Madurai Corporation area, with their
46 own budget allotments from the State Government. If there are deficiencies in their service sector the respective Agencies are responsible. As far as Basic Services such as WS & Drainage concerned TWAD or CMWSS Board are executing agencies and if there is any deficiencies in these services, responsibility lies with MMC only. Table 2.8.1: Institutional Responsibility – Madurai City Areas Planning and Construction Operation and Design Maintenance Water Supply Madurai Madurai Madurai Corporation Corporation Corporation Sewerage Madurai Madurai Madurai Corporation Corporation Corporation Drainage Madurai Madurai Madurai Corporation Corporation Corporation Storm Water Madurai Madurai Madurai Corporation Drainage Corporation Corporation Solid Waste Madurai Madurai Madurai Corporation Disposal Corporation Corporation Corporation Roads Madurai Madurai Madurai Corporation (Including flyovers) Corporation Corporation Street Lighting Madurai Madurai Madurai Corporation Corporation Corporation Slums Madurai Madurai Madurai Corporation Corporation Corporation As envisaged in the 74th Amendment Act, the Elected Council of the local body is vested with the power of planning and approving the infrastructure facilities. The operation and maintenance is the responsibility of the local body. The deficiency in infrastructure facilities is due to the need of capital investment and not attributed to institutional arrangements. Table 2.8.2: Institutional Responsibility – Madurai Local Planning Area (Excluding Madurai Corporation Limits) Areas Planning Constructio Operation and and Design n Maintenance Water Supply TWAD TWAD ULB Sewerage TWAD TWAD ULB Drainage ULB ULB ULB Storm Water Drainage ULB ULB ULB Solid Waste Disposal ULB ULB ULB Corporation Roads (Including ULB ULB ULB flyovers) Street Lighting ULB ULB ULB Slums ULB ULB ULB Here there is no overlapping on the part of the local bodies and other institutions. The elected council of the local body is also responsible and administrative authority to implement the projects required for that town. Here also, the capital investment requirement is the main problem for the deficiency and not overlapping is responsible for the deficiency in infrastructure facilities.
47 Role of Private Sector in Urban Infrastructure Provision Urban Infrastructure Role of Private Sector Water Supply Water treatment and pumping are proposed to let out to private sector. Sewerage and All activities after the initial O&M by CMWSSB, it is decided drainage to hand over to private sector. Storm Water Drainage Solid Waste Disposal Out of 4 zones, 1 zone was privatized from collection disposal arrangements. It is expected, all the zones are to be privatized shortly. Corporation Roads One major by pass road is proposed to be constructed under (Including flyovers) BOT basis. Street Lighting It is proposed to provide O&M to private sector. Policy framework: The Madurai Municipal Corporation Act (1971) governs the management of the City Corporation and the Tamil Nadu District Municipalities Act (1920) govern the management of Municipality and Town Panchayat of the State. Amendment to the Corporation Act (1971) and Amendment to the Municipalities Act (1920), provides impetus for environment improvement through Rain Water Harvesting. Service Delivery and Performance of ULB The Madurai Municipal Corporations Act, 1971, governs the management of the City Corporation. The Corporation is responsible for provision of services and basic amenity to the citizens, which include: Distribution of potable water; Operation and maintenance of drainage and sewerage systems; Public lighting; Sanitation and public hygiene; Construction and maintenance of bus terminals, roads, culverts, and bridges; Maintenance of public parks and gardens; Ensuring systematic urban growth; Regulation of building construction; and Licensing of commercial activities, etc. Organization Structure of Urban Local Body The structure of the Corporation consists of two Wings i.e., the Deliberative Wing and the Executive Wing. Executive Wing: The Executive wing is responsible for the day to day functioning of the corporation and assists the deliberative wing in the decision making process. The Municipal Commissioner heads the executive wing of the ULB, and various officers in charge of different departments or sections assist the Commissioner in managing the ULB. The personnel include Managers, Account officer, Health officers, Revenue officer and City engineer. These officers are assisted in their work by junior officials.
48 Apart from its own employees, the ULB also employs daily wage basis workers or contractual workers for services such as street lighting, and sanitation and water supply. These include electricians, watchmen, water boys, drivers, valve operators etc. Certain jobs like sanitary works and garbage clearance are done through contracts where the usual procedure followed is selection through tenders. Administrative Wing: Madurai Corporation's deliberative wing consists of a Council, with mayor and all councilors as members, and 6 Standing Committees. The council is elected for 5 years. Each Standing Committee has one Chairman and 5 members. The members of the Committee are elected by the council. The Chairman of each committee is elected by the members of that committee and he holds the post for period of one year. Presently, the Corporation wards are divided into 4 zones namely North, South, East, and West. Ward committees of each zone are headed by a Ward Committee Chairman. Apart from this there are 6 standing committees, tax appeal committee, appointment committee and disciplinary action committee. Tax Appeal committee constitutes of two councilors (elected by the Council as members), to disposes the tax appeals preferred by the tax payers. According to the rules framed under the Corporation Act and the subsequent amendments, the Standing Committees discuss and decide on matters relating to: Public Health, Education and Social Justice; Town Planning and City Improvement; and Accounts. Various departments under the ULB share the responsibility of service delivery within the Corporation. The functions of various officials/departments, under the Administrative wing, are elucidated hereunder: Commissioner: The Commissioner is at the apex of this structure and is responsible for all activities carried out by the ULB. The Commissioner is responsible for preparation and certification of all periodical records, returns and furnishes all information as may from time to time be required by the Municipal Council or the Standing committees. He is also responsible for preparation of accounts. At each general meeting, the Commissioner along with some other key officials, discuss various issues with the elected representatives. General Administration Department: The department is headed by the Commissioner and assisted by Assistant Commissioner (Personnel), Administrative officers, Public relation officer, Superintendent and other officers. This department is responsible for establishment, other essential matters relating to office, officers, staff and their welfare like preparation of staff pay bills, maintenance of registers for advances, GPF, pension, PF’s etc. Engineering and Water Supply Department: City Engineer heads the Engineering Section and is assisted by executive engineers, assistant executive engineers, assistant engineers, junior engineers and other staff. This department looks after
49 all the works relating to execution and maintenance of basic amenities like Water Supply, Drainage, Sewerage, Storm water drains, Roads, Street lights, etc. The Engineering department is also responsible for ensuring the quality of works and their execution within the time frame. Revenue and Accounts Department: The department is headed by the Commissioner and assisted by Deputy Commissioner, Assistant Commissioners (Accounts and Revenue), Accounts officers, Revenue Officers, Assistant officers and other officers. The Accounts Section is responsible for supervising all financial transactions related to the CMC, advising the Commissioner on all internal financial matters, updating financial receipts and expenditure details in accordance with the utilization of funds, reporting deviations in expenditure of funds in any of the allocated schemes, assisting preparation of the CMC budget, maintenance of accounts regarding stamp duty, SFC Grants, MP Grants, maintenance of petty cash book and general cash book and attending to audit requirements and other such accounts related duties. Revenue Officer, heading the Revenue Section, is responsible for collecting taxes such as, trade tax, house tax, advertisement tax, and entertainment tax; development charges; transfer of properties (commonly called Khatha transfer); collection of duty; issuing notices for recovery of tax; and monitoring revenue collections of the ULB. Public Health Department: The department is headed by City Health Officer, and is responsible for ULB services such as Solid waste management, public health related works like malaria control, family planning, mother and child health care, birth and death registration etc, and other government assisted programs related to health and poverty reduction and awareness programs. The City Health Officer assisted by the Health Inspectors and Sanitary Inspectors, is responsible for services of Solid waste management and Malaria Control activities. Junior officers are in charge of works execution at the field level, which includes monitoring and supervising the work of sanitary laborers in the wards under their charge and attending to specific local complaints. Besides, this department is responsible for the enforcement of the Public Health Act. The City Health Officer is assisted by the assistant health officer, assistant nurses, biologist and drivers etc. The department is also involved in promotion of health awareness programs and implements various State and Central assisted schemes like pulse polio project, SJSRY etc. Town Planning Department: A chief town planning officer heads this department, assisted by assistant town planning officers, building inspectors, surveyors and junior assistants and other staff. The major function of this department is issue of building license, preparation and implementation of development plans and eviction of encroachments, urban planning and building regulation. The corporation maintains a Treasury Office, which is responsible for Pre Audit of the work bills and pay bills, before sending them for auditing to the Directorate of Local fund Accounts as done in the Government treasury offices. Other wings, which are functioning in the corporation, are Council wing, Legal wing, Vigilance wing and Public relation wing.
50 3 URBAN PLANNING AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT
3.1. Overview Government of Tamil Nadu has notified Local Planning Area for Madurai, extending over an area of 720.97 Sq.Km under Town and Country Planning Act, 1971. Conurbation area of LPA includes Madurai Corporation, four municipalities (Thirumangalam, Thiruparamkundram, Avaniapuram and Anayyur), five town Panchayats and 179 Villages. Urban settlements, 10 settlements as indicated above, in LPA cover an area of approximately 143.74 Sq.Km, as per CDP for Madurai for 2001. Madurai Corporation covers approximately 36 percent of the Urban Area in LPA. A rural settlement, 179 revenue villages covers an area of approximately 577.23 Sq.Km. 3.2. Master Plan Implementation and Implications
First Master Plan for Madurai City was prepared by TCP authority, and received the final approval in 1994. Given the trends in development and spatial growth, a revised City Development Plan for Madurai City, for 2021, is under preparation by TCP. The Plan is approved and is awaiting publication. Review of Madurai Master Plan, 2001
The master plan prepared for Madurai LPA estimated a population of approximately 22 lakh of which, 16 lakh is indicated for within Madurai ULB limits. The master plan proposed to accommodate Thrirupparankundram, Avaniyapuram, Palkalainagar, Paravai and Othakadai as urban nodes and Vadipatty Sholavandan, Alanganallur, Thirumangalam and Thiruppuvanam as satellite towns. Existing Land Use Pattern, 2001 The Plan emphasized on regional development strategy, for the LPA, by Circulation expanding the economic base and 18% industrial base, and by addressing constraints for physical growth. The Plan Public & Semi public proposed to accommodate a population 10% Residential 48% of approximately 16 lakh within Madurai and develop satellite towns each Educational accommodating approximately 0.75 lakh 8%
diverted population in addition to their Industrial population. It is proposed to link the 7% Commercial satellite towns by Rapid Transit System. 9% Residential Commercial Industrial The Plan estimated approximately 90 sq. Educational Recreational Public & Semi- public km developed area, within LPA, for 2001. Circulation Planned efforts at sector level are regulated by Town Planning Schemes. In
51 Madurai there are 31 Town Planning (TP) schemes, 3 number of draft schemes. The total number of approved DDP’s are 46 and 14 number of schemes consented by the government/ DTCP. 3.3. Existing Land Use
Review of the land use pattern of Madurai City, for 2001, indicates that approximately 88 percent of land is being put to developed use as against 72 percent in 1994. Presently, approximately 48 percent of developed area is put to residential use, 18 percent area under transportation and 9 percent area under commercial Use. Area under commercial & education use has increased by more than 200 percent each, which is not adequately supported by allocation of area for circulation and transportation. There is marginal increase in area under residential use, thus increasing the residential density of the existing areas. Land use pattern for Madurai City as existed in 1984 and in 2001 is as follows in the Table 3.3.1. Table 3.3.1: Existing Land use Pattern, 2001 Land use Type Area % to Area % to (1994) Developed (2001) Sq. Developed Sq. km area km area Residential 21.45 57.49 21.79 47.77 Commercial 1.94 5.32 4.14 9.07 Industrial 2.10 5.63 3.12 6.84 Education 1.72 4.61 3.62 7.93 Public & Semi public 2.65 7.10 4.66 10.23 Transportation/ Circulation 7.41 19.85 8.29 18.18 Sub Total (Developed 37.32 100.00 45.61 100.00 Area) Water Bodies 5.03 2.07 Agriculture 9.48 4.14 Sub Total (un Developed 14.06 6.21 Area) Total 51.82 51.96 Source: Master Plan for Madurai, 2001 & Revised CDP for Madurai, 2021. Proposed Land Use Pattern, 2021
Proposed Land Use Pattern: The Local Circulation Planning Authority has proposed Revised 17% City Development Plan for Madurai City for Public & Semi 2021. Proposed land use is elaborated public below in Table 3.3.2 9% Residential 51% Review of the proposed land use pattern Educational 7% of Madurai City, for 2021, indicates that Industrial approximately 95 percent of land is being 6% put to developed use as against 88 Commercial percent presently. Approximately 51 10% Residential Commercial Industrial percent of developed area is proposed to Educational Recreational Public & Semi- public Circulation be put to Residential use, served by 17 percent area under Circulation and 10 percent area under Commercial Use.
52 Approximately 300 Ha of additional area is proposed for residential use over 20 years, as compared to present area. This area is minimal as compared to the demand, due to population growth, and shall result in further densification of the existing wards. Also, there is no increase in area proposed for transportation or circulation use, which is likely to cause bottlenecks for development of infrastructure over the Plan period. There are approximately 21 major water bodies (2.07 sq.km), maintained by the Public Works Department (PWD) and have been retained over the Plan period. Table 3.3.2: Proposed Land use Pattern, 2021
Land use Type Area (2021) Sq. km % to Developed area Residential 24.75 50.36 Commercial 4.70 9.57 Industrial 3.12 6.35 Education 3.62 7.36 Public & Semi public 4.66 9.49 Transportation/ Circulation 8.29 16.86 Sub Total (Developed Area) 49.14 100.00 Water Bodies 2.07 Agriculture 0.61 Sub Total (un Developed Area) 2.68 Total 51.96 Source: Revised CDP for Madurai, 2021. 3.4. Development Patterns – Growth Areas and Direction Historically, development of the City was noticed around the temple, which is the focal point in the southern part of river Vaigai, followed by growth in urban area surrounding the Old City. Later, developments came up in the northern side of the river which has gained prominence over the last two decades with the establishment of government offices and institutional buildings. As in case of most of the cities, Madurai’s growth pattern is also guided along the major transportation corridors, 2 National Highways and 7 Major District Roads. Trend of spatial growth within LPA is noticed along NH 7 (towards Thirunelveli and towards Dindigul) and towards Airport, in the South and towards Alagarkoil, Mellur and Natham in the North. Towards the South of Madurai Corporation, a notable increase in population growth is observed in Thirumangalam Town and Thirupparankundaram Town, along NH 7, and in Avaniyapuram Town along Airport Road, in the past few years. Low denisty growth is also noticed along NH 7, towards Rameswaram. In the Northern side, population increase is noticed, in and around Anayyur Town and along Alagarkoil Road. In keeping with the growth pattern, the government has identified and upgraded three Town Panchayat’s (Thiruppurankundaram, Avaniyapuram and Anayyur) into Municipality in 2005. Figure to right, indicates the growth direction of Madurai City and the locations of recently upgraded municipalities. Growth Trend towards North: Major development activities are noticed towards the Northern side within Corporation limits, along Alagarkoil Road and Puddur/
53 Mellur Road, attributed to the development of High Court and Major Bus Stand (Mattuthavani Bus Stand). New and Upmarket residential development is noticed along Mellur Road and along Natham Road. In the southern side, low intensity development is noticed along Theni Road, and areas beyond the By Pass Road, and also along road to Theyagaraja Enggineering College. Newly developing commercial area are noticed, in North Central Areas, along the Alagarkoil Road Main road. Growth Trend towards South: The newly developed neighborhoods, such as Alagappan Nagar, Shenoy Nagar, West Ponnagaram extension, TVS Nagar, Anna Nagar and KK nagar, are well planned with open spaces and low density. The commercial hub of the City and the region is the Core City, with high density of shopping and commercial establishments. High Density Low Income Areas: Major low income areas include Sellur, Thatheneri in North Zone, Ares along the Bank of Vaigai in the North and South Zone, and Fringe Areas near to Avaniyapuram and Villupuram in the South. 3.5. Growth Constraints and Developmental Potentials Constraints: Major constraint for growth in Madurai, is the limited area available for development and the high population density (56 wards of a total of 72 wards have density above 200 Persons per Ha), within the corporation limits thus making it saturated. This has put excess pressure on the infrastructure services and deteriorated the quality of life in the recent years. Very high residential density pattern is observed in the Core City area (more than 1000 Persons per Hectare). Although, the actual density in this area is far higher than the indicated figures, given the presence of floating population and the commercial establishments located in and around the Core City area. Major constraint noticed here is rapid conversion to mixed landuse and lack of open spaces, which is again deteriorating the quality of life, coupled with traffic congestion. Also, Central Market, the wholesale market for vegetable and flowers spread over 2.06 ha, and its associated activities adds to the congestion in CBD area. One of the major deviations with respect the Master Plan, 1994, is the growth of the City towards Northern region, along Mellur Road and Alagarkoil Road, at a faster pace as compared to the Southern Region, along the Thirunelveli Road and Airport Road. Investigation have revealed that major constraint to growth in the south is Poor quality and Inadequate availability of ground water in the Southern region along the Airport Road. Also the growth is facilitated by presence of institutional, government (High Court) and service facilities (Mattuthavani Bus Stand) towards the North. Development Potentials: Growth potential needs to be explored at regional level, within the LPA. The very high population density within the ULB limits is resulting in high real estate prices and increased pressure on urban services. There is a need to capitalize on the growth potentials nodes in the LPA, through transportation linkages and special development areas, to increase the spatial growth potential of the ULB. As propagated in the Master Plan, 1994, there is
54 need to identify and develop newly developed Urban Nodes. The regional development Potentials of the region is linked to its economic and industrial base, hence a comprehensive program to review and revamp sick industries in the region. This in turn will induce development potentials in the region. 3.6. Key Developmental Issues Madurai Corporation encompasses only 36 percent of the LPA’s urban area although it houses approximately 80 percent of the urban population of LPA, thus indicating a need for delimitation of the ULB area. Very high population density pattern noticed inside the Corporation limits is deteriorating the quality of life. This has resulted in high real estate prices within the Corporation area, thus channelizing development towards the adjacent Local Bodies and areas beyond Corporation limits. A review of the Revised Master Plan, 2021, has indicated that the proposed area for the future development is grossly inadequate given the population growth trend. Future increase in area for residential use is not supported with increase in area for traffic and transport use, which will create bottleneck for future development. In addition, no increase is noticed in area for recreational use, which shall impact the quality of life over the Plan period. Currently, increased demand for urban services is proving as bottleneck for present development of the City. Heavy vehicular congestion is noticed in the Old City Area where Meenakshi Amman Temple is located, attributed to the slow moving vehicles, presence of high floating population and commercial establishments, which is fast deteriorating the quality of life. In the newly developing housing layouts, the OSR’s have not been handed over to the Madurai Corporation under the Act, resulting in non provision of civic services in these layouts.
55 4 INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES 4.1 Water Supply Existing Situation Source: Madurai Corporation meets its water demand through Surface and Sub Surface Sources, through water supply schemes, on Vaigai River. First protected water supply was provided to Madurai City in the year 1892, through headworks at Arapalayam. Subequently, considering the increasing population and additional demand, headworks was installed, early in the 1970’s, at Thatchampattu, Melakkal, Kochadai and Collector Well on the Vaigai Riverbed are being utilized to convey water through Pumping, to the North Zone during monsoon season and whien there is sufficient flow in the river. Headworks at Manaloor and Thiruppavanam, dowstream of Madurai city, were originally designed to pump water into the South Zone, and are partly functional depending on the availability at Source. Pursuant to the design and implementation of the World Bank funded Vaigai Water Supply Scheme, potable water is now being supplied to the South Zone areas through transmission system coveying 68 MLD, from Vaigai Reservoir. Present Water Supply System. Avaialble sources of water supply to the ULB and their present supply are listed below: Original Scheme I (Present Yield 16 MLD). A partial yield from September to February through existing collector well/Infiltration galleries installed on Vaigai River at Melakkal, Thatchampattu, Kochadai and Collector Well for supply to the North Zone. Design Capacity of the aforementioned headworks is 52 MLD. However, only 16 MLD of water is realized from the riverbed, 14 MLD from Melakkal headwork and 2 MLD from the renovated Thatchampattu headwork, and this amount is highly dependent on river wetting, through release of water from Vaigai Reservoir. Original Scheme II (Present Yield – 2 MLd). A partial yield (monsoon season) is achieved from headworks installed at Manaloor and Thirupavanam on the Vaigai Riverbed. Design Capacity of the headworks is 7 MLD. Vaigai Water Supply Scheme (Present Yield 68 MLD). Year round available source conveyed, through clear water mains from Vaigai Reservoir under the World Bank project implemented in the year 1993. Design Capacity of the Scheme is 68 MLD. Treatment: The facility is located at Pannaipatty village, 16.6 km from Vaigai Dam, and serves Vaigai Water Supply Scheme. The Plan has a design capacity of 71.6 MLD, of which only 68 MLD is being utilised. Raw Water from Vaigai Dam is conveyed by gravity through 1100 mm PSC transmission main (16.60 kms length) to the treatment work. Transmission: Clear water is transmitted by gravity from WTP to Arasaradi
56 Pumping Station, to be distributed in the ULB through service reservoirs. Clear Water is transmitted to Main Pumping Station, via 48.80 kms long 1100 mm dia. PSC mains. Main Pumping Station: Arasaradi Main Pumping and Booster Station lcoated 2 km from the City, was initailly constructed in 1963 under the Original Scheme and Upgraded in 1993 under the Vaigai Scheme to Augment Capacity. The Facility is installed with one GLSR (6.8 ML) and Balancing OHT (1.15 ML). The MPS cum Booster Station is installed with a total pumping Capacity of 540 HP, with equal Stand by Capacity. Diversion of Water to North Bank in Summer Season is managed from this facility. Water is pumped to Elevated Service reservoirs in North Zone from Arasaradi MPS, while it is conveyed directly from Clear Water Main to Service Reservoirs in South Zone. Service Reservoir: The town is served with 23 OHT’s and One GLSR, with a design capacity of 34.85 ML and 6.8 ML respectively. 10 OHT’s serving North Zone and 13OHT’s serving South Zone. Table 4.1.1 indicates the Storage Capacity of the ULB. Table 4.1.1: Service Reservoirs and Distribution Zone Reservoirs Nos Capacity Nos. Lakh Litres Ground Level Service Reservoir North of Vaigai River South of Vaigai River 1 68.00 Over Head Tank North of Vaigai River 10 112.00 South of Vaigai River 13 236.50 Total GLSR 1 68.00 Total OHT 23 348.50 Distribution System: Feeder Mains laid from headworks or Main Pumping Stations, conveys water to the service reservoirs. For North Zone, two major Feeder Main lines conveys water, from Arasaradi Pumping Station to 10 Service Reservoirs, and for South Zone, two major Feeder Main lines and Branch Feeder Mains convey water to the 13 Service Reservoirs. The ULB is divided into 12 Water Supply Distribution Zones. A total length of approximately 467 kms of distribution system has been laid out of total road length of 615 kms. Distribution network within the ULB covers all wards, except the fringe areas, some extension areas and low income areas. Pipelines in the existing distribution network vary between 90 and 350 mm diameter and pipe materials used are AC, CI and PVC. Frequency of water supply in the ULB is once in 2 days. In addition to this, approximately 0.36 MLD is supplied to uncovred areas by Tanker Supply, through 10 tankers (capacity – 9,000 litres each). The tankers maintain a trip rate of approximately 2 to 3 trips per day. Presently, water is supplied to approximtely 10.48 lakh population at 67 lpcd. Service Connections. The municipality has provided 82,369 water supply connections, of which 79,611 are Domestic connections (96.65percent), 2,586are Commercial connections (3.14 percent) and 172 are Industrial connections
57 (0.21percent). Water Tariff: The present tariff structure (Flat Rate) is Rs. 412 per year for Residential and Rs. 991 per year for Commercial and Institutional and Rs. 1,466 per year for Industrial connections. Flat rate system is followed for all types of connections irrespective of metered provisions, since most of meters are not in function. Deposit and connection charges are indicated below in table. Table 4.1.2: Water Tariff Deposit Details Type of Deposit Connection Flat Connections Amount (Rs.) Charges (Rs.) Rate/Month (Rs.) Residential 1,000.00 1,500.00 42.85 Commercial 2,000.00 2,000.00 85.00 Industrial 4,000.00 2,500.00 150.00 Institutional 2,000.00 2,000.00 85.00
Other Sources of Supply: Other sources include ground water, which is non potable in nature in Madurai City. The ULB indicates that ground water is extracted from approximately 1,365 borewells. Unserved areas/Extension areas of the ULB is supplied water through water tankers (Approximate Supply – 0.50 MLD).
Service Adequacy and Key Issues. Key issues/indicators are based on review and discussions and data analysis presented in Table 4.1.3 below.
Table 4.1.3: Water Supply Indicators Units Service Norms Indicator Status
Population covered Percent 100 100 Households Covered Percent 52 90 Per Capita Supply Lpcd 67 110 Treatment Capacity (% of Supply) Percent 78 100 Storage Capacity (% to Supply) Percent 50 33 Distribution Network Reach (% of Road Percent 84 > 100 Length) Houses/PT Assessments with Water Percent 62 85 Connection Slum Population Per Public Stand Persons 67 150 Post Once in 2 Frequency of Supply Daily days Low Supply Levels. Low per Capita supply is noticed; the situation becomes worse in Summer Season with Per Capita Supply coming to as low as 60 lpcd. The frequency of supply in the City is once in two days in Normal Season. Inadequate Treatment Capacity. In respect of increasing demand in the future,
58 the treatment capacity needs augmentation. Present Capacity is lower than adequate. Inadequate Service Coverage. 100 percent of the population is served with protected water supply system with lesser pro rata supply. Also only 52 percent of the households is provided with House Service Connections. Besides, demand for water supply has not taken into account the requirements of water supply to the peripheral areas forming part of ‘Greater Madurai’. Inadequate Network Coverage. Distribution network runs approximately 80 percent of the Road Length. Considering the high population density within the ULB, the network adequacy demand, as a percent of road length, is high. Inadequate Summer Storage. The pattern of rainfall is erratic. There is no scope for storing rainwater for recharging, as most of the water bodies are encroached, silted and used as sewerage outlets. Need for Source Augmentation. The present source of water is not adequate to meet out the requirements of the people, and augmentation is required to meet future requirements. Refurbishment of the Existing System in the Core Areas. The distribution system in the Core Areas has been laid before 50 years. Although intermittent rehabilitation works have been carried, based on complaints, the system needs a comprehensive rehabilitation measure based on Detail Study. Need for Asset Management Action Plan. It is required to maintain an O & M Schedule, for Water Supply Assets, for regular maintenance and energy consumption optimization. A leak detection study conducted by WAPCOS/NEERI in 1998 is undertaken in West Zone by TWAD Board, which reveals a 30 % losses in distribution network and transmission main and remedial measures are being taken. As already 84 % of water supply coverage is in existence, 100 % coverage will be attained in the 2 1/2 years. 4.2 Sewerage and Sanitation Existing Situation Under Ground Drainage System: Madurai Corporation is bifurcated into two drainage zones namely North Zone and South Zone.. The sewerage system for Madurai City, especially in the Core Area, is one of the earliest system constructed in India and commissioned in 1925. The system has been expaned ever since, depending on the population cover and the fund availability. Presently, under the National River Conservation Program, the Corporation is aiming to achieve universal coverage. The UGD scheme for unsewered areas of the Corporation, is under implementation. Presently, Phase I of the scheme is completed and commissioned. After the implementation of Phase I of UGD Project, 43 wards are fully sewered, 16 wards are partially sewered while remaining 13 are unsewered, of the total of 72 wards in the Corporation. Based on the ward coverage of the system and sewage generation, it is estimated that approximately 6.00 lakh population is presently being served with sewerage system. Table 4.2.1: Sewerage System Coverage
59 Status Ward Coverage under after Total Wards Implementation of NRCP Phase I (Nos) Fully Sewered 7 10,13 15,21,23,24, 28,31 54,56,58 63 43 Partially 1, 6, 11, 12,16, 17, 19, 20, 22, 25 27, 29, 16 Sewered 30, 55,57 Un sewered 2 5, 18, 64 – 72 13 Areas Source: TWAD Board. An overview of the Present System of Sewage Collection and Disposal in indicated below. Table 4.2.2: Sewerage System Overview Drainag Year of Drainage Pumping Sewag Sewage e Zone Commission Block (Nos.) Stations e Pumped ing (Year) (Nos.) Inflow to STP at MPS (MLD) (MLD) South 1924 1952 1 6 1 MPS @ of River 1959 1A & 7 Santhaipatt Vaigai 1965 8 i& 8 SPS 2001 8A 42.00 17.00 NRCP 2005 9, 9A, 10, Phase I 10A, SS 5 SPS Colony North of 1983 – 84 Munithirithope River Block 1 MPS @ Vaigai (including Munithirith Thathaneri ope & 2 Block) 19.00 10.00 SPS 1983 Anna Nagar 1983 KK Nagar NRCP 2005 NRV 1 SPS Phase I * Sewage from Block 1 and 1A are pumped directly to the Main Pumping Station, Source: TWAD Board. The sewerage system network runs approximately 375 kms including 48 kms of conveying mains (including 122 kms of laterals and 15 kms of Mains laid under NRCP Phase I), collecting a total sewage quantity of approximately 61 MLD at the main pumping stations. The raw sewage is partially pumped to the treatment plants (due to capacity constraint at STP) and treated (primary treatment), before being discharged into sewage farms. Pumping Stations. South Drainage Zone covers 15 blocks south of River Vaigai, and has approximately 42 MLD of waste reaching Main Pumping Station at Santhaipatty. Sewage is pumped to STP via 600 mm dia. CI pumping Main. However, due to capacity constraint at STP, only 17 MLD of sewage is pumped to STP and remaining 24 MLD is being disposed directly into the nearly channel without treatment. In the North Drainage Zone, covering 5 drainage blocks, 19 MLD received at Munthirithope Main Pumping Station is pumped to STP via 700
60 mm dia. CI pumping Main. However, only 10 MLD is pumped to the Sakkimangalam Treatment Plant, again due to capacity constraint at STP. 5 MLD of Sewage generated from KK Nagar Block and Anna Nagar Block is let out into Vandiyoor Channel and another 4 MLD of sewage is Over flowing at the Main Pumping Station into natural chanels. Sewage Inflow from NRCP Phase I Drainage Blocks are collected at the Main Pumping Stations of the respective zones, before being pumped to the respective STP’s. It is understood, that main reason for overload of sewage is design constraints as the capacities have not been augmented with coverage of the sewerage system. Treatment Facility. Treatment of sewage is carried out through Waste Stabilization method, at both treatment facilities. 17 MLD of sewage from South Drainage Zone is treated at Avanaipuram STP (design capacity – 13 MLD). Of the Two lagoons, used for collection of treated sewage, at Avaniapuram STP only one is operational. In North Zone, 10 MLD of sewage pumped from the Main Pumping Station to Sakkimanagalam STP (design capacity – 13 MLD). Of the total sewage generated, approximately 61 MLD, only 26 MLD of sewage is being treated because of severe capacity constraints at the STP’s.. Presently , both STP’s are in dilapidated condition and in need for urgent capacity augmentation and refurbishment. The capacity constraint has become more acute after commissioning of NRCP I. Waste is disposed to the sewage farms, adjacent to sewage treatment plants. Details of sewage farms are indicated below. Table 4.2.3: Sewage Farms Description Units Present Status Sewage Farms Avaniyapuram Sakkimangalam Area Available Acres 385 134.85 Cultivated Land Acres 217 15.50 Year of Commissioning 1924 1990 Guinea Gross Acres 185 Vegetation Acres 32 Capacity of Lagoons MLD 13.6 13.6 Lagoons Nos. 2 3 Size of Lagoons m 95 x 95 x 2.5 90 x 38.5 x 2.5 Approximate Annual Income Rs. Lakh 18.72 0.50 Effluent Disposal. Sewage from the Collection lagoon, in North Zone and South Zone, is discharged into agricultural fields or into water channels for irrigation. Sewer Connections. The Corporation has provided with 45,613 sewer connections. However, the sewage generation is very high as compared to the number of connections, thus indicating a gap in the System. This indicates the possibility for high numbers of illegal connections. Sanitation Facilities. Other Sanitaion facilities include Septic Tanks, Public Convenience Blocks (456 nos.), and Low Cost Sanitation Units (approximately 20,800 units). 87 Public convenience blocks are being maintained on ‘Pay and Use’ basis by private contractors. The ULB has also launched projects under ISP in the slum to benefit the urban poor, with assistance from the State Government. It is estimated that approximately 2.4 lakh population is covered by sanitation facilities, most of them being slum population.
