(Part 1) – Overview and Assessment of Inherited Retinal Disease

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

FEATURE An update on inherited retinal disorders (part 1) – overview and assessment of inherited retinal disease BY STACEY STRONG, MICHEL MICHAELIDES nherited Retinal Disease (IRD) is the gene can result in varying phenotypes common inheritance pattern is autosomal leading cause of blindness certification [4], with marked inter- and intra-familial recessive (AR; 30-40%), with mutations in in the working age population (age 16-64 variability being commonplace [3]. the gene USH2A being the most common Iyears) in England and Wales and the This, together with the large number of cause [8]. AD inheritance occurs in 20-30% second most common in childhood [1]. genes that have been identified in IRDs of RP, with mutations in the Rhodopsin The term IRD incorporates a large group of (>300), can result in significant diagnostic (RHO) gene being the most common [8]. disorders that are clinically and genetically challenge. XL RP occurs in 15-20%, with mutations heterogeneous [2]. Well-characterised IRDs and those in the RP GTPase regulator (RPGR) gene IRDs may be sub-categorised in subject to / anticipated to be subject to accounting for the vast majority [8]. There several ways including: (i) according to clinical trial will be described below. is no known family history in 40-50% of photoreceptor involvement, for example, patients at presentation [9]. XLRP and rod or cone; when both are involved Retinitis pigmentosa ARRP are the most severe forms of RP with onset often in childhood. ADRP is milder the nomenclature reflects the order in Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) represents a and often of later onset. Digenic RP is rare which the photoreceptors are affected, group of disorders which are the most and is caused by disease-causing variants for example, rod-cone dystrophies affect common IRD, with an incidence of occurring in both PRPH2 and ROM1 [8]. the rods prior to the cones. Also by (ii) approximately one in 3000 in the USA RP can be isolated (most common) natural history – stationary or progressive and Europe [3,5]. RP is a clinically variable or syndromic. Examples of syndromic disorders; (iii) isolated macular or rod-cone dystrophy, characterised by RP include: Usher syndrome (RP and generalised retinal involvement; and (iv) nyctalopia, and progressive visual field loss neurosensory hearing loss), Bardet Biedl isolated ocular or additional systemic initially, with central visual involvement syndrome (RP with obesity, developmental manifestations (syndromic) [3]. later in the disease process (Figure 1). delay, polydactyly, hypogonadism and renal IRDs may be inherited in an autosomal Clinical examination is characterised abnormalities), Kearns-Sayre syndrome dominant (AD), autosomal recessive by bone-spicule retinal pigmentation, (RP with external ophthalmoplegia, ataxia (AR) or X-linked (XL) manner. IRDs are generalised vascular attenuation and optic and heart block), Abetalipoproteinemia genetically diverse and complex. While disc pallor. (RP with fat malabsorption and progressive certain phenotypes can be caused by RP is a genetically heterogeneous ataxia) and Refsum disease (RP with disease-causing sequence variants in disorder with over 60 genes currently anosmia, deafness, ataxia, neuropathy and different genes, mutations within the same known to cause RP [6,7]. The most icthyosis) [10]. The latter two syndromes can be managed with dietary modification. Multiple avenues of research are being explored in RP including gene and stem cell therapy, pharmacological approaches and artificial vision, with on-going or anticipated clinical trials [11-13]. Figure 1: OCT images centered on the macula Leber congenital amaurosis in a patient Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA) is a without RP (A) and a patient severe congenital / early-onset IRD with with RP (B). Red an incidence of three per 100,000 births arrows: intact [14]. The inheritance pattern is AR with 22 external limiting membrane; genes identified to date which account for Yellow arrows: approximately 70-80% of cases [15]. Three intact ellipsoid of the most common causative genes are: zone (IS/OS junction); Blue GUCY2D (6-21%), CEP290 (10-20%) and arrows: loss RPE65 (5-16%) [16]. of peripheral macular outer Patients present at birth or early retinal layers, infancy with severe visual impairment, with relative nystagmus and amaurotic pupils [5,16]. preservation centrally. Used Other symptoms and signs may include with permission. photoattraction or photophobia, eye news | OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2016 | VOL 23 NO 3 | www.eyenews.uk.com FEATURE nyctalopia, the oculodigital sign, compared to later onset (adulthood- The fundus appearance in ACHM keratoconus and cataract [16]. LCA can be onset STGD and foveal-sparing STGD) is often normal