61 Service Adequacy and Key Issues Key issues/indicators are based on review and discussions, and data analysis presented in Table 4.2.4 below. Table 4.2.4: Sewerage and Sanitation Indicators Indicator Units Service Norms Status (2004-05) Population Coverage Percent 59 90 Sewage Network reach (% Road length) Percent 32 100 Sewage Treated (% to sewage Percent 43 100 generated) % P.T. Assessment provided with Percent 35 Sewage connection Slum Population per seat of Public Nos. 210 - Convenience Source: Analysis Refurbishment of Old Sewer System. Original sewerage scheme in the Core City areas (Block 1 to 6), laid between 1925 and 1948, is functioning in a dilapidated condition. Based on a detailed assessment study, the parts of the scheme needs relaying and refurbishment. Inadequate Population Coverage. Only 59 per of the population is served with UGD system. Uncovered pockets/Illegal connections under UGD system result in disposing the sullage and night soil into roadside/storm water drains. Due to poor linkages in the storm water drains, the problem becomes more prominent during rainy season. Inadequate House Service Connections. Legal HSC’s constitute only 35 percent of PT assessment. Although based on actual Sewage generation, the number of connections is far higher, thus indicating presence of high numbers of illegal connections. In addition, the corporation is providing the UGD connections at a very slow pace although the system is partially in place. Treatment Capacity Constraint. Severe capacity constraint is noticed in the system with respect to treatment of sewage. Only 43 per of the sewage is being treated. The Problem shall become more acute after commissioning of NRCP Phase I and Phase II. Augmentation of Sewage Treatment Capacity, need to be taken up on priority basis due to acute capacity shortage currently. Augmentation issue needs to be addressed parallel to commissioning of NRCP Phases I and II. Inadequate and Ill Maintained Public Sanitation. There is a high dependency by slum population on public conveniences, the seat per person is limited and most slum dwellers resort to open defecation; public awareness regarding safe sanitation is very poor.
4.3 Storm Water Drainage and Rejuvenation of Water Bodies Existing Situation Storm Water Drains. Madurai is provided with network of storm water drains upto
62 a length of 170 kms, which is only 28 percent of the total road network of the City. The networks of drains are supported by 53 kms of primary drains or natural water channels. The Corporation maintains the strom water drains inside the Corporation Limits while the natural channels are maintained by the PWD. Table 4.3.1 provided further details regarding the storm water drains in the City. Table 4.3.1: Municipal Storm Water Drainage Drain type Length (km) Percent Open Drains (Pucca) 143.60 84.53 Open Drains (Kutcha) 4.25 2.50 Closed Drains (Pucca) 22.03 12.97 Total 169.88 100 Primary Drains/Natural Channels 53.00 Storm Water Drain Adequacy (% to road 27.60 length) Drainage System: Madurai City is situated on 9055’ north latitude and 7807’ east longitude. The City has grown on both sides of river Vaigai and its terrain is mostly flat. The ground rises from the center of the city, towards outward, on all sides except the south, which is generally sloping terrain. It is surrounded on the outskirts by small and prominent hills viz. Anaimalai, Nagamalai, Pasumalai and Sikandearmalai. The city is about 100 mts above mean sea level. Rainfall: On an Average, rainfall is irregular and intermittent, with an average of approximately 85 cm per annum. The region has received excessive rainfall in 2005. The region received maximum rainfall from Northeast Monsoon from October to December and Southwest Monsoon between July to August brings some rains. Primary Drain: Natural Water Channels (13 Nos.) running upto a length of 53 kms, serve as the Primary Drains and discharge surplus Storm Water in and around the City, into Vaigai River. The width of the Primary Drains varies within a range of 1.0 m to 3.5 m. Tertiary Drains:Corporation maintained Pucca Drains runs to approximately 22 kms (24 nos of Drains). The average width of these drains is approximately 0.60 m. The Corporation has provided one side as well as both sides drains along the roads in the Core City Area. Approximately 144 kms of open drains are provided in the City. Disposal: The Primary Drains discharge surplus storm water and sullage collected (all wards are not sewered, hence flow of sewage into storm water drains is also observed), into Vaigai River. It is estimated that approximately 3.65 MLD of sewage is letoff into River Vaigai through drains. Service Adequacy and Key Issues Key Issues/observation based on Indicators is elaborated below. Inadequate Coverage. Drains cover only 28 percent of the road length. Besides, Kutcha drains are not well defined and are easily damaged by the traffic, thus reducing the meaningful coverage of built up drains.
63 Out of 615 km of roads in Madurai Corporation limits, 60 km roads are less than of 3 m width, which are running mainly across the slums. The pre dominant surface type is stone paved, concrete in built with storm water drains. Though the existing storm water drain coverage is 28 % of the road network, every year 10 % of the roads will be provided with storm water drainage and 100 % will be attained within 7 years. Problem Areas. Perrier Bus Stand Area, Railway Colony, and Area near Under pass to Madurai Coats are some of the areas, which are frequently, flooded due to lack of proper drainage arrangements. Other flood prone areas include Simakkalam, area near Amritham Theatre, area near Tallakulam Perumal Kovil temple, Narimedu Kattabomman Nagar, and Menakkshipuram – Bibikulam area. Silting and Solid Waste Accumulation. Silting and uncontrolled solid waste dumping cause blockage and stagnate water channels/wastewater runoff. Consequently, drains choke and overflow into neighboring areas. Tanks around the city, which acted as flood moderators, have also witnessed Silting. Underutilized Water Bodies. Area under Water Bodies within the LPA, is not being put to productive use as Summer Storage Tanks. Presently, the tanks are in dilapidated condition and are only being used for recharge purpose. Misuse of Water Bodies is also noticed in terms of uncontrolled solid waste dumping. 4.4 Solid Waste Management Existing Situation The collection, transportation and disposal of municipal solid waste is an mandatory function of the Madurai Corporation. The municipal solid waste mainly comprises waste from households, markets, commercial establishments, hotels, hospitals and industries in the town. The Public Health department of the Corporation, headed by City Health Officer (CHO) and Assistant Heath Officer (AHO), is responsible for the Solid Waste Management in the City. For the efficient administration and for day to day operational purposes, the town is divided into 4 Zones covering all the 72 municipal wards. Waste Generation. The corporation generates approximatel y 450MT of solid waste per day, at the rate of approximtely 406 gms per capita, which on par of cities of similar size. High influx of floating population (approximately 2.10 lakh persons annually) is also sited as reason for high generation of solid waste, especially commercial waste. Sources of Waste Generation. The various sources of waste generation in Madurai are detailed out in the Table 4.4.1. Table 4.4.1: Sources of Solid Waste Generation Source Quantity (Tons/day) Composition (Percent) Domestic 288.00 64.00 Commercial 108.00 24.00 Industrial Hospitals and Clinics 18.00 4.00 Others 36.00 8.00
64 Source Quantity (Tons/day) Composition (Percent) Total 450.00 100.00 Domestic Waste: In Madurai, the major source of waste generation has been the households. The quantum of waste generated from households is around 288 tons per day, which is 64 percent of the total waste generation of the town. The household waste mainly consists of organic waste such as vegetable waste, food, etc.. Commercial Waste: Commercial establishments like Hotels, Restaurants, Shops, Trading units, small time Street Traders, Kalyan Mandapams, etc., generates solid waste which mainly comprises of paper, plastics, food left overs and other in organics. Madurai has approximately 25 Daily Markets and 2 Weekly Markets. The total quantum of waste generated from these sources is 108.00 tons per day, which constitutes about 24 percent of the total waste generated. Waste Collection in the market areas and the bus stand are managed by means of contract employees (70 contract workers). Industrial Waste: As there are no major industries in the Corporation Area, the waste from the existing units is not mixed with the municipal waste. Hospital and Clinical Waste. The urban local body is maintaining a few health post and maternity homes. In addition, Madurai consists of large private hospitals and health care institutions generating 18.00 tons of hospital waste. Hospital waste is collected and disposed seperately through incineration and is not mixed with municipal waste. Waste from Other Sources: The municipality also collects waste generated from street sweeping, drain desilting and construction. The quantity of solid waste generated from the above sources is of the order of 36 tons per day, which is about 8 percent of the total waste generation. Composition of Waste: In 2004, a study on the waste characterization of solid waste from ULB was conducted. Approximately 65.4 percent waste is Degradable, while the rest is Non Degradable (which mainly include Paper, Plastic, Glass, etc.). The details are presented in Table 4.4.2 & 4.4.3. Table 4.4.2: Waste Characterization Physical Components % by Weight Organic Waste Banana Leaves & Stem 0.35 Food & Vegetable Waste 53.37 Leaves and Branches & Wood 8.57 Coconut Husk 0.70 Fish Waste 1.32 Papers 1.33 Gunny Bags 0.12 Paddy Straw 1.47 Baggage 0.26 Cow Dung 0.90
65 Components % by Weight Sub-Total 68.42 Inorganic Waste Inorganic Silt 30.13 Plastic 0.75 Textile Waste 0.36 Rubbers 0.08 Metals 0.09 Glass 0.17 Total 31.58 Grand Total 100.00 Table 4.4.3: Waste Characterization Chemical Element Units Value Moisture Percent 50.70 Net V.S Percent 17.31 Ash Percent 30.70 Coal Percent 1.29 Sulphate mg per Kg 3,000 Phosphate mg per Kg 1,457 Chloride mg per Kg 1,499 N.P.K mg per Kg 1,105 Sodium mg per Kg 1,302 Pottasium mg per Kg 3,315 Calcium mg per Kg 5,600 Waste Collection. Presently, Collection of waste is managed by Municipal Sanitary Workers and Contractual Labourers. Waste Collection is some slums are being handled by Self Help Groups (SHG’s). Madurai Corporation manages to collect soild waste by employing 2079 sanitary workers. The workers collect the waste using Handcarts and Tricycles and disposes into dustbins and dumper bins for secondary collection. It is estimated that approximately 410 MT of waste is collected daily. Efforts in privatization of collection have been made through employing of contract workers and collection of waste from Bus Stand and other Commercial Areas. Privatization of Household waste collection is under active consideration by the Corporation, Presently, the Corporation has also engaged 70 contractual laborers for waste collection from markets and bus stand. The Corporation has appointed 12 SHG’s, comprising of 240 workers for primary collection operations. The Corporation has also engaged 200 contract workers for waste transportaiton. ULB manages primary collection through 135 Tricycles (Carrying Capacity 200 kgs/Tricycle) and 150 Hand Carts (Carrying Capacity – 100 kgs/Handcart). Collection and transfer of waste to collection points is managed by AutoMinidor (57 rented vehicles are being used by the ULB currently). There are 74 Dumper Bins with a total capacity of approximately 100 Tons placed at main collection locations around the City. Night sweeping is done effectively around the temple area, the core c, some markets and around bus stand.
66 Waste Transportation. In Madurai, as in most of the urban local bodies in the state, waste transportation is being carried out using open vehicles. Transfer of waste to collection points is done by ULB owned Hand Carts, Tricycles and Rented vehicles like Auto Minidors, which is further taken to dumping yard by means of ULB owned vehicles (Lorries and Dumper Placers) and Rented vehicles (Tractors). Transportation of waste is managed by 12 ULB owned vehicles and 65 hired vehicles. The ULB manages to collect and transport 410 MT of waste to the disposal site, based on varying number of trips assigned and undertaken by these vehicles. Table 4.4.4 indicates details of waste transportatation. Table 4.4.4: Vehicle Fleet and Transportation Capacity. Type of Municipal Total Trips/ Vehicle Carrying Vehicles Vehicles Day Capacity Capacity of Vehicles Nos. Nos. MT MT Municipal Vehicles Dumper 4 3 4.50 54.00 Placer Tipper Lorry 8 3 3.00 72.00 Sub Total 12 126.00 Contract Vehicles Tipper Lorry 8 3 3.00 72.00 Tractors 57 3 1.50 213.00 Sub Total 65 285.00 Total 128 411.00 Source: Analysis. Specialized Vehicles. Apart from the general fleet engaged for daily activities of transportation, the ULB own and operates specialized vehicles for specific purposes. The ULB has engaged 1 nos. Night Soild Lorry, 2 nos. Sewage Suction Lorry, 2 nos. Vacuum Sweeping Machines and 2 nos. other vehicles. The ULB operates these vehicles on intermitant basis, depending of the requirement. Privatization Efforts in Transportation. Municipality has privatised majority of the fleet for solid waste transportation bringing in savings in operations. Details of rentals are indicated in Table 4.4.5 below . Table 4.4.5: Rental Details of Hired Vehicles Type of Vehicles Rentals (Rs./Trip) Maximum Trips (Nos.) Lorry 396.00 3 Tractor 275.00 3 Auto Mini 95 5 Disposal. At present, the Corporation is not practicing any safe or scientific solid waste disposal methods. The waste collected from various localities in the city is directly disposed off by open dumping at Vellakkal site, located outisde the CC
67 limits. Solid waste generated from all sanitary wards is disposed off at this site. Site is located at about 10 km from the city and the total area of the site is 82 Acres. Institutional Set-Up As described earlier that municipal solid waste management is an obligatory function of the ULB. In Madurai, the Public Health department is headed by City Health Offier who is supported by four Circle Sanitary Officers.
Table 4.4.6: Staff Details of Health Department Description of Post Sanctioned Filled Post Vacant Post Post City Health Officer 1 1 0 Assistant Health Officer 1 1 0 Circle Sanitary Officer 4 Sanitary Inspector 84 37 47 Conservancy Inspectors 72 72 Drivers 91 65 26 Sanitary Supervisors 110 74 36 Sanitary Workers 2700 2079 621 Total 3057 2218 802 The total sanctioned posts in the Public health department is 3057, out of which only 2138 posts are filled indicating a very high vacancy ratio of 29 percent. Service Adequacy and Key Issues System Adequacy. The ULB manages to collect approximately 410 MT, 91.5 percent of the Waste collection, through employement of efficient collection and transportation. Table 4.4.7: Municipal Solid Waste Indicators Indicator Units Service Status - Norms 2005 Per Capita Generation Gms/Day 406 < 400 Garbage Collected (% collected to Percent 91.50 100 generated) Road Length per Conservancy 400 – m 238 Staff (Including Contract Laborers) 600 m Conservancy staff per 1,000 Nos. 2.34 3 population Source: Analysis Based on the information collected and field visits, the key issues of solid waste management in Madurai have been identified and presented in this section. Key indicators are used to assess service adequacy of Madurai Corporation. Absence of Effective Primary Collection Mechanism. The absence of the door to door solid waste collection system in the city is leading to filthy and
68 unhealthy conditions in the city. Segregation of waste is not being practiced in the city. Besides, there is no arrangement for disposal of Bio medical Waste, which in turn is dumped along with general garbage and some of it is disposed on the banks of the River Vaigai. Segregation and primary collection of waste through private participation, is under active consideration by the ULB. Inadequate Collection Vehicles. Inadequate collection vehicles, mainly Handcarts and Tricycles, is hampering the collection efficiency. Also additional transfer station and dumper bins needs to be located at various locations in the City. Future Inadequacy of Waste Dumping Facility. Based on the present method of disposal, Waste Dumping, it is estimated that the facility will reach its ultimate Capacity by 2011, thus indicating a need to further land acquisition. Lack of Scientific Waste Disposal. As the scientific disposal of waste is not followed, the waste is being disposed through open dumping. The waste is disposed improperly forming heaps of waste at the site, posing problem to environment and health of the local people. Though the data pertaining to the ground water quality around the site is not available, there is a probability of ground water contamination due to leaching. Occupation Health Hazards. The waste collection, loading and unloading operations have been done manually. The sanitary workers have not provided with any protective equipment posing heath hazards. 4.5 Transportation and Traffic Management Exiting Situation-Roads Overview: The ULB’s role regarding roads comprises construction of major roads and maintenance of all roads in its jurisdiction, except roads belonging to PWD and Highway Department. The ULB is also responsible for implementing proposals from master plan with regards new major roads and road widening activities. The existing road system comprises of 2 NH’s, 7 MDR’s and other roads, totalling upto a road length of approximately 615 kms within the Corporation limits. According to Madurai land use for 2001, total area earmarked under circulation and transport use in the City is 8.29 sq.km, approximately 18.17 percent of the developed area. However, in actual this is not maintained due to mixed landuses, encroachments and unclear demarcation of road widths. Madurai Corporation is maintaining 520 kms length of roads and 61 kms length of pavement lanes and sidewalks. With regards to the surface condition of municipal roads, about 79 percent of the total municipal road length have surfaced roads (comprising BT and CC surfaces). In addition to the above there is approximately 48 kms of unapproved road (roads within housing layouts, society’s and others), which is under process for transfer to the ULB. Table 4.5.1 presents the road types along with their lengths. Table 4.5.1: Distribution of Roads in Madurai Corporation Roads Length Distributio n
69 Km % Municipal Roads Surfaced Roads Black Topped 429.73 73.90 Cement Concrete 30.60 5.30 Unsurfaced Roads WBM 45.08 7.80 Cut Stone Slabs/Concrete Slabs/Pavements 61.21 10.50 Earthen/Kutcha 14.69 2.50 Sub-Total 581.31 100.00 Other Departmental Roads Highways and Major District Roads 34.00 Sub-Total 34.00 Total 615.31 Service Adequacy and Key Issues System Adequacy: The density of roads in the town is 11.84 km/sq. km. The per capita road length maintained by the local body is 0.66 m, which is less than the standard of 1.75 m. The condition of major roads is good. However, minor roads and roads within individual residential colonies are in bad condition. Footpaths and parking facilities are lacking on the streets. The road indicators are illustrated in the Table 4.5.2. Table 4.5.2: Municipal Roads Indicators Indicator Units Service Status (Km / Sq.km) (2004-05) Road Density 11.84 Per Capita Road Length m 0.66 Percent Municipal Surfaced Roads Percent 79.00 Percent of Black Topped Roads to Total Percent 73.40 Road Length Percent Annual Increase in Road Length Percent over past 5 years Source: Analysis. Based on the information collected and field visits, the key issues facing the roads and transport corridors of Madurai have been identified and presented in this section. Key indicators are used to assess service adequacy of Madurai Corporation. Inadequate Coverage. There is only 0.58 m Per Capita road coverage as compared to a norm of 1.75 m Per Capita coverage, attributed to the high population density. Inadequate coverage is noticed in the newly developed layouts and in the extended areas. High Density and Congested Lanes. Roads in the temple areas and old city areas are narrow and surrounded by heavily built up areas. These roads also carry large volumes of traffic due to wholesale markets and commercial trading in the area. These factors make the lanes highly susceptible to air pollution and delayed travel times. Encroachment. The margins of roads are encroached upon in several sections of major roads of the city by illegal parking and other informal activities. With
70 no margins left on the roads, the effective carriageway of the road is reduced drastically leading to congestion and accidents. Absence of Street Furniture/Signage’s. The roads lack signals, signages, and footpaths. Improper road sweeping results in most roads being covered with silty soil, which reduces the driving safety.
4.6 Traffic and Transportation Exiting Situation Road Network / Traffic Pattern: the travel pattern in the City is guided by the road network and land use pattern in the town. The road pattern also makes a lot of through traffic to pass through the City, due to the converging pattern of major regional roads. The road network in Madurai is visible in distinct clear patterns. Firstly, the concentric square pattern of streets around the Temple; Secondly, the radial pattern of main roads leading to other major urban centers of the State and thirdly, the partial ring roads which connects the radial roads at few points. Because of these incomplete linkages and inadequate widths especially in the central area and railway crossings, radial roads and ring roads suffer from bottlenecks and congestion. Some of the major limitations noticed in the existing system of roads are inadequate road widths, inadequacy of pedestrian sidewalks, absence of cycle tracks, and absence of parking spaces and bus lay by. Congestion is also caused by presence of commercial traffic, mainly trucks loading unloading goods from markets, since the town is a major trade and commerce centre in South Tamil Nadu. A comprehensive Traffic and Transportation study for Madurai was made by the Division of Traffic and Urban Systems Engineering, Anna University in 1996. In this study the existing and the future travel demand has been analysed to evaluate the transportation network sufficiency. According to this study, the bye passable traffic on Tirunelveli Road, Melur Road, Natham Road and Dindigul Road is more than that of other roads. Similarly, the volume of vehicle movement from various radial roads towards CBD along Dindigul Road, Melur Road, Ramnad Road and Tirunelveli Road, both inbound and outbound, is found to be predominant. It indicates that traffic flow is increasing in the corridors of the city causing the traffic congestion and in resultant problems. Hence, the formation of ring road attracts priority work among other developments. Major Traffic Bottlenecks. Major traffic bottlenecks include railway level crossings, narrow high level bridge across the river Vaigai, railway over bridge and poorly designed intersections. There are three railway level crossings on the major roads that cause inordinate delays for the road users due to the frequent gate closure for long duration. There are four river crossings and four Rail Over Bridges. Major road intersections viz. Yanaikal junction, Simmakkal junction, Kattabomman Statue junction, Junction of Melaperumal Maistry road and T.P.K road, and Munichalai road junction near Dinamani Talkies are poorly designed, and are prone to serious traffic congestions, given the heavy volume of traffic and bulk pedestrian movement at these places.
71
On road vehicle speed is an indicator for traffic congestion and the capacity constraint on Road. Origin Destination Studies and Speed Flow Studies conducted for Madurai, in 20016, as a part of studies for Re location of Whole Sale Market outside City Limits, is available. The study noted that the vehicle speed in Madurai along major roads varies from above 40 kms per hour along Bypass Road, varies between 17 kms per hour and 25 kms per hour around the periphery of the Old City areas (West and South Veli Streets) and reduces to a low of approximately 6.50 kms per hour around the Temple Area (North Masi Street). Indicated figures, are based on survey conducted in 2001. Growth in Tourist activities and vehicle is expected to have deteriorated the situation further in the following years. Hence, a demand is felt for undertaking critical traffic management measures and undertake Projects (Shifting of Wholesale Market, Provisions to meet Parking demand, Pedestrianization of Selective Areas around Main Temple, etc.), to meet excessive traffic demand of the City. Parking Demand: Land Use and Economic Activities in the City drive the Parking demand in the City. Here, the City is a major regional center for Trade and Commerce in southern Tamil Nadu and also an important Tourist Location in International and National Tourist Map, which drives the heavy influx of Floating Population. Consequently, heavy movement of Vehicular Traffic has increased congestion and induced Parking demand within the ULB area. Heavy Paring demand is witnessed around roads within the Core City Area, around the Main Temple, and other tourist locations. The is need for locating Multi Storied Parking lots at important locations within the ULB area. Based on Parking Demand Study for 20017, it is estimated that the existing peak hour parking demand in the Old City is approximately 200 Parking Car Equivalent (PCE’s). Based on a surge in Tourism Activities and therefore Parking demand, present day demand is estimated at approximately 250 PCE’s. Detailed proposal based on Consultant’s study has been prepared for accommodating the Parking Demand near Main Temple, by shifting the Whole Sale Market to outskirts of the ULB and using the land area for construction of Multi storeyed Parking Facility (G+2 floor). Service Adequacy and Key Issues Traffic Congestion. Major roads leading to other important urban centers of the State follow radial pattern and converge towards the central area of the city resulting in over accumulation of traffic in the central area. Because of the inadequate widths especially in the central area and railway crossings, radial roads and ring roads suffer from bottlenecks and congestion. Presence of major Whole Sale Market near the Temple Area, also induces more congestion and pressure on the Exiting Core Area Roads. Absence of Peripheral Ring Road. In absence of a complete peripheral Ring Road, regional traffic is directed into the City thus causing congestion and delay due to Heavy Moving Vehicles.
6 Based on Detailed Project Report for Design of Market and Multi-Storied Parking Facility at Madurai, TNUIFSL 7 Based on Detailed Project Report for Design of Market and Multi-Storied Parking Facility at Madurai, TNUIFSL
72 Traffic Bottlenecks. Absence of Rail Over Bridges and narrow width of existing Bridges and Culverts, causes traffic bottlenecks and congestion in the City. Absence of Sub ways at important junctions is also noticed as a cause of congestion. Inadequate Parking Areas. Heavy congestion is created by high vehicular density in the City (Local Traffic and Floating Traffic), especially in the Core Areas and important Tourist locations, which is not adequately served with infrastructure facilities like Parking area. Traffic management measure, like One Way System, has been implemented but fails to address the Problem effectively. Absence of Proper Truck Terminus. Although, being a center for trade and commerce in the region, the City is not provided with a proper Truck Terminal and ancillary facilities, which induces congestion due to inflow of Goods Carriage Vehicles within the City Area. 4.7 Street Lighting
Existing Situation – Street Lighting The ULB is divided into four Zones, for provision and maintenance of Street lighting. The Street light Section of the ULB is under the purview of the Assistant Engineer, Street lights, who manages operations in Four Zones with Four AEE’s. The provision and maintenance of streetlights is an obligatory function of Madurai City Corporation. The City Corporation installs new streetlight poles and the power is supplied by TNEB . The ULB is provided with 24,103 street lights at approximately 30 m interval, to lit the City. Discussion indicated a high efficiency of operation with approximately 97.5 percent of the Street lights in working condition. SV lamps are provided along major corridors and 10 Nos. High Mast Lights are provided at major junctions. The Corporation Streetlights details are presented in the Table 4.7.1.
Table 4.7.1: Composition of Streetlights Type of Fixture Numbers Distribution (Nos.) (%) High Mast Lamps 10 0.04 Sodium Vapor Lamps 7,987 33.14 Tube lights 16,012 66.43 Ordinary Bulbs 94 0.39 Total 3,644 100.00 Tubelight constitutes more than 66 percent of the Total Light fixtures in the City followed by Sodium Vapor Lamps with about 33 percent. Only 10 high mast lamp is installed at major Road Junctions. ULB Initiatives for Power Saving. Madurai is part of ‘Cities for Climate Protection’ Project sponsored by ICLEI and as per a study conducted in 2004 which recommended power saving through use of retrofit fixtures and power saving switches. The project is being implemented on trial basis at some locations. The ULB has
73 installed power switches at 10 locations (10 High Mast Lights), and have detected an estimated saving of Rs 0.38 lakh per yer per light post. Using of power saver switches at more location across the ULB is under active consideration. Service Adequacy and Key Issues Table 4.7.2: Municipal Street lights indicators Indicator Units Current Situation Spacing between Lamp Posts Mt 30 Tube Lights (% to Total) Percent 71.84 High Power Lamps (% to Total) Percent 26.72 Source: Analysis Key issues are related to power fluctuation and short circuit problems leading to low carrying capacity of the cables and improper street lighting in the newly formed extension areas and major junctions due to inadequacy of light poles. 4.8 Social Infrastructure Health The public health department of Madurai Corporation looks after the health care system. The town has both government and private run hospitals and clinics. There approximately 226 hospitals (major and minor), of which are 26 Major Hospitals, 45 Maternity and Family Planning Centers, approximately 37 Nursing Homes and other small Clinics. The major hospitals are Rajaji Government Hospital (Ward No. 21), Christian Mission Hospital (Ward No. 46), Arvind Eye Hospital (Ward No. 7), Meenakshi Hospital, Grace Kennet Hospital and Appolo Orient Hospital. The Corporation maintains 16 Maternity homes , 17 Urban health posts and 19 Dispenseries within the ULB Limits. Apart from these, there are Allopathy, Siddha, Ayurvedic Dispensaries maintained by the Corporation. There is one School health team that serve school going children. There are separate wings in the Health Department of the Corporation, responsible for Malaria and Mosquito Control and School Health program. Some of the major issues relating to health care noticed in the City are Inadequate Bed Strength, Ill Equipped and Inadequate Operation Theatre in the Government Hospitals, Ill equipped Corporation Dispeseries and Health Posts, and Unsafe Hospital Waste Disposal practice. Further in MMC are, there are 456 doctors are practising and the doctor ratio with population is 1:2400 and there are 340 Private Hospitals functioning in the city. The total no. of beds are 4280 and the Bed ratio with population is 4:1000. Further 43 Nos. of Medical Officers and 48 paramedical staffs are working in Madurai Corporation. For General Sanitation there are 40 Nos. of Sanitary Inspectors and 72 of Conservancy Inspections and 60 Sanitary Supervisors with 2130 Nos. of Sanitary Workers. The Health Section is responsible for conservancy, Food quality control, Preventive measures, Birth and Death Registration, Animal Birth control etc.
74 As per Birth Death register maintained by the Corporation, the City registered 19,199 births and 3,191 deaths in 2004, are registered the details of death and birth rates are presented in table 4.8.1 below: Table 4.8.1: Basic Health Indicators, 2004 Parameter Value Birth Rate 19.3 Death Rate 3.2 Still Birth Rate 5.00 Infant Morality Rate 8.90 Maternal Morality Rate 0.64 ULB assisted Programs and Schemes. The ULB implementing several health improvement schemes, viz., Malaria Eradication Program, Mother and Child Care Program, Family Welfare Program, Pulse Polio Program, School Health Program and Vizhavoli Thettam. Some of the major programs are elaborated below. Malaria Eradication Program. There is a separate wing in health department responsible for Control of Malaria and Mosquito control. There are 2 sub unit officers for this program with 4 sanitary inspectors and 60 Sanitary Workers for ante mosquito activities. These workers are responsible for spraying insecticides, throwing of sawdust balls in the water stagnant areas, etc. Mother and Child Care Program. The ULB has set up several Health Posts and Maternity homes, giving importance to antenatal and check up cases, instrumental delivery and high risk cases. Arrangements have been made to recommend risk identified cases on priority basis to Government Hospital for advanced treatment. Vazhavoli Thettam. Apart from the school, health programs that carryout medical check up in schools; the Government has implemented the Vazhvoli thittam, program for health check up and care for students. About 355 schools are covered under this program and all the medical officers are involved in this program. Besides, Cataract detection and treatment, diabetic detection and treatment are also carried out in co operation with Government hospitals and Voluntary organization. Education Madurai houses government education institutions along with aided and private institutions the literacy rate in the city is 87.01 percent and is high in comparison to the district figure of 77.82 percent. Education deapartment of the ULB is under the purview of the Corporation Education Officer. For the ULB operated Schoold, provision of Staff and Services, and maintenance of School builidings is under the puview of the ULB. Madurai Corporation maintains 74 schools comprising of Primary, Middle, High School and Higher Secondary Schools with student strength of 26,562 nos. Of the 73 schools, 4 are operated in rented buildings. The total strength of teaching staffs in the Corporation schools is 1008 and non teaching staffs are 188. The ratio between numbers of students per teacher in State Government run institutions is about one teacher for 26 students
75 Table 4.9.2: Growth in Houses and Households. Type of Schools Municipal Corporation-run Nos Students No of Teachers Enrolled Elementary schools 43 8,962 Middle schools 11 5,002 High Schools 11 2,540 Higher Secondary 9 10,058 Schools Total 73 26,562 1008 The Education Department of Madurai Corporation is headed by Corporation Education Officer. The Corporation Maintain 74 schools of which 9 Higher Secondary Schools, 11 High Schools, 18 Middle Schools and 25 Primary Schools with student strength of 26562. The total strength of teaching staff 1008 and non teaching staff 188. In a phased manner, MMC is taking steps to upgrade the Elementary Schools to Middle School, Middle Schools to High School & Higher Secondary Schools. Every year the No. of class rooms are also increased so as to admit more No. of students in the Corporation School. The Corporation makes the payment of pension bills of the education staff, while the government treasury handles the salary payments. The Corporation does good service to urban poor in this Education Sector with latest Syllabi including Computer Education. There is a proposal to have an Arts and Science College for Corporation School students shortly.
76 5 MUNICIPAL FINANCE 5.1 Finances of Madurai Corporation
Overview: Madurai Corporation maintains a Corporation fund for managing the finances of the Corporation. The accounts of the Municipal/Corporation fund were maintained on a cash based single entry system till the FY 1999 2000. The financial status of the Corporation has been reviewed for the past four years, commencing from the financial year 2000 01. This section contains a description of the Corporation finances, the sources and uses of funds, and an assessment of Corporation finances based on important financial indicators. Currently the urban local bodies of Tamil Nadu maintain three separate funds, namely General Fund (Revenue Fund), Water & Drainage Fund and Education Fund. For the purpose of this analysis, Education fund has clubbed in to General fund. For further analysis, the items of each fund are categorized under the following major heads. Revenue Account: All recurring items of income and expenditure are included under this head. These include taxes, charges, salaries, maintenance expenditure, debt servicing etc. Capital Account: Income and expenditure items under this account are primarily non recurring in nature. Income items include loans, contributions by GoTN, other agencies and capital grants under various State and Central Government programs, revenue account transfer for capital works and income from sale of assets. Expenditure items include expenses booked under developmental works and purchase of capital assets. Deposits and Advances: Under the Corporation accounting system, certain items are compiled under advances and deposits. These items are temporary in nature and are essentially adjustments for the purpose of recoveries and payments. Items under this head include library cess, income tax deductions, pension payments, provident fund, payment and recoveries of advances to employees and contractors, etc. 9,000.00 5.2 Financial Status 8,000.00 7,000.00 Total Revenue Revenue income of 6,000.00 Income Corporation has grown to 5,000.00 4,000.00 Rs. 7,963.58 Lakh in the 3,000.00 Total FY 2003 04 from Rs. Revenue Amount in2,000.00 Rs. Lakh Expenditure 6,960.50 Lakh in FY 2000 1,000.00 01, at an annual growth of 4.59 percent. Revenue 2000 01 2001 02 2002 03 2003 04 expenditure increased at Year an average annual rate of Figure 5.2.1: Total Revenue Income and Expenditure Trend
77 6.78 percent from Rs. 6,279.35 Lakh to Rs. 7,645.77 Lakh during the assessment period. The revenue account maintains surplus during the entire assessment period except during 2001 02 and maintained a maximum surplus of Rs. 2,159.86 Lakh in 2002 03. High revenue income during the FY 02 03 has attributed to transfer of previous years ULB’s share of State Finance Commission Grant (SFC) allocation and Surcharge on stamp duty. During the FY 01 02 high revenue expenditure incurred due to high debt servicing. Revenue income and expendiure trend in presented in Figure 5.2.1 Table 5.2.1: Summary of Corporation Fund Item 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 Amount in Rs. Lakh Revenue Account Revenue Income 6,960.50 5,737.83 8,412.64 7,963.58 Revenue Expenditure 6,279.35 8,227.57 6,252.77 7,645.77 Surplus/Deficit 681.15 (2,489.75) 2,159.86 317.81 Capital Account Capital Income 2,664.34 3,072.40 2,447.85 4,249.92 Capital Expenditure 2,711.83 1,436.12 1,667.93 3,480.08 Surplus/Deficit (47.49) 1,636.29 779.92 769.84 Fiscal Status 633.66 (1,401.08) 2,579.82 (514.11) Advances & Deposits Extraordinary Income 204.63 26.27 37.86 18.08 Extraordinary Expenditure 11.92 1.80 137.30 12.62 Surplus/Deficit 192.70 24.47 (99.44) 5.46 Overall Fiscal Status 212.84 128.86 178.30 112.00 Source: Analysis. Note: Figures in parentheses indicates a deficit. Capital Income includes revenue account transfer for capital works. 4,500.00 Capital income comprises of 4,000.00 loans, grants and contribution 3,500.00 Total 3,000.00 Capital Income in the form of initial deposit for 2,500.00 water supply connections, 2,000.00 sewer connections, revenue 1,500.00 Total Capital account transfer for capital Amount in Rs. Lakh1,000.00 Expenditure works and sale proceeds of 500.00 assets. Majority of the capital 2000 01 2001 02 2002 03 2003 04
income is in the form of grants Year and loans. The capital Figure 5.2.2: Total Capital Income and account has witnessed Expenditure Trend surplus except during FY 01 02 (refer Figure 5.2.2), implying loan drawn and grant received was utilized less for capital works. Fiscal status of revenue account and capital account status witnessed inconsistent in terms surplus during the entire assessment period. During the FY 03 04, major share of capital expenditure were incurred from public works and Roads asset creation.
78 The following sections present detailed review of revenue and capital accounts, primarily aimed at assessing the Corporation fiscal status and providing a base for determining the ability of Corporation to sustain the planned investments. 5.3 Revenue Account The revenue account comprises of two components, revenue income and revenue expenditure. Revenue income comprises of internal resources in the form of tax and non tax items and external resources in the form of shared taxes/ transfers and revenue grants from the State Government. Revenue expenditure comprises of expenditure incurred on establishments, operation & maintenance and debt servicing. Revenue Income. The revenue sources of Corporation can be Tax Own Sources broadly categorized as own Revenue Grants 28% sources, assigned revenues and 32% grants. The source wise income generated during the review period is presented in Table 5.3.1. The base and basis of each income source has been further elaborated in the Assigned Revenues following section. The revenue Non Tax Own 15% income of Madurai Corporation Sources has increased from Rs. 5,834.52 19% Lakh in 2000 01 to Rs. 6869.35 Figure 5.3.1: Source of Income (2000 to 2004) Lakh in 2003 04 – at a nominal Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of about 5.59 percent. The revenue income has declined from Rs. 7,167.30 Lakh in 2002 03 to Rs. 6,869 Lakh in 2003 04. During the financial year 2002 03 the Madurai Corporation has received maximum surcharge on stamp duty to the tune of Rs. 1,245.22 Lakh and State Finance Commission Grant to the tune of Rs. 2,186.73 Lakh (inconsistent transfer of ULB share), which attributed to high revenue income during the same period. The sources of revenue income is presented in Figure 5.3.1. Table 5.3.1: Sources of Revenue Income Item 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 Amount in Rs. Lakh Own Sources Tax 1,700.61 1,578.11 1,921.01 1,585.90 Non Tax 1,426.88 1,391.88 1,336.80 1,938.33 Assigned Revenue 753.90 1,519.10 344.51 1,280.49 Grants 1,988.13 2,390.38 2,064.63 1,250.13 Total (excl. W&D A/C) 5,834.52 4,599.64 7,167.30 6,869.35 Source: Analysis.
79 Own source income includes income from resource mobilization activities of Corporation in the form of taxes, income from Corporation properties and markets, building permit fee, trade licences, income from fees and fines, etc. Own revenue sources are further classified as tax revenue and non tax sources that are generated by various sections of the Corporation. The salient features of the revenue head is detailed below: Own Sources/Tax. This item head comprises of income sourced primarily from property tax (General purpose tax, Lighting tax, Scavenging tax and Education tax excluding Water and Drainage tax), professional tax and other taxes. The property tax is the largest revenue generating item. Own sources of tax income is presented in Table 5.3.2. Average income from own sources constituted 53.77 percent of the total revenue income during the review period and has increased at an average compounded annual growth rate of 4.45 percent. Tax sources contributed 28.34 percent of the revenue income and non tax sources contribute 25.44 percent of the revenue income. Income from Corporation properties, markets and other remunerative assets witnessed inconsistent in collection performance during the assessment period. Table 5.3.2: Own Sources of Revenue Income Item 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 Amount in Rs. Lakh Taxes Property Tax (excl. W&D 1,389.88 1,630.43 1,447.57 Tax) 1,518.25 Profession Tax 146.85 162.53 257.29 115.13 Other Taxes 35.51 25.70 33.29 23.20 Non - Taxes Income from ULB’s 406.67 466.29 547.79 494.94 Properties License Income (Trade, 127.94 136.60 134.46 136.73 etc.) Income from Fees and 176.85 177.70 218.86 225.39 Fines Miscellaneous Income 680.42 646.29 435.69 1,081.28
Total (excl. W&D A/C) 3,005.00 3,257.82 3,524.23 3,092.49 Source: Analysis. Property Tax: This is the most important category of own source income to the Corporation. Madurai Corporation levies a consolidated property tax of 27 percent of the Annual Ratable Value (ARV). During the assessment period, the numbers of property tax assessments increased at an average growth rate of 2.24 percent per annum. Property tax current demand however has increased at a CAGR of about 0.47 percent during the assessment period. Professional Tax: The Corporation also collects professional tax from all registered organisations, companies or firms, public or private, individuals and State & Central Government departments. Currently 19,800 assesses are registered with the Corporation. Based on the demand, the average tax per
80 professional is about Rs. 422/ per annum.
Own Sources/Non Tax. This item head comprises of income from Corporation properties, fees on Corporation services (building permission, etc.), income from interest on investment and miscellaneous services. On an average, through the assessment period, own source/non tax income constitutes 23.86 percent of the total revenue income. Income from remunerative enterprises, income from fees and fines constitute the major revenue sources under this item head. Income through non tax own sources of the Corporation has grown over the assessment period at a CAGR of about 11.67 percent. Remunerative Enterprises: Income from remunerative enterprises is the non tax income in the form of rentals from assets like shopping complexes, market fee, parking fee and income from other real assets owned by the Corporation. Income from the remunerative assets of the Corporation contributed 8 percent of the revenue income during the assessment period and registered a CAGR of 6.77 percent. Income from Corporation properties, markets and other remunerative assets witnessed inconsistent collection performance during the assessment period. The average revenue mobilized during the review period under this item head is Rs. 478.92 Lakh. Rent/leases recovery from the shopping complexes and other assets are low during the FY 2003 04. Assigned Revenues: This item head comprises of income from Government of Tamil Nadu (GoTN)/State transfers of Corporation income collected by the state line department. Transfers are in the form of Corporation’s share of taxes levied and collected by GoTN from establishments/operations within the Corporation limits. Surcharge on transfer of immovable properties and entertainment tax, are the major items on which these revenues are realized by Corporation (refer Table 5.3.3). Table 5.3.3: Income from Assigned Revenue Item 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 Amount in Rs. Lakh Entertainment Tax 281.88 69.79 273.58 339.07 Surcharge on Stamp Duty 443.11 274.67 896.76 1,245.52 Other Transfers 28.91 0.05 44.66 Total 753.90 344.51 1,519.10 1,280.49 Share in total Revenue 12.92 7.49 21.19 18.64 Income (%) Growth (%) (54.30) 340.94 (15.71) Source: Analysis. Income through assigned revenues contributes around 15.06 percent of revenue income and it is growing at an average compounded annual growth rate of 19.31 percent during the review period. It is observed that the inflow from this account head has been inconsistent due to delays in transfers and deductions at source towards Corporation debt repayment commitments and/ or other dues payable to GoTN. Entertainment Tax: The Commercial Tax (CT) Department collects
81 entertainment tax from 38 cinema halls (with a total capacity of 19,500 seats) functioning within Corporation limit. The CT Department transfers 90 percent of the total tax collection to Corporation, and retains 10 percent towards management charges. Entertainment tax accounts for around 3.78 percent of total revenue income. Stamp Duty: Surcharge on stamp duty is another assigned revenue source, accounting for 11 percent of revenue income during the assessment period. It is levied in the form of a surcharge on stamp duty applicable on all properties registered or transferred within Corporation limits. The Registration Department collects and 90 percent of the collections are transferred to Corporation. Revenue Grants and Contribution. This item mainly comprises revenue grants and compensations from the State Government under various heads. The regular grants include the SFC grants and the others include aid grants, grants for services like roads, buildings, maternity and child welfare, public health, contributions for elementary and secondary schools and etc. Grants which are for specific purposes are ad hoc in nature. In case of Madurai Corporation, revenue grants and contributions constitute about 31.17 percent of the total revenue income and have registered an average annual growth rate of 1.27 percent. SFC Devolution is major item of grants, which is transferred as part SFC recommendation. The fluctuation in SFC grant is due to delay and deduction at source. Table 5.3.4: Income from Revenue Grants Item 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 Amount in Rs. Lakh State Finance Commission 947.87 2,186.73 1,921.05 Grant 1,858.00 Other Grants 130.13 302.26 203.65 143.58
Total 1,988.13 1,250.13 2,390.38 2,064.63 Share in total Revenue 34.08 27.18 33.35 30.06 Income (%) Growth (%) (37.12) 91.21 (13.63) Source: Madurai Corporation & Analysis. Revenue Expenditure: Revenue expenditure of Corporation has been Debt Servicing analyzed based on expenditure 17% heads broadly classified under the following departments General Administration and Tax collection, Establishments Public Works and Roads, Street 69% Lighting, Public Health & Operation & Maintenance Conservancy, Town Planning and 14% Miscellaneous Items. Water supply and drainage revenue expenditure is analysed separately and the same is presented in the following section. Figure 5.3.2: Items of Revenue Expenditure Revenue expenditure is further (2000 to 2004)
82 classified under Establishment, Operation & Maintenance and Debt Servicing. The details of revenue expendiure is presented in Table 5.3.5. Item of revenue expenditure is presented in Figure 5.3.2. Table 5.3.5: Sector wise Revenue Expenditure Item 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 Amount in Rs. Lakh Establishment 4,470.76 4,349.25 4,064.76 3,767.93 Operation & Maintenance 750.08 533.99 820.90 1,141.02 Debt Servicing 52.52 2,696.64 127.15 1,754.23
Total (excl. W&D A/C) 7,295.39 5,297.30 6,663.18 5,273.36 Growth (%) 38.34 (27.39) 25.78 Source: Madurai Corporation & Analysis. Establishment Expenditure. Establishment expenditure alone accounts for about 80 percent of revenue expenditure, excluding water supply and drainage account. About 69 percent of the total revenue income is utilised for payment of salaries excluding water supply and drainage staff salary and other related expenses. Debt servicing of the Corporation accounts for around 17 percent of the revenue expenditure was made from general fund during the review period. For the assessment period, revenue expenditure grew at an average rate of 8.11 percent; while growth in revenue income was only 5.59 percent during the same period. This indicates that revenue and education fund of Corporation is in deficit. Further, while expenditure on establishment grown at a negative annual average rate of 5.54 per cent, expenditure on O&M grew at an average rate of 15.01 percent per annum indicating that the Operations and maintenance expenditure need to be controlled. Public health conservancy O&M increased by 1.47 times and street lighting by 1.44 times during the financial year 2002 03 to 2003 04.
The following table presents General Administration sector /department wise salary 16% Water Supply Engineering Wing 20% expenditure incurred during the 0% Street Lighting assessment period. Since, the 3% Public Health department wise establishment 0% expenditure was not furnished in Other Departments 8% the account statement Town Planning (consolidated figures only 12% available in the 2000 series) consultant were used the third Solid Waste Mangement SFC questionnaires for working 41% out the department wise salary. Over 41 percent spent for Figure 5.3.3: Sector Wise Salary Composition (2000 to 2004) conservancy staffs salary and around 16 percent for general administration departments include revenue collection and administration department salary. Water supply staff salary contributes about 20 percent of the
83 total expenditure incurred towards establishments. Table 5.3.5: Sector wise Salary Item 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 Amount in Rs. Lakh General Administration 525.21 512.86 499.34 525.21 Engineering Department 13.10 13.27 13.42 13.60 Conservancy 1,270.45 1,460.43 1,220.45 1,241.87 Public Health 14.08 14.53 15.03 15.58 Street Lighting 73.28 84.11 84.89 85.59 Water Supply 665.00 652.53 652.53 609.53 Town Planning 400.28 365.16 390.16 398.17 Other Departments 209.87 266.90 272.21 237.73 Total 3,171.27 3,369.79 3,148.03 3,127.28 Growth (%) Source: SFC Questionnaire Document Establishment expenditure of all sections (excluding water and drainage account) accounts for an average of 70 percent of revenue expenditure. Though the growth rate of establishment expenses has fallen the actual results of privatisation efforts are yet to reflect on accounts. In the coming years, these expenses are expected to go down due to the reforms taken up by the Corporation. It is necessary that the Corporation goes ahead with such privatisation initiatives so as to improve upon and allocate more amounts for the O&M and debt servicing. Operations & Maintenance: Operation and maintenance expenditure of all sections together accounts for 15 percent of revenue expenditure and had increased at an average rate of 10.92 percent per annum. General Administration, Public health & conservancy, Street lighting are the major expenditure items. O&M expenses are dominated by power charges for street lighting and that for general administration, while that for the upkeep of roads has been very minimal. Street lighting sector can be put for privatisation and implement energy conservation measures to curtail the costs on repairs, replacements and power charges. Debt Servicing: A review of the outstanding loan statement of Corporation, as on March 31, 2005, i.e., at the start of the FY 2004 05 reveals that the net outstanding debt liabilities of Corporation are at Rs. 9838.47 Lakh. Table 5.3.6 details out the agency wise outstanding loans. Table 5.3.6: Out standing Loan Statement Item Loan Amount Outstanding Amount in Rs. Lakh Government of Tamil Nadu 1,025.00 1,025.00 GoTN + LIC WS 937.30 620.31 IUDP WS 90.10 90.10 TWAD WB WS 5,473.10 5,473.10 TUFIDCO Bridge /Roads 1,522.30 1,146.09
84 TWAD HUDCO WS 466.53 956.37 WSPF UGD 608.73 527.50 Total 10,123.06 9,838.47 Source: Analysis. The total amount of loans drawn by the Corporation till date is Rs. 10,123.06 Lakh, majority of it from TWAD, Government of Tamilnadu and TUFIDCO. It needs mention that the ratio of outstanding loans to current demand of property tax is about 413.69 percent. The ratio in terms of ARV (estimated at Rs. 6,824) is 0.91; thereby indicating that the Corporation is capable of leveraging additional debt to finance its projects as this is below the threshold of 2 to 3 (generally considered by Financial institutions). Debt servicing accounted for around 14.65 percent of revenue expenditure during the review period and the DSR (as % of revenue income) is around 17.82 percent, which is below the threshold level of 25 percent, as considered by financial institutions. The Corporation has to start to focus upon sustainable debt servicing after having cut down establishment costs to improve its credit rating and capability towards leveraging additional debts. 5.4 Capital Account Capital Income. Capital income comprises of loans, grants and own contributions. The detailed components of capital income are detailed in Table 5.4.1. An analysis of this account indicates that grants & contributions have contributed the maximum share of income under this account. While on an average 51 percent of the capital income is in the form of grants and contributions like XIIth Finance Commission grants for public works and roads, about 30 percent from revenue account transfer for capital works and 19 percent is in the form of loans from various agencies. New loans were acquired during the assessment period for public works and roads.
Table 5.4.1: Status of Capital Account General Item 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 Amount in Rs. Lakh Capital Income Capital Loans 712.70 1,522.3 0 Capital Grants and 1,227.6 2,158.9 277.44 591.03 contribution 1 4 Own Sources 0.14 549.39 359.99 1,602.6 7 Total (excl. W & D a/c) 1,940.4 2,708.3 637.43 3,716.0 5 3 0 Capital Expenditure General 36.96 161.27 7.08 300.77 Public Works and Roads 2,007.3 827.16 661.04 2,026.1 4 0 Street Lighting 14.12 7.95 18.27 30.60 Public Health & 1.47 31.34 3.20 1.03
85 Item 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 Amount in Rs. Lakh Conservancy Education Total 2,059.8 1,027.7 689.59 2,358.5 9 3 0 Surplus/Deficits (excl. W &D (119.44) 1,680.6 (52.16) 1,357.5 a/c) 1 0 Source: Analysis. Capital Expenditure. The majority of capital expenditure has been directed towards public works and roads, general purpose includes all item of works excluding water supply and drainage and roads over the past four years, this is due to fact TNUDF/TUFIDCO had funded most of the Corporation for roads during the assessment period. Analysis of capital income and capital expenditure notes that the account was in surplus during the FY 03 04, indicating lesser utilisation of allocated funds or just start of utilisation of allocated funds. Water supply and drainage capital account status is detailed in Table 5.4.2. Capital income is mainly from water supply and UGD loans and capital grants for water and drainage grant for ongoing UGD works. Capital account net status is inconsistent during assessment period. Table 5.4.2: Status of Water Supply and Drainage Capital Account Item 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 Amount in Rs. Lakh Capital Income Capital Loans 1,750.0 325.00 0 Capital Grants and 601.90 34.01 36.54 95.11 Contribution Own Sources 121.99 5.06 23.88 438.81 Total 723.89 364.07 1,810.42 533.92 Capital Expenditure Water supply 55.55 167.51 453.32 1,121.5 Drainage &Sanitation 596.39 240.88 525.02 8 1,121.5 Total 651.94 408.39 978.34 8 Surplus/Deficits 71.95 (44.32) 832.08 (587.66) Source: Analysis.
5.5 Assets and Liabilities Current assets and liabilities of Madurai Corporation include monies due to Corporation from debtors and monies due from Corporation to creditors, respectively. Table 5.5.1 presents a summary of the current assets and liabilities of Madurai Corporation.
86 The current assets include outstanding arrears in property tax, water charges and profession tax and lease rental (non tax items) dues. The total current assets due to Corporation are Rs. 4,091.06 lakh. Current liabilities include the payment of power charges due to TNEB, Salaries Payable, PF and other contribution due, tax /cess payable to government, other payables and deposits. The net liability of Madurai Corporation is Rs. 345.12 lakh. The current ratio is the ratio of total current assets to total current liabilities, which is used to measure short term liquidity of a ULB. The idea behind measuring this ratio is to assess whether the ULB has enough liquid assts to pay off its current obligations when they fall due. Intuitively one would expect that this ratio should be over 1. In case of Madurai Corporation, the current ratio is 11.85 and hence ULB has comfortable current ratio. However, property tax current and arrear recoverable amount itself Rs. 2,887 Lakh, it is almost 36 percent of the total revenue income of the Corporation (2003 04). This needs to be addressed immediately and better collection performance will improve the financial status of the corporation. Table 5.5.1: Summary of Current Assets and Liabilities status Description Amount (Rs. Lakh) A. Current Assets Property Tax Recoverable 2,887.04 Profession Tax Recoverable 229.39 Water Charges Recoverable 173.50 License/Lease/Rental/other Recoverable 136.31 Other Recoverable 402.41 Cash on Hand /Bank 262.41 Total – Current Assets 4,091.06 B. Current Liabilities Salaries Payable 1.21 PF and Other Contribution 42.00 TNEB 12.00 Library Cess Payable 161.04 Other Payables Recoveries from Staff 62.80 Deposits 66.07 Total – Current Liabilities 345.12 Net Status 3,745.94 Source: Madurai Corporation & Analysis. 5.6 Key Financial Indicators and Issues A set of key financial indicators has been derived using the financial data procured from the Corporation for the assessment period. Table 5.6.1 presents these indicators. These indicators are used to assess the Corporation performance with regards resource mobilization, fund utilization, financial performance and collection efficiencies. Table 5.6.1: Key Financial Indicators
87 Indicators Value Unit A Resource Mobilisation 1 Per Capita Income 555 Rs. p.a 2 Sources of Funds Share of Own Sources in Total Revenue Income a 60.92 % (RI) b Share of Property Tax in Total Revenue Income 33.19 % Share of Revenue Grants & Subsidies in Total c 26.34 % RI 3 Growth in Revenue Income 4.59 % p.a 4 Growth in Own Sources of Revenue Income 2.38 % 5 Per Capita Own Income 246 Rs. P.a B Fund Application 1 Per Capita Expenditure 544 Rs. p.a 2 Uses of Funds a Share of Establishment Expenditure in Total RE 70.36 % Share of O&M Expenditure in Total Revenue b 14.99 % Expenditure c Share of Establishment Expenditure to Total RI 67.40 % 3 Growth in Establishment Expenditure (3.15) % 4 Growth in O&M Expenditure 10.92 % 5 Growth in Total Revenue Expenditure 9.77 % p.a C Liability Management 1 Per Capita Liability (2004 05 estimated) a Outstanding Debt per Capita 709 Rs. b Outstanding Non Debt Liability per Capita 350 Rs. c Total Outstanding Liability per Capita 1,059 Rs. As a Proportion of Property Tax Current Demand 2 (2003 04 estimated) a Outstanding Debt as % of P.T Demand 413.69 % Outstanding Non Debt Liability as % of P.T b 204.23 % Demand c Total Outstanding Liability as % of P.T Demand 617.92 % As a Proportion of Property Tax Own Revenue 3 Income (2003 04 estimated) Outstanding Debt as % of Own Revenue a 213.02 % Sources O/s Non Debt Liability as % of Own Revenue b 105.17 % Sources Total O/s Liability as % of Own Revenue c 318.19 % Sources 4 Non Debt Liability as % of Total Liability 33.05 % 5 Debt Servicing Ratio (D.S/ Revenue Income) 17.82 % D Performance Indicators 1 Operating Ratio 1.01 Ratio 2 Growth in Per Capita Own Income 0.81 % p.a 3 Growth in Per Capita Grant (2.26) % p.a
88 Indicators Value Unit 4 Growth in Per Capita Total Revenue Income 0.94 % p.a 5 Growth in Per Capita Establishment Expenditure (7.80) % p.a 6 Growth in Per Capita O&M Expenditure 5.88 % p.a 7 Growth in Per Capita Revenue Expenditure 3.06 % p.a 8 Capital Utilization Ratio 2.43 Ratio E Efficiency Indicators 1 Tax Collection Performance a Property Tax 70 % b Water Charges 80 % c Sewer Charges 78 % d Profession Tax 39 % 2 No. of P.T Assessments per Tax Collection Staff 1467 Nos. 3 Property Tax Demand per Assessment 1857 Rs. p.a 4 No. of Corporation Staff per 1000 Population 3.11 Nos. Rs. Annual Revenue (Own Source) per Corporation 5 8.18 Lakh Staff p.a Person 6 Population per Residential P.T Assessment 12.84 s Source: Analysis. Resource Mobilization Indicators: These indicators summarize the performance of the Corporation with regards sources of funds. Madurai Corporation derives about 60.92 percent of its revenue income from own sources, while grants account for just about 26.34 percent of the revenue income. Fund Application Indicators: These indicators are a measure to ascertain the utilization from the Corporation fund. Around 70 percent of the revenue expenditure is spent on establishment heads, only about 15 percent for O&M of Corporation assets and services. Leaving only 15 percent utilized for debt servicing. Establishment expenditure accounts for about 67.40 percent of the total revenue generated by the Corporation. Liability Management Indicators: These indicators are a measure to ascertain the utilization from the Corporation fund regards to debt servicing. The ratio of debt servicing to revenue income is 17.82 percent during the assessment period. The percapita average outstanding debt works out to 709 rupees and percapita non debt liability is 350 rupees. Out standing debt to property demand is around 413 percent and non debt liability is 204 percent times the property tax demand for the current year. Overall Financial Performance Indicator: These indicators are a measure to assess the overall financial performance of the Corporation with regards operational performance and effective growth in revenue income and expenditure. The average operating ratio during the assessment period was vulnerable at 1.01 and the capital utilization ratio was high at 2.43 indicating higher utilization of revenue account fund in asset creation. The indicators of growth in per capita income and expenditure item heads indicate the effective
89 growth, giving a performance measure relative to the growing population. Madurai Corporation has demonstrated only 0.94 percent annual growth in per capita revenue income during the assessment period, while the per capita revenue expenditure has grown at a significantly higher 3.06 percent during the corresponding period. Which indicates that as population increases revenue fund will be in deficit, so there is a need for controlling revenue expenditure. Efficiency Indicators: These indicators are essentially a measure to assess Corporation efficiency with regards revenue base coverage and realization. Madurai Corporation has maintained an average collection performance with regard to property tax and water charges. The average no of persons per residential assessment is at 12.84 indicates that the property tax base has lesser coverage. 5.7 Key Issues Key issues and conclusions are based on the review and assessment Corporation finances and discussions with relevant Corporation officials. Maintenance and Reporting of Accounts. The State Government deducts debt due by the Urban Local Body and then transfers funds (SFC devolution) the Urban Local Body records do not capture such apportionment. ULB’s do not maintain department/sector wise salary expenditure as mentioned in the ULB’s Accounting Manual. Revenue Realization. Taxes and charges are major own sources of revenue income. Being more dynamic in nature and within the control of the Urabn Local Body, these revenue incomes have potential to contribute more to the Corporation fund. Besides low tax rates and charges levied, the actual demand itself is not established. Key issues regarding the above comprise: Low water supply and drainage coverage witnessed there are chances of illegal or unauthorized connections in the city; Financial transaction trends not commensurate with population growth trends, resulting in reduction in per capita expenditure levels; Fund Application. Key issues regarding application from the Corporation fund comprise: About 70 percent of the total expenditure is on establishment related heads, leaving relatively lower amounts for expenditure on operation and maintenance of services. As per the Double Entry accounting system corporation contribution to capital works has been arrived by debit the Revenue Account as Revenue Expenditure and the same amount has been credited in the Capital Account and taken as Capital Income. During the year 2003 – 04 Revenue and Water Supply Account Surplus amount of Rs. 317.81 lakhs and Rs. 111.64 lakhs have been arrived after debiting of Corporation Contribution of Capital works of Rs. 1602.67 lakhs and Rs. 438.81 lakhs respectively. There was a huge deficit during the year 2001 – 02 has been arrived due to Heavy Short fall in the Government Grants. Further, the cash flow charts are enclosed for perusal.