but RPE disturbance isolated (most common) or syndromic, [13]. Fundus appearance may be normal or atrophy at the macula can be seen e.g. Joubert and Senior-Loken syndrome. in the early stages, with development of [33]. Electrophysiological assessment Fundus examination ranges from a normal increasing macular atrophy / bull’s-eye demonstrates reduced, or absent cone appearance especially at presentation, to maculopathy, and yellow-white flecks at responses with normal rod responses. marked maculopathy, white retinal dots the level of the RPE which are associated SD-OCT findings are variable in ACHM and and bone-spicule pigment migration [16]. with characteristic areas of increased and have implications for anticipated gene Electroretinography is typically non- decreased autofluorescence (Figure 2), therapy trials; outer retinal architecture detectable or severely reduced in LCA [16]; which changes over time. Spectral-domain may be classified as: (1) continuous inner and is helpful in distinguishing between optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) segment ellipsoid (ISe), (2) ISe disruption, other causes of congenital / early-onset shows loss of outer retinal architecture at (3) absent ISe, (4) foveal hyporeflective nystagmus and reduced visual behaviour, the central macula [21]. zone (Figure 3), and (5) outer retinal including achromatopsia, congenital Electrophysiological assessment is atrophy [36]. stationary night blindness and albinism. useful for both diagnosis and, moreover, Successful rescue of multiple small and Gene therapy-based clinical trials are informing advice on prognosis: Group large animal models of CNGA3 and CNGB3 on-going or planned in the near future for 1 patients have a normal full-field ERG associated ACHM have led to on-going several genetic forms of LCA including (ffERG) in the presence of severe macular and anticipated gene replacement clinical RPE65, MERTK, CEP290, AIPL1 and GUCY2D dysfunction (pattern ERG or multifocal trials for both forms of ACHM [13,35]. [13,17,18]. ERG); Group 2 patients have generalised cone system dysfunction in addition to X-linked retinoschisis Stargardt disease macular dysfunction; and Group 3 patients X-linked retinoschisis (XLRS) affects Stargardt disease (STGD) is the most have both generalised cone and rod 1:5,000-1:20,000 [37], and is caused by common inherited macular dystrophy, system dysfunction in addition to macular disease-causing sequence variants in with a prevalence of one in 10,000 [19], and dysfunction [22,23]. Group 1 is associated the gene RS1, with over 200 variants is caused by recessive sequence variants with a better prognosis compared to Group identified to date. The encoded protein, in the ATP-binding cassette transporter 3; with Group 3 associated with a greater retinoschisin, is secreted and binds to (ABCA4) gene. STGD is characterised rate of progression, worse visual acuity and both photoreceptors and bipolar cells to by toxic accumulation of lipofuscin and loss of peripheral vision over time [22]. help maintain the integrity of the retina related products including the bis-retinoid Multiple avenues of intervention [32]. While penetrance is complete, N-retinylidene-N-retinylethanolamine are currently being explored, including clinical expression is highly variable. (A2E) within retinal pigment epithelium gene therapy, stem cell therapy and Boys typically present in the first or (RPE) cells, resulting in RPE cell pharmacological approaches, with on- second decade of life with strabismus, dysfunction / death, with subsequent going clinical trials in all three areas [13,21]. amblyopia, anisometropia, or having photoreceptor cell dysfunction / loss. failed school vision screening [32,38]. Over 900 disease-causing sequence Achromatopsia The characteristic fundus abnormality variants have been identified in ABCA4 Achromatopsia (ACHM) is an autosomal is a cystic spokewheel-like maculopathy to date, resulting in marked phenotypic recessive cone dysfunction syndrome (foveal schisis), present in about two- heterogeneity including variable age [24]. Disease-causing sequence variants thirds of males, and most readily observed of onset and severity [19,20]. Typical have been identified in five genes that with SD-OCT (Figure 4). Fifty percent of presentation occurs during the first encode components of the cone-specific affected males show additional peripheral or second decade of life with bilateral phototransduction cascade (CNGA3, retinal changes – often a (usually lower central visual loss and dyschromatopsia. CNGB3, GNAT2, PDE6C and PDE6H) temporal) peripheral retinoschisis [19]. Earlier onset (childhood-onset STGD) is [25-30], and also ATF6, which has a role Other peripheral retinal changes include associated with a worse prognosis and in the maintenance of the endoplasmic pigmentary retinopathy,
Recommended publications
  • Masqueraders of Age-Related Macular Degeneration