90 6 SLUM SITUATION 6.1. Overview Owing to rapid urbanization in and around the town, large influx of the migrants has been observed, which has resulted in formation of slums. The town presents a wide range of activities in various Institutional, Commercial and Tourism sectors. Growth in such activities, possibilities of absorption in various service sectors, scope of employment in trade and business activities, hawking, retailing, carting etc. could have attracted rural poor to the town. The Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board (TNSCB) is the responsible authority for notifying and providing clearances to the Slums. The ULB is responsible agency for provision of Services to the urban poor residing in slums and within municipal limits. As per Census 2001 and Data available from the ULB, Madurai City consists of 208 slums, out of which 64 slums are notified (refer Figure 6.1). ULB figures for Slum Population indicate that approximately 60,257 households reside in the Slums accommodating 3.03 lakh populations. Discussions have indicated that presently more Slums have been notified, thus taking the tally to approximately 80 notified slums (refer Table 6.1.1), although slum listing for the same is not available. Madurai city, being an important trade and commerce centre in southern districts and famous for its heritage values, attracts many migrants from rural areas resulting in proliferation of illegal slums and squatter settlements. Most of these slums are located along the riverbanks and adjacent to transport corridors, encroaching both private and municipal land. 85 percent of the slums in the city are on Government land and 9.2 percent of corporation area. Most of the Notified Slums are provided with basic services and amenities. The major problem area in Slums is inadequate provision of Drains and Sanitation facilities. Table 6.1.1: Slum Population in Madurai
Wards Notified Slums Un– Notified Slums (Nos.) Nos. of Households Population Nos. of Households Population slums (Nos.) (Nos.) slums (Nos.) (Nos.) (Nos.) (Nos.) 1 2 662 3261 4 2031 10,153 2 2 155 774 1 520 2,600 3 2 1,480 7,397 1 89 445 4 8 2,236 11,184 1 110 550 5 3 1,131 5,567 2 432 2,158 6 1 509 2,847 1 128 643
91 Wards Notified Slums Un– Notified Slums (Nos.) Nos. of Households Population Nos. of Households Population slums (Nos.) (Nos.) slums (Nos.) (Nos.) (Nos.) (Nos.) 7 2 220 1,103 8 8 1,420 7,085 9 2 502 2,510 3 709 3,545 10 4 1,695 8,475 11 1 837 4,185 1 150 750 12 1 603 3,017 13 1 591 2,955 14 3 557 2,785 15 11 1,377 6,884 16 1 100 500 1 446 2,230 17 2 1496 7483 18 1 1,993 9,966 1 100 500 19 1 812 4,058 4 711 3,557 20 1 110 550 3 927 4,638 21 1 429 2,145 1 725 3,623 22 2 664 3,319 23 1 204 1,019 24 2 335 1,678 25 1 556 2,780 2 1,003 5,015 26 1 204 1,020 2 851 4,255 27 2 831 4,153 28 1 100 500 29 2 340 1,700 3 1,302 6,510 30 3 360 1,800 31 1 468 2,340 2 1,588 7,940 32 1 139 696 33 2 440 2,202 34 3 643 3,215 35 1 198 991 3 978 4,901 36 1 61 305 37 3 244 1,220 39 1 102 512 40 1 217 1,085 4 733 3,667 41 1 560 2,800 2 811 4,355 42 1 437 2,185 2 336 1,679 43 2 212 1,061 44 1 413 2064 45 1 409 2,044 48 1 216 1,080 49 1 576 2,880 50 3 696 3,481 51 2 1,397 6,988 1 60 300 53 4 1,263 6,313 55 1 297 1,488 1 419 2,097 57 1 171 854 58 6 828 5,493 59 3 1,733 8,668 3 725 3,624 60 1 384 1,920 61 1 385 1,928
92 Wards Notified Slums Un– Notified Slums (Nos.) Nos. of Households Population Nos. of Households Population slums (Nos.) (Nos.) slums (Nos.) (Nos.) (Nos.) (Nos.) 62 1 963 4,818 63 1 963 4,818 64 1 585 2,923 1 437 2,185 65 1 760 3,802 66 2 348 1,742 2 388 1,940 67 1 420 2,100 68 1 123 614 69 4 563 2,817 8 1,185 5,927 70 1 227 1,134 5 572 2,864 71 9 1,174 5,873 72 3 567 2,836 1 100 500 Total 64 25,090 125,633 144 35,167 177,508 Demographic data available on Slums indicates that slum population as a percentage share of Ward Population varies from a maximum of 69 percent in Ward 31 to 3 percent in Ward 39 and Ward 36. Although of the 208 Slums, maximum numbers of Slums are located in Ward 15 (11 Slum Areas) and Ward 69 (12 Slum Areas).
6.2. Service Provision in Slums
6.2.1 Housing. Hosing condition in slums found very poor. A large proportion of households were found staying in kutcha houses and remaining households stay in pucca houses, where, percentage of households staying in R.C.C. is very less. Majority of households reside in houses with built area less than 100 Sq. ft. It was noticed that residential status of most of the Unapproved Slum households was temporary, where settlement have developed within the last 10 years due to growing migration in the City. 6.2.2 Infrastructure Services Slums in Madurai lack proper infrastructure facilities, as like any other slum in the country. As per the discussion with the ULB officials, the overall view about the existing infrastructure in the slums is understood and presented below. To improve the condition of slums and to make slum dwellers self dependent, government is initiating various programs, which has been described in the following section. Water Supply: The main source of water supply in slums is met through hand pumps and public stand posts (PSPs). The local body has provided 2,548 units of Water Taps/Hand pumps/PSPs covering all the slums (951 PSP’s in Approved Slums and 1,597 PSP’s in Unapproved Slums). The slums at Gandhipuram Pandian Nagar, and Ramavarman Nagar have maximum number of water outlets with approximately 70 numbers serving about 7000 population and 4000 population respectively. Dependency on the Stand Posts is high, varies between a very high of approximately 1000 persons per PSP to a low of approximately 20
93 persons per PSP in Approved Slums. Average dependency is approximately 120 persons per PSP against the standard norm of 75 persons per hand pumps or PSPs. Sewerage and Sanitation: UGD facility is not present. Safe sanitation facilities comprise of public conveniences and ISPs. Public toilets are provided in 28 of 64 Approved Slums and 46 of 144 Unapproved Slums. The population in other slums use nearby either public toilets and urinals, or resort to open defecation on vacant lands, which is a cause of serious health concern. Dependency on Public Convenience Seat and Urinals are very high, on an average each: Public Convenience Seat serves approximately 300 persons and each Urinal serves approximately 200 persons, against prescribed norms of 30 to 50 persons per Public Convenience Seat / Urinal. Solid Waste Management: As per the discussions with the ULB officials, it was indicated that there are no designation Solid Waste Collection Points or Waste Bins provided in Slums. As a result, in most of the slums, the waste is disposed in nearby vacant areas creating unhygienic conditions. Roads: The ULB has provided about 109 km of surfaced roads. The per capita road maintained by the ULB in slums works out to be 0.36 m that is less than the total roads maintained by the ULB on town level. Considering the prescribed standards for per capita road length of 0.25 m for slums below 1000 populations and 0.51 m for slums above 1000 population respectively, indicates a surplus in road demand for Slums. Storm Water Drains: As per discussions with ULB officials, it was indicated that Slums in Madurai city are not provided with pucca Storm water drains. Although, there are kutcha drains, which were often noticed to damaged or clogged due to solid waste dumping. Hence, there is a demand for new formation of drains along existing roads and new roads. Street Lights: The ULB has provided approximately 990 numbers of streetlights in slums. Overall, the streetlight spacing in Madurai is approximately 28 m, and that in the Slums is noticed to be far higher. It is noticed that several road junctions and street stretches are poorly lit, and some of the slums are devoid of any facilities for Street Lighting. 6.2.3 Key Indicators and Issues
The following are a set of indicators, for which the current situation and the desired values are presented. The desired values can be used as benchmarks by the municipality to check its performance annually/ periodically and set targets for itself to be achieved in the next financial year. This will also aid in preparation of the Annual CDP Progress Reports by the Corporation. The details of performance indicators are furnished in Table 7.2. Table 6.2.1: Performance Indicators for Slums Indicator Current Benchmark Situation Slum population as % to Total Town Population 36% < 10.0 %
94 Indicator Current Benchmark Situation Household size in Slums (Persons per HH) 5.03 Distribution Network Reach (against Road length in 80% > 100.0 % slums) in Slums Slum Population per Public Stand Post/ Hand 119 Persons 75 Persons Pumps Slum Population per Seat of Public Convenience/ 301 Persons 60 Persons ISP Complex Road Length (Per Capita Road Length) 0.36 0.25 to 0.51 6.2.4 Issues Slums in Madurai are densely populated, and are poorly served with infrastructure facilities. Poor water supply and sanitation facilities in the Slums of Madurai are major cause of concern the Slums are inadequately provided with Public convenience Seats, and the existing facilities are in dilapidated conditions. Hence, the slum population resorts to open defecation are majority of the locations. Slums are provided with inadequate waste collection bins, thus resulting in dumping of garbage on road side and in the drains. The survey to identify Below Poverty Line families by the Community Organizers (COs) themselves has not been successful. The Below Poverty Line eligibility criterion declared by the Government is not reasonably established through the survey. This could be one of the main reasons for Madurai having high BPL population. 6.3. Poverty Alleviation and Community Development This section reviews programs that address service delivery to the poor in Madurai. A review of Slum Improvement Programs indicates that by improving basic infrastructure and access to municipal services, there is a significant impact on the quality of life of slum residents. To alleviate the problems of slum dwellers and to reduce urban poverty, a number of programs initiated and has been implemented by the local body with assistance from state and central government. Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board along with ULB has implemented many slum improvement programs till date. Provision of Shelter, provision of service connections, standposts, provision of public toilets, and provision of electricity and provision of employment was reported as major focus areas. Currently, all the recognized slums in the city have been provided with infrastructure improvement under several schemes of TNSCB Scheme covering approximately 30,000 families. Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board (TNSCB) is the supreme authority for its planning, implementation and monitoring. 6.4. Slum Improvement Schemes Major slum improvement programs are being implemented in Madurai viz., National Slum Development Program (NSDP), Swarna Jayanti Shehari Rojgar Yojna (SJSRY), Slum Improvement Schemes under TNUDP loan, and
95 Accelerated Slum Improvement Scheme. Swarna Jayanti Shehari Rojgar Yojna (SJSRY) Swarna Jayanti Shehari Rojgar Yojana (SJSRY) is central and state government sponsored scheme started in Madurai. The main programs in this scheme are: Development of Women and Children in Urban Areas (DWCUA): This scheme is distinguished by the special incentive extended to urban poor women who decide to set up self employment ventures as a group as opposed to individual effort. Groups of poor women shall take up an economic activity suited to their skill, training, aptitude and local conditions. Besides generations of income, their group shall strive to empower the urban poor women by making them independent as also providing a facilitation atmosphere for self employment. Under this program, groups of women devise a project plan. A successful plan will receive a subsidy from the government and a loan from an area bank branch. To be eligible for subsidy under this scheme, the DWCUA group should consist of at least 10 urban poor women. The loan is 45 percent of the project cost (maximum), the subsidy is 50 percent (maximum), and the remaining 5 percent are borne by the group. The maximum project size supported is Rs. 2,50,000. Thrift & Credit Societies: This program brings together 10 20 women from Below Poverty Line families to carry out saving and lending activities. The government gives a lump sum grant to the group after it has been functioning for one full year. The grant is determined at the rate of Rs. 1,000 per member and is to be used as a revolving fund. Urban Skill Training: This component sponsors skill development in a variety of service and manufacturing trades as well as in local skills and local crafts. After being trained, beneficiaries should be able to set up self employment ventures or secure salaried employment with enhanced remuneration. Training institutions such as ITIs/ Polytechnics/ Shramik Vidyapeeths/ Engineering Colleges and other suitable training institution run by Government, private, or voluntary organizations may be utilized and provided support for this purpose (but they must be registered with the concerned government department). Training includes computer skills, beautician skills, car driving, screen printing, doll making, tailoring, TV & radio repair, electrical equipment repair, candle making, detergent and soap making and book binding. Training is limited to an expense of Rs. 2,000 per student, including a Rs. 300 stipend. For trainees successfully completing their courses, the scheme can provide up to Rs. 600 for a toolkit. Some institutes place candidates in jobs. Urban Wage Employment Program (UWEP): This program seeks to provide wage employment to beneficiaries living below the poverty line within the jurisdiction of urban local bodies by utilizing their labor for construction of socially and economically useful public assets. Under this program, there is no restriction on educational qualification. The material labor ratio for works under this program is to be maintained at 60:40. The prevailing minimum wage rate, as notified from time to time for each area, has to be paid to beneficiaries under this program. Urban Self Employment Program (USEP): Under this program, individuals (men
96 or women) devise an income generation project plan and apply for a loan. A successful plan will receive a subsidy from the government and a loan from an area bank branch. The loan is 80 percent of the project cost (maximum), the subsidy is 15 percent (maximum), and the remaining 5 percent are borne by the individual. The maximum project size supported is Rs. 50,000 per individual. Community Structure Component (CSC): This component provides a budget for working with other government agencies and departments to address needs of the eligible population beyond jobs and income. National Slum Development Program (NSDP) Under this program, the central and state government provide 50 percent of the project cost while the local body has to bear the remaining 50 percent. The works are finalised by the decision of the council. They are inspected by the RD. through the Regional Engineer. Special Priority is given to the following: Improvement of Drinking Water Supply System Laying/Relaying of Roads Provision of Street Lights Drainage Facilities Improvement and New Public Conveniences with Water Supply Welfare (education, etc.); and Shelter Upgradation (Individual Water Connections) 6.5. Tenement Scheme TNSCB has taken up construction of blocks for slum dwellers under the Environmental Improvement fund. Under this scheme a fireproof tenement of size 10x10 ft. will be constructed by TNSCB outside the limits of Corporation, with off site infrastructure facilities. Corporation is also involved in various community development activities in slums. The schemes so far implemented by TNSCB at Madurai are indicated in the Table 6.5.1 Table 6.5.1: Slum Improvement Schemes Scheme Beneficiaries Estimated Cost No. of Families Rs. Lakh Slum Clearance Scheme (Tenement scheme) 300 93.14 Slum Improvement Scheme 7,172 187.16 ( Under TNUDP) Cash Loan Scheme 849 59.71 Nehru Rojgar Yojana Scheme 1,257 63.17 Accelerated Slum Improvement Scheme 10,778 107.30 Shelter for shelter less 2,010 185.73 M.H. ASIS 9.76 M.H. HIG 6,915 103.72 Total 29,281 809.69 Source: TNSCB, Madurai.
97
Memorandum
of Agreement
98
99
100 101
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
Slum Wise Details
147
CHECK LIST FOR PRERATION / APPRAISAL OF DPR IN INTEGRATED HOUSING & SLUM DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME (IHSDP)
Slum Name: V.V. Girisalai Location: South Zone- Ward No. 41 Population: 379
1 Name of the State Tamil Nadu 2 Category of State whether special category or general (Special category General States are J&K, Uttaranchal, Himachal Pradesh & North Eastern States including Sikkim) 3 Name of the City Madurai Status Remarks (Yes/No) 4 a) Whether MOA for reforms has been signed with the Ministry of urban Yes development? b) Whether a copy of the signed MOA has been received in the Ministry Yes of Urban Employment & poverty Alleviation or not? c) Whether signed MOA mentions with asterish that two reforms, viz., i) Yes Repeal of Urban Land Ceiling and Regulation Act; and ii) Amendment of Rent Control Laws balancing the interest of landlords and tenants are optional with regard to schemes under IHSDP? 5 Whether the State level Nodal Agency has been designated? Yes 6 Whether the DPR has been forwarded by the designated Nodal Agency? Yes 7 Whether State level Co ordination Committee (SLCC) has been Yes constituted? 8 Whether DPR has been recommended by the SLCC? Yes 9 Whether elected Local Body is in place? Yes 10 Total Urban population of the city (2001) 928,869 11 Total Slum population of the city 303,141 12 Is DPR an integrated housing & infrastructure project? ( If not, proper Yes justification) 13 Has the contribution from the beneficiaries been collected? Yes 14 Has the State share been deposited in a separate account Yes 15 Is the DPR for in situ development Yes 16 Is the DPR for relocation? No 17 In case of relocation, whether all basic amenities have been provided for No in the new site in the DPR? 18 Is the new site in proximity to the original site / work place? 19 In case of in site. Whether provision for basic services has been provided Yes for in the DPR? 20 Housing i) Whether density of population norms has been observed in the DPR Yes with reference to city as per the bye laws? ii) Whether plotted area, setbacks and coverage of plot are as per Yes byelaws? iii) Whether maximum FAR Utilization has been considered in the DPR to Yes ensure efficient use of land? iv) Whether the dwelling unit cost is within the ceiling limit? Yes v) In case the cost is higher, whether the source of funds has been filed No up / indicated? vi) Whether security of tenure / patta has been provided to the Yes beneficiaries, as per guidelines, preferably women? vii) Whether the floor area of dwelling unit is equal or more than 25 sq Yes mtrs? viii) Whether each dwelling unit comprises two rooms, kitchen and a Yes toilet? 21 Infrastructure facilities Whether provisioning for the following has been made in DPR
148
i) Water Supply No. ii) Sewerage No iii) Solid waste disposal No iv) Development of roads/paths/footpaths/pavements Yes v) Storm water drains No vi) Street Lighting Yes 22 Whether environmental impact considerations have been taken into Yes account while preparing the DPR? 23 Community facilities Whether provisioning for the following has been made in DPR i) Community Centre No ii) Community Primary Health care centre No iii) Primary Education Centre No iv) Parks and open spaces No 24 Whether there is provisioning for convergence of the Central and State Government schemes in the following sectors in the DPR i) Health ii) Education iii) Social security including accidental and medical insurance, old age pension , old age homes etc 25 Whether cost of land has been included in the project cost where private No land has been acquired? ( Applicable only to special category stages, viz., J&K Uttaranchal, Himachal Pradesh and north eastern states including Sikkim 26 Whether a separate provisioning for upkeep and maintenance of public Yes assets to be created through this project has been made by the state Government / ULB / Parastatal? ( This provisioning will not be funded under the scheme) 27 Whether the area / beneficiaries covered under DPR had previously No benefited in any Central/ State Government Scheme? ( If so, details thereof ) 28 Whether DPR is a PPP Project? No 29 Is the DPR in accordance with the IHSDP guidelines? If not, indicate Yes deviations and provide justifications 30 Any other information relevant to the DPR
149
SURVEY OF SLUMS IN MADURAI PROFILE OF SLUMS IN V.V.GIRI SALAI MADURAI CORPORATION ------WARD NO. 41 SERIAL NO. : 19 (South) NAME OF SLUM : V.V.Girisalai ------ 1. SLUM BOUNDARIES : EAST : J.R.ROAD WEST : AVANIAPURAM VAIKAL NORTH : AVANIAPURAM VAIKAL SOUTH : JAIHINDPURAM II MAIN ROAD 2. OWNERSHIP OF LAND: MADURAI CORPORATION 3. AGE OF SLUMS (YEARS) : 30 YEARS 4. TYPE OF SLUM : ALL TYPES OF HOUSES 5. NO. OF SHELTER UNITE BY TYPE : THATCHED : 18 ASBESTOS : 67 PUCCA : 5 TINNED : TILED : ALL : √ 6. LEVEL OF COMMON FACILITIES : FACILITY TYPE NOS. PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY TAP 2 HAND PUMP BOREWELL 1 PUBLIC TOILET LATRINE 10 STREET LIGHTS SVL 1 TL 10 SCHOOL PRE – SCHOOL ADULT EDUCN. CENTRE DRINS OPEN 1 ROADS UNCOVERED 0.09 Km OTHER COMMUNITY FACILITY NOON MEAL CENTRE & SCHOOL 1
150
ABSTRACT
Name of Slum: V.V. Giri Salai
Sl. Central State Beneficiari Name of Scheme Total Cost No 50 % 38 % es 12 %
New House Rs.92,000/- 1. 55.20 27.60 20.98 6.62 unit C.C. Road at V.V. Giri 2. 8.90 4.45 4.45 -- Salai (Ward: 41) 3. Street Light 0.48 0.24 0.24 --
TOTAL 64.58 32.29 25.67 6.62
151
MADURAI CORPORATION
V.V.GIRISALAI
V.V. Giri Salai is one of the slum cluster among 208 slums of Madurai City and is located at about 1000 Metre from TPK main road. The population of this slum as per 2001 census is 379 Nos. and approximately 83 Nos. of House hold are there. A detailed survey on present status of slum with respect to nature of housing basic amenities infrastructures and socio economic status has been carried out for proposing on site improvement by the Corporation.
Housing :
In the recent survey it is identified that 5 Nos. of RCC roof 67 Nos. of AC/ Tilled roof and 18 Nos. of Thatched roof are present in the slum. Of which, Tiled/ AC roof are/ are not required New housing and entire Tacked roof is required. New Housing and hence it is proposed to construct 60 Nos. and new housing at the rate of Rs.92000/- net with central, state and beneficiary contribution The list of beneficiaries enclosed in the respective annexure and the land owned by the beneficiaries are free from encroachment.
Water Supply:
At present water supply is being supplied thro’ Pipe system from TB Tank OHT Distribution network, thro 110 mm dia PVC/ Pipe. At present 4 Nos. household having house service connection with 2 Nos. of stand posts. It is proposed to revamped the entire city level distribution network in the separate project. Hence no proposal has been given except Nil Nos. hand pumps/ power pumps to meet the present needs.
Sewerage:
As the Slum pocket is covered already under NRCP of Phase-I/II UGD Scheme/to be covered under separate project for omitted Slums and areas are a separate Project no proposal has been made in this proposal.
152
Roads and Strom Water Drain:
It has 0.09 Kms of CC Road, with 0.09 Kms of Storm Water Drain, the Roads/Drains are in damaged conditions and is require. Hence it is proposed 0.09 Kms road 0.09 Km of Storm Water Drain.
Solid Waste Management:
In this Slum 1.20 MT of MSW is generated and 1.08 MT of MSW is cleared daily with available Mechanism. An integrated Solid Waste Management project at City level is being formulated under JNNURM and hence no proposal has been proposed.
Street Light:
It is having 5 Nos. of Sodium Vapor Light and 6 Nos. of Tube Lights. Now it is proposed 1 Nos. of SVL and 10 Nos. of Tube Lights
Community Centers:
It is having Community Center nearly and hence it is not proposed to construct a Community Center for this Slum.
Maternity Center:
Maternity Center is located nearly and hence it is not proposed Maternity Center.
Social Amenities:
Social Amenities like Pre-school Education, Anganwadi and other Programmes like SJSRY , Marriage loans are available in the Vicinity and hence no of proposal is included in this Slum. Park and Play Fields:
Parks and Play fields are located in nearby areas and also due to non availability land. It is not proposed in this Slum.
153
154
155
156
PROFORMA – 2 2.1 Various Components of Schemes S.No. Description
Please put a tick mark Name of the schemes against schemes selected 1 Provision of shelter including up gradation & construction of new houses. (on site √ improvement) 2 Slum relocation 3 Provision of community toilets/baths 4 Provision of physical amenities Access to safe water supply Sewerage Drainage/ storm water drains Solid waste collection Widening and paving of existing lanes √ Street lights, etc. √ 5 Community Infrastructure like provision of community centers 6 Community Primary Health Care Center Buildings 7 Social Amenities like preschool education Preschool education Nonformal education Adult education Maternity center 8 Project development Framework Public private partnership in housing and infrastructure development Housing supplied by Developer/Contractors 9 Sites and Services schemes
157
PROFORMA – 3 3.1 Slum (Cluster) Level Details Sl. Description No. Details about the scheme to Details to be provided be selected V.V.GIRI SALAI 1. Name of the Selected Schemes Population to be served in the 2. 379 Nos. Selected Scheme Area to be covered in the 3. 2283 Sqm. Selected Scheme Area of Slum Clusters 4. 2283 Sq.m. (Selected) 5. Target Population SC / ST % OBC % General % 303 80 68 18 8 2 6. BENEFICIARIES Identification Contribution Beneficiaries Identification Identified Ration Card Available Name in the voter list (Electoral Available Card) BPL Card Available Note: Please Submit the list of beneficiaries along with the identification proof and beneficiaries contribution towards the scheme 7. SOCIAL SECURITY List out all the facilities envisaged for widows, single Water supply, Sewerage, Road and Shelters women and disabled, old age List out the activities done by the NGOs and the CBOs in the slum cluster 8. LINKAGES Location of the Scheme in the town map (please locate the slum cluster on a map and Enclosed submit it with the report) showing the following 9. Accessibility in respect to In Km. Major Roads 0.50 km Water Supply 0.20 km Electric Sub Station 0.20 km Main Sewer Line 0.20 km Main Drainage Lines 0.20 km Tele Communication Network 0.20 km Local Bus Stops (for city 1.00 km transportation) Primary Health Centres / 0.8 km
158
Sl. Description No. Maternity Centers Facilities for pre school Education Non – Formal Education Primary Schools 0.80 Km Community Centers Facilities for Audit Education Work Centers 0.50 Town Centers 2 Km Railway Station 1.80 Km Bus Stand (ISBT) 1.50 Km 10. SOCIO – ECONOMIC DETAILS BPL Population and its a. Male % Female % percentage 157 50.48 154 49.52 b. Others and its percentage Male % Female % 34 50 34 50 11. HOUSEHOLD INCOME a. Below Average Income Male % Female % 6000 70 4,000 30 b. Above Average Income Male % Female % 6,000 70 4,000 30 12. EDUCATION a. Literate Male % Female % 109 29 73 20 b. Illiterate Male % Female % 4 2.5 5 3 c. Matriculation and above Male % Female % 3 2 3 2 13. SERVICE AVAILBLE Location of the slum cluster with respect to cities network water supply, sewerage, drainage, Enclosed solid waste disposal, major roads and Transport facilities ACCESSIBILITY TO SAFE Total Percentage WATER a. Individual Connection Individual Taps Hand Pumps b. Public Taps 2 50 % c. Hand Pumps (Public) 1 55 % d. Others with no accessibility p.p 14. SEWERAGE CONNECTION No. of Households covered 60 80 %
159
Sl. Description No. 15. SEPTIC TANK Total Percentage No. of Households covered COMMUNITY TOILETS / 16. Total Percentage BATHS No. of Households covered 300 78 17. OPEN DEFECTION Total Percentage No. of Households covered 18. ELECTRIC CONNECTION Total Percentage No. of Households having 379 100 electric connection 19. STREET LIGHT Total Percentage No. of Streets covered 1 88 20. EXISTING STREETS Kachha (km) -- Pacca (km) B.T. 300m 21. SOLID WASTE Total Waste generated in the a. 1.20 MT clustor Total Waste collected in the b. 1.08 MT clustor Submit layout of the slum pocket with photographs and with all land details Enclosed STAKEHOLDERS 22. PERCEPTION Identify the all the Stakeholder a. Identified - List Enclosed of the Scheme Stakeholder view for up gradation of the existing site or On site upgradation and construction of new b. relocation of the slum pocket at houses. an appropriate site within the municipal / urban area boundary Note: Details out the whole process and attach it with the report and give reasons for selection for up gradation / relocation of the slum pocket.
Workshop of the stakeholder should be conducted to assess their views.
160
3.2 FRAMEWORK FOR SCHEMES 3.2.1. Provision of Shelter Including up gradation & Construction of New Houses (on site improvement)
3.2.1.1. HOUSEHOLD DETAILS
Sl. No. Description Details No. of Household to be 1. 60 covered 2. Average household area 25.40Sqm 3.2.1.2. LAND REQUIREMENTS
Sl. No. Description Details LAND DETAILS UNIT IN HECTARES
Total area of land to be used Existing Proposed Total 1. in the Project 1524 1524
Details about the ownership of Government Private Others 2. the Land √ Note: Land acquisition cost will not be financed except for the acquisition of the private land for schemes / projects in the North Eastern States and hilly states, viz Himachal Pradesh, Uttaranchal and Jammu and Kashmir. Existing and proposed layout of the slum cluster should be submitted.
161
3.2.1.3. CEILING COST OF THE DWELLING UNIT Sl. Dwelling Unit Details Dwelling Unit Cost No. New Improvement Total Construction 1. * Cost per dwelling Unit 92,000 92,000 2. Government Contribution 46,000 46,000 3. Beneficiaries Contribution 34,960 34,960 Any other Contribution 4. 11,040 11,040 from other sources TOTAL 92,000 92,000 What is the percentage contribution of 5. 12 % 12 % beneficiaries of total contribution Total number of dwelling 6. 60 55,20,000 unit to be constructed Note : 1) Details of the Construction based on the estimates should be submitted. 2) Ceiling cost of the dwelling unit will be @ of Rs. 92,000 per unit includes internal w/s, sanitation, electricity etc. for cities other than those covered under the Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission (JnNURM). 3) For Special category / hilly states and difficult far flung areas, 12.5 % additionally will be permissible over and above the prescribed ceiling cost per dwelling unit. 4) A minimum of 12% beneficiaries contributions should be stipulated, which in the case of SC / ST/ OBC/ PH and other weaker section shall be 10%
3.2.1.4. Details of the Dwelling Unit Sl. Description No. Dwelling Unit Details ------Proposed area of the 1. 25.40 Sq.m. dwelling unit Number of rooms 2. proposed to be made per Two Rooms dwelling unit Density of proposed 3. 90 % houses Ground coverage of 4. 95 % proposed housing complex Area under Roads / green 5. 3% area Note 1) Please attach the detailed housing plans. 2) Minimum floor area of the dwelling unit should not be less than 25 Sq.mtrs. Area and preferably two room accommodation plus kitchen and toilet should be constructed. 3) Housing should be in configuration of G+2 / G+3 (Ground + 2 Floors or Ground + 3 Floors) 4) Local Municipal Bye laws should be followed and plans should be approved by the concerned authority.
162
3.2.1.5 Type of Material to be Used for Houses
Sl. Description Details No. Type of Material used in housing 1. construction for low cost housing Brick, Steel, Sand, Stone and Cement (provide details) Local material that may be used in 2. " housing (provide details)
3.2.1.5 Tenure Details
Sl. Description Details No. Land tenure ship should be secured 1. Patta by giving patta etc. – elaborate Details of the beneficiaries 2. contribution for land / DUs ------ownership Area of the plot / DUs to be allotted 3. by the Government to the beneficiaries Details of the conditions to be 4. imposed on beneficiaries at the time ------of allotment Male 5. Details of legal heir of the property Female Joint Name (Special Cases Only) Nil Nil Nil Note: Title of the land should be preferably in the name of the name of the wife and alternatively jointly in the names of husband and wife. In exceptional cases, title in the name of male beneficiary may be permitted.