    Masqueraders of Age-Related Macular Degeneration

    COVER STORY Masqueraders of Age-related Macular Degeneration A number of inherited retinal diseases phenocopy AMD. BY RONY GELMAN, MD, MS; AND STEPHEN H. TSANG, MD, PHD ge-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a leading cause of central visual loss among the elderly population in the developed world. The Currently, there are no published A non-neovascular form is characterized by mac- guidelines to prognosticate ular drusen and other abnormalities of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) such as geographic atrophy (GA) and Stargardt macular degeneration. hyperpigmented areas in the macula. The neovascular form is heralded by choroidal neovascularization (CNV), with subsequent development of disciform scarring. ABCA4 defect heterozygote carrier may be as high as This article reviews the pathologic and diagnostic char- one in 20.11,12 An estimated 600 disease-causing muta- acteristics of inherited diseases that may masquerade as tions in the ABCA4 gene exist, of which the three most AMD. The review is organized by the following patterns common mutations account for less than 10% of the of inheritance: autosomal recessive (Stargardt disease and disease phenotypes.13 cone dystrophy); autosomal dominant (cone dystrophy, The underlying pathology of disease in STGD involves adult vitelliform dystrophy, pattern dystrophy, North accumulation of lipofuscin in the RPE through a process Carolina macular dystrophy, Doyne honeycomb dystro- of disc shedding and phagocytosis.14,15 Lipofuscin is toxic phy, and Sorsby macular dystrophy); X-linked (X-linked to the RPE; furthermore, A2E, a component of lipofuscin, retinoschisis); and mitochondrial (maternally inherited causes inhibition of 11-cis retinal regeneration16 and diabetes and deafness). complement activation.
  • Pediatric Anisometropia: Case Series and Review

    Pediatric Anisometropia: Case Series and Review

    Pediatric Anisometropia: tacles, vision therapy, and occlusion. Case two Case Series and Review is anisometropia caused by organic vision loss from optic neuritis early in life. Case three is John D. Tassinari OD, FAAO, FCOVD an infant with hyperopic anisometropia and Diplomate Binocular Vision esotropia. The esotropia did not respond to Perception and Pediatric Optometry, spectacles and home based vision therapy. American Academy of Optometry Neonatal high bilateral hyperopia that Associate Professor Western converted to anisometropia because of early University of Health Sciences onset cosmetically invisible unilateral esotropia College of Optometry is speculated. Case four describes a boy Pomona, California diagnosed with hyperopic anisometropia at age 11 months coincident with a diagnosis of pseudoesotropia. His compliance with ARTICLE prescribed spectacles was spotty until age three years. An outstanding visual outcome ABSTRACT was achieved by age five years with spectacles Background only (no occlusion therapy). Case five concerns The etiology and natural course and history a boy who acquired hyperopic anisometropia of pediatric anisometropia are incompletely because one eye experienced increasing understood. This article reviews the literature hyperopia during his toddler years. His regarding pediatric anisometropia with much response to treatment, spectacles and part of the review integrated into a case series. time occlusion with home vision therapy, was The review and case reports are intended to outstanding. Case six is an infant diagnosed elevate clinical understanding of pediatric with 2.50 diopters of hyperopic anisometropia anisometropia including and especially at age six months. Monocular home based treatment outcomes. vison developmental activities, not glasses, were prescribed. Her anisometropia vanished Case Reports three months later.
  • Bass – Glaucomatous-Type Field Loss Not Due to Glaucoma