163
4. PROVISIONS OF COMMUNITY TOILETS/BATHS (Under this schemes construction and development of toilets complexes including bathing facilities for men and women will be considered.) Note: This scheme is only applicable in that slum up gradation sites where the houses are not having individual toilets. 4.1 PROVISIONS OF COMMUNITY TOILETS
S.No. Community involvement Yes No 1 Tendering process a Contractor b Department work 2 Consultation with the community in location of the toilets 3 Consultation with the community consultation in designing 4 Consultation with the community in construction of the toilet 5 Consultation with the community in maintenance of the toilets 6 Social mobilization of the community ensured 7 Beneficiaries participation to be ensured 8 Is there any provision of design of different toilets for women and child 9 What percentage of population is covered with 80% sewerage system 10 What percentage of population is covered with septic tank 11 What is the provision for remaining population 12 Number of families served with one community toilet 4.2 POPULATION COVERED BY EXISTING AND PROPOSED TOILET COMPLEXES UNDER VARIOUS PROGRAMMES S.No. Toilet Complexes Population % covered Population covered by existing toilet 1 complexes 2 Population to be covered by the toilets proposed under the scheme 3 Population to be covered by toilet complexes proposed under other projects 4 Number of households covered with one community toilets 5 Population covered by private and individual toilets 6 Others Total
164
4.3 COST OF THE PROJECT S.No. DETAILS NUMBER COST 1 No. of community toilets to be constructed 2 Cost of one such community toilets 3 Total cost of all community toilets 5. PROVISION OF PHYSICAL AMENITIES (Under this scheme access to safe water supply, sewerage, storm water drains, solid waste collection, widening and paving of internal roads and street lights will be considered) 5.1 ACCESS TO SAFE WATER S.NO DESCRIPTION DETAILS 1 Total supply of water per day 1,00,000 lpcd 2 Supply from various sources Population Percentage served 150 50 % Municipal taps 2 50% Hand pumps -- -- Other sources P.P. 1 50% 3 Per capita supply 70 Liters 4 Duration of Supply (hrs) 2 Hours 5 Population covered (%) 52.50 % 6 Project Cost A Separate Project for revamping entire city level distribution network. Hence no proposal is proposed. 7 Present cost of water supply (user charges) Rs. 412/- per year
8 Revenue generation for sustainable W/S ---
9 Fund required and cost sharing mechanism 50 % Govt. of India 50 % State Govt. 10 Scheme for existing/proposed water recycling and harvesting Note: Detail cost estimate to be submitted based on Schedule of Rates
5.2 SEWERAGE
S.NO DESCRIPTION DETAILS 1 Water supplied klt/day 27 klt 2 Sewer Generated 80% of the w/s 22 klt
3 Proposed No. of sewer connections --- Individual 60 community --- 4 Proposed Length of sewer (km’s) 100 M Septic tanks ----
165
1 Proposed no of septic tank at the household ---- level 2 Proposed number of Community septic tanks ---- Note: Detail cost estimate to be submitted based on Schedule of ---- Rates
5.3 STROM WATER DRAINS S.NO DESCRIPTION DETAILS Existing Proposed Length (km’s) 0.40 ---
Length of road (km’s) 0.40 ---
Coverage of system*(%) 80% ---
Note: Detail cost estimate to be submitted based on Schedule of Rates
5.4 SOLID WASTE
S.NO DESCRIPTION DETAILS 1 Total Waste Generated 1.20 MT 2 Total Waste Collected 1.08 MT 3 Management of waste A Separate Project for to entire city is prepare under JNNURM. Note: Detail cost estimate to be submitted based on Schedule of Rates 5.5 WASTE COLLECTION
S.No TYPES OF WASTE EXISTING PROPOSED COLLECTION POINTS
1 Waste Depots (dhalao) 2 Dustbins 3 R.C. container 4 Total Note: Detail cost estimate to be submitted based on Schedule of Rates
166
5.6 WIDENING AND PAVING OF INTERNAL ROADS S.No DESCRIPTION EXISTING PROPOSED 1 Length of roads 89 M B.T. ROAD C.C.ROAD 2 Kachha 3 Pacca Note: Detail cost estimate to be submitted based on Schedule of Rates 5.7 STREET LIGHTS S.No DESCRIPTION EXISTING PROPOSED 1 Street Lights SVL- 5 SVL- 1 (one per 30 mts of road length) TL - 6 TL-10 Note: Detail cost estimate to be submitted based on Schedule of Rates Rs. 0.48 Lakhs
6. COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURES LIKE PROVISION OF COMMUNITY CENTERS
S.No COMMUNITY CENTRE DETAILS IN SQ MTS EXISTING PROPOSED 1 Area exiting/proposed for the community center 2 Number of rooms existing/ proposed in the community center 3 Size of the room existing /proposed in the community center 4 Size of toilets existing/proposed in the community center Note: Detail cost estimate to be submitted along with the detailed plan of building to be constructed or upgraded
167
6.1 COMMUNITY PRIMARY HEALTH CARE CENTRE BUILDINGS/ COMMUNITY HALL S. BUILDING DETAILS EXISTING PROPOSED No Number Populati Number Populatio on served n served 1 Number of Primary Health Centre/ Facility available 2 Number of rooms for the primary health centre 3 Toilets facilities available
4 Population served by the community centers/ hall Note: Location of the Health centers in the overall layout plan to be shown Plan of the existing /proposed health centre Detail cost estimate to be submitted along with the detailed plan of building to be constructed or upgraded 6.2 MATERNITY CENTRE S.No Building Detail EXISTING PROPOSED Populati Populatio Number on Number n served served 1 Area of the maternity centre (Sq.mts)
2 Number of rooms in the maternity centre
3 Size of the room in the maternity centre 4 Number of toilets in the maternity centre Note: Location of the Maternity centers in the overall layout plan to be shown Plan of the existing /proposed health centre Detail cost estimate to be submitted along with the detailed plan of building to be constructed or upgraded 7. SOCIAL AMENITIES
7.1 PRESCHOOL EDUCATION S.No DESCRIPTION EXISTING PROPOSED
Number Populati Number Populatio on n served served 1 Facilities for preschool education 2 Population served
168
Note: Detail cost estimate to be submitted based on Schedule of Rates 7.2 NONFORMAL EDUCATION S.No DESCRIPTION EXISTING PROPOSED
Number Populati Number Populatio on n served served 1 Facilities for nonformal education 2 Population served Note: Detail cost estimate to be submitted based on Schedule of Rates 7.3 ADULT EDUCATION S.No DESCRIPTION EXISTING PROPOSED
Number Population Number Population served served
1 Facilities for adult education 2 Population served Note: Detail cost estimate to be submitted based on Schedule of Rates 7.4 AGANWADI/ CRECHES
S.No DESCRIPTION EXISTING PROPOSED
Number Populati Number Populatio on n served served 1 Facilities for aganwadi/creches 1 350 2 Population served Note: Detail cost estimate to be submitted based on Schedule of Rates 7.5 PARKS AND PLAYGROUND S.No DESCRIPTION EXISTING PROPOSED
Number Populati Number Populatio on n served served 1 Park and playground in the area 2 Population served Note: Detail cost estimate to be submitted based on Schedule of Rates
169
7.6 LIVELIHOOD SUPPORT PROGRAMMES
S.No DESCRIPTION EXISTING PROPOSED
Number Populati Number Populatio on n served served
1 Saving and credit programmes 2 Training programmes 3 Income generation programmes through other means Note: Detail out all the NGOs/CBOs scheme being done in the livelihood support programmes 8. PROJECT DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 8.1 Public private partnership in housing and infrastructure development S.No Public Private Partnership Mechanism 1 Identification of the need for public private partnership 2 Any information for initiating the partnership 3 Define the objective of the particular project and the necessity of partnership 4 Information on the particular project 5 Identification Constraints in the partnership and its rectifications 6 Defining Parameters for the particular project 7 What kind of Financing Mechanism is being worked out in the project 8 How will the cost be recovered or sustained in the project 9 What kind of tendering and Procurement mechanism is being worked out 10 Explain the Monitoring & Evaluation mechanism in the project Note: Elaborate the steps in the public private partnership model to be implemented at the slum cluster level
170
9. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SCHEME
INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK FOR PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK FOR PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION 1 Is the organization employing external agency for project support consultant ( provide details) 2 Name of the local agencies for project Madurai Corporation implementation (provide details) 3 Tendering committee to be involved in the project Council (provide details) 10. MANAGEMENT OF THE PROJECT MANAGEMENT OF THE PROJECT 1 CEO/ Chief of the local bodies Commissioner
2 Project Director Commissioner
3 Project ImplementationHeaded by EE/AE ( Superintending Engineer institutional flow chart to be developed) E.E., A.E.E., & A.E., / J.E., 11. RESOURCE MOBILIZATION AND BUDGETARY ALLOCATION SOURCES OF FINANCES RESOURCE MOBILIZATION AND BUDGETARY ALLOCATION
1 What is the ULBs own resources contribution in the project envisaged 2 State Government contribution in the project 50%
3 Beneficiaries Contribution in the project
4 Central Government agencies contribution in the 50% project 5 ESCROW account to be maintained or any other mechanism for transparency and better management and utilization of funds 6 What kind of State Guarantee mechanism to be developed 7 Any Other
Note: Detail out all the resource mobilization and budgetary allocation in the project
171
12. MONITORING MECHANISM Monitoring Mechanism
Internal mechanism 1 Utilization of the fund a model to be developed Corporation
2 Project completion cycle to be based on Corporation PERT/CPM 3 Progress reporting developed for the project Corporation
External mechanism CMA 1 What are the various step taken for evaluation by ------the monitoring agency 2 13. REVIEWING DEVELOPMENT ONES IN TWO TO THREE YEARS TO ACCOMMODATE/ ADJUST THE ONGOING CHANGES IN THE SOCIETY/ CITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES Reviewing development 1 Reviewing committee and its composition (submit the composition that has bee envisaged in the project) 2 Feedback to be sent to the management / State Government ( indicate the mechanism developed by the state to give feedback about the project) 3 Restructuring implementation programme on basis of feedback (indicate the ways in which the programme may be restructured after getting the feedback) 14. REFORMS S.No PROJECT REFORMS 1 What steps have been taken for improvement in Under JNNURM urban governance? 2 What mandatory reforms have been taken up for Under JNNURM smooth functioning of the project. 3 What optional reforms have been taken up for smooth Under JNNURM functioning of the project? 4 What sate level reforms have been taken up for Under JNNURM smooth functioning of the project? 5 Have the agency gone into the agreement for Memorandum of Agreement (MoA) with the Under JNNURM Government of India committing to implement the reform programme. Note: The States/ULBs need to choose at least two Optional Reforms each year for implementation. The details of reforms which have been implemented and/or proposed to be taken up should be included in the detailed project reports.
172
15. TOTAL PROJECT COST
S.No PROJECT COST
1 What is the total cost of the project selected 64.58 a 1st Project selected 8.90 b 2nd Project selected 55.20 c 3rd Project selected 0.48 d 4th Project selected Total Cost 64.58 16. PROJECT CONTRIBUTIONS
S.No PROJECT CONTRIBUTION
1 Central 32.29 2 State 25.67 3 ULBs 4 Others 6.62 Total 64.58
173
DETAILED ESTIMATE SHEET
Measurement in Metre Total Quantity of Sl. Details of Work Nos. Cash No. Contents L B D Description of Work 1. Earth work excavation in all kinds of soils except hard rock requiring blasting inclusive of shoring strutting and bailing out water wherever necessary etc. VV Giri Salai Culvert 1x1 8.00 1.50 1.00 12.00 For UGD 1x1 89.00 1.00 0.75 66.75 78.75 (or) 80m3 2) Supplying and filling in foundation and basement with river sand in layers of 15cm thick well rammed and consolidated inclusive watering complying with standard specification etc. For UGD cutting portion 1x1 89.00 1.00 0.40 35.60 For Culvert 1x1 8.00 1.50 0.10 1.20 For basement filling 1x1 89.00 8.50 0.10 75.65 112.45 (or) 120m3 3) Cement concrete 1:5:10 using 40mm gauge hard broken granite jelly for foundation including watering and consolidation and dewatering for foundation wherever necessary etc. For UGD Cutting Portion 1x1 89.00 1.00 0.15 13.35 For Culvert 1x1 8.00 1.50 0.15 1.80 For Road 1x1 89.00 8.50 0.10 75.65 90.80 (or) 100m3
174
Measurement in Metre Total Quantity of Sl. Details of Work Nos. Cash No. Contents L B D Description of Work 4. Supplying and erecting shuttering with necessary supports for plinth beam with all cross bracings etc. For Drain Side Wall 1x3 89.00 0.45 120.15 For Culvert Body Wall 2x2 8.00 0.75 24.00 144.15 (or) 150m2 5. Cement concrete 1:3:6 using 20mm gauge hard broken granite chips machine broken including watering and consolidation etc. For Drain Round side wall 1x1 89.00 0.30 0.45 12.01 House Side Wall 1x1 89.00 0.23 0.45 9.21 For Culvert Body Wall 1x1 8.00 0.45+0.3 0.75 2.25 2 23.47 (or) 30.00 m3 6) Supplying and erecting centering for sides and soffits supports and strutting for plain surface such as RCC slab rectangular beams, Tee or Ell beams, lintels, bed blocks, staircase and landing slab landing beams, beam canopy etc. complete in all floors of any height (The retrieved materials should be taken back by the contractor) The payment for centering shall be given after the concrete in laid (Bottom only). For Culvert slab bottom 1x1 8.00 0.60 4.80 ,, alround 1x1 18.40 0.20 3.68 8.48 (or) 10
175
m2 Measurement in Metre Total Quantity of Sl. Details of Work Nos. Cash No. Contents L B D Description of Work 7. Supplying fabricating and 2x150 300 Kg. 300 Kgs. placing in position of MS Kg./m3 grills for reinforcement the rate shall include cost of steel for all works. The rate to include cost of binding wire also. 8. RCC 1:2:4 using 20mm gauge hard broken granite chips for RCC concrete. For Culvert Slab 1x1 8.00 1.20 0.20 1.92 (or) 2 m3 9. Plastering with CM 1:3 (One cement, three sand) 20mm thick. For Culvert drain portion 1x1 8.00 0.60 4.80 (or) 5.00 m2 10. Cement Concrete 1:1½:3 (One cement one and half sand three aggregates) using 20mm gauge hard broken granite chips (Machine broken) including watering and consolidation etc. For UGD Cutting Portion 1x1 89.00 1.00 0.20 17.80 For Road 1x1 89.00 8.50 0.20 151.30 11. Supplying and fixing of Tar 1x75 1.20 0.60 54.00 (or) Sheet for expansion joint 60.00 m2 12. Provision for Raining L.S. manhole covering with frame 13. P.S. Charges 2.50% 2.50% 2.50% 14. Unforeseen works L.S.
176
ABSTRACT OF ESTIMATE
Rate Amount Qty. Description of Works Per Remarks Rs. P. Rs. P. 80.00 Earth work excavation in all m3 kinds of soils except hard rock requiring blasting inclusive of shoring strutting and bailing out water wherever necessary etc. 444 30 10m3 3555 00 120.00 Supplying and filling in m3 foundation and basement with river sand in layers of 15cm thick well rammed and consolidated inclusive watering complying with standard specification etc. 386 70 1m3 46404 00 100.00 Cement concrete 1:5:10 using m3 40mm gauge hard broken granite jelly for foundation including watering and consolidation and dewatering for foundation wherever necessary etc. 1505 70 1m3 150570 00 150.00 Supplying and erecting m2 shuttering with necessary supports for plinth beam with all cross bracings etc. 1778 00 10m2 26670 00 30.00 Cement concrete 1:3:6 using m3 20mm gauge hard broken granite chips machine broken including watering and consolidation etc. 2009 60 1m3 60288 00 10.00 Supplying and erecting m2 centering for sides and soffits supports and strutting for plain surface such as RCC slab rectangular beams, Tee or Ell beams, lintels, bed blocks, staircase and landing slab landing beams, beam canopy etc. complete in all floors of any height (The retrieved materials should be taken back by the contractor) The payment for centering shall be given after the concrete in laid (Bottom only). 2164 00 10m2 2164 00
177
Rate Amount Qty. Description of Works Per Remarks Rs. P. Rs. P. 300 Kg. Supplying fabricating and placing in position of MS grills for reinforcement the rate shall include cost of steel for all works. The rate to include cost of binding wire also. 33 35 Kg. 10005 00 2.00 m3 RCC 1:2:4 using 20mm gauge hard broken granite chips for RCC concrete. 2663 70 1m3 5327 00 5.00 m2 Plastering with CM 1:3 (One cement, three sand) 20mm thick. 1205 00 10m2 603 00 180.00 Cement Concrete 1:1½:3 m3 (One cement one and half sand three aggregates) using 20mm gauge hard broken granite chips (Machine broken) including watering and consolidation etc. 3073 00 1m3 553140 00 60.00 Supplying and fixing of Tar m2 Sheet for expansion joint 260 00 1m2 15600 00 L.S. Provision for Raining manhole covering with frame 9000 00 L.S. P.S. Charges 5000 00 L.S. Unforeseen works 1674 00
Total 890000 00
(Rupees Eight Lakhs ninety thousand only)
Station : Madurai Officer Incharge : M.P. Manoharan Dated : Designation : A.E Technically Sanction for Rs.______Administrative Sanction accorded______and registered as C.E’s No.______Ordinary for Rs.______Capital
Corporation Engineer, Commissioner Corporation of Madurai Corporation of Madurai.
178
Madurai Corporation Detailed Estimate Name of Work : Construction of Dwelling unit Sl. Description of work No L B D Contents Total No 1 Earthwork excavation in all soil for foundation with initial lead and lift in all soils and sub soils to the required depth as directed by the departmental officers etc complete as per standard specifications. Wall all round 1x1 19.58 0.90 1.00 17.62 Room cross portion 1x1 4.43 0.90 1.00 3.98 Portion WC Bath 0.40 22.00 22 m3
2 Supply and filling river sand including cost of all materials and and all labour charges etc., complete complying with standard specification etc., Wall all round 1x1 19.58 0.90 0.10 1.76 Room cross portion 1x1 4.43 0.90 0.10 0.40 2.16 2 m3
3 Cement concrete with hard boken grnite stone jelly using 40mm gauge in cement concrete 1:5:10 (One cement five sand and ten aggregate) for foundation includidng cost and conveyance of all materials and all other incidental charges etc., complete complying with standard specifications. Wall all round 1x1 19.58 0.75 0.15 2.64 Room cross portion 1x1 4.43 0.75 0.15 0.59 Flooring 1x2 2.45 2.45 0.10 1.20 1x2 2.45 1.53 0.10 0.75 0.82 6.00 6 m3 4 Random rubble masonry in cement mortar 1 : 5 (One cement and five sand) for foundation and basement using new stones including simultaneous pointing of the exposed surface and all incidental charges such as baling out water, scaffolding curing, finishing etc., complete complying with standard specification
Wall all round 1x1 19.58 0.45 0.50 10.13 Room cross portion 1x1 4.43 0.45 1.15 2.29 0.58 13.00 13 m3
5 Brick work in cement mortar 1 : 5 ( one cement and five sand ) using chamber bricks of size 8 3/4 " x 4 1/4 " 2 3/4 " for the following items including curing etc complete complying with standard specificatin.
Wall all round 1x1 19.58 0.23 2.10 9.45
179
Room Portion 1x1 3.50 0.12 2.10 1.06 WC & Bath 1x1 2.45 0.12 2.10 0.62 (P) Door 1x2 0.90 0.23 2.10 0.87 (-) 1x2 0.70 0.23 2.10 0.68 (-) Window 1x1 0.90 0.23 0.90 0.19 (-) 1x4 1.20 0.23 1.20 1.32 (-) Ventilators 1x2 0.60 0.23 0.90 0.24 (-) All round 1x1 19.58 0.23 0.75 3.38 Portion room 1x1 4.20 0.12 0.75 0.37 WC & Bath 1x1 2.45 0.12 0.75 0.21 0.44 10 m3 10 m3
6 Providing centring shuttering to all RCC works in all materirals and all labour charges etc.. complete complying with standard specification.
Lintel 1x6 1.20 0.00 0.00 1.44 Roof 1x1 20.50 0.00 0.00 2.05 1x1 5.13 4.20 0.00 20.58 4.07 (-) 20.00 20 m2
7 Supplying and fabricating of Steel Including cost all works inclusive of 1x1 4 m3 x70 280.00 cost of Steel ( the rate included cost of binding wire also ) including kg cost of all materials and all labour charges etc.. completed complying with standard specification.
280.00 280 kg 8 Reinforced cement concrete 1:2:4 (One cement two sand four aggregate ) for all RCC works using 20 %mm gauge hard broken stone jelly excluding cost of reinforcement grill in position shuttering and centring but including laying curinglaying curing etc., complete complying with standard Lintel 1x1 19.58 0.45 0.08 0.66 Roof 1x1 19.58 0.23 0.15 0.68 1x1 5.59 4.66 0.10 2.60 0.06 4.00 4 m3
9 Supplying and fabricating and placing in position MS or RTS grill for reimbursement of all works inclusive of cost of steel ( the rate included cost of binding wire also) including cost of all materials and all labour charges etc complete complying with standard specification. Door 1x2 0.90 2.10 0.00 3.78 Door 1x2 0.75 2.10 0.00 3.15 Window 1x1 0.90 0.90 0.00 0.81
180
Window 1x4 1.20 1.20 0.00 5.76 Ventilator 1x2 0.60 0.90 0.00 1.08 0.42 15.00 100 kg
10 Plastering with cement mortar 1:4 (one cement four sand) 20 mm thick including finishing the surface cost and conveyance of all materials mixing curing and all other incidental charges etc., complete complying with standard specification. All round out side 1x1 20.50 -- 3.85 78.92 Door 2x2 0.90 -- 2.10 7.56 (-) Window 1x2 0.90 -- 0.90 1.62 (-) Window 2x4 1.20 -- 1.20 11.52 (-)
Inner side Kitchen room 1x1 7.96 -- 3.00 23.88 Room 1x2 9.80 -- 3.00 58.80 Open 1x2 0.70 -- 3.00 4.20 (-) WC 1x2 5.06 -- 3.00 30.36 Bath 1x1 1.53 -- 3.00 4.59 Ventilator 1x3 0.60 -- 0.90 1.62 (-) 3.99 120.00 120 m2
11 White washing Plastering inner side are 1x1 ------40.00 40 m2
12 Colour washing two coats and plastering outside area 1x1 ------80.00 80 m2
13 Contigences Other Items including water closet Leeach bit - LS -
181
182
MADURAI CORPORATION ABSTRACT Name of Work : Construction of dewelling Unit S.No Qty Description of Items Rate Per Amount 1 22 m3 Earthwork excavation in all soil for foundation with initial 44.30 m3 975.00 lead and lift in all soils and sub soils to the required depth as directed by the departmental officers etc complete as per standard specifications. 2 2 m3 Supply and filling river sand including cost of all materials and 386.70 m3 773.00 and all labour charges etc., complete complying with standard specification etc., 3 6 m3 Cement concrete with hard boken grnite stone jelly 1505.70 m3 9034.00 using 40mm gauge in cement concrete 1:5:10 (One cement five sand and ten aggregate) for foundation includidng cost and conveyance of all materials and all other incidental charges etc., complete complying with standard specifications. 4 13 m3 Random rubble masonry in cement mortar 1 : 5 (One 1349.80 m3 17547.40 cement and five sand) for foundation and basement using new stones including simultaneous pointing of the exposed surface and all incidental charges such as baling out water, scaffolding curing, finishing etc., complete complying with standard specification
5 10 m3 Brick work in cement mortar 1 : 5 ( one cement and five sand 2149.10 m3 21491.00 ) using chamber bricks of size 8 3/4 " x 4 1/4 " 2 3/4 " for the following items including curing etc complete complying with standard specificatin. 6 20 m2 Providing centring shuttering to all RCC works in all materirals 216.40 m2 4328.00 and all labour charges etc.. complete complying with standard specification. 7 280 kg Supplying and fabricating of Steel Including cost all works 33.75 kg 9338.00 inclusive of cost of Steel ( the rate included cost of binding wire also ) including cost of all materials and all labour charges etc.. completed complying with standard specification.
8 4 m3 Reinforced cement concrete 1:2:4 2684.40 m3 10738.00 (One cement two sand four aggregate ) for all RCC works using 20 %mm gauge hard broken stone jelly excluding cost of reinforcement grill in position shuttering and centring but including laying curinglaying curing etc., complete complying with standard 9 100 kg Supplying and fixing of steel door and window including cost of 37.00 kg 3700.00 steel fabrication and fixing charges etc., complete 10 120 m2 Plastering with cement mortar 1:5 (one cement 54.70 m2 6564.00 five sand) 20 mm thick including finishing the
183
surface cost and conveyance of all materials mixing curing and all other incidental charges etc., complete complying with standard specification. 11 40 m2 White washing two coat using best shell lime including cost best shell lime and labour charges etc., complete 6.04 m2 242.00 12 80 m2 Colour washing two coats using best shell lime including cost of all materials and labour charges etc., complete 9.10 m2 718.00 13 - LS - Provision for Electrification Water Closet & RWH Structure 6551.60 TOTAL 92000.00 (Rupees Ninety Two Thousand only)
184
185
CHECK LIST FOR PRERATION / APPRAISAL OF DPR IN INTEGRATED HOUSING & SLUM DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME (IHSDP)
Slum Name: Power House Road Location: South Zone- Ward No. 40 Population: 1150
1 Name of the State Tamil Nadu 2 Category of State whether special category or general (Special category General States are J&K, Uttaranchal, Himachal Pradesh & North Eastern States including Sikkim) 3 Name of the City Madurai Status Remarks (Yes/No) 4 a) Whether MOA for reforms has been signed with the Ministry of urban Yes development? b) Whether a copy of the signed MOA has been received in the Ministry Yes of Urban Employment & poverty Alleviation or not? c) Whether signed MOA mentions with asterish that two reforms, viz., i) Yes Repeal of Urban Land Ceiling and Regulation Act; and ii) Amendment of Rent Control Laws balancing the interest of landlords and tenants are optional with regard to schemes under IHSDP? 5 Whether the State level Nodal Agency has been designated? Yes 6 Whether the DPR has been forwarded by the designated Nodal Agency? Yes 7 Whether State level Co ordination Committee (SLCC) has been Yes constituted? 8 Whether DPR has been recommended by the SLCC? Yes 9 Whether elected Local Body is in place? Yes 10 Total Urban population of the city (2001) 928,869 11 Total Slum population of the city 303,141 12 Is DPR an integrated housing & infrastructure project? ( If not, proper Yes justification) 13 Has the contribution from the beneficiaries been collected? Yes 14 Has the State share been deposited in a separate account Yes 15 Is the DPR for in situ development Yes 16 Is the DPR for relocation? No 17 In case of relocation, whether all basic amenities have been provided for No in the new site in the DPR? 18 Is the new site in proximity to the original site / work place? 19 In case of in site. Whether provision for basic services has been provided Yes for in the DPR? 20 Housing i) Whether density of population norms has been observed in the DPR Yes with reference to city as per the bye laws? ii) Whether plotted area, setbacks and coverage of plot are as per Yes byelaws? iii) Whether maximum FAR Utilization has been considered in the DPR to Yes ensure efficient use of land? iv) Whether the dwelling unit cost is within the ceiling limit? Yes v) In case the cost is higher, whether the source of funds has been filed No up / indicated? vi) Whether security of tenure / patta has been provided to the Yes beneficiaries, as per guidelines, preferably women? vii) Whether the floor area of dwelling unit is equal or more than 25 sq Yes mtrs? viii) Whether each dwelling unit comprises two rooms, kitchen and a Yes toilet? 21 Infrastructure facilities Whether provisioning for the following has been made in DPR
186
i) Water Supply No. ii) Sewerage No iii) Solid waste disposal No iv) Development of roads/paths/footpaths/pavements No v) Storm water drains Yes vi) Street Lighting Yes 22 Whether environmental impact considerations have been taken into Yes account while preparing the DPR? 23 Community facilities Whether provisioning for the following has been made in DPR i) Community Centre No ii) Community Primary Health care centre No iii) Primary Education Centre No iv) Parks and open spaces No 24 Whether there is provisioning for convergence of the Central and State Government schemes in the following sectors in the DPR i) Health ii) Education iii) Social security including accidental and medical insurance, old age pension , old age homes etc 25 Whether cost of land has been included in the project cost where private No land has been acquired? ( Applicable only to special category stages, viz., J&K Uttaranchal, Himachal Pradesh and north eastern states including Sikkim 26 Whether a separate provisioning for upkeep and maintenance of public Yes assets to be created through this project has been made by the state Government / ULB / Parastatal? ( This provisioning will not be funded under the scheme) 27 Whether the area / beneficiaries covered under DPR had previously No benefited in any Central/ State Government Scheme? ( If so, details thereof ) 28 Whether DPR is a PPP Project? No 29 Is the DPR in accordance with the IHSDP guidelines? If not, indicate Yes deviations and provide justifications 30 Any other information relevant to the DPR
187
SURVEY OF SLUMS IN MADURAI PROFILE OF SLUMS IN POWER HOUSE ROAD MADURAI CORPORATION ------WARD NO. 40 SERIAL NO. : (South) NAME OF SLUM : Power House Road ------
1. SLUM BOUNDARIES : EAST : KIRUTHUMAL CHANNEL WEST : SUBRAMANIAPURAM NORTH : SOUTH VELI STREET SOUTH : RAILWAY CROSSING 2. OWNERSHIP OF LAND: MADURAI CORPORATION 3. AGE OF SLUMS (YEARS) : 40 YEARS 4. TYPE OF SLUM : ALL TYPES OF HOUSES 5. NO. OF SHELTER UNITE BY TYPE : THATCHED : 62 ASBESTOS : 32 PUCCA : 36 TINNED : -- TILED : -- ALL : -- 6. LEVEL OF COMMON FACILITIES : FACILITY TYPE NOS. PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY TAP 2 HAND PUMP 1 WELL 10 PUBLIC TOILET LATRINE 8 STREET LIGHTS SVL 5 TL 5 SCHOOL PRE – SCHOOL - ADULT EDUCN. CENTRE NIL DRINS OPEN 0.2 KM ROADS COVERED 0.2 KM OTHER COMMUNITY FACILITY NOON MEAL CENTRE & SCHOOL 1
------
188
ABSTRACT
Name of Slum: Power House Road
Sl. Central State Beneficiari Name of Scheme Total Cost No 50 % 38 % es 12 %
New House Rs.92,000/- 1. 46.00 23.00 17.48 5.52 unit x 50 Nos. Retaining wall work at 2. Kiruthumal Channel in 24.80 12.40 12.40 -- Ward No.40 (North Side) Retaining wall work at 3. Kiruthumal Channel in 24.80 12.40 12.40 -- Ward No.40 (North Side) Retaining wall work at 4. Kiruthumal Channel in 23.20 11.60 11.60 -- Ward No.40 (North Side) 5. Street Light 0.60 0.30 0.30 --
TOTAL 119.40 59.70 54.18 5.52
189
MADURAI CORPORATION
Power House Road
Power House Road is one of the slum cluster among 208 slums of Madurai City and is located at about 1000 Metre from Heart of the City. The population of this slum as per 2001 census is 1150 Nos. and approximately 224 Nos. of House hold are there. A detailed survey on present status of slum with respect to nature of housing basic amenities infrastructures and socio economic status has been carried out for proposing on site improvement by the Corporation.
Housing :
In the recent survey it is identified that 36 Nos. of RCC roof 32 Nos. of AC/ Tilled roof and 62 Nos. of Thatched roof are present in the slum. Of which, Tiled/ AC roof are/ are not required New housing and entire Tacked roof is required. New Housing and hence it is proposed to construct 50 Nos. and new housing at the rate of Rs.92000/- net with central, state and beneficiary contribution The list of beneficiaries enclosed in the respective annexure and the land owned by the beneficiaries are free from encroachment.
Water Supply:
At present water supply is being supplied thro’ Pipe system from TB Tank OHT Distribution network, thro 110 mm dia PVC/ Pipe. At present 2 Nos. household having house service connection with 15 Nos. of stand posts. It is proposed to revamped the entire city level distribution network in the separate project. Hence no proposal has been given except Nil Nos. hand pumps/ power pumps to meet the present needs.
Sewerage:
As the Slum pocket is covered already under NRCP of Phase-I/II UGD Scheme/to be covered under separate project for omitted Slums and areas are a separate Project no proposal has been made in this proposal.
190
Roads and Strom Water Drain:
It has 0.45 Kms of Retaining Wall, the walls are in damaged conditions and is require. Hence it is proposed 0.45 Kms of Retaining Wall.
Solid Waste Management:
In this Slum 1.45 MT of MSW is generated and 1.40 MT of MSW is cleared daily with available Mechanism. An integrated Solid Waste Management project at City level is being formulated under JNNURM and hence no proposal has been proposed.
Street Light:
It is having 5 Nos. of Sodium Vapor Light and 6 Nos. of Tube Lights. Now it is proposed 1 Nos. of SVL and 10 Nos. of Tube Lights
Community Centers:
It is having Community Center nearly and hence it is not proposed to construct a Community Center for this Slum.
Maternity Center:
Maternity Center is located nearly and hence it is not proposed Maternity Center.
Social Amenities:
Social Amenities like Pre-school Education, Anganwadi and other Programmes like SJSRY , Marriage loans are available in the Vicinity and hence no of proposal is included in this Slum. Park and Play Fields:
Parks and Play fields are located in nearby areas and also due to non availability land. It is not proposed in this Slum.
191
192
193
PROFORMA – 2
2.1 Various Components of Schemes
S.No. Description
Name of the schemes Please put a tick mark against schemes selected 1 Provision of shelter including up gradation & ----- construction of new houses. (on site improvement) 2 Slum relocation ----- 3 Provision of community toilets/baths ----- 4 Provision of physical amenities ----- Access to safe water supply ----- Sewerage ----- Drainage/ storm water drains √ Solid waste collection ----- Widening and paving of existing lanes ----- Street lights, etc. ----- 5 Community Infrastructure like provision of ----- community centers ----- 6 Community Primary Health Care Center Buildings ----- 7 Social Amenities like preschool education ----- Preschool education ----- Nonformal education ----- Adult education ----- Maternity center ----- 8 Project development Framework ----- Public private partnership in housing and infrastructure ----- development ----- Housing supplied by Developer/Contractors ----- 9 Sites and Services schemes -----
194
PROFORMA – 3
3.1 Slum (Cluster) Level Details
Sl. Description No. Details about the scheme to be Details to be provided selected POWER HOUSE ROAD 1. Name of the Selected Schemes Population to be served in the 2. 1150 Nos. Selected Scheme Area to be covered in the Selected 3. 6160 Sqm Scheme 4. Area of Slum Clusters (Selected) 6160 Sqm 5. Target Population SC / ST % OBC % General % 920 80 196 17 34 3 6. BENEFICIARIES Identification Contribution Beneficiaries Identification Identified Ration Card Enclosed Separately Name in the voter list (Electoral
Card) BPL Card Note: Please Submit the list of beneficiaries along with the identification proof and beneficiaries contribution towards the scheme 7. SOCIAL SECURITY List out all the facilities envisaged for widows, single women and disabled, old age Enclosed Separately List out the activities done by the NGOs and the CBOs in the slum cluster 8. LINKAGES Location of the Scheme in the town map (please locate the slum cluster Enclosed on a map and submit it with the report) showing the following 9. Accessibility in respect to In Km. Major Roads 0.30 km Water Supply 0.20 km Electric Sub Station 0.10 km Main Sewer Line --- Main Drainage Lines --- Tele Communication Network 0.30 km Local Bus Stops (for city 0.30 km transportation) Primary Health Centres / Maternity 1.00 km Centers
195
Sl. Description No. Facilities for pre school Education 0.50 km Non – Formal Education Primary Schools 0.50 km Community Centers 0.85 km Facilities for Audit Education ----- Work Centers ----- Town Centers 1.50 Km Railway Station 2.00 Km Bus Stand (ISBT) 1.80 Km 10. SOCIO – ECONOMIC DETAILS a. BPL Population and its percentage Male % Female % 523 50.53 512 49.47 b. Others and its percentage Male % Female % ------11. HOUSEHOLD INCOME a. Below Average Income Male % Female % 6250 70 3125 30 b. Above Average Income Male % Female % 6250 70 3125 30 12. EDUCATION a. Literate Male % Female % 380 33 137 12 b. Illiterate Male % Female % 34 2.8 46 4 c. Matriculation and above Male % Female % 18 1.5 12 1
13. SERVICE AVAILBLE
Location of the slum cluster with Enclosed respect to cities network water
supply, sewerage, drainage, solid
waste disposal, major roads and
Transport facilities
ACCESSIBILITY TO SAFE Total Percentage WATER a. Individual Connection 15 40% Individual Taps ------Hand Pumps -- -- b. Public Taps 2 0.13% c. Hand Pumps (Public) 1 50% d. Others with no accessibility p.p ------14. SEWERAGE CONNECTION ------No. of Households covered 100 50 % 15. SEPTIC TANK Total Percentage
196
Sl. Description No. No. of Households covered ------COMMUNITY TOILETS / 16. Total Percentage BATHS No. of Households covered 180 80 17. OPEN DEFECTION Total Percentage No. of Households covered ------18. ELECTRIC CONNECTION Total Percentage No. of Households having electric 224 100 connection 19. STREET LIGHT Total Percentage No. of Streets covered 2 85 20. EXISTING STREETS Kachha (km) Pacca (km) B.T. -- 21. SOLID WASTE 350m a. Total Waste generated in the clustor 1.45 MT b. Total Waste collected in the clustor 1.40 MT Submit layout of the slum pocket with photographs and with all land details
Enclosed
STAKEHOLDERS 22. PERCEPTION Identify the all the Stakeholder of a. Identified - List Enclosed the Scheme Stakeholder view for up gradation of the existing site or relocation of On site upgradation and construction of new b. the slum pocket at an appropriate houses. site within the municipal / urban area boundary Note: Details out the whole process and attach it with the report and give reasons for selection for up gradation / relocation of the slum pocket.
Workshop of the stakeholder should be conducted to assess their views.
197
3.2 FRAMEWORK FOR SCHEMES
3.2.1. Provision of Shelter Including up gradation & Construction of New Houses (on site improvement)
3.2.1.1. HOUSEHOLD DETAILS
Sl. No. Description Details 1. No. of Household to be covered 50 2. Average household area 25.4 Sqm
3.2.1.2. LAND REQUIREMENTS
Sl. No. Description Details LAND DETAILS UNIT IN HECTARES
Total area of land to be used in Existing Proposed Total 1. the Project ----- 1270 1270
Details about the ownership of Government Private Others 2. the Land √√√ ------Note:
Land acquisition cost will not be financed except for the acquisition of the private land for schemes / projects in the North Eastern States and hilly states, viz Himachal Pradesh, Uttaranchal and Jammu and Kashmir.
Existing and proposed layout of the slum cluster should be submitted.
198
3.2.1.3. CEILING COST OF THE DWELLING UNIT Sl. Dwelling Unit Details Dwelling Unit Cost No. New Improvement Total Construction 1. * Cost per dwelling Unit 92,000 92,000 2. Government Contribution 46,000 46,000 3. Beneficiaries Contribution 34,960 34,960 Any other Contribution 4. 11,040 11,040 from other sources TOTAL 92,000 92,000 What is the percentage contribution of 5. 12 % 12 % beneficiaries of total contribution Total number of dwelling 6. 50 46,00,000 unit to be constructed Note : 1) Details of the Construction based on the estimates should be submitted. 2) Ceiling cost of the dwelling unit will be @ of Rs. 92,000 per unit includes internal w/s, sanitation, electricity etc. for cities other than those covered under the Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission (JnNURM). 3) For Special category / hilly states and difficult far flung areas, 12.5 % additionally will be permissible over and above the prescribed ceiling cost per dwelling unit. 4) A minimum of 12% beneficiaries contributions should be stipulated, which in the case of SC / ST/ OBC/ PH and other weaker section shall be 10% 3.2.1.4. Details of the Dwelling Unit Sl. Description No. Dwelling Unit Details ------Proposed area of the 1. 25.40 Sq.m. dwelling unit Number of rooms 2. proposed to be made per Two Rooms dwelling unit Density of proposed 3. 92 % houses Ground coverage of 4. 95 % proposed housing complex Area under Roads / green 5. 3% area Note 1) Please attach the detailed housing plans. 2) Minimum floor area of the dwelling unit should not be less than 25 Sq.mtrs. Area and preferably two room accommodation plus kitchen and toilet should be constructed. 3) Housing should be in configuration of G+2 / G+3 (Ground + 2 Floors or Ground + 3 Floors) 4) Local Municipal Bye laws should be followed and plans should be approved by the concerned authority.
199
3.2.1.5 Type of Material to be Used for Houses
Sl. No. Description Details
Type of Material used in housing 1. construction for low cost housing Bricks, Steel, Sand, Stone and cement (provide details) Local material that may be used in 2. “ housing (provide details)
3.2.1.5 Tenure Details
Sl. No. Description Details
Land tenure ship should be secured by 1. Patta giving patta etc. – elaborate Details of the beneficiaries contribution 2. ------for land / DUs ownership Area of the plot / DUs to be allotted by 3. ------the Government to the beneficiaries Details of the conditions to be imposed 4. ------on beneficiaries at the time of allotment Male 5. Details of legal heir of the property Female Joint Name (Special Cases Only) Nil Nil Nil Note:
Title of the land should be preferably in the name of the name of the wife and alternatively jointly in the names of husband and wife. In exceptional cases, title in the name of male beneficiary may be permitted.
200
4. PROVISIONS OF COMMUNITY TOILETS/BATHS (Under this schemes construction and development of toilets complexes including bathing facilities for men and women will be considered.) Note: This scheme is only applicable in that slum up gradation sites where the houses are not having individual toilets. 4.1 PROVISIONS OF COMMUNITY TOILETS
S.No. Community involvement Yes No 1 Tendering process --- a Contractor --- b Department work -- 2 Consultation with the community in location of the toilets --- 3 Consultation with the community consultation in designing --- 4 Consultation with the community in construction of the toilet --- 5 Consultation with the community in maintenance of the --- toilets 6 Social mobilization of the community ensured --- 7 Beneficiaries participation to be ensured --- 8 Is there any provision of design of different toilets for women --- and child 9 What percentage of population is covered with sewerage 80 % system 10 What percentage of population is covered with septic tank --- 11 What is the provision for remaining population -- 12 Number of families served with one community toilet --.
4.2 POPULATION COVERED BY EXISTING AND PROPOSED TOILET COMPLEXES UNDER VARIOUS PROGRAMMES S.No. Toilet Complexes Population % covered 1 Population covered by existing toilet complexes ------2 Population to be covered by the toilets proposed ------under the scheme 3 Population to be covered by toilet complexes ------proposed under other projects 4 Number of households covered with one ------community toilets 5 Population covered by private and individual ------toilets 6 Others ------Total ------
201
4.3 COST OF THE PROJECT S.No. DETAILS NUMBER COST 1 No. of community toilets to be constructed ------2 Cost of one such community toilets ------3 Total cost of all community toilets ------5. PROVISION OF PHYSICAL AMENITIES
(Under this scheme access to safe water supply, sewerage, storm water drains, solid waste collection, widening and paving of internal roads and street lights will be considered)
5.1 ACCESS TO SAFE WATER
S.NO DESCRIPTION DETAILS 1 Total supply of water per day 1,50,000 lpcd 2 Supply from various sources Population Percentage served
Municipal taps 150 0.13% Hand pumps 75 40% Other sources P.P. 800 80% 3 Per capita supply 70 Litres 4 Duration of Supply (hrs) 2 Hours 5 Population covered (%) 58 % 6 Project Cost A Separate Project for revamping entire city level distribution network. Hence no proposal is proposed. 7 Present cost of water supply (user charges) Rs. 412/- per year
8 Revenue generation for sustainable W/S ---
9 Fund required and cost sharing mechanism 50 % Govt. of India 50 % State Govt. 10 Scheme for existing/proposed water recycling and ----- harvesting Note: Detail cost estimate to be submitted based on Schedule of Rates
5.2 SEWERAGE
S.NO DESCRIPTION DETAILS 1 Water supplied klt/day 100 K.Litre 2 Sewer Generated 80% of the w/s 80.00
3 Proposed No. of sewer connections --- Individual 1122 Nos. community --- 4 Proposed Length of sewer (km’s) 250 M Septic tanks ----
202
1 Proposed no of septic tank at the household level ---- 2 Proposed number of Community septic tanks ---- Note: Detail cost estimate to be submitted based on Schedule of Rates ----
5.3 STROM WATER DRAINS S.NO DESCRIPTION DETAILS Existing Proposed Length (km’s) 0.20 0.45
Length of road (km’s) 0.25 ---
Coverage of system(%) 70% ---
Note: Detail cost estimate to be submitted based on Schedule of Rates
5.4 SOLID WASTE
S.NO DESCRIPTION DETAILS 1 Total Waste Generated 1.45 MT 2 Total Waste Collected 1.40 MT 3 Management of waste A Separate Project for to entire city is prepare under JNNURM. Note: Detail cost estimate to be submitted based on Schedule of Rates
5.5 WASTE COLLECTION
S.No TYPES OF WASTE COLLECTION EXISTING PROPOSED POINTS
1 Waste Depots (dhalao) ------2 Dustbins ------3 R.C. container ------4 Total ------Note: Detail cost estimate to be submitted based on Schedule of Rates
203
5.6 WIDENING AND PAVING OF INTERNAL ROADS
S.No DESCRIPTION EXISTING PROPOSED 1 Length of roads 250 M Earthen C.C.ROAD 2 Kachha ------3 Pacca ------Note: Detail cost estimate to be submitted based on Schedule of Rates
5.7 STREET LIGHTS
S.No DESCRIPTION EXISTING PROPOSED 1 Street Lights SVL – 5 SVL – 1 (one per 30 mts of road length) TL - 6 TL – 10 Note: Detail cost estimate to be submitted based on Schedule of Rates 6. COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURES LIKE PROVISION OF COMMUNITY CENTERS
S.No COMMUNITY CENTRE DETAILS IN SQ MTS EXISTING PROPOSED 1 Area exiting/proposed for the community ------center 2 Number of rooms existing/ proposed in the ------community center 3 Size of the room existing /proposed in the ------community center 4 Size of toilets existing/proposed in the ------community center Note: Detail cost estimate to be submitted along with the detailed plan of building to be constructed or upgraded
204
6.1 COMMUNITY PRIMARY HEALTH CARE CENTRE BUILDINGS/ COMMUNITY HALL
S. BUILDING DETAILS EXISTING PROPOSED No Number Populati Number Populatio on served n served 1 Number of Primary Health Centre/ ------Facility available 2 Number of rooms for the primary health ------centre 3 Toilets facilities available 8 Nos. ------
4 Population served by the community ------centers/ hall Note: Location of the Health centers in the overall layout plan to be shown Plan of the existing /proposed health centre Detail cost estimate to be submitted along with the detailed plan of building to be constructed or upgraded
6.2 MATERNITY CENTRE
S.No Building Detail EXISTING PROPOSED
Populati Populatio n Number Number on served served 1 Area of the maternity centre (Sq.mts) ------
2 Number of rooms in the maternity ------centre
3 Size of the room in the maternity ------centre 4 Number of toilets in the maternity ------centre Note: Location of the Maternity centers in the overall layout plan to be shown Plan of the existing /proposed health centre Detail cost estimate to be submitted along with the detailed plan of building to be constructed or upgraded
205
7. SOCIAL AMENITIES
7.1 PRESCHOOL EDUCATION
S.No DESCRIPTION EXISTING PROPOSED
Number Populati Number Populatio n on served served
1 Facilities for preschool education ------2 Population served ------Note: Detail cost estimate to be submitted based on Schedule of Rates
7.2 NONFORMAL EDUCATION
S.No DESCRIPTION EXISTING PROPOSED
Number Populati Number Populatio n on served served
1 Facilities for nonformal education ------2 Population served ------Note: Detail cost estimate to be submitted based on Schedule of Rates
7.3 ADULT EDUCATION
S.No DESCRIPTION EXISTING PROPOSED
Number Population Number Population served served
1 Facilities for adult education ------2 Population served ------Note: Detail cost estimate to be submitted based on Schedule of Rates
7.4 AGANWADI/ CRECHES
S.No DESCRIPTION EXISTING PROPOSED
Number Populati Number Populatio n on served served
1 Facilities for aganwadi/creches 1 ------2 Population served 45 ------Note: Detail cost estimate to be submitted based on Schedule of Rates
7.5 PARKS AND PLAYGROUND
206
S.No DESCRIPTION EXISTING PROPOSED
Number Populati Number Populatio n on served served
1 Park and playground in the area ------2 Population served ------Note: Detail cost estimate to be submitted based on Schedule of Rates
7.6 LIVELIHOOD SUPPORT PROGRAMMES
S.No DESCRIPTION EXISTING PROPOSED
Number Populati Number Populatio n on served served
1 Saving and credit programmes ------2 Training programmes ------3 Income generation programmes through ------other means Note: Detail out all the NGOs/CBOs scheme being done in the livelihood support programmes
8. PROJECT DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 8.1 Public private partnership in housing and infrastructure development S.No Public Private Partnership Mechanism 1 Identification of the need for public private ------partnership 2 Any information for initiating the partnership ------3 Define the objective of the particular project and ------the necessity of partnership 4 Information on the particular project ------5 Identification Constraints in the partnership and its ------rectifications 6 Defining Parameters for the particular project ------7 What kind of Financing Mechanism is being ------worked out in the project 8 How will the cost be recovered or sustained in the ------project 9 What kind of tendering and Procurement ------mechanism is being worked out 10 Explain the Monitoring & Evaluation mechanism ------in the project Note: Elaborate the steps in the public private partnership model to be implemented at the slum cluster level
207
9. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SCHEME
INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK FOR PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK FOR PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION 1 Is the organization employing external agency for ------project support consultant ( provide details) 2 Name of the local agencies for project implementation Madurai Corporation (provide details) 3 Tendering committee to be involved in the project Council (provide details)
10. MANAGEMENT OF THE PROJECT MANAGEMENT OF THE PROJECT 1 CEO/ Chief of the local bodies Commissioner
2 Project Director Commissioner
3 Project ImplementationHeaded by EE/AE ( Superintending Engineer institutional flow chart to be developed) E.E., A.E.E., & A.E., / J.E.,
11. RESOURCE MOBILIZATION AND BUDGETARY ALLOCATION SOURCES OF FINANCES RESOURCE MOBILIZATION AND BUDGETARY ALLOCATION 1 What is the ULBs own resources contribution in the ------project envisaged 2 State Government contribution in the project 50%
3 Beneficiaries Contribution in the project ------
4 Central Government agencies contribution in the 50% project 5 ESCROW account to be maintained or any other ------mechanism for transparency and better management and utilization of funds 6 What kind of State Guarantee mechanism to be ------developed 7 Any Other -----
Note: Detail out all the resource mobilization and budgetary allocation in the project
208
12. MONITORING MECHANISM
Monitoring Mechanism
Internal mechanism 1 Utilization of the fund a model to be developed Corporation
2 Project completion cycle to be based on PERT/CPM Corporation
3 Progress reporting developed for the project Corporation
External mechanism CMA 1 What are the various step taken for evaluation by the ------monitoring agency 2
13. REVIEWING DEVELOPMENT ONES IN TWO TO THREE YEARS TO ACCOMMODATE/ ADJUST THE ONGOING CHANGES IN THE SOCIETY/ CITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES
Reviewing development 1 Reviewing committee and its composition (submit the ------composition that has bee envisaged in the project) 2 Feedback to be sent to the management / State ------Government ( indicate the mechanism developed by the state to give feedback about the project) 3 Restructuring implementation programme on basis of ------feedback (indicate the ways in which the programme may be restructured after getting the feedback)
14. REFORMS
S.No PROJECT REFORMS 1 What steps have been taken for improvement in urban Under JNURM governance? 2 What mandatory reforms have been taken up for smooth Under JNURM functioning of the project. 3 What optional reforms have been taken up for smooth Under JNURM functioning of the project? 4 What sate level reforms have been taken up for smooth Under JNURM functioning of the project? 5 Have the agency gone into the agreement for Memorandum Under JNURM of Agreement (MoA) with the Government of India committing to implement the reform programme.
Note: The States/ULBs need to choose at least two Optional Reforms each year for implementation. The details of reforms which have been implemented and/or proposed to be taken up should be included in the detailed project reports.
209
15. TOTAL PROJECT COST
S.No PROJECT COST
1 What is the total cost of the project selected 119.40 a 1st Project selected 23.20 b 2nd Project selected 24.80 c 3rd Project selected 24.80 d 4th Project selected 46.00 e 5th Project Selected 0.60 Total Cost 119.40
16. PROJECT CONTRIBUTIONS
S.No PROJECT CONTRIBUTION
1 Central 59.70 2 State 54.18 3 ULBs -- 4 Others 5.52 Total 119.40
210
PART - I DETAILED MEASUREMENT SHEET
Measurement in S. Con Total Details of work Nos. Meter No. tents Qty L B D
1. Sand and silt under water SS 20B Earth work excavation and depositing on bank with initial lead of 10m and initial life of 2m in slush and silt under water upto 0.75m depth requiring the aid of baskets and vessels SS 20B
Kiruthumaal channel Retaining 1x1 220.00 1.60 1.75 644.00 wall
Sundries 6.00
650.00 650m3
2. Supplying and filling in foundation and basement with river sand in layer of 15cm, thick well rammed and consolidated including watering complying with standard specification etc., complete
Kiruthumaal Channel retaining 1x1 220.00 1.60 0.45 158.40 wall
Sundries 1.60
160.00 160m3
3. Cement concrete in 1:4:8 (one cement, four sand, eight
211
aggregate) using 40mm, hard broken granite jelly for foundation including consolidation and dewatering for foundation wherever necessary etc complete
Kiruthumaal Channel retaining 1x1 220.00 1.60 0.30 105.00 wall
Sundries 0.40
106.00 106m3
4. Supplying and erecting shuttering with necessary supports for plinth beam with all cross bracings etc complete (RCC Column, roofing, plinth beam and lintel side)
Kiruthumaal Channel retaining 1x1 220.00 1.30+ 3.60 1386 wall 0.45/2
1x2 220.00 3.60 - 1584.00
2970.00 2970m2
5. Plain cement concrete 1:2:4 (one cement two sand and four aggregate) using 20mm gauge hard broken granite chips (Machine broken) including watering and consolidation etc., complete
Kiruthumaal Channel retaining 1x1 220.00 1.30+ 3.60 693.00 wall 0.45/2
Sundries 2.00
695.00 695m3
212
6. For Earth bund provision L.S.
7. For Dewatering purpose L.S.
8. Provision for expansion joint tar L.S. sheet
9. Unforeseen item of work L.S.
10. P.S.Charges L.S.
PART – II ABSTRACT OF ESTIMATE
S. Qty Description of work Rate Per Amount No.
1. 650m3 Sand and silt under water 32.47 1m3 21106.00 SS 20B Earth work excavation and depositing on bank with initial lead of 10m and initial life of 2m in slush and silt under water upto 0.75m depth requiring the aid of baskets and vessels SS 20B
2. 160m3 Supplying and filling in 386.70 1m3 61872.00 foundation and basement with river sand in layer of 15cm, thick well rammed and consolidated including watering complying with standard specification etc., complete
3. 106m3 Cement concrete in 1:4:8 1628.90 1m3 172663.00 (one cement, four sand, eight aggregate) using
213
40mm, hard broken granite jelly for foundation including consolidation and dewatering for foundation wherever necessary etc complete
4. 2970m2 Supplying and erecting 1778.00 10m2 528066.00 shuttering with necessary supports for plinth beam with all cross bracings etc complete (RCC Column, roofing, plinth beam and lintel side)
5. 695m3 Plain cement concrete 1:2:4 2420.00 1m3 1681900.00 (one cement two sand and four aggregate) using 20mm gauge hard broken granite chips (Machine broken) including watering and consolidation etc., complete
6. For Earth bund provision L.S. 10000.00
7. For Dewatering purpose L.S. 3000.00
8. Provision for expansion L.S. 1000.00 joint tar sheet
9. Unforeseen item of work L.S. 393.00
Grand total of the estimate 2480000.00
Station: Madurai (Officer in charge):
Dated: (Designation): Assistant Engineer
214
Technically sanctioned for Rs...... Administrative sanction accorded
and Registered as C.E’s No...... Ordinary for Rs. ______Capital
Corporation Engineer. Commissioner Corporation of Madurai Corporation of Madurai
215
PART - I DETAILED MEASUREMENT SHEET
Measurement in S. Con Total Details of work Nos. Meter No. tents Qty L B D
1. Sand and silt under water SS 20B Earth work excavation and depositing on bank with initial lead of 10m and initial life of 2m in slush and silt under water upto 0.75m depth requiring the aid of baskets and vessels SS 20B
Kiruthumaal channel Retaining 1x1 220.00 1.60 1.75 644.00 wall
Sundries 6.00
650.00 650m3
2. Supplying and filling in foundation and basement with river sand in layer of 15cm, thick well rammed and consolidated including watering complying with standard specification etc., complete
Kiruthumaal Channel retaining 1x1 220.00 1.60 0.45 158.40 wall
Sundries 1.60
160.00 160m3
3. Cement concrete in 1:4:8 (one cement, four sand, eight
216
aggregate) using 40mm, hard broken granite jelly for foundation including consolidation and dewatering for foundation wherever necessary etc complete
Kiruthumaal Channel retaining 1x1 220.00 1.60 0.30 105.00 wall
Sundries 0.40
106.00 106m3
4. Supplying and erecting shuttering with necessary supports for plinth beam with all cross bracings etc complete (RCC Column, roofing, plinth beam and lintel side)
Kiruthumaal Channel retaining 1x1 220.00 1.30+ 3.60 1386 wall 0.45/2
1x2 220.00 3.60 - 1584.00
2970.00 2970m2
5. Plain cement concrete 1:2:4 (one cement two sand and four aggregate) using 20mm gauge hard broken granite chips (Machine broken) including watering and consolidation etc., complete
Kiruthumaal Channel retaining 1x1 220.00 1.30+ 3.60 693.00 wall 0.45/2
Sundries 2.00
695.00 695m3
217
6. For Earth bund provision L.S.
7. For Dewatering purpose L.S.
8. Provision for expansion joint tar L.S. sheet
9. Unforeseen item of work L.S.
10. P.S.Charges L.S.
218
PART – II ABSTRACT OF ESTIMATE
S. No. Qty Description of work Rate Per Amount
1. 650m3 Sand and silt under water SS 32.47 1m3 21106.00 20B Earth work excavation and depositing on bank with initial lead of 10m and initial life of 2m in slush and silt under water upto 0.75m depth requiring the aid of baskets and vessels SS 20B
2. 160m3 Supplying and filling in 386.70 1m3 61872.00 foundation and basement with river sand in layer of 15cm, thick well rammed and consolidated including watering complying with standard specification etc., complete
3. 106m3 Cement concrete in 1:4:8 (one 1628.90 1m3 172663.00 cement, four sand, eight aggregate) using 40mm, hard broken granite jelly for foundation including consolidation and dewatering for foundation wherever necessary etc complete
4. 2970m2 Supplying and erecting 1778.00 10m2 528066.00 shuttering with necessary supports for plinth beam with all cross bracings etc complete (RCC Column, roofing, plinth beam and lintel side)
219
5. 695m3 Plain cement concrete 1:2:4 2420.00 1m3 1681900.00 (one cement two sand and four aggregate) using 20mm gauge hard broken granite chips (Machine broken) including watering and consolidation etc., complete
6. For Earth bund provision L.S. 10000.00
7. For Dewatering purpose L.S. 3000.00
8. Provision for expansion joint L.S. 1000.00 tar sheet
9. Unforeseen item of work L.S. 393.00
Grand total of the estimate 2480000.00
Station: Madurai (Officer in charge):
Dated: (Designation): Assistant Engineer
Technically sanctioned for Rs...... Administrative sanction accorded
and Registered as C.E’s No...... Ordinary for Rs. ______Capital
Corporation Engineer. Commissioner Corporation of Madurai Corporation of Madurai
220
PART II - ABSTRACT OF ESTIMATE
Qty. Description of work Rate Per Amount
1230 1) Earth work excavation in all kinds of 444.30 10 m3 54649.00 m3 soil except hard rock requiring blasting, inclusive of shoring, strutting and baling out water wherever necessary etc. complete
620 2) Filling gravel in layer of 25cm. thick 1354.48 10 m3 83978.00 m3 including cost of gravel stac king for premeasurements watering and consolidation by POWER ROLLER using 13.50cum. of gravel for 10m3 of finished work etc.,complete
620 3) Supplying and filling in basement with 386.70. 1 m3 239754.00 m3 river sand in layers of 15cm. thick well rammed and consolidated including watering complying with standard specification etc.complete
410 4) Cement concrete in 1:4:8 (One cement, 1628.90 1 m3 667849.00 m3 four sand, eight aggregate) using 40mm. hard broken granite jelly for foundation including consolidation and dewatering for foundation wherever necessary etc.,complete
410 5) Plain Cement concrete 1:1½:3 (One 3073.00 1 m3 1259930.00 m3 cement One and a half sand and three aggregate) using 20mm. gauge hard broken granite chips (Machine broken) including watering and consolidation etc.,complete
L.S. 6)Provision for Expansion joint Tar sheet L.S. 10000.00
221
L.S. 7) Unforeseen Item of work 1000.00
L.S. 8) P.S.Charges L.S. 2840.00
2320000.00
Station: (Officer in Charge)
Dated: (Designation)
Tecnical sanctioned for Rs...... Administrative Sanction accorded
and registered as C.E’s No...... Ordinary/Capital for Rs......
Corporation Engineer, Commissioner Corporation of Madurai Corporation of Madurai
222
Madurai Corporation Detailed Estimate Name of Work : Construction of Dwelling unit Sl. Description of work No L B D Contents Total No 1 Earthwork excavation in all soil for foundation with initial lead and lift in all soils and sub soils to the required depth as directed by the departmental officers etc complete as per standard specifications. Wall all round 1x1 19.58 0.90 1.00 17.62 Room cross portion 1x1 4.43 0.90 1.00 3.98 Portion WC Bath 0.40 22.00 22 m3
2 Supply and filling river sand including cost of all materials and and all labour charges etc., complete complying with standard specification etc., Wall all round 1x1 19.58 0.90 0.10 1.76 Room cross portion 1x1 4.43 0.90 0.10 0.40 2.16 2 m3
3 Cement concrete with hard boken grnite stone jelly using 40mm gauge in cement concrete 1:5:10 (One cement five sand and ten aggregate) for foundation includidng cost and conveyance of all materials and all other incidental charges etc., complete complying with standard specifications. Wall all round 1x1 19.58 0.75 0.15 2.64 Room cross portion 1x1 4.43 0.75 0.15 0.59 Flooring 1x2 2.45 2.45 0.10 1.20 1x2 2.45 1.53 0.10 0.75 0.82 6.00 6 m3 4 Random rubble masonry in cement mortar 1 : 5 (One cement and five sand) for foundation and basement using new stones including simultaneous pointing of the exposed surface and all incidental charges such as baling out water, scaffolding curing, finishing etc., complete complying with standard specification
Wall all round 1x1 19.58 0.45 0.50 10.13 Room cross portion 1x1 4.43 0.45 1.15 2.29 0.58 13.00 13 m3
5 Brick work in cement mortar 1 : 5 ( one cement and five sand ) using chamber bricks of size 8 3/4 " x 4 1/4 " 2 3/4 " for the following items including curing etc complete complying with standard specificatin.
223
Wall all round 1x1 19.58 0.23 2.10 9.45 Room Portion 1x1 3.50 0.12 2.10 1.06 WC & Bath 1x1 2.45 0.12 2.10 0.62 (P) Door 1x2 0.90 0.23 2.10 0.87 (-) 1x2 0.70 0.23 2.10 0.68 (-) Window 1x1 0.90 0.23 0.90 0.19 (-) 1x4 1.20 0.23 1.20 1.32 (-) Ventilators 1x2 0.60 0.23 0.90 0.24 (-) All round 1x1 19.58 0.23 0.75 3.38 Portion room 1x1 4.20 0.12 0.75 0.37 WC & Bath 1x1 2.45 0.12 0.75 0.21 0.44 10 m3 10 m3
6 Providing centring shuttering to all RCC works in all materirals and all labour charges etc.. complete complying with standard specification.
Lintel 1x6 1.20 0.00 0.00 1.44 Roof 1x1 20.50 0.00 0.00 2.05 1x1 5.13 4.20 0.00 20.58 4.07 (-) 20.00 20 m2
7 Supplying and fabricating of Steel Including cost all works inclusive of 1x1 4 m3 x70 280.00 cost of Steel ( the rate included cost of binding wire also ) including kg cost of all materials and all labour charges etc.. completed complying with standard specification.