    Bass – Glaucomatous-Type Field Loss Not Due to Glaucoma

    Glaucoma on the Brain! Glaucomatous-Type Yes, we see lots of glaucoma Field Loss Not Due to Not every field that looks like glaucoma is due to glaucoma! Glaucoma If you misdiagnose glaucoma, you could miss other sight-threatening and life-threatening Sherry J. Bass, OD, FAAO disorders SUNY College of Optometry New York, NY Types of Glaucomatous Visual Field Defects Paracentral Defects Nasal Step Defects Arcuate and Bjerrum Defects Altitudinal Defects Peripheral Field Constriction to Tunnel Fields 1 Visual Field Defects in Very Early Glaucoma Paracentral loss Early superior/inferior temporal RNFL and rim loss: short axons Arcuate defects above or below the papillomacular bundle Arcuate field loss in the nasal field close to fixation Superotemporal notch Visual Field Defects in Early Glaucoma Nasal step More widespread RNFL loss and rim loss in the inferior or superior temporal rim tissue : longer axons Loss stops abruptly at the horizontal raphae “Step” pattern 2 Visual Field Defects in Moderate Glaucoma Arcuate scotoma- Bjerrum scotoma Focal notches in the inferior and/or superior rim tissue that reach the edge of the disc Denser field defects Follow an arcuate pattern connected to the blind spot 3 Visual Field Defects in Advanced Glaucoma End-Stage Glaucoma Dense Altitudinal Loss Progressive loss of superior or inferior rim tissue Non-Glaucomatous Etiology of End-Stage Glaucoma Paracentral Field Loss Peripheral constriction Hereditary macular Loss of temporal rim tissue diseases Temporal “islands” Stargardt’s macular due
  • Stargardt's Hereditary Progressive Macular Degeneration

    Stargardt's Hereditary Progressive Macular Degeneration

    Brit. 7. Ophthal. ( 1972) 56, 8I 7 Br J Ophthalmol: first published as 10.1136/bjo.56.11.817 on 1 November 1972. Downloaded from Stargardt's hereditary progressive macular degeneration A. RODMAN IRVINE AND FLOYD L. WERGELAND, JR From Ophthalmology Service, Letterman General Hospital, Presidio of San Francisco, California In a series of three papers, Stargardt ( 1909,I93, I9I6) described with precision and thoroughness a form of hereditary macular degeneration which has become known as Stargardt's disease. The purposes of the present paper are to review Stargardt's original observations, to argue that Stargardt's disease and fundus flavimaculatus with atrophic macular degeneration are identical, and to present a series of patients studied by fluorescein angiography consistent with the hypothesis that a late secondary or disuse atrophy of the choriocapillaris occurs in Stargardt's disease. Stargardt described four families. The disease seemed to show recessive inheritance, being present in siblings but never in successive generations. Symptoms were usually first noted between 8 and I6 years of age, and then progressed gradually and inexorably until all macular function was destroyed some years later. The first finding was a decrease in visual acuity, often more noticeable in the bright light than in the dark, with minimal by copyright. ophthalmoscopic changes. A faint irregularity in the pigment in the macular region was often all that could be seen at this stage, and the fundus might easily be passed as normal. Later, the foveal reflex was lost. Soft yellow-grey spots appeared in the macula which initially were barely distinguishable from the fundus background.
  • Stargardt Disease

    Stargardt Disease

    Stargardt disease Author: Professor August. F. Deutman1 Creation Date: January 2003 Scientific Editor: Professor Jean-Jacques De Laey 1Institute of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Nijmegen, Postbox 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands. Abstract Keywords Disease name and synonyms Excluded diseases Definition Frequency Clinical description Management including treatment Etiology Diagnosis References Abstract Stargardt's disease is a form of juvenile hereditary macular degeneration characterized by discrete yellowish round or pisciform flecks around the macula at the level of the retinal pigment epithelium (rpe). Stargardt's disease is the most common hereditary macular dystrophy. Prevalence is estimated between 1 in 8,000 and 1 in 10,000. Disease onset occurs typically in the first or second decade of life and manifests as decreased visual acuity. In the early stages, the macula usually shows discrete rpe changes, followed later by an horizontal ovoid zone of beaten bronze atrophy. In final stages, the macula can be associated with central areolar choroidal dystrophy. Fluorescein angiography reveals the characteristic dark choroid (''silence choroidien''), which probably results from the accumulation of lipofuscin in the rpe. This disease has usually an autosomal recessive inheritance pattern but some dominant pedigrees have been reported. The autosomal type has been associated with mutations in the ABCR gene, which encodes a transmembrane transporter protein expressed by the rod outer segments. There is currently no treatment available for Stargardt's disease. Keywords Stargardt, Macula, Fundus flavimaculatus Disease name and synonyms Definition • Stargardt’s disease Stargardt’s disease (Stargardt, 1909, 1913, • Fundus flavimaculatus 1916, 1917, 1925; Weleber, 1994; Armstrong et al., 1998) is a form of juvenile hereditary macular Excluded diseases degeneration characterized by discrete yellowish • Cone dystrophy round or pisciform flecks around the macula at the level of the retinal pigment epithelium (rpe).
  • Vision Services Professional Payment Policy Applies to the Following Carepartners of Connecticut Products

    Vision Services Professional Payment Policy Applies to the Following Carepartners of Connecticut Products

    Vision Services Professional Payment Policy Applies to the following CarePartners of Connecticut products: ☒ CareAdvantage Premier ☒ CareAdvantage Prime ☒ CareAdvantage Preferred ☒ CarePartners Access The following payment policy applies to ophthalmologists who render professional vision services in an outpatient or office setting. In addition to the specific information contained in this policy, providers must adhere to the policy information outlined in the Professional Services and Facilities Payment Policy. Note: Audit and disclaimer information is located at the end of this document. POLICY CarePartners of Connecticut covers medically necessary vision services, in accordance with the member’s benefits. GENERAL BENEFIT INFORMATION Services and subsequent payment are pursuant to the member’s benefit plan document. Member eligibility and benefit specifics should be verified prior to initiating services by logging on to the secure Provider portal or by contacting CarePartners of Connecticut Provider Services at 888.341.1508. Services, including periodic follow-up eye exams, are considered “nonpreventive/nonroutine” for members with an eye disease such as glaucoma or a condition such as diabetes. Routine Eye Examinations and Optometry Medical Services CarePartners of Connecticut has arranged for administration of the vision benefit through EyeMed Vision Care. Ophthalmologists Ophthalmologists must be contracted with EyeMed Vision Care in order to provide routine eye services or dispense eyewear to CarePartners of Connecticut members. Ophthalmologists may provide nonroutine, medical eye services to members according to their CarePartners of Connecticut agreement. REFERRAL/PRIOR AUTHORIZATION/NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS Certain procedures, items and/or services may require referral and/or prior authorization. While you may not be the provider responsible for obtaining prior authorization, as a condition of payment you must confirm that prior authorization has been obtained.
  • Association of British Dispensing Opticians Heads You Win, Tails

    Association of British Dispensing Opticians Heads You Win, Tails

    Agenda Heads You Win, Tails You Lose • The correction of ametropia • Magnification, retinal image size, visual Association of British The Optical Advantages and acuity Disadvantages of Spectacle Dispensing Opticians • Field of view Lenses and Contact lenses • Accommodation and convergence 2014 Conference Andrew Keirl • Binocular vision and anisometropia Kenilworth Optometrist and Dispensing Optician • Presbyopia. 1 2 3 Spectacle lenses Contact lenses Introduction • Refractive errors that can be corrected • Refractive errors that can be corrected using • Patients often change from a spectacle to a using spectacle lenses: contact lenses: contact lens correction and vice versa – myopia – myopia • Both modes of correction are usually effective – hypermetropia in producing in-focus retinal images – hypermetropia • apparent size of the eyes and surround in both cases • There are of course some differences – astigmatism – astigmatism between modes, most of which are • not so good with irregular corneas • better for irregular corneas associated with the position of the correction. – presbyopia – presbyopia • Some binocular vision problems are • Binocular vision problems are difficult to manage using contact lenses. easily managed using spectacle lenses. 4 5 6 The correction of ametropia using Effectivity contact lenses • A distance correction will form an image • Hydrogel contact lenses at the far point of the eye – when a hydrogel contact lens is fitted to an eye, The Correction of Ametropia the lens “drapes” to fit the cornea • Due to the vertex distance this far point – this implies that the tear lens formed between the will lie at slightly different distances from contact lens and the cornea should have zero the two types of correcting lens power and the ametropia is corrected by the BVP of the contact lens – the powers of the spectacle lens and the – not always the case but usually assumed in contact lens required to correct a particular practice eye will therefore be different.
  • Author: Dr. Geary Rummler, OD - Northport VAMC Optometric Resident Co-Author: Dr