280.00 280 kg 8 Reinforced cement concrete 1:2:4 (One cement two sand four aggregate ) for all RCC works using 20 %mm gauge hard broken stone jelly excluding cost of reinforcement grill in position shuttering and centring but including laying curinglaying curing etc., complete complying with standard Lintel 1x1 19.58 0.45 0.08 0.66 Roof 1x1 19.58 0.23 0.15 0.68 1x1 5.59 4.66 0.10 2.60 0.06 4.00 4 m3
9 Supplying and fabricating and placing in position MS or RTS grill for reimbursement of all works inclusive of cost of steel ( the rate included cost of binding wire also) including cost of all materials and all labour charges etc complete complying with standard specification. Door 1x2 0.90 2.10 0.00 3.78 Door 1x2 0.75 2.10 0.00 3.15
224
Window 1x1 0.90 0.90 0.00 0.81 Window 1x4 1.20 1.20 0.00 5.76 Ventilator 1x2 0.60 0.90 0.00 1.08 0.42 15.00 100 kg
10 Plastering with cement mortar 1:4 (one cement four sand) 20 mm thick including finishing the surface cost and conveyance of all materials mixing curing and all other incidental charges etc., complete complying with standard specification. All round out side 1x1 20.50 -- 3.85 78.92 Door 2x2 0.90 -- 2.10 7.56 (-) Window 1x2 0.90 -- 0.90 1.62 (-) Window 2x4 1.20 -- 1.20 11.52 (-)
Inner side Kitchen room 1x1 7.96 -- 3.00 23.88 Room 1x2 9.80 -- 3.00 58.80 Open 1x2 0.70 -- 3.00 4.20 (-) WC 1x2 5.06 -- 3.00 30.36 Bath 1x1 1.53 -- 3.00 4.59 Ventilator 1x3 0.60 -- 0.90 1.62 (-) 3.99 120.00 120 m2
11 White washing Plastering inner side are 1x1 ------40.00 40 m2
12 Colour washing two coats and plastering outside area 1x1 ------80.00 80 m2
13 Contigences Other Items including water closet Leeach bit - LS -
225
226
MADURAI CORPORATION ABSTRACT Name of Work : Construction of dewelling Unit S.No Qty Description of Items Rate Per Amount 1 22 m3 Earthwork excavation in all soil for foundation with initial 44.30 m3 975.00 lead and lift in all soils and sub soils to the required depth as directed by the departmental officers etc complete as per standard specifications. 2 2 m3 Supply and filling river sand including cost of all materials and 386.70 m3 773.00 and all labour charges etc., complete complying with standard specification etc., 3 6 m3 Cement concrete with hard boken grnite stone jelly 1505.70 m3 9034.00 using 40mm gauge in cement concrete 1:5:10 (One cement five sand and ten aggregate) for foundation includidng cost and conveyance of all materials and all other incidental charges etc., complete complying with standard specifications. 4 13 m3 Random rubble masonry in cement mortar 1 : 5 (One 1349.80 m3 17547.40 cement and five sand) for foundation and basement using new stones including simultaneous pointing of the exposed surface and all incidental charges such as baling out water, scaffolding curing, finishing etc., complete complying with standard specification
5 10 m3 Brick work in cement mortar 1 : 5 ( one cement and five sand 2149.10 m3 21491.00 ) using chamber bricks of size 8 3/4 " x 4 1/4 " 2 3/4 " for the following items including curing etc complete complying with standard specificatin. 6 20 m2 Providing centring shuttering to all RCC works in all materirals 216.40 m2 4328.00 and all labour charges etc.. complete complying with standard specification. 7 280 kg Supplying and fabricating of Steel Including cost all works 33.75 kg 9338.00 inclusive of cost of Steel ( the rate included cost of binding wire also ) including cost of all materials and all labour charges etc.. completed complying with standard specification.
8 4 m3 Reinforced cement concrete 1:2:4 2684.40 m3 10738.00 (One cement two sand four aggregate ) for all RCC works using 20 %mm gauge hard broken stone jelly excluding cost of reinforcement grill in position shuttering and centring but including laying curinglaying curing etc., complete complying with standard 9 100 kg Supplying and fixing of steel door and window including cost of 37.00 kg 3700.00 steel fabrication and fixing charges etc., complete 10 120 m2 Plastering with cement mortar 1:5 (one cement 54.70 m2 6564.00 five sand) 20 mm thick including finishing the
227
surface cost and conveyance of all materials mixing curing and all other incidental charges etc., complete complying with standard specification. 11 40 m2 White washing two coat using best shell lime including cost best shell lime and labour charges etc., complete 6.04 m2 242.00 12 80 m2 Colour washing two coats using best shell lime including cost of all materials and labour charges etc., complete 9.10 m2 718.00 13 - LS - Provision for Electrification Water Closet & RWH Structure 6551.60 TOTAL 92000.00 (Rupees Ninety Two Thousand only)
228
CHECK LIST FOR PRERATION / APPRAISAL OF DPR IN INTEGRATED HOUSING & SLUM DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME (IHSDP)
Slum Name: Theedeer Nagar Location: South Zone- Ward No. 31 Population: 6150
1 Name of the State Tamil Nadu 2 Category of State whether special category or general (Special category General States are J&K, Uttaranchal, Himachal Pradesh & North Eastern States including Sikkim) 3 Name of the City Madurai Status Remarks (Yes/No) 4 a) Whether MOA for reforms has been signed with the Ministry of urban Yes development? b) Whether a copy of the signed MOA has been received in the Ministry Yes of Urban Employment & poverty Alleviation or not? c) Whether signed MOA mentions with asterish that two reforms, viz., i) Yes Repeal of Urban Land Ceiling and Regulation Act; and ii) Amendment of Rent Control Laws balancing the interest of landlords and tenants are optional with regard to schemes under IHSDP? 5 Whether the State level Nodal Agency has been designated? Yes 6 Whether the DPR has been forwarded by the designated Nodal Agency? Yes 7 Whether State level Co ordination Committee (SLCC) has been Yes constituted? 8 Whether DPR has been recommended by the SLCC? Yes 9 Whether elected Local Body is in place? Yes 10 Total Urban population of the city (2001) 928,869 11 Total Slum population of the city 303,141 12 Is DPR an integrated housing & infrastructure project? ( If not, proper Yes justification) 13 Has the contribution from the beneficiaries been collected? Yes 14 Has the State share been deposited in a separate account Plinth Area Yes : 25Sqm 15 Is the DPR for in situ development Yes 16 Is the DPR for relocation? No 17 In case of relocation, whether all basic amenities have been provided for No in the new site in the DPR? 18 Is the new site in proximity to the original site / work place? 19 In case of in site. Whether provision for basic services has been provided Yes for in the DPR? 20 Housing i) Whether density of population norms has been observed in the DPR Yes with reference to city as per the bye laws? ii) Whether plotted area, setbacks and coverage of plot are as per Yes byelaws? iii) Whether maximum FAR Utilization has been considered in the DPR to Yes ensure efficient use of land? iv) Whether the dwelling unit cost is within the ceiling limit? Yes v) In case the cost is higher, whether the source of funds has been filed No up / indicated? vi) Whether security of tenure / patta has been provided to the Yes beneficiaries, as per guidelines, preferably women? vii) Whether the floor area of dwelling unit is equal or more than 25 sq Yes mtrs? viii) Whether each dwelling unit comprises two rooms, kitchen and a Yes
229
toilet? 21 Infrastructure facilities Whether provisioning for the following has been made in DPR i) Water Supply No. ii) Sewerage No iii) Solid waste disposal No iv) Development of roads/paths/footpaths/pavements No v) Storm water drains Yes vi) Street Lighting Yes 22 Whether environmental impact considerations have been taken into Yes account while preparing the DPR? 23 Community facilities Whether provisioning for the following has been made in DPR i) Community Centre No ii) Community Primary Health care centre No iii) Primary Education Centre No iv) Parks and open spaces No 24 Whether there is provisioning for convergence of the Central and State Government schemes in the following sectors in the DPR i) Health ii) Education iii) Social security including accidental and medical insurance, old age pension , old age homes etc 25 Whether cost of land has been included in the project cost where private No land has been acquired? ( Applicable only to special category stages, viz., J&K Uttaranchal, Himachal Pradesh and north eastern states including Sikkim 26 Whether a separate provisioning for upkeep and maintenance of public Yes assets to be created through this project has been made by the state Government / ULB / Parastatal? ( This provisioning will not be funded under the scheme) 27 Whether the area / beneficiaries covered under DPR had previously No benefited in any Central/ State Government Scheme? ( If so, details thereof ) 28 Whether DPR is a PPP Project? No 29 Is the DPR in accordance with the IHSDP guidelines? If not, indicate Yes deviations and provide justifications 30 Any other information relevant to the DPR
230
SURVEY OF SLUMS IN MADURAI PROFILE OF SLUMS IN THEEDER NAGAR MADURAI CORPORATION ------WARD NO. 31 SERIAL NO. : (South) NAME OF SLUM : Theeder Nagar ------1.SLUM BOUNDARIES EAST -WEST VELI STREET
WEST -KIRUTHUMAL CHANNEL
NORTH -PERIAR BUS STAND
SOUTH -MELAVASAL COLONY
2.OWNERSHIP OF LAND -MADURAI CORPORATION
3.AGE OF SLUMS(YEARS) -ABOVE 50 YEARS
4.TYPE OF SLUM -ALL TYPE OF HOUSES
5.NO.OF SHELTER UNITE BY TYPE THATCHED 116 ASBESTOS 303 PUCCA 344 TINNED - TILED -- ALL - √√√
6.LEVEL OF COMMEN FACILITIES FACILITIES TYPE NOS PUBULIC WATER SUPPLY TAP 10
HAND PUMP - 2
WELL WATER TAPS BY POWER PUMPS - 5
PUBLIC TOILET LATRINE 10 - STREET LIGHT SVL-7 TL-21 SCHOOL PRE-SCHOOL -YES---1 ADULT EDUCN.CENTRE -NIL
DRINS OPEN -NIL
ROADS UNCOVERED FULLY COVERED
OTHER COMMUNITY FACILITY NOON MEAL CENTER AND SCHOOL –NIL
231
ABSTRACT
Name of Slum: Theeder Nagar
Sl. Central State Beneficiari Name of Scheme Total Cost No 50 % 38 % es 12 %
New House Rs.92,000/- 1. 250.24 125.12 95.09 30.03 unit x 272 Nos. Construction of 2. Community Centre 6.25 3.125 3.125 -- at Theideer Nagar (31) 3. Street Light 1.40 0.70 0.70 --
TOTAL 257.89 128.945 98.915 30.03
232
MADURAI CORPORATION
Theeder Nagar
Theeder Nagar is one of the slum cluster among 208 slums of Madurai City and is located at about 100 Metre from Heart of the City. The population of this slum as per 2001 census is 6150 Nos. and approximately 612 Nos. of House hold are there. A detailed survey on present status of slum with respect to nature of housing basic amenities infrastructures and socio economic status has been carried out for proposing on site improvement by the Corporation.
Housing :
In the recent survey it is identified that 344 Nos. of RCC roof 303 Nos. of AC/ Tilled roof and 116 Nos. of Thatched roof are present in the slum. Of which, Tiled/ AC roof are/ are not required New housing and entire Tacked roof is required. New Housing and hence it is proposed to construct 272 Nos. and new housing at the rate of Rs.92000/- net with central, state and beneficiary contribution The list of beneficiaries enclosed in the respective annexure and the land owned by the beneficiaries are free from encroachment.
Water Supply:
At present water supply is being supplied thro’ Pipe system from TB Tank OHT Distribution network, thro 110 mm dia PVC/ Pipe. At present 68 Nos. household having house service connection with 10 Nos. of stand posts. It is proposed to revamped the entire city level distribution network in the separate project. Hence no proposal has been given except Nil Nos. hand pumps/ power pumps to meet the present needs.
Sewerage:
As the Slum pocket is covered already under NRCP of Phase-I/II UGD Scheme/to be covered under separate project for omitted Slums and areas are a separate Project no proposal has been made in this proposal.
233
Roads and Strom Water Drain:
It has Nil Kms of Road, the Roads are in damaged conditions and is require. Hence it is proposed Nil Kms of Road.
Solid Waste Management:
In this Slum 2.56 MT of MSW is generated and 2.21 MT of MSW is cleared daily with available Mechanism. An integrated Solid Waste Management project at City level is being formulated under JNNURM and hence no proposal has been proposed.
Street Light:
It is having 7 Nos. of Sodium Vapor Light and 21 Nos. of Tube Lights. Now it is proposed 1 Nos. of SVL and 11 Nos. of Tube Lights
Community Centers:
It is not having Community Center nearly and hence it is proposed to construct a Community Center for this Slum.
Maternity Center:
Maternity Center is located nearly and hence it is not proposed Maternity Center.
Social Amenities:
Social Amenities like Pre-school Education, Anganwadi and other Programmes like SJSRY , Marriage loans are available in the Vicinity and hence no of proposal is included in this Slum. Park and Play Fields:
Parks and Play fields are located in nearby areas and also due to non availability land. It is not proposed in this Slum.
234
235
236
PROFORMA – 2
2.1 Various Components of Schemes
S.No. Description
Name of the schemes Please put a tick mark against schemes selected 1 Provision of shelter including up gradation & √ construction of new houses. (on site improvement) 2 Slum relocation ----- 3 Provision of community toilets/baths ----- 4 Provision of physical amenities ----- Access to safe water supply ----- Sewerage ----- Drainage/ storm water drains ---- Solid waste collection ----- Widening and paving of existing lanes ----- Street lights, etc. √ 5 Community Infrastructure like provision of √ community centers √ 6 Community Primary Health Care Center Buildings ----- 7 Social Amenities like preschool education ----- Preschool education ----- Nonformal education ----- Adult education ----- Maternity center ----- 8 Project development Framework ----- Public private partnership in housing and infrastructure ----- development ----- Housing supplied by Developer/Contractors ----- 9 Sites and Services schemes -----
237
PROFORMA – 3
3.1 Slum (Cluster) Level Details
Sl. Description No. Details about the scheme to be Details to be provided selected Theedeer nager 1. Name of the Selected Schemes Population to be served in the 2. 6150 Nos. Selected Scheme Area to be covered in the Selected 3. 16,830 Sqm Scheme 4. Area of Slum Clusters (Selected) 16,830 Sqm 5. Target Population SC / ST % OBC % General % 4797 78 984 16 369 6 6. BENEFICIARIES Identification Contribution Beneficiaries Identification Identified Ration Card Enclosed Separately Name in the voter list (Electoral
Card) BPL Card Note: Please Submit the list of beneficiaries along with the identification proof and beneficiaries contribution towards the scheme 7. SOCIAL SECURITY List out all the facilities envisaged for widows, single women and disabled, old age Enclosed Separately List out the activities done by the NGOs and the CBOs in the slum cluster 8. LINKAGES Enclosed Location of the Scheme in the town
map (please locate the slum cluster
on a map and submit it with the
report) showing the following
9. Accessibility in respect to In Km. Major Roads 100m Water Supply 1500m Electric Sub Station 200m Main Sewer Line 550m Main Drainage Lines 280m Tele Communication Network 550 m Local Bus Stops (for city 200 m transportation)
238
Sl. Description No. Primary Health Centres / Maternity 400m Centers Facilities for pre school Education -- Non – Formal Education Primary Schools 350 m Community Centers 400 m Facilities for Audit Education 200 m Work Centers 100 m Town Centers 250m Railway Station 300m Bus Stand (ISBT) 75m 10. SOCIO – ECONOMIC DETAILS a. BPL Population and its percentage Male % Female % 2802 50.55 2741 49.45 b. Others and its percentage Male % Female % ------11. HOUSEHOLD INCOME a. Below Average Income Male % Female % 6120 70 3000 30 b. Above Average Income Male % Female % 6120 70 3000 30 12. EDUCATION a. Literate Male % Female % 1845 30 615 10 b. Illiterate Male % Female % 56 2 38 3 c. Matriculation and above Male % Female % 42 1.5 13 1 13. SERVICE AVAILBLE
Location of the slum cluster with
respect to cities network water Enclosed supply, sewerage, drainage, solid
waste disposal, major roads and
Transport facilities
ACCESSIBILITY TO SAFE Total Percentage WATER a. Individual Connection 68 1.12% Individual Taps - - Hand Pumps 3 2.17% b. Public Taps 10 100.00% c. Hand Pumps (Public) 2 2.60% d. Others with no accessibility p.p 10 100.00% 14. SEWERAGE CONNECTION - - No. of Households covered - -
239
Sl. Description No. 15. SEPTIC TANK Total Percentage No. of Households covered - - COMMUNITY TOILETS / 16. Total Percentage BATHS No. of Households covered 20Nos. 53.00% 17. OPEN DEFECTION Total Percentage No. of Households covered - - 18. ELECTRIC CONNECTION Total Percentage No. of Households having electric 825 100.00% connection 19. STREET LIGHT Total Percentage No. of Streets covered 7 100.00% 20. EXISTING STREETS - Kachha (km) 1.50km 100.00% Pacca (km) 7 100.00% 21. SOLID WASTE a. Total Waste generated in the clustor 2.56 MT b. Total Waste collected in the clustor 2.21 MT Submit layout of the slum pocket with photographs and with all land details
Enclosed
STAKEHOLDERS 22. PERCEPTION Identify the all the Stakeholder of a. Identified - List Enclosed the Scheme Stakeholder view for up gradation of the existing site or relocation of On site upgradation and construction of new b. the slum pocket at an appropriate houses. site within the municipal / urban area boundary Note: Details out the whole process and attach it with the report and give reasons for selection for up gradation / relocation of the slum pocket.
Workshop of the stakeholder should be conducted to assess their views.
240
3.2 FRAMEWORK FOR SCHEMES
3.2.1. Provision of Shelter Including up gradation & Construction of New Houses (on site improvement)
3.2.1.1. HOUSEHOLD DETAILS
Sl. No. Description Details 1. No. of Household to be covered 272 2. Average household area 25.40 Sq.m.
3.2.1.2. LAND REQUIREMENTS
Sl. No. Description Details LAND DETAILS UNIT IN HECTARES
Total area of land to be used in Existing Proposed Total 1. the Project ---- 6909 6909
Details about the ownership of Government Private Others 2. the Land √ -- -- Note:
Land acquisition cost will not be financed except for the acquisition of the private land for schemes / projects in the North Eastern States and hilly states, viz Himachal Pradesh, Uttaranchal and Jammu and Kashmir.
Existing and proposed layout of the slum cluster should be submitted.
241
3.2.1.3. CEILING COST OF THE DWELLING UNIT Sl. Dwelling Unit Details Dwelling Unit Cost No. New Improvement Total Construction 1. * Cost per dwelling Unit 92,000 92,000 2. Government Contribution 46,000 46,000 3. Beneficiaries Contribution 34,960 34,960 Any other Contribution 4. 11,040 11,040 from other sources TOTAL 92,000 92,000 What is the percentage contribution of 5. 12 % 12 % beneficiaries of total contribution Total number of dwelling 6. 272 250,24,000 unit to be constructed Note : 1) Details of the Construction based on the estimates should be submitted. 2) Ceiling cost of the dwelling unit will be @ of Rs. 92,000 per unit includes internal w/s, sanitation, electricity etc. for cities other than those covered under the Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission (JnNURM). 3) For Special category / hilly states and difficult far flung areas, 12.5 % additionally will be permissible over and above the prescribed ceiling cost per dwelling unit. 4) A minimum of 12% beneficiaries contributions should be stipulated, which in the case of SC / ST/ OBC/ PH and other weaker section shall be 10% 3.2.1.4. Details of the Dwelling Unit Sl. Description No. Dwelling Unit Details ------Proposed area of the 1. 25.40 Sq.m. dwelling unit Number of rooms 2. proposed to be made per Two Rooms dwelling unit Density of proposed 3. 91 % houses Ground coverage of 4. 95 % proposed housing complex Area under Roads / green 5. 3% area Note 1) Please attach the detailed housing plans. 2) Minimum floor area of the dwelling unit should not be less than 25 Sq.mtrs. Area and preferably two room accommodation plus kitchen and toilet should be constructed. 3) Housing should be in configuration of G+2 / G+3 (Ground + 2 Floors or Ground + 3 Floors) 4) Local Municipal Bye laws should be followed and plans should be approved by the concerned authority.
242
3.2.1.5 Type of Material to be Used for Houses
Sl. No. Description Details
Type of Material used in housing 1. construction for low cost housing Brick, Sand, Stone, Cement & Steel (provide details) Local material that may be used in 2. “ housing (provide details)
3.2.1.5 Tenure Details
Sl. No. Description Details
Land tenure ship should be secured by 1. PATTA giving patta etc. – elaborate Details of the beneficiaries contribution 2. -- for land / DUs ownership Area of the plot / DUs to be allotted by 3. -- the Government to the beneficiaries Details of the conditions to be imposed 4. -- on beneficiaries at the time of allotment Male 5. Details of legal heir of the property Female Joint Name (Special Cases Only) Nil Nil Nil Note:
Title of the land should be preferably in the name of the name of the wife and alternatively jointly in the names of husband and wife. In exceptional cases, title in the name of male beneficiary may be permitted.
243
4. PROVISIONS OF COMMUNITY TOILETS/BATHS (Under this schemes construction and development of toilets complexes including bathing facilities for men and women will be considered.) Note: This scheme is only applicable in that slum up gradation sites where the houses are not having individual toilets. 4.1 PROVISIONS OF COMMUNITY TOILETS
S.No. Community involvement Yes No 1 Tendering process √ -- a Contractor √ -- b Department work - √ 2 Consultation with the community in location of the toilets √ -- 3 Consultation with the community consultation in designing √ -- 4 Consultation with the community in construction of the toilet √ -- 5 Consultation with the community in maintenance of the √ -- toilets 6 Social mobilization of the community ensured √ -- 7 Beneficiaries participation to be ensured √ -- 8 Is there any provision of design of different toilets for women √ -- and child 9 What percentage of population is covered with sewerage 88.80 % -- system 10 What percentage of population is covered with septic tank -- -- 11 What is the provision for remaining population -- -- 12 Number of families served with one community toilet -- --
4.2 POPULATION COVERED BY EXISTING AND PROPOSED TOILET COMPLEXES UNDER VARIOUS PROGRAMMES S.No. Toilet Complexes Population % covered 1 Population covered by existing toilet complexes - - 2 Population to be covered by the toilets proposed - - under the scheme 3 Population to be covered by toilet complexes - - proposed under other projects 4 Number of households covered with one - - community toilets 5 Population covered by private and individual - - toilets 6 Others - - Total - -
244
4.3 COST OF THE PROJECT S.No. DETAILS NUMBER COST 1 No. of community toilets to be constructed - - 2 Cost of one such community toilets - - 3 Total cost of all community toilets - -
5. PROVISION OF PHYSICAL AMENITIES
(Under this scheme access to safe water supply, sewerage, storm water drains, solid waste collection, widening and paving of internal roads and street lights will be considered) 5.1 ACCESS TO SAFE WATER
S.NO DESCRIPTION DETAILS 1 Total supply of water per day 7,76,000 lpcd 2 Supply from various sources Population Percentage served 750 13.05% Municipal taps 10 13.05% Hand pumps 2 2.60% Other sources P.P. 5 13.05% 3 Per capita supply 70 Litres 4 Duration of Supply (hrs) 2 hrs 5 Population covered (%) 58 % 6 Project Cost A Separate Project for revamping entire city level distribution network. Hence no proposal is proposed. 7 Present cost of water supply (user charges) Rs. 412/- per year
8 Revenue generation for sustainable W/S ---
9 Fund required and cost sharing mechanism 50 % Govt. of India 50 % State Govt. 10 Scheme for existing/proposed water recycling and -- harvesting Note: Detail cost estimate to be submitted based on Schedule of Rates --
5.2 SEWERAGE S.NO DESCRIPTION DETAILS 1 Water supplied klt/day 2518 2 Sewer Generated 80% of the w/s 2010
3 Proposed No. of sewer connections 2500 Individual 2500 community 2 Nos. 4 Proposed Length of sewer (km’s) -
245
Septic tanks - 1 Proposed no of septic tank at the household level - 2 Proposed number of Community septic tanks - Note: Detail cost estimate to be submitted based on Schedule of - Rates
5.3 STROM WATER DRAINS S.NO DESCRIPTION DETAILS Existing Proposed Length (km’s) - -
Length of road (km’s) 0.80km -
Coverage of system*(%) - -
Note: Detail cost estimate to be submitted based on Schedule of Rates
5.4 SOLID WASTE
S.NO DESCRIPTION DETAILS 1 Total Waste Generated 2.56 MT 2 Total Waste Collected 2.21 MT 3 Management of waste A Separate Project for to entire city is prepare under JNNURM. Note: Detail cost estimate to be submitted based on Schedule of Rates
5.5 WASTE COLLECTION
S.No TYPES OF WASTE COLLECTION EXISTING PROPOSED POINTS
1 Waste Depots (dhalao) -- -- 2 Dustbins -- -- 3 R.C. container -- -- 4 Total -- -- Note: Detail cost estimate to be submitted based on Schedule of Rates
246
5.6 WIDENING AND PAVING OF INTERNAL ROADS
S.No DESCRIPTION EXISTING PROPOSED 1 Length of roads -- -- 2 Kachha -- -- 3 Pacca -- -- Note: Detail cost estimate to be submitted based on Schedule of Rates
5.7 STREET LIGHTS
S.No DESCRIPTION EXISTING PROPOSED 1 Street Lights SVL =7 Nos SVL =1 No (one per 30 mts of road length) TL =21 Nos TL =11 Nos Note: Detail cost estimate to be submitted based on Schedule of Rates 6. COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURES LIKE PROVISION OF COMMUNITY CENTERS
S.No COMMUNITY CENTRE DETAILS IN SQ MTS EXISTING PROPOSED 1 Area exiting/proposed for the community -- -- center 2 Number of rooms existing/ proposed in the -- -- community center 3 Size of the room existing /proposed in the -- -- community center 4 Size of toilets existing/proposed in the -- -- community center Note: Detail cost estimate to be submitted along with the detailed plan of building to be constructed or upgraded
247
6.1 COMMUNITY PRIMARY HEALTH CARE CENTRE BUILDINGS/ COMMUNITY HALL
S. BUILDING DETAILS EXISTING PROPOSED No Number Populati Number Populatio on served n served 1 Number of Primary Health Centre/ 1 No. 5750 -- -- Facility available 2 Number of rooms for the primary health 8 NOS ------centre 3 Toilets facilities available YES 5750 -- --
4 Population served by the community -- -- 1 NO 5750 centers/ hall Note: Location of the Health centers in the overall layout plan to be shown Plan of the existing /proposed health centre Detail cost estimate to be submitted along with the detailed plan of building to be constructed or upgraded
6.2 MATERNITY CENTRE
S.No Building Detail EXISTING PROPOSED
Populati Populatio n Number Number on served served 1 Area of the maternity centre (Sq.mts) ------
2 Number of rooms in the maternity centre ------
3 Size of the room in the maternity centre ------4 Number of toilets in the maternity centre ------Note: Location of the Maternity centers in the overall layout plan to be shown Plan of the existing /proposed health centre Detail cost estimate to be submitted along with the detailed plan of building to be constructed or upgraded
248
7. SOCIAL AMENITIES
7.1 PRESCHOOL EDUCATION
S.No DESCRIPTION EXISTING PROPOSED
Number Populati Number Populatio n on served served
1 Facilities for preschool education ------2 Population served ------Note: Detail cost estimate to be submitted based on Schedule of Rates
7.2 NONFORMAL EDUCATION
S.No DESCRIPTION EXISTING PROPOSED
Number Populati Number Populatio n on served served
1 Facilities for nonformal education ------2 Population served ------Note: Detail cost estimate to be submitted based on Schedule of Rates
7.3 ADULT EDUCATION
S.No DESCRIPTION EXISTING PROPOSED
Number Population Number Population served served
1 Facilities for adult education - - - - 2 Population served - - - - Note: Detail cost estimate to be submitted based on Schedule of Rates
7.4 AGANWADI/ CRECHES
S.No DESCRIPTION EXISTING PROPOSED
Number Populati Number Populatio n on served served
1 Facilities for aganwadi/creches ------2 Population served ------Note: Detail cost estimate to be submitted based on Schedule of Rates
249
7.5 PARKS AND PLAYGROUND
S.No DESCRIPTION EXISTING PROPOSED
Number Populati Number Populatio n on served served
1 Park and playground in the area ------2 Population served ------Note: Detail cost estimate to be submitted based on Schedule of Rates
7.6 LIVELIHOOD SUPPORT PROGRAMMES
S.No DESCRIPTION EXISTING PROPOSED
Number Populati Number Populatio n on served served
1 Saving and credit programmes ------2 Training programmes ------3 Income generation programmes through ------other means Note: Detail out all the NGOs/CBOs scheme being done in the livelihood support programmes
8. PROJECT DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 8.1 Public private partnership in housing and infrastructure development S.No Public Private Partnership Mechanism 1 Identification of the need for public private ---- partnership 2 Any information for initiating the partnership -- 3 Define the objective of the particular project and ---- the necessity of partnership 4 Information on the particular project -- 5 Identification Constraints in the partnership and its -- rectifications 6 Defining Parameters for the particular project -- 7 What kind of Financing Mechanism is being -- worked out in the project 8 How will the cost be recovered or sustained in the -- project 9 What kind of tendering and Procurement -- mechanism is being worked out 10 Explain the Monitoring & Evaluation mechanism -- in the project Note: Elaborate the steps in the public private partnership model to be implemented at the slum cluster level
250
9. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SCHEME
INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK FOR PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK FOR PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION 1 Is the organization employing external agency for -- project support consultant ( provide details) 2 Name of the local agencies for project implementation Madurai Corporation (provide details) 3 Tendering committee to be involved in the project Council (provide details)
10. MANAGEMENT OF THE PROJECT MANAGEMENT OF THE PROJECT 1 CEO/ Chief of the local bodies Commissioner
2 Project Director Commissioner
3 Project ImplementationHeaded by EE/AE ( Superintending Engineer institutional flow chart to be developed) E.E., A.E.E., & A.E., / J.E.,
11. RESOURCE MOBILIZATION AND BUDGETARY ALLOCATION SOURCES OF FINANCES RESOURCE MOBILIZATION AND BUDGETARY ALLOCATION 1 What is the ULBs own resources contribution in the - project envisaged 2 State Government contribution in the project 50%
3 Beneficiaries Contribution in the project -
4 Central Government agencies contribution in the 50% project 5 ESCROW account to be maintained or any other - mechanism for transparency and better management and utilization of funds 6 What kind of State Guarantee mechanism to be - developed 7 Any Other --
Note: Detail out all the resource mobilization and budgetary allocation in the project
251
12. MONITORING MECHANISM
Monitoring Mechanism
Internal mechanism 1 Utilization of the fund a model to be developed Corporation
2 Project completion cycle to be based on PERT/CPM Corporation
3 Progress reporting developed for the project Corporation
External mechanism CMA 1 What are the various step taken for evaluation by the -- monitoring agency 2
13. REVIEWING DEVELOPMENT ONES IN TWO TO THREE YEARS TO ACCOMMODATE/ ADJUST THE ONGOING CHANGES IN THE SOCIETY/ CITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES
Reviewing development 1 Reviewing committee and its composition (submit the -- composition that has bee envisaged in the project) 2 Feedback to be sent to the management / State -- Government ( indicate the mechanism developed by the state to give feedback about the project) 3 Restructuring implementation programme on basis of -- feedback (indicate the ways in which the programme may be restructured after getting the feedback)
14. REFORMS
S.No PROJECT REFORMS 1 What steps have been taken for improvement in urban Under JNNURM governance? 2 What mandatory reforms have been taken up for smooth Under JNNURM functioning of the project. 3 What optional reforms have been taken up for smooth Under JNNURM functioning of the project? 4 What sate level reforms have been taken up for smooth functioning of the project? Under JNNURM 5 Have the agency gone into the agreement for Memorandum of Agreement (MoA) with the Government of India Under JNNURM committing to implement the reform programme.