    Author: Dr. Geary Rummler, OD - Northport VAMC Optometric Resident Co-Author: Dr

    Author: Dr. Geary Rummler, OD - Northport VAMC Optometric Resident Co-Author: Dr. Mark Hakim, OD - Northport VAMC Optometric Resident Title: A Complicating Case of Glaucoma Suspicion Confounded by Advanced Stargardt’s Disease: Testing and Alternatives for Appropriate Management. Abstract: The profile and testing for Glaucoma is well established, specifically for patients with average vision. This case-report investigates instruments and alternatives that should be emphasized for patients with advanced Stargardt’s Disease and Glaucoma Suspicion. I. Case History • Patient Demographics: 56 year old African American Male • Chief Complaint: Reduced vision, light sensitivity, and difficulty finding things he dropped or misplaced. • Ocular/Medical History: Advanced Stargardt’s, Glaucoma Suspicion, Borderline Diabetes, Hyperlipidemia, Hypertension, Depressive disorder, Back/lumbosacral pain, and Obesity • Medications: Artificial tears, Aspirin, Atenolol, Hydrochlorothiazide, Simvastatin • Other Salient Information: Legally blind under the U.S. Definition and accompanied by guide-dog II. Pertinent Findings • Clinical: Visual Acuity OD: 5ft/63 OS: 5ft/80 with illuminated Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart. Pupils, EOMs, and slit lamp examination within normal limits. Intraocular Pressure (IOP) 13/13 mm Hg taken by applanation tonometry AM pressure reading. • Physical: Dilated fundus exam (DFE) - optic nerve head (ONH) appearance 0.7 cup to disk ratio with even superior and inferior rim tissue, well perfused, thinnest rim temporally OU. Macula central patch of geographic atrophy OU. Yellow-white flecks pisciform shape scattered throughout posterior pole. • Laboratory Studies: Octopus Visual Field, Goldmann Kinetic Visual Field • Radiology Studies: Fundus Photography, Heidelberg OCT Macula and OCT ONH retinal nerve fiber layer • Others: IOP historical maximum 19/18 mm Hg, Pachymetry 543/533, family history of glaucoma III.
  • Gene Therapy for Inherited Retinal Diseases

    Gene Therapy for Inherited Retinal Diseases

    1278 Review Article on Novel Tools and Therapies for Ocular Regeneration Page 1 of 13 Gene therapy for inherited retinal diseases Yan Nuzbrokh1,2,3, Sara D. Ragi1,2, Stephen H. Tsang1,2,4 1Department of Ophthalmology, Edward S. Harkness Eye Institute, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA; 2Jonas Children’s Vision Care, New York, NY, USA; 3Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, NY, USA; 4Department of Pathology & Cell Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA Contributions: (I) Conception and design: All authors; (II) Administrative support: SH Tsang; (III) Provision of study materials or patients: SH Tsang; (IV) Collection and assembly of data: All authors; (V) Manuscript writing: All authors; (VI) Final approval of manuscript: All authors. Correspondence to: Stephen H. Tsang, MD, PhD. Harkness Eye Institute, Columbia University Medical Center, 635 West 165th Street, Box 212, New York, NY 10032, USA. Email: [email protected]. Abstract: Inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) are a genetically variable collection of devastating disorders that lead to significant visual impairment. Advances in genetic characterization over the past two decades have allowed identification of over 260 causative mutations associated with inherited retinal disorders. Thought to be incurable, gene supplementation therapy offers great promise in treating various forms of these blinding conditions. In gene replacement therapy, a disease-causing gene is replaced with a functional copy of the gene. These therapies are designed to slow disease progression and hopefully restore visual function. Gene therapies are typically delivered to target retinal cells by subretinal (SR) or intravitreal (IVT) injection.
  • Strabismus: a Decision Making Approach