Note: The States/ULBs need to choose at least two Optional Reforms each year for implementation. The details of reforms which have been implemented and/or proposed to be taken up should be included in the detailed project reports.
252
15. TOTAL PROJECT COST
S.No PROJECT COST
1 What is the total cost of the project selected 257.89 a 1st Project selected 6.25 b 2nd Project selected 250.24 c 3rd Project selected 1.40 d 4th Project selected - Total Cost 257.89
16. PROJECT CONTRIBUTIONS
S.No PROJECT CONTRIBUTION
1 Central 128.945 2 State 98.915 3 ULBs 30.03 4 Others - Total 257.89
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
ABSTRACT ESTIMATE
QTY DETAILS OF WORKS RATE UNIT AMOUNT
72m3 1) Earth work excavation in all 444.30 10m3 3199.00 kinds of soils except hard rock requiring blasting, inclusive of shoring, shutting and baling out water wherever necessary etc. complete. 44m3 2) Supplying and filling in 386.70 1m3 17015.00 foundation and basement with river sand in layers of 15cm thick well rammed and consolidated including watering complying with std specification etc. complete. 9m3 3) Cement concrete 1:5:10(one 1505.75 1m3 13552.00 cement five sand and ten aggregates) using 40mm gauge hard broken granite jelly for foundation inc. consolidation and dewatering for foundation wherever necessary etc. complete. 39m3 4) Cement concrete 1:2:4 [one 2663.70 1m3 103884.00 cement two sand and ten aggregates] using 20mm machine broken gauge granite chips for rein forced cement concrete 190m2 5) Supplying and erecting 1778.00 10m2 33782.00 shuttering with necessary supports for plinth beam with all cross bracings etc. complete. [R.C.C Column footing plinth beam and lintel side] 120m2 6) Supplying and erecting centering 2163.80 10m2 25966.00 for sides and soffits supports for plain surface such as reinforced cement slab, rectangular beams, tee or ell beams, lintels, bed blocks, stain and landing beams, beams, canopy etc., complete in all any height. [The retrieved materials should be taken back contractor] The payment for centering shall be given after the laid [bottom only]
38m3 7) Brick work in CM 1:5 [one 1947.35 1m3 73999.00
261
ABSTRACT ESTIMATE
QTY DETAILS OF WORKS RATE UNIT AMOUNT
cement five sand] using 2nd class bricks in ground floor super structure 7m3 8) Brick work in CM 1:5 [one 1982.55 1m3 13878.00 cement five sand] using 2nd class bricks in first floor super structure 2m3 9) Brick work in CM 1:5 [one 2574.99 1m3 5150.00 cement five sand] using 2nd class bricks in ground floor 70m2 10) Flooring concrete1: 5:10[one 1505.75 10m2 10540.00 cement five sand and ten aggregates] using 40mm gauge hard broken granite jelly for flooring 10cm thick and top left rough to receive a floor finish etc. complete. 70m2 11) Plastering CM 1:3[one cement 1205.40 10m2 8438.00 three sand] using 20mm thick etc., complete. 550m2 12) Plastering CM1: 5[one cement 546.90 10m2 30080.00 five sand] using 12mm thick etc. complete. 125m2 13) Finishing the exposed surface 622.45 10m2 7781.00 of RCC with plastering in CM 1:3[one cement and three sand] 10mm thick. 6.50m3 14) Weathering course 80mm thick 924.000 1m3 6006.00 with concrete broken brick jelly with 20mm size in pure slacked lime (on sand) over roof slab the preparing of brick jelly lime being 32cft 121/2 well beaten with wooden beaten to the required slope and thickness. 81m2 15) Finishing the top of weathering 256.10 1m2 20744.00 course of pressed tiles 20cm x 20cm x220mm size laid in CM 1:3 [one cement three sand] mixed with crude oil 10 % by weight of cement used thepointing the same oil mortar etc
262
ABSTRACT ESTIMATE
QTY DETAILS OF WORKS RATE UNIT AMOUNT
10m2 16) Fabrication and supply and 1015.00 1m2 10150.00 fixing of steel door made out of 40 x 40 x 6mm M.S angle section outer frame and shutter made out of 35 x 35 x 6 mm M.S angle section with necessary stiffeners 32 x 6 mm and flats at 30cm intervals and necessary cross diagonals M.S flats. The shutter frame shall be fully covered by 18G cc sheet and provided with required locking facilities and hinges including cost of red oxideprimer 18m2 17) Fabrication supply and 1450.00 1m2 26100.00 delivery of steel windows of required size made out of special steel section of z angles for all- round outer frame and inner 2nos. of I mullion f4b section bars and safety bars in 12mm M.S.square bars at 12.50cm c/c And provided required hinges locking wind appliances fitting clamps and glassing 4mm pin headed glasses as per instructions and finished with one coat of red oxide paint etc complete. 1m2 18) Fabrication and delivery of 770.00 1m2 770.00 following size of ventilotor with z angles frame all-round outer and inner 25x 25x3mm L angles T glassing section spring latches fitting clamps 4mm pin heated glasses with one coat of red cxide paint etc 3m2 19) Providing zinc sheet shutters 72.97 0.10m2 219.00 with cw frames 3” x 11/2 10 gauge styles and 3” x ½ rails including all furniture fitting etc 50m2 20) Painting two coats on new 765.00 10m2 3825.00 wall surface with best synthetic
263
ABSTRACT ESTIMATE
QTY DETAILS OF WORKS RATE UNIT AMOUNT
enamel paint of approved colour and quality etc. complete. 50m2 21) Painting two coats on new 490.20 10m2 2451.00 ironwork with best synthetic enamel paint of approved colour and quality etc. complete. 200m2 22) Distempering two coats with 284.00 10m2 5680.00 best oiled bound distemper of approved colour and quality etc. complete. 140m2 23) White washing two coats with 60.40 10m2 846.00 best lime stone including gum and conjee water etc. complete. 50m2 24) Colour washing two coats with 90.65 10m2 453.00 best lime stone including gum and conjee water etc. complete. 270m2 25) Painting two coats with best 314.50 10m2 8492.00 cement paint of approved colour and quality cleaning preparing the surface and curing etc. complete. 3 RM 26) Supplying laying and jointing 133.13 1 RM 399.00 in position of 150mmdia (6”dia) SWpipes including filling the joints with spur yarn neat cement curing etc. complete. 20 RM 27) Supplying laying and jointing 81.13 1 RM 1623.00 in position of 100mmdia (4”dia) SWpipes including filling the joints with spur yarn neat cement curing etc. complete. 40 Nos. 28) Wiring with 2 x 2.50 sq.mm 383.99 1 point 15360.00 PVC unsheathed sc alu. Cable of 650V grade in suitable PVC rigid pipe on wall and ceiling with PVC accessories and with T.W. switch box with painting of suitable colour with continuous earth wire connection of 14SWG TC Wire for open PVC light point 25 Nos. 29) Supplying and fixing of single 303.60 EACH 7590.00 box type 4’40 w flu. Fitting complete with copper choke and
264
ABSTRACT ESTIMATE
QTY DETAILS OF WORKS RATE UNIT AMOUNT
condenser with tube light. 10 Nos. 30) Supplying and fixing of 48” 959.90 1 point 9599.00 best make ceiling fan 3750kg 31) Supplying fabricating and 33.90 1kg 127125.00 placing of MS grills for reinforcement rate inc. the cost of steel for all works. The rate to include cost of binding wire also. 2Nos. 32) Providing water closet 580mm 969.00 EACH 1938.00 size orissa type Indian make with (p) Trap including fixing a pair of foot rests over a bed of brick jelly concrete in LM 1:2 using 40mm broken brick jelly 100mm thick and top plastered with CM 1:3 [one cement three sand] 20mm thick etc. complete [including] cost of water closet foot rests and trap each. [Co lour] L.S. 33) Provisions for new service connection including costs of all electrical accessories - - 6000.00 L.S. 34) Provisions for water supply arrangements - - 4000.00 L.S. 35) Provisions for building elevation work cost of all materials and labour charges etc - - 8000.00 L.S. 36) Provisions for fencing arrangements - - 6000.00 L.S. 37) Unforeseen works - - 4366.00 Total 6,25,000.00 Station : MADURAI [office in charge]…………………… Dated :…………………………. [Designation] : JE (South) Technically sanctioned for Rs 6,25,000.00 Administrative sanction accorded [Six Lakhs and Twanty Five Thousand Rupees Only] and registered as C.E’s No…………………………….Ordinary for Rs 6,25,000.00 Capital
Asst. Exe. Engineer, Exe. Engineer, Commissioner, Madurai Corporation. Madurai Corporation. Madurai
265
Madurai Corporation Detailed Estimate Name of Work : Construction of Dwelling unit Sl. Description of work No L B D Contents Total No 1 Earthwork excavation in all soil for foundation with initial lead and lift in all soils and sub soils to the required depth as directed by the departmental officers etc complete as per standard specifications. Wall all round 1x1 19.58 0.90 1.00 17.62 Room cross portion 1x1 4.43 0.90 1.00 3.98 Portion WC Bath 0.40 22.00 22 m3
2 Supply and filling river sand including cost of all materials and and all labour charges etc., complete complying with standard specification etc., Wall all round 1x1 19.58 0.90 0.10 1.76 Room cross portion 1x1 4.43 0.90 0.10 0.40 2.16 2 m3
3 Cement concrete with hard boken grnite stone jelly using 40mm gauge in cement concrete 1:5:10 (One cement five sand and ten aggregate) for foundation includidng cost and conveyance of all materials and all other incidental charges etc., complete complying with standard specifications. Wall all round 1x1 19.58 0.75 0.15 2.64 Room cross portion 1x1 4.43 0.75 0.15 0.59 Flooring 1x2 2.45 2.45 0.10 1.20 1x2 2.45 1.53 0.10 0.75 0.82 6.00 6 m3 4 Random rubble masonry in cement mortar 1 : 5 (One cement and five sand) for foundation and basement using new stones including simultaneous pointing of the exposed surface and all incidental charges such as baling out water, scaffolding curing, finishing etc., complete complying with standard specification
Wall all round 1x1 19.58 0.45 0.50 10.13 Room cross portion 1x1 4.43 0.45 1.15 2.29 0.58 13.00 13 m3
5 Brick work in cement mortar 1 : 5 ( one cement and five sand ) using chamber bricks of size 8 3/4 " x 4 1/4 " 2 3/4 " for the following items including curing etc complete complying with standard specificatin.
266
Wall all round 1x1 19.58 0.23 2.10 9.45 Room Portion 1x1 3.50 0.12 2.10 1.06 WC & Bath 1x1 2.45 0.12 2.10 0.62 (P) Door 1x2 0.90 0.23 2.10 0.87 (-) 1x2 0.70 0.23 2.10 0.68 (-) Window 1x1 0.90 0.23 0.90 0.19 (-) 1x4 1.20 0.23 1.20 1.32 (-) Ventilators 1x2 0.60 0.23 0.90 0.24 (-) All round 1x1 19.58 0.23 0.75 3.38 Portion room 1x1 4.20 0.12 0.75 0.37 WC & Bath 1x1 2.45 0.12 0.75 0.21 0.44 10 m3 10 m3
6 Providing centring shuttering to all RCC works in all materirals and all labour charges etc.. complete complying with standard specification.
Lintel 1x6 1.20 0.00 0.00 1.44 Roof 1x1 20.50 0.00 0.00 2.05 1x1 5.13 4.20 0.00 20.58 4.07 (-) 20.00 20 m2
7 Supplying and fabricating of Steel Including cost all works inclusive of 1x1 4 m3 x70 280.00 cost of Steel ( the rate included cost of binding wire also ) including kg cost of all materials and all labour charges etc.. completed complying with standard specification.
280.00 280 kg 8 Reinforced cement concrete 1:2:4 (One cement two sand four aggregate ) for all RCC works using 20 %mm gauge hard broken stone jelly excluding cost of reinforcement grill in position shuttering and centring but including laying curinglaying curing etc., complete complying with standard Lintel 1x1 19.58 0.45 0.08 0.66 Roof 1x1 19.58 0.23 0.15 0.68 1x1 5.59 4.66 0.10 2.60 0.06 4.00 4 m3
9 Supplying and fabricating and placing in position MS or RTS grill for reimbursement of all works inclusive of cost of steel ( the rate included cost of binding wire also) including cost of all materials and all labour charges etc complete complying with standard specification. Door 1x2 0.90 2.10 0.00 3.78 Door 1x2 0.75 2.10 0.00 3.15
267
Window 1x1 0.90 0.90 0.00 0.81 Window 1x4 1.20 1.20 0.00 5.76 Ventilator 1x2 0.60 0.90 0.00 1.08 0.42 15.00 100 kg
10 Plastering with cement mortar 1:4 (one cement four sand) 20 mm thick including finishing the surface cost and conveyance of all materials mixing curing and all other incidental charges etc., complete complying with standard specification. All round out side 1x1 20.50 -- 3.85 78.92 Door 2x2 0.90 -- 2.10 7.56 (-) Window 1x2 0.90 -- 0.90 1.62 (-) Window 2x4 1.20 -- 1.20 11.52 (-)
Inner side Kitchen room 1x1 7.96 -- 3.00 23.88 Room 1x2 9.80 -- 3.00 58.80 Open 1x2 0.70 -- 3.00 4.20 (-) WC 1x2 5.06 -- 3.00 30.36 Bath 1x1 1.53 -- 3.00 4.59 Ventilator 1x3 0.60 -- 0.90 1.62 (-) 3.99 120.00 120 m2
11 White washing Plastering inner side are 1x1 ------40.00 40 m2
12 Colour washing two coats and plastering outside area 1x1 ------80.00 80 m2
13 Contigences Other Items including water closet Leeach bit - LS -
268
269
MADURAI CORPORATION ABSTRACT Name of Work : Construction of dewelling Unit S.No Qty Description of Items Rate Per Amount 1 22 m3 Earthwork excavation in all soil for foundation with initial 44.30 m3 975.00 lead and lift in all soils and sub soils to the required depth as directed by the departmental officers etc complete as per standard specifications. 2 2 m3 Supply and filling river sand including cost of all materials and 386.70 m3 773.00 and all labour charges etc., complete complying with standard specification etc., 3 6 m3 Cement concrete with hard boken grnite stone jelly 1505.70 m3 9034.00 using 40mm gauge in cement concrete 1:5:10 (One cement five sand and ten aggregate) for foundation includidng cost and conveyance of all materials and all other incidental charges etc., complete complying with standard specifications. 4 13 m3 Random rubble masonry in cement mortar 1 : 5 (One 1349.80 m3 17547.40 cement and five sand) for foundation and basement using new stones including simultaneous pointing of the exposed surface and all incidental charges such as baling out water, scaffolding curing, finishing etc., complete complying with standard specification
5 10 m3 Brick work in cement mortar 1 : 5 ( one cement and five sand 2149.10 m3 21491.00 ) using chamber bricks of size 8 3/4 " x 4 1/4 " 2 3/4 " for the following items including curing etc complete complying with standard specificatin. 6 20 m2 Providing centring shuttering to all RCC works in all materirals 216.40 m2 4328.00 and all labour charges etc.. complete complying with standard specification. 7 280 kg Supplying and fabricating of Steel Including cost all works 33.75 kg 9338.00 inclusive of cost of Steel ( the rate included cost of binding wire also ) including cost of all materials and all labour charges etc.. completed complying with standard specification.
8 4 m3 Reinforced cement concrete 1:2:4 2684.40 m3 10738.00 (One cement two sand four aggregate ) for all RCC works using 20 %mm gauge hard broken stone jelly excluding cost of reinforcement grill in position shuttering and centring but including laying curinglaying curing etc., complete complying with standard 9 100 kg Supplying and fixing of steel door and window including cost of 37.00 kg 3700.00 steel fabrication and fixing charges etc., complete 10 120 m2 Plastering with cement mortar 1:5 (one cement 54.70 m2 6564.00 five sand) 20 mm thick including finishing the
270
surface cost and conveyance of all materials mixing curing and all other incidental charges etc., complete complying with standard specification. 11 40 m2 White washing two coat using best shell lime including cost best shell lime and labour charges etc., complete 6.04 m2 242.00 12 80 m2 Colour washing two coats using best shell lime including cost of all materials and labour charges etc., complete 9.10 m2 718.00 13 - LS - Provision for Electrification Water Closet & RWH Structure 6551.60 TOTAL 92000.00 (Rupees Ninety Two Thousand only)
271
Madurai Corporation
Phase I - Abstract for 21 Slums
Housing Water supply Road SWD Community Hall Street Light Noon Meal Center Community Toilet
Ward Sl. No. Name of the Slum Total No. Existing Existing Propo Existing Proposal Propo Exist Propo Exis Propo Exis Propo Exis Prop Exis Propo Amountsal Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount Thatche sal ing sal ting sal ting sal ting osal ting sal RCC Asbotus HSC PF PP SVL TL SVL TL d 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 1 V.V GIRI SALAI 41 5 18 67 60 55.20 2 2 ------0.90 8.90 -- _ -- -- _ _ 5 6 1 26 0.48 -- _ -- _ -- -- 64.58 POWER HOUSE 2 40 36 32 62 50 46.00 15 2 ------0.85 23.20 -- 0.85 59.60 -- -- _ 5 6 1 53 0.60 ------129.40 ROAD 3 THIDEER NAGAR 31 346 116 303 272 250.24 68 10 ------1 6.25 7 2 1 1 1.40 ------257.89
4 HEERA NAGAR 31 39 8 186 10 9.20 45 7 ------0.74 99.00 ------16 9 5 1 0.76 ------108.96
5 FF ROAD 43 2 93 40 98 90.16 4 7 ------0.39 4.99 ------_ 5 6 1 1 0.48 ------95.63
6 INDIRA NAGAR 64 24 3 63 44 40.48 30 30 2 3.00 ------_ 1 5 1 8 0.64 ------44.12 MEENAMBIGAI 7 64 134 22 80 25 23.00 120 41 ------0.3 11.50 -- -- _ 13 82 5 -- 0.68 ------35.18 NAGAR SOLAI 8 60 79 223 145 227 208.84 110 2 ------1.9 23.20 -- -- _ 5 6 1 1 0.48 ------232.52 ALAGUPURAM HANUMAR KOIL 9 35 38 121 114 172 158.24 20 4 ------_ 6 9 3 2 0.44 -- 2 1.50 ------160.18 PADITHURAI 10 CHETTITHOPPU 35 30 32 100 162 149.04 20 ------0.51 24.30 -- -- 23.20 -- -- _ 6 9 8 10 0.84 ------197.38
11 MUTHUPATTI 65 138 177 401 293 269.56 15 6 ------0.5 17.00 -- -- _ 3 12 6 10 1.52 ------288.08 KOVALAN 12 64 173 65 190 144 132.48 100 7 ------0.62 21.00 -- -- _ 8 34 28 11 4.36 ------157.84 NAGAR IRULAPPASAMY 13 59 63 104 110 146 134.32 5 9 ------0.11 6.90 ------_ -- 4 -- 9 0.06 ------141.28 KOIL STREET THOMATTI 14 RENGASAMY 50 20 30 130 150 138.00 -- 20 ------_ 11 7 -- 10 0.06 ------1 1 5.50 143.56 STREET VILLAPURAM 15 59 15 20 50 66 60.72 85 1 ------_ 12 3 -- 12 0.06 ------1 1 5.50 66.28 MAIN STREET EAST MADURAI 16 HARIJAN 55 217 50 30 80 73.60 30 4 1 1.50 ------_ 5 15 -- 7 0.48 ------75.58 COLONY KAMARAJA 17 56 822 128 125 253 232.76 20 110 1 1.50 ------_ 10 5 2 10 0.16 ------234.42 PURAM NAGUPILLAI 18 57 215 50 24 74 68.08 50 8 1 1.50 ------_ 6 25 -- 5 0.06 ------69.64 THOPPU 19 INDIRA NAGAR 57 662 31 30 61 56.12 100 30 1 1.50 ------_ 8 29 2 9 0.28 ------57.90
SHANTHI NAGAR AND 20 58 21 31 47 78 71.76 20 9 -- -- 0.25 -- -- 0.3 ------1 5.60 4 11 2 5 0.60 ------77.96 THAYUMANASA MY NAGAR HARIJAN 21 59 2 41 22 50 46.00 5 2 1 1.50 0.13 -- -- 0.1 ------_ -- 5 -- 1 0.06 ------47.56 COLONY Housing Water supply Road SWD Community Hall Street Light Noon Meal Center Community Toilet
Ward Sl. No. Name of the Slum Total No. Existing Existing Propo Existing Proposal Propo Exist Propo Exis Propo Exis Propo Exis Prop Exis Propo Amountsal Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount Thatche sal ing sal ting sal ting sal ting osal ting sal RCC Asbotus HSC PF PP SVL TL SVL TL d 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 TOTAL -- 4209 1395 2319 2515 2313.80 864 311 7 10.50 0.38 2.76 68.29 0.38 4.91 254.50 -- 2 11.85 136 290 67 192 14.50 -- 2 1.50 2 2 11.00 2685.94 Madurai Corporation
Abstract for 21 Slums - Central, State & Beneficiary Contribution
New Construction Cost for Infrastructure Improvement Total
Sl. Ward Name of the Slum Total Cost Central Govt. State Govt. Beneficiary Central State Govt. Central State Govt. Beneficiar Total No. No. Total Share Share Share Govt. Share Share Govt. Share Share y Share Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount No Amount
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1 V.V GIRI SALAI 41 60 55.20 27.60 20.98 6.62 9.38 4.69 4.69 32.29 25.67 6.62 64.58
2 POWER HOUSE ROAD 40 50 46.00 23.00 17.48 5.52 83.40 41.70 41.70 64.70 59.18 5.52 129.40
3 THIDEER NAGAR 31 272 250.24 125.12 95.09 30.03 7.65 3.825 3.825 128.95 98.92 30.03 257.89
4 HEERA NAGAR 31 10 9.20 4.60 3.50 1.10 99.76 49.88 49.88 54.48 53.38 1.10 108.96
5 FF ROAD 43 98 90.16 45.08 34.26 10.82 5.47 2.735 2.735 47.82 37.00 10.82 95.63
6 INDIRA NAGAR 64 44 40.48 20.24 15.38 4.86 3.64 1.82 1.82 22.06 17.20 4.86 44.12
7 MEENAMBIGAI NAGAR 64 25 23.00 11.50 8.74 2.76 12.18 6.09 6.09 17.59 14.83 2.76 35.18
8 SOLAI ALAGUPURAM 60 227 208.84 104.42 79.36 25.06 23.68 11.84 11.84 116.26 91.20 25.06 232.52 HANUMAR KOIL 9 35 172 158.24 79.12 60.13 18.99 1.94 0.97 0.97 80.09 61.10 18.99 160.18 PADITHURAI 10 CHETTITHOPPU 35 162 149.04 74.52 56.64 17.88 48.34 24.17 24.17 98.69 80.81 17.88 197.38
11 MUTHUPATTI 65 293 269.56 134.78 102.43 32.35 18.52 9.26 9.26 144.04 111.69 32.35 288.08
12 KOVALAN NAGAR 64 144 132.48 66.24 50.34 15.90 25.36 12.68 12.68 78.92 63.02 15.90 157.84 IRULAPPASAMY KOIL 13 59 146 134.32 67.16 51.04 16.12 6.96 3.48 3.48 70.64 54.52 16.12 141.28 STREET THOMATTI 14 50 150 138.00 69.00 52.44 16.56 5.56 2.78 2.78 71.78 55.22 16.56 143.56 RENGASAMY STREET New Construction Cost for Infrastructure Improvement Total
Sl. Ward Name of the Slum Total Cost Central Govt. State Govt. Beneficiary Central State Govt. Central State Govt. Beneficiar Total No. No. Total Share Share Share Govt. Share Share Govt. Share Share y Share Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount No Amount
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 VILLAPURAM MAIN 15 59 66 60.72 30.36 23.07 7.29 5.56 2.78 2.78 33.14 25.85 7.29 66.28 STREET EAST MADURAI 16 55 80 73.60 36.80 27.97 8.83 1.98 0.99 0.99 37.79 28.96 8.83 75.58 HARIJAN COLONY 17 KAMARAJA PURAM 56 253 232.76 116.38 88.45 27.93 1.66 0.83 0.83 117.21 89.28 27.93 234.42
18 NAGUPILLAI THOPPU 57 74 68.08 34.04 25.87 8.17 1.56 0.78 0.78 34.82 26.65 8.17 69.64
19 INDIRA NAGAR 57 61 56.12 28.06 21.33 6.73 1.78 0.89 0.89 28.95 22.22 6.73 57.90
SHANTHI NAGAR AND 20 THAYUMANASAMY 58 78 71.76 35.88 27.27 8.61 6.20 3.10 3.1 38.98 30.37 8.61 77.96 NAGAR
21 HARIJAN COLONY 59 50 46.00 23.00 17.48 5.52 1.56 0.78 0.78 23.78 18.26 5.52 47.56
TOTAL 2515 2313.80 1156.90 879.24 277.66 372.14 186.07 186.07 1342.97 1065.31 277.66 2685.94 Madurai Corporation
Abstract for 21 Slums - Central, State & Beneficiary Contribution
New Construction Cost for Infrastructure Improvement Total
Sl. Ward Name of the Slum Total Cost Central State Govt. Beneficiary Central State Govt. Central State Govt. Beneficiar Total No. No. Total Govt. Share Share Share Govt. Share Share Govt. Share Share y Share Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount No Amount
1 2 345 20 1 V.V GIRI SALAI 41 60 55.20 27.60 20.98 6.62 9.38 4.69 4.69 32.29 25.67 6.62 64.58
2 POWER HOUSE ROAD 40 50 46.00 23.00 17.48 5.52 83.40 41.70 41.70 64.70 59.18 5.52 129.40
3 THIDEER NAGAR 31 272 250.24 125.12 95.09 30.03 7.65 3.825 3.825 128.95 98.92 30.03 257.89
4 HEERA NAGAR 31 10 9.20 4.60 3.50 1.10 99.76 49.88 49.88 54.48 53.38 1.10 108.96
5 FF ROAD 43 98 90.16 45.08 34.26 10.82 5.47 2.735 2.735 47.82 37.00 10.82 95.63
6 INDIRA NAGAR 64 44 40.48 20.24 15.38 4.86 3.64 1.82 1.82 22.06 17.20 4.86 44.12
7 MEENAMBIGAI NAGAR 64 25 23.00 11.50 8.74 2.76 12.18 6.09 6.09 17.59 14.83 2.76 35.18
8 SOLAI ALAGUPURAM 60 227 208.84 104.42 79.36 25.06 23.68 11.84 11.84 116.26 91.20 25.06 232.52 HANUMAR KOIL 9 35 172 158.24 79.12 60.13 18.99 1.94 0.97 0.97 80.09 61.10 18.99 160.18 PADITHURAI 10 CHETTITHOPPU 35 162 149.04 74.52 56.64 17.88 48.34 24.17 24.17 98.69 80.81 17.88 197.38
11 MUTHUPATTI 65 293 269.56 134.78 102.43 32.35 18.52 9.26 9.26 144.04 111.69 32.35 288.08
12 KOVALAN NAGAR 64 144 132.48 66.24 50.34 15.90 25.36 12.68 12.68 78.92 63.02 15.90 157.84 IRULAPPASAMY KOIL 13 59 146 134.32 67.16 51.04 16.12 6.96 3.48 3.48 70.64 54.52 16.12 141.28 STREET THOMATTI RENGASAMY 14 50 150 138.00 69.00 52.44 16.56 5.56 2.78 2.78 71.78 55.22 16.56 143.56 STREET VILLAPURAM MAIN 15 59 66 60.72 30.36 23.07 7.29 5.56 2.78 2.78 33.14 25.85 7.29 66.28 STREET EAST MADURAI HARIJAN 16 55 80 73.60 36.80 27.97 8.83 1.98 0.99 0.99 37.79 28.96 8.83 75.58 COLONY 17 KAMARAJA PURAM 56 253 232.76 116.38 88.45 27.93 1.66 0.83 0.83 117.21 89.28 27.93 234.42
18 NAGUPILLAI THOPPU 57 74 68.08 34.04 25.87 8.17 1.56 0.78 0.78 34.82 26.65 8.17 69.64
19 INDIRA NAGAR 57 61 56.12 28.06 21.33 6.73 1.78 0.89 0.89 28.95 22.22 6.73 57.90 SHANTHI NAGAR AND 20 THAYUMANASAMY 58 78 71.76 35.88 27.27 8.61 6.20 3.10 3.1 38.98 30.37 8.61 77.96 NAGAR 21 HARIJAN COLONY 59 50 46.00 23.00 17.48 5.52 1.56 0.78 0.78 23.78 18.26 5.52 47.56
TOTAL 2515 2313.80 1156.90 879.24 277.66 372.14 186.07 186.07 1342.97 1065.31 277.66 2685.94 Madurai Corporation
Phase III - Slum Details
Total Slum Sl.No. Name of J.E. / A.E. Ward No. Slum Details Remarks No.
1 1 Cylon Colony 1 Karuppiaha 15 1 Kansapuram Ramamoorhty Street, 2 Thiyagarajan 2 2 Nabigal Nayagam Street Gandhipuram, Dobi 3 Kulanthai Vel 3 3 Colony, Jawaharpuram Anthaneri, Kadachanthal, Jawaharlalpuram, Maruthankulam, 4 Baskaran 4 8 Kodikulam, Sambakulam, Sathiya Nagar, Karpaga Nagar West Muthuramalingapuram, Indira Colony, 5 Saravanan 5 4 Thiruvalluvar Colony, Burma Colony Madichiyam, Asari 6 Gritti 9 2 Thoppu 10 1 Seeni Naicker Thoppu 7 Sonai 11 1 Karumbalai 18 1 Narimedu Odai 9 Periyasamy 19 1 Meenakshipuram Odai Alavudeen Thoppu, Kaka 10 Manian 32 2 Thoppu Ganesh Nagar, Kanagavel 11 Mani 34 3 Colony, Poonthottam Old Meenakshi Mill 41 1 12 Manoharan Colony 42 1 South Shanmugapuram 13 Xavior 62 1 M.K. Puram 63 1 Janki Nagar 14 Kani 45 1 Bomban Road Total Slum Sl.No. Name of J.E. / A.E. Ward No. Slum Details Remarks No.
48 1 Ibrahimsa Thoppu 15 Muniyandi Ismailpuram 8 to 12th 49 1 Street 16 Balaiah 51 1 Kuruvikaran Salai Thoppu
17 Malika 53 1 Devikanni Street 18 Suresh Kumar 55 1 Chinnakanmai Anthoniyar Kovil Street, 19 Vijaya Kumar 24 2 Ram Nagar Padasalai 20 Maharajan 25 1 Sonaiya Kovil Thoppu 26 1 Gomaspalayam 21 Xavior 27 1 Murattam Patti 22 Ganeshan 29 1 Muniyandi Kovil Street 29 1 Ansari Nagar 23 Sekar 29 1 Chitalatchi Nagar 69 1 Rajiv Nagar 24 Alexandar Thillai Nagar, Bharathiyar 70 2 Street A.K. Gopalan Street, 25 Balamurugan 71 2 Chinnasamy Pillai Street TOTAL 53