    Strabismus: a Decision Making Approach

    Strabismus A Decision Making Approach Gunter K. von Noorden, M.D. Eugene M. Helveston, M.D. Strabismus: A Decision Making Approach Gunter K. von Noorden, M.D. Emeritus Professor of Ophthalmology and Pediatrics Baylor College of Medicine Houston, Texas Eugene M. Helveston, M.D. Emeritus Professor of Ophthalmology Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis, Indiana Published originally in English under the title: Strabismus: A Decision Making Approach. By Gunter K. von Noorden and Eugene M. Helveston Published in 1994 by Mosby-Year Book, Inc., St. Louis, MO Copyright held by Gunter K. von Noorden and Eugene M. Helveston All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission from the authors. Copyright © 2010 Table of Contents Foreword Preface 1.01 Equipment for Examination of the Patient with Strabismus 1.02 History 1.03 Inspection of Patient 1.04 Sequence of Motility Examination 1.05 Does This Baby See? 1.06 Visual Acuity – Methods of Examination 1.07 Visual Acuity Testing in Infants 1.08 Primary versus Secondary Deviation 1.09 Evaluation of Monocular Movements – Ductions 1.10 Evaluation of Binocular Movements – Versions 1.11 Unilaterally Reduced Vision Associated with Orthotropia 1.12 Unilateral Decrease of Visual Acuity Associated with Heterotropia 1.13 Decentered Corneal Light Reflex 1.14 Strabismus – Generic Classification 1.15 Is Latent Strabismus
  • Factsheet Stargardt Disease

    Factsheet Stargardt Disease

    Stargardt Disease This most prevalent inherited macular degeneration affects approximately 1 in 10,000 people. Disease onset is in childhood or the second decade of life. In the majority of patients it leads to legal blindness. Stargardt disease is the leading inherited cause of vision im- pairment and vision loss. It is currently an incurable condition. Stargardt patients most commonly suffer from bilateral central visual loss, photophobia, color vision abnormalities, central scotomas and slow dark adaptation. The vision impairment is rapidly progressive and occurs most often between childhood and adolescence. Stargardt disease was first described by Karl Stargardt, a Ger- man ophthalmologist, during his time at Strasbourg’s university eye hospital in 1909. He observed a loss of central vision in a Picture 1: The arrow indicates typical series of patients who all had similar lesions in the macula, a macular changes in the retina of a 1 yellowish area of the retina near its center which hosts the patient with Stargardt disease largest density of photoreceptors and is the region of keenest vision. All patients had progressive vision loss over several years; his youngest patient was only 12 years old. While Star- gardt could not clearly confirm the hereditary nature of the disorder, he described a clear family pattern. Stargardt disease is associated with mutation in several genes. The most prevalent form follows a recessive pattern, i.e. one out of four children of parents who both carry one copy of the defective gene will develop clinical symptoms. There is also a rarer dominant form of the disease. The genetic defect affects Picture 3: Impaired vision of a pa- a transport mechanism in the cell membrane.
  • Progressive Cone and Cone-Rod Dystrophies

    Progressive Cone and Cone-Rod Dystrophies

    Br J Ophthalmol: first published as 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-313278 on 24 January 2019. Downloaded from Review Progressive cone and cone-rod dystrophies: clinical features, molecular genetics and prospects for therapy Jasdeep S Gill,1 Michalis Georgiou,1,2 Angelos Kalitzeos,1,2 Anthony T Moore,1,3 Michel Michaelides1,2 ► Additional material is ABSTRact proteins involved in photoreceptor structure, or the published online only. To view Progressive cone and cone-rod dystrophies are a clinically phototransduction cascade. please visit the journal online (http:// dx. doi. org/ 10. 1136/ and genetically heterogeneous group of inherited bjophthalmol- 2018- 313278). retinal diseases characterised by cone photoreceptor PHOTORECEPTION AND THE degeneration, which may be followed by subsequent 1 PHOTOTRANSDUCTION CASCADE UCL Institute of rod photoreceptor loss. These disorders typically present Rod photoreceptors contain rhodopsin phot- Ophthalmology, University with progressive loss of central vision, colour vision College London, London, UK opigment, whereas cone photoreceptors contain 2Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS disturbance and photophobia. Considerable progress one of three types of opsin: S-cone, M-cone or Foundation Trust, London, UK has been made in elucidating the molecular genetics L-cone opsin. Disease-causing sequence variants 3 Ophthalmology Department, and genotype–phenotype correlations associated with in the genes encoding the latter two cone opsins University of California San these dystrophies, with mutations in at least 30 